From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Dec 22 20:35:44 1999 Received: from deimos.cber.nih.gov (deimos.cber.nih.gov [128.231.52.2]) by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA27762 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:35:13 -0500 Received: from localhost by deimos.cber.nih.gov with SMTP (1.37.109.14/16.2) id AA260888548; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 19:22:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 19:22:27 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Venable To: Eugene Leitl Cc: chemistry@ccl.net, gfahy@21cm.com Subject: Re: CCL:Athlon K7 chemistry benchmarks In-Reply-To: <14432.4848.113251.17212@lrz.uni-muenchen.de> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Eugene Leitl wrote: > Very interesting results for g98 and CHARMm > > http://www.cpureview.com/art_k7sci1_a.html And apparently incorrect, at least for G98; the site now has a retraction. The K7 CHARMM numbers aren't that impressive either-- if I scale the P3 result to the 600 Mhz clock speed for the K7, I get an est. 612 sec, instead of the reported 642 sec. -- Rick Venable =====\ |=| "Eschew Obfuscation" FDA/CBER Biophysics Lab |____/ |=| Bethesda, MD U.S.A. | \ / |=| ( Not an official statement or Rick_Venable@nih.gov | \ / |=| position of the FDA; for that, http://www.erols.com/rvenable \/ |=| see http://www.fda.gov ) From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Dec 22 21:41:08 1999 Received: from scheraga2.chem.cornell.edu (SCHERAGA2.CHEM.CORNELL.EDU [128.253.229.63]) by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA28035 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 21:41:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (czarek@localhost) by scheraga2.chem.cornell.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA14552 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:47:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:47:33 -0500 (EST) From: Cezary Czaplewski To: chemistry@ccl.net Subject: Re: CCL:Athlon K7 chemistry benchmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII The GROMACS programm has very nice webpage with benchmarks http://rugmd0.chem.rug.nl/~gmx/gmxbench.html, and K7 and P3 results are included for the same CPU clock speed (runtime in seconds): Machine Compiler CPU Clock Cache SPC1 SPC2 Pep Micel HIV HPr PC AMD gcc K 7 600 512 - 42 136 303 267 331 PC Intel gcc P III 600 512 26 54 174 366 307 401 As you can see at least in case of C code compiled with gcc K7 wins with P3 on average by 20% czarek