From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Apr 26 01:56:41 2002
Received: from hotmail.com ([64.4.37.214])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3Q5ufA28391
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 01:56:41 -0400
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:56:30 -0700
Received: from 171.64.127.133 by pv2fd.pav2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 05:56:30 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [171.64.127.133]
From: "Bin Shan" <philipbshan@hotmail.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: why I could not get convergence even on the initial guess?
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 05:56:30 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F214oqFXfyY0QUUBPcZ00000081@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Apr 2002 05:56:30.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[1CAF3710:01C1ECE7]

I am calculating a system consists of 3 gold atoms and 1 sulfer 
atom.(originally,there should be more carbon and hydrgon to follow,but since 
I can not even get convergence on this simple system,I didn't go further.)I 
am using a LANL2DZ basis set for 3 gold atoms and 6-31G(d) for sulfer 
atoms.(I have tried adding SCF(MaxCyc=200),still doesn't work)However,the 
job terminates with the following error:(I am using 
Gaussian98RevA.11.2)Anyone has any idea what is wrong?help me out,please!
.......
<S**2> of initial guess= 0.7500
Requested convergence on RMS density matrix=1.00D-08 within  64 cycles.
Requested convergence on MAX density matrix=1.00D-06.
Virtual orbitals will be shifted by   0.200 hartree.
Defaulting to unpruned grid for atomic number  79.
Restarting incremental Fock formation.
Restarting incremental Fock formation.
Restarting incremental Fock formation.
 >>>>>>>>>> Convergence criterion not met.
SCF Done:  E(UB+HF-LYP) =  -804.520113362     A.U. after   65 cycles
             Convg  =    0.8395D-06             -V/T =  2.5258
             S**2   =   0.7554
Annihilation of the first spin contaminant:
S**2 before annihilation     0.7554,   after     0.7500
Convergence failure -- run terminated.
Error termination via Lnk1e in 
/afs/ir.stanford.edu/class/chemeng444a/programs/gaussian/sun4x_58/g98/l502.exe.
Job cpu time:  0 days  0 hours 27 minutes 37.1 seconds.

Here is my input file.
#gfinput iop(6/7=3)
# b3lyp/gen opt(modredundant,maxcycle=200) Pseudo=Read

Title Card Required

0  2
Au
Au                 1        2.884000
Au                 1        2.884331    2       60.003801
S                  3        2.108711    1       46.856789    2       
57.247633

1 B
2 B
3 B
* F

Au 0
LANL2DZ
****
4 0
6-31g(d)
****

Au 0
LANL2DZ


_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Apr 26 11:06:56 2002
Received: from ned1.sims.nrc.ca ([132.246.108.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3QF6uA05047
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:06:56 -0400
Received: from localhost (ps@localhost)
	by ned1.sims.nrc.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA18407;
	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:06:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:06:38 -0400
From: Serguei Patchkovskii <ps@ned1.sims.nrc.ca>
Reply-To: Serguei.Patchkovskii@nrc.ca
To: uccajgo7@netscape.net
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:DeMon NMR
In-Reply-To: <1A661AF6.05B85BDF.00A8F98F@netscape.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0204261056360.17432-100000@ned1.sims.nrc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Jorge,

You should send deMon support questions to deMon technical contact
at deMonkey@deMon-software.com (pronounced "deMon-key", and NOT 
"de Monkey" ;-)). You can also try sending deMon-related questions 
to the deMon users mailing list, at deMon-users@deMon-software.com.

In order to be able to help you, I will need to see the complete 
input and output files, as well as the operating system and compiler 
versions. 

Sincerely yours,

Serguei

On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 uccajgo7@netscape.net wrote:

> I am running a DeMonNMR calculation to predict the 3JHC in a compound with a
> sulfur atom with a positive charge.Can someone suggest me an
> Orbital/Auxiliary basis set for that? I am trying the iii_iglo and ii3_iglo
> and I am having travels. 
> Thanks
> Jorge

---
Dr. Serguei Patchkovskii

Tel: +1-(613)-991-2719
Fax: +1-(613)-947-2838
E-mail: Serguei.Patchkovskii@nrc.ca

Research Council Officer
Theory and Computation Group
Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
National Research Council Canada
Room 2158, 100 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0R6 Canada




