From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 03:20:38 2002
Received: from smtp.csc.fi ([193.166.0.99])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2M8Kap11735
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 03:20:37 -0500
Received: from ISOSIRRI (dhcp-56.csc.fi [193.166.2.56])
	by smtp.csc.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3/CSC) with ESMTP id KAA17142;
	Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:20:27 +0200
From: "Leif Laaksonen" <Leif.Laaksonen@csc.fi>
To: "'Rick Venable'" <rvenable@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>,
   "'CCL'" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Cc: "'Dr. Richard L. Wood'" <rlw28@cornell.edu>,
   "'Jim Phillips'" <jim@ks.uiuc.edu>
Subject: RE: trajectory file conversion (update)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:19:47 +0200
Message-ID: <002401c1d17a$54426fe0$3802a6c1@ISOSIRRI>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0203212117330.16934-100000@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>


I'm sorry but I made a mistake because I was in the believe that 
we talked about the representation in which the trajectories are
saved on the the disk. The internal representation inside CHARMM/CHARMm
is REAL*8 but the trajectories are saved on the disk in REAL*4.
Am I right?

-leif laaksonen

-----Original Message-----
From: Computational Chemistry List [mailto:chemistry-request@ccl.net] On
Behalf Of Rick Venable
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:50 AM
To: CCL
Cc: Dr. Richard L. Wood; Jim Phillips
Subject: CCL:trajectory file conversion (update)


The f.p. difference I mentioned for CHARMM vs. CHARMm would seem to be
historical; both use double precision (REAL*8) for coordinate and other
f.p. numbers, and have for some time (years).  I have not yet determined
why I had problems with flipdcd previously-- but I plan to try again
> from source (rather than pre-compiled Linux binary).

I should also note that the trajectory transfer format (produced by DYNA
FORMAT, converted back to binary via DYNA UNFORMAT) was changed at ca.
CHARMM v. 27, in a way that lost backwards compatibility.  It is
strongly recommended that the same CHARMM version be used on both
machine types in order to accomplish trajectory transfer via this
mechanism.

Finally, I should note that while CHARMM is not free, it is available as
academically licensed source for a modest fee, a well crafted letter,
and a bit of patience.  Here's the information from the Karplus group:

	-----------------------------------------------------

We distribute the source code of the CHARMM program with documentation
to individual academic research groups for a $600 licensing fee. CHARMM
runs on a variety of UNIX workstations, including the SG Indigo
machines. No graphics are necessary. The present version of the program
being distributed is C28.

The license is issued to the head of a laboratory or research group.
Please send a letter with the full name and title of the professor in
charge of your group and formal mailing address. Describe briefly the
kind of research for which you intend to use the CHARMM program and the
computers you will be using. The letter should be addressed to:

The CHARMM Development Project
Professor Martin Karplus
Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology
12 Oxford Street
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

	-----------------------------------------------------


=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Rick Venable           29/500
FDA/CBER/OVRR Biophysics Lab
1401 Rockville Pike    HFM-419
Rockville, MD  20852-1448  U.S.A.
(301) 496-1905   Rick_Venable@nih.gov
ALT email:  rvenable@speakeasy.org =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=



-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To
Admins MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher:
gopher.ccl.net 70
Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan:
jkl@ccl.net






From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 06:13:24 2002
Received: from dalton.quimica.unlp.edu.ar ([163.10.18.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MBDLp16226
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 06:13:23 -0500
Received: from bilbo.quimica.unlp.edu.ar (jubert4.quimica.unlp.edu.ar [163.10.18.18])
	by dalton.quimica.unlp.edu.ar (8.10.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g2MBD8Y26320
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:13:08 -0300
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020322075733.009dd370@dalton.quimica.unlp.edu.ar>
X-Sender: pis_diez@dalton.quimica.unlp.edu.ar
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:13:52 -0300
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: Reinaldo Pis Diez <pis_diez@quimica.unlp.edu.ar>
Subject: MullPop: a program to do a Mulliken Population Analysis within
  Gaussian98
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

