From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Mon Oct  2 19:06:14 2000
Received: from chala.q1.fcen.uba.ar (chala.q1.fcen.uba.ar [157.92.31.25])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA02811
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:06:12 -0400
Received: from localhost (damian@localhost)
	by chala.q1.fcen.uba.ar (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA13088
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:38:35 +0200
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:38:35 +0200 (MEST)
From: =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?Dami=E1n_Scherlis?= <damian@chala.q1.fcen.uba.ar>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: open shell singlet
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010022223460.13082-100000@chala.q1.fcen.uba.ar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



 Hello.
       Does anyone know whether an EPR experimet is able to
 distinguish between open and closed shell singlets ?
       If it is not: is there any experiment capable of detecting
 an open shell singlet ?

       Thanks a lot.

-- 
 Damian Scherlis
 Department of Physical Chemistry
 Faculty of Sciences
 University of Buenos Aires



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 02:18:05 2000
Received: from iisc.ernet.in (iisc.ernet.in [144.16.64.3])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA04427
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 02:17:56 -0400
Received: from helix.orgchem.iisc.ernet.in (IDENT:srb@orgchem.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.77.3])
	by iisc.ernet.in (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA98621
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:49:38 +0530 (IST)
Received: from localhost (srb@localhost)
	by helix.orgchem.iisc.ernet.in (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA14050
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:52:43 +0530
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:52:43 +0530 (IST)
From: "R.B.Sunoj" <srb@orgchem.iisc.ernet.in>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Orbital switching
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10010031145100.13968-100000@helix.orgchem.iisc.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear Netters:

I am using G94 for performing certain triplet geometry optimizations using
B3LYP/6-31G* method. I have tried orbital switching by 'guess=alter'
keyword. But always the optimized geometry land up at the previously found
minima (ie, before switching the orbitals).

Interestingly the out put writes the following,

'Pairs of beta orbitals switched'

Again, the MO coefficients tells that the switching is *NOT* done!.

(I have a C1 symmetric triplet system).

Any suggestions will be appreciated.

with regards,
Sunoj


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 02:29:41 2000
Received: from tigris.klte.hu (tigris.klte.hu [193.6.138.33])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA04495
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 02:29:40 -0400
Received: from anti07 (193.6.133.59) by tigris.klte.hu (MX V5.1-A Vn6f) with
          SMTP for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:28:51 +0200
Message-ID: <000c01c02d03$84d0c480$3b8506c1@chem.klte.hu>
From: "Tamas E. Gunda" <tamasgunda@tigris.klte.hu>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10010021155370.15249-100000@lauca.usach.cl>
Subject: Re: CCL:cross eyes glass
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:31:09 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id CAA04496

Hi,

I bought a few years ago from Aldrich. Look in the Aldrich catalog. 

regards

Tamas Gunda

> I looking for any address for buy a glass (based in mirrors) to look
> stereo pictures using cross eyes.
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> Danilo Gonzalez
> University of Santiago of Chile
> Faculty of Chemistry and Biology
> casilla 40, correo 33,
> Santiago CHILE
> 
> Fax: 562 - 681 2108
> 

Dr Tamas E. Gunda
Research Group for Antibiotics of the Hungarian Acad. Sci.
University of Debrecen, POBox 36
H-4010 Debrecen, Hungary
tel.: (+36-52) 316666/2472
fax: (+36-52) 512914
e-mail: tamasgunda@tigris.klte.hu
home-page: www.klte.hu/~gundat/gunda.htm






From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 03:34:28 2000
Received: from nmr-v.ioc.ac.ru (root@nmr-v.ioc.ac.ru [193.233.3.213])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA04813
	for <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 03:34:27 -0400
Received: from cacr.ioc.ac.ru (val@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nmr-v.ioc.ac.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA21599
	for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:38:02 +0400
Sender: val@nmr-v.ioc.ac.ru
Message-ID: <39DC2FDA.DB57757B@cacr.ioc.ac.ru>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 11:38:02 +0400
From: Valentine Ananikov <val@cacr.ioc.ac.ru>
Reply-To: val@cacr.ioc.ac.ru
Organization: IOC
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13 i686)
X-Accept-Language: ru, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCL_post <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>
Subject: Second order TS's crossroads
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


