From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Mon Mar  6 17:57:59 2000
Received: from ralun.usach.cl (root@ralun.usach.cl [158.170.64.21])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA30559
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 17:57:55 -0500
Received: from lauca.usach.cl ([158.170.51.104])
	by ralun.usach.cl (8.10.0.Beta10/8.10.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id e26LpZs03625
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:51:35 -0300 (CDT)
Message-ID: <38C4374B.795A1FA@lauca.usach.cl>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 18:55:07 -0400
From: danilo2 <fgonzale@lauca.usach.cl>
To: CCL <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: partial optimization (x,y,z) in G98

Hi all!

    I trying to do a partial optimization using cartesian coordenates
(x,y,z) in G98.
Anybody know how can I fix some atoms during the optimization?
(don't using Z-matrix)

Thanks a lot for any help!


Fernando Gonzalez N.

University of Santiago de Chile
Faculty of Chemistry and Biology.
Casilla 40, Correo 33, Santiago, Chile     Fono: (562) 6811542; 6811644
E-mail : fgonzale@lauca.usach.cl                       6811366,
Anexo:717
Fax : (562) 681 2108   Fax-Wave: 530-327-8534
**************************************************************************





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Mar  7 03:49:20 2000
Received: from mail.zrz.tu-berlin.de (mail.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE [130.149.4.15])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA00337
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 03:49:14 -0500
Received: from argon.chem.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.131.31])
	  by mail.zrz.tu-berlin.de with smtp (exim-3.13)
	  for <chemistry@ccl.net>
	  id 12SEee-0005Ei-00; Tue, 07 Mar 2000 08:43:45 +0100
Received: by argon.chem.tu-berlin.de (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/ZRZ-AIX)
          id AA33314; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:50:59 +0100
From: Wolfram Koch <kochw@argon.chem.tu-berlin.de>
Message-Id: <10003070750.AA33314@argon.chem.tu-berlin.de>
Subject: commercial announcement: new book on DFT
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 100 08:50:59 +0100 (NFT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text

Dear colleagues,
those of you interested in DFT might want to learn
about following new book:

Koch, Wolfram / Holthausen, Max C.
A Chemist's Guide to Densitiy Functional Theory
198.- DM / 101.24 EUR / 176.- SFR
2000. XIV, 294 pages. Hardcover
ISBN 3-527-29918-1 Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (Germany)

>From the Table of Contents:
Elementary Quantum Chemistry, Electron Density and Hole Functions,
The Electron Density as Basic Variable: Early Attempts,
The Hohenberg-Kohn Theorems, The Kohn-Sham Approach,
The Quest for Approximate Exchange-Correlation Functionals,
The Basic Machinery of Density Functional Programs, Molecular
Structures and Vibrational Frequencies, Relative Energies and
Thermochemistry, Electric Properties, Magnetic Properties, Hydrogen
Bonds and Weakly Bound Systems, Chemical Reactivity: Exploration
of Potential Energy Surfaces, Bibliography, Index.

>From the Foreword by Evert Jan Baerends:
"It is because of the well equilibrated treatment of physical principles
and chemical applications that this book does a good and very timely
service to the computational and quantum chemists as well as to the
chemistry community at large. I am happy to recommend it to this audience".

>From comments by P. v. R. Schleyer on the back cover:
"Chemists familiar with conventional quantum mechanics will applaud and
benefit greatly from this particularly instructive, thorough and clearly
written exposition of density functional theory: its basis, concepts, 
terms, implementation, and performance in diverse applications. 
Users of DFT for structure, energy, and molecular property computations, 
as well as reaction mechanism studies, are guided to the optimum choices 
of the most effective methods. Well done!".

