From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 16 03:20:55 2001
Received: from lancelot.imb-jena.de ([192.124.248.76])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f9G7KsB28174
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 03:20:54 -0400
Received: (from pineda@localhost)
	by lancelot.imb-jena.de (SGI-8.9.3/8.8.8) id JAA12470
	for chemistry@ccl.net; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:20:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: pineda@imb-jena.de (Felipe Pineda)
Message-Id: <10110160920.ZM206492@lancelot.imb-jena.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:20:54 +0000
In-Reply-To: Eugene Leitl <Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
        "CCL:FYI:Call-For-Participation: 2nd Workshop on Linux Cluster for SuperComputing (fwd)" (Oct 11,  5:48pm)
References: <Pine.SOL.4.33.0110111748070.6169-100000@sun4.lrz-muenchen.de>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: ccalculation of nmr order parameters
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

dear CCLers:

i shall be very grateful for any pointer or reference to ways of calculating
(better would be an existing implementation of such a method) generalized
squared order parameters (S^2, from nmr relaxation measurements) on the basis
of mean atomic fluctuations derived from a several ns md trajectory at constant
temperature.

many thanks in advance for your attention and feedback.


best regards

felipe

-- 
**********************************************************************
* Felipe Pineda,PhD                                                  *
* Institut fuer Molekulare Biotechnologie                            *
* AG Theoretische Biophysik                                          *
* Beutenbergstrasse 11, Jena                Vox: +49-3641-65-6491    *
* Postfach 100 813, D-07708 Jena, Germany   Fax:            -6495    *
*                  web:  www.imb-jena.de/~pineda                     *
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
* DISCLAIMER: Unless indicated otherwise, everything in this note is *      
* my personal opinion, not an official statement of my employer      *      
**********************************************************************

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 16 04:36:54 2001
Received: from fyserv1.fy.chalmers.se ([129.16.110.66])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f9G8asB29975
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 04:36:54 -0400
Received: from fy.chalmers.se (ftf-pc32.fy.chalmers.se [129.16.112.162])
	by fyserv1.fy.chalmers.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA00229
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:37:21 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <3BCBF25E.F4BC2C61@fy.chalmers.se>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:39:59 +0200
From: Patrik Johansson <patrikj@fy.chalmers.se>
Organization: CTH
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [sv] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: sv
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Glass transition temperature
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Dear colleagues,

does anyone out there know of the applicability of computed torsional
barriers (by SE, HF, MP2 methods etc) about single bonds as a way to
predict glass transition temperatures (absolute or relative) for simple
polymers? The computations of course on oligomers.

Will summarize to the list.

all the best

/Patrik
-- 
Dr. Patrik Johansson
Scientist
Materials Physics
Chalmers University of Technology
412 96 Goteborg SWEDEN
patrikj@fy.chalmers.se
http://fy.chalmers.se/~jpatrik/

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 16 10:49:04 2001
Received: from prserv.net ([32.97.166.34])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f9GEmqB05021
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:49:04 -0400
Received: from attglobal.net (slip-32-101-104-243.in.us.prserv.net[32.101.104.243])
          by prserv.net (out4) with SMTP
          id <20011016144851204036so6be>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:48:51 +0000
Message-ID: <3BCBF67F.5FEFFCCA@attglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:57:35 +0100
From: jmmckel@attglobal.net
Reply-To: jmmckel@attglobal.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en]C-CCK-MCD   (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Corel Linux
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello..

Is there a Corel Linux user or two out there that could assist me in
straightening out a networking issue [so I can offload a lot of DFT
computation results and then install Red Hat Linux?]  Or..  can I just
install RH Linux on top of Corel Linux without damaging/endangering the
DFT results I want to save?

Thanks!

John McKelvey


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Mon Oct 15 23:48:14 2001
Received: from web20704.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.177])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id f9G3mDB24983
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 23:48:13 -0400
Message-ID: <20011016034813.51668.qmail@web20704.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [64.165.229.61] by web20704.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:48:13 PDT
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Masakatsu Watanabe <masakatsu_w@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: CCL:molecular dynamic: wich program?
To: Mirco Meniconi <mirco.me@tiscalinet.it>, chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <001201c153cf$2b88b600$3eda623e@mircomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Mirco, 

Check the web-site http://home.pacbell.net/masa_w.
Event though the web is still in the construction, you
can find the link to the book "Computational
Biophysics and Biochemistry" appendix. Check the
section B on the appendix, you can find the list of
the popular MD packages (each one has the link).

