From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jul  9 11:24:03 2003
Received: from postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (postoffice.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.7])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h69FO2qe019476
	for <chemistry-.at.-ccl.net>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:24:03 -0400
Received: from cornell.edu ([128.84.183.113])
	by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26345;
	Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:23:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:23:49 -0400
Subject: Re: CCL:AutoDock and protein-protein interactions
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
Cc: forum CCL <chemistry-.at.-ccl.net>
To: Dominique Vlieghe <Dominique.Vlieghe-.at.-dmbr.UGent.be>
From: Richard Gillilan <reg8-.at.-cornell.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1057306539.12980.2.camel-.at.-dmbr032.fvms.ugent.be>
Message-Id: <56D934AC-B221-11D7-9109-000393D59F68-.at.-cornell.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552)

> * a more specific question:
> A way of circumventing a huge grid would be to use a smaller grid
> (assuming that the interacting residues must be 'close' to the 
> receptor)
> and setting the extnrg parameters to 0.0 kcal mol-1 (meaning that atoms
> outside the grid would feel no field). Is this a correct assumption?
> Would this speed up the calculations?
>

I've done a bit of work on hierarchical grids ... it can
be done for linear interpolation, but higher order interpolations
pose some problems. Once I started doing a lot of docking,
I found that, for most proteins, grid size is not a problem
if you work in the principle axis coordinate system (obtained
by diagonalizing the inertial matrix). A cubic grid constructed
using maximum extents + a buffer length along those axes will save a 
dramatic
amount of space. Van der Waals grids die to zero much beyond 5A from 
the surface.
Electrostatic protentials need to be larger. I go out
20A from the surface with my grid, then use the multipole approximation
beyond that point to infinity. Total sum of grids (one electrostatic and
5 VDW in double precision) usually amount to only a couple hundred MB 
at 0.6A grid spacing.
(for linear interpolation, one might want a finer grid). Single 
precision could work
just fine if storage is a problem. One would have to put up with the 
cost of type
conversion however. The grids do add up if you do a lot. I gridded the 
whole protein-protein docking
benchmark of 58 structures (check out the ZDOCK web pages). It was 
quite a few GB.

Richard Gillilan
MacCHESS, Cornell

ps, I just came back from the protein-protein docking meeting at 
Stonybrook a week
ago. If there is interest, I suppose I could post a brief report.


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jul  8 16:31:55 2003
Received: from mail.uh.edu (SanJacinto.Mail.UH.EDU [129.7.69.101])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h68KVsqe002267
	for <chemistry{at}ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:31:55 -0400
Received: from conversion-daemon by mail.uh.edu
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2001.07.26.11.50.p9)
 id <0HHQ003013OWWL{at}mail.uh.edu> for chemistry{at}ccl.net; Tue,
 8 Jul 2003 15:31:44 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (Colorado.Mail.UH.EDU [129.7.69.103])
 by mail.uh.edu (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2001.07.26.11.50.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0HHQ001EY3OVU9{at}mail.uh.edu> for chemistry{at}ccl.net; Tue,
 08 Jul 2003 15:31:43 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 15:31:43 -0500 (CDT)
From: Niharendu.Choudhury{at}mail.uh.edu
Subject: averaging in CHARMM
To: chemistry{at}ccl.net
Message-id: <482398476.1057696303153.JavaMail.root@localhost>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Sun(TM) Web Access 1.2
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Hi all,
Thanks to all who replied me earlier, in particular, Rick Venable, Liisa laakkonen for their help/suggestion in hbuild. 

My present preblem is as follows:
When I am starting a MD run(production stage ) in CHARMM after equilibration for calculating averages of various quantities, it is adding up the same from the previous equilibration stages, which I don't want. I want only averages from the present run, NOT from earlier runs(equilibration etc.)
How can I achieve this?

Bye
Nihar





From chemistry-request@ccl.net Sun Jul  6 23:24:25 2003
Received: from cornell.edu (cornell.edu [132.236.56.6])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h673OPqe011133
	for <chemistry{at}ccl.net>; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:24:25 -0400
Received: from connie.summerhill (syr-24-58-0-128.twcny.rr.com [24.58.0.128])
	by cornell.edu (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA26694
	for <chemistry{at}ccl.net>; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Electric field and Gaussian
From: Connie Chang <cc236{at}cornell.edu>
To: chemistry{at}ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <200307070322.XAA25914{at}cornell.edu>
References: <200307070322.XAA25914{at}cornell.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) 
Date: 06 Jul 2003 23:24:25 -0400
Message-Id: <1057548265.7278.5.camel@connie>
Mime-Version: 1.0


 Hi CCLers--
 
 I was wondering what can be done with electric fields in Gaussian.  I've
 been told that Gaussian can't minimize the geometric coordinates of a
 molecule under an electric field.  But what can it do?  Will it give me
 how an electric field affects the electronic structure of a molecule? 
 Can I perform a hessian calculation/find normal modes under an electric
 field?
 