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Apr 26 03:33:27 2002
Received: from web14913.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.225.240])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id g3Q7XQA29355
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 03:33:27 -0400
Message-ID: <20020426073316.51271.qmail@web14913.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [161.142.10.27] by web14913.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:33:16 PDT
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ng Pei Ling <ngpeiling1@yahoo.com>
Subject: .dlg file in autodock
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-518000143-1019806396=:50528"

--0-518000143-1019806396=:50528
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2038914912-1019806396=:50528"

--0-2038914912-1019806396=:50528
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


To my friends : 

   For the attached file : 

  1.  Is the mean dock energy too high for enzyme 2hck dock with quercetin(ligand) ? The lowest dock energy is -6.77.

  2. What is the mean of 32 for the number of cluster ? It is mean there are 32 suitable conformation for docking? 

  3. What should I change in the input file to get lower docked energy? 

 

 

Thanks for yours help. 



Miss Ng Pei Ling
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,

University Sciences Malaysia,

Minden 11800, Penang, Malaysia.

Tel:604-6577888 
Fax:604-6570017



---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
--0-2038914912-1019806396=:50528
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<P>To my friends : </P>
<P>&nbsp;&nbsp; For the attached file : </P>
<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;1.  Is the mean dock energy too high for enzyme 2hck dock with quercetin(ligand) ? The lowest dock energy is -6.77.</P>
<P>&nbsp; 2. What is the mean of 32 for the number of cluster ? It is mean there are 32 suitable conformation for docking? </P>
<P>&nbsp; 3. What should I change&nbsp;in the input file to get lower docked energy? </P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Thanks for yours help. </P><BR><BR><P><FONT face="Times New Roman">Miss Ng Pei Ling<BR>School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Times New Roman">University Sciences Malaysia,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Times New Roman">Minden 11800, </FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman">Penang, </FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman">Malaysia.<BR><BR>Tel:604-6577888 <BR>Fax:604-6570017</FONT></P><p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://games.yahoo.com">Yahoo! Games</a> - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
--0-2038914912-1019806396=:50528--
--0-518000143-1019806396=:50528
Content-Type: text/plain; name=Clustering_Histogram
Content-Description: Clustering_Histogram
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=Clustering_Histogram

CLUSTERING HISTOGRAM 2HCK 
(Using UNIX Command Grep -i 'atom' 2hck1.pdbq > 2hck2.pdbq followed by 
 Grep -v 'REMARK' 2hck2.pdbq > 2hck3.pdbq)
	         

________________________________________________________________________________
     |           |     |           |     |                                    
Clus | Lowest    | Run | Mean      | Num | Histogram                          
-ter | Docked    |     | Docked    | in  |                                    
Rank | Energy    |     | Energy    | Clus|    5    10   15   20   25   30   35
_____|___________|_____|___________|_____|____:____|____:____|____:____|____:___
   1 |     -6.88 |  32 |     -6.77 |   2 |##
   2 |     -6.48 |  34 |     -6.48 |   1 |#
   3 |     -5.97 |  99 |     -5.55 |  32 |################################
   4 |     -5.76 |  21 |     -5.76 |   1 |#
   5 |     -5.61 |  68 |     -5.61 |   1 |#
   6 |     -5.25 |   6 |     -5.25 |   1 |#
   7 |     -4.87 |  77 |     -4.80 |   2 |##
   8 |     -4.74 |  42 |     -4.73 |   2 |##
   9 |     -4.70 |  46 |     -4.70 |   1 |#
  10 |     -4.70 |  85 |     -4.70 |   1 |#
  11 |     -4.70 |  35 |     -4.55 |   4 |####
  12 |     -4.69 |  53 |     -4.69 |   1 |#
  13 |     -4.68 |  75 |     -4.68 |   1 |#
  14 |     -4.65 |  84 |     -4.65 |   1 |#
  15 |     -4.61 |   2 |     -4.61 |   1 |#
  16 |     -4.58 |  27 |     -4.49 |   6 |######
  17 |     -4.52 |  91 |     -4.47 |   2 |##
  18 |     -4.50 |  20 |     -4.50 |   2 |##
  19 |     -4.47 |  86 |     -4.46 |   2 |##
  20 |     -4.47 |  88 |     -4.47 |   1 |#
  21 |     -4.43 |  96 |     -4.37 |   5 |#####
  22 |     -4.42 |  36 |     -4.42 |   1 |#
  23 |     -4.42 |   1 |     -4.42 |   1 |#
  24 |     -4.39 |  10 |     -4.35 |   2 |##
  25 |     -4.38 |  57 |     -4.37 |   2 |##
  26 |     -4.36 |  38 |     -4.36 |   1 |#
  27 |     -4.35 |  56 |     -4.35 |   1 |#
  28 |     -4.32 |  47 |     -4.32 |   1 |#
  29 |     -4.30 |  79 |     -4.30 |   1 |#
  30 |     -4.27 |  14 |     -4.25 |   2 |##
  31 |     -4.27 |  64 |     -4.24 |   2 |##
  32 |     -4.23 |  18 |     -4.23 |   1 |#
  33 |     -4.19 |   8 |     -4.15 |   2 |##
  34 |     -4.18 |  61 |     -4.18 |   1 |#
  35 |     -4.16 |   9 |     -4.16 |   1 |#
  36 |     -4.16 |  58 |     -4.16 |   1 |#
  37 |     -4.15 |  70 |     -4.15 |   2 |##
  38 |     -4.14 |  65 |     -4.14 |   1 |#
  39 |     -4.09 |  19 |     -4.09 |   1 |#
  40 |     -3.96 |  82 |     -3.96 |   1 |#
  41 |     -3.90 | 100 |     -3.90 |   1 |#
  42 |     -3.85 |  28 |     -3.85 |   1 |#
  43 |     -3.77 |  63 |     -3.77 |   1 |#
  44 |     -3.72 |   4 |     -3.72 |   1 |#
  45 |     -2.04 |  87 |     -2.04 |   1 |#
_____|___________|_____|___________|_____|______________________________________



