From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Jul  7 14:55:05 2000
Received: from ned1.sims.nrc.ca (ned1.sims.nrc.ca [132.246.108.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA15005
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:55:05 -0400
Received: from fm6 (fm6.sims.nrc.ca [132.246.100.170])
	by ned1.sims.nrc.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA01602
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:55:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <002b01bfe844$e2e14ee0$aa64f684@sims.nrc.ca>
From: "Hongbin Du" <hdu@ned1.sims.nrc.ca>
To: <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Q: AIM analysis (Delocalization index)
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:55:08 -0400
Organization: Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4029.2901
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4029.2901

Dear CClers,
I am trying to calculate the delocalization index using AIMPAC preograms,
which is formulated as: F(A,B)=F(B,A)=-sum{sum[Sij(A)Sij(B)]}, where Sij(A)
is the corresponding atomic overlap matrix given by the PROAIM program. Does
anybody know what is the format for the matrix, i.e. how to read the
following matrix for example (using Fortran Language)?

The Atomic Overlap Matrix
Restricted Closed-Shell Wavefunction
  0.000000
  0.000000  0.000000
 -0.000005 -0.000003  0.500000
 -0.000005 -0.000003  0.500000  0.500000
..................................

I would appreciate your help.

Hongbin


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Jul  7 16:03:00 2000
Received: from shiva.hunter.cuny.edu (shiva.hunter.cuny.edu [146.95.128.96])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA15464
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:03:00 -0400
Received: from shiva (shiva [146.95.128.96])
	by shiva.hunter.cuny.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA03614;
	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:03:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:03:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: AM <amasunov@shiva.hunter.cuny.edu>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
cc: Alan.Shusterman@directory.reed.edu,
        Artem Masunov <amasunov@shiva.hunter.cuny.edu>
Subject: RE: Are atoms spherical?
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10007071547200.29957-100000@shiva.hunter.cuny.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

If you look at VdW contacts between atoms in molecular crystals,
atoms are NOT spherical (especially Cl and Br). There are papers 
analyzing this phenomenon, e.g. Nyburg, 1987. 
On details and more refs. see

"Geometric characteristics of Halogen...Halogen
intermolecular contacts in organic crystals"
A.E.Masunov, P.M.Zorky 
Russ.J.Phys.Chem. 1992, 66(1), 31-35 

HTH
Artem


From: 
                                      
Alan.Shusterman@directory.reed.edu
(Alan Shusterman)
                                      30 Jun 2000 17:35:21 PDT
                           Subject: 
                                      Are atoms spherical?


                          Programs like Spartan produce nonspherical
isodensity surface
                              for many atoms (for example, any of the
halogens). I woul
                              like to know if this outcome is physically
reliable, i.
                             ., are only some atoms spherical?
                          I can see why the computational programs yield
nonspherical electro
                              density distributions. This is because a UHF
or UDFT calculatio
                              on fluorine (5 valence p electrons) assigns
2 electrons t
                              p_x, 2 electrons to p_y, but only 1 electron
to p_z. Bu
                              is this physically realistic?
                          I'll summarize answers after July 4th.
                          -Alan
                          ====
                          Alan Shusterman
                          Department of Chemistry
                          Reed College
                          Portland, OR


      __    ___________  Artem.Masunov@usa.net;tel 212-650-7792;fax877-280-5146
     /  \  /  __   __  \ Ph.D., Research Associate, Computational Biophys.Chem.
    /    \/\  \ \  \ \  \   Chemistry Department, City College, City U. of NY
   /  /\  \ \  \ \  \ \  \  J-1325, Convent Ave at 138 Str, New York, NY 10038
  /  ____  \ \  \ \  \ \  \ ---------------------------------------------------
 /__/\ _/\ _\ \ _\ \ _\ \ _\   FORGIVE MY NONSENSE AS I ALSO FORGIVE THOSE 
 \ _\/  \/__/\ __/\ __/\ __/   WHO THINK THEY TALK SENSE  --  ROBERT FROST



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Jul  7 16:19:36 2000
Received: from facepe.dqf.ufpe.br (root@facepe.dqf.ufpe.br [150.161.5.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA15631
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:19:14 -0400
Received: from npd.ufpe.br (pipa.dqf.ufpe.br [150.161.5.24])
	by facepe.dqf.ufpe.br (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA03223
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:21:41 -0300
Message-ID: <39663C17.AF4F2341@npd.ufpe.br>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 17:22:47 -0300
From: Gerd Bruno Rocha <gbr@npd.ufpe.br>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Dipole moment integrals
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

I am looking for analytic expressions of atomic dipole moment integrals
of the form <nl|r|n'l'> where nl and n'l' represent hydrogen-type
orbitals or Slater-type orbitals.
Do any of you know a reference conatining such expressions?
Thank you in advance,
Gerd Bruno Rocha

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Jul  7 17:51:51 2000
Received: from gate.pnl.gov (gate.pnl.gov [130.20.64.137])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA16414
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:51:37 -0400
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by pnl.gov (PMDF V5.2-32 #35482)
 id <01JRHMQNGUW08WXT0U@pnl.gov> for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Fri,
 7 Jul 2000 14:49:28 PDT
Received: from pnlmse1.pnl.gov ([130.20.128.21])
 by pnl.gov (PMDF V5.2-32 #35482) with ESMTP id <01JRHMQL7XF28Y6P59@pnl.gov>
 for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Fri, 07 Jul 2000 14:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by PNLMSE1.pnl.gov with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
 id <3M8L3VQS>; Fri, 07 Jul 2000 14:49:19 -0700
Content-return: allowed
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 14:49:17 -0700
From: "Feller, David F" <david.feller@pnl.gov>
Subject: A Revised (and Shortened) EMSL Ab Initio Benchmark Report
To: "'CCL (Ohio State)'" <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Message-id: <6DBB005AF9DDD31193030008C7A49DC830711A@pnlmse8.pnl.gov>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-type: text/plain;	charset="windows-1252"

Over the past 7 years, we have published an Ab Initio Benchmark Report,
originally as a hardcopy document and later via the web.  The goal of the 
previous editions was quite ambitious.  We compared a fairly wide variety 
of applications and hardware platforms using a common set of calculations.  
Unfortunately, the necessary level of effort could not be sustained, so that the

last version of the report was in June, 1997.
(see http://www.emsl.pnl.gov:2080/docs/tms/abinitio/cover.html) 

We have recently had an opportunity to benchmark a number of single and
dual processor workstations, including some based on the Intel Pentium
and AMD Athlon processors.  Although the associated data is much more
restricted than the information in our previous reports, e.g. only one
application
(Gaussian 98) was used, we felt that people might still find the information
of some use.   All of the data was obtained with locally purchased copies
of Gaussian executables, i.e. G98 was not "tweaked" in any way in order to 
obtain the optimal performance from each box. 

Please see http://www.emsl.pnl.gov:2080/docs/tms/abinitio-v4/cover.html. 

David Feller                                | d3e102@emsl.pnl.gov 
Environmental Molecular Sciences Lab., K8-91| Box 999
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory       | Richland, WA 99352 
                                            | Fax: 509-375-6631

