From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 04:51:00 2005 From: "Ulrike Salzner salzner,fen.bilkent.edu.tr" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Linda with Fedora Message-Id: <-29919-051110013826-20052-y0Qx374WvZhqnYuh6PX9Kg*server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Ulrike Salzner Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:38:18 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Ulrike Salzner [salzner!^!fen.bilkent.edu.tr] I am about to built a Linux cluster using Linda/G03. I am using Fedora Core 3 and 4. Since this version of Linux is not supported by Gaussian, I need to know whether Linda will work. Gaussian runs fine with Fedora Core 3 but it seems to have problems with FC4 kernel 2.6.11-1.1369. Has anyone managed to get a cluster working with Fedora Core 3 or 4? Thanks in advance for any advice. Ulrike -- Ulrike Salzner Associate Professor Department of Chemistry Bilkent University 06800 Bilkent, Ankara Turkey From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 05:37:00 2005 From: "Sigismondo Boschi s.boschi~~cineca.it" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Ab initio simulations of ice-X Message-Id: <-29920-051110051559-20968-GK4I6qI88Tzaqh6Caabf/A:+:server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Sigismondo Boschi Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:06:32 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Sigismondo Boschi [s.boschi:_:cineca.it] A Collegue of mine is co-author of this, but there are many: C. Cavazzoni, G.L. Chiarotti, S.Scandolo, E.Tosatti, M.Bernasconi, and M. Parrinello "Superprotonic and metallic states of water and ammonia at giant planet conditions", Science 283, 44-46, (1999). Inside the pubblication list of this article you can find many others Regards, Sigismondo Steven Kirk steven.kirk.-#-.htu.se wrote: > Sent to CCL by: "Steven Kirk" [steven.kirk#,#htu.se] > Hello, > > I would like to ask if anyone on this list is aware of any ab initio electron structure calculations of the high-pressure ice phase ice-X. This is interesting as it has a Cu_{2}O -type structure, and the hydrogen bonds are centrosymmetric (i.e. the H atom is equidistant from both what would be conventionally regarded as the 'donor' and 'acceptor' O atoms). > > I have searched the Phys. Rev. and Nature indices, with no success thus far. I would be grateful for any pointers to literature or web pages of active researchers in this area. > > Many thanks in advance, > Steve Kirk> > > > -- Sigismondo Boschi, Ph.D. tel: +39 051 6171559 CINECA (High Performance Systems) fax: +39 051 6137273 - 6132198 via Magnanelli, 6/3 http://instm.cineca.it 40033 Casalecchio di Reno (BO)-ITALY http://www.cineca.it From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 08:03:01 2005 From: "Marc Baaden baaden]![smplinux.de" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Intel Fortran compiler (was using DELPHI with g77 and gcc !) Message-Id: <-29921-051110074959-7058-1fzdspd2GDjEu88OUJP/bA]_[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Marc Baaden Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:49:43 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Marc Baaden [baaden#%#smplinux.de] Dear All, >>> "David F. Green dfgreen[]ams.sunysb.edu" said: [..] >> If you will be unning under Linux on x86 architecture (Intel or AMD), I >> would suggest using Intel's compilers (free for non-commerical use): [..] Just a comment on David's qualification as "free for non-commercial use" for Intel's Fortran compiler. It should be noted that Intel has quite a specific interpretation of this, and I would guess that quite a number of labs are violating the license because they are not aware of this subtle definition. In particular (from Intel's FAQ [1]): Q. I am engaged in research projects. Can I qualify to use the noncommercial product? A. If you, as an individual, are receiving any form of compensation for the research project (i.e., you receive a salary, or funding, etc.) you do not qualify for a non-commercial license. However, if your research is a personal project for which you are not getting compensated in any way, you do qualify for a noncommercial-use license. Q. I am a professor. Can I use the non-commercial product as part of the coursework I teach? A. No. Teaching is a profession and you are getting compensated for it. You may, however, qualify for the academic license. (Click to academic page) etc. So this might not be utterly appealing to most researchers. MB [1] http://www.intel.com/cd/software/products/asmo-na/eng/compilers/flin/219692.htm -- Dr. Marc Baaden - Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris mailto:baaden++smplinux.de - http://www.baaden.ibpc.fr FAX: +33 15841 5026 - Tel: +33 15841 5176 ou +33 609 843217 From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 08:38:00 2005 From: "john furr john.furr ~ gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Linda with Fedora Message-Id: <-29922-051110055741-11723-blmwIXlZWwMdPzxhHfSJ2w]^[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: john furr Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 05:57:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: john furr [john.furr[]gmail.com] Both OS's will cluster quite easily. However mixing them may give you some issues. In Fedora Core 4 the default version of gcc is 4.0.0. However in Fedora Core 3 it is gcc-3.4.2 (I think). The two are NOT binary compatible regardless of what some people say. Personally I like Core 4 much better than Core 3. However it sounds like your application (Gaussian) only works right with Core 3. I suggest going with Core 3. With that said. I have seen a few stability issues with Core 3. I have a small cluster running Core 4 machines and they all have an uptime of about 3 months...would be longer but the power grid here in Albany NY is quite pathetic. Well that certainly wasn't a Gaussian specific answer but I hope there was some useful information any how. Cheers John Furr Dynamol Inc. http://www.dynamol.com On 11/10/05, Ulrike Salzner salzner,fen.bilkent.edu.tr wrote: > Sent to CCL by: Ulrike Salzner [salzner!