From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Mon Jul 29 05:23:42 2002
Received: from web12801.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.36])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id g6T9Nff23174
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 05:23:41 -0400
Message-ID: <20020729092341.90980.qmail@web12801.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [61.9.73.249] by web12801.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:23:41 PDT
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: amor san juan <a_juanphd@yahoo.com>
Subject: Hint geometry optimization
To: chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hello all;

This had been a problem to me many months. Hope
somebody patient enough to point out what molecular
package can give cartesian coordinates for benzamidine
as follows:

ATOM1  C1  BEN     1   -1.853  14.311  16.658  ben  C
ATOM2  C2  BEN     1   -2.107  15.653  16.758  ben  C
ATOM3  H2  BEN     1   -2.573  16.191  15.916  ben  H
ATOM4  C3  BEN     1   -1.774  16.341  17.932  ben  C
ATOM5  H3  BEN     1   -1.983  17.421  18.014  ben  H
ATOM6  C4  BEN     1   -1.175  15.662  19.005  ben  C
ATOM7  H4  BEN     1   -0.914  16.201  19.931  ben  H
ATOM8  C5  BEN     1   -0.914  14.295  18.885  ben  C
ATOM9  H5  BEN     1   -0.441  13.744  19.715  ben  H
ATOM10 C6  BEN     1   -1.257  13.634  17.708  ben  C
ATOM11 H6  BEN     1   -1.051  12.555  17.611  ben  H
ATOM12 C7  BEN     1   -2.193  13.627  15.496  ben  C
ATOM13 N1  BEN     1   -2.797  14.235  14.491  ben  N
ATOM14 N2  BEN     1   -1.762  12.391  15.309  ben  N
ATOM15 H11 BEN     1   -3.039  13.707  13.640  ben  H
ATOM16 H12 BEN     1   -3.026  15.237  14.558  ben  H
ATOM17 H21 BEN     1   -1.287  11.890  16.073  ben  H
ATOM18 H22 BEN     1   -1.901  11.929  14.399  ben  H 

I tried 2 different commercial molecular modeling
package both have MM & semiempirical yet, I cant find
result of conformation as above. Based from what I did
these 2 commercial packages generated small cartesian
coordinates.

Would someone please show where is the
problem.....advice some reading journals.....or even
give any ideas.

Sincerely,
Amor

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Mon Jul 29 08:14:49 2002
Received: from web20207.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.62])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id g6TCEnf25927
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 08:14:49 -0400
Message-ID: <20020729121449.31164.qmail@web20207.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [130.83.244.130] by web20207.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 05:14:49 PDT
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 05:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hatice Can <alphacan2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: MD with SYBYL
To: chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dear All,

I try to do MD simulation with Sybyl 6.8.
The system which will be simulated consists of an
organic compound placed
inside the zeolite supercage. I want to get conformers
of organic
compound when it is located inside the supercage of
zeolite. I built the
supercage and then I put the organic compound inside
supercage. When I
tried to built that system, I put the two molecules
into two different
areas, such as m1 and m2.For example, the organic
compound is in m1 area
and zeolite supercage is in m2 area.
 I am not quite sure that if the md simulation
consider the molecule in m1 area, can program take
into account of the
forces can affect from which zeolite supercage to
compound in area m1.

If you would like to sent to me any advice or
suggestions, I will be glad.

Thank you in advance,

Kind regards,

Hatice


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 01:04:59 2002
Received: from carbon.chem.ucla.edu ([128.97.35.55])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g6U54xf22472
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:04:59 -0400
Received: from [128.97.147.202] (ch-02.psnet.ucla.edu [128.97.147.202])
	by carbon.chem.ucla.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g6U54PY11332;
	Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p04320402b96bcdd0d475@[128.97.147.202]>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:04:04 -0700
To: HOPOS-L@listserv.nd.edu
From: Eric Scerri <scerri@chem.ucla.edu>
Subject: Philosophy of Chemistry Meeting in D.C.
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1184117033==_ma============"

--============_-1184117033==_ma============
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

International Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry (ISPC)
Georgetown University, Washington, DC.            August 5 - 8, 2002 

Plenary Sessions (Room 103 Healy Hall )
"Philosophy of Chemistry: From Infancy Towards Maturity,"J. Schummer, 
Univ. of Karlsruhe, Germany
"Chemistry and the Structural Pattern of Explanation," R. Harr=E9, 
Georgetown University
"The Issue of Reduction," J, van Brakel, K. U., Leuven, Belgium.
"Mechanisms vs. Pathways in Biochemistry," L. Darden, Univ. of Maryland
"Philosophical Confusion in Chemical Education Research," E. Scerri, UCLA
"National Science Foundation Programs Related to Philosophy of 
Chemistry," A. Ellis,  B Seely, NSF
"Science and Art: Two Ways of Seeing," B. Berrie, National Gallery of 
Art, (West Bldg. Lecture Hall, NGA)

Concurrent Sessions (103,104,105 Healy Hall)
Philosophical Problems in Chemical Explanation
"The Physicists, the Chemists and the Pragmatics of Explanation," R. 
=46. Hendry, The U. of Durham, UK
"Natural Kinds, Explanation, and Essentialism in Chemistry," R. 
Vihalemm, The U. of Tartu, Estonia
"A Sketch of Macroscopic Ontology," P. Needham, The U. of Stockholm, Sweden.
"Sums or Products? Objects or States?" G. K. Vemulapalli, The Univ. 
of Arizona, AZ.
"Can 'Things' Be Made Up of 'Features' or 'Properties'?" J. Earley, 
Georgetown Univ.

