From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu May 10 10:28:31 2001
Received: from postoffice.mail.cornell.edu ([132.236.56.7])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4AESVI13913
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:28:31 -0400
Received: from cornell.edu (sweet1.foodsci.cornell.edu [132.236.147.65])
	by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA09795;
	Thu, 10 May 2001 10:28:29 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: dwood@cornell.edu
Message-ID: <3AFAA1F9.591A9267@cornell.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 10:13:13 -0400
From: "Dr. Richard L. Wood" <rlw28@cornell.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "chemistry@ccl.net" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:shorter bond = Weaker/More reactive bond?
References: <p05010410b71f22715163@[155.198.234.86]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi all

I don't claim to be an "expert" on organic chemistry or reactions.
That being said as a disclaimer, I would think that C=C bonds
are shorter and more reactive than C-C bonds.

As I recall from sophomore Organic Chemistry, alkanes do very
little reaction wise and are pretty inert chemically.  On the other
hand, alkenes are much more reactive due to the (second) pi bond.

That's my example.

Richard

"Rzepa, Henry" wrote:

> I came across a claim last week that in a  square planar
> Pd complex for which a structure had been determined, the
> shorter of two  Pd-ligand bonds was also the more labile.
>
> Shorter of course cannot be formally equated with "more reactive",
> but in general we tend to assume that if a bond is to break, the
> "least motion" path is normally favoured.
>
> There are of course many examples of non-least-motion
> reactions, but  does anyone know of any (other)
> clear cut cases of bonds where
> the shorter bond is the more reactive?
> --
>
> Henry Rzepa. +44 (0)20 7594 5774 (Office) +44 (0870) 132-3747 (eFax)
> Dept. Chemistry, Imperial College, London, SW7  2AY, UK.
> http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/
>

--
Richard L. Wood, Ph. D.
Physical/Computational Chemist
Post-doctoral Associate
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu May 10 11:12:46 2001
Received: from deluge.umist.ac.uk ([130.88.120.66])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4AFCkI14358
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 10 May 2001 11:12:46 -0400
Received: from warp.ch.umist.ac.uk ([130.88.153.104] helo=umist.ac.uk)
	by deluge.umist.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1)
	id 14xs7Q-0001PQ-00
	for chemistry@ccl.net; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:12:44 +0100
Sender: malcolm@ccl.net
Message-ID: <3AFAB069.2F9464C8@umist.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 16:14:49 +0100
From: noj malcolm <n.malcolm@umist.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; OSF1 V4.0 alpha)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:shorter bond = Weaker/More reactive bond?
References: <p05010410b71f22715163@[155.198.234.86]> <3AFAA1F9.591A9267@cornell.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

there is a recent paper by molina et. al ("recognizing a triple bond
between main group atoms" TCA 2001) that looks at the Ga-Ga bond an a
few systems. though they don't directly examine teh reactivity they do
look at  external criteria of 'single' 'double' and 'triple' bonds -
based on consideration of the conditional pair density. this shows that
systems with formal double bonds (for HGa-GaH) is considerably longer
(2.78 vs. 2.53 Ang at the HF/6-311++G** level) than the formal single
bond in H2Ga-GaH2


noj
-- 
  Dr. N.O.J. Malcolm                       n.malcolm@umist.ac.uk
  Chemistry Department                   
  UMIST, Sackville Street
  Manchester, England. M60 1QD

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu May 10 10:21:13 2001
Received: from mailrelay1.lrz-muenchen.de ([129.187.254.101])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4AELDI13869
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:21:13 -0400
Received: from sun1.lrz-muenchen.de by mailrelay1.lrz-muenchen.de with ESMTP for chemistry@ccl.net; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:21:10 +0200
Received: from localhost (ui22204@localhost)
	by sun1.lrz-muenchen.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA18365
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:21:09 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: sun1.lrz-muenchen.de: ui22204 owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 16:21:09 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Eugene Leitl <Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
X-X-Sender:  <ui22204@sun1.lrz-muenchen.de>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Re: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape... (fwd)
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.4.31.0105101620340.17681-100000@sun1.lrz-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 10:04:01 -0400
From: Bob Drzyzgula <bob@drzyzgula.org>
To: beowulf@beowulf.org
Subject: Re: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...