Hopefully, you can find it useful.

Masa Watanabe
--- Mirco Meniconi <mirco.me@tiscalinet.it> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm looking for a free program for bio-molecular
> dynamics simulations, capable to run under a
> multiprocessor system.
> could you send me the web-addres where I can find
> out this program?
> thanks for yours help. 

=====
=========================================================
Masakatsu Watanabe, Ph.D.    Wavefunction, Inc.
Scientific Developer         18401 Von Karman, Suite 370
E-mail:   masa@wavefun.com   Irvine, CA 92612, USA       
Phone:    949-955-2120           
FAX:      949-955-2118   Web: http://www.wavefun.com
===========================================================


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 16 21:05:16 2001
Received: from carbon.chem.ucla.edu ([128.97.35.55])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f9H15GB16327
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:05:16 -0400
Received: from Laurence.mbi.ucla.edu (pc-ll.chem.ucla.edu [128.97.35.245])
	by carbon.chem.ucla.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9H15Fq18064
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 18:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011016175929.0396ac48@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: lavelle/mbi.ucla.edu@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 18:08:26 -0700
To: CCL <chemistry@ccl.net>
From: Laurence Lavelle <lavelle@mbi.ucla.edu>
Subject: Orbital energies for 1st row transition metals.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

The following question relates to a first year chemistry course that I teach.

Cr ground state is [Ar]3d^5 4s^1

What would be the ground state for Cr^-1 ?
Explain the e- configuration and estimate the relative energy difference 
between Cr and Cr^-1.

Discussion and comments welcome.

Best,
Laurence Lavelle

   


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 16 21:46:27 2001
Received: from mailbox.engr.sc.edu ([129.252.21.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f9H1kQB17036
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:46:26 -0400
Received: from samay (samay.ee.sc.edu [129.252.22.248]) by mailbox.engr.sc.edu with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
	id 481DQ8N2; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:41:05 -0400
Message-ID: <000b01c156ac$eecc13c0$f816fc81@ee.sc.edu>
From: "derosa" <derosa@engr.sc.edu>
To: <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Universal Force Field (UFF)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:42:07 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200

Dear all:

        I am trying to figure out how the Universal Force Field is
parameterized in Cerius2, particularly the torsion and the inversion
interactions.  My source is the Paper of Rappe et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992
114, 10024 and the set of parameter shown in the force field UFF 1.02.

        According to what I understood from that paper, the torsional energy
is given by

E=1/2 V[1-cos(n*phi0)*cos(n*phi)]

It is a little obscure for me how this parameters are defined
For sp2 centers connected to another sp2 center n=2 and phi0 is 180, which
is my case.  so

E=1/2 V [1-cos(2*phi)]

My first question is how V is defined.  In the mentioned paper there are two
different sum rules depending on whether the center is sp2 or sp3 however
only for sp3 centers V is defined as a function of a "torsional barrier
factor" of each atoms which is the only parameter (I could find) in the
force field.  SO how is V defined (in cerius2) for sp2 centers, which is the
sum rule I should use?.

With respect to the inversion, Rappe et al indicates that the inversion
energy is given by

E=Kijkl( Co + C1 sin(Gamma)+ C2 cos(2Gamma))

However UFF, as implemented in cerius2 only offers two parameters, the
inversion barrier and the equilibrium inversion angle for each atoms.  How
the other parameters are obtained?, is the previous formula the one that is
used in cerius2?.

Any clarifying comment will be much appreciated.  You can send the answers
directly to me at derosa@engr.sc.edu I will summarize if there is any
interest.