  Chemical Explanation Exemplified
"Semi-empirical Models of Protein Folding: Construction and 
Evaluation in Theory Construction," J. Ramsey, Smith College
"Chirality and Handedness: the Ruch 'Shoe-Potato' Dichotomy in 
Right-Left Classifications," R. B, King, Univ. of Ga.
"Electronegativity and Base Strength," H. Raubenheimer, G. 
Heydenrych, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
"Explanation in Organic Chemistry," W. Goodwin, Univiversity of 
California, Berkeley
"Explaining Instrumental Techniques of Analytical Chemistry," D. 
Rothbart, George Mason University

Representation, Visualization and Chemical Explanation
"Beyond the Dimensionality of Visualization in Chemistry," A. 
Burewicz, N. Miranowicz, A. Mickiewicz U., Poland.
"Molecular Aesthetics: From the Empirical to the Constitutive," T. 
Spector, The University of San Francisco
"Writing As Thinking," J. Kovac, The University of Tennessee
"A Mathematical Proposal for Linking the Natural Sciences," J. 
Chandler, Krasnow Institute, George Mason Univ.
"Paradoxes of Measurement," P. Heelan, Georgetown University

History and Chemical Explanation
"Philosophy of Science and History3 of Science,"  F. M. Akeroyd, 
Bradford College, UK."
"Richard Rufus' Theory of Mixture," M. Weisberg, Stanford University, CA.
"Mendeleev's Discovery of the Periodic Law: the Origin and the 
Reception," M. Kaji, Tokyo Inst. of  Technology,
"Changing Identities and Shifting Domains: Development of NMR 
Spectroscopy 1956-1969", J. Roberts, VPI&SU.

Chemical Explanation and Ultimate Concerns 
"Chemical Explanations, Metaphysical Realism and Tacit Knowledge," W. 
Brandt, Univ. of Wisc., Milwaukee.
"Mind, Fitness, and Ambiguity: Chemical Emergences,"  R. Khuri, Falls 
Church, VA.
"Chemical Explanations in Science and Spirituality,"  K. Hojo, Chiba, Japan.
"Creation as a Principle in Chemistry," H. Vancik, The University of 
Zagreb, Croatia.
" 'Complexification' and Self-Organization in a Process  Philosophy 
of Union,"  J. Salmon, Loyola College.
An Ethical Issue for Contemporary Chemistry," E. Klingsberg, Washington, DC

Explanation and Chemical Physics
"Physical Explanation of the Periodic Table," V. Ostrovsky, The 
University of St. Petersburg, Russia
"Modal Domains and Quantal Protectorates,"  G.  Farre, Georgetown University
"Is the First Law Harmful?" G. Job, T. Lankau, The University of 
Hamburg, Germany
"A Qualitative Account of the Chemical Bond in Terms of the Laws of 
Physics,"  S. Vollmer, H. Kincaid, U. Ala, Birmingham.
"Is Chemistry a Gauge Theory?" J. Mattingly, Georgetown University

Schedule at http://www.georgetown.edu/earleyj/ISPC.html   Contact: 
Earleyj@ georgetown.
-- 


Dr. Eric Scerri ,
UCLA,
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry,
607 Charles E. Young Drive East,
Los Angeles,  CA 90095-1569
USA

E-mail :   scerri@chem.ucla.edu
tel:  310 206 7443
fax:  310 206 2061
Web Page:    http://www.chem.ucla.edu/dept/Faculty/scerri/index.html

