From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Dec 10 10:46:57 2003
Received: from hellmouth4.gatech.edu (hellmouth4.gatech.edu [130.207.165.164])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBAFkQJO001554
	for <chemistry!at!ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:46:26 -0500
Received: from hellmouth4.gatech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hellmouth4.gatech.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id C24A0A85E
	for <chemistry!at!ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:45:39 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from ok16!at!mail.gatech.edu)
Received: from acmey.gatech.edu (acmey.prism.gatech.edu [130.207.171.27])
	by hellmouth4.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E83A847
	for <chemistry!at!ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:45:39 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from ok16!at!mail.gatech.edu)
Received: by acmey.gatech.edu (Postfix, from userid 11564)
	id 218DC31F25; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:45:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by acmey.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F243E330FB
	for <chemistry!at!ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:45:38 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from ok16!at!mail.gatech.edu)
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:45:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Ohyun Kwon <ok16!at!mail.gatech.edu>
X-X-Sender:  <ok16!at!acmey.gatech.edu>
Reply-To: Tommy Ohyun Kwon <ohyun.kwon!at!chemistry.gatech.edu>
To: <chemistry!at!ccl.net>
Subject: 5d and 6d functions in basis set
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.33.0312101038430.17274-100000!at!acmey.gatech.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=7.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Dear CCLers;
According to Gaussian and other program manuals, some basis sets employ
6d, and others do 5d. For example, 6-31G* basis set use 6d (Cartesian d
function) but 6-311G* basis set use 5d (pure d function). And in
GaussianXX program, when the keyword of "Gen" is applied, using 5d is default.
Is any particular reason for that?
I would appreciate it if anyone could kindly give some advice on this maater.
Thank you very much for your attention.

Best wishes,

Tommy Ohyun Kwon, Ph.D
School of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta Georgia, 30332
Email: ohyun.kwon!at!chemistry.gatech.edu



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Dec  9 12:01:36 2003
Received: from rama.ks.uiuc.edu (rama.ks.uiuc.edu [130.126.120.150])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB9H14JO003216
	for <chemistry=at=ccl.net>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:01:04 -0500
Received: from moline.ks.uiuc.edu (moline.ks.uiuc.edu [130.126.120.60])
	by rama.ks.uiuc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB9H13u5016981;
	Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:01:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from johns@localhost)
	by moline.ks.uiuc.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.1) id hB9H13A08328;
	Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:01:03 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:01:02 -0600
From: John Stone <johns=at=ks.uiuc.edu>
To: chemistry=at=ccl.net
Subject: VMD 1.8.2 is available
Message-ID: <20031209110102.C8172=at=moline.ks.uiuc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=7.0
	tests=USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Dear CCL,
  We've released a new version of VMD, a free OpenGL-based molecular
visualization tool for MacOS X, Unix, and Windows:
  http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/vmd-1.8.2/  

The release notes for the new version are available here:
  http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/vmd-1.8.2/README.html

Thanks for your time,
  John Stone
  vmd=at=ks.uiuc.edu

-- 
NIH Resource for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics
Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology
University of Illinois, 405 N. Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801
Email: johns=at=ks.uiuc.edu                 Phone: 217-244-3349              
  WWW: http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~johns/      Fax: 217-244-6078


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Dec  9 06:10:02 2003
Received: from web1.ulb.ac.be (resulb.ulb.ac.be [164.15.59.200])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB9B9UJO023715
	for <chemistry(at)ccl.net>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:09:31 -0500
Received: from wwwdev.ulb.ac.be (resu1 [164.15.59.200]) by web1.ulb.ac.be (8.8.8/3.17.1.ap (resu))
        id MAA14265; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:09:28 +0100 (MET) for chemistry(at)ccl.net
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:09:28 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <200312091109.MAA14265(at)web1.ulb.ac.be>
From: Giju Kalathingal <gkalathi(at)vub.ac.be>
To: chemistry(at)ccl.net
Subject: Calculations without  Born-Oppenheimer approximation
X-Mailer: Webmail ULB v2.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0
	tests=none
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Dear CCL-all,

Could you please give me some info on programs
that let me to do quantum chemical calculations
(geometry optimzations and vibrational frequencies) 
without Born-Oppenheimer approximation?

Thanks in advance.