	Dear ccl'ers,

		Quite recently a post to the list was looking for some program to do the 
part of the MPA that Gaussian 9x doesn't. Well, I've just finished a 
program that I called MullPop and does exactly this task.
		You can have a look at 
http://www.quimica.unlp.edu.ar/cequinor/rpd_en.htm, under the "Software 
development" section, where you'll find a readme file describing the 
program and a tar.gz file to download the source if you wish.
		Regards,

							Reinaldo
         


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 08:41:56 2002
Received: from ucidoor.unitedcatalysts.com ([208.23.162.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MDftp19245
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:41:55 -0500
Received: by ucidoor.unitedcatalysts.com; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id IAA04904; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:41:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 10.1.0.50 by ucismtp02.unitedcatalysts.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:39:36 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Received: from lvlxch01.unitedcatalysts.com ([10.16.100.88])
 by lvlmail.unitedcatalysts.com (PMDF V6.0-24 #41777)
 with ESMTP id <0GTD00M7WN45QQ@lvlmail.unitedcatalysts.com>; Fri,
 22 Mar 2002 08:36:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: by lvlxch01.unitedcatalysts.com with Internet Mail Service
 (5.5.2650.21)	id <G847SRKV>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:40:04 -0500
Content-return: allowed
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:40:03 -0500
From: "Shobe, Dave" <dshobe@sud-chemieinc.com>
Subject: G98W: all solvents the same?
To: "'CCL'" <chemistry@ccl.net>, "'help@gaussian.com'" <help@gaussian.com>
Message-id: 
 <157A51F55AAAD3119CD70008C7B1629D01C15AFD@lvlxch01.unitedcatalysts.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id g2MDfup19246

Why do the following calculations using G98W's ICPM solvation model give the
same results?

#n geom=check guess=read chkbas scrf(isodensity,solvent=CCl4)

#n geom=check guess=read chkbas scrf(isodensity,solvent=methanol)

If "Epsi" in the output is the dielectric constant, it appears that both
solvents have been replaced by water(?!)

--David Shobe
Süd-Chemie Inc.
phone (502) 634-7409
fax     (502) 634-7724
email  dshobe@sud-chemieinc.com

Don't bother flaming me: I'm behind a firewall.



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 08:52:07 2002
Received: from uranium.camsoft.com ([198.112.109.92])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MDq7p19338
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:52:07 -0500
Received: from potassium (172.17.3.55) by uranium.camsoft.com (Worldmail 1.3.167); 22 Mar 2002 08:52:02 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:52:00 -0500
From: "Support" <support@cambridgesoft.com>
Subject: RE: {Talisma#033-946} Chem 3D Ultra 7.0 as a Gaussian interface.
To: "Laurence Lavelle" <lavelle@mbi.ucla.edu>, "CCL" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Message-ID: <2002322_@TLM196749_@TLM>
X-Mailer: Talisma Mail Component Version 2.5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id g2MDq7p19339

Just looking back at our correspondence with you, I have found that the three bugs you have reported and other suggestions have not been addressed in 7.0.  The main things that have been added to Chem3D since 5.0 are a GAMESS interface and Tinker.  Some bugs have been fixed, too.  R&D is aware of the items you have reported and we hope to address them in a future version, but it is not clear when that will be.

Regards,

Rich Talbot
Director, Technical Support
CambridgeSoft
support@cambridgesoft.com
<http://www.cambridgesoft.com/support/>

Do you want to know when software patches are available, the latest product problems and solutions, facts, tricks and tips, tidbits and more?  Then sign up for our FREE technical support newsletter at: http://www.cambridgesoft.com/support/nl/new.cfm