Editor  of  Foundations of Chemistry
http://www.kluweronline.com/issn/1386-4238

Also see International Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry
http://www.georgetown.edu/earleyj/ISPC.html
--============_-1184117033==_ma============
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type=3D"text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { margin-top: 0 ; margin-bottom: 0 }
 --></style><title>Philosophy of Chemistry Meeting in
D.C.</title></head><body>
<div><font face=3D"Geneva" size=3D"+3" color=3D"#000000"><b>International
Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry (ISPC)<br>
</b></font><font face=3D"Geneva" size=3D"+1"
color=3D"#000000"><i>Georgetown University, Washington,
DC.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span
></span>&nbsp;</i> August 5 - 8, 2002&nbsp;</font><br>
<font face=3D"Geneva" size=3D"+1" color=3D"#000000"></font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Geneva" size=3D"+1" color=3D"#000000"><b>Plenary
Sessions (Room 103 Healy Hall )<br>
</b>&quot;Philosophy of Chemistry: From Infancy Towards
Maturity,&quot;<u>J. Schummer</u>, Univ. of Karlsruhe, Germany<br>
&quot;Chemistry and the Structural Pattern of Explanation,&quot;<u>
R. Harr=E9</u>, Georgetown University<br>
&quot;The Issue of Reduction,&quot;<u> J, van Brakel,</u> K. U.,
Leuven, Belgium.<br>
&quot;Mechanisms vs. Pathways in Biochemistry,&quot;<u> L.
Darden</u>, Univ. of Maryland<br>
&quot;Philosophical Confusion in Chemical Education
Research,&quot;<u> E. Scerri</u>, UCLA<br>
&quot;National Science Foundation Programs Related to Philosophy of
Chemistry,&quot;<u> A. Ellis,</u>&nbsp;<u> B Seely</u>, NSF<br>
&quot;Science and Art: Two Ways of Seeing,&quot;<u> B. Berrie</u>,
National Gallery of Art, (West Bldg. Lecture Hall, NGA)<br>
<br>
<b>Concurrent Sessions (103,104,105 Healy Hall)<br>
</b><i>Philosophical Problems in Chemical Explanation<br>
</i>&quot;The Physicists, the Chemists and the Pragmatics of
Explanation,&quot;<u> R. F. Hendry</u>, The U. of Durham, UK<br>
&quot;Natural Kinds, Explanation, and Essentialism in
Chemistry,&quot;<u> R. Vihalemm</u>, The U. of Tartu, Estonia<br>
&quot;A Sketch of Macroscopic Ontology,&quot;<u> P. Needham</u>, The
U. of Stockholm, Sweden.<br>
&quot;Sums or Products? Objects or States?&quot;<u> G. K.
Vemulapalli</u>, The Univ. of Arizona, AZ.<br>
&quot;Can 'Things' Be Made Up of 'Features' or
'Properties'?&quot;<u> J. Earley,</u> Georgetown Univ.<br>
<br>
&nbsp;<i>Chemical Explanation Exemplified<br>
</i>&quot;Semi-empirical Models of Protein Folding: Construction and
Evaluation in Theory Construction,&quot;<u> J. Ramsey</u>, Smith
College<br>
&quot;Chirality and Handedness: the Ruch 'Shoe-Potato' Dichotomy
in&nbsp; Right-Left Classifications,&quot;<u> R. B, King</u>, Univ.
of Ga.<br>
&quot;Electronegativity and Base Strength,&quot; H. Raubenheimer,<u>
G. Heydenrych</u>, Stellenbosch University, South Africa<br>
&quot;Explanation in Organic Chemistry,&quot;<u> W. Goodwin</u>,
Univiversity of California, Berkeley<br>
&quot;Explaining Instrumental Techniques of Analytical
Chemistry,&quot;<u> D. Rothbart</u>, George Mason University<br>
<br>
<i>Representation, Visualization and Chemical Explanation<br>
</i>&quot;Beyond the Dimensionality of Visualization in
Chemistry,&quot; A. Burewicz,<u> N. Miranowicz</u>, A. Mickiewicz U.,
Poland.<br>
&quot;Molecular Aesthetics: From the Empirical to the
Constitutive,&quot;<u> T. Spector</u>, The University of San
=46rancisco<br>
&quot;Writing As Thinking,&quot;<u> J. Kovac</u>, The University of
Tennessee<br>
&quot;A Mathematical Proposal for Linking the Natural
Sciences,&quot;<u> J. Chandler</u>, Krasnow Institute, George Mason
Univ.<br>
&quot;Paradoxes of Measurement,&quot;<u> P. Heelan</u>, Georgetown
University<br>
<br>
<i>History and Chemical Explanation<br>
</i>&quot;Philosophy of Science and History3 of
Science,&quot;&nbsp;<u> F. M. Akeroyd</u>, Bradford College,
UK.&quot;<br>
&quot;Richard Rufus' Theory of Mixture,&quot;<u> M. Weisberg</u>,
Stanford University, CA.<br>
&quot;Mendeleev's Discovery of the Periodic Law: the Origin and the
Reception,&quot;<u> M. Kaji</u>, Tokyo Inst. of&nbsp; Technology,<br>
&quot;Changing Identities and Shifting Domains: Development of NMR
Spectroscopy 1956-1969&quot;,<u> J. Roberts</u>, VPI&amp;SU.<br>
<br>
<i>Chemical Explanation and Ultimate Concerns&nbsp;<br>
</i>&quot;Chemical Explanations, Metaphysical Realism and Tacit
Knowledge,&quot;<u> W. Brandt</u>, Univ. of Wisc., Milwaukee.<br>
&quot;Mind, Fitness, and Ambiguity: Chemical
Emergences,&quot;&nbsp;<u> R. Khuri</u>, Falls Church, VA.<br>
&quot;Chemical Explanations in Science and
Spirituality,&quot;&nbsp;<u> K. Hojo</u>, Chiba, Japan.<br>
&quot;Creation as a Principle in Chemistry,&quot;<u> H. Vancik</u>,
The University of Zagreb, Croatia.<br>
&quot; 'Complexification' and Self-Organization in a Process&nbsp;
Philosophy of Union,&quot;&nbsp;<u> J. Salmon</u>, Loyola College.<br>
An Ethical Issue for Contemporary Chemistry,&quot;<u> E.
Klingsberg</u>, Washington, DC<br>
<br>
<i>Explanation and Chemical Physics<br>
</i>&quot;Physical Explanation of the Periodic Table,&quot; V.
Ostrovsky, The University of St. Petersburg, Russia<br>
&quot;Modal Domains and Quantal Protectorates,&quot;&nbsp;<u>
G.&nbsp; Farre,</u> Georgetown University<br>
&quot;Is the First Law Harmful?&quot;<u> G. Job</u>, T. Lankau, The
University of Hamburg, Germany<br>
&quot;A Qualitative Account of the Chemical Bond in Terms of the Laws
of Physics,&quot;&nbsp;<u> S. Vollmer</u>, H. Kincaid, U. Ala,
Birmingham.<br>
&quot;Is Chemistry a Gauge Theory?&quot;<u> J. Mattingly</u>,
Georgetown University</font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Geneva" size=3D"-1" color=3D"#000000"><br>
</font><font face=3D"Geneva" size=3D"+2" color=3D"#000000">Schedule at
http://www.georgetown.edu/earleyj/ISPC.h<span
></span>tml&nbsp;&nbsp; Contact: Earleyj@ georgetown.</font></div>

<div><font color=3D"#000000">-- <br>
<br>
<br>
Dr. Eric Scerri ,<br>
UCLA,<br>
Department of Chemistry &amp; Biochemistry,<br>
607 Charles E. Young Drive East,<br>
Los Angeles,&nbsp; CA 90095-1569<br>
USA<br>
<br>
E-mail :&nbsp;&nbsp; scerri@chem.ucla.edu<br>
tel:&nbsp; 310 206 7443<br>
fax:&nbsp; 310 206 2061<br>
Web Page:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
http://www.chem.ucla.edu/dept/Faculty/sc<span
></span>erri/index.html<br>
<br>
Editor&nbsp; of&nbsp; Foundations of Chemistry</font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D"+2"
color=3D"#FF0000"><b>http://www.kluweronline.com/issn/1386-423<span
></span>8</b></font><font color=3D"#000000"><br>
<br>
Also see International Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry<br>
http://www.georgetown.edu/earleyj/ISPC.ht<span
></span>ml</font></div>
</body>
</html>
--============_-1184117033==_ma============--


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 08:35:15 2002
Received: from web12803.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.38])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id g6UCZFf30680
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:35:15 -0400
Message-ID: <20020730123514.58748.qmail@web12803.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [61.9.73.249] by web12803.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 05:35:14 PDT
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 05:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: amor san juan <a_juanphd@yahoo.com>
Subject: grid maps in autodock
To: chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi all;

If grid maps are specific only for ligand types then,
does ligand charge dictates the presence of grid map
values? Will this imply that relative positive charge
ligand favors successful docking in AutoDock.

Thanks for the enlightenment.

Amor 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Mon Jul 29 13:09:50 2002
Received: from so.sd.lionbioscience.com ([209.68.255.43])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g6TH9nf01187
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:09:49 -0400
Received: from tempest.sd.lionbioscience.com (tempest.sd.lionbioscience.com [10.8.0.8])
	by so.sd.lionbioscience.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g6TH9Dg18193
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by tempest.sd.lionbioscience.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <M8ZD8XGT>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:09:03 -0700
Message-ID: <F449760366ACD411B35F00508B9B0FDB01116364@tempest.sd.lionbioscience.com>
From: Matthew Lee <matthew.lee@lionbioscience.com>
To: "'chemistry@ccl.net'" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: solution to empty affinity maps by autodock's autogrid
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:09:00 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C23722.A2102CE0"

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C23722.A2102CE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

	I have found the solution to my problem with Autodock 3.0's
autogrid3.  As reported earlier, autogrid3 was creating grid map files with
all zero's (or whatever "constant" was defined to in the GPF file).