With best wishes,

Giju Kalathingal

Department of General Chemistry (ALGC)    
Vrije Universiteit Brussel          
Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium. 
Tel.:++32-2-629-3315 Fax: ++32-2-629-3317
E-mail: Giju.Kalathingal(at)vub.ac.be
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
 
 
 



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Dec  9 07:16:36 2003
Received: from guppy.vub.ac.be (www.vub.ac.be [134.184.129.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB9CG3JO025947
	for <chemistry(at)ccl.net>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 07:16:04 -0500
Received: from mach.vub.ac.be (mach.vub.ac.be [134.184.129.3]) by guppy.vub.ac.be (8.9.1b+Sun/3.17.1.ap (guppy))
        id NAA26766; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:16:03 +0100 (MET) for <chemistry(at)ccl.net>
Received: from ulb.ac.be (chimorg-pc5.ulb.ac.be [164.15.61.104]) by mach.vub.ac.be (8.9.3/3.13.5.aejp (mach))
        id NAA08425; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:16:02 +0100 (MET) for <chemistry(at)ccl.net>
Message-ID: <3FD5DEC4.3080105(at)ulb.ac.be>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:40:04 +0100
From: Christophe Biot <cbiot(at)ulb.ac.be>
Organization: ULB
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011126 Netscape6/6.2.1
X-Accept-Language: fr, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Liste CCL <chemistry(at)ccl.net>
Subject: LUMO HF level
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=7.0
	tests=USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

  Dear all,

I'd like to perform computationial estimations of the energy levels for 
the frontier orbitals (HOMO, LUMO).

What is the accuracy of performing such calculations at the HF level??
More precisely, are the LUMO orbitals correctly described at this level 
of calculation?

Best regards.

C Biot







From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Dec  9 06:35:30 2003
Received: from outbound.kcl.ac.uk (elder.kcl.ac.uk [137.73.2.27])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB9BYtJO024615
	for <chemistry*at*ccl.net>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:34:58 -0500
Received: from outbound.kcl.ac.uk ([137.73.2.214] helo=elder)
        by outbound.kcl.ac.uk outbound-standard with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
        id 1ATg8l-0001Pv-AT
        for chemistry*at*ccl.net; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:34:55 +0000
Received: from fwb249-41.paws.kcl.ac.uk ([137.73.202.101] helo=fwb249-00.paws.kcl.ac.uk)
        by elder ib2-received with esmtp 
        id 1ATg8M-0000lO-Hb
        for chemistry*at*ccl.net; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:34:30 +0000
From: Nikeel Patel <nikeel.patel*at*kcl.ac.uk>
Sender: nikeel.patel*at*kcl.ac.uk
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:34:30 +0000
To: chemistry*at*ccl.net
Subject: Code for chirality
Message-ID: <EXECMAIL.1031209113430.A*at*fwb249-00.kcl.ac.uk>
Priority: NORMAL
X-Mailer: Execmail for Win32 5.1 Build (9) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-KCLSpamScore: -49
X-KCLRealSpamScore: -4.9
X-KCLSpamReport: BAYES_00=-4.9
X-KCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0
	tests=none
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Hello

I am a 4th year pharmacy student at King's College London.

I am currently undertaking a project which looks at the reactivity 
between enantiomers in their solid state using computer simulations.

I was wondering if anyone knows where I could obtain a computer code 
for determining the chirality of an atom.

Any help with this request would be greatly appreciated and 
acknowledged as such.

Thanking you in advance.

----------------------
Nikeel Patel
nikeel.patel*at*kcl.ac.uk




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Dec  9 09:23:22 2003
Received: from bute.st-andrews.ac.uk (bute.st-and.ac.uk [138.251.12.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB9EMoJO029451
	for <chemistry*at*ccl.net>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:22:51 -0500
Received: from Babydesign.st-andrews.ac.uk (bmspc-glt2-18 [138.251.94.166])
	by bute.st-andrews.ac.uk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA16603
	for <chemistry*at*ccl.net>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 14:17:23 GMT
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20031209141952.01f26098*at*bute.st-andrews.ac.uk>
X-Sender: im17*at*bute.st-andrews.ac.uk
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:22:47 +0000
To: chemistry*at*ccl.net
From: "Ibrahim M.Moustafa" <im17*at*st-andrews.ac.uk>
Subject: Carbohydrate stereochemistry
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=7.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Dear CCl users,

    Could someone help me and explain what is meant by the following terms 
used in the description of the stereochemistry of carbohydrates: gg, tg, 
gt, anti, syn.

   I'd really be grateful for your help.

   regards,
  Ibrahim

Ibrahim M.Moustafa
Centre for Biomolecular Sciences
St-Andrews University
North Haugh, St-Andrews
Fife KY16 9ST
Scotland, U.K.

