From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Jun 23 21:02:15 2005
Received: from web32611.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32611.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.238])
	by server.ccl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j5O1288F011745
	for <chemistry<<at>>ccl.net>; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:02:08 -0400
Received: (qmail 60738 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Jun 2005 00:02:07 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=JRGKQs+A6c4pg8IGW6CoDfDt65g1CKO93zkRO7x+HsCMEz1FXgnceUm5l1qE3XIyEXtfG6LnOyj/PvRn7YaocNnTEyyfCd1DEf8uVliwc9hy6j7++KqjV+3LA43veDYpx804nmTW/3Lx3/EEtLki/kNNK27mgUeWoLfJc3PDKmA=  ;
Message-ID: <20050624000207.60736.qmail<<at>>web32611.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.217.88.199] by web32611.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:02:07 ART
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:02:07 -0300 (ART)
From: rodrigo souza <souzarod21<<at>>yahoo.com.br>
Subject:  PEDRA: too many spheres; increase Omega
To: chemistry<<at>>ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,
	FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY autolearn=no version=3.0.3
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on server.ccl.net

Hello all,
>
>           I am trying to optimize some systems in
water using Gaussian 98. However, the
> job stops and gives this error message. Could
anybody help me with this?
> My input is;
>
>  #p b3lyp/6-31++G** scrf=(iefpcm,solvent=water,read)
opt
>
> Error was;
>
>  PEDRA: too many spheres; increase Omega
>  Error termination via Lnk1e in
/usr/local/bin/g98_a09_vega/g98/l502.exe.
>  Job cpu time:  0 days  3 hours 35 minutes 59.1
seconds.
>  File lengths (MBytes):  RWF=  191 Int=    0 D2E=   
0 Chk=    4 Scr=    1
>
>
> Thank in advance
>
> Rodrigo Souza
> Instituto de Qummica
> Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
>



	
	
		
_______________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Acesso Gratis - Internet rapida e gratis. 
Instale o discador agora! http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Jun 23 18:58:13 2005
Received: from web31606.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31606.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.152])
	by server.ccl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j5NMw9n9005659
	for <chemistry=at=ccl.net>; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:58:09 -0400
Received: (qmail 81057 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Jun 2005 21:58:07 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=CYj8+o/M0vJsOG948r36lJdG8S2msJS3JJX7QrvYPLqigKdUn8UnAjBHlwnfrQhgZFyq6qzT8xNPU1u5jufapPFd+wkfcIksw4h+eheitET5mddxYVqDpDOS1x7k7bPcae/JDes3hmdkBBtWjQ8OyYYDAVzj+TLs478U61oFbTE=  ;
Message-ID: <20050623215807.81051.qmail=at=web31606.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.118.108.194] by web31606.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:58:07 PDT
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gustavo Mercier <gamercier=at=yahoo.com>
Reply-To: gamercier=at=yahoo.com
Subject: Re: CCL:Plot NBO-orbitals
To: chemistry=at=ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20050623163141.019f2e30=at=mailsrv2.uni-oldenburg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1796789442-1119563887=:79524"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,
	FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.0.3
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on server.ccl.net

--0-1796789442-1119563887=:79524
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

HI!
 
You can try gopenmol. I've not tried to plot NBO's with gaussian, but using pcgamess gopenmol has been more successful than molekel or molden.
 
Bye!
Gustavo
gamercier=at=yahoo.com

Torsten Bruhn <torsten.bruhn=at=mail.uni-oldenburg.de> wrote:
Hello,

is there a way to plot NBO orbitals calculated by the NBO module in 
Gaussian 03? I use gen as keyword for the basisset and so Molekel did not 
work, is it possible to plot the NBO-Orbitals with molden?