	Again, with one ligand, everything works fine, but in another ligand
that happened to be much more flexible, I was having autogrid3 problems.
The extra flexibility was unrelated to the problem.

	The problem lies in the "gridcenter" line of the GPF file.  I used
(as recommended by the manual) mkgpf3 to create the GPF file, but this
mkgpf3 script defines the center of the grid based on the ligand's
coordinates, not based on the protein's (the manual does not say it's doing
this).  Perhaps this is a feature in some instances?!?!  

	In my problem case, the center of mass of the protein was about 60
Angstroms away from that of the ligand.  Thus, wsing the GPF file created by
mkgpf3 caused autogrid3 to produce useless affinity map files, presumably,
because the protein was completely outside of the grid.  Naturally, the
affinities to every point in the grid would have been zero (or whatever you
defined constant to be) if the protein is nowhere to be found in the grid.
The most frustrating part of this was that there were no warning or error
messages.  In fact, the final message reported "autogrid3: Successful
Completion."  But of course, using these atom affinity maps leads to
unsuccessful docking with autodock3.

	The solution is to edit the GPF file created by mkgpf3, using
"gridcenter auto" instead of "gridcenter x.xx y.yy z.zz".  The auto option,
as documented, uses the macromolecule's center of mass as the grid center.

--Matt Lee

*******************************************************************
Matthew Randolph Lee, Ph.D.

Computational Scientist		phone:  (858)410-6534
Lion Bioscience Inc.		fax:    (858)410-6665
9880 Campus Point Drive	      e-mail:  matthew.lee@lionbioscience.com
San Diego, CA  92121
*******************************************************************

------_=_NextPart_001_01C23722.A2102CE0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>solution to empty affinity maps by autodock's autogrid</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <FONT SIZE=3D2>I have =
found the solution to my problem with Autodock 3.0's autogrid3.&nbsp; =
As reported earlier, autogrid3 was creating grid map files with all =
zero's (or whatever &quot;constant&quot; was defined to in the GPF =
file).</FONT></P>

<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <FONT SIZE=3D2>Again, =
with one ligand, everything works fine, but in another ligand that =
happened to be much more flexible, I was having autogrid3 =
problems.&nbsp; The extra flexibility was unrelated to the =
problem.</FONT></P>

<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <FONT SIZE=3D2>The =
problem lies in the &quot;gridcenter&quot; line of the GPF file.&nbsp; =
I used (as recommended by the manual) mkgpf3 to create the GPF file, =
but this mkgpf3 script defines the center of the grid based on the =
ligand's coordinates, not based on the protein's (the manual does not =
say it's doing this).&nbsp; Perhaps this is a feature in some =
instances?!?!&nbsp; </FONT></P>

<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <FONT SIZE=3D2>In my =
problem case, the center of mass of the protein was about 60 Angstroms =
away from that of the ligand.&nbsp; Thus, wsing the GPF file created by =
mkgpf3 caused autogrid3 to produce useless affinity map files, =
presumably, because the protein was completely outside of the =
grid.&nbsp; Naturally, the affinities to every point in the grid would =
have been zero (or whatever you defined constant to be) if the protein =
is nowhere to be found in the grid.&nbsp; The most frustrating part of =
this was that there were no warning or error messages.&nbsp; In fact, =
the final message reported &quot;autogrid3: Successful =
Completion.&quot;&nbsp; But of course, using these atom affinity maps =
leads to unsuccessful docking with autodock3.</FONT></P>

<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <FONT SIZE=3D2>The =
solution is to edit the GPF file created by mkgpf3, using =
&quot;gridcenter auto&quot; instead of &quot;gridcenter x.xx y.yy =
z.zz&quot;.&nbsp; The auto option, as documented, uses the =
macromolecule's center of mass as the grid center.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>--Matt Lee</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT =
SIZE=3D2>***************************************************************=
****</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Matthew Randolph Lee, Ph.D.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Computational Scientist =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; phone:&nbsp; =
(858)410-6534</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Lion Bioscience Inc.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; fax:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
(858)410-6665</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>9880 Campus Point Drive =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; e-mail:&nbsp; =
matthew.lee@lionbioscience.com</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>San Diego, CA&nbsp; 92121</FONT>
<BR><FONT =
SIZE=3D2>***************************************************************=
****</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C23722.A2102CE0--


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 06:13:38 2002
Received: from delta.cti.unav.es ([159.237.12.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g6UADbf28513
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 06:13:38 -0400
Received: from alumni.unav.es ([159.237.72.47])
	by delta.cti.unav.es (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g6UADZf30295
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:13:35 +0200
Sender: jj@delta.cti.unav.es
Message-ID: <3D467467.6C469021@alumni.unav.es>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:11:35 +0200
From: Jose Javier Cuadrado <jcuasan@alumni.unav.es>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; IRIX64 6.5 IP30)
X-Accept-Language: es, en, it, fr-FR
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCL <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Secondary amines 
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------13A1D2B1FAB8AD6B1A5A2245"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------13A1D2B1FAB8AD6B1A5A2245
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi to all


            I am working with a molecule that contains a secondary amine
group. Its sustituents are:


        +a benzyl group
        +a phenyl ring


            I would like to know if that NH is a possible hydrogen bond
acceptor. I have not found two much information. Could anybody tell me
any reference about that class of secondary amines and their role as
hydrogen bond acceptors?