 >-----Original Message-----
 >From:		Laurence Lavelle[lavelle@mbi.ucla.edu]
 >Date:		Thursday, March 21, 2002  06:54 PM
 >To:		CCL[chemistry@ccl.net]
 >Subject:	Chem 3D Ultra 7.0 as a Gaussian interface.
 >
 >
 >I tried using Chem 3D version 5 as a Gaussian interface some time back
 >but 
 >it was full of bugs.
 >
 >Anyone having successful use of Chem 3D Ultra 7.0 as a Gaussian
 >interface ?
 >In particular for pdb files ?
 >
 >Thanks,
 >Laurence
 >
 >
 >




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu Mar 21 22:02:37 2002
Received: from sina.com ([202.108.35.241])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id g2M32ap02201
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 22:02:37 -0500
Received: (qmail 21285 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2002 02:58:49 -0000
Message-ID: <20020322025849.21284.qmail@sina.com>
From: t218gy <t218gy@sina.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: About charge analysis in Gaussian98
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:58:49 +0800
X-Mailer: SinaMail 3.0Beta (FireToad)
X-Priority: 3

Dear Sir,

When I use the Guassian98 to do the charge analysis,the program need the radii of the Fe atom. I don't know how to input the the radii of Fe atom. My input line is belows:

#P HF/STO-3G SCFCON=5 SCFCYC=300 EXTRABASIS POP=(MK,READRADII) IOP(6/33=2)

Thanks in advance.

Yi Gao
Nanjing Univ. P.R.China

______________________________________

===================================================================
ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn)
ÐÂÀË·ÖÀàÐÅÏ¢£º¶þÊÖÊÐ³¡×ßÒ»×ß£¬¸Ã³öÊÖÊ±¾Í³öÊÖ£¡ (http://classad.sina.com.cn/2shou/)


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 08:38:41 2002
Received: from mmb1.vsnl.net.in ([202.54.1.72])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MDcep19185
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:38:40 -0500
Received: from bom2.vsnl.net.in (unknown [203.199.88.71])
	by mmb1.vsnl.net.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28827D6F
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 19:08:24 +0530 (IST)
Message-ID: <3C9B311D.3F09E57C@bom2.vsnl.net.in>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:56:53 +0530
From: meenatul <meenatul@bom2.vsnl.net.in>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCL <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Histidine
X-Priority: 2 (High)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To All
Few days back by Dr David van der Spoel asked the  question, regarding
the state of histidine in proteins. I am also interested in knowing the
answer. In what state Histidine should be modeled ? whether the two
neutral isoforms or the protonated form? Especially if you are
interested in using a physiological pH.
Thanks
Meena





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 03:56:49 2002
Received: from omega.physchem.kth.se ([130.237.52.156])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2M8ump13258
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 03:56:49 -0500
Received: from [130.237.52.42] (130.237.52.42) by omega.physchem.kth.se (MX
          V5.1-A An6n) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:01:02 +0100
X-Sender: tore@omega.physchem.kth.se
Message-ID: <v03110718b8c093dc409a@[130.237.52.42]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:55:16 +0200
X-MX-Warning:   Warning -- Invalid "To" header.
To: peterc@server.ccl.net
From: Tore Brinck <tore@physchem.kth.se>
Subject: CCL:StepSize
CC: chemistry@ccl.net




On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Stanislav Ivan wrote:

> I tried to reduce the step size during optimisation in gaussian98 -
> opt=(StepSize=10) but but it doesn't work.I allways get the error
> message about this keyword.But in the g98 manual I found exactly this
> keyword.
> All comments are appreciated.
> >
StepSize=N command doesn't work. Use IOp(1/8=N).
Marek


-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net

Tore Brinck
Physical Chemistry
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 Stockholm
Phone: +46 8 790 82 10
Home:  +46 8 655 85 52
Fax:    +46 8 790 8207
Cell:  +46 707 99 26 84
E-mail: tore@physchem.kth.se