  Dear CCL'ers,

There are two questions concerning second order TS's, which I
found being rather contradictory in the literature. So:

1) in some articles one may read something like that: "... we
found that reaction proceeds through the second order transition
state ... and gives desired products ..."

while the other authors state: "... second order saddle points
are of no interest for chemical reactions ..."

Where is the truth? May a chemical transformation proceed through
a second order transition state?

2) Next,

If there is a second order TS, does it mean that there are
also two independent first order TS's representing each of the 
imaginary vectors of the former? Is the statement always correct?


Any suggestions and references are very welcome.

best regards,
Valentine.


====================================================================
                                             ,         ,      ,   ,
Valentine P. Ananikov                        |\\\\ ////|     /////|
NMR Group                                    | \\\|/// |    ///// |
ND Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry   |  |~~~|  |   |~~~|  |
Leninsky Prospect 47                         |  |===|  |   |===|  |
Moscow  117913                               |  |   |  |   |   |  |
Russia                                       |  | A |  |   | Z |  |
                                              \ |   | /    |   | /
e-mail: val@cacr.ioc.ac.ru                     \|===|/     |===|/
http://nmr.ioc.ac.ru/Staff/AnanikovVP/          '---'      '---'
  Fax +7 (095)1355328   Phone +7 (095)9383536
====================================================================


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 09:04:13 2000
Received: from boris.3dp.com (boris.3dp.com [207.106.4.70])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA07035
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:04:12 -0400
Received: from DIMITRIS (dimitris.3dp.com [199.33.182.106])
	by boris.3dp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA26363
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:03:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Dimitris K. Agrafiotis" <dimitris@3dp.com>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: MMFF Smarts atom type definitions
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:05:57 -0400
Message-ID: <003001c02d3a$ac5182b0$6ab621c7@DIMITRIS>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal

Dear colleagues,

Has anyone developed Smarts definitions for the MMFF force field
atom types? Thanks in advance,

---
Dimitris K. Agrafiotis, PhD              | E-mail: dimitris@3dp.com
3-Dimensional Pharmaceuticals, Inc.      | Tel:    (610) 458-6045
665 Stockton Drive, Suite 104            | Fax:    (610) 458-8249
Exton, PA 19341
 



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 10:04:25 2000
Received: from rzumail2.unizh.ch (rzumail2.unizh.ch [130.60.128.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA07371
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:04:25 -0400
Received: from toukie.zzmk.unizh.ch (zzmkfw.unizh.ch [130.60.67.4])
	by rzumail2.unizh.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/07) with ESMTP id QAA03047;
	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:04:12 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20001003150508.00a85150@ziaix-imap.unizh.ch>
X-Sender: toukie@ziaix-imap.unizh.ch (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:12:18 +0100
To: chemistry@server.ccl.net
From: "Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro" <toukie@zui.unizh.ch>
Subject: IR halfband widths
Cc: toukie@zui.unizh.ch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Dear Colleagues;

	I quote from an article published in Spectrochim. Acta 19: 1013 (1963):

	"Band broadening can also result where a complex polyatomic molecule can 
exist in different conformational forms.  If the centers of conformational 
isomerism are ultimately involved in the normal vibration responsible for 
the absorption, it is likely that two separate bands will be resolved, and 
many cases of this kind are known.  However, if centers of conformational 
isomerism are more remote from the atoms primarily involved in the normal 
vibration, the perturbation of the steric change on the band frequency may 
be very small, in which case it will only act to broaden the band.  NO 
EXAMPLES OF SUCH AN EFFECT HAVE YET BEEN POSITIVELY DEMONSTRATED 
...."  [Emphasis by capitalisation added.]

