From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jan 20 10:41:28 2004
Received: from smtp.dmbr.UGent.be (dmbr242.fvms.ugent.be [157.193.189.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0KFfRc1022494
	for <chemistry!at!ccl.net>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:41:28 -0500
Received: from dmbr032.fvms.ugent.be (dmbr032.fvms.ugent.be [157.193.200.89])
	by smtp.dmbr.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1FF80010
	for <chemistry!at!ccl.net>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:42:25 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Energetical evaluation of protein-protein interactions
From: Dominique Vlieghe <Dominique.Vlieghe!at!dmbr.UGent.be>
To: forum CCL <chemistry!at!ccl.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1074613380.21437.4.camel!at!dmbr032.fvms.ugent.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 
Date: 20 Jan 2004 16:43:00 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi all,

Does anyone know of a good protocol for evaluating the energetics of
protein-protein interactions? More precisely, I would like to evaluate
the individual residue-residue contributions in complex stabilisation.

Also, does anyone have experience in doing this using CHARMM?

Regards (and a late happy new year :-0 )

Dominique


-- 
------------------------------
Dominique Vlieghe, Ph.D.,
Bioinformatics Core,
Department for Molecular Biomedical Research (DMBR)
VIB - Ghent University
(new) 'Fiers-Schell-Van Montagu' building
(new) Technologiepark 927
(new) B-9052 Ghent (Zwijnaarde), Belgium

(new) Tel : +32-(0)9-33-13.693
(new) Fax : +32-(0)9-33-13.609
(new) email:dominique.vlieghe!at!dmbr.ugent.be
(new) www:http://www.dmbr.ugent.be/
------------------------------



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jan 20 03:57:42 2004
Received: from mail1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE (mail1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.100.208])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0K8vfc1003842
	for <chemistry..at..ccl.net>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 03:57:41 -0500
Received: from uni-koeln.de (relax.cubic.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.151.118])
	by mail1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0K8wcqR027631
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT);
	Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:58:41 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <400CEDBE.9010404..at..uni-koeln.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:58:38 +0100
From: Christoph Steinbeck <c.steinbeck..at..uni-koeln.de>
Reply-To: c.steinbeck..at..uni-koeln.de
Organization: Cologne University Bioinformatics Center
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joel.Freyss..at..Actelion.Com
CC: chemistry..at..ccl.net, raj kumar <vrs_rajkumarbapu..at..yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: CCL:MM2 ForceField in Java
References: <OF9F63AE4D.C6997BAB-ONC1256E20.0051110E-C1256E20.00524793..at..Actelion.Com>
In-Reply-To: <OF9F63AE4D.C6997BAB-ONC1256E20.0051110E-C1256E20.00524793..at..Actelion.Com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new

Joel, we are doing exactly the same at the moment, as part of our 
student education.
Unfortunately, we are at the same point like you, so it seems we 
duplicated some work.
Our MM2 implementation is based on the MM2 parameter set from the Tinker 
package. I would be delighted to exchange some thoughts or the source 
code. My group, embedded in an international team of developers, 
maintains and develops the Chemistry Development Kit (CDK) [1], 
http://cdk.sourceforge.net. This new MM2 implementation will be part of 
CDK very soon.

Cheers,

Chris

[1] Steinbeck, C.; Han, Y. Q.; Kuhn, S.; Horlacher, O.; Luttmann, E.; 
Willighagen, E. The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An open-source Java 
library for chemo- and bioinformatics. Journal of Chemical Information 
and Computer Sciences 2003, 43, 493-500.

-- 
Dr. rer. nat. habil. Christoph Steinbeck (c.steinbeck..at..uni-koeln.de)
Groupleader Junior Research Group for Applied Bioinformatics
Cologne University BioInformatics Center (http://www.cubic.uni-koeln.de)
Z|lpicher Str. 47, 50674 Cologne
Tel: +49(0)221-470-7426   Fax: +49 (0) 221-470-7786

What is man but that lofty spirit - that sense of enterprise.
... Kirk, "I, Mudd," stardate 4513.3..