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 10:04:37 2002
Received: from sainfoin.saclay.cea.fr ([132.166.192.126])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MF4ap21977
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:04:36 -0500
Received: from araneus.SACLAY.CEA.FR (araneus.saclay.cea.fr [132.166.192.110])
	by sainfoin.saclay.cea.fr (8.12.2/8.12.2/CEAnet-Internet.1.0) with ESMTP id g2MF5jG8027090
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:05:46 +0100 (MET)
Received: from silene.saclay.cea.fr (unverified) by araneus.SACLAY.CEA.FR
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.10) with ESMTP id <T59cb2dc26684a6c06e378@araneus.SACLAY.CEA.FR> for <chemistry@ccl.net>;
 Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:01:03 +0100
Received: from pandora.saclay.cea.fr (pandora.saclay.cea.fr [132.166.23.28])
	by silene.saclay.cea.fr (8.12.2/8.12.2/CEAnet-Interne.1.0) with ESMTP id g2MF2Wmp029946
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:02:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: from pandora.saclay.cea.fr (pandora.saclay.cea.fr [132.166.23.28])
          by pandora.saclay.cea.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.2) with SMTP id QAA09090
          for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:04:03 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <200203221504.QAA09090@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:04:03 +0100 (MET)
From: Rodolphe Pollet <pollet@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>
Reply-To: Rodolphe Pollet <pollet@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>
Subject: PBC vs. cluster
To: chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-MD5: G48115pc2a3F/aQegBQsbQ==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc 

Hi everyone,

I am rather new in the field of classical Molecular Dynamics and i wonder what 
the pros and cons are between working on a very big cluster or choosing periodic 
boundary conditions. Don't you think there are some drawbacks in periodicity, 
especially if your potential is long-ranged ? Are big clusters really doomed 
because of Ewald correction or other tricks ? Are there any alternatives ?

Thanks,

Rodolphe Pollet.


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 11:20:54 2002
Received: from chinon.cnrs-orleans.fr ([163.9.6.107])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MGKrp24650
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:20:53 -0500
Received: (from hinsen@localhost)
	by chinon.cnrs-orleans.fr (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g2MGKEh12895;
	Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:20:14 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: chinon.cnrs-orleans.fr: hinsen set sender to hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr using -f
Sender: hinsen@chinon.cnrs-orleans.fr
To: Rodolphe Pollet <pollet@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:PBC vs. cluster
References: <200203221504.QAA09090@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>
From: Konrad Hinsen <hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr>
Date: 22 Mar 2002 17:20:13 +0100
In-Reply-To: <200203221504.QAA09090@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>
Message-ID: <m3wuw47ewy.fsf@chinon.cnrs-orleans.fr>
Lines: 18
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Rodolphe Pollet <pollet@pandora.saclay.cea.fr> writes:

> I am rather new in the field of classical Molecular Dynamics and i
> wonder what the pros and cons are between working on a very big
> cluster or choosing periodic boundary conditions. Don't you think

You don't say what kind of system you are working on. Basically you
must decide decide whether you are more worried by artificial
finite-size effects (e.g. surface tension) or by artificial
periodicity.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen                            | E-Mail: hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr
Centre de Biophysique Moleculaire (CNRS) | Tel.: +33-2.38.25.56.24
Rue Charles Sadron                       | Fax:  +33-2.38.63.15.17
45071 Orleans Cedex 2                    | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/
France                                   | Nederlands/Francais
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 11:24:13 2002
Received: from gandalf.cber.nih.gov ([128.231.52.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MGODp24827
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:24:13 -0500
Received: from localhost (rvenable@localhost) by gandalf.cber.nih.gov (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA18062; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:18:35 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:18:35 -0500
From: Rick Venable <rvenable@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
To: Leif Laaksonen <Leif.Laaksonen@csc.fi>
cc: "'CCL'" <chemistry@ccl.net>, "'Dr. Richard L. Wood'" <rlw28@cornell.edu>,
   "'Jim Phillips'" <jim@ks.uiuc.edu>
Subject: RE: trajectory file conversion (update)
In-Reply-To: <002401c1d17a$54426fe0$3802a6c1@ISOSIRRI>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0203221048140.17990-100000@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Leif Laaksonen wrote:
> I'm sorry but I made a mistake because I was in the believe that 
> we talked about the representation in which the trajectories are
> saved on the the disk. The internal representation inside CHARMM/CHARMm
> is REAL*8 but the trajectories are saved on the disk in REAL*4.
> Am I right?

