From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed May 26 13:21:34 2004
Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4QILXi3028567
	for <chemistry^at^ccl.net>; Wed, 26 May 2004 13:21:34 -0500
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9])
	by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i4QIOchl024368
	for <chemistry^at^ccl.net>; Wed, 26 May 2004 11:24:39 -0700
Received: from gonaou (donald.chem.washington.edu [128.95.128.116])
	by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i4QIOcXD022562
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT)
	for <chemistry^at^ccl.net>; Wed, 26 May 2004 11:24:38 -0700
Message-ID: <005e01c4434e$b4784ef0$74805f80@gonaou>
From: "Carsten Detering" <detering^at^u.washington.edu>
To: <chemistry^at^ccl.net>
Subject: Dock5.1.1 +gbsa scoring
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 20:24:38 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

Dear fellow CClers,

I am having some trouble setting up a Dock5 run using the GBSA scoring. The
calculation with chemgrid/grid went fine, but when I set up the docking,
Dock5 dies right after/while reading the energy grid from grid.nrg. Dock4
has no problems using these grids.
Did anybody encounter similar problems, and knows how to fix this?

Thanks for helpful comments,

Carsten

--------------------------------------------
Carsten Detering, PhD
University of Washington
Department of Chemistry
Seattle, WA 98195
Fon 206.543.5081
Fax 206.685.8665



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed May 26 19:26:11 2004
Received: from fujitsu1.fujitsu.com (fujitsu1.fujitsu.com [192.240.0.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4R0Q9AI017442
	for <chemistry=at=ccl.net>; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:26:10 -0500
Received: from fujitsu1.fujitsu.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fujitsu1.fujitsu.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i4R0TGLG003285
	for <chemistry=at=ccl.net>; Wed, 26 May 2004 17:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fnanic.fujitsu.com ([133.164.253.2])
	by fujitsu1.fujitsu.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i4R0TBXv003223;
	Wed, 26 May 2004 17:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cachemai2.fnanic.fujitsu.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fnanic.fujitsu.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4R0T5xM001786;
	Wed, 26 May 2004 17:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daveg-lifebook.cachesoftware.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cachemai2.fnanic.fujitsu.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4R0bp8o010320;
	Wed, 26 May 2004 17:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.0.20040526171724.01c691f8@133.164.253.31>
X-Sender: dgallagher@133.164.253.31 (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:28:14 -0700
To: "Forlani Roberto" <roberto.forlani=at=nikemresearch.com>
From: David Gallagher <dgallagher=at=cachesoftware.com>
Subject: CCL:Keto-enol tautomerism studies
Cc: chemistry=at=ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <3578F30C8DBF04489FA7E4E563407BB40C0061=at=VSPW2113.nikemresea
 rch.dc>
References: <3578F30C8DBF04489FA7E4E563407BB40C0061=at=VSPW2113.nikemresearch.dc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=7.5 tests=NO_RDNS2 autolearn=no 
	version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

Hi Roberto,

We have a few comparisons of heats of reaction, and activation energies for 
some simple keto-enol tautomerizations using AM1, PM3, PM5, and DFT-PW91. 
We have also modelled the complete reaction paths for some of these 
reactions. I would be happy to send you these unpublished results along 
with the files if they are of any use.

Regards,
David Gallagher, Fujitsu.


At 02:10 AM 5/24/2004, Forlani Roberto wrote:
>Dear CCLers,
>
>         I'm looking for some general references about keto-enol 
> tautomerism studies with different semiempirical and/or ab initio methods 
> (... not sure about goodness of my keywords in article retrieval). I'm 
> particularly interested in methods comparison.
>
>I'll summarize all replies.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Roberto Forlani
>
>
>
>-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
>To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
>and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY=at=ccl.net
>
>Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST=at=ccl.net
>HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
>
>If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
>Jan Labanowski,  jlabanow=at=nd.edu (read about it on CCL Home Page)
>-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