^!fen.bilkent.edu.tr] > I am about to built a Linux cluster using Linda/G03. I am using Fedora > Core 3 and 4. Since this version of Linux is not supported by Gaussian, > I need to know whether Linda will work. Gaussian runs fine with Fedora > Core 3 but it seems to have problems with FC4 kernel 2.6.11-1.1369. > > Has anyone managed to get a cluster working with Fedora Core 3 or 4? > Thanks in advance for any advice. > > Ulrike > -- > Ulrike Salzner > Associate Professor > Department of Chemistry > Bilkent University > 06800 Bilkent, Ankara > Turkey> > > > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 09:26:01 2005 From: "Marcin Dulak Marcin_Dulak~!~poczta.onet.pl" To: CCL Subject: CCL: A LaTeX and pdf database of XC and kinetic functionals (by Fabien Tran) Message-Id: <-29923-051110090515-11848-B3Uk0F94odfmehEVJdXY9g!=!server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Marcin Dulak Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:03:04 +0100 MIME-version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Marcin Dulak [Marcin_Dulak.:.poczta.onet.pl] Dear CCLers, it is to announce the first version of the LaTeX database with formulas of DFT XC and kinetic functionals (by Fabien Tran). I'm not aware of any other similar existing one - you just copy and paste the formula you need. I hope this is a first step to save our "scientific" time when writing papers. http://scsg20.unige.ch/~dulak/files/functionals.tex Please send any comments or "bug" reports directly Marcin_Dulak(-at-)poczta.onet.pl Faithfully yours, Marcin Dulak From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 10:36:00 2005 From: "Abrash, Samuel sabrash-#-richmond.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Calculation of Counterpoise Corrected Binding Energies using G03 Message-Id: <-29924-051110103252-11980-ns+drQBLiycgT6dhYceXxg-x-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Abrash, Samuel" content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:32:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Abrash, Samuel" [sabrash(0)richmond.edu] Hi, I just started using the Counterpoise keyword in Gaussian to get BSSE corrected optimized geometries and binding energies of hydrogen bonded complexes. The output includes the BSSE corrected energy. The question I have now is how to calculate the binding energy. If I hadn't already done the counterpoise correction, what I'd do is to create a job with an acetylene monomer, plus dummy atoms carrying the basis functions for the other acetylene monomer, calculate this energy, and subtract twice this energy from the non-BSSE corrected dimer energy. Since the energy I have for the dimer is now BSSE corrected, do I get the binding energy simply by calculating the monomer energy (with no dummy atoms and no extra basis functions), and subtracting twice this energy from the BSSE corrected dimer energy? Thanks for your time! Best, Sam Abrash From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 11:10:00 2005 From: "Eugen Leitl eugen,,leitl.org" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: [nixon(a)nsc.liu.se: Re: [Beowulf] [owner-chemistry(a)ccl.net: CCL:G: Linda with Fedora]] Message-Id: <-29925-051110110004-31177-xMhPHI4tMqof9y6DAwFmHw(a)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Eugen Leitl Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:59:46 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Eugen Leitl [eugen(-)leitl.org] ----- Forwarded message from Leif Nixon ----- > From: Leif Nixon Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:55:27 +0100 To: Eugen Leitl Cc: Beowulf]![beowulf.org Subject: Re: [Beowulf] [owner-chemistry]![ccl.net: CCL:G: Linda with Fedora] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Eugen Leitl writes: > On 11/10/05, Ulrike Salzner salzner,fen.bilkent.edu.tr > wrote: >> Sent to CCL by: Ulrike Salzner [salzner!^!fen.bilkent.edu.tr] >> I am about to built a Linux cluster using Linda/G03. I am using Fedora >> Core 3 and 4. Since this version of Linux is not supported by Gaussian, >> I need to know whether Linda will work. Gaussian runs fine with Fedora >> Core 3 but it seems to have problems with FC4 kernel 2.6.11-1.1369. I'd say it's the libc version that creates problems for Gaussian, not the kernel. I'd recommend using CentOS 3 or 4 rather than Fedora Core. Fedora is too rapidly moving, and you never know when an update might cause Gaussian to keel over. CentOS (a free rebuild of Red Hat Enterprise) is much more conservative than Fedora, but similar enough that you won't have any trouble dealing with it if you are used to Fedora. We have managed to get Gaussian 03 work with Linda on CentOS 3, after much frustration and swearing. The trick is to use Linda binaries compiled on Red Hat 8. Those binaries end up having just the right set of libc dependencies to work with the CentOS 3 libc version. Of course, you end up paying $500 to Gaussian in "media fee" to get those binaries, even if you have already paid for the full-out compute center source code license for Gaussian. (You don't get the Linda source code, though.) (I'm assuming Eugen will cross-post back to the correct list, or that Ulrike reads this list.) -- Leif Nixon - Systems expert ------------------------------------------------------------ National Supercomputer Centre - Linkoping University ------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf]![beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl leitl ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 12:01:01 2005 From: "David F. Green dfgreen,+,ams.sunysb.