 Thank you,
 
 Connie
 
 
 




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jul  8 07:14:54 2003
Received: from alcides.host4u.net (alcides.host4u.net [216.71.64.98])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h68BErqe022761
	for <chemistry{at}ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 07:14:54 -0400
Received: from there (CPE0007954b9f8e-CM.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.43.141.144])
	by alcides.host4u.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h68BEre18322
	for <chemistry{at}ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 06:14:53 -0500
Message-Id: <200307081114.h68BEre18322{at}alcides.host4u.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Aniko Simon <aniko{at}simbiosys.ca>
Organization: SimBioSys Inc.
Subject: CCL: Announcing CAESA (Computer Assisted Estimation of Synthetic Accessibility)
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 03:11:55 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: CCL <chemistry{at}ccl.net>

SimBioSys is pleased to announce the release of CAESA v2.4 

CAESA stands for Computer Assisted Estimation of Synthetic Accessibility 
and it is a tool used to rank sets of molecules according to their ease 
of synthesis.  This is especially helpful when used in conjunction with 
de novo design software.

CAESA also assists the development of viable synthetic approaches by 
identifying suitable, readily available starting materials and 
retrosynthetic paths.  

CAESA uses the technology of expert systems to propose viable synthetic 
accessibility estimates and retrosynthetic routes.  The program uses two 
sources of information that can be customized to provide estimations 
specific to the chemistry employed in the company: 
(1) a database of available starting materials and 
(2) a reaction knowledge-base.

The presence of complexity-enhancing structural features (such as chiral 
centres or complex topological features) is detected in each target molecule. 
These features are used to assess the ease of synthesis of a compound. 

Conveniently, the client side of CAESA can be used via a web-browser on any 
operating system. The server side of the system can be installed either on 
Linux or SGI platform.
 
For further information about CAESA, please visit our web site at 
http://www.simbiosys.ca/  or contact us at info{at}simbiosys.ca
--
Aniko Simon Ph.D., aniko{at}simbiosys.ca, http://www.simbiosys.ca/ 


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jul  8 12:32:48 2003
Received: from cirse.saclay.cea.fr (cirse.saclay.cea.fr [132.166.192.127])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h68GWlqe030455
	for <chemistry*at*ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:32:48 -0400
Received: from argiope.saclay.cea.fr (argiope.saclay.cea.fr [132.166.192.108])
	by cirse.saclay.cea.fr (8.12.9/CEAnet-Internet.1.0) with ESMTP id h68GWkFL021818
	for <chemistry*at*ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 18:32:46 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from muguet.saclay.cea.fr (unverified) by argiope.saclay.cea.fr
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.10) with ESMTP id <T634f94dfd884a6c06c798*at*argiope.saclay.cea.fr> for <chemistry*at*ccl.net>;
 Tue, 8 Jul 2003 18:28:39 +0200
Received: from petunia.bruyeres.cea.fr (petunia.bruyeres.cea.fr [132.165.64.1])
	by muguet.saclay.cea.fr (8.12.9/CEAnet-Interne.1.0) with ESMTP id h68GVeKp017509
	for <chemistry*at*ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 18:31:40 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from styx.bruyeres.cea.fr (styx-e76.bruyeres.cea.fr [132.165.76.3])
          by petunia.bruyeres.cea.fr (8.9.3+Sun/jtpda-5.3.2) with ESMTP id SAA20604
          for <chemistry*at*ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 18:27:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by styx.bruyeres.cea.fr; id SAA03297; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 18:31:38 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <200307081631.SAA03297*at*styx.bruyeres.cea.fr>
Sender: mathieu*at*indre.ripault.cea.fr
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 17:59:58 +0200
From: Didier MATHIEU <Didier.Mathieu*at*cea.fr>
Organization: CEA
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [fr] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry*at*ccl.net
Subject: SUMMARY molecular mechanics parameters from ab initio calc
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------829AC08FF4A058A831A832F5"


--------------829AC08FF4A058A831A832F5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 Hello,

 Some weeks ago I asked about the best way to derive intramolecular
force
 field parameters from ab initio data. I got some replies pointing to
some
 references to the methology for deriving transferable force fields,
i.e.
 based on atom types:
 Per-Ola Norrby and Peter Brandt, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 212, 79-109.
Per-
 Ola Norrby and Tommy Liljefors, J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1146-1166
 Extensive examples are by Hagler et al (CFF) and Halgren (MMFF).  I'm
also
 been told about a commercial expensive program to make this kind of
job:
 http://www.aeontechnology.com/

 Two other replies, that exactly fit our needs, deal with the simpler
 problem, when one is interested in specific compounds and does not have
to
 mind about transferability.
 J.M. Seminario, "Calculation of intramolecular force fields from
second-
 derivative tensors",
 Int.J.Quant.Chem.: Quantum Chemistry Symposium 30, 1271-1277 (1996)
Further
 work along those lines appears to have been carried out by Marcel Swart

 <swart*at*chem.vu.nl> : IntraFF is currently within the submission phase
for
 J.Comput.Chem.; when it is accepted, I will make it generally
available.

