From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sun Feb  9 16:53:32 2003
Received: from dh094-148.csb.sunysb.edu ([129.49.94.148])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h19LrWI16853
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 9 Feb 2003 16:53:32 -0500
Received: from dh094-148.csb.sunysb.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by dh094-148.csb.sunysb.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h19LkZia016155
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 9 Feb 2003 16:46:35 -0500
Received: from localhost (cuigl@localhost)
	by dh094-148.csb.sunysb.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id h19LkYqQ016151
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 9 Feb 2003 16:46:35 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: dh094-148.csb.sunysb.edu: cuigl owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 16:46:34 -0500 (EST)
From: "CUI, Guanglei" <cuigl@morita.chem.sunysb.edu>
X-X-Sender: cuigl@dh094-148.csb.sunysb.edu
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: MEAD pKa calculations
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302091627001.16128-100000@dh094-148.csb.sunysb.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCL readers, 
     I'm trying to use MEAD to calculate pKa of three residues in a
     ligand binding site. The structure has been minimized with AMBER
     force field with explicit solvent. The charges of these residues
     have been derived from RESP calculations. All needed files are
     created and multiflex calculation used epsin = 4.0. After the
     calculation, the intrinsic pKas of two residues are very
     surprising. So here's my questions:

     1. What could be reasons that the self interactions for residue UNK
     and LYS are very big. 
     2. During the multiflex calculation, I was warned of "vertex
     found with count = 2" three times. How should I deal with this? 
     3. Do I need to include explicit solvent molecules in the
     calculation, generally speaking? The binding site is not completely
     buried. 
     4. LYS (protonated) has 3 equivalent hydrogens. It's not very clear
     to me which one should be zero charged in LYS.st file. 
     
     Here're the .summ file. Sorry for the lengthy description. Any
     suggestions are welcome. Thanks in advance. 

   site name           pKmod      delta self    delta back      pkint
       UNK-259           7.8       23.1134      -5.41211       25.5013
       LYS-162          10.4      -11.4993       1.32968        0.23042
       TYR-155           9.6      0.694971      -1.28149        9.01348


-- 
Guanglei Cui
Dept. of Chemistry
SUNY at Stony Brook
Stony Brook, NY 11790


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sat Feb  8 05:24:25 2003
Received: from vimg1.rdg.ac.uk ([134.225.112.81])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h18AOPI24286
	for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 05:24:25 -0500
Received: from vimv1.rdg.ac.uk ([134.225.16.87])
	by vimg1.rdg.ac.uk (Exim: gateway)
	with esmtp id 18hS9o-0001Zl-00
	for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 10:24:24 +0000
Received: from vimh1.rdg.ac.uk ([134.225.16.83])
	by vimv1.rdg.ac.uk (Exim: virusscanner)
	with esmtp id 18hS9i-0005oQ-00
	for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 10:24:18 +0000
Received: from suts1-p7.rdg.ac.uk ([134.225.114.7] helo=reading.ac.uk)
	by vimh1.rdg.ac.uk (Exim: host)
	with esmtp id 18hS9e-0003p2-00
	for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 10:24:14 +0000
Message-ID: <3E44DBAA.E85866E1@reading.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 10:27:54 +0000
From: David Price <d.w.price@reading.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Comp Chem Mailing List <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>
Subject: how to 'protect' point charges in Gaussian?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanner: exiscan *18hS9i-0005oQ-00*wvR6dt0JOzY* (The University of Reading)

Fellow CCLers,
 I am trying to set up a calculation that has an oxide cluster
surrounded by point charges, but want to restrict the ability of the
oxide ions to polarise to much towards the positive point charges.
The point charges are included to mimic other ions in a lattice and thus

even the positive charges will repel the electron gas cloud of the oxide

ions at some distance from the point charge corresponding to the
positive
ion's 'radius'.  How do I do this in Gaussian?  I thought of using
pseudo-potentials centred on the positive point charges, but wasn't sure

if I could get one the right shape.
 Help much appreciated.
    Cheers,
        Dave


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. David W. Price MA CChem MRSC      Tel: +44 (0)118 9318453 (messages)

Visiting Research Fellow,
Department of Chemistry,              Fax: +44 (0)118 9316331
University of Reading,                mailto:d.w.price@reading.ac.uk
Whiteknights,
READING   RG6 6AD
U.K.

------------------------------------------------------------------------





