From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Jul  3 13:04:22 2003
Received: from web15213.mail.bjs.yahoo.com (web15213.mail.bjs.yahoo.com [202.3.77.143])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h63Gqwqe006033
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:53:02 -0400
Message-ID: <20030703164342.10007.qmail.-at-.web15213.mail.bjs.yahoo.com>
Received: from [168.160.11.10] by web15213.mail.bjs.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 00:43:42 CST
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 00:43:42 +0800 (CST)
From: =?gb2312?q?Jinsong=20Zhao?= <zh_jinsong.-at-.yahoo.com.cn>
Subject: CCL: About Parabolic fields in CoMFA
To: CCL <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dear all,

I don't find what I need in the manual of QSAR about
the  parabolic fields. 

Anyone here could tell how to set the parameters,
e.g., cutoff values, etc., for parabolic fields.

Another questions, if it's reasonable to combine the
parabolic fields of CoMFA with the hydrophobic of
CoMSIA in one PLS analysis? I mean, if it's possible
to derive one QSAR model using two 3D-QSAR methods,
i.e., CoMFA and CoMSIA?

Any comments and suggestions will be very welcome!

Thanks in advance!

Regards,

Jinsong



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? 
9zDZ5gSJSC;'74@,;x5w2i@-?*a!D;
http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/?http://cn.tech.yahoo.com/zhuanti/laji/index.html


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Jul  3 09:32:51 2003
Received: from mail.cybermesa.com (mail.cybermesa.com [198.59.109.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h63DWoqe030882
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:32:51 -0400
Received: from dave (qwest98-dsl3.cybermesa.com [216.84.163.98])
	by mail.cybermesa.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h63DWnH24646
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 07:32:49 -0600 (MDT)
From: "David Miller" <dmiller.-at-.sageinformatics.com>
To: <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>
Subject: CCL: extended queries in ChemTK
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 07:33:59 -0500
Message-ID: <MCBBJOBEHFAHPGCENNNDEEBOCAAA.dmiller.-at-.sageinformatics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200

ChemTK version 2.5 evaluation is now available for download
> from http://www.chemtk.com

New features include:
  - Logical expression shorthand, allowing queries such as:
        cLogP < 2.0 && Target != "kinase"
        MolWeight <= 500 && ( slq c1ccccc1 || slq n1ccccc1 )
  - Filter new (unseen) molecule data into existing scaffold classes
  - R tables can be stored persistently in ChemTK (*.ctk) files
  - Export of similarity-screening results to ChemTK or text files
  - Columns can be added to, and deleted from, the Class View grid

Visit http://www.chemtk.com to download the ChemTK product sheet,
documentation, and release notes, and to learn more about the
inexpensive licensing terms.

Best regards,

David W. Miller, Ph.D.
Sage Informatics LLC
dmiller.-at-.sageinformatics.com


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Jul  3 06:58:25 2003
Received: from mail-b.bcc.ac.uk (mail-b.bcc.ac.uk [144.82.100.22])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h63AwPqe027720
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 06:58:25 -0400
Received: from socrates-a.ucl.ac.uk by mail-b.bcc.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer)
          with ESMTP; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:58:24 +0100
Received: (from uccatvm@localhost) by socrates-a.ucl.ac.uk (8.11.7+Sun/8.9.3)
          id h63AwND19813; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:58:23 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200307031058.h63AwND19813.-at-.socrates-a.ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: CCL:re DFT and small basis sets
To: chemistry.-at-.ccl.net (CCL)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:58:23 +0100 (BST)
Cc: T.vanMourik.-at-.ucl.ac.uk (Tanja van Mourik)
In-Reply-To: <3F02ECDD.D642E01A.-at-.trentu.ca> from "elewars" at Jul 02, 2003 10:31:57 AM
From: Tanja van Mourik <t.vanmourik.-at-.ucl.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi All,

Lynch, Zhao and Truhlar advocate including diffuse functions on
non-hydrogenic atoms when calculating reaction energies, barrier 
heights and conformational energies with DFT, see:
J Phys Chem A 107 (9): 1384-1388 (2003).

So I would recommend using 6-31+G* rather than 6-31G* as the smallest
basis set for yielding accurate results.

Tanja
-- 
  =====================================================================
   Tanja van Mourik                                                
   Royal Society University Research Fellow
   Chemistry Department 
   University College London  phone:  +44 (0)20-7679-4663      
   20 Gordon Street          e-mail: work: T.vanMourik.-at-.ucl.ac.uk 
   London WC1H 0AJ, UK               home: tanja_van_mourik.-at-.btopenworld.com

   http://www.chem.ucl.ac.uk/people/vanmourik/index.html
  =====================================================================

> 
> Re "Has anyone ever published a discussion of the accuracy of DFT at
> small basis sets?"
> 
> I'm not sure just what you consider small (most workers now would likely
> say that
> 6-31G* is small), but DFT calculations are known to be saturated by
> basis
> functions more quickly than are ab initio calculations. Here are three
> refs:
> 
> 1)  "Once the double split-valence level is reached, further improvement
> in basis
> set quality offers little in the way of structutal or energetic
> improvement." G.
> N. Merrill, S. Gronert, and S. R. Kass. J Phys Chem, 1997, _101_, 204.
> 
> 2)  "Our results also show that B3LYP calculations converge rapidly with
> 
> increasing basis set size and that the cost-to-benefit- ratio is optimal
> at the
> 6-31G* basis set level. 6-31G* will be the basis set of choice in B3LYP
> calculations on much larger molecules [than C4H6O2]." P. J. Stephens, F.
> J.
> Devlin, C. F. Chablowski, and M. J. Frisch, J Phys Chem, 1994, _98_,
> 11623, and
> refs therein.
> 
> 3)  In defiance of tradition, the unequivocally small 3-21G(*) set has
> been used
> to optimize carbene geometries: H. M. Muchall, N. H. Werstiuk, and B.
> Chodhurry,
> Can J Chem, 1998, _76_, 221.
> 
> (You my also find some useful info in E. Lewars, "Computational
> Chemistry",
> Kluwer, 2003; section 7.3.2.2).
> 
> E. Lewars
> ========
> 
> Ed Brothers wrote:
> 
> > Folks:
> >     Has anyone ever published a discussion of the accuracy of DFT at
> > small basis sets?
> >
> > Ed.
> > Merz group.
> > Penn State.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
> and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY.-at-.ccl.net
> 
> Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST.-at-.ccl.net 
> HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs 
> 
> If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
> Jan Labanowski,  jkl.-at-.ccl.net (read about it on CCL Home Page)
> -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