 ======
 Thanks to Jerome Baudray, Geoff Hutchinson, Per-Ola Norrby, Michele
 Lunelli, Marcel Swart, Teodorico Ramalho for their replies, advice or
 interest.

--
Didier Mathieu
CEA - Le Ripault
BP 16
37260 Monts
Didier.Mathieu*at*cea.fr
Tel +33 02 47 34 41 85
Fax +33 02 47 34 51 42



--------------829AC08FF4A058A831A832F5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
&nbsp;Hello,
<p>&nbsp;Some weeks ago I asked about the best way to derive intramolecular
force
<br>&nbsp;field parameters from ab initio data. I got some replies pointing
to some
<br>&nbsp;references to the methology for deriving transferable force fields,
i.e.
<br>&nbsp;based on atom types:
<br>&nbsp;Per-Ola Norrby and Peter Brandt, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 212,
79-109.&nbsp; Per-
<br>&nbsp;Ola Norrby and Tommy Liljefors, J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1146-1166
<br>&nbsp;Extensive examples are by Hagler et al (CFF) and Halgren (MMFF).&nbsp;
I'm also
<br>&nbsp;been told about a commercial expensive program to make this kind
of job:
<br>&nbsp;<A HREF="http://www.aeontechnology.com/">http://www.aeontechnology.com/</A>
<p>&nbsp;Two other replies, that exactly fit our needs, deal with the simpler
<br>&nbsp;problem, when one is interested in specific compounds and does
not have to
<br>&nbsp;mind about transferability.
<br>&nbsp;J.M. Seminario, "Calculation of intramolecular force fields from
second-
<br>&nbsp;derivative tensors",
<br>&nbsp;Int.J.Quant.Chem.: Quantum Chemistry Symposium 30, 1271-1277
(1996) Further
<br>&nbsp;work along those lines appears to have been carried out by Marcel
Swart
<br>&nbsp;&lt;swart*at*chem.vu.nl> : IntraFF is currently within the submission
phase for
<br>&nbsp;J.Comput.Chem.; when it is accepted, I will make it generally
available.
<p>&nbsp;======
<br>&nbsp;Thanks to Jerome Baudray, Geoff Hutchinson, Per-Ola Norrby, Michele
<br>&nbsp;Lunelli, Marcel Swart, Teodorico Ramalho for their replies, advice
or
<br>&nbsp;interest.
<pre>--&nbsp;
Didier Mathieu
CEA - Le Ripault
BP 16
37260 Monts
Didier.Mathieu*at*cea.fr
Tel +33 02 47 34 41 85
Fax +33 02 47 34 51 42</pre>
&nbsp;</html>

--------------829AC08FF4A058A831A832F5--



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jul  8 00:15:34 2003
Received: from mx4.ust.hk (mx4.ust.hk [143.89.13.26])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h684FWqe015239
	for <chemistry!at!ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 00:15:33 -0400
Received: from ust.hk (sqmail2.ust.hk [143.89.13.12])
	by mx4.ust.hk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h684FSoT066579
	for <chemistry!at!ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:15:29 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from 143.89.53.94
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user chgy)
        by sqmail.ust.hk with HTTP;
        Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:15:29 +0800 (HKT)
Message-ID: <4860.143.89.53.94.1057637729.squirrel!at!sqmail.ust.hk>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:15:29 +0800 (HKT)
Subject: Problems on freqency calculations of PCM model in G03
From: "GAO Yi" <chgy!at!ust.hk>
To: <chemistry!at!ccl.net>
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.8)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dear CCLers,

I encounter a problem on l701 when I'm running the FREQ calculations of
PCM model in G03. Would you kindly give some advices?

Best

Yi Gao
Department of Chem
HKUST, HK

Input:
 %mem=200mb
 %chk=achc1.chk
 #p freq(noraman) rb3lyp/6-31g(d) scrf=(pcm,solvent=methanol) geom=allc
 heck

Output:

