From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Sep 23 13:26:03 1999
Received: from euch4e.chem.emory.edu (euch4e.chem.emory.edu [170.140.59.12])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA01694
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:26:03 -0400
Received: (from dima@localhost) by euch4e.chem.emory.edu (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) id NAA36942; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:20:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dmitry Khoroshun <dima@euch4e.chem.emory.edu>
Message-Id: <199909231720.NAA36942@euch4e.chem.emory.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Freezing Bond Angles
To: jamal@chemie.uni-marburg.de (Jamal Uddin)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:20:11 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: bmoritz@chem10.idbsu.edu (Benny Moritz), chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <37EA3B65.144DB9EC@chemie.uni-marburg.de> from "Jamal Uddin" at Sep 23, 1999 04:38:29 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL0b1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello!

It may be better to use opt=(AddRedund) and adding 
1 2 3 F,
where 1, 2 and 3 are the numbers of the atoms defining the
angle, to the Modredund section (right after the molecule 
specification). This way the optimization would still be 
performed in redundand internal coordinates system, which
is superior to z-matrix optimization.

Sincerely,
Dmitry Khoroshun
dima@euch4e.chem.emory.edu
According to Jamal Uddin:
> 
> Dear Morits,
> 
> You have to specify opt=Z-Matrix in the command line and in the geometry section
> you have to specify frozen angle as a constant.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Jamal Uddin
> 
> 
> Benny Moritz wrote:
> 
> > Dear Netters,
> >
> >         I have recently been working on perfluoro-2-azopropene (CF3-N=CF2)
> > trying to locate a transition state about the N=CF2 bond.  I'm having
> > trouble freezing the angle made by the C-N=C bond trying to keep it at 120
> > degrees.  I've been setting the value of the angle in the Z-Matrix as a
> > value and not a variable, but when optimized Gaussian 98 treats it as a
> > variable.  Is there anyway that I can restrict this angle from moving?
> >
> > Ben Moritz
> > bmoritz@chem.boisestate.edu
> >
> 
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Sep 23 20:46:11 1999
Received: from condor.coastalnet.com (condor.coastalnet.com [204.183.40.7])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA04203
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 20:46:04 -0400
Received: from pavilion (pm-jax5-172.coastalnet.com [205.245.112.172])
	by condor.coastalnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA20446
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 20:40:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <000c01bf0625$8e9d66e0$456cfea9@pavilion>
Reply-To: "R D Brown" <pelorus@coastalnet.com>
From: "R D Brown" <pelorus@coastalnet.com>
To: <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Hyperchem 5.1
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 20:37:58 -0400

I am a relatively new user of Hyperchem 5.1.  I have been trying to =
overlay PM3-optimized tricyclic thiamin onto omeprazole, a close =
structural analog.  I have followed the examples in the reference books =
accompanying the program, but am unable to get the "Display-->Overlay" =
menu command to work with this system. =20

Q: Does the program allow one to overlay dissimilar molecules, or only =
alternative conformers of the same compound?  Must I do ab initio =
calculations for it to work?

Thanx,

Robert D. Brown
Pelorus Research Laboratory

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Sep 24 07:54:32 1999
Received: from wirehead.arqule.com (email.arqule.com [207.252.12.140])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA07591
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 07:54:30 -0400
Received: by WIREHEAD with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10)
	id <QZQ2CWQR>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 07:46:10 -0400
Message-ID: <6B00FB949906D211A88800104B8AE520F419F8@WIREHEAD>
From: "Czerminski, Ryszard" <ryszard@arqule.com>
To: "'chemistry@ccl.net'" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: combinations
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 07:46:09 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"


I am looking for a function which could compute
combinations given lexicographical index e.g.

C(1;3,2) -> 1,2
C(2;3,2) -> 1,3
C(3;3,2) -> 2,3

I have found function which does this
( http://math.nist.gov/GAMS.html ) but it is limited
to small numbers since it is using regular 4 bytes
representation for integers and therefore index
range is severly limited ( < 2^32 ).

Any pointers to the software which does this for
integers of arbitrary length would be very much
appreciated.

Ryszard Czerminski   phone: (781)395-1269 x 479
ArQule, Inc.         e-mail: ryszard@arqule.com
200 Boston Avenue    http://www.arqule.com
Medford, MA 02155
From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Sep 24 10:57:48 1999
Received: from eros.iqm.unicamp.br (eros.iqm.unicamp.br [143.106.51.200])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA08220
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 10:57:47 -0400
Received: (from hermes@localhost)
	by eros.iqm.unicamp.br (8.9.2/8.8.8) id LAA76396
	for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 11:52:41 -0300 (EST)
	(envelope-from hermes)
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 11:52:41 -0300
From: Hermes Fernandes de Souza <hermes@IQM.Unicamp.BR>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Extended Huckel
Message-ID: <19990924115241.A76335@eros.iqm.unicamp.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i

Hi CClers,


	I would like to thanks for all sugestions

with Extended Huckel.  
	