Wes Bauske was kind enough to point out that
I could do the Pentium 4 system a bit more
cheaply. I'd missed the fact that Pentium 4
boards are available with 4 RIMM slots, so one
can use 256MB RIMMs, which are available at about
half the price per MB over the 512MB modules.
Thus, it should be possible to do a 1.5GHz Pentium
4 system for a core (CPU+MB+Memory) cost of around
$1300 or so. A 1.7GHz system would cost around
$100 more than that. Updated tables below. Also,
I added SPECfp2000/K$. Fascinating how the Pentium 4
comes out second in each one of these tables...

Thanks, Wes.

--Bob

Sorted in declining order of SPECfp2000:

                                                     Sfp/
Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
-------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)

Sorted in declining order of SPECint2000:

                                                     Sfp/
Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
-------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)

Sorted in order of increasing cost:

                                                     Sfp/
Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
-------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)
PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)

Sorted in declining order of SPECfp2000/K$
                                                     Sfp/
Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
-------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu May 10 13:36:35 2001
Received: from pesto.q1.fcen.uba.ar ([157.92.31.27])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4AHa2I15647
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 10 May 2001 13:36:05 -0400
Received: from localhost (alec@localhost)
	by pesto.q1.fcen.uba.ar (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05348
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 10 May 2001 11:24:58 -0300
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 11:24:58 -0300 (ART)
From: Alejandro Crespo <alec@pesto.q1.fcen.uba.ar>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Open shell TDDFT
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10105100949440.5203-100000@pesto.q1.fcen.uba.ar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear Sirs:
	I'm working with radical cations and I'm trying to compute their
UV-VIS spectra with TD DFT with Gaussian 98.
We have tried as a bench mark the OH radical and we have some troubles (we
got an error message with large basis sets and when we succeded in getting
a result one of the excitation energies was absurd)
Any suggestion will we helpfull
Thank you very much
Yours sincerely
Alejandro Crespo 





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu May 10 16:33:09 2001
Received: from prserv.net ([32.97.166.34])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4AKX9I17405
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:33:09 -0400
Received: from attglobal.net (slip-32-101-131-207.in.us.prserv.net[32.101.131.207])
          by prserv.net (out4) with SMTP
          id <200105102032552040369ij2e>; Thu, 10 May 2001 20:32:56 +0000
Message-ID: <3AFAA73A.F6D2C5FB@attglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 15:35:38 +0100
From: jmmckel@attglobal.net
Reply-To: jmmckel@attglobal.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en]C-CCK-MCD   (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eugene Leitl <Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
CC: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:FYI: Current SPECfp landscape... (fwd)
References: <Pine.SOL.4.31.0105101620340.17681-100000@sun1.lrz-muenchen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

FYI:

An Intel/P4/1.7GHZ with 256 MByte Rambus memory, high quality fan, tested is $799 [case and P4 power supply add
$99] can be had from a quality source, WWW.JNCS.COM.  I've been using them for years.