 Hexadecapole moment (field-independent basis, Debye-Ang**3):
 XXXX= -1712.3039 YYYY= -1041.7383 ZZZZ=  -346.5980 XXXY=   -17.9298
 XXXZ=   -14.8633 YYYX=    58.6465 YYYZ=    75.0827 ZZZX=   -18.0436
 ZZZY=    35.9187 XXYY=  -480.3303 XXZZ=  -364.6161 YYZZ=  -268.8508
 XXYZ=    14.9374 YYXZ=     1.2719 ZZXY=    19.0798
 N-N= 8.630549944201D+02 E-N=-3.152893967217D+03  KE= 6.067563047945D+02
  Exact polarizability: 144.726   6.192 129.223   7.834  -2.048 140.577
 Approx polarizability: 146.219   3.930 136.248  12.253  -7.650 176.150
 No NMR shielding tensors so no spin-rotation constants.
 Leave Link  601 at Sun Jul  6 20:15:38 2003, MaxMem=   26214400 cpu:     
 1.2
 (Enter /home/software/g03/l701.exe)
 Compute integral second derivatives.
 ... and contract with generalized density number  0.
 D1PCM: PCM CHGder 1st derivatives, ID1Alg=0 FixD1E=F DoIter=F I1PDM=0.
 D2PCM: PCM 2nd derivatives, FixD2E=F I1PDM=0.
 D2PCM-2 allocation failure:  iend,mxcore=  27114695  26069026
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /home/software/g03/l701.exe at Sun Jul  6
20:16:10 2003.
 Job cpu time:  0 days  3 hours 13 minutes 26.6 seconds.
 File lengths (MBytes):  RWF=    264 Int=      0 D2E=      0 Chk=      8
Scr=      1




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Mon Jul  7 09:18:17 2003
Received: from webmail.mta.ca (rash.mta.ca [138.73.1.30])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h67DIHqe027666
	for <chemistry(at)ccl.net>; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 09:18:17 -0400
Received: from nobody by webmail.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.04)
	id 19ZVso-0006Kv-00
	for chemistry(at)ccl.net; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 10:18:18 -0300
Received: from 138.73.24.166 ( [138.73.24.166])
	as user kgdct(at)mailserv.mta.ca by webmail.mta.ca with HTTP;
	Mon,  7 Jul 2003 10:18:18 -0300
Message-ID: <1057583898.3f09731a35489(at)webmail.mta.ca>
Date: Mon,  7 Jul 2003 10:18:18 -0300
From: kgdct(at)mta.ca
To: chemistry(at)ccl.net
Subject: Error #1 in AlGdDF message inquiry
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: 138.73.24.166



I was wondering if anyone has seen this error and if so if they knew how to 
solve the problem. I've encountered the same error a couple of times both on 
frequency calculation.

Raff turned off since only 58.29% of shell-pairs survive.
          There are  69 degrees of freedom in the 1st order CPHF.
  69 vectors were produced by pass  0.
 AX will form  35 AO Fock derivatives at one time.
  69 vectors were produced by pass  1.
  69 vectors were produced by pass  2.
  66 vectors were produced by pass  3.
  66 vectors were produced by pass  4.
  63 vectors were produced by pass  5.
 Error #1 in AlGdDF.
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /var/local/g98/l1002.exe.
 Job cpu time:  0 days  2 hours 29 minutes 37.9 seconds.


thanks so much
-Katie Doucet
Mount Allison University


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jul  8 11:07:11 2003
Received: from mailgw1.technion.ac.il (mailgw1.technion.ac.il [132.68.238.34])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h68F7Aqe027939
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:07:11 -0400
Received: by mailgw1.technion.ac.il (Postfix, from userid 60999)
	id 87595676FC; Tue,  8 Jul 2003 18:07:08 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from techunix.technion.ac.il (techunix.technion.ac.il [132.68.1.28])
	by mailgw1.technion.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC327676F6
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Tue,  8 Jul 2003 18:07:07 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from tx.technion.ac.il (mandrake.technion.ac.il [132.68.86.138])
	by techunix.technion.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA57721ECC
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Tue,  8 Jul 2003 18:07:07 +0300 (IDT)
Message-ID: <3F0AE023.10104~at~tx.technion.ac.il>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 18:15:47 +0300
From: Irena Efremenko <chrirena~at~techunix.technion.ac.il>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en, ru, he
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ccl <chemistry~at~ccl.net>
Subject: c8698 utility
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear CCLers,


I want to use g94 checkpoint file for g98 calculations. Running c8698 
utility I get the following message:

  Fixing /Label/
  Fixing /B/, old MaxShl= 2500.
  ILSW is already fixed
  Fixing /Mol/, old MaxAtm= 1000.
  Fixing /LP2/, old MaxAtm= 1000.
  Fixing /SymInf/.
  Fixing /Info/.
  Fixing IOEDrv.

chkchk utility can read it saying:

  Title:  ....
  Route:  .....
  Atomic coordinates present.
  MO coefficients present.
  Internal force constants may be present.

But g98 cannot use it:

  (Enter /usr/local/g98/l101.exe)
  ---------------------------------------------------
  Title
  ---------------------------------------------------
  Redundant internal coordinates taken from checkpoint file:
  myfile.chk
  Charge =  0 Multiplicity = 1
  Operation on file out of range.
FileIO: IOper= 2 IFilNo(1)= 20665 Len=        1632 IPos=           0 Q= 
       5390846208

  dumping /fiocom/, unit = 1 NFiles =    14 SizExt =    524288 WInBlk = 
      1024                   defal = T LstWrd =      709632 FType=2 
FMxFil=10000

Does somebody here know what does it means and how to overcome it?

