From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu Mar 13 08:53:49 2003
Received: from typhoeus.chem.york.ac.uk ([144.32.72.225])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h2DDrn507737
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:53:49 -0500
Received: from ysbl.york.ac.uk (rasher [144.32.20.17])
	by typhoeus.chem.york.ac.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2DDrkxZ029253
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:53:47 GMT
Sender: greaves@typhoeus.chem.york.ac.uk
Message-ID: <3E708D6A.FDD84C09@ysbl.york.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:53:46 +0000
From: Richard Greaves <greaves@ysbl.york.ac.uk>
Reply-To: greaves@ysbl.york.ac.uk
Organization: York Structural Biology Laboratory
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Using PCM for single point SCF on larger systems
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

I'm trying run single point SCF calculations on an atomic systems of
between 70 and 100 atoms.

Has anyone out there got experience of using PCM on large systems? What
dimensions are optimal in GAMESS for such runs - i.e. what should I set
MXSP and MXTS to?

Richard Greaves,
University of York, UK.

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu Mar 13 19:54:13 2003
Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu ([140.142.33.19])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h2E0sC527863
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:54:12 -0500
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9])
	by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW03.03/8.12.1+UW02.12) with ESMTP id h2E0s1Lv006692
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:54:02 -0800
Received: from u.washington.edu (konga.chem.washington.edu [128.95.128.222])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW03.03/8.12.1+UW02.12) with ESMTP id h2E0s1wa001247
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT)
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:54:01 -0800
Message-ID: <3E71283C.1010402@u.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:54:20 -0800
From: Carsten Detering <detering@u.washington.edu>
Organization: University of Washington
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: LUDI for RNA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi everybody,

I would like to know if someone has tried to use LUDI with other 
molecules than proteins, and if that works at all.
Thanks for helpful comments,

Carsten


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carsten Detering, Ph.D.
University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98195
Fon 206.543.5081
Fax 206.685.8665
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Mar 12 15:58:57 2003
Received: from alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca ([142.150.224.224])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h2CKwv503664
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:58:57 -0500
Received: from chem.utoronto.ca (zigoto [142.150.226.11])
	by alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2CKwqF28956
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:58:52 -0500
Message-ID: <3E6F9F8C.4000600@chem.utoronto.ca>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:58:52 -0500
From: Jeremy Schofield <jmschofi@chem.utoronto.ca>
Reply-To: jmschofi@chem.utoronto.ca
Organization: Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011126 Netscape6/6.2.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Canadian Computational Chemistry Conf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

  First Announcement and Call for Abstracts
         5th Canadian Computational Chemistry Conference (CCCC5)
             http://www.chem.utoronto.ca/symposium/cccc5/

We are pleased to announce that the 5th annual Canadian Computational
Chemistry Conference will be held in Toronto, Canada on July 27-30, 2003.
The meeting is intended to foster the excellence of computational chemistry
in Canada. One of the principal goals of the conference is to highlight the
impact of computational chemistry in academia, industry and society. As in
the previous incarnations of this meeting, a program covering major new
directions in research and applications of the computational discipline has
been put together, with a special emphasis on computational chemistry
applied to biophysics and material science. For this purpose, we have
prepared a program of speakers actively involved in developing new methods
and applications of high performance computing in chemistry and related
areas.

The meeting will be held on the campus of the University of Toronto, with
inexpensive rooms available on campus and in nearby hotels at special rates.
Toronto is an exciting, diverse city with many attractions, ranging from
excellent museums to fine dining. Since Toronto is the largest urban centre
in Canada, travel to and from the city is easy and relatively inexpensive.
The costs of the meeting are modest (all figures in Canadian dollars):
             Students/Post-docs: $100 (early) - $130 (after June 1)
             All others: $300 (early) - $330 (after June 1)
             Included in the prices above are registration, Banquet and
Reception.

This edition of the conference targets a number of areas in which
computational chemistry has a large impact, including applications in
material science, computational studies of rough energy landscapes, soluble
and membrane proteins, advances in structure-based drug design,
self-assembly, membranes, and transport, in-silico adme/tox in drug
discovery, and the development of new methods in quantum chemistry. A number
of outstanding researchers have been invited for the fifth edition of this
meeting, including:

     Tucker Carrington (UdeM)
     Emily Carter (UCLA)
     Gerbrand Ceder (MIT)
     G.M. Crippen (Michigan)
     Gabriel Cruciani (ADME Perugia)
     Julian Gale (Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine)
     Angel Garcia (LANL)
     Shekhar Garde (Rensselaer)
     Phillip Geissler (MIT)
     P. Grutenhuis (Deltagen)
     Hannes Jonsson (Iceland)
     Leslie Kuhn (Michigan State)
     Glen Martyna (Indiana)
     Andrew McCammon (UCSD)
     Gilles Peslherbe (Concordia)
     Enrico Purísima (BRI Montréal)
     D. Reichman (Harvard)
     Pierre-Nicolas Roy (Alberta)
     Klaus Schulten (UIUC)
     Michiel Sprik (Cambridge University)
     Peter Tieleman (Calgary)

Each session of the meeting will consist of a combination of a number of
invited lectures complemented by several oral presentations selected from
submitted abstracts. In addition, an important component of the conference
will be two poster sessions covering all aspects of computational chemistry.
Abstracts from all sectors including industry, academia and government are
welcome.  We strongly encourage you and any interested colleague to visit
the conference web page, submit an abstract, and attend this informal,
"Gordon Conference" style meeting.

