From chemistry-request@ccl.net Fri Sep 24 15:00:08 2004
Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8OK07io007597
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:00:07 -0500
Received: from hymn14.u.washington.edu (hymn14.u.washington.edu [140.142.16.151])
	by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i8OKAfDD005517
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:10:41 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hymn14.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i8OKAee3009761
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:10:40 -0700
Received: from [140.142.15.144] by hymn14.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:10:40 PDT
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: liaoyi_at_u.washington.edu
To: chemistry_at_ccl.net
Subject: parameters for conjuagation.
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0409241310400.5332_at_hymn14.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=7.5 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING,NO_REAL_NAME 
	autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

Dear Sirs: I have general question for you. When we talk about conjugated systems, we can have some general sense about which molecule has better conjugation. For example, a planar structure is better than a twisted one, double bond is better than triple bond, etc. I wonder if there are some sort of parameters that can be used to at least qualitively characterize the conjugation or how easy electron density flows through a bridge.
Thanks.
  Yi






From chemistry-request@ccl.net Sat Sep 25 02:23:28 2004
Received: from turmiel.ch.uj.edu.pl (turmiel.ch.uj.edu.pl [149.156.71.252])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8P7NQoU008585
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 02:23:27 -0500
Received: from turmiel.ch.uj.edu.pl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by turmiel.ch.uj.edu.pl (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8P7Y1lC011976
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:34:02 +0200
From: makowskm_at_chemia.uj.edu.pl
Received: (from apache@localhost)
	by turmiel.ch.uj.edu.pl (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i8P7Xxs3011974;
	Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:33:59 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: turmiel.ch.uj.edu.pl: apache set sender to makowskm_at_chemia.uj.edu.pl using -f
Received: from 83.29.94.67
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user makowskm)
        by mail.ch.uj.edu.pl with HTTP;
        Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:33:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1309.83.29.94.67.1096097639.squirrel_at_mail.ch.uj.edu.pl>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:33:59 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: CCL:configuration interaction
To: <chemistry_at_ccl.net>
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=7.5 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no 
	version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

You should use something like CIS(D,NStates=x,root=y) to obtain
perturbational second order correction to CIS energy of y-th state. But
you must remember that CIS even with second order correction is quite
rarely well suited to obtain reliable results for excited states, except
maybe the state dominated by HOMO->LUMO single excitation. When you are
interested in quantitative information about excited states you may
think of using CASSCF/CASPT2 metodology or some version of coupled
cluster methods (STOEM-CC or SAC-CI) or TD DFT.

Yours,
Dr Marcin Makowski
Jagiellonian University
Faculty of Chemistry

> Dear Netters,
>
> I try to study excited states of an organic molecule using G98.
> I would like to find the energy of the four lower excited states. I
> use CI.
>
> I did CIS and get the information I wanted but with wrong values for
> the energy of the excited states. so I would like to include double
> substitutions in the calculation. I use the keyword CISD : I get the
> total energy corrected by the CI but I could not get the energy of the
> excited states. Is it possible to have this information with G98? Any
> advice for another code?
>
> thanks, bye,
> C.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Criez gratuitement votre Yahoo! Mail avec 100 Mo de stockage !
> Criez votre Yahoo! Mail
>
> Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivi ! Dicouvrez toutes les
> nouveautis pour dialoguer instantaniment avec vos amis.Tilichargez
> GRATUITEMENT ici !





