From chemistry-request@ccl.net Fri Apr 23 17:19:04 2004
Received: from scn4.scn.org (scn4.scn.org [66.212.64.197])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3NMJ2KC004461
	for <chemistry)at(ccl.net>; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:19:03 -0500
Received: from scn.org (er-chan@scn [66.212.64.194])
	by scn4.scn.org (8.9.1-20031009/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA18555;
	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (er-chan@localhost)
	by scn.org (8.9.1-20031009/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA23600;
	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: er-chan <er-chan)at(scn.org>
To: Masakatsu Ito <m-ito)at(jp.fujitsu.com>
cc: chemistry)at(ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Jarzynski's equality for free energy
In-Reply-To: <20040422.141916.468716365.Masakatsu Ito)at(ccg.flab.fujitsu.co.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.20.0404231517490.2412-100000)at(scn.scn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

Hello Computational Chemistry List  (On 04/22/04,2:19pm,you wrote Re:...

arXiv:cond-mat/0404475


MI> Hi CCLers,
MI> 
MI> I am looking for reviews and articles about the free energy
MI> calculation of biomolecules. I have been impressed by Jarzynski's
MI> equality (Phys.Rev.Lett. 78, 2690 (1997)) which enables one to
MI> estimate free energy difference from an ensemble of short MD
MI> simulations. This implies that the estimation can be drastically
MI> accelerated by distributed computing.  But those MD simulations should
MI> start from equilibrium, and I am wondering how such initial conditions
MI> can be prepared for biomolecules. Because it is notoriously difficult
MI> to get an equilibrium ensemble of biomolecular structures.
MI> 
MI> Thus I am very interested in the application of Jarzynski's equality
MI> to biomolecular processes. Could someone please give me some advice or
MI> point me to articles?
MI> 
MI> Thanks in advance for any help.  
MI> Kind Regards,
MI> 
MI> Masakatsu Ito , Ph.D
MI> 
MI> Nanotechnology Research Center
MI> FUJITSU LABORATORIES LTD.
MI> 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-0197 Japan
MI> Phone : +81-46-250-8234  Fax : +81-46-250-8844
MI> E-mail m-ito)at(jp.fujitsu.com
MI> 
MI> 
MI> -= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
MI> To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
MI> and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY)at(ccl.net
MI> 
MI> Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST)at(ccl.net 
MI> HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs 
MI> 
MI> If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
MI> Jan Labanowski,  jlabanow)at(nd.edu (read about it on CCL Home Page)
MI> -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
MI> 
MI> 
MI> 
MI> 
MI> 
MI> 



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Sat Apr 24 16:23:07 2004
Received: from smtp2.es.uci.edu (smtp2.es.uci.edu [128.200.80.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3OLN5KC026653
	for <chemistry(at)ccl.net>; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 16:23:06 -0500
Received: from 192.168.0.101 (vp087184.reshsg.uci.edu [128.195.87.184])
	by smtp2.es.uci.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3OLO9T9023186
	for <chemistry(at)ccl.net>; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:24:10 -0700
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:24:05 -0700
From: John Lee <g03(at)joyie.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r)
Reply-To: John Lee <g03(at)joyie.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1391216937.20040424142405(at)joyie.com>
To: chemistry(at)ccl.net
Subject: The dispersion forces in B3LYP calcualtion in G03
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NACS_ES-MailScanner: No viruses found
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=7.5 tests=DNS_FROM_RFCI_DSN,
	FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

Hi CCLers,

   In the calculation of water clusters. The binding energy calculated
by DFT hybrid model is smaller than that did by MP2 method. This could
be due to the miss of dispersion forces in the model. I wonder in G03
does this forces have been added to the DFT hybrid model?

-- 
Best regards,
John Lee