 	I have dowload both Icon and YAeMOP programs. The
firist one is in fortran, for me it is more easy, but I am
studing the input file. The second is in C, well, I have
tudy more.
	For more one time, Thanks.


Hermes



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Sep 24 13:41:44 1999
Received: from mailserv.mta.ca (root@mailserv.mta.ca [138.73.101.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA08870
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:41:44 -0400
Received: from m0612.mta.ca (host-22-237.mta.ca [138.73.22.237])
	by mailserv.mta.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA05120
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 14:36:28 -0300 (ADT)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990924144123.007e21c0@mailserv.mta.ca>
X-Sender: mculf@mailserv.mta.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 14:41:23 -0300
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: Miroslava Culf <mculf@mta.ca>
Subject: Lipid bilayer simulations
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


Dear All,
I would like to find out more about computer simulations of lipid bilayer.
Thus I would appreciate any information about RECENT review articles or
books dealing with any aspect of computer simulation of lipid bilayer or
behaviour of lipids in the bilayer.
Thanks very much for you help,
Miroslava
P.S. I will summarize responses.

____________________________________________________________

  Miroslava Culf, Ph.D. 
  65 York St.
  Computer Services Department/Chemistry Department 
  Mount Allison University 
  Sackville, NB E4L 1E4
  Canada

  e-mail: mculf@mta.ca 
  tel. 506-364-2411 
  http://www.mta.ca/faculty/science/chem/staff/mculf.htm
____________________________________________________________


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Sep 24 13:45:27 1999
Received: from chem.idbsu.edu (chem10.idbsu.edu [132.178.136.31])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA08919
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:45:26 -0400
Received: from labasst (LABASST.boisestate.edu [132.178.213.224])
	by chem.idbsu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA18749
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 10:52:03 -0600
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990924113018.0093aa30@chem.boisestate.edu>
X-Sender: bmoritz@chem.boisestate.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 11:30:18 -0600
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: Benny  Moritz <bmoritz@chem10.idbsu.edu>
Subject: Freezing Bond Angles
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I would just like to thank all that responded to my e-mail on freezing bond
angles in Gaussian.  I was successful in obtaining the desired transition
state for my molecule, and couldn't have done it without your help.  So
thank you very much

Ben Moritz




"Whom the Gods destroy, they first make mad."
From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Sep 24 14:46:50 1999
Received: from omega.omrf.ouhsc.edu (omega.omrf.ouhsc.edu [157.142.200.207])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA09184
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 14:46:50 -0400
Received: from omega.omrf.ouhsc.edu (pcxt13.omrf.ouhsc.edu [157.142.200.245]) by omega.omrf.ouhsc.edu (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA20474 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:41:33 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <37EBC5B9.CF9B023E@omega.omrf.ouhsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:40:57 -0500
From: Elizabeth Yuriev <yurieve@omega.omrf.ouhsc.edu>
Organization: OMRF
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: sulfonamide force field parameters
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear all,

I am interested in force field parameters for sulfonamides, especially
aryl derivatives. I know that this question has been asked, answered and
summarized by David Chalmers in ca. '95 (can't check for sure since I
have not been able to use CCL search recently for some reason).
Therefore, I am after the papers or reviews on the subject appeared
since then. I am thinking about using MM2 but pointers to other force
fields are of interest as well.

Thanks in advance,
Elizabeth Yuriev

--
Elizabeth Yuriev, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Protein Crystallography
825 NE 13th Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Ph: 405 271 1672
Fax: 405 271 3980
Email: yurieve@omega.omrf.ouhsc.edu


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Sep 24 18:35:31 1999
Received: from wugate.wustl.edu (wugate.wustl.edu [128.252.120.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA10314
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:35:31 -0400
Received: from mirlink.wustl.edu (mirlink.wustl.edu [128.252.155.1])
	by wugate.wustl.edu (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA06970
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 17:30:11 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <n1273928284.82083@MIRLink.wustl.edu>
Date: 24 Sep 1999 17:28:40 -0500
From: "David Reichert" <reichertd@mirlink.wustl.edu>
Subject: DFT & frequency calculations
To: "CCL post" <chemistry@ccl.net>
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-MS 3.0.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; Name="Message Body"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id SAA10315

Hi,
I'm hoping that someone can provide some enlightenment. I've been running some DFT calculations on some copper - amine complexes which appear to end up having only C1 symmetry. In order to ensure that these are indeed minimum energy structures, I've run frequency calculations on them as well. My question is what should I really be seeing in the frequency calculations? I know that for a transition structure you look for one imaginary frequency, and that ideally the translational and rotational modes should drop out. But in real life with non-perfect calculations what do you want to see that says, "Yes, this is indeed a low energy fully converged struture". Any rules of thumb are more than welcome.
thanks,
dave reichert
____________________________________________
| David Reichert, Ph.D                     |
| Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology      |
| Washington University School of Medicine |
| St. Louis, MO                            |
|                                          | 
| e-mail: reichertd@mirlink.wustl.edu      |
| voice: (314) 362-8461                    | 
| fax:   (314) 362-9940                    |
____________________________________________