For further information see:
http://www.wiley-vch.de/books/tis/eng/3-527-29918-1.html
or contact the authors at 
kochw@argon.chem.tu-berlin.de or mh@qc.ag-berlin.mpg.de

Cheers,
Wolfram

-- 
_________________________________________________________________________

 Prof. Dr. Wolfram Koch     Institut fuer Organische Chemie, Sekr.C3
                            Technische Universitaet Berlin
                            Strasse des 17.Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin
                            Fon: +49 30 314 27870, Fax: +49 30 314 21102
                            e-mail: kochw@argon.chem.TU-Berlin.DE
_________________________________________________________________________


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Mar  7 10:06:37 2000
Received: from kasei.materials.ox.ac.uk (kasei.materials.ox.ac.uk [163.1.64.46])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA02751
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 10:06:35 -0500
Received: from localhost (hfield@localhost)
	by kasei.materials.ox.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA26072
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 14:00:12 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: kasei.materials.ox.ac.uk: hfield owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 14:00:12 +0000 (GMT)
From: Andrew Horsfield <andrew.horsfield@materials.ox.ac.uk>
X-Sender: hfield@kasei.materials.ox.ac.uk
Reply-To: Andrew Horsfield <andrew.horsfield@materials.ox.ac.uk>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Lebedev again
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003071353090.26064-100000@kasei.materials.ox.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi,

Having had some time to think about the Lebedev tables I received
following an earlier posting, I am now struck by how wide the spacings are
between different meshes. By this I mean that tables exist for (say) l = 3
(6), l = 5 (14), l = 7 (26), l = 9 (38), l = 11 (50), but then nothing
more until l = 15 (86), where l is the maximum angular monetum that can be
integrated, and the number in brackets is the number of points. I have
checked several sources, and everyone does something similar. Is there a
reason for this apart from the inconvenience of having to type in multiple
tables (like you need to double the number of points to get an extra digit
of accuracy)?

Cheers,

Andrew

  +----------------------------------------------------+
   Andrew Horsfield       e-mail: horsfield@fecit.co.uk 
     FECIT, 2 Longwalk Road, Stockley Park, Uxbridge,   
          Middlesex UB11 1AB, United Kingdom.           
   phone: +44-(0)181-606-4653  FAX: +44-(0)181-606-4422 
  +----------------------------------------------------+



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Mar  7 11:32:54 2000
Received: from mail.science.siu.edu (mail.science.siu.edu [131.230.107.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA03240
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:32:54 -0500
Received: from tapas (131.230.99.83) by mail.science.siu.edu with SMTP (Eudora
 Internet Mail Server 2.2); Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:27:20 -0600
Message-ID: <002001bf8849$72561ee0$5363e683@thchem.siu.edu>
From: "Tapas Kar" <tapaskar@siu.edu>
To: "danilo2" <fgonzale@lauca.usach.cl>, "CCL" <chemistry@ccl.net>
References: <38C4374B.795A1FA@lauca.usach.cl>
Subject: Re: CCL:partial optimization (x,y,z) in G98
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:26:01 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

Use opt=addredundant (G94) =Modredundant (G98) in first line and
after coordinates add lines like
1 2    2.1 F
this indicates freeze bond length between atom 1 and 2 at 2.1
See Gaussian98 user's reference manual page 119-120 ( 113-114 in Gaussian 94
user's reference) for more info.

----------------------------------------------------
Tapas Kar, Ph. D
Department of Chemistry
1245 Lincoln Dr. # 146F
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, IL 62901-4409

Tel: 618-453-6485(Off)/6433(Lab)
Fax: 618-453-6408

email: tapaskar@siu.edu
            tapas@risky3.thchem.siu.edu
----- Original Message -----
From: danilo2 <fgonzale@lauca.usach.cl>
To: CCL <chemistry@ccl.net>
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 4:55 PM
Subject: CCL:partial optimization (x,y,z) in G98