Tel.       +44 (0)1334 467257
Fax       +44 (0)1334 462595
e-mail:   im17*at*st-andrews.ac.uk 



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Dec 10 12:07:07 2003
Received: from kafka.net.nih.gov (kafka.net.nih.gov [165.112.130.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBAH6ZJO005361
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:06:35 -0500
Received: from pollux.cber.nih.gov (pollux.cber.nih.gov [128.231.52.5])
	by kafka.net.nih.gov (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBAH6YcD001258;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:06:35 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:59:37 -0500
From: Rick Venable <rvenable~at~pollux.cber.nih.gov>
To: "Ibrahim M.Moustafa" <im17~at~st-andrews.ac.uk>
cc: chemistry~at~ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Carbohydrate stereochemistry
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20031209141952.01f26098~at~bute.st-andrews.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.51.0312101149150.8450~at~pollux.cber.nih.gov>
References: <6.0.0.22.0.20031209141952.01f26098~at~bute.st-andrews.ac.uk>
ReplyTo: Rick_Venable~at~nih.gov
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      RCVD_IN_NJABL,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_PINE,
	      X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Ibrahim M.Moustafa wrote:
>     Could someone help me and explain what is meant by the following
> terms used in the description of the stereochemistry of carbohydrates:
> gg, tg, gt, anti, syn.
>
>    I'd really be grateful for your help.
>
> Ibrahim M.Moustafa
> Centre for Biomolecular Sciences
> St-Andrews University
> North Haugh, St-Andrews
> Fife KY16 9ST
> Scotland, U.K.

They aren't really sterechemistry terms, but configurational descriptors
of the 2 torsions between 2 sugar rings in a typical di- or
poly-saccharide.  The gg, tg, gt etc. terms are simple shorthand for
trans (180 deg) and gauche (+/- 60 deg); you have to very careful about
stating which 4 atoms define the torsion, as there are multiple choices.

The syn and anti terms refer more explicitly to the conformation wrt. to
the aliphatic protons at either end of the linkage, e.g. H1 and H4' for
a typcial 1,4 linkage.  If the the protons are on the same side of the
linkage, i.e. the C-H bonds point in roughly parallel directions, they
are 'syn'.


=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Rick Venable           29/500
FDA/CBER/OVRR Biophysics Lab
1401 Rockville Pike    HFM-419
Rockville, MD  20852-1448  U.S.A.
(301) 496-1905   Rick_Venable~at~nih.gov
ALT email:  rvenable~at~speakeasy.org
-------------------------------------
"Don't blame me, I voted for Kang."
                         Homer
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=

From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Dec 10 12:36:11 2003
Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBAHZeJO006496
	for <CHEMISTRY:at:ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:35:40 -0500
Received: from webmail.rpi.edu (webmail.rpi.edu [128.113.26.21])
	by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBAHZdto024445
	for <CHEMISTRY:at:ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:35:39 -0500
Message-Id: <200312101735.hBAHZdto024445:at:smtp4.server.rpi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
To: CHEMISTRY:at:ccl.net
From: "Dr. N. SUKUMAR" <nagams:at:rpi.edu>
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
X-Originating-Ip: 128.113.135.209
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: "Dr. N. SUKUMAR" <nagams:at:rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:35:39 EST
X-Mailer: EMUmail 4.00
Subject: Re: CCL:Molecular Complexes
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:33:16 +0100 Anton Feenstra wrote:

> Tarek M. El-Gogary wrote:
> 
> > I am looking for an accurate definition for the term, Molecular
> Complexes. 
> [...]
> 
> This would, I'm afraid, be somewhat context dependent. There is a wide,
> and
> fairly continues scale of complexes, both terms of affinity (i.e.
> strength
> of binding of the partners in the comples) and in lifetime (i.e.
> persistence
> times of the binding). In other words, it would depend on the time-window

> you are interested in, and on the relative affinity with respect to other

> processes/binding partners/etc. in your sysem of interest.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Groetjes,
> 
> Anton


Good point. I am reminded of something one of my physics teachers once
said: "From the point of view of a physicist, a molecule is just a
collision that takes too long."