            Thanks in advance

--------------13A1D2B1FAB8AD6B1A5A2245
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="jcuasan.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Jose Javier Cuadrado
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="jcuasan.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Cuadrado Sanchez;Jose Javier 
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.unav.es/organica/jj/
org:Universidad de Navarra;Dpto. Qca. Organica y Farmaceutica
adr:;;C/Irunlarrea 1;Pamplona ;;31080;Espanna
version:2.1
email;internet:jcuasan@alumni.unav.es
x-mozilla-cpt:;26944
fn:Jose Javier Cuadrado Sanchez
end:vcard

--------------13A1D2B1FAB8AD6B1A5A2245--



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 12:16:12 2002
Received: from mail.chem.tamu.edu ([165.91.176.8])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g6UGGCf03238
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:16:12 -0400
Received: from [165.91.177.32] (account yubofan HELO mail.chem.tamu.edu)
  by mail.chem.tamu.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.2)
  with ESMTP id 1799487 for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:16:30 -0500
Sender: yubo@ccl.net
Message-ID: <3D46BC6A.385B8C7A@mail.chem.tamu.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:18:50 -0500
From: Yubo Fan <yubofan@mail.chem.tamu.edu>
Organization: Chemistry Department, Texas A&M University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP28)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Fixing bondlength doesn't work
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by server.ccl.net id g6UGGCf03239

Hi, everyone,

I met a problem in recent days. I tried to use OPT=ModRedun option in
G98 to fix a bondlength in my research system but it doesn't work for
some of my cases. The related output is listed below:


 The following ModRedundant input section has been read:
 B   15   16 F 1.9000
 Leave Link  101 at Tue Jul 30 15:58:11 2002, MaxMem=   67108864
cpu:       0.1

                         ----------------------------
                         !    Initial Parameters    !
                         ! (Angstroms and Degrees)  !
 ------------------------
-------------------------
 ! Name  Definition              Value          Derivative
Info.             !
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 ! R22   R(13,14)                1.0809         estimate
D2E/DX2             !
 ! R23   R(15,16)                1.9            estimate
D2E/DX2             !
 ! R24   R(15,36)                1.0453         estimate
D2E/DX2             !


Is there any way to solve this problem? I tried cartesian and internal
coordination input but both of them failed. Thanks in advance.

Yubo

--
============================================================
Yubo Fan                   Email: yubofan@mail.chem.tamu.edu
Department of Chemistry    Tel:   1-979-845-7222
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843
============================================================



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 12:28:23 2002
Received: from mail.chem.tamu.edu ([165.91.176.8])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g6UGSNf03603
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:28:23 -0400
Received: from [165.91.177.32] (account yubofan HELO mail.chem.tamu.edu)
  by mail.chem.tamu.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.2)
  with ESMTP id 1799548 for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:28:42 -0500
Sender: yubo@ccl.net
Message-ID: <3D46BF43.859D1EFF@mail.chem.tamu.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:31:00 -0500
From: Yubo Fan <yubofan@mail.chem.tamu.edu>
Organization: Chemistry Department, Texas A&M University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP28)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: share memory problem for G98 on Linux
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by server.ccl.net id g6UGSNf03604

Hi, everyone,

A share memory problem has always been bothering me for a long time
since I ran G98 jobs on Linux boxes. Often, I have to kill running jobs
manually to stop optimizations to wrong geometries. I just use "kill -9
'IDs of G98 job'". But, if I killed many times, I couldn't run parallel
jobs any more. Share memory cannot be available at all. I have to
restart the system to clean memory.

Any advice. Thanks in advance

Yubo


--
============================================================
Yubo Fan                   Email: yubofan@mail.chem.tamu.edu
Department of Chemistry    Tel:   1-979-845-7222
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843
============================================================



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 13:58:16 2002
Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu ([140.142.33.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g6UHwGf05342
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:58:16 -0400
Received: from mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.17])
	by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g6UHwBej009158
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:58:11 -0700
Received: FROM dante17.u.washington.edu BY mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jul 30 10:58:11 2002 -0700
Received: from localhost (jzheng73@localhost)
	by dante17.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g6UHwAK9080334
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:58:11 -0700
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: "J. Zheng" <jzheng73@u.washington.edu>
cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: help, insert surface to Charmm
In-Reply-To: <3D46BF43.859D1EFF@mail.chem.tamu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.44.0207301023270.90300-100000@dante17.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi, CCLers:

  My research project is related to protein adsorption on the surfaces.
In order to successfully finish this project, I write a FORTRAN code to
deal with this system which includes protein, explicit waters, counter
ions and surface by using CHARMM force field. Meanwhile, I try to use
CHARMM to handle the same system.

  Now, my program is almost ready for the charged surface. In order to
test the my program, I compared the my results with CHARMM's results for a
protein and water system.  Results are very close. but, my program is 30
times slower than CHARMM!! I use neighbour list to calculate nonbond
interactions, while CHARMM uses cell list to do it. So, my qustions
are

1) Except difference of neighbour list and cell list (I will change to
cell list soon), is there anything I need to pay attention to avoid
expensive calculations when I code program? any trick on the code?

2) Does anybody know how to add a surface to CHARMM? The surface coule be
as simple as charged balls, or as complex as self-assembling
monolayers. I can not find any tutorial or example to show how to do
that from internet.

  Thank for taking your time and energy to read my questions. I will
appreciate for your help.

  Jie


-----------------------------------------------
|  JIE ZHENG                          	      |
|  Department of Chemical Engineering	      |
|  University of Washington		      |
|  Seattle, WA 98105, USA   		      |
-----------------------------------------------
|  Tel:  (206) 616-6510 (o)		      |
| Email: jzheng73@u.washington.edu	      |
| Webpg: students.washington.edu/jzheng73     |
-----------------------------------------------



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 12:46:22 2002
Received: from web20210.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.65])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id g6UGkMf04014
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:46:22 -0400
Message-ID: <20020730164621.3862.qmail@web20210.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [130.83.244.130] by web20210.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 09:46:21 PDT
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 09:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hatice Can <alphacan2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: VERY LARGE Checkpoint file
To: chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dear All,

I am using Gaussian98 for CASSCF calculations.
I have a problem with reusing the checkpoint file.The
size of checkpoint file is over 6MB. When I want to
call it for using the geometry of molecule in another
calculation, the file can not be opened.

I will be glad for all the suggestions or advices.