Joel.Freyss..at..Actelion.Com wrote:

 > Hello,
 >
 > I am trying to implement a MM2 forcefield in Java.
 > I found Tinker to be a great help for that work but I wondered if anybody
 > ever tried to develop something like that in Java and has some hints or
 > resources to help me? I need to find a position close to a global minimum
 > in a very short amount of time and the forcefield needs to be reliable.
 >
 > Right now, I implemented the bond stretching, angle bending, torsion and
 > VDW parameters and I get approximative results in about 2s: CH bonds 
with a
 > length of 1.05 A, using the simulated annealing and then the steepest
 > descent algorithm.
 >
 > Any advise?
 > Thanks
 >
 > Joel


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jan 20 16:19:31 2004
Received: from smtp4.es.uci.edu (smtp4.es.uci.edu [128.200.80.7])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0KLJRc1002500
	for <chemistry<<at>>ccl.net>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:19:31 -0500
Received: from 128.195.173.206 (dhcp-173206.mobile.uci.edu [128.195.173.206])
	by smtp4.es.uci.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0KLKHqO026448
	for <chemistry<<at>>ccl.net>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:20:22 -0800
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:20:17 -0800
From: John Lee <g03<<at>>joyie.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r)
Reply-To: John Lee <g03<<at>>joyie.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1465005816.20040120132017<<at>>joyie.com>
To: chemistry<<at>>ccl.net
Subject: The difference between partial optimization(Z-matrix) and freeze the coordinates(modredundant)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NACS_ES-MailScanner: No viruses found

Dear CCLers,

In the partial optimization, we can use Z-matrix and specify Variables
and Constants to do partially optimization. There is also another way
to do this kind of "partial optimization" which is to use modredundant
to freeze the position of an atom, bond, angle and dihedral angle.
Except fixing the position of an atom, it seems I can perform partial
optimization with Z-matrix for bond, angle and dihedral angle instead of using
modredundant to freeze them. So I wander what is the differences
between them.
  

-- 
Best regards,
 John                          



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jan 20 18:31:16 2004
Received: from genscript.com ([209.19.21.18])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id i0KNVEc1008551
	for <chemistry(at)ccl.net>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:31:15 -0500
Message-Id: <200401202331.i0KNVEc1008551(at)server.ccl.net>
Received: (qmail 27391 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2004 02:18:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (192.168.1.103)
  by 0 with SMTP; 21 Jan 2004 02:18:18 -0000
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:18 -0800
Subject: Boost Protein Expression by Codon Optimization
To: chemistry(at)ccl.net
From: Sally Wang<service(at)genscript.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id i0KNVGc1008565

Dear Colleague,

Happy New Year!

As we know, codon preference among different species could be dramatically different.  To enhance the expression level of a foreign protein in a particular expression system (E.coli, Yeast, Insect, or Mammalian cell), it is very important to adjust the codon frequency of the foreign protein to match that of the host expression system.  One classic example is GFP (green fluorescent protein) which was optimized to achieve high-level of expression in mammalian cells. 

GenScript has developed a proprietary algorithm for codon optimization.  This algorithm can optimize sequences for protein expression using either your own codon usage table or those from publicly available codon usage database.  It can converts your amino acid sequence into a DNA sequence with overall codon usage similar to a specified organism, and also optimizes the RNA secondary structure, GC content, repetitive codons etc. Using Genscript optimized synthetic genes, many of our customers have reported dramatic increase on protein expression. 

The optimized gene can be synthesized by GenScript gene synthesis technology with 100% fidelity.  The cost is as low as $2.35 per base pair.  Our service is very flexible, we can clone the optimized gene into our standard vectors (without extra charge), or any expression vector that you provide (for $400 extra charge).

Gene synthesis is a powerful technology and it has many other applications.  Another application example is to replace PCR Cloning.  Please visit our web (http://www.genscript.com/gene_synthesis.html) to learn more about this technology.  

Besides Gene Synthesis, we also provide custom vector-based siRNA, siRNA cassette, peptide, oligo, cloning and protein expression, biochemical reagents, and labwares.  Please visit our web site (http://www.genscript.com) to learn more about our services.


Sincerely,
 
Sally Wang
Account Manager
GenScript Corporation
120 Centennial Ave.
Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
Tel: 1-732-885-9188, 1-732-357-3839
Fax: 1-732-210-0262
Email: sallyw(at)genscript.com
Web: http://www.genscript.com


==============================================

P.S.   If you prefer not to receive GenScript News and Offers in email, please follow this link:
https://www.genscript.com/ssl-bin/uns_email?number=4MW876M4526X64M22M42&email=chemistry(at)ccl.net, and we apologize