RMSD TABLE 2HCK

_____________________________________________________________________
     |      |      |           |         |                 |
Rank | Sub- | Run  | Docked    | Cluster | Reference       | Grep
     | Rank |      | Energy    | RMSD    | RMSD            | Pattern
_____|______|______|___________|_________|_________________|___________
   1      1     32       -6.88      0.00    137.36           RANKING
   1      2     29       -6.66      0.29    137.47           RANKING
   2      1     34       -6.48      0.00    137.57           RANKING
   3      1     99       -5.97      0.00    133.23           RANKING
   3      2     43       -5.97      0.05    133.21           RANKING
   3      3     31       -5.94      0.04    133.23           RANKING
   3      4     74       -5.90      0.09    133.20           RANKING
   3      5     52       -5.87      0.14    133.21           RANKING
   3      6     25       -5.87      0.18    133.19           RANKING
   3      7     30       -5.86      0.08    133.24           RANKING
   3      8     33       -5.85      0.13    133.19           RANKING
   3      9     78       -5.78      0.23    133.29           RANKING
   3     10     90       -5.76      0.21    133.29           RANKING
   3     11     92       -5.76      0.24    133.20           RANKING
   3     12     94       -5.70      0.18    133.25           RANKING
   3     13     16       -5.69      0.26    133.27           RANKING
   3     14     37       -5.66      0.29    133.20           RANKING
   3     15     67       -5.65      0.27    133.21           RANKING
   3     16     72       -5.64      0.32    133.34           RANKING
   3     17     98       -5.64      0.31    133.28           RANKING
   3     18     60       -5.60      0.35    133.35           RANKING
   3     19     69       -5.57      0.37    133.31           RANKING
   3     20     24       -5.56      0.33    133.35           RANKING
   3     21     54       -5.51      0.32    133.34           RANKING
   3     22     89       -5.43      0.33    133.31           RANKING
   3     23     83       -5.43      0.35    133.26           RANKING
   3     24     51       -5.39      0.39    133.30           RANKING
   3     25      5       -5.30      0.41    133.25           RANKING
   3     26     97       -5.24      0.28    133.14           RANKING
   3     27     15       -5.20      0.43    133.09           RANKING
   3     28     81       -5.16      0.50    133.30           RANKING
   3     29     62       -5.02      0.47    133.19           RANKING
   3     30     59       -4.99      0.45    133.08           RANKING
   3     31     66       -4.93      0.41    133.09           RANKING
   3     32     17       -4.87      0.47    133.08           RANKING
   4      1     21       -5.76      0.00    137.59           RANKING
   5      1     68       -5.61      0.00    133.86           RANKING
   6      1      6       -5.25      0.00    133.85           RANKING
   7      1     77       -4.87      0.00    132.82           RANKING
   7      2     50       -4.74      0.45    132.61           RANKING
   8      1     42       -4.74      0.00    131.30           RANKING
   8      2     80       -4.71      0.38    131.35           RANKING
   9      1     46       -4.70      0.00    133.09           RANKING
  10      1     85       -4.70      0.00    132.66           RANKING
  11      1     35       -4.70      0.00    133.31           RANKING
  11      2     11       -4.60      0.47    133.32           RANKING
  11      3      7       -4.56      0.49    133.32           RANKING
  11      4     39       -4.35      0.37    133.24           RANKING
