From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 21 09:18:29 2003
Received: from f1n1.spenet.wfu.edu ([152.17.8.11])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h2LEITr31612
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:18:29 -0500
Received: from wfu.edu (swofford.computer.wfu.edu [152.17.95.72])
	by f1n1.spenet.wfu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2LEIJU112128
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:18:19 -0500
Message-ID: <3E7B1F27.1020106@wfu.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:18:15 -0500
From: Robert Swofford <swofford@wfu.edu>
Organization: Wake Forest University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en,zh-TW,zh-CN,zh,ja,ko,tr,ru
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCL Listserv <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Multiprocessor scheduling G98/Linda on a Linux cluster
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

We have a new Beowulf cluster and have recently installed Gaussian98 with the 
Linda parallel-processing utilities. If I understand correctly, the installed 
version of G98 (g98L?) recognizes when it's running on a cluster, and if 
requested, will execute the parallelized sections of the code on multiple 
processors. I see in the Link 0 section of the g98 input a variable, %NProc=N, 
which requests multiple processors (it's also available in default.route).

What I don't understand is how the batch scheduler sets aside the needed 
processors and identifies them to g98. We are running the portable batch 
scheduler (OpenPBS) with the Maui scheduler instead of the default OpenPBS 
FIFO scehduler. Do I just tell PBS the number of nodes to reserve? I can't see 
how that information gets from the scheduler to g98. Please respond off-list, 
and I will summarize for the list.

Can someone who is running g98/Linda on a similar system share with me your 
batch script and perhaps clear up my confusion? I hesitate to dig into the 
code when I know that others have figured this out!

Thanks in advance for your help!
Bob Swofford

-- 
Robert L. Swofford
Professor of Chemistry
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, NC 27109-7486
swofford@wfu.edu
http://www.wfu.edu/~swofford/
(336)-758-4490 Telephone
(336)-758-4656 FAX


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 21 08:31:12 2003
Received: from mailhub.health.nb.ca ([207.179.181.34])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h2LDVBr30634
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:31:11 -0500
Received: from health.nb.ca ([10.10.94.100]) by mailhub.health.nb.ca
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
          ID# 607-58282U90000L90000S0V35) with ESMTP id ca
          for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:31:10 -0400
Message-ID: <3E7B132E.3050004@health.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:27:10 -0400
From: miroslavac@health.nb.ca (Miroslava Cuperlovic-Culf)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ccl <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: protein folding
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------020907000906030006070806"


--------------020907000906030006070806
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear All,
I need an advice. I am trying to get some functional information about 
several proteins with only primary structures known and (at least for 
most parts) without similarity with any proteins with known 3d 
structure. So I am trying to use predicted structures from 
bioinformatics ab initio methods.  The question is: in your opinion 
should I further energy minimize obtained 3D structure of a protein 
backbone or would that just ruin statistical prediction.
Any experiences, ideas, hints or references would be appreciated
All the best
Mira

-

--------------020907000906030006070806
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <title></title>
</head>
<body>
Dear All,<br>
I need an advice. I am trying to get some functional information about several
proteins with only primary structures known and (at least for most parts)
without similarity with any proteins with known 3d structure. So I am trying
to use predicted structures from bioinformatics ab initio methods.&nbsp; The question
is: in your opinion should I further energy minimize obtained 3D structure
of a protein backbone or would that just ruin statistical prediction.<br>
Any experiences, ideas, hints or references would be appreciated<br>
All the best<br>
Mira<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"
 color="#000099"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
 href="mailto:miroslavac@health.nb.ca"></a> </font> </div>
</body>
</html>

--------------020907000906030006070806--



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 21 12:06:03 2003
Received: from mail.ic.sunysb.edu ([129.49.1.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h2LH62r03278
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:06:03 -0500
Received: from postal.ic.sunysb.edu (mail [129.49.1.4])
	by mail.ic.sunysb.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h2LH5xPK003345
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:06:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtp.ic.sunysb.edu ([129.49.1.24])
 by postal.ic.sunysb.edu (NAVGW 2.5.2.9) with SMTP id M2003032112060223799
 ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:06:02 -0500
Received: from sparky.ic.sunysb.edu (sparky.ic.sunysb.edu [129.49.1.3])
	by smtp.ic.sunysb.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2LH62Sc003360;
	Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:06:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (yonyang@localhost)
	by sparky.ic.sunysb.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2LH62lc015034;
	Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:06:02 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:06:02 -0500 (EST)
From: Yong Liang Yang <yonyang@ic.sunysb.edu>
To: jkl@ccl.net
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: .mmod and .dat file
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.51.0303211153540.13633@sparky.ic.sunysb.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear all:

I am trying to run a minimization job in Batch mode
using Macromodel program. My input files are .mmod files
(from Catalyst program) which contain the information for
all of the conformations for one single molecule. But
the .mmod file can not be run in Batch mode in Macromodel
(can be run in interactive mode) As manual says,the input
file type for batch mode should be .dat file,which seems
contain the information only for one conformation for
one molecule. Does anybody knows how to convert the .mmod
file into .dat file or how to run the .mmod file in Batch
mode? Many thanks in advance!


YL. Yang

SUNY-Stony Brook
631-632-5796

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Mar 21 18:18:12 2003
Received: from adenine.cgl.ucsf.edu ([169.230.27.3])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h2LNICr12011
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:18:12 -0500
Received: from localhost (socrates.cgl.ucsf.edu [169.230.27.3])
	by adenine.cgl.ucsf.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8/GSC1.16) with ESMTP id h2LNICVO943343
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:18:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Pradipta Bandyopadhyay <pradipta@cgl.ucsf.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: spherical harmonics!
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.53.0303211515400.943424@adenine.cgl.ucsf.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

 Hi,

   I am looking for regular spherical harmonics in cartesians for L > 4
 ( The book by A. J. Stone - the theory of intermolecular forces has
   until L=4, page 227). Can anyone help me with this?
 thanks.

       Pradipta