Thanks,
-- 
Dr. Irena Efremenko
Wolfson Department of Chemical Engineering
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
Haifa 32000, Israel
Phone: 972-4-8293561
Fax: 972-4-8295672



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Mon Jul  7 17:15:49 2003
Received: from antigen.scripps.edu (relay1.scripps.edu [137.131.200.29])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h67LFmqe009723
	for <chemistry..at..ccl.net>; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:15:48 -0400
Received: from relay1.scripps.edu(137.131.200.29) by antigen.scripps.edu via csmap 
	 id 10241; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 14:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from antigen.scripps.edu (gamow [137.131.252.67])
	by relay1.scripps.edu (8.11.7/TSRI-4.4.1r) with SMTP id h67LFlC17607
	for <chemistry..at..ccl.net>; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gamow.scripps.edu(137.131.252.67) by antigen.scripps.edu via csmap 
	 id 10234; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 14:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from quine.scripps.edu (dhcp-252-215 [137.131.252.215])
	by gamow.scripps.edu (8.9.2/TSRI-3.0.1) with SMTP id OAA134709
	for <chemistry..at..ccl.net>; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by quine.scripps.edu (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:15:47 -0700
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:15:47 -0700
From: "David A. Case" <case..at..scripps.edu>
To: chemistry..at..ccl.net
Subject: New program available: PMEMD (Particle Mesh Ewald Molecular Dynamics)
Message-ID: <20030707211547.GA2340..at..scripps.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i



We are proud to announce the release of version 3.00 (the first version to be
generally released) of PMEMD (Particle Mesh Ewald Molecular Dynamics).

PMEMD is a new version of the Amber module "Sander", and has been written with
the major goal of improving performance in Particle Mesh Ewald molecular
dynamics simulations and minimizations. The code has been totally rewritten in
Fortran 90, and is capable of running in either an Amber 6 or Amber 7 mode.
Functionality is more complete in Amber 6 mode, with the Amber 7 mode designed
mostly to do the same sorts of things that Amber 6 does, but with output that
is comparable to Amber 7 Sander. The calculations done in PMEMD are intended
to replicate either Sander 6 or Sander 7 calculations within the limits of
roundoff errors. The calculations are just done more rapidly in less memory,
and runs may be made efficiently on significantly larger numbers of
processors.  Performance improvement ratios on Linux clusters and IBM SP3/4
clusters are typically in the range of 1.9 to 3.6 fold relative to Sander 6
and 1.5 to 3.8 fold relative to Sander 7.  Memory requirements are roughly cut
in half.  A large number of benchmarks are presented in the ReleaseNote file.

PMEMD was developed by Dr. Robert Duke in Prof. Lee Pedersen's Lab at
UNC-Chapel Hill, starting from the version of Sander in Amber 6.  Funding
support was provided by NIH grant HL-06350 (PPG) and NSF grant 2001-0759-02
(ITR/AP).  When citing PMEMD (Particle Mesh Ewald Molecular Dynamics) in the
literature, please use both the Amber Version 7 citation given in the Amber 7
manual, and the following citation:

Robert E. Duke and Lee G. Pedersen (2003) PMEMD 3, University of North
Carolina-Chapel Hill

PMEMD is available without charge to users who have an existing license for
Amber (version 6 or 7).  For more information, and to download the code,
please go to:

                http://amber.scripps.edu/pmemd-get.html


..Robert Duke (UNC-Chapel Hill) and David Case (The Scripps Research
Institute)




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jul  8 21:59:05 2003
Received: from web15213.mail.bjs.yahoo.com (web15213.mail.bjs.yahoo.com [202.3.77.143])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h691x3qe006902
	for <chemistry*at*ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 21:59:04 -0400
Message-ID: <20030709015902.98426.qmail*at*web15213.mail.bjs.yahoo.com>
Received: from [218.56.157.15] by web15213.mail.bjs.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 09:59:02 CST
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 09:59:02 +0800 (CST)
From: =?gb2312?q?Jinsong=20Zhao?= <zh_jinsong*at*yahoo.com.cn>
Subject: CCL: About the alignment of CoMFA
To: CCL <chemistry*at*ccl.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dear all,

I have a series of structure similar chemicals. After
I optimizate each compound with minimum energy, I
found the alignment was poor (all the compounds were
aligned to a maximum common structure).

I am wondering if it's reasonable that I just minimize
the subset of a chemical structure, i.e., I let the
conformation of the common structure unchanged.

I really appreciate any comments or suggestions!

