From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Nov 25 08:09:42 1999
Received: from mailhost.rdg.ac.uk (exim@sumh1.rdg.ac.uk [134.225.16.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA05289
	for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 08:09:42 -0500
Received: from indyp.chemistry ([134.225.168.35] helo=reading.ac.uk)
	by mailhost.rdg.ac.uk with esmtp (University of Reading Email Service)
	id {11qxdN-0000Iw-00} 
	for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 12:04:21 +0000
Sender: dave@ccl.net
Message-ID: <383D25E6.FC365E56@reading.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 12:04:54 +0000
From: Dave Price <d.w.price@reading.ac.uk>
Organization: none-what-so-ever
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP22)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Comp Chem Mailing List <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>
Subject: Problem running g94 on Irix 6.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear All,
	I have compiled g94 on an SGI Indy R5000 under Irix 6.5.1.
However, when I try to run it on a similar machine (R5000 Irix 6.5.1)
I get this error-

Local:indyp 20 % g94 < com/test000.com > sgi/test000.log
 5523:g94: rld: Fatal Error: Cannot Successfully Map soname 'libblas.so' under
any of the filenames
/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94s/bsd/libblas.so:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94/bsd/libblas.so:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94s/private/libblas.so:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94/private/libblas.so:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94s/libblas.so:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94/libblas.so:/usr/lib32/libblas.so:/usr/lib32/internal/libblas.so:/lib32/libblas.so:/opt/lib32/libblas.so:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94s/bsd/libblas.so.1:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94/bsd/libblas.so.1:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94s/private/libblas.so.1:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94/private/libblas.so.1:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94s/libblas.so.1:/usr/scratch/indigog/g94/g94/libblas.so.1:/usr/lib32/libblas.so.1:/usr/lib32/internal/libblas.so.1:/lib32/libblas.so.1:/opt/lib32/libblas.so.1: 

But-
Local:indyp 21 % whereis libblas.so
libblas: /usr/lib/libblas.so /usr/lib/libblas.a
/usr/share/catman/p_man/cat3/libblas


Help?
	Cheers,
		Dave
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. David W. Price,       Tel: +44 (0)118 9875123  extn 7415
Department of Chemistry,  Fax: +44 (0)118 9316331
University of Reading,    mailto:d.w.price@reading.ac.uk
Whiteknights, 
READING                http://www.chem.rdg.ac.uk/g50/mmrg/dave/dave.html
RG6 6AD 
U.K.
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Nov 26 11:48:08 1999
Received: from dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br [150.164.65.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA12061
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:47:56 -0500
Received: from localhost (noronha@localhost)
	by dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA49490
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 13:42:02 -0200
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 13:42:01 -0200 (BDB)
From: antonio luiz oliveira de noronha <noronha@dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: BeoWolf
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.96.991126134008.60869A-100000@dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

CCL friends
Where may I find information about how to build a beowolf cluster, his
capabilities and other information??
Best regards

 ___________________________________________________________________
|                                                                   |
|Antonio Luiz Oliveira de Noronha   -   noronha@dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br |
|Medicinal Chemistry of Organotin Compounds                         |
|NEQUIM - Medicinal Chemistry Group                                 |
|Chemistry Departament - DQ                                         |
|UFMG - Federal University of Minas Gerais - Brazil                 |
|Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627 - Campus Pampulha                         | 
|CEP 31270-901 - Belo Horizonte - MG - Brazil                       |
|VOICE +55 31 499 5765   -   FAX +55 31 499 5700                    |
|___________________________________________________________________|

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Nov 26 12:06:01 1999
Received: from MFD42U02.U-3MRS.FR (MFD42U02.U-3MRS.FR [193.51.220.34])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA12173
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 12:06:00 -0500
Received: from carro.u-3mrs.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by MFD42U02.U-3MRS.FR (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id RAA12126 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 17:12:35 +0100
Sender: ccl@MFD42U02.U-3MRS.FR
Message-ID: <383EB172.41C6@carro.u-3mrs.fr>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 17:12:34 +0100
From: Computational chemistry list <ccl@MFD42U02.U-3MRS.FR>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01SGoldC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX 6.3 IP32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: boron PM3 parameters
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear ccl'ers

I would like to know if boron PM3 parameters exists, and boron-magnesium
parameters.

Thanks 

-- 
*****************************************************************
                   SREP Laboratory                	
      Structure et reactivite des especes paramagnetiques
               Groupe de chimie theorique
         Universite de Provence, Marseille, France		
              E-mail: ccl@carro.u-3mrs.fr               	
            Phone # : (ext) + 04-91-28-84-14         
            FAX   # : (ext) + 04-91-98-85-12    
*****************************************************************
From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Nov 26 12:28:37 1999
Received: from mail-b.bcc.ac.uk (mail-b.bcc.ac.uk [144.82.100.22])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA12300
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 12:28:37 -0500
Received: from biochem.ucl.ac.uk (actually host bsmori1.biochem.ucl.ac.uk) 
          by mail-b.bcc.ac.uk with SMTP (XT-PP) with ESMTP;
          Fri, 26 Nov 1999 16:22:42 +0000
Received: from bsmir18.biochem.ucl.ac.uk (bsmir18 [128.40.46.21])	by biochem.ucl.ac.uk (8.9.2/8.9.1) 
          with ESMTP id QAA15894	for <chemistry@ccl.net>;
          Fri, 26 Nov 1999 16:22:53 GMT
Received: from localhost (nobeli@localhost)	by bsmir18.biochem.ucl.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) 
          with SMTP id QAA07155	for <chemistry@ccl.net>;
          Fri, 26 Nov 1999 16:22:53 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: bsmir18.biochem.ucl.ac.uk: nobeli owned process 
                          doing -bs
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 16:22:53 +0000 ("GMT)
From: Irene Nobeli <nobeli@biochemistry.ucl.ac.uk>
X-Sender: nobeli@bsmir18
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Answers to : Dock and lone pairs
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.93.991126161851.16121c-100000@bsmir18>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


I summarise the answers I received to my question on how DOCK treats lone
pairs. Many thanks to the people who helped me out.