  12      1     53       -4.69      0.00    131.72           RANKING
  13      1     75       -4.68      0.00    132.39           RANKING
  14      1     84       -4.65      0.00    131.85           RANKING
  15      1      2       -4.61      0.00    132.77           RANKING
  16      1     27       -4.58      0.00    130.90           RANKING
  16      2     73       -4.57      0.20    130.84           RANKING
  16      3     13       -4.56      0.44    131.08           RANKING
  16      4     40       -4.50      0.10    130.92           RANKING
  16      5     76       -4.39      0.26    130.81           RANKING
  16      6     12       -4.36      0.32    130.83           RANKING
  17      1     91       -4.52      0.00    132.58           RANKING
  17      2     23       -4.43      0.21    132.45           RANKING
  18      1     20       -4.50      0.00    138.07           RANKING
  18      2     55       -4.49      0.30    138.25           RANKING
  19      1     86       -4.47      0.00    133.21           RANKING
  19      2     26       -4.45      0.12    133.20           RANKING
  20      1     88       -4.47      0.00    133.23           RANKING
  21      1     96       -4.43      0.00    133.56           RANKING
  21      2     71       -4.40      0.22    133.47           RANKING
  21      3     22       -4.36      0.26    133.37           RANKING
  21      4     95       -4.34      0.46    133.35           RANKING
  21      5      3       -4.32      0.38    133.58           RANKING
  22      1     36       -4.42      0.00    133.12           RANKING
  23      1      1       -4.42      0.00    132.32           RANKING
  24      1     10       -4.39      0.00    133.64           RANKING
  24      2     44       -4.31      0.40    133.59           RANKING
  25      1     57       -4.38      0.00    133.42           RANKING
  25      2     48       -4.37      0.05    133.40           RANKING
  26      1     38       -4.36      0.00    132.77           RANKING
  27      1     56       -4.35      0.00    132.24           RANKING
  28      1     47       -4.32      0.00    132.80           RANKING
  29      1     79       -4.30      0.00    131.29           RANKING
  30      1     14       -4.27      0.00    132.53           RANKING
  30      2     93       -4.22      0.21    132.65           RANKING
  31      1     64       -4.27      0.00    133.37           RANKING
  31      2     45       -4.22      0.48    133.34           RANKING
  32      1     18       -4.23      0.00    137.02           RANKING
  33      1      8       -4.19      0.00    133.63           RANKING
  33      2     41       -4.10      0.44    133.79           RANKING
  34      1     61       -4.18      0.00    138.00           RANKING
  35      1      9       -4.16      0.00    133.01           RANKING
  36      1     58       -4.16      0.00    138.52           RANKING
  37      1     70       -4.15      0.00    132.55           RANKING
  37      2     49       -4.15      0.18    132.48           RANKING
  38      1     65       -4.14      0.00    133.38           RANKING
  39      1     19       -4.09      0.00    134.06           RANKING
  40      1     82       -3.96      0.00    130.54           RANKING
  41      1    100       -3.90      0.00    133.71           RANKING
  42      1     28       -3.85      0.00    133.29           RANKING
  43      1     63       -3.77      0.00    131.15           RANKING
  44      1      4       -3.72      0.00    131.54           RANKING
  45      1     87       -2.04      0.00    133.17           RANKING
_______________________________________________________________________