Yes and no, it turns out.  While coordinates are converted to REAL*4 for
storage, unit cell data is stored as REAL*8 when the simulation used the
CRYSTAL facility for periodic boundary conditions.

For these trajectories, the 11th element of the 20 element INTEGER*4
header is set to 1, and the X, Y, and Z coordinate arrays are preceded
by a 6 element REAL*8 array for each stored trajectory frame.  I suspect
that may be the root cause of the problems I had with flipdcd.

=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Rick Venable           29/500
FDA/CBER/OVRR Biophysics Lab
1401 Rockville Pike    HFM-419
Rockville, MD  20852-1448  U.S.A.
(301) 496-1905   Rick_Venable@nih.gov
ALT email:  rvenable@speakeasy.org
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 11:41:27 2002
Received: from gandalf.cber.nih.gov ([128.231.52.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MGfRp25185
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:41:27 -0500
Received: from localhost (rvenable@localhost) by gandalf.cber.nih.gov (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA18040; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:35:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:35:50 -0500
From: Rick Venable <rvenable@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
To: Rodolphe Pollet <pollet@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:PBC vs. cluster
In-Reply-To: <200203221504.QAA09090@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0203221120480.17990-100000@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Rodolphe Pollet wrote:
> I am rather new in the field of classical Molecular Dynamics and i
> wonder what the pros and cons are between working on a very big
> cluster or choosing periodic boundary conditions. Don't you think
> there are some drawbacks in periodicity, especially if your
> potential is long-ranged ? Are big clusters really doomed because of
> Ewald correction or other tricks ? Are there any alternatives ?

There can be consequences of representing a non-periodic systems such as
protein in aqueous solution with periodic boundary conditions, but there
are also consequences to using a stochastic air:water boundary for a
protein in a sphere of water as well.  In both cases, an adequate
thickness of solvent surrounding the solute is needed to reduce the
impact of the boundary treament.  In periodic systems, one can add ions
to the solution to help screen out the longer range electrostatic
effects, esp. when using Ewald methods.

Particle-Mesh Ewald methods scale reasonably well on Linux clusters with
CHARMM and AMBER, but as for most MD codes, a higher speed node
interconnect such as Myrinet may be essential to get usable scaling on
these types of clusters.  Ethernet scaling under the 2.4 Linux kernel is
particularly bad; the 2.2 kernel with the 'tcpfix' patch is highly
recommended clusters using TCP/IP over ethernet.

=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Rick Venable           29/500
FDA/CBER/OVRR Biophysics Lab
1401 Rockville Pike    HFM-419
Rockville, MD  20852-1448  U.S.A.
(301) 496-1905   Rick_Venable@nih.gov
ALT email:  rvenable@speakeasy.org
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 11:42:30 2002
Received: from postoffice.mail.cornell.edu ([132.236.56.7])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MGgUp25226
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:42:30 -0500
Received: from cornell.edu ([128.84.182.122])
	by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA06339;
	Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:42:24 -0500 (EST)
Sender: richard@cornell.edu
Message-ID: <3C9B5EEF.2887C4A0@cornell.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:42:23 -0500
From: Richard Gillilan <reg8@cornell.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.16 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rodolphe Pollet <pollet@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>
CC: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:PBC vs. cluster
References: <200203221504.QAA09090@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Back when I did simulation of reactions in
solution, we used truncated octahedral 
boundary conditions because these were
supposedly less likely to bias calculations
by introducing periodicity. Problem is
that PBC's can actually introduce a 
significant computational overhead since
they are called in the inner loops of the
code. 

I'm especially interested in how people
handle periodicity when they are
simulating crystallization and do not
want to bias the results by assuming a
certain unit cell.