My question was:
>>>>>>>>>>
Could any Dock 4.0 user please help me with this?
I am one of these unfortunate people who try to use DOCK 4.0 without
having Sybyl available to prepare the receptor and ligand files. I tried
to use InsightII instead but I ran into the following problem: I load the
protein (receptor) in InsightII, add hydrogens, and attempt to assign
charges using the AMBER force field. However, charges seem to be only
properly assigned, if I also allow lone pairs to be added. Can DOCK deal
with lone pair sites? Am I supposed to use this mol2 file (with H and lone
pairs) in the grid calculation, and then use the original (with no H and
no lone pairs) for docking? 
Also, if anyone knows a discussion list for DOCK users, could they please
send me an address?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

and the answers:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From yadavm@scripps.edu  Wed Nov 24 15:12:56 1999
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 07:12:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Maneesh Yadav <yadavm@scripps.edu>

Hi Irene,
The only thing that is used for dock is the energy grid and sphere
appoximation of the active site, generate the grid after potentials 
are assigned from the forcefield.
 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From antony@dina.kvl.dk  Wed Nov 24 15:57:33 1999
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 16:57:23 +0100 (MET)
From: Jens Antony <antony@dina.kvl.dk>

You are perfectly right to my mind. The receptor in DOCK is represented by
two entities: - a set of spheres which represent the geometry of the
proposed binding site and - a grid enclosing the spheres which is used for
energy calculation. The .mol2 file only enters into the grid calculation. 
The spheres are generated directly from the pdb file. Therefore lone pairs
should not constitute a difficulty for DOCK in principle as long as the
potentials are set reasonably. However, you should be aware that the
calculated binding in DOCK energy is very approximate.

> Also, if anyone knows a discussion list for DOCK users, could they please
> send me an address?

dock@francisco.ucsf.edu is a very useful email address where you can
direct your technical questions to. You are probably familiar with the
official DOCK www page: http://www.cmpharm.ucsf.edu/kuntz/dock.html.

Hope it helps,

Jens

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From todd.ewing@camitro.com  Wed Nov 24 16:59:32 1999
From: Todd Ewing <todd.ewing@camitro.com>

Lone pairs in the mol2 file for grid input should be no
problem, just make sure that the LP atom type exists
in your vdw.defn file and that it has a non-zero but
small radius and well-depth.  Also make a molecular
surface for the protein with no hydrogens or lone pairs
using ms with MIDAS package or QCPE, and use that
for sphgen input.

Good luck!

Todd


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Nov 26 15:29:59 1999
Received: from metropolis.nuclecu.unam.mx (basiuk@metropolis.nuclecu.unam.mx [132.248.29.92])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA13106
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 15:29:58 -0500
Received: from localhost (basiuk@localhost)
	by metropolis.nuclecu.unam.mx (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA14446
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 13:26:49 -0600
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 13:26:49 -0600 (CST)
From: Vladimir Basiuk <basiuk@nuclecu.unam.mx>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: TS
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.991126132015.14192A-100000@metropolis.nuclecu.unam.mx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCLers,

Please could you help me to clarify the following point.
Is the presence of one imaginary frequency the necessary and sufficient
criterion to consider the structure as TS? 
Thank you and best regards,
Vladimir

***********************************************
                                              
Dr. Vladimir Basiuk
Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Circuito Exterior C.U.
A. Postal 70-543
04510 Mexico, D.F., MEXICO

Tel: 	(52) 56 16 27 97
     	(52) 56 22 46 74
Fax: 	(52) 56 16 22 33
email: 	basiuk@nuclecu.unam.mx

***********************************************

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Nov 26 17:40:27 1999
Received: from ivory.trentu.ca (trentu.ca [192.75.12.103])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA13713
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 17:40:26 -0500
Received: from el1 ([204.225.13.50]) by trentu.ca (PMDF V5.2-32 #29543)
 with SMTP id <01JIST36GG7K004B04@trentu.ca> for chemistry@ccl.net; Fri,
 26 Nov 1999 16:33:20 EST
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 16:36:46 -0500
From: Errol Lewars <elewars@trentu.ca>
Subject: TRANSITION STATE AND IMAGINARY..., ANSWER
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <383EFD6E.7188@trentu.ca>
Organization: Trent University
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

1999 Nov 26

Hello, Vladimir Basiuk asked:

***
From: 
    Vladimir Basiuk <basiuk@nuclecu.unam.mx>
    To: 
        chemistry@ccl.net
Dear CCLers,

Please could you help me to clarify the following point.
Is the presence of one imaginary frequency the necessary and sufficient
criterion to consider the structure as TS? 
Thank you and best regards,
Vladimir
 ***

The answer is yes. A structure is a TS if and only if it has one
imaginary frequency. Of course 
(1)this alone does not prove it is the TS you are looking for, and
(2) at another level of calculation the TS may become a minimum or    
hilltop.

E Lewars
