From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sun Jul 29 14:13:37 2001
Received: from web4903.mail.yahoo.com ([216.115.106.28])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f6TIDb505875
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 14:13:37 -0400
Message-ID: <20010729181337.1314.qmail@web4903.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [66.81.23.53] by web4903.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 11:13:37 PDT
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 11:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sengen Sun <sengensun@yahoo.com>
Subject: phase/orbitals
To: chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I received 9 messages for my posting of July 16 on
this subject.

One of them requested a summary of discussions on MO
control theories. 

Two of them asked me not to disclose their discussions
to the public. 

The remaining 6 messages provided me more explanations
on the essence of MOs. I (a fast learner) have to
accept that single MOs have no physical meaning, have
no physical existence, and are not observable. Thanks
to all about 20 people who responded in the last two
months. 

Some people of this list suggested me that the MO
control is a kind of quantum phenomena that can not be
logically explained using our human languages. We have
to accept them (without a logical understanding). This
worries me. 

Dewar used strong words “hypnotic effect” to describe
the MO phase control. His severe remarks upset me.
Others attempted to describe what the actual
controlling power is (e.g., Bader & MacDougall, JACS
1985, 107, 6788). Further, many experimental facts
violate the MO control theories (theories violate
facts?). Why don’t we scrutinize the opposite opinions
and the experimental facts in a logical way based on
the essence of MOs? 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sun Jul 29 21:25:54 2001
Received: from mx1.ustc.edu.cn ([61.132.182.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6U1Pr514334
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 21:25:53 -0400
Received: from mail.ustc.edu.cn (mail.ustc.edu.cn [202.38.64.10])
	by mx1.ustc.edu.cn (8.8.7/8.8.6) with SMTP id KAA23700
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 10:19:28 -0800
Received: (qmail 2221 invoked by uid 1221); 30 Jul 2001 01:10:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:10:01 +0800 (CST)
From: Jianmiao Fan <fan@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
X-X-Sender:  <fan@mail>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: substitute atom by fragment in molden3.6
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.31L2A.0107300858450.965-100000@mail>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCLers,
   I wonder why molden3.6 told me 'ZMAT NOT parsed:
error opening fragment file !' when I substitute an
atom by read a file. That file was in Z-Mat Gaussian
formation and was a complete molecule.
   It will be highly appreciated for any suggestion.

With My Best Regards,

Sincerely yours,
         Jim Fan

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Fan Jianmiao (Jim Fan)
Department of Chemistry
East Campus,USTC
Hefei,Anhui,230026,P.R.China

Tel:86-551-3654322(dorm)
    86-551-3606640(lab)
E_mail:fan@mail.ustc.edu.cn

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sun Jul 29 21:48:37 2001
Received: from mx1.ustc.edu.cn ([61.132.182.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6U1mZ514936
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 21:48:36 -0400
Received: from mail.ustc.edu.cn (mail.ustc.edu.cn [202.38.64.10])
	by mx1.ustc.edu.cn (8.8.7/8.8.6) with SMTP id KAA24436
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 10:40:32 -0800
Received: (qmail 3878 invoked by uid 1221); 30 Jul 2001 01:31:05 -0000
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:31:05 +0800 (CST)
From: Jianmiao Fan <fan@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
X-X-Sender:  <fan@mail>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: suggestion for optimizing structures
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.31L2A.0107300910451.965-100000@mail>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCLers,
   I want to develope my knowledge of structure optimization.
My current work encounted so many problems when doing opt
with g98. I want to know more about methods of searching
minmum with g98. Rational Function Optimization during Berny
optimizions is not suitable for super molecular system that
I am studying. For I got a lot of negative frequencies by
this default method.
   Could any one give me some suggestions on how to develope
my optimization skills? Is there any good book or paper on them?
Thank you very much.

With My Best Regards,

Sincerely yours,
         Jim Fan

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Fan Jianmiao (Jim Fan)
Department of Chemistry
East Campus,USTC
Hefei,Anhui,230026,P.R.China

Tel:86-551-3654322(dorm)
    86-551-3606640(lab)
E_mail:fan@mail.ustc.edu.cn
Http://boc.ustc.edu.cn

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