Richard Gillilan
MacCHESS
Cornell University

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 13:07:24 2002
Received: from mail-d.bcc.ac.uk ([144.82.100.24])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MI7Op26822
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:07:24 -0500
Received: from pop-c.ucl.ac.uk by mail-d.bcc.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer) with ESMTP;
          Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:07:12 +0000
Received: from ucl.ac.uk (chlorine.chem.ucl.ac.uk [128.40.76.17])
          by pop-c.ucl.ac.uk (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g2MI6lm14333;
          Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:06:47 GMT
Sender: mb@ucl.ac.uk
Message-ID: <3C9B712D.EC2B84A5@ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:00:13 +0000
From: Michael Brunsteiner <m.brunsteiner@ucl.ac.uk>
Organization: University College London
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP30)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Gillilan <reg8@cornell.edu>
CC: Rodolphe Pollet <pollet@pandora.saclay.cea.fr>, chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:PBC vs. cluster
References: <200203221504.QAA09090@pandora.saclay.cea.fr> <3C9B5EEF.2887C4A0@cornell.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean

Richard Gillilan wrote:
> 
> I'm especially interested in how people
> handle periodicity when they are
> simulating crystallization and do not
> want to bias the results by assuming a
> certain unit cell.

didn't read it myself but i think what you want could be in:
BERNASCONI et al., JOURNAL OF PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF SOLIDS  
56 (3-4): 501-505 MAR-APR 1995

===================================================================
According to convention there is a sweet and a bitter, a hot and a cold,
and according to convention, there is an order.  In truth, there are
atoms
and a void.
                -- Democritus, 400 B.C.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Brunsteiner
Centre for Theoretical and Computational Chemistry
University College London
mailto:m.brunsteiner@ucl.ac.uk
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~uccambr/
-------------------------------------------------------------------

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 22 10:28:42 2002
Received: from albert.unito.it ([130.192.119.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2MFSfp23285
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:28:41 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by albert.unito.it (8.12.2/8.12.2) id g2MFSaiu001888
	for chemistry@ccl.net; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:28:36 +0100
Received: from unito.it (chpc28.ch.unito.it [130.192.118.37])
	by albert.unito.it (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2MFSZ3H001847
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:28:35 +0100
Message-ID: <3C9B4D27.78C1CCF@unito.it>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:26:31 +0100
From: MSSC <mssc@unito.it>
Organization: Dip. Chimica IFM
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: MSSC2002 - II circular and application form
X-scanner: scanned by Inflex 1.0.9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

 International School of Advanced Study of the University of Torino

           Ab initio Modeling in Solid State Chemistry
                              MSSC2002

           http://www.chimifm.unito.it/teorica/mssc2002

               September 8-13, 2002 -Torino, Italy
            Director: R. Dovesi, University of Torino


  The Theoretical Chemistry Group of the Torino University organizes
a Summer School on the ab initio simulation of crystalline and
defective solids.

  Ab initio modeling has become an ever-increasing area of interest
in solid state chemistry and materials science. The software currently
available for the quantum-mechanical study of electronic properties of
crystalline systems satisfies some requirements that encourage its
widespread use on the part of a rapidly growing community of
non-specialized users (material scientists, crystallographers,
geologists, ...).
To fully exploit the potentialities of these powerful tools, however,
is not an easy task, and an assisted introduction to their use from
experts in the field may be beneficial.

  The MSSC School is addressed to PhD students with interests in
solid state chemistry, physics, materials science, surface science,
catalysis and provides an overview of the possibilities offered by
ab initio quantum mechanical techniques when applied to characterize
solid state materials.

  The present MSSC2002 School is intended as an introduction to
the use of CRYSTAL, one of the most popular general-purpose programs
for the study of crystalline solids, and the first which has been
distributed publicly.
Its aim is to give some general information about the fundamental
issues behind the code, but especially to provide attendants with the
practical skill for the clever use of the program in their field of
interest. The new version of CRYSTAL will be used as a reference both
in the morning lectures and in the afternoon tutorials.