Thank you and best regards,

Hatice

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 10:53:03 2002
Received: from md.huji.ac.il ([132.64.169.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g6UEr3f01981
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:53:03 -0400
Received: from md.huji.ac.il (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by md.huji.ac.il (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6UEr5DF925212;
	Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:53:05 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from localhost (anvarr@localhost)
	by md.huji.ac.il (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) with ESMTP id g6UEr5s5923515;
	Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:53:05 GMT
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:53:05 +0300
From: Anwar Rayan <anvarr@md.huji.ac.il>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
cc: <anvarr@md.huji.ac.il>
Subject: free software which could assign atom types
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.33_heb2.09.0207301750420.910431-100000@md.huji.ac.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hi all,

I have a molecule in two dimensions (connections between atoms) and
another one in three dimensions (PDB format). Is there any free software
which could assign atom types (hybridization state)?

Lot of thanks in advance
Anwar


-------------------------------------
Dr. Anwar Rayan
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
School of Pharmacy
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
P.O.B. 12065
Jerusalem 91120
Israel
Tel: +972-2-6757540
Mobile: +972-55-848-338
Fax: +972-2-6757-076
Email: anvarr@md.huji.ac.il
-------------------------------------



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 10:42:11 2002
Received: from cefni.aber.ac.uk ([144.124.16.40])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g6UEgAf01800
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:42:10 -0400
Received: from margaux.dcs.aber.ac.uk ([193.60.10.14] helo=aber.ac.uk)
	by cefni.aber.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.21 #1)
	id 17ZYBV-0002GK-00; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:41:13 +0100
Sender: dle@aber.ac.uk
Message-ID: <3D46A56F.2D0AB198@aber.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:40:47 +0100
From: David Enot <dle@aber.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP30)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hatice Can <alphacan2000@yahoo.com>
CC: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:MD with SYBYL
References: <20020729121449.31164.qmail@web20207.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------80FD0282ACFE7ACC3B83593C"
X-Originating-IP: 193.60.10.14
X-Sophos-Scanned: from dle@aber.ac.uk virus scanned OK
X-Originating-IP: 193.60.10.14


--------------80FD0282ACFE7ACC3B83593C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    Hello,

    If you want to carry a DM within Sybyl, you will need to merge the 2
molecular areas. Use the sybyl command line,
        e.g. : merge m2 m1. The result will be in m1 and carry out the
simulatin with m1.
    If you don't have the same coordinate systems, place manually your organic
compound within the cage, use the command FREEZE in the STATIC MODE before
merging m1 and m2.
    You can check the final result in mol2 file (by definition, its
dynamic.mol2).
    Finally, I'm sure that using Sybyl is a good idea to do such simulations
(Force field and DM algorithm). I think that lot of CCL's will indicate you a
better protocole.....

        Regards

           David

Hatice Can wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I try to do MD simulation with Sybyl 6.8.
> The system which will be simulated consists of an
> organic compound placed
> inside the zeolite supercage. I want to get conformers
> of organic
> compound when it is located inside the supercage of
> zeolite. I built the
> supercage and then I put the organic compound inside
> supercage. When I
> tried to built that system, I put the two molecules
> into two different
> areas, such as m1 and m2.For example, the organic
> compound is in m1 area
> and zeolite supercage is in m2 area.
>  I am not quite sure that if the md simulation
> consider the molecule in m1 area, can program take
> into account of the
> forces can affect from which zeolite supercage to
> compound in area m1.
>
> If you would like to sent to me any advice or
> suggestions, I will be glad.
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Hatice
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
> http://health.yahoo.com
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net

--
 *********************  David P. Enot, Ph D.  ***********************
 *  Department of Computer Science        Work   : +44 1970 622357  *
 *  Computational Biology Group           Fax    : +44 1970 628536  *
 *  U.W.A. - Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, UK     Mobile : +44 7779 030629  *
 *********************  Email : dle@aber.ac.uk  *********************



--------------80FD0282ACFE7ACC3B83593C
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
&nbsp;
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Hello,
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If you want to carry a DM within Sybyl, you will
need to merge the 2 molecular areas. Use the sybyl command line,
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; e.g. : merge m2 m1. The
result will be in m1 and carry out the simulatin with m1.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If you don't have the same coordinate systems, place
manually your organic compound within the cage, use the command FREEZE
in the STATIC MODE before merging m1 and m2.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; You can check the final result in mol2 file (by
definition, its dynamic.mol2).
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Finally, I'm sure that using Sybyl is a good idea
to do such simulations (Force field and DM algorithm). I think that lot
of CCL's will indicate you a better protocole.....
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Regards
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; David
<p>Hatice Can wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Dear All,
<p>I try to do MD simulation with Sybyl 6.8.
<br>The system which will be simulated consists of an
<br>organic compound placed
<br>inside the zeolite supercage. I want to get conformers
<br>of organic
<br>compound when it is located inside the supercage of
<br>zeolite. I built the
<br>supercage and then I put the organic compound inside
<br>supercage. When I
<br>tried to built that system, I put the two molecules
<br>into two different
<br>areas, such as m1 and m2.For example, the organic
<br>compound is in m1 area
<br>and zeolite supercage is in m2 area.
<br>&nbsp;I am not quite sure that if the md simulation
<br>consider the molecule in m1 area, can program take
<br>into account of the
<br>forces can affect from which zeolite supercage to
<br>compound in area m1.
<p>If you would like to sent to me any advice or
<br>suggestions, I will be glad.
<p>Thank you in advance,
<p>Kind regards,
<p>Hatice
<p>__________________________________________________
<br>Do You Yahoo!?
<br>Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
<br><a href="http://health.yahoo.com">http://health.yahoo.com</a>
<p>-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
<br>CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody&nbsp; | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net
-- To Admins
<br>Ftp: ftp.ccl.net&nbsp; |&nbsp; WWW: <a href="http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/">http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;
| Jan: jkl@ccl.net</blockquote>

<pre>--&nbsp;
&nbsp;*********************&nbsp; David P. Enot, Ph D.&nbsp; ***********************
&nbsp;*&nbsp; Department of Computer Science&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Work&nbsp;&nbsp; : +44 1970 622357&nbsp; *
&nbsp;*&nbsp; Computational Biology Group&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fax&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : +44 1970 628536&nbsp; *
&nbsp;*&nbsp; U.W.A. - Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, UK&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Mobile : +44 7779 030629&nbsp; *
&nbsp;*********************&nbsp; Email : dle@aber.ac.uk&nbsp; *********************</pre>
&nbsp;</html>

--------------80FD0282ACFE7ACC3B83593C--



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 14:12:06 2002
Received: from web12108.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.172.28])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id g6UIC6f05721
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:12:06 -0400
Message-ID: <20020730181206.84091.qmail@web12108.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.31.15.122] by web12108.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:12:06 PDT
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paula Andrea Jaramillo <pand@rocketmail.com>
Subject: dock in windows
To: chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

can you help me with  information about software dock
4.0 windows.i need some references about this program

    thank u .