	I would be very interested in hearing from anyone who can supply me with 
references definitively demonstrating conformational IR band broadening of 
the type that, as of 1963, still had not been positively demonstrated.

Thanks in advance to all responders,

S. Shapiro
toukie@zui.unizh.ch



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 10:11:40 2000
Received: from rzumail2.unizh.ch (rzumail2.unizh.ch [130.60.128.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA07416
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:11:40 -0400
Received: from toukie.zzmk.unizh.ch (zzmkfw.unizh.ch [130.60.67.4])
	by rzumail2.unizh.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/07) with ESMTP id QAA04739;
	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:11:26 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20001003151843.00a9da70@ziaix-imap.unizh.ch>
X-Sender: toukie@ziaix-imap.unizh.ch
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:19:36 +0100
To: chemistry@server.ccl.net
From: "Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro" <toukie@zui.unizh.ch>
Subject: ? re H-bonding
Cc: toukie@zui.unizh.ch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id KAA07417

Dear Colleagues;

     Consider a phenolic molecule residing in the vicinity of an external
hydrogen bond (:B) acceptor such that an intermolecular hydrogen bond is
formed between the phenol and the external hydrogen bond acceptor

                     C6H5-O-H --- :B

Now, let a hydrogen bond donor (H-O-A) migrate into the vicinity of the
phenolic oxygen atom such that a second hydrogen bond can form with the
phenolic oxygen atom:

                     C6H5-O-H --- :B
                          ¦
                          ¦
                          H-O-A

Under such circumstances, would formation of a second hydrogen bond
between H-O-A and C6H5OH lead to a weakening of the hydrogen bond
strength between C6H5-O-H and the hydrogen bond acceptor :B?  Any
references or experimental data with which you can provide me that will
shed light on this question would be most sincerely appreciated.

Thanks in advance to all responders,

S.  Shapiro
toukie@zui.unizh.ch



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 11:16:53 2000
Received: from gw-chimie.math.unibuc.ro (gw-chimie.math.unibuc.ro [193.226.51.14])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA07876
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:16:49 -0400
Received: from localhost (andreir@localhost)
	by gw-chimie.math.unibuc.ro (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA02467
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:19:39 +0300
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:19:38 +0300 (EEST)
From: Andrei Ionescu <andreir@gw-chimie.math.unibuc.ro>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: gamess problem 
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1001003171809.2425B-100000@gw-chimie.math.unibuc.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear all,
I am trying to optimize the geometry for an excited state. 
I was surprised to find that even the example provided by the user manual
did not work. 

Here is the input and the error message given by the output:
I did make a setenv line for the DAFL30 file in the rungms script.

 $CONTRL SCFTYP=GVB CITYP=GUGA RUNTYP=TRUDGE COORD=HINT $END
 $BASIS  GBASIS=N31 NGAUSS=6 $END
 $SCF DIRSCF=.TRUE. $END
 $GUGDIA   NSTATE=5  $END
 $GUGDM    IROOT=3   $END
 $DATA
Methylene TCSCF+CISD geometry optimization
CNV  2

C    6.     LC  0.00  0.0  0.00  -  O  K
H    1.    PCC  1.00  53.  0.00  +  O  K  I
 $END
 $SCF NCO=3 NPAIR=1 $END
 $TRUDGE OPTMIZ=GEOMETRY  NPAR=2 IEX(1)=21,22   P(1)=1.08 $END
 $CIDRT  GROUP=C1 SOCI=.TRUE. NFZC=1 NDOC=3 NVAL=1 NEXT=-1 $END