GENERAL INFORMATION
Participation is restricted to 40 participants.
The school will be held from September 8th to September 13th at
the Chemistry Departments of the Torino University.
Registration is scheduled on Sunday, September 8th at 14.00 at
the University Guest House.
The morning sessions will be devoted to lectures by experts.
The afternoons will be dedicated to practical sessions.
In the tutorials it will be shown how to obtain information concerning
various observables using the CRYSTAL code.
Participants will have the opportunity to present posters,
that will be on display for the whole period and discussed during
a special session.


PARTICIPATION FEE
The participation fee is 400,00 €.
It includes:
1. accomodation at the University guest house in shared double room
   (seven nights, from Saturday 7th to Friday 13th September 2002,
   included)
2. lecture and tutorial notes
3. coffee break (morning) and lunch (from Monday 9th to Friday 13th
   September 2002)
4. all social events

Notes:
+ Dinner is NOT included.
+ A limited number of single rooms will be available on request.
  An additional fee of 100,00 Euro is required.
+ For non resident attendants the partecipation fee is 250,00 Euro
  (items 2-3-4 above, included).

For attendants who prefer an independent accomodation, the local
organizing committee will not take care of hotel reservation.

FINANCIAL AID
A limited number of grants are available to partially cover
participation costs (A participation contribution of 70,00 Euro
is required).
If funds are available, a maximum of 500,00 Euro will be given
for refunding travel costs to participants from less favourite
countries. Please note that preference in selecting participants
will be given to eligible candidates who can guarantee travel
coverage by their own local sources.
Attendants applying for grants should provide a recommendation
letter by their supervisor, group leader or a senior scientist.

MSSC2002 HOME PAGE
More detailed information (teachers, preliminary programme, ...)
can be found at the MSSC2002 web site, which has been completely
updated: http://www.chimifm.unito.it/teorica/mssc2002


The application form is either enclosed below in text format or
can be downloaded from the MSSC2002 web site.
The deadline is May 1st, 2002.


Deadlines and Contact Information:

Submission of application form by fax to +39-011-6707855:   May 1st
Notification of acceptance from the organizing committee:   May 15th
Submission of poster abstracts:                             July 15th

E-mail: mssc@unito.it
Telephone:+39 011 670 7561           Fax:+39 011 670 7855

Postal address:
MSSC2002
Dipartimento di Chimica IFM
Via Giuria, 5
I-10125 Torino, Italy



 *********** MSSC2002 - APPLICATION FORM *************

Please return this application form before May 1st, 2002, by fax to:
    MSSC2002
    Dip.to di Chimica IFM - University of Torino
    Fax: +39-011-6707855
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name:

Surname:                                              Gender:   [ ] M
[ ] F

Organization:

Position:
[ ] Graduate student                     [ ] PhD student
[ ] Postdoc                               [ ] Professor
[ ] Research scientist                   [ ] Other:

Address:

City:                                    Zip code:

State:                                   Country:

Phone:                                   Fax:

e-mail:

Are you a CRYSTAL user?        [ ] Yes          [ ] No

Current scientific activities:





Latest scientific pubblications (max 3):






[ ] I will present a poster

Request for financial assistance
(Please provide a recommendation letter by your supervisor,
group leader or senior scientist)

Participation fee:     [ ] Yes      [ ] No
(A limited number of grants are available to partially cover
participation costs (70,00€ of contribution are required).)

Travel costs:    [ ] Total    [ ] Partial    [ ] None
(If funds are available, a maximum of 500,00€ will be given for
refunding travel costs to participants from less favourite countries.
Please note that preference in selecting participants will be given
to eligible candidates who can guarantee travel coverage by their own
local sources.)


Applicant's Signature :                                     Date :
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




_____________________________________________________________________
For your security, this mail has been scanned and protected by Inflex