Best regards,

Jinsong   

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? 
9zDZ5gSJSC;'74@,;x5w2i@-?*a!D;
http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/?http://cn.tech.yahoo.com/zhuanti/laji/index.html


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jul  8 12:02:26 2003
Received: from chem.udel.edu (chem.udel.edu [128.175.138.224])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h68G2Pqe029588
	for <chemistry<<at>>ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:02:25 -0400
Received: from localhost (pradyu@localhost)
	by chem.udel.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA535355
	for <chemistry<<at>>ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:45:00 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:45:00 -0400
From: "Pradyumna S. Singh" <pradyu<<at>>chem.udel.edu>
To: chemistry<<at>>ccl.net
Subject: DFT and Charged Species
In-Reply-To: <3F02ECDD.D642E01A<<at>>trentu.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.10.10307081242310.532260-100000<<at>>chem.udel.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hello,

I was wondering if anyone has published on the accuracy of DFT for
studying charged species like radical anions/cations or
dianions/dications ?

Any leads or references would be appreciated !

Thanks,
Pradyumna



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jul  9 06:37:47 2003
Received: from dove2.cf.ac.uk (dove2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.1.170])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h69Ablqe014112
	for <chemistry^at^ccl.net>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 06:37:47 -0400
Received: from thor.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.0.1])
	by dove2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 19aCKT-0000Fz-00; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 11:37:41 +0100
Received: from localhost (sacjap@localhost) by thor.cf.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA05913; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:37:41 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:37:40 +0100 (BST)
From: Jamie Platts <Platts^at^Cardiff.ac.uk>
X-X-Sender: sacjap@thor
To: chemistry^at^ccl.net, "" <help^at^gaussian.com>
cc: "Waller, Mark -- Mark Waller" <waller_m^at^chem.usyd.edu.au>,
   Mark Waller <WallerM^at^cf.ac.uk>
Subject: Error with ONIOM/AMBER in G03
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.50.0307091128140.7181-100000@thor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

  Hi there - I'm having trouble getting an ONIOM job on a platinum complex
to run in Gaussian03. Despite requesting AMBER for the outer region and
LanL2DZ for the metal core, the job crashes because there is no VSTO-3G
basis set for Pt (G98 just printed a warning and carried on).

  Does anyone know of a way to avoid this? More fundamentally, why does an
AMBER calculation require an STO-3G basis anyway?

  Many thanks in advance,

  Jamie


Error message from G03:

 ONIOM: restoring gridpoint  3 on chk file.
 ONIOM: generating point  3 -- low level on real system.
 Standard basis: VSTO-3G* (5D, 7F)
 IA out of range in STO.
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /usr/local/testsoft/g03/l301.exe

----------------------------------------------------------
  Jamie Platts
  Dept. of Chemistry  		Phone: +44 (0) 2920 874950
  Cardiff University 	 	Email: platts^at^cf.ac.uk
  P.O. Box 912 			FAX:   +44 (0) 2920 874030
  Cardiff CF10 3TB 		www.cf.ac.uk/chemy


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Mon Jul  7 03:11:10 2003
Received: from gems.uia.ac.be (hgems.uia.ac.be [143.169.254.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h677B9qe016681
	for <chemistry!at!ccl.net>; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 03:11:10 -0400
Received: from rnase (rnase.uia.ac.be [143.169.6.236])
	by gems.uia.ac.be (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h677B7im005989;
	Mon, 7 Jul 2003 09:11:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Ben Swerts <ben.swerts!at!ua.ac.be>
Organization: University of Antwerp
To: chemistry!at!ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Ewald in CHARMM
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 08:11:05 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
References: <482769665.1057357456126.JavaMail.root@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <482769665.1057357456126.JavaMail.root@localhost>
Cc: Niharendu.Choudhury!at!mail.uh.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200307070811.05870.ben.swerts!at!ua.ac.be>
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Status: Not checked, trusted sender
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.33 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h677BAqe016682

Hi Niharendu,

This message means CHARMM needs more memory and your architecture cannot 
provide more memory at runtime. You'll have to recompile CHARMM with a larger 
heap-size. Check out the file heap.fcm and change the parameter HEAPDM in the 
correct place for your architecture.


	Ben


On Saturday 05 July 2003 00:24, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was initially running with following crystal keywords:
>
>  Crystal Define Cubic 24.850 24.850 24.850  90.0 90.0 90.0
>  Crystal Build noperations 0
>
>  and energy keywords :
>
> ENERGY ATOM ELEC EWALD KAPPA 0.21  KMAX 4 KSQMAX 27 -
>            CUTNB 10.0  CUTIM 10.0 CTOFNB 9.5  VDW SHIFT
>
>  it was running fine.
>
>
>  Now I have changed the energy section to the following:
>
>  ENERGY ATOM ELEC EWALD KAPPA 0.21  KMAX 4 KSQMAX 27 -
>            CUTNB 12.0  CUTIM 12.0 CTOFNB 10  VDW SHIFT
>
>  and it is not running. (I have only changed cutnb and ctofnb, crystal
>  section being the same).
>
> FOR MORE DETAILS I am appending below the output error message:
[snip]
>
>       ***** LEVEL -4 WARNING FROM <VEHEAP> *****
>       ***** CANNOT EXPAND HEAP ON THIS MACHINE
>       ******************************************
>       BOMLEV (  0) IS REACHED - TERMINATING. WRNLEV IS  5
>  Execution terminated due to the detection of a fatal error.
>
[snip]