For submission of poster abstracts please go to our website
             (http://www.chem.utoronto.ca/symposium/cccc5/)
and follow the instructions for electronic submission.

We hope to see you there!

The Organizing Committee:
--------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Schofield,
Department of Chemistry,
University of Toronto
http://www.chem.utoronto.ca/staff/JMS/schofield_j.html

John S. Tse,
Steacie Institute for Molecular Science,
National Research Council of Canada
http://www.sims.nrc.ca/sims/theory_e.html

Sanjay Srivastava,
Chemistry Department,
AstraZeneca R&D Montreal
http://www.astrazeneca-montreal.com

Régis Pomès,
Structural Biology & Biochemistry,
Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
http://www.sickkids.on.ca/research/custom/profiles/p



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu Mar 13 12:42:43 2003
Received: from mail.cm.utexas.edu ([146.6.135.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h2DHgh516319
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:42:43 -0500
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dummy.domain.name (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C59E1A75C
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:42:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail.cm.utexas.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.cm.utexas.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id EF6881A6DB
	for <chemistry@ccl.net.>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:42:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from 146.6.144.166
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user smwilliams)
        by mail.cm.utexas.edu with HTTP;
        Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:42:42 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <4979.146.6.144.166.1047577362.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:42:42 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Ab inito/DFT calculations on non-unity multiplicity metal complexes
From: "Sheldon M. Williams" <smwilliams@mail.cm.utexas.edu>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
Reply-To: smwilliams@mail.cm.utexas.edu
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.10)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h2DHgh516320


Hello,

I have been having problems with SCF convergence and running out of memory
trying to perform ab inito geometry optimization calculations on Cu(II)
and Fe(III) ion complexes with crown ethers. I run MMFF conformational
searches with the ion constrained near the center of the crown ether ring
to get close to the global minimum, as I get poor configurations with low
level calculations if I do not contrain these metal ions. I then do a PM3
geometry
optimization, if possible. After this I have attempted both ROHF/ and
UOHF/3-21G*, 6-31G*, and LACVP* geometry optimizations with SCF cycles set
to up to 5000, but the calculation always runs out of memory. I'm
performing the calculations with Spartan PC 2002 on a 2.0GHz P4 with 1.0GB
of SDRAM. Trying to perform a DFT calculation directly from the MMFF or
semi-emperical geometry has worse SCF convergence and memory problems.

It appears to be a problem of the multiplicities of these complexes as
Ag(I) and Cu(I) work. Almost all papers on ab initio or DFT calculations
on transition metal-ligand complexes use the oxidation state with
singlet multiplicity. I haven't gotten any useful info from support at
wavefunction. I would be grateful if you could suggest what the
problem might be or direct me somewhere I could find help?

Thank you for your time and attention,

Sheldon M. Williams
Ph.D. Candidate, Analytical Chemistry
Jennifer Brodbelt Lab
Chem & Biochem Department
1 University Station A5300
University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78712
Phone:(512)471-0041
FAX: (512)471-8696
E-mail: smwilliams@mail.cm.utexas.edu






From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu Mar 13 18:43:01 2003
Received: from cascara.uvic.ca ([142.104.5.28])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h2DNh1526052
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:43:01 -0500
Received: from unix6.uvic.ca (unix6.uvic.ca [142.104.5.87])
	by cascara.uvic.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2DNgoDt187892;
	Thu, 13 Mar 2003 15:42:56 -0800
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 15:42:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Roy Jensen <royj@uvic.ca>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: O2(a-X) splitting
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303120442150.9100-100000@einstein.che.utexas.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.52.0303111544540.59712@unix6.uvic.ca>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303120442150.9100-100000@einstein.che.utexas.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-UVic-Virus-Scanned: OK - Passed virus scan by Sophos (sophie) on cascara
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.19 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)

All

I was looking at the splitting between the a-1-delta and X-3-sigma states
of oxygen using the UQCISD/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory. The calculated
singlet-triplet spacing is 47 % higher than the experimentally observed
value (11618 vs 7918 cm-1, respectively). I am sure there is a ready
explanation for this; however, I am drawing a blank...any insights
would be greatly appreciated!

Roy Jensen

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Comment: available at www.consol.ca

------END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK------


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu Mar 13 22:02:40 2003
Received: from sina.com ([202.106.187.156])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id h2E32a530494
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 22:02:37 -0500
Message-Id: <200303140302.h2E32a530494@server.ccl.net>
Received: (qmail 42356 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2003 02:46:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO njuitccwx) (202.119.32.27)
  by 202.106.187.156 with SMTP; 14 Mar 2003 02:46:26 -0000
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:56:59 +0800
From: wxin <wxinnju@sina.com>
To: "chemistry@ccl.net" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: symmetry in G98
X-mailer: FoxMail 3.11 [cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear CCL-lister, 
When I use Gaussian98 to do CASSCF calculation I found that 
the program can not identify the symmetry of some orbitals. Does anyone can give me some advice on this problem?
  
  Thank you. 


               Xin Wang 
               Institute of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry
               College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
               Nanjing University
               Nanjing, 210093
               P. R. China  