          ---------------------------------------
          MULLIKEN AND LOWDIN POPULATION ANALYSES
          ---------------------------------------
 *** ERROR *** ATTEMPT TO READ A DAF RECORD THAT WAS NEVER WRITTEN.
 RECORD NUMBER   70 OF LENGTH        13 DOES NOT EXIST.
 CHECK -PROG.DOC- FOR A LIST OF DIRECT ACCESS FILE CONTENTS
 EXECUTION OF GAMESS TERMINATED ABNORMALLY AT Sun Jul 23 00:38:28 2000
 STEP CPU TIME =      .01 TOTAL CPU TIME =        2.1 (     .0 MIN)
 TOTAL WALL CLOCK TIME=        2.0 SECONDS, CPU UTILIZATION IS 105.00%
 121410 WORDS OF DYNAMIC MEMORY USED
 IF YOU WANT A CORE FILE, SET COREFL=.TRUE. IN $SYSTEM.
 STOP IN ABRT statement executed

I will really appreciate any clue.
Regards.

------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     ANDREI RADU IONESCU            andreir@gw-chimie.math.unibuc.ro

     Department of Physical Chemistry at the University of Bucharest
     Bd. Elisabeta 4-12, 70346 Bucharest, Romania
     Phone: +40/01/3131120   Fax: +40/01/3159249

  http://gw-chimie.math.unibuc.ro



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 13:01:08 2000
Received: from Mercury.acs.unt.edu (mercury.acs.unt.edu [129.120.220.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA08757
	for <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:00:46 -0400
Received: from jove.acs.unt.edu (10759@jove.acs.unt.edu [129.120.220.41])
	by Mercury.acs.unt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA11607
	for <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:00:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (tdp0006@localhost)
	by jove.acs.unt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA22455
	for <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:00:12 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:00:11 -0500 (CDT)
From: TREVOR D POWER <tdp0006@unt.edu>
To: CCL_post <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:Second order TS's crossroads
In-Reply-To: <39DC2FDA.DB57757B@cacr.ioc.ac.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10010031136120.20777-100000@jove.acs.unt.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Valentine,
	I actually ran into this head first when I was doing modeling of
organolithium reactions about a year ago. Many theoreticians will tell you
that a second-order transition state is a theoretical entity and cannot
be called a transition state nor a molecule anyway.  If fact the only
correct designation would probably be a second-order saddle point.  When
one is looking for a transition state that describes a particular reaction
and they instead find such a maximum, this usually means that the reaction
they are trying to model is actually not concerted and may go through two
transition states and 1 intermediate.  I would think that one needs to go
to extreme measures to find a second-order saddle point; such as symmetry
or geometry restrictions (a partial optimization --- which does not make 
a lot of sense).  
	I would expect that those papers describing a reaction to go
through second-order saddle points are in journals not set up to
rigorously review computational manuscripts (like J. Org. Chem. for 
example).  You would do well to find papers on this subject in J. Phys.
Chem or J. Chem. Phys.  Alan Isaacson, Miami University, wrote a few
papers (none are reviews though) that began my literature search on this
topic.
	I would agree with the "other authors" as stated below.  The
principle of least motion is violated in a second-order saddle point.  

Hope my posting does not spark too many fires out there.

Regards,
Trevor D. Power
Department of Chemistry
University of North Texas
NT Station, Box 305070
Denton, Tx 76201-5070
tdp0006@unt.edu


On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Valentine Ananikov wrote:

> 
>   Dear CCL'ers,
> 
> There are two questions concerning second order TS's, which I
> found being rather contradictory in the literature. So:
> 
> 1) in some articles one may read something like that: "... we
> found that reaction proceeds through the second order transition
> state ... and gives desired products ..."
> 
> while the other authors state: "... second order saddle points
> are of no interest for chemical reactions ..."
> 
> Where is the truth? May a chemical transformation proceed through
> a second order transition state?
> 
> 2) Next,
> 
> If there is a second order TS, does it mean that there are
> also two independent first order TS's representing each of the 
> imaginary vectors of the former? Is the statement always correct?
> 
> 
> Any suggestions and references are very welcome.
> 
> best regards,
> Valentine.
> 
> 
> ====================================================================
>                                              ,         ,      ,   ,
> Valentine P. Ananikov                        |\\\\ ////|     /////|
> NMR Group                                    | \\\|/// |    ///// |
> ND Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry   |  |~~~|  |   |~~~|  |
> Leninsky Prospect 47                         |  |===|  |   |===|  |
> Moscow  117913                               |  |   |  |   |   |  |
> Russia                                       |  | A |  |   | Z |  |
>                                               \ |   | /    |   | /
> e-mail: val@cacr.ioc.ac.ru                     \|===|/     |===|/
> http://nmr.ioc.ac.ru/Staff/AnanikovVP/          '---'      '---'
>   Fax +7 (095)1355328   Phone +7 (095)9383536
> ====================================================================
> 
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 13:52:04 2000
Received: from web3403.mail.yahoo.com (web3403.mail.yahoo.com [204.71.203.57])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA08940
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:52:04 -0400
Message-ID: <20001003174944.25063.qmail@web3403.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [136.142.109.103] by web3403.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 03 Oct 2000 10:49:44 PDT
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mary Boyden <mnboyden@yahoo.com>
Subject: program to calc. internal coordinates and PED
To: chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dear CCL:

I would like to find a program which will accept the
normal mode Cartesian coordinates from a Gaussian 98
output file, convert them to internal coordinates, and
find the potential energy distribution for one of the
normal modes.  Are there any (preferably free)
programs available that will accomplish this?  

I am a beginner and really appreciate all help.

Thanks!
Mary Boyden

Department of Chemistry
Unversity of Pittsburgh   

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 15:13:48 2000
Received: from qtp.ufl.edu (zwart.qtp.ufl.edu [128.227.89.3])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA09197
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:13:48 -0400
Received: from pc1 (pc1 [128.227.192.187])
	by qtp.ufl.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA22359
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:13:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <010701c02d6e$6f84cac0$bbc0e380@qtp.ufl.edu>
From: "Stefan Fau" <fau@qtp.ufl.edu>
To: "CCL - all" <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Re: Second order TS's crossroads
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:16:30 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

Hi Valentine,

to 1)

I think that 2nd order TSs are of little importance, chemically.
If you have a 2nd order TS with one imaginary mode connecting
your reactants and products, you can optimize along the other
imaginary mode and get a 1st order TS that should still connect
your reactants and products. (I don't know of any exceptions to
that, but maybe there are a few.) Due to the optimization, the energy
of this 1st order TS is lower, and therefore more reacting molecules
should pass along here (assuming that the effects of nuclear motion
are small enough).

Classically, every point (geometry) on the potential energy
hypersurface which is below the molecules energy is accessible
by that molecule. So if you supply your molecule with lots of energy
lots of geometries are possible. If you give just enough energy to
keep
a very slow reaction going virtually all product molecules will have
passed the 1st order TS.

to 2)

A 2nd order TS is not generally connected to four 1st order TSs (two
for each imaginary mode). I once had a 2nd order TS connected to
two mirror-symmetric 1st order TSs and two minima. The first order
TSs connected the same minima. I think that this scheme might be
common with 2nd order TSs of higher symmetry.

The example is published in
S. Fau, G. Frenking, Theochem - J. Mol. Struct. 1995, 338, 117-130.
I think the 2nd order TS was a C2v structure of B2CH4, the 1st order
TS was non-planar Cs and the minimum was planar Cs.

Stefan
______________________________________________________________________
Dr. Stefan Fau                    |      fau@qtp.ufl.edu
Quantum Theory Project     |     (352) 392-6714
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-8435




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 17:39:25 2000
Received: from unlserve.unl.edu (unlserve.unl.edu [129.93.1.130])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA10033
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:39:25 -0400
Received: from localhost (jmazlo@localhost)
	by unlserve.unl.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.2) with SMTP id QAA75966
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:28:48 -0500
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:28:48 -0500 (CDT)
From: Johanna Mazlo <jmazlo@unlserve.unl.edu>
To: chemistry@server.ccl.net
Subject: autodock: max_tors
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.02.10010031604160.68046-100000@unlserve.unl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCL members,