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 19:53:55 2002
Received: from gandalf.cber.nih.gov ([128.231.52.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g6UNrsf17932
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:53:54 -0400
Received: from localhost (rvenable@localhost) by gandalf.cber.nih.gov (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id TAA27628; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:55:55 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:55:55 -0400
From: Rick Venable <rvenable@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
To: "J. Zheng" <jzheng73@u.washington.edu>
cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:help, insert surface to Charmm
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.44.0207301023270.90300-100000@dante17.u.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0207301920410.27584-100000@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, J. Zheng wrote:
>   My research project is related to protein adsorption on the surfaces.
> In order to successfully finish this project, I write a FORTRAN code to
> deal with this system which includes protein, explicit waters, counter
> ions and surface by using CHARMM force field. Meanwhile, I try to use
> CHARMM to handle the same system.
> 
>   Now, my program is almost ready for the charged surface. In order to
> test the my program, I compared the my results with CHARMM's results for a
> protein and water system.  Results are very close. but, my program is 30
> times slower than CHARMM!! I use neighbour list to calculate nonbond
> interactions, while CHARMM uses cell list to do it. So, my qustions
> are

Actually, CHARMM uses a stored neighbor list, which gets updated
frequently (e.g. every 10 or 20 integration steps).  The frequency
depends on the difference between CUTNB (list cutoff) and CTOFNB
(potential forced to zero).  There is a savings from not determining the
non-bond list on every integration step.  

I've been using and writing code for CHARMM for over 15 years, and I'm
not sure what you mean by a "cell list".

CHARMM has a couple different methods for handling boundary conditions,
one of which builds a second list of "image" atoms; these are periodic
replicas of real atoms used for nonbond calculations with real atoms
near the edge of the system.

> 1) Except difference of neighbour list and cell list (I will change to
> cell list soon), is there anything I need to pay attention to avoid
> expensive calculations when I code program? any trick on the code?

Avoid square roots, division, and trig fxns within inner loops.

> 2) Does anybody know how to add a surface to CHARMM? The surface coule be
> as simple as charged balls, or as complex as self-assembling
> monolayers. I can not find any tutorial or example to show how to do
> that from internet.

It depends on what properties you want the surface to have.  For simple
elastic collisions, something like the MMFP module in CHARMM might work.
For more sophisticated interactions with the surface, you might have to
use a planar slab of fixed atoms of the appropriate types.  

=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Rick Venable           29/500
FDA/CBER/OVRR Biophysics Lab
1401 Rockville Pike    HFM-419
Rockville, MD  20852-1448  U.S.A.
(301) 496-1905   Rick_Venable@nih.gov
ALT email:  rvenable@speakeasy.org
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Jul 30 15:58:24 2002
Received: from relay6.zonnet.nl ([62.58.50.103])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g6UJwNf07018
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:58:24 -0400
Received: from oac17.chem.vu.nl ([62.59.65.57]) by
          relay6.zonnet.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 ntr034 Mar 14
          2002 21:29:48) with ESMTP id H02VH501.BD1; Tue, 30 Jul 2002
          20:58:17 +0100 
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 21:57:50 +0200
Subject: Re: CCL:Hint geometry optimization
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-359747108
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482)
Cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
To: amor san juan <a_juanphd@yahoo.com>
From: Marcel Swart <swart@chem.vu.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20020729092341.90980.qmail@web12801.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-Id: <A0D920CE-A3F6-11D6-B763-000393998E16@chem.vu.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482)


--Apple-Mail-2-359747108
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=WINDOWS-1252;
	format=flowed

This is straightforward..
The numbers you see on the lines are the Cartesian coordinates in=20
Angstroms !!
I know cuz I tried to convert them into a C3D file (with my own=20
program), and succeeded:
    18  title
  C     1   -1.853000   14.311000   16.658000   63    2   10   12
  C     2   -2.107000   15.653000   16.758000   63    1    3    4
  H     3   -2.573000   16.191000   15.916000   11    2
  C     4   -1.774000   16.341000   17.932000   63    2    5    6
  H     5   -1.983000   17.421000   18.014000   11    4
  C     6   -1.175000   15.662000   19.005000   63    4    7    8
  H     7   -0.914000   16.201000   19.931000   11    6
  C     8   -0.914000   14.295000   18.885000   63    6    9   10
  H     9   -0.441000   13.744000   19.715000   11    8
  C    10   -1.257000   13.634000   17.708000   63    1    8   11
  H    11   -1.051000   12.555000   17.611000   11   10
  C    12   -2.193000   13.627000   15.496000   63    1   13   14
  N    13   -2.797000   14.235000   14.491000   73   12   15   16
  N    14   -1.762000   12.391000   15.309000   73   12   17   18
  H    15   -3.039000   13.707000   13.640000   11   13
  H    16   -3.026000   15.237000   14.558000   11   13
  H    17   -1.287000   11.890000   16.073000   11   14
  H    18   -1.901000   11.929000   14.399000   11   14

Any chemistry package can probably read the above coordinate set.
If you want I can generate the coordinates also in another format.

As for the hints on conversion of file formats, look for the Babel=20
program;
links to it can be found in the CCL archives.

