From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sat Sep 30 08:12:32 2000
Received: from kr-outmail1.lycos.co.kr ([211.51.63.160])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA19996
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 08:11:58 -0400
Message-Id: <200009301211.IAA19996@server.ccl.net>
From: nursekim@lycos.co.kr
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: MP2 NMR Error
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 21:10:41 +0900 (KST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: SoftForum-WebMail 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dear CCLers,

I have performed the calculation on 13C NMR chemical shift for
some compounds using Gaussian 98. But I have encountered the
error. Embarrassingly I can't calculate the chemical shift
of reference, TMS. 

The output says:
 Estimated scratch disk usage=    65012376 words.
 Actual    scratch disk usage=    64828629 words.
 (rs|ai) integrals will be sorted in core.
 Actual    scratch disk usage=    64828629 words.
 (rs|ai) integrals will be sorted in core.
 ANorm=    0.1103718560D+01
 E2 =    -0.6404363466D+00 EUMP2 =    -0.44804187799569D+03
          Differentiating once with respect to magnetic field using GIAOs.
          Differentiating once with respect to nuclear magnetic moment.
 iStart.ne.1 in Gobb11.
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /home/g98/l1002.exe.
 Job cpu time:  0 days  0 hours 10 minutes 39.1 seconds.
 File lengths (MBytes):  RWF=  541 Int=    0 D2E=    0 Chk=    8 Scr=    1

The following is the input.
%chk=TMSna
%mem=400MB
%rwf=a,255MW,b,255MW,c,255MW,d,255MW,e,255MW
#T MP2=Direct/6-31G* NMR SCF=Tight
 Geom=Check Guess=Read Test

13C NMR Ref.

0 1

I don't know why the job is terminated abnormally, but it seems that this error is not due to the system resouces. What means iStart.ne.1? 

Would you please give me a tip of advice?

sincerely yours,
Nursekim



----------------------------------------------------------------
  Lycos Korea Inc.
  http://www.lycos.co.kr
----------------------------------------------------------------


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sat Sep 30 21:42:11 2000
Received: from mailgw.cc.uga.edu (mailgw.cc.uga.edu [128.192.1.101])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA23085
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 21:42:11 -0400
Received: from zopyros.ccqc.uga.edu by mailgw.cc.uga.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.025851E1@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 21:42:03 -0400
Received: from localhost (zxwang@localhost)
	by zopyros.ccqc.uga.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id VAA29662;
	Sat, 30 Sep 2000 21:42:02 -0400
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 21:42:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Zhi-Xiang Wang <zxwang@zopyros.ccqc.uga.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
cc: pradipta@si.fi.ameslab.gov, kresslists@kressworks.com,
        harry@chem.queensu.ca, Bernd.Hartke@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE,
        aileen.cheung@ic.ac.uk
Subject: summary: global minimum 
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.96.1000930213633.29723A-100000@zopyros.ccqc.uga.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


   My original question is:

   How to find a global minimum for a cluster with around 20 atoms.

Acknowledgment:
  I appreciate greatly the answers from the following colleagues.

   Pradipta ---- pradipta@si.fi.ameslab.gov
   Jim      ---- kresslists@kressworks.com
   Igor Shamovsky -----harry@chem.queensu.ca
   Bernd ------Bernd.Hartke@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
   Aileen----- aileen.cheung@ic.ac.uk 

Summary
  (1)  Pradipta wrote: 
    There are a number of methods to find global minimum structure. 
Because of its importance in various fields, the literature is spread over
a wide variety of journals. I think the most useful methods are:
    Simulated annealing, Genetic algorithm, multicanonical algorithm.
-huge number of papers have been published using those ( especially with
the first two) algorithms. But it is very important what kind of potential
you want to use for your systems. I am at present using full quantum
mechanical calculation for some systems and  unless the above mentioned 
algorithms are supplemented with a local optimization routine, it is very
difficult to get anything. Even in general it may be a good idea to use 
local optimization technique with global optimization technique.

  (2) Jim  suggested
     Try Tinker.  You can find it at:
     http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker/
  (3) Igor told me
     The simulated annealing approach might be very efficient for your 
system
  (4) Bernd informed me
     one method I can suggest is Genetic Algorithms and their descendants;
for this, you may want to check out my web page (see below), in particular
J.Comput.Chem. 20 (1999) p.1752 and Z.Phys.Chem. 214 (2000) 1251.
  (5) Aileen asked me
     I am interested in the replies ... can you please forward me any 
information you get from the list?
  (6) I recommend the websites 
      http://fandango.ch.cam.ac.uk
      and http://brian.ch.cam.ac.uk