Greets
--
Dipl.-Chem. Torsten Bruhn

Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg
Institute for Pure and Applied Chemistry
P.O. Box 2503
D-26111 Oldenburg
Germany

Tel: +49(0)441-7983676 Fax: +49(0)441-7983329
E-mail: torsten.bruhn=at=mail.uni-oldenburg.de



-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
and send your message to: CHEMISTRY=at=ccl.net

Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST=at=ccl.net 
HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs 

If your is mail bouncing from ccl.net domain due to spam filters, please
use the Web based form from CCL Home Page 
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+






--0-1796789442-1119563887=:79524
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<DIV>HI!</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>You can try gopenmol. I've not tried to plot NBO's with gaussian, but using pcgamess gopenmol has been more successful than molekel or molden.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Bye!</DIV>
<DIV>Gustavo</DIV>
<DIV><A href="mailto:gamercier=at=yahoo.com">gamercier=at=yahoo.com</A><BR><BR><B><I>Torsten Bruhn &lt;torsten.bruhn=at=mail.uni-oldenburg.de&gt;</I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Hello,<BR><BR>is there a way to plot NBO orbitals calculated by the NBO module in <BR>Gaussian 03? I use gen as keyword for the basisset and so Molekel did not <BR>work, is it possible to plot the NBO-Orbitals with molden?<BR><BR>Greets<BR>--<BR>Dipl.-Chem. Torsten Bruhn<BR><BR>Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg<BR>Institute for Pure and Applied Chemistry<BR>P.O. Box 2503<BR>D-26111 Oldenburg<BR>Germany<BR><BR>Tel: +49(0)441-7983676 Fax: +49(0)441-7983329<BR>E-mail: torsten.bruhn=at=mail.uni-oldenburg.de<BR><BR><BR><BR>-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-<BR>To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line<BR>and send your message to: CHEMISTRY=at=ccl.net<BR><BR>Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST=at=ccl.net <BR>HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs <BR><BR>If
 your is mail bouncing from ccl.net domain due to spam filters, please<BR>use the Web based form from CCL Home Page <BR>-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
--0-1796789442-1119563887=:79524--


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Fri Jun 24 07:28:33 2005
Received: from FRESNO.NET.UNIOVI.ES (fresno.net.uniovi.es [156.35.11.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5OBSSx0032579
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 07:28:28 -0400
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.fresno.net.uniovi.es by fresno.net.uniovi.es
 (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30969) id <01LPU7L1NDZK003HO0.-at-.fresno.net.uniovi.es> for
 chemistry.-at-.ccl.net; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:12:16 +0200 (MET)
Received: from webuniovi.innova.uniovi.es
 (webuniovi.innova.uniovi.es [156.35.33.99])
 by fresno.net.uniovi.es (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30969)
 with ESMTP id <01LPU7L1BBT00043ZN.-at-.fresno.net.uniovi.es> for chemistry.-at-.ccl.net;
 Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:12:15 +0200 (MET)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=priv120.usc.es)
	by webuniovi.innova.uniovi.es with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DllA1-00068F-00	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:11:45 +0200
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:07:03 +0200
From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Rub=E9n?= Meana =?UNKNOWN?Q?Pa=F1eda?=
 <rubenmp.-at-.correo.uniovi.es>
Subject: Rerun with SCF=IntRep.???
X-Sender: rubenmp.-at-.correo.uniovi.es
To: chemistry.-at-.ccl.net
Reply-to: rubenmp.-at-.correo.uniovi.es
Message-id: <jUsT.aNoTheR.mEsSaGe.iD.111960790523552.-at-.www.uniovi.es>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mailreader.com v2.3.36 (2005-03-14)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
X-Originating-Host: priv120.usc.es [193.144.74.118]; Fri,
 24 Jun 2005 10:11:45 GMT
X-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; es-ES; rv:1.7.6)
 Gecko/20050321 Firefox/1.0.2, JavaScript: On
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed 
	version=3.0.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on server.ccl.net


Hi All!

I am running a HFS/aug-cc-pVDZ calculation (with G03) in a system 
with symmetry (symmetry=veryloose) and have had
problems in getting the SCF to converge.