> Hi all!
>
>     I trying to do a partial optimization using cartesian coordenates
> (x,y,z) in G98.
> Anybody know how can I fix some atoms during the optimization?
> (don't using Z-matrix)
>
> Thanks a lot for any help!
>
>
> Fernando Gonzalez N.
>
> University of Santiago de Chile
> Faculty of Chemistry and Biology.
> Casilla 40, Correo 33, Santiago, Chile     Fono: (562) 6811542; 6811644
> E-mail : fgonzale@lauca.usach.cl                       6811366,
> Anexo:717
> Fax : (562) 681 2108   Fax-Wave: 530-327-8534
> **************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To
Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net
70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan:
jkl@ccl.net
>
>
>
>
>


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Mar  7 12:03:43 2000
Received: from havana.ks.uiuc.edu (havana.ks.uiuc.edu [130.126.120.73])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA03484
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 12:03:42 -0500
Received: from bastogne.ks.uiuc.edu (bastogne.ks.uiuc.edu [130.126.120.128])
	by havana.ks.uiuc.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA22800
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:58:08 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from brunner@localhost)
	by bastogne.ks.uiuc.edu (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id JAA02080
	for chemistry@ccl.net; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:58:09 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:58:09 -0600
From: Robert Brunner <brunner@ks.uiuc.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Announce: BioCoRe
Message-ID: <20000307095808.A2057@ks.uiuc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i

Hello,

We have just released BioCoRe, the first version of our collaborative
research environment for molecular modeling.  Please try it out,
and let us know if you find it useful, and what we can do to improve it.
Please send feedback to collaboratory@ks.uiuc.edu.

More details on BioCoRe are included below.

Thanks,
Robert Brunner
rbrunner@uiuc.edu
-------------------------------------------

Urbana, Illinois - The Theoretical Biophysics Group at the
University of Illinois is proud to announce the initial public release
of BioCoRE, a collaborative research environment.  BioCoRE software is
freely available for use at the Theoretical Biophysics Group website.
BioCoRE development is supported by the NIH National Center for
Research Resources.

Modern computational structural biology requires scientists to employ a
wide range of tools and techniques to solve complex problems while
keeping accurate and complete records of research activities.
Additional complications are introduced by the need to effectively
engage in interdisciplinary collaborations with geographically
dispersed colleagues. The software BioCoRE, a collaborative research
environment for molecular modeling and simulations, addresses these
challenges.

Initial design work has led to a web-based architecture focused on four
primary interface paradigms:

  + a WORKBENCH interface includes features for controlling molecular
modeling, simulation, and bioinformatics tools with convenient and
uniform access to collaboratory data.  Initial tools in this category
include the ability to start and monitor molecular dynamics simulations
via a web browser interface.

  + a NOTEBOOK interface automates recording of research activities.
Initial tools in this category include a notebook tool which can be used
by researchers to engage in offline discussions as well as review and
search the entire text of any prior chat session.

  + a CONFERENCE interface enables scientists to discuss their research
across distances in real time or time-delayed sessions and will spawn
software for teleconferencing and synchronized visualization of shared
data at distant sites.  Initially, this category includes a text-based
chat mechanism where the researchers can choose topics and converse with
other researchers who are working on the same project.

  + a DOCUMENTS interface permits the preparation of multi-author
documents in a cross-platform revision control system.

BioCoRE consists of html and javascript and java where needed.

For additional information, please visit the BioCoRE website at
<http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/collaboratory/>.

The Theoretical Biophysics group encourages BioCoRE users to be closely
involved in the development process through reporting bugs, contributing
fixes, periodical surveys and via other means.  Questions or comments
may be directed to collaboratory@ks.uiuc.edu.

We are eager to hear from you, and thank you for using our software!    