Thank you very much for your help,

Pedro


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 16 14:02:57 2001
Received: from eden.rutgers.edu ([165.230.180.170])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f9GI2vB08743
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:02:57 -0400
Received: from eden.rutgers.edu (molly.envsci.rutgers.edu [165.230.5.148])
	by eden.rutgers.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E026726F7A
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:02:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3BCC78D0.7F983BC0@eden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:13:36 -0400
From: "Mary O'Connor" <mvoconn@eden.rutgers.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (Win98; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Water models
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Can anyone suggest a good, recent  review of the various models for
water (e.g.,TIP3P,etc.)? Thanks!

Mary O'Connor
Doctoral Candidate
Rutgers University
New Brunswick, NJ USA



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 16 17:00:16 2001
Received: from hotmail.com ([216.33.241.30])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f9GL0FB11946
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:00:16 -0400
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:00:10 -0700
Received: from 134.129.118.52 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:00:10 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [134.129.118.52]
From: "xin hu" <xxh0541@hotmail.com>
To: ngpeiling1@yahoo.com
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: charges needed in AutoDock3.0
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:00:10 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Message-ID: <F309hGLdsJHRp5gsG6e000064ca@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2001 21:00:10.0864 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B2BFF00:01C15685]

<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>Hi, Sorry for the late reply. I donot know if you installed the ADT, the graphic interface for AutoDock. You can assigned the Gasteiger-Marsili charges on the small molecules directly using ADT, or you can compute the charge&nbsp;using SYBYL or HyperChem, and then convert to the lig.pdbq format using some scripts that AutoDOck provided.</P>
<P>There are lots of reference about AutoDock, you may check the website of AutoDOck.</P>
<P>Hope help.</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Xin Hu<BR><BR></P><BR><BR><BR>---------------------------------------------------------- </DIV>Xin Hu 
<DIV></DIV>Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences 
<DIV></DIV>College of Pharmacy 
<DIV></DIV>North Dakota State University 
<DIV></DIV>Fargo, ND 58105 
<DIV></DIV>Tel: 701-231-8298(office) 
<DIV></DIV>701-231-4307(home) 
<DIV></DIV>701-231-7781(Fax) 
<DIV></DIV>E-mail: xin_hu@ndsu.nodak.edu 
<DIV></DIV>xxh0541@hotmail.com 
<DIV></DIV>Mail address: 
<DIV></DIV>13 Bison Court 
<DIV></DIV>Fargo, ND 58102 
<DIV></DIV>---------------------------------------------------------- 
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>----Original Message Follows---- 
<DIV></DIV>From: Ng Pei Ling <NGPEILING1@YAHOO.COM>
<DIV></DIV>To: xin hu <XXH0541@HOTMAIL.COM>
<DIV></DIV>Subject: Re: charges needed in AutoDock3.0 
<DIV></DIV>Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 01:24:03 -0700 (PDT) 
<DIV></DIV>MIME-Version: 1.0 
<DIV></DIV>Received: from [216.136.225.54] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBD8FF3C000C740043261D888E13607C40; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 01:24:32 -0700 
<DIV></DIV>Received: from [161.142.15.4] by web14902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 01:24:03 PDT 
<DIV></DIV>From ngpeiling1@yahoo.com Fri, 12 Oct 2001 01:25:46 -0700 
<DIV></DIV>Message-ID: &lt;20011012082403.71006.qmail@web14902.mail.yahoo.com&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>In-Reply-To: <F2385N9DTHXZKAIZRBK00002C10@HOTMAIL.COM>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Dear Xin Hu : 
<DIV></DIV>Can you help me to assign charges for small 
<DIV></DIV>molecule such as flavonoids ? My supervisor ask me to 
<DIV></DIV>do this before docking. But, I still don't know how. 
<DIV></DIV>Thanks if you can also send me some references for 
<DIV></DIV>autodock. 
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>--- xin hu <XXH0541@HOTMAIL.COM>wrote: 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; Hello, AutoDock user: 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; I have a question about the charges of 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; macromolecules used in AutoDock. Why 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; it must be integral? I got the error warning with 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; non-integral charges of 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; protein (for some residues such as GLU the charge is 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; -0.999 rather than 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; -1.0), but I can still run the AutoDock and nothing 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; different with the 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; result. The same thing for the ion such as Mg. I 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; assign an ab intio derived 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; charge with +0.8e (for example) rather than +2.0, It 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; is non-integral, but I 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; found it is working well. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; Would someone please tell me why? 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; Thanks for your help. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; Xin Hu 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; College of Pharmacy 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; North Dakota State University 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; Fargo, ND 58105 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>---------------------------------------------------------- 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>_________________________________________________________________ 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; -= This is automatically added to each message by 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; mailing script =- 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody | 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search | 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; Ftp: ftp.ccl.net | WWW: 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/ | Jan: jkl@ccl.net 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>__________________________________________________ 
<DIV></DIV>Do You Yahoo!? 
<DIV></DIV>Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. 
<DIV></DIV>http://personals.yahoo.com 
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></html>