On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 11:23 , amor san juan wrote:

> Hello all;
>
> This had been a problem to me many months. Hope
> somebody patient enough to point out what molecular
> package can give cartesian coordinates for benzamidine
> as follows:
>
> ATOM1  C1  BEN     1   -1.853  14.311  16.658  ben  C
> ATOM2  C2  BEN     1   -2.107  15.653  16.758  ben  C
> ATOM3  H2  BEN     1   -2.573  16.191  15.916  ben  H
> ATOM4  C3  BEN     1   -1.774  16.341  17.932  ben  C
> ATOM5  H3  BEN     1   -1.983  17.421  18.014  ben  H
> ATOM6  C4  BEN     1   -1.175  15.662  19.005  ben  C
> ATOM7  H4  BEN     1   -0.914  16.201  19.931  ben  H
> ATOM8  C5  BEN     1   -0.914  14.295  18.885  ben  C
> ATOM9  H5  BEN     1   -0.441  13.744  19.715  ben  H
> ATOM10 C6  BEN     1   -1.257  13.634  17.708  ben  C
> ATOM11 H6  BEN     1   -1.051  12.555  17.611  ben  H
> ATOM12 C7  BEN     1   -2.193  13.627  15.496  ben  C
> ATOM13 N1  BEN     1   -2.797  14.235  14.491  ben  N
> ATOM14 N2  BEN     1   -1.762  12.391  15.309  ben  N
> ATOM15 H11 BEN     1   -3.039  13.707  13.640  ben  H
> ATOM16 H12 BEN     1   -3.026  15.237  14.558  ben  H
> ATOM17 H21 BEN     1   -1.287  11.890  16.073  ben  H
> ATOM18 H22 BEN     1   -1.901  11.929  14.399  ben  H
>
> I tried 2 different commercial molecular modeling
> package both have MM & semiempirical yet, I cant find
> result of conformation as above. Based from what I did
> these 2 commercial packages generated small cartesian
> coordinates.
>
> Would someone please show where is the
> problem.....advice some reading journals.....or even
> give any ideas.
>
> Sincerely,
> Amor
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
> http://health.yahoo.com
>
>
> -=3D This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =3D-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To=20=

> Admins
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan:=20
> jkl@ccl.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=
=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96
Marcel Swart

Organische en Anorganische Chemie
Faculteit der Exacte Wetenschappen
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

De Boelelaan 1083
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands

F   +31-(0)20-4447488
E   swart@chem.vu.nl
W  http://go.to/m.swart
=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=
=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96

--Apple-Mail-2-359747108
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=WINDOWS-1252

This is straightforward..

The numbers you see on the lines are the Cartesian coordinates in
Angstroms !!

I know cuz I tried to convert them into a C3D file (with my own
program), and succeeded:

   18  title

 C     1   -1.853000   14.311000   16.658000   63    2   10   12

 C     2   -2.107000   15.653000   16.758000   63    1    3    4

 H     3   -2.573000   16.191000   15.916000   11    2

 C     4   -1.774000   16.341000   17.932000   63    2    5    6

 H     5   -1.983000   17.421000   18.014000   11    4

 C     6   -1.175000   15.662000   19.005000   63    4    7    8

 H     7   -0.914000   16.201000   19.931000   11    6

 C     8   -0.914000   14.295000   18.885000   63    6    9   10

 H     9   -0.441000   13.744000   19.715000   11    8

 C    10   -1.257000   13.634000   17.708000   63    1    8   11

 H    11   -1.051000   12.555000   17.611000   11   10

 C    12   -2.193000   13.627000   15.496000   63    1   13   14

 N    13   -2.797000   14.235000   14.491000   73   12   15   16

 N    14   -1.762000   12.391000   15.309000   73   12   17   18

 H    15   -3.039000   13.707000   13.640000   11   13

 H    16   -3.026000   15.237000   14.558000   11   13

 H    17   -1.287000   11.890000   16.073000   11   14

 H    18   -1.901000   11.929000   14.399000   11   14


Any chemistry package can probably read the above coordinate set.

If you want I can generate the coordinates also in another format.


As for the hints on conversion of file formats, look for the Babel
program;

links to it can be found in the CCL archives.


On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 11:23 , amor san juan wrote:


<excerpt>Hello all;


This had been a problem to me many months. Hope

somebody patient enough to point out what molecular

package can give cartesian coordinates for benzamidine

as follows:


ATOM1  C1  BEN     1   -1.853  14.311  16.658  ben  C

ATOM2  C2  BEN     1   -2.107  15.653  16.758  ben  C

ATOM3  H2  BEN     1   -2.573  16.191  15.916  ben  H

ATOM4  C3  BEN     1   -1.774  16.341  17.932  ben  C

ATOM5  H3  BEN     1   -1.983  17.421  18.014  ben  H

ATOM6  C4  BEN     1   -1.175  15.662  19.005  ben  C

ATOM7  H4  BEN     1   -0.914  16.201  19.931  ben  H

ATOM8  C5  BEN     1   -0.914  14.295  18.885  ben  C

ATOM9  H5  BEN     1   -0.441  13.744  19.715  ben  H

ATOM10 C6  BEN     1   -1.257  13.634  17.708  ben  C

ATOM11 H6  BEN     1   -1.051  12.555  17.611  ben  H

ATOM12 C7  BEN     1   -2.193  13.627  15.496  ben  C

ATOM13 N1  BEN     1   -2.797  14.235  14.491  ben  N

ATOM14 N2  BEN     1   -1.762  12.391  15.309  ben  N

ATOM15 H11 BEN     1   -3.039  13.707  13.640  ben  H

ATOM16 H12 BEN     1   -3.026  15.237  14.558  ben  H

ATOM17 H21 BEN     1   -1.287  11.890  16.073  ben  H

ATOM18 H22 BEN     1   -1.901  11.929  14.399  ben  H=20


I tried 2 different commercial molecular modeling

package both have MM & semiempirical yet, I cant find

result of conformation as above. Based from what I did

these 2 commercial packages generated small cartesian

coordinates.


Would someone please show where is the

problem.....advice some reading journals.....or even

give any ideas.


Sincerely,

Amor


__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better

http://health.yahoo.com



-=3D This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =3D-

CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To
Admins

Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan:
jkl@ccl.net








</excerpt>=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=
=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96

<bold>Marcel Swart

</bold>

Organische en Anorganische Chemie

Faculteit der Exacte Wetenschappen

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam


De Boelelaan 1083

1081 HV Amsterdam

The Netherlands


F   +31-(0)20-4447488

E   swart@chem.vu.nl

W  http://go.to/m.swart

=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=
=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=

--Apple-Mail-2-359747108--