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Mar  7 13:05:26 2000
Received: from harfang.CC.UMontreal.CA (harfang.CC.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.102])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA03870
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:05:26 -0500
Received: from esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA (esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.91])
	by harfang.CC.UMontreal.CA (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA18050;
	Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:59:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (wangx@localhost) by esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA with ESMTP id LAA316440
  (8.8.7/IDA-1.6); Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:59:50 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA: wangx owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:59:49 -0500
From: Wang Xiaogang <wangx@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA>
X-Sender: wangx@esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA
To: Y Z <yz0@hotmail.com>
cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Re: f90 and f77 differ when compiling large array ?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.05.10003071122520.310230-100000@esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.05.10003071156020.310230-100000@esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCLers,
I just found out a solution to my question,
I can use allocatable array to solve this problem in f90.

use something like
      DOUBLE COMPLEX, allocatable::AA(:,:,:)

      allocate(aa(256,256,256))

Is this the only way to handle large arrays in f90?

Xiaogang

On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Wang Xiaogang wrote:

> Dear CCLers,
> Concerning the same question asked recently on CCL (compile a large array
> in fortran), I found a strange thing,
> 
> When I use f77, the suggested prescriptions all work. (use 'common' 
> or 'save' or '-static' compiler option)
> But when I use f90, all of them fail. I get the error message
> 
>       DOUBLE COMPLEX AA(256,256,256)
>                      ^               
> f90-1435 f90: ERROR TEST, File = fft.f, Line = 4, Column = 22 
>   The storage size needed for "AA" exceeds 268,435,455 bytes, the maximum
> storage size available.
> 
> f90: MIPSpro Fortran 90 Version 7.3  (f52) Tue Mar  7, 2000  11:31:58
> 
> 
> My question is why f90 compiler cannot allocate large array to data
> segment while f77 compiler can?
> 
> My stacksize limit is about 500 megabytes.
> I met this problem on SGI origin 2000, irix 6.5.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Xiaogang
> 
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Y Z wrote:
> 
> > After I asked the question for 3D-FFT,
> > I got a lot of  responses. Thanks a lot for
> > their helps , my problem have been solved.
> > 
> > 
> > Here is the summary
> > 
> > My original question is:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Are there any way to calculate a (256,256,256) order
> > DOUBLE COMPLEX FFT in FORTRAN77? I tried to do the
> > following subrouitine but cannot pass the compiling.
> > 
> > 
> > By f77 in SGI :
> > 
> > Warning: Stack frame size (270015328) larger than system limit (67108864)
> > 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 
> >      program test
> >      IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION (A-H,O-Z)
> >      DOUBLE COMPLEX AA(256,256,256)
> >      DIMENSION ID(64),CC(64)
> >      DIMENSION NORD(3)
> >      DO 100 i=1,256
> >       DO 100 j=1,256
> >         DO 100 k=1,256
> >           xx=DBLE(I+j+k)
> >           AA(i,j,k)=DCMPLX(xx,0.0D0)
> > 100   CONTINUE
> >      NORD(1)=8
> >      NORD(2)=8
> >      NORD(3)=8
> >      IERR=0
> >      CALL DFFT3D(dta,NORD,ID,CC,1,IERR)
> >      STOP
> >      END
> > 
> ------------------------------------------------
> Dr Xiaogang Wang 
> Departement de chimie 
> Universite de Montreal
> C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville
> Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7
> 
> Tel. (514) 3436111 ext. 3947 (office)
> FAX  (514) 3437586 (office)
> e-mail: wangx@magellan.umontreal.ca
> http://physchem.ox.ac.uk/~xgwang/
> ------------------------------------------------
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------
Dr Xiaogang Wang 
Departement de chimie 
Universite de Montreal
C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville
Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7

Tel. (514) 3436111 ext. 3947 (office)
FAX  (514) 3437586 (office)
e-mail: wangx@magellan.umontreal.ca
http://physchem.ox.ac.uk/~xgwang/
------------------------------------------------