Sukumar




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Dec 10 11:27:58 2003
Received: from bmbpcu21.leeds.ac.uk (bmbpcu21.leeds.ac.uk [129.11.110.201])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBAGRQJO003341
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:27:27 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
	by bmbpcu21.leeds.ac.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id hBAGOVj10289
	for chemistry_at_ccl.net; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:24:31 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
From: Peter Oledzki <peter_at_bioinformatics.leeds.ac.uk>
Reply-To: peter_at_bioinformatics.leeds.ac.uk
To: chemistry_at_ccl.net
Subject: Chemistry Resources for Ligands?
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:24:31 +0000
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <03121016243100.10214@bmbpcu21>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0
	tests=none
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)


Hello CCLers,

I was wondering if anybody knew of any resources which could help me in 
identifying ligand chemotypes. I'm using a docking method that converts 
functional groups/ligand atoms into certain types of empirical probes. Seeing 
that I'm from a molecular biology/genetics background my medicinal chemistry 
is too bad to talk about. Does anybody know of any websites that show the 
major types of functional groups with the chemical structures of known 
ligands. Anything along these lines will be very helpful.

Cheers 

Pete 

-- 
***********************************************************
Peter Oledzki
PhD Bioinformatics Research Student
School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
University of Leeds
LS2 9JT
0113 34334447 


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Dec 10 12:28:22 2003
Received: from bohr.quimica.ufpr.br ([200.17.215.64])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBAHRoJO006229
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:27:51 -0500
Received: from laplace.quimica.ufpr.br ([200.17.215.88] helo=quimica.ufpr.br)
	by bohr.quimica.ufpr.br with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AU87n-00038R-00
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:27:47 -0200
Message-ID: <3FD75792.4070601_at_quimica.ufpr.br>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:27:46 -0200
From: Eduardo <edulsa_at_quimica.ufpr.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031105
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry_at_ccl.net
Subject: anti-ferromagnectic
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=7.0
	tests=USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Sirs and Madams

     I am studying  complex compounds (built with Fe centers) that show 
anti-ferromagenectic behaviour. Could you, please, point to me any 
software that can handle these compounds or which is the best approach 
for this study.

     Thanks a lot in advance


     yours


     Eduardo

-- 
Eduardo Lemos de Sa - edulsa_at_quimica.ufpr.br
Dep. Quimica - Universidade Federal do Parana
Curitiba - PR - Brazil
Box: 19081 - Zip: 81531-990 - Phone: +55(41)361-3300



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Dec 10 12:11:44 2003
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBAHBDJO005532
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:11:13 -0500
Received: from YOURBD32B012D4 (pcp02630529pcs.univde01.de.comcast.net[68.82.79.253])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP
          id <20031210171112014008ks66e>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:11:12 +0000
Message-ID: <01a301c3bf40$9fc44c80$6400a8c0@YOURBD32B012D4>
From: "Matthew Schlecht" <schlecht_at_delanet.com>
To: <chemistry_at_ccl.net>
References: <6.0.0.22.0.20031209141952.01f26098_at_bute.st-andrews.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: CCL:Carbohydrate stereochemistry
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:11:16 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=7.0
	tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

     In carbohydrate nomenclature:

gg - gauche, gauche
tg - trans, gauche
gt - gauche, trans

     Definitions for these, as well as for the terms anti and syn, can be
found at the excellent IUPAC stereochemical nomenclature site, the index for
which can be found at:

http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iupac/stereo/cont.html

     Basically these are descriptors for the relative stereochemistry in
polycyclic compounds, such as oligo- and polysaccharides.

HTH, Matthew Schlecht
*********************************************************
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ibrahim M.Moustafa" <im17_at_st-andrews.ac.uk>
To: <chemistry_at_ccl.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:22 AM
Subject: CCL:Carbohydrate stereochemistry


> Dear CCl users,
>
>     Could someone help me and explain what is meant by the following terms
> used in the description of the stereochemistry of carbohydrates: gg, tg,
> gt, anti, syn.
>
>    I'd really be grateful for your help.
>
>    regards,
>   Ibrahim
>
> Ibrahim M.Moustafa
> Centre for Biomolecular Sciences
> St-Andrews University
> North Haugh, St-Andrews
> Fife KY16 9ST
> Scotland, U.K.
>
> Tel.       +44 (0)1334 467257
> Fax       +44 (0)1334 462595
> e-mail:   im17_at_st-andrews.ac.uk
>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
> To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject:
line
> and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY_at_ccl.net
>
> Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to:
CHEMISTRY-REQUEST_at_ccl.net
> HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
>
> If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
> Jan Labanowski,  jkl_at_ccl.net (read about it on CCL Home Page)
> -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Dec 10 12:53:03 2003
Received: from crunch.qtp.ufl.edu (crunch.qtp.ufl.edu [128.227.192.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBAHqWJO007259
	for <CHEMISTRY_at_ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:52:32 -0500
Received: from pc1 (dred1 [192.168.4.129])
	by crunch.qtp.ufl.edu (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Server/deumens) with SMTP id hBAHqU6N024912;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:52:30 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <018801c3bf48$2a8f97f0$8104a8c0_at_qtp.ufl.edu>
From: "Stefan Fau" <fau_at_qtp.ufl.edu>
To: "Ohyun Kwon" <ok16_at_mail.gatech.edu>
Cc: "CCL - all" <CHEMISTRY_at_ccl.net>
References: <Pine.SOL.4.33.0312101038430.17274-100000_at_acmey.gatech.edu>
Subject: CCL: Re: 5d and 6d functions in basis set
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:05:16 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=7.0
	tests=REFERENCES
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Hi Ohyun,