John McKelvey

Eugene Leitl wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 10:04:01 -0400
> From: Bob Drzyzgula <bob@drzyzgula.org>
> To: beowulf@beowulf.org
> Subject: Re: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
>
> Wes Bauske was kind enough to point out that
> I could do the Pentium 4 system a bit more
> cheaply. I'd missed the fact that Pentium 4
> boards are available with 4 RIMM slots, so one
> can use 256MB RIMMs, which are available at about
> half the price per MB over the 512MB modules.
> Thus, it should be possible to do a 1.5GHz Pentium
> 4 system for a core (CPU+MB+Memory) cost of around
> $1300 or so. A 1.7GHz system would cost around
> $100 more than that. Updated tables below. Also,
> I added SPECfp2000/K$. Fascinating how the Pentium 4
> comes out second in each one of these tables...
>
> Thanks, Wes.
>
> --Bob
>
> Sorted in declining order of SPECfp2000:
>
>                                                      Sfp/
> Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
> -------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
> Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
> Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
> PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
> UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
> Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
> UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)
>
> Sorted in declining order of SPECint2000:
>
>                                                      Sfp/
> Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
> -------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
> PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
> Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
> Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
> Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
> UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
> UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)
>
> Sorted in order of increasing cost:
>
>                                                      Sfp/
> Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
> -------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
> Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
> Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
> UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
> Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
> UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)
> PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
>
> Sorted in declining order of SPECfp2000/K$
>                                                      Sfp/
> Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
> -------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
> Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
> Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
> Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
> UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
> PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
> UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu May 10 16:36:57 2001
Received: from prserv.net ([32.97.166.32])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4AKauI17429
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:36:56 -0400
Received: from attglobal.net (<unknown.domain>[32.101.131.207])
          by prserv.net (out2) with SMTP
          id <2001051020365420205cvsure>; Thu, 10 May 2001 20:36:55 +0000
Message-ID: <3AFAA823.DAD1934C@attglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 15:39:32 +0100
From: jmmckel@attglobal.net
Reply-To: jmmckel@attglobal.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en]C-CCK-MCD   (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eugene Leitl <Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
CC: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:FYI: Current SPECfp landscape... (fwd)
References: <Pine.SOL.4.31.0105101620340.17681-100000@sun1.lrz-muenchen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sorry..

In my previous post I forgot to mention that an ASUS/P4T motherboard is included...  Mobo/1.7GHZ CPU/Fan/256MBytes
RambusMemory=> $799.

John McKelvey

Eugene Leitl wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 10:04:01 -0400
> From: Bob Drzyzgula <bob@drzyzgula.org>
> To: beowulf@beowulf.org
> Subject: Re: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
>
> Wes Bauske was kind enough to point out that
> I could do the Pentium 4 system a bit more
> cheaply. I'd missed the fact that Pentium 4
> boards are available with 4 RIMM slots, so one
> can use 256MB RIMMs, which are available at about
> half the price per MB over the 512MB modules.
> Thus, it should be possible to do a 1.5GHz Pentium
> 4 system for a core (CPU+MB+Memory) cost of around
> $1300 or so. A 1.7GHz system would cost around
> $100 more than that. Updated tables below. Also,
> I added SPECfp2000/K$. Fascinating how the Pentium 4
> comes out second in each one of these tables...
>
> Thanks, Wes.
>
> --Bob
>
> Sorted in declining order of SPECfp2000:
>
>                                                      Sfp/
> Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
> -------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
> Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
> Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
> PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
> UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
> Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
> UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)
>
> Sorted in declining order of SPECint2000:
>
>                                                      Sfp/
> Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
> -------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
> PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
> Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
> Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
> Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
> UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
> UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)
>
> Sorted in order of increasing cost:
>
>                                                      Sfp/
> Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
> -------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
> Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
> Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
> UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
> Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
> UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)
> PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
>
> Sorted in declining order of SPECfp2000/K$
>                                                      Sfp/
> Processor                   MHz  L2    Si Sfp core $  K$  Notes
> -------------------------  ---- ----- --- --- ------ --- ----------
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1300   256 491 374    520 719 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM)
> Pentium 4                  1700   256 586 608  1,400 434 (D850GB, RDRAM)
> AMD Athlon (Thunderbird)   1330   256 539 445  2,000 223 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM)
> Pentium III (Coppermine)   1000   256 428 314  1,900 165 (VC820, RDRAM)
> Alpha (21264)               833  8192 533 644  9,000  72 (UP2000+, est)
> UltraSPARC III              750  8192 395 421  8,500  50 (Ocelot)
> PA-8700                     750  N/A  603 581 14,000  42 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1)
> UltraSPARC II               480  8192 234 291 10,000  29 (AXdp)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net