I am a new user of AUTODOCK.  I am trying to dock a peptide to a fab
portion of an antibody. I am having difficulty with the step:
autodock3 -p lig.macro.dpf -l lig.macro.dlg &

The peptide has more than the default for MAX_TORS of 32, therefore 
this step does not successfully complete and it says that the MAX_TORS
has exceeded the limit (32) thus change constant.h.  I have changed 
the constant.h to 100. I have also done what the manual suggests which is
the change the MAX_TORS in autodock.h to 100 and recompile.  I have gone
back and done all the steps including making the pdqs, autotors, etc.
However, it still says that the MAX_TORS of 32 has been exceeded and will
not complete the docking using autodock3.  I am hoping someone could tell
me what I am doing wrong.    

Thank you for your help.


Johanna Mazlo

University of Nebraska
Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0304
jmazlo@unlserve.unl.edu


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 18:00:23 2000
Received: from schrodinger.com (root@thermidore.schrodinger.com [199.245.177.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA10152
	for <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:00:22 -0400
Received: from schrodinger.com (natasha.schrodinger.com [192.156.98.136])
	by schrodinger.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA28435;
	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:59:47 -0700
Message-ID: <39DA55EB.FDD04A12@schrodinger.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 14:55:55 -0700
From: George Vacek <vacek@schrodinger.com>
Organization: Schrodinger, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: TREVOR D POWER <tdp0006@unt.edu>
CC: CCL_post <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:Second order TS's crossroads
References: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10010031136120.20777-100000@jove.acs.unt.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

TREVOR D POWER wrote:

>         Many theoreticians will tell you
> that a second-order transition state is a theoretical entity and cannot
> be called a transition state nor a molecule anyway.  If fact the only
> correct designation would probably be a second-order saddle point.  When
> one is looking for a transition state that describes a particular reaction
> and they instead find such a maximum, this usually means that the reaction
> they are trying to model is actually not concerted and may go through two
> transition states and 1 intermediate.  I would think that one needs to go
> to extreme measures to find a second-order saddle point;

A well stated response Trevor.  A couple papers where theoreticians concede that
experimentalists may have seen evidence of a second order saddle point are:

``The Anomalous Behavior of the Zeeman Anticrossing Spectra of \~A
$^1A_u$ Acetylene: Theoretical Considerations,'' G. Vacek,
C. D. Sherrill, Y. Yamaguchi and H. F. Schaefer, {\it J. Chem. Phys.}
{\bf 104}, 1774-8 (1996).

``The \~A $^1A_u$ State and the $T_2$ Potential Surface of Acetylene:
Implications for Triplet Perturbations in the Flourescence Spectra of
the \~A State,'' C. D. Sherrill, G. Vacek, Y. Yamaguchi,
H. F. Schaefer, J. F. Stanton and J. Gauss, {\it J. Chem. Phys.} {\bf
104}, 8507-15 (1996).

Regards,
George Vacek
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
vacek@schrodinger.com (503)299-1150 http://www.schrodinger.com/~vacek/
Schrodinger, Inc., 1500 SW First Ave., Suite 1180, Portland, OR 97201

Every culture that has lost myth has lost, by the same token, its
natural, healthy creativity.
-- Friedrich Nietzsche "The Birth of Tragedy" 1872
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Oct  3 18:47:47 2000
Received: from asnmail.asc.edu (asnmail.asc.edu [129.66.12.7])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA10462
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:47:47 -0400
Received: from localhost (asnmaz01@localhost)
	by asnmail.asc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA29028
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:02:58 -0500
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:02:58 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Mark A. Zottola" <asnmaz01@asnmail.asc.edu>
To: CCL <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Fractional to Cartesian converter
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010031758570.28907-100000@asnmail.asc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

I regret that this is problably an overly-answered question. However, I
can not get to the CCL web site to search this out.

I am looking for a converter which will take a space group and a set of
fractional coordinates and convert them into cartesian coordinates. 

Thanks,

Mark