my speculation on this is as follows:
cartesian d-functions are linear combinations of the five
"pure" d-functions and an s-function of the same exponent.
Therefore, using cartesian d-functions introduces an
additional s-function into the basis set. This may lead to
near linear dependence problems in larger basis sets.
Since many smaller basis sets are part of Gaussians basis
set library, it is probably more likely that the GEN keyword
is used to specify large basis sets. Hence the 5D default.

Stefan
______________________________________________________________________
Dr. Stefan Fau                    |      fau_at_qtp.ufl.edu
University of Florida             |     (352) 392-6714
Quantum Theory Project
2319 NPB #92, P.O.Box 118435
Gainesville, FL 32611-8435


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Dec 10 13:49:28 2003
Received: from freyr.chem.washington.edu (freyr.chem.washington.edu [128.95.128.138])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBAImvJO028559
	for <CHEMISTRY$at$ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:48:57 -0500
Received: from freyr.chem.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freyr.chem.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBAIm21c020144
	for <CHEMISTRY$at$ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:48:02 -0800
Received: from localhost (fer@localhost)
	by freyr.chem.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id hBAIm2uF020140
	for <CHEMISTRY$at$ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:48:02 -0800
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:48:01 -0800 (PST)
From: "Fernando D. Vila" <fer$at$freyr.chem.washington.edu>
To: Computational Chemistry List <CHEMISTRY$at$ccl.net>
Subject: Simple implementation of DFT
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312101042510.19734-100000$at$freyr.chem.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0
	tests=USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Hi..

  I was wondering if anybody knows of a simple implementation of DFT. For 
example, a simple program that does LDA in atomic systems and would be 
useful to test some simple ideas. It could be in any language, I'm not 
very picky, but should fairly well commented to make changes easier.

Cheers and thanks in advance, Fer.

*******************************************************************************
Fernando D. Vila                Voice    (206)616-3207
Department of Chemistry         Fax      (206)685-8665
University of Washington        E-mail   fdv$at$u.washington.edu
Seattle, WA 98195, USA          WWW      http://faculty.washington.edu/fdv
*******************************************************************************



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Dec 10 16:46:58 2003
Received: from f04n01.cac.psu.edu (f04s01.cac.psu.edu [128.118.141.31])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBALkR8a031737
	for <chemistry^at^ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:46:27 -0500
Received: from ra.chem.psu.edu (ra.chem.psu.edu [128.118.199.40])
	by f04n01.cac.psu.edu (8.9.3p2.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA79016
	for <chemistry^at^ccl.net>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:46:26 -0500
Subject: problem calculating Fukui indices with Mopac
From: Rajarshi Guha <rxg218^at^psu.edu>
Reply-To: rxg218^at^psu.edu
To: chemistry^at^ccl.net
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1071092914.2714.5.camel^at^ra.chem.psu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) 
Date: 10 Dec 2003 16:48:34 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=7.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Hello,
  I'm trying to calculate condensed Fukui indices. I am using Mopac 7.01
and I am doing the calculations with the PM3 hamiltonian.

My problem occurs when I try and calculate mulliken charges for the
molecule with N+1 and N-1 electrons (where N is the number of electrons
in the neutral molecules).

For the N+1 case my keyword line is 

PM3 doublet charge=1 mullik

However though the calculation for the neutral molecule takes less than
a minute for the above case the calculation does not end after 5
minutes. Is this to be expected or am I doing something wrong?

I tried adding mmok and geo-ok since the structures are already geometry
optimized but that does'nt help. Is it correct to be using a PM3
hamiltonian for such systems?

Any pointers would be appreciated.
Thanks,

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajarshi Guha <rxg218^at^psu.edu> <http://jijo.cjb.net>
GPG Fingerprint: 0CCA 8EE2 2EEB 25E2 AB04 06F7 1BB9 E634 9B87 56EE
-------------------------------------------------------------------
How I wish I were what I was when I wished I were what I am.