--0-518000143-1019806396=:50528--


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Apr 26 05:13:04 2002
Received: from igc.phys.chem.ethz.ch ([129.132.218.130])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3Q9D3A30826
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 05:13:04 -0400
Received: from humagne.ethz.ch (humagne [129.132.218.162])
	by igc.phys.chem.ethz.ch (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g3Q9Crx07694
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:12:53 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from portmann@localhost)
	by humagne.ethz.ch (8.11.4/8.11.4) id g3Q9CrX09483
	for chemistry@ccl.net; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:12:53 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:12:53 +0200 (MEST)
Message-Id: <200204260912.g3Q9CrX09483@humagne.ethz.ch>
From: Stefan Portmann <info@watoc02.ch>
Reply-To: info@watoc02.ch
Subject: WATOC'02: Early Bird Discount!
Content-Type: text

Dear Madam or Sir

6th WORLD CONGRESS OF THEORETICALLY ORIENTED CHEMISTS (WATOC'02)
August 4-9, 2002, Palazzo dei Congressi, Lugano, Switzerland

Theory, Computation and Information Science in Chemistry,
Biochemistry and Materials Science

Don't miss the opportunity to get the early bird discount
(Deadline: April 30 2002) and register immediately at
http://www.watoc02.ch

Please also have a look at the information regarding local
expenses in the section "Budgetary Considerations".
We offer low cost housing possibilities, check it out!

A first detailed program is also available.

Abstracts for poster presentations can still be submitted.
In order to give the poster sessions optimal visibility,
an award program was established. The posters will be
rated both on popular and on jury votes. There will be a
two hour award ceremony on Thursday evening. The poster
sessions will be endowed by Gaussian, Inc..

We are looking forward to see you in Lugano.

Hans Peter Luethi and Stefan Portmann
ETH Zurich





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Apr 26 11:17:07 2002
Received: from euch4e.chem.emory.edu ([170.140.59.12])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3QFH7A05627
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:17:07 -0400
Received: from localhost (guishan@localhost)
	by euch4e.chem.emory.edu (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA38292
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:16:50 -0400
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:16:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Guishan Zheng <guishan@euch4e.chem.emory.edu>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: How to "loose" molecular symmetry in MOPAC2002
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.32.0204261111350.36842-100000@euch4e.chem.emory.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hello, all

I am running a optimization job of C240 using MOPAC2002. The output file
shows that this molecule is of symmetry C1, how can I run it at a higher
symmetry, like Ih. When I did the same job with Gaussian, I can add
the keyword "symm=loose", but how  can I do with MOPAC? Any help are
greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Have a nice day.

Guishan Zheng


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Apr 26 12:13:56 2002
Received: from postal.ucc.uno.edu ([137.30.1.80])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3QGDoA07034
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:13:52 -0400
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by postal.ucc.uno.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #38784)
 id <0GV600401NODPM@postal.ucc.uno.edu> for chemistry@ccl.net; Fri,
 26 Apr 2002 11:13:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from uno.edu (acad-2-1-066.dhcp.uno.edu [137.30.117.66])
 by postal.ucc.uno.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #38784)
 with ESMTP id <0GV6005BPNNRXB@postal.ucc.uno.edu> for chemistry@ccl.net; Fri,
 26 Apr 2002 11:11:51 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:05:17 -0500
From: "Monica C. Concha" <mconcha@uno.edu>
Subject: Help
To: "chemistry@ccl.net" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Message-id: <3CC97ABA.52265D57@uno.edu>
Organization: University of New Orleans
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
Content-type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="Boundary_(ID_geIL7cYCYOyKwD7FcrVKwQ)"
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_geIL7cYCYOyKwD7FcrVKwQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-mac-type=54455854;
 x-mac-creator=4D4F5353
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT

Dear CCLers,

I was trying to run a job using cbs-qb3 (gaussian 98 A.7) and it crashed
at the very last steps  of cbsextrap  due to lack of space. When I try
to restart it with the opt(restart) option it is able to read in info
> from the checkpoint file but it crashed in L401 Iop(5). Is there some
way to get around this problem without having to repeat the entire
calculation.  The Gaussian manual says that cbs jobs are restartable but
noone in my group has been able to do this. Any suggestions?