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 16 13:01:59 2001
Received: from mailhost.univ-orleans.fr (IDENT:root@[194.167.30.130])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f9GH1xB07749
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:01:59 -0400
Received: from univ-orleans.fr (aneto.univ-orleans.fr [193.49.95.24])
          by mailhost.univ-orleans.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id TAA24627
          for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:01:58 +0200
Message-ID: <3BCC6A2B.5700E841@univ-orleans.fr>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:11:08 +0200
From: nicolas baurin <nicolas.baurin@univ-orleans.fr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [fr] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "chemistry@ccl.net" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: summary : known and future drug targets: literature references
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------7DFD91D11F9D5255E86C7D64"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


--------------7DFD91D11F9D5255E86C7D64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dear CCLer's,
thanks a lot for all who reply to my question about litterature
references citing the number of now known drug targets and an estimation
of future drug target from genome data: i got many mail giving personal
estimations and you'll find below the literature references i received.
Concerning the drug trial failure, I found a web reference at
http://innovation.phrma.org ("Only five in 5,000 compounds that enter
preclinical testing make it to human testing. One of these five tested
in people is approved").

Eric Vangrevelinghe wrote
    http://www.bcg.com/publications/files/genomics.pdf

    Drews, J. Drug discovery: A historical perspective [Review].
(Science.
    287(5460):1960-1964, 2000 Mar 17).

    Caron et al. Chemogenomic approaches to drug discovery. (Current
Opinion
    in Chemical Biology 2001, 5:464-470).

--
Nicolas Baurin

Doctorant
Laboratoire de Chimiométrie - Modélisation Moléculaire
Institut de Chimie Organique et Analytique, UMR 6005
http://www.univ-orleans.fr/SCIENCES/ICOA/
Université d'Orléans, BP 6759
45067 ORLEANS Cedex 2, France
Tel: (33+) 2 38 49 45 77


--------------7DFD91D11F9D5255E86C7D64
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Dear CCLer's,
<br>thanks a lot for all who reply to my question about litterature references
citing the number of now known drug targets and an estimation of future
drug target from genome data: i got many mail giving personal estimations
and you'll find below the literature references i received. Concerning
the drug trial failure, I found a web reference at <A HREF="http://innovation.phrma.org">http://innovation.phrma.org</A>
("Only five in 5,000 compounds that enter preclinical testing make it to
human testing. One of these five tested in people is approved").
<p><u>Eric Vangrevelinghe wrote</u>
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <A HREF="http://www.bcg.com/publications/files/genomics.pdf">http://www.bcg.com/publications/files/genomics.pdf</A>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Drews, J. Drug discovery: A historical perspective
[Review]. (Science.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 287(5460):1960-1964, 2000 Mar 17).
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Caron et al. Chemogenomic approaches to drug discovery.
(Current Opinion
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; in Chemical Biology 2001, 5:464-470).
<p>--
<br>Nicolas Baurin
<p>Doctorant
<br>Laboratoire de Chimiom&eacute;trie - Mod&eacute;lisation Mol&eacute;culaire
<br>Institut de Chimie Organique et Analytique, UMR 6005
<br><A HREF="http://www.univ-orleans.fr/SCIENCES/ICOA/">http://www.univ-orleans.fr/SCIENCES/ICOA/</A>
<br>Universit&eacute; d'Orl&eacute;ans, BP 6759
<br>45067 ORLEANS Cedex 2, France
<br>Tel: (33+) 2 38 49 45 77
<br>&nbsp;</html>

--------------7DFD91D11F9D5255E86C7D64--