I have tried using SCF=QC, but it failed to converge during the optimisation 
and I got the following output :
 
 Gradient too large for Newton-Raphson -- use scaled steepest descent 
instead.
     ILin= 1 X=0.000D+00 Y=-8.965817694343D+02 DE= 0.00D+00
     ILin= 2 X=4.580D-01 Y=-8.967948943562D+02 DE=-2.13D-01
 Density matrix breaks symmetry, PCut= 1.80D-03
 Rerun with SCF=IntRep.
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /opt/cesga//g03/l508.exe at Thu Jun 
23 13:59:06
2005.


Has anyone any ideas on what is happening and how to overcome this 
problem?

Thanks in advance,

Rubin Meana Paqeda PhD Student







===================================================================
EASY and FREE access to your email anywhere: http://Mailreader.com/
Powered by Debian: http://www.debian.org
===================================================================




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Fri Jun 24 11:51:18 2005
Received: from web31505.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31505.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.134])
	by server.ccl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j5OFpBlC023334
	for <chemistry*&*ccl.net>; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:51:12 -0400
Received: (qmail 3452 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Jun 2005 15:51:10 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=PYa5lyayjLwVZcFKPUsbtKvVauRqQ7zDjAP0+cVflI0UOYC3LMZUL699/dLck1UUX1dYhkUelBic6Uj/uzLoQeayoaILxkFjtRAM+sXmNdgaCNm4BFr88QafTqK3gJMYYpAjuUNoKOllka52yI1CPtBl1LG2bS2gvSiddR8AJ4w=  ;
Message-ID: <20050624155110.3450.qmail*&*web31505.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [165.106.23.135] by web31505.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:51:10 PDT
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vincent Xianlong Wang <xloongw*&*yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: CCL:accuracy of relative energies with DFT
To: chemistry*&*ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <8869461531dc7a91b36ed2fd54ae68bb*&*few.vu.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,
	FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.0.3
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on server.ccl.net



--- Marcel Swart <m.swart*&*few.vu.nl> wrote:

> Hi Silviu,
> 
> as you can see in my Mol.Phys. 102 (2004) p. 2467
> paper, PBE gives an
> accuracy of 11.8 kcal/mol for the atomization
> energies of the G2/97 set,
> when used with a TZP basis set;
> note also that there are other GGA functionals that
> perform much better.
> 
> For the atomization energies, you test the absolute
> value of the energy,
> while for the energies of the different isomers, you
> compare the 
> relative
> energy; I would expect the error in the atomization
> energy to be much 
> larger
> than that in the relative energy of isomers; the
> latter is probably 
> smaller
> than the 1.0 kcal/mol you mentioned.

Hi Dr. Swart, is this error just your guess or you
have some evidence, either theoretical or
experimental?
Thanks. 

Vincent

> NB.
> Please let me know if you have trouble locating the
> paper,
> and I will send you an off-print.
> 
> On Jun 22, 2005, at 11:30 PM, Silviu Zilberman
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been studying transition metal complexes
> with DFT (PBE 
> > xc-functional). I think that a typical accuracy of
> PBE is around 10 
> > kcal/mol.
> >
> > I was wondering, when comparing very similar
> isomers, should I expect 
> > higher accuracy in the relative total energies. I
> have seen papers 
> > reporting differences of ~1 kcal/mol, but is it
> reliable?
> >
> > Thanks, SIlviu.
> 
>                                             
> dr. Marcel Swart
> 
> Theoretische Chemie
> Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
> Faculteit der Exacte Wetenschappen
> 
> De Boelelaan 1083
> 1081 HV Amsterdam
> The Netherlands
> 
> Tel		+31-(0)20-5987619
> Fax		+31-(0)20-5987629
> E-mail	m.swart*&*few.vu.nl
> Web		http://www.few.vu.nl/~swart
>                                             
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