Thanks

Mónica

--
Monica C. Concha
Research Associate
Dept. Of Chemistry
University of New Orleans
New Orleans LA 70148
E-mail mconcha@uno.edu

--Boundary_(ID_geIL7cYCYOyKwD7FcrVKwQ)
Content-type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name=mconcha.vcf
Content-description: Card for Monica C. Concha
Content-disposition: attachment; filename=mconcha.vcf
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

begin:vcard 
n:Concha;Monica C. 
tel;fax:504-280-6860
tel;home:504- 456-2325
tel;work:504-280-7216
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:University of New Orleans;Chemistry
adr:;;Lakeshore;New Orleans;LA;70148;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:mconcha@uno.edu
title:Research Associate
x-mozilla-cpt:;1
fn:Monica C. Concha
end:vcard

--Boundary_(ID_geIL7cYCYOyKwD7FcrVKwQ)--


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Apr 26 12:28:50 2002
Received: from gandalf.cber.nih.gov ([128.231.52.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3QGSoA07480
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:28:50 -0400
Received: from localhost (rvenable@localhost) by gandalf.cber.nih.gov (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id MAA72793; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:21:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:21:56 -0400
From: Rick Venable <rvenable@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
To: "J. Zheng" <jzheng73@u.washington.edu>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net, Goran Widmalm <gw@organ.su.se>
Subject: Re: CCL:ask for workshop of charmm or linux cluster.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.44.0204241248340.98282-100000@dante19.u.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0204261141170.72601-100000@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, J. Zheng wrote:
> hi, my question is a little bit out of subject of this forum. Now, I
> am working on how to write a script by using CHARMM software
> package. It really takes me lots of time to learn how to use it. I
> am wondering that if there is any workshop for teaching how to use
> CHARMM. I think it would be much better for me in order to save the
> time and learn more stuff from CHARMM.

CHARMM related mailing lists:

	charmm-bbs@csir.org

To subscribe, send email to sympa@csir.org with the text 

subscribe charmm-bbs

in the message body; sympa is an automated list manager.

	charmm-users@tammy.harvard.edu

To subscribe, send email to chmgr@tammy.harvard.edu and indicate that
you wish to receive 'charmm-users' messages; not automated.


CHARMM related web sites:

	HTML versions of .doc files:

www.lobos.nih.gov/Charmm
www.scripps.edu/brooks/charmm_docs/charmm.html	

	Tutorial:

www.psc.edu/general/software/packages/charmm/charmm.html



=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Rick Venable           29/500
FDA/CBER/OVRR Biophysics Lab
1401 Rockville Pike    HFM-419
Rockville, MD  20852-1448  U.S.A.
(301) 496-1905   Rick_Venable@nih.gov
ALT email:  rvenable@speakeasy.org
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=






From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Apr 26 15:37:40 2002
Received: from smtp.unc.edu ([152.2.1.241])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3QJbZA10729
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:37:39 -0400
Received: from bock.chem.unc.edu.smtp.unc.edu (bock.chem.unc.edu [152.2.48.182])
	by smtp.unc.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3QJatQ1006114;
	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:36:55 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: jochen@bock.chem.unc.edu
To: molpro-user <molpro-user@stchem.bham.ac.uk>
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: molpro-parser
User-Agent: XEmacs/Gnus
X-Attribution: Jochen
X-Face: -%Z4EZ6iY'4m:wiK:!v<f*n1TeWpDxL;vm\2]@7KGXgHzB#JSK#;`z4tYg#7ck/]wrqw6:}
 ;vcVMJ0N~%+;N&e,%5phkzeP![#CQ^y^]lyS0Wvp"sV(0$dvw}(12VU<:|q~@MX]S=o46H!(2*%?'k
 Wz-%ul~-hoJL$/SQzy&^?aLj"u9)Lk0zvwmg|#\@U{j:5?C-*{<3que:_Vb@Ly
X-URL: http://www.jochen-kuepper.de
From: "Jochen =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCpper?=" <jochen@unc.edu>
Organization: University of North Carolina
Date: 26 Apr 2002 15:36:55 -0400
Message-ID: <lyznzq1cbs.fsf@bock.chem.unc.edu>
Lines: 22
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I got tired of retyping my grep-regexps and struggling with multiline
matches again and again, so I wrote a small python script
'molpro-parser' to extract information from molpro output files.
Currently it supports extracting energies, rotational constants, and
variable sections of geometry optimizations.  It can operate on
multiple files at once and can be used as a stdin--stdout filter.

The script is available at 
,----
| http://python.jochen-kuepper.de/jkext
`----

Feel free to send comments, suggestions, patches, or simply snippets
of output files you would like the script to extract.

