From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sat Feb  1 08:03:43 2003
Received: from prserv.net ([32.97.166.51])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h11D3hj01486
	for <Chemistry@ccl.net>; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 08:03:43 -0500
Received: from attglobal.net (dhcp065-029-080-040.indy.rr.com[65.29.80.40])
          by prserv.net (asmtp1) with SMTP
          id <2003020113034125102gd4uce>
          (Authid: jmmckel);
          Sat, 1 Feb 2003 13:03:41 +0000
Message-ID: <3E3B80AA.CC4DCF7D@attglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 08:09:15 +0000
From: jmmckel@attglobal.net
Reply-To: jmmckel@attglobal.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Celerons and ab initio
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Folks,

I'm sure the title cased some smiles...  But I am curious about how well
[poorly] ab initio codes run on something like the 1.4GHZ/256K Celeron
compared to the similar PIII chip, all else being equal.

Regards!

John McKelvey