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Mon Jul  7 13:33:58 2003
Received: from web15206.mail.bjs.yahoo.com (web15206.mail.bjs.yahoo.com [202.3.77.136])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h67HXuqe004551
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 13:33:57 -0400
Message-ID: <20030707173355.24104.qmail.-at-.web15206.mail.bjs.yahoo.com>
Received: from [218.56.157.15] by web15206.mail.bjs.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 01:33:55 CST
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 01:33:55 +0800 (CST)
From: =?gb2312?q?Jinsong=20Zhao?= <zh_jinsong.-at-.yahoo.com.cn>
Subject: CCL: Outlier of CoMFA Analysis
To: CCL <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dear all,

I have met a question when I deal with the results of
CoMFA analysis (3D-QSAR). In my data set, when certain
compound was removed, the Q2 (r2 of LOO) was increased
significantly. However, I cann't find the significant
difference of structure between the removed compound
and the rest ones, e.g., 3-Cl-C6H4OP(=O)(OMe)2 v.s.
4-Cl-C6H4OP(=O)(OMe)2.

Therefore, I hope to get your knidly help. Anyone here
could give me some hints or methods that could help me
to figure out the outlier. Thanks in advance!

By the way, is it necessary to align all the remainder
molecules again after removing the outlier? It's
something time-consuming.

I really appreciate you for any comments, suggestions,
and helps. 

Best regards,

Jinsong

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? 
9zDZ5gSJSC;'74@,;x5w2i@-?*a!D;
http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/?http://cn.tech.yahoo.com/zhuanti/laji/index.html


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jul  8 15:21:49 2003
Received: from altair.fccc.edu (altair.fccc.edu [131.249.12.217])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h68JLnqe001207
	for <chemistry/at/ccl.net>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:21:49 -0400
Received: from fccc.edu by altair.fccc.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/27Feb01-0452PM)
	id PAA0000018035; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:21:36 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:23:16 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-46--71898244
Subject: SCWRL3.0 for protein side-chain prediction
From: "Roland L. Dunbrack" <RL_Dunbrack/at/fccc.edu>
To: chemistry/at/ccl.net
Message-Id: <A0296F80-B179-11D7-9E3C-000393762E88/at/fccc.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551)


--Apple-Mail-46--71898244
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	format=flowed

SCWRL3.0, a program for predicting protein side-chain conformations for 
a given backbone,
is now available. SCWRL3.0 uses a new algorithm based on graph theory 
that is much faster
than previous versions of SCWRL, and faster than any other available 
programs for protein
side-chain prediction.

Some highlights:

- very fast algorithm for side-chain prediction. A set of 180 test 
proteins comprising 34,342 side
chains takes 404 seconds.
- increased accuracy comparing to previous SCWRL versions with 82.6% 
correct chi1 and 73.7% correct chi1+2.
- preserving residue numbering and chain IDs. Many programs renumber 
residues from 1 to N and strip
chain IDs.
- sequence replacement for comparative modeling and protein design
- distributed as executable binaries for most popular operating systems 
(Linux, Windows, Mac OS X)
- easy installation procedure
- free academic/non-profit license
- paper to appear in Protein Science, Sept. 2003 (preprint available on 
request)

Visit http://dunbrack.fccc.edu/scwrl3 for more information and download 
options.

Sincerely yours,
Adrian Canutescu and Roland Dunbrack

* Roland L. Dunbrack, Jr., Ph. D.
* Member
* Institute for Cancer Research
* Fox Chase Cancer Center
* 333 Cottman Avenue
* Philadelphia PA 19111
* (215) 728-2434
* (215) 728-2412 (fax)
* RL_Dunbrack/at/fccc.edu
* http://dunbrack.fccc.edu (scientific research)
* http://dunbrack.org/ (genealogy)
--Apple-Mail-46--71898244
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=US-ASCII

SCWRL3.0, a program for predicting protein side-chain conformations
for a given backbone,

is now available. SCWRL3.0 uses a new algorithm based on graph theory
that is much faster

than previous versions of SCWRL, and faster than any other available
programs for protein

side-chain prediction.


Some highlights:


- very fast algorithm for side-chain prediction. A set of 180 test
proteins comprising 34,342 side

chains takes 404 seconds.

- increased accuracy comparing to previous SCWRL versions with 82.6%
correct chi1 and 73.7% correct chi1+2.

- preserving residue numbering and chain IDs. Many programs renumber
residues from 1 to N and strip

chain IDs.