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Sep 24 16:25:35 1999
Received: from cardinal.prod.itd.earthlink.net (cardinal.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.154])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA09869
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 16:25:35 -0400
Received: from lrz.de (1Cust182.tnt1.rancho-cucamonga.ca.da.uu.net [208.251.225.182])
	by cardinal.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA18038
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from eugene.leitl@localhost)
	by lrz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA14275
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:17:45 -0700
Resent-From: Eugene Leitl <eugene.leitl@lrz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <14315.56425.461006.571048@lrz.de>
Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Message-Id: <199909241342.PAxxxA18515@chinon.cnrs-orleans.fr>
X-Authentication-Warning: chinon.cnrs-orleans.fr: hinsen set sender to hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr using -f
Precedence: bulk
From: <eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
To: beowulf@beowulf.gsfc.nasa.gov
Subject: Network performance
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 15:42:06 +0200


From: hinsen@dirac.cnrs-orleans.fr

We are planning to build a Beowulf-type cluster, using either
dual-processor Pentium III nodes or single-processor Alpha nodes (we'd
prefer Pentium nodes, but administrative complications might force us
to buy Alphas). The biggest open question is the type of network:

- Fast Ethernet
- 2x Fast Ethernet (channel bonding)
- Myrinet
- Gigabit Ethernet

In view of the significant cost of Myrinet or Gigabit Ethernet, we'd
like to have some information on what performance increase we can
expect *for our applications*, which are Molecular Dynamics
simulations of biomolecular systems. Has anyone ever done a comparison
for this type of calculation between systems with identical nodes that
differ only in networking performance? Or is there any way to estimate
the performance difference? It doesn't have to be very precise, we
just want to decide if it is better to invest into fast networks or
into more nodes.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen                            | E-Mail: hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr
Centre de Biophysique Moleculaire (CNRS) | Tel.: +33-2.38.25.55.69
Rue Charles Sadron                       | Fax:  +33-2.38.63.15.17
45071 Orleans Cedex 2                    | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/
France                                   | Nederlands/Francais
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Sep 24 20:50:07 1999
Received: from bluejay.prod.itd.earthlink.net (bluejay.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.108])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA11093
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 20:50:06 -0400
Received: from lrz.de (1Cust80.tnt1.rancho-cucamonga.ca.da.uu.net [208.251.225.80])
	by bluejay.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA13633
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 17:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from eugene.leitl@localhost)
	by lrz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA15747;
	Fri, 24 Sep 1999 17:42:14 -0700
From: Eugene Leitl <eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14316.6757.120970.769337@lrz.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 17:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Cornell Theory Center Computational Biology Tools
X-Mailer: VM 6.71 under 21.1 (patch 4) "Arches" XEmacs Lucid


http://www.tc.cornell.edu/reports/NIH/resource/CompBiologyTools/

The NIH "Parallel Processing Resource for Biomedical Scientists" at
the Cornell Theory Center announces a major release of computer
programs for molecular and protein modeling. The code was developed by
the groups of Ron Elber and Harold Scheraga and is released to the
public domain. Although the code is not copyrighted, we expect you to
reference the code to the extent that it helped you in your work. We
further expect that this code will NOT be used as a whole or as a part
of any commercial software.

This release includes the following: 

- protein folding 
The ECEPPAK package. A set of programs based on the ECEPP/3 force
field used to study the conformational properties of polypeptides and
proteins. Among others, ECEPPAK includes computational tools to carry
out global conformational searches at the all-atom level. A parallel
version of the code using MPI is available for an IBM SP.

- molecular dynamics 
The MOIL modeling package to simulate structure, dynamics, and
function of biological molecules at the atomic level of detail. Note
the availability of a Window version in the present release and a
parallel version for stochastic path simulations.

- protein recognition 
The LOOPP program (Linear Optimization Of Protein Potentials).  A
program for potential optimization and alignments. LOOPP aligns
sequence to sequence, sequence to structure, and structure to
structure. It further enables the optimization of potentials and
scoring functions for the above mentioned applications.

- process dihedral angle files 
The ANALYZE package to classify conformations obtained from a global
search into families and compute conformational characteristics such
as RMS deviations and interproton distances.  It can also estimate the
statistical weights of the conformations by fitting the theoretically
calculated average NOE intensities and coupling constants to the
respective experimental data.

A workshop will be held on the Cornell University campus November
15-16, 1999 to provide an in-depth description and hands-on experience
with the software packages that the resource just released to the
public domain. See

http://www.tc.cornell.edu/Events/1999/CompBiologyTools 
