From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Mar 29 09:15:23 2005
Received: from proxy2.uh.cu (smtp2.uh.cu [200.55.139.213])
	by server.ccl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2TEFFt4027228
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:15:18 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by proxy2.uh.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED46A2FCD3
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:15:36 -0400 (AST)
Received: from fq.uh.cu (unknown [192.168.3.4])
	by proxy2.uh.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0AAF2FC8D
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:15:36 -0400 (AST)
Received: from fq.uh.cu (IDENT:1563@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fq.uh.cu (8.12.4/8.12.4/JP) with ESMTP id j2TE9XFi008622
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:09:33 -0500
Received: from localhost (yoa@localhost)
	by fq.uh.cu (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) with ESMTP id j2TE9VpT008618
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:09:33 -0500
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:09:30 -0500 (CST)
From: yoana perez badel <yoa.-at-.fq.uh.cu>
To: chemistry.-at-.ccl.net
Subject: searching TS
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0503290829230.6889-100000.-at-.fq.uh.cu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO 
	autolearn=failed version=3.0.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on server.ccl.net

Hello CCL members:
I am studing a proton transfer reaction.
I am locating a TS. I am using the B3LYP functional and 6-31g** basis
set.I tried to QST2 and QST3 options and I obtained a
minimum structure instead of a saddle point.
I know There are some systems for which the default optimization procedure
may not succeed on its own. I computed the force constants at the initial
point. After that I optimized opt(ts,noeigentest,ReadFC)
but I obtained another TS. When I
examined the imaginary frequency's normal mode the TS not
connect the reactan and product.

Does anybody knows another way to following?
Thanks, yoana




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Mar 29 10:12:02 2005
Received: from fletxa.iqs.es (fletxa.iqs.es [193.145.86.7])
	by server.ccl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2TFBu5P030675
	for <CHEMISTRY |a| ccl.net>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:11:56 -0500
Received: from scorreu.IQS.LOCAL (v10iqs24.iqs.url.es [192.168.10.231])
	by fletxa.iqs.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA21182
	for <CHEMISTRY |a| ccl.net>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:54:11 +0200
Received: from sowa.IQS.LOCAL ([193.145.86.13]) by scorreu.IQS.LOCAL with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
	 Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:55:20 +0200
Received: from OBDULIAABXH6VD ([192.168.30.9]unverified) by sowa.IQS.LOCAL 
	with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:55:18 +0200
From: "Obdulia Rabal" <mrabal |a| iqs.es>
To: <CHEMISTRY |a| ccl.net>
Subject: TYROSINE KINASE HOMOLOGY MODELLING
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:56:28 +0200
Message-ID: <POEAILMOEMGAFJKOKEIKOEGMCAAA.mrabal |a| iqs.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <308436974.13820 |a| mail.ccnu.edu.cn>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-imss-version: 2.024
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:59.59336 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:4 M:4 S:4 R:4 (0.0000 0.0000)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2005 13:55:20.0364 (UTC) FILETIME=[F2235EC0:01C53466]
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.0.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on server.ccl.net


Dear all,

Could anybody advise to me a standard / traditional manner of dealing with
domain tyrosine kinase insert (KID) when homology modelling tyrosine
kinases?

I have looked for some literature but only a pair of references remark this
point.


Thanks in advance

Obdulia