- sequence replacement for comparative modeling and protein design

- distributed as executable binaries for most popular operating
systems (Linux, Windows, Mac OS X)

- easy installation procedure

- free academic/non-profit license

- paper to appear in Protein Science, Sept. 2003 (preprint available
on request)


Visit http://dunbrack.fccc.edu/scwrl3 for more information and
download options.


Sincerely yours,

Adrian Canutescu and Roland Dunbrack


* <bold>Roland L. Dunbrack, Jr., Ph. D.</bold>

* <italic>Member</italic>

* Institute for Cancer Research

* Fox Chase Cancer Center

* 333 Cottman Avenue

* Philadelphia PA 19111

* (215) 728-2434

* (215) 728-2412 (fax)

* RL_Dunbrack/at/fccc.edu

* <underline>http://dunbrack.fccc.edu </underline>(scientific research)

* <underline>http://dunbrack.org/ </underline>(genealogy)
--Apple-Mail-46--71898244--



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jul  9 17:13:05 2003
Received: from antigen.scripps.edu (relay2.scripps.edu [137.131.200.30])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h69LD4qe031374
	for <chemistry:at:ccl.net>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:13:04 -0400
Received: from relay2.scripps.edu(137.131.200.30) by antigen.scripps.edu via csmap 
	 id 12051; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 14:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from antigen.scripps.edu (renoir [137.131.252.25])
	by relay2.scripps.edu (8.11.7/TSRI-4.4.1r) with SMTP id h69LD4801576;
	Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from renoir.scripps.edu(137.131.252.25) by antigen.scripps.edu via csmap 
	 id 12047; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 14:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by renoir.scripps.edu (Postfix, from userid 1376)
	id EA279F6B; Wed,  9 Jul 2003 14:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by renoir.scripps.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DA46BA25; Wed,  9 Jul 2003 14:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Crowley <crowley:at:scripps.edu>
To: Ben Swerts <ben.swerts:at:ua.ac.be>
Cc: chemistry:at:ccl.net, <Niharendu.Choudhury:at:mail.uh.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Ewald in CHARMM
In-Reply-To: <200307070811.05870.ben.swerts:at:ua.ac.be>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307091407190.28868-100000:at:renoir.scripps.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Concerning the heap expand error message:

You have increased the cutoff so most likely the message is
not coming from ewald, but from the nonbond list generator.
The list will be considerably bigger, and it is in HEAP memory.
Normally, the heap will be reallocated during the run (on most
machines) to accomodate the need.

Your message says that heap cannot be increased on the machine.
It is either because it cannot reallocate (there is no viable
memalloc function) or that there is not enough memory on your
machine to accomodate the need.

Recompiling with a larger heap will help the first cause.
The second cause will not be helped by recompiling.

What architecture are you running on?
Mike

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Physical mail:   Dr. Michael F. Crowley
                 Department of Molecular Biology, TPC6
                 The Scripps Research Institute
                 10550 North Torrey Pines Road
                 La Jolla, California 92037

Electronic mail: crowley:at:scripps.edu
Telephone:         858/784-9290
Fax:               858/784-8688
-----------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Ben Swerts wrote:

> Hi Niharendu,
>
> This message means CHARMM needs more memory and your architecture cannot
> provide more memory at runtime. You'll have to recompile CHARMM with a larger
> heap-size. Check out the file heap.fcm and change the parameter HEAPDM in the
> correct place for your architecture.
>
>
> 	Ben
>
>
> On Saturday 05 July 2003 00:24, you wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I was initially running with following crystal keywords:
> >
> >  Crystal Define Cubic 24.850 24.850 24.850  90.0 90.0 90.0
> >  Crystal Build noperations 0
> >
> >  and energy keywords :
> >
> > ENERGY ATOM ELEC EWALD KAPPA 0.21  KMAX 4 KSQMAX 27 -
> >            CUTNB 10.0  CUTIM 10.0 CTOFNB 9.5  VDW SHIFT
> >
> >  it was running fine.
> >
> >
> >  Now I have changed the energy section to the following:
> >
> >  ENERGY ATOM ELEC EWALD KAPPA 0.21  KMAX 4 KSQMAX 27 -
> >            CUTNB 12.0  CUTIM 12.0 CTOFNB 10  VDW SHIFT
> >
> >  and it is not running. (I have only changed cutnb and ctofnb, crystal
> >  section being the same).
> >
> > FOR MORE DETAILS I am appending below the output error message:
> [snip]
> >
> >       ***** LEVEL -4 WARNING FROM <VEHEAP> *****
> >       ***** CANNOT EXPAND HEAP ON THIS MACHINE
> >       ******************************************
> >       BOMLEV (  0) IS REACHED - TERMINATING. WRNLEV IS  5
> >  Execution terminated due to the detection of a fatal error.
> >
> [snip]
>
>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
> and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY:at:ccl.net
>
> Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST:at:ccl.net
> HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
>
> If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
> Jan Labanowski,  jkl:at:ccl.net (read about it on CCL Home Page)
> -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