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Mar  7 13:30:52 2000
Received: from harfang.CC.UMontreal.CA (harfang.CC.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.102])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA04049
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:30:52 -0500
Received: from esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA (esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.91])
	by harfang.CC.UMontreal.CA (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA16364;
	Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:48:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (wangx@localhost) by esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA with ESMTP id LAA317768
  (8.8.7/IDA-1.6); Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:48:07 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA: wangx owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:48:06 -0500
From: Wang Xiaogang <wangx@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA>
X-Sender: wangx@esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA
To: Y Z <yz0@hotmail.com>
cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: f90 and f77 differ when compiling large array ?
In-Reply-To: <20000222234220.32641.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.05.10003071122520.310230-100000@esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCLers,
Concerning the same question asked recently on CCL (compile a large array
in fortran), I found a strange thing,

When I use f77, the suggested prescriptions all work. (use 'common' 
or 'save' or '-static' compiler option)
But when I use f90, all of them fail. I get the error message

      DOUBLE COMPLEX AA(256,256,256)
                     ^               
f90-1435 f90: ERROR TEST, File = fft.f, Line = 4, Column = 22 
  The storage size needed for "AA" exceeds 268,435,455 bytes, the maximum
storage size available.

f90: MIPSpro Fortran 90 Version 7.3  (f52) Tue Mar  7, 2000  11:31:58


My question is why f90 compiler cannot allocate large array to data
segment while f77 compiler can?

My stacksize limit is about 500 megabytes.
I met this problem on SGI origin 2000, irix 6.5.

Thanks.

Xiaogang

On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Y Z wrote:

> After I asked the question for 3D-FFT,
> I got a lot of  responses. Thanks a lot for
> their helps , my problem have been solved.
> 
> 
> Here is the summary
> 
> My original question is:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Are there any way to calculate a (256,256,256) order
> DOUBLE COMPLEX FFT in FORTRAN77? I tried to do the
> following subrouitine but cannot pass the compiling.
> 
> 
> By f77 in SGI :
> 
> Warning: Stack frame size (270015328) larger than system limit (67108864)
> 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
>      program test
>      IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION (A-H,O-Z)
>      DOUBLE COMPLEX AA(256,256,256)
>      DIMENSION ID(64),CC(64)
>      DIMENSION NORD(3)
>      DO 100 i=1,256
>       DO 100 j=1,256
>         DO 100 k=1,256
>           xx=DBLE(I+j+k)
>           AA(i,j,k)=DCMPLX(xx,0.0D0)
> 100   CONTINUE
>      NORD(1)=8
>      NORD(2)=8
>      NORD(3)=8
>      IERR=0
>      CALL DFFT3D(dta,NORD,ID,CC,1,IERR)
>      STOP
>      END
> 
------------------------------------------------
Dr Xiaogang Wang 
Departement de chimie 
Universite de Montreal
C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville
Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7

Tel. (514) 3436111 ext. 3947 (office)
FAX  (514) 3437586 (office)
e-mail: wangx@magellan.umontreal.ca
http://physchem.ox.ac.uk/~xgwang/
------------------------------------------------


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Mar  7 13:55:12 2000
Received: from sunu450.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (sunu450.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de [134.147.64.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA04214
	for <Chemistry@CCL.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:55:12 -0500
Received: (qmail 18987 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2000 17:49:36 -0000
Received: from cvw.orch.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (HELO ?134.147.110.57?) (134.147.110.57)
  by mailhost.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with SMTP; 7 Mar 2000 17:49:36 -0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: wuellcbd@mailhost.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Message-Id: <a04310101b4eaf0f4a342@[134.147.110.57]>
In-Reply-To: 
 <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003071353090.26064-100000@kasei.materials.ox.ac.uk>
References: 
 <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003071353090.26064-100000@kasei.materials.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 18:49:26 +0100
To: Andrew Horsfield <andrew.horsfield@materials.ox.ac.uk>
From: Christoph van =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=FCllen?=  <Christoph.van.Wuellen@Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.De>
Subject: Re: CCL:Lebedev again
Cc: Chemistry@CCL.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