Greetings,
Jochen
-- 
University of North Carolina                       phone: +1-919-962-4403
Department of Chemistry                            phone: +1-919-962-1579
Venable Hall CB#3290 (Kenan C148)                    fax: +1-919-843-6041
Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA                            GnuPG key: 44BCCD8E



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Apr 26 15:52:04 2002
Received: from aspx-smtp.netaspx.com ([137.66.136.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3QJq3A10943
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:52:03 -0400
Received: from aspx-mail.netaspx.com ([137.66.136.3])
          by aspx-smtp.netaspx.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.9)
          with SMTP id 2002042614514624:116084 ;
          Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:51:46 -0500 
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Locating a transition state
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4a  July 24, 2000
From: Genzo.Tanaka@netaspx.com
Message-ID: <OFB63A3986.BB160695-ON85256BA7.0069F1EF@netaspx.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:51:46 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ASPX-Mail/netASPx(Release 5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at
 04/26/2002 02:51:48 PM,
	Serialize complete at 04/26/2002 02:51:48 PM,
	Itemize by SMTP Server on ASPX-SMTP/netASPx(Release 5.0.9 |November 16, 2001) at
 04/26/2002 02:51:46 PM,
	Serialize by Router on ASPX-SMTP/netASPx(Release 5.0.9 |November 16, 2001) at
 04/26/2002 02:51:55 PM,
	Serialize complete at 04/26/2002 02:51:55 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 006D1DB085256BA7_="

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 006D1DB085256BA7_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,

I am trying to locate a transition state for a system about 30 atoms using 
an empirical
method. So far I haven't had any success. I would appreciate if you could
give me any suggestions. 

I am interested in a hydrolysis reaction pathway, using PM3 in Gaussian 
98:

R-C-O-C-R' + H*-O'H ---> R-C-O-H*  + H-O'-C-R'

I have done the following: 
1) opt=Ts ; This always failed due to incorrect number of negative
frequencies. 
2) Scan  ; I have not tried much. 
3) opt=ModRedundant: Scanning succeeded, but the population analysis after
the scanning seemed failed. The output did not indicate why it failed, but
the heading of population analysis appeared, followed by signal 11 error. 
4) opt=qst2; There is (are) one or two statement(s) "stationary point was
found" (the distances were the same for all, but the angles and torsions 
were slightly different in the two stationary points) in the output, but 
the optimization (?) kept going and failed; Optimization aborted
--- No acceptable step or Inconsistency: ModMin=   2. 

I optimized two reactant molecules individually and moved them close to 
make
a reaction. The products were also optimized. The order of the atoms are
exactly the same. 


Thanks, 

Genzo Tanaka 
Network Computing Services, Inc./ 
Army High Performance Computing Research Center at FAMU
 
--=_alternative 006D1DB085256BA7_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"


<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Hi,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">I am trying to locate a transition state for a system about 30 atoms using an empirical<br>
method. So far I haven't had any success. I would appreciate if you could<br>
give me any suggestions. <br>
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">I am interested in a hydrolysis reaction pathway, using PM3 in Gaussian 98:</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">R-C-O-C-R' + H*-O'H ---&gt; R-C-O-H* &nbsp;+ H-O'-C-R'</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">I have done the following: <br>
1) opt=Ts ; This always failed due to incorrect number of negative<br>
frequencies. <br>
2) Scan &nbsp;; I have not tried much. <br>
3) opt=ModRedundant: Scanning succeeded, but the population analysis after<br>
the scanning seemed failed. The output did not indicate why it failed, but<br>
the heading of population analysis appeared, followed by signal 11 error. <br>
4) opt=qst2; There is (are) one or two statement(s) &quot;stationary point was<br>
found&quot; (the distances were the same for all, but the angles and torsions were slightly different in the two stationary points) in the output, but the optimization (?) kept going and failed; Optimization aborted<br>
--- No acceptable step or Inconsistency: ModMin= &nbsp; 2. <br>
<br>
I optimized two reactant molecules individually and moved them close to make<br>
a reaction. The products were also optimized. The order of the atoms are<br>
exactly the same. <br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks, <br>
<br>
Genzo Tanaka <br>
Network Computing Services, Inc./ <br>
Army High Performance Computing Research Center at FAMU</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">&nbsp;</font>
--=_alternative 006D1DB085256BA7_=--