>Hi,
>
>Having had some time to think about the Lebedev tables I received
>following an earlier posting, I am now struck by how wide the spacings are
>between different meshes. By this I mean that tables exist for (say) l = 3
>(6), l = 5 (14), l = 7 (26), l = 9 (38), l = 11 (50), but then nothing
>more until l = 15 (86), where l is the maximum angular monetum that can be
>integrated, and the number in brackets is the number of points. I have
>checked several sources, and everyone does something similar. Is there a
>reason for this apart from the inconvenience of having to type in multiple
>tables (like you need to double the number of points to get an extra digit
>of accuracy)?
>
... Lebedev considers only grids with octahedral symmetry, so adding 
a grid point which is not on too many symmetry elements has many 
brothers and sisters on equivalent positions. Furthermore, not all 
grids theoretically possible are numerically useful (i.e. usually one 
does not want grids with negative weights).
-- 
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Christoph van Wullen       | Fon (University):  +49 234 32 26485
Theoretical Chemistry      | Fax (University):  +49 234 32 14109
Ruhr-Universitaet          | Fon/Fax (private): +49 234 33 22 75
D-44780 Bochum, Germany    | eMail: Christoph.van.Wuellen@Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.de
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Mar  7 13:57:50 2000
Received: from sunu450.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (sunu450.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de [134.147.64.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA04241
	for <Chemistry@CCL.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:57:49 -0500
Received: (qmail 22298 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2000 17:52:14 -0000
Received: from cvw.orch.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (HELO ?134.147.110.57?) (134.147.110.57)
  by mailhost.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with SMTP; 7 Mar 2000 17:52:14 -0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: wuellcbd@mailhost.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Message-Id: <a04310102b4eaf21be89c@[134.147.110.57]>
In-Reply-To: 
 <Pine.SGI.4.05.10003071156020.310230-100000@esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA>
References: 
 <Pine.SGI.4.05.10003071156020.310230-100000@esi21.ESI.UMontreal.CA>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 18:52:07 +0100
To: Wang Xiaogang <wangx@MAGELLAN.UMontreal.CA>
From: Christoph van =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=FCllen?=  <Christoph.van.Wuellen@Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.De>
Subject: Re: CCL:f90 and f77 differ when compiling large array ?
Cc: Chemistry@CCL.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

... if stack or data size is not sufficient this will not solve your 
problem but only defer it until program execution (not compilation).
-- 
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Christoph van Wullen       | Fon (University):  +49 234 32 26485
Theoretical Chemistry      | Fax (University):  +49 234 32 14109
Ruhr-Universitaet          | Fon/Fax (private): +49 234 33 22 75
D-44780 Bochum, Germany    | eMail: Christoph.van.Wuellen@Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.de
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Mar  7 15:35:26 2000
Received: from if1.if.ufrgs.br (if1.if.ufrgs.br [143.54.4.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA04803
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 15:35:24 -0500
From: PEROTT@if.ufrgs.br
Received: from if1.if.ufrgs.br by if1.if.ufrgs.br (PMDF V4.3-10 #7035)
 id <01JMRABWQ9IO0012M7@if1.if.ufrgs.br>; Tue, 07 Mar 2000 16:28:32 -0003
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 16:28:32 -0003
Subject: Mass storage devices
To: chemistry@server.ccl.net
Message-id: <01JMRABWR2GI0012M7@if1.if.ufrgs.br>
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@www.ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Hi !
A feature common to most of the computational chemistry software currently
available is the huge amount of data that is frequently read/write from/to
scratch files. The performance of a computational chemistry application so
depends largely on transference rates from/to hard discs or other mass storage
devices. In this context, let me address a couple of questions to the list:
i) what is the best strategy (in terms of best performance): write a few, huge
files to huge disk partitions or, alternatively, split big files into smaller
ones over many disk partitions?
ii) could someone point to additional information on fast access mass storage
devices?
 I'll summarize to the list!     
                                 Claudio.