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Intel Fortran compiler (was using DELPHI with g77 and gcc !) Message-Id: <-29926-051110115852-2487-0uPgJ2zYGhtcBNcd5fiWJg(_)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "David F. Green" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:00:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "David F. Green" [dfgreen%ams.sunysb.edu] Thanks for the tip, Marc; I (obviously) wasn't aware of that restriction. I would suggest though, that investing in a good compiler that can produce well-optimized instructions for your architecture is often a good idea. If you are doing a lot of calculations, the performance boost you get (especially factored over a cluster) is easily worth it; a 10% performance gain on each of 10 nodes is equivalent to an extra machine. Of course, if you will just be doing the occasional calculation, this logic may not apply. I should note, I'm generally a big fan of Free Software, and the Gnu compilers are impressive in the range of achitectures they support, but they simply do not produce particularly fast code, and sometimes that needs to be considered (this applies to C/C++ as well as to Fortran). Cheers, David. ======================================================================== David F. Green Assistant Professor http://www.ams.sunysb.edu/~dfgreen/ Applied Mathematics and Statistics Stony Brook University Office: +1-631-632-9344 Math Tower, Room 1-117 Mobile: +1-617-953-3922 Stony Brook, NY 11794-3600 Fax: +1-631-632-8490 ======================================================================== Marc Baaden baaden]![smplinux.de wrote: > Sent to CCL by: Marc Baaden [baaden#%#smplinux.de] > > Dear All, > > >>>>"David F. Green dfgreen[]ams.sunysb.edu" said: > > [..] > >> If you will be unning under Linux on x86 architecture (Intel or AMD), I > >> would suggest using Intel's compilers (free for non-commerical use): > [..] > > Just a comment on David's qualification as "free for non-commercial use" for > Intel's Fortran compiler. > > It should be noted that Intel has quite a specific interpretation of this, > and I would guess that quite a number of labs are violating the license because > they are not aware of this subtle definition. In particular (from Intel's > FAQ [1]): > > > Q. I am engaged in research projects. Can I qualify to use the noncommercial product? > A. If you, as an individual, are receiving any form of compensation for the research project (i.e., you receive a salary, or funding, etc.) you do not qualify for a non-commercial license. However, if your research is a personal project for which you are not getting compensated in any way, you do qualify for a noncommercial-use license. > > Q. I am a professor. Can I use the non-commercial product as part of the coursework I teach? > A. No. Teaching is a profession and you are getting compensated for it. You may, however, qualify for the academic license. (Click to academic page) > > etc. > > So this might not be utterly appealing to most researchers. > > MB > > > [1] http://www.intel.com/cd/software/products/asmo-na/eng/compilers/flin/219692.htm From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 12:35:01 2005 From: "Sergio Emanuel Galembeck segalemb .. usp.br" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Calculation of Counterpoise Corrected Binding Energies using G03 Message-Id: <-29927-051110115920-2765-zd9//CDZHavFyOT2thLfjA(-)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Sergio Emanuel Galembeck Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:59:12 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Sergio Emanuel Galembeck [segalemb_-_usp.br] Dear Samuel, The counterpoise method as is implemented in G03 presents the energies in the following order: E(complex), E(monomer1, dummy monomer2), E(monomer2, dummy monomer1), E(monomer1), E(monomer2), where E(monomer1, dummy monomer2) is the energy of monomer1 with dummy atoms for monomer2. and E(monomer1) is the energy of monomer1 in the geometry of the complex. Best regards, Sergio Galembeck ============================================================== Sergio Emanuel Galembeck Assistant Professor in Physical Chemistry Departamento de Quimica Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciencias e Letras de Ribeirao Preto Universidade de Sao Paulo Av Bandeirantes, 3900 Ribeirao Preto, SP Brasil phone: +55-16-602-37-65 fax: +55-16-633-81-51 e-mail: segalemb]^[usp.br ============================================================== Citando "Abrash, Samuel sabrash-#-richmond.edu" : > Sent to CCL by: "Abrash, Samuel" [sabrash(0)richmond.edu] > Hi, > > I just started using the Counterpoise keyword in Gaussian to get BSSE > corrected optimized geometries and binding energies of hydrogen bonded > complexes. > > The output includes the BSSE corrected energy. > > The question I have now is how to calculate the binding energy. If I hadn't > already done the counterpoise correction, what I'd do is to create a job with > an acetylene monomer, plus dummy atoms carrying the basis functions for the > other acetylene monomer, calculate this energy, and subtract twice this > energy from the non-BSSE corrected dimer energy. > > Since the energy I have for the dimer is now BSSE corrected, do I get the > binding energy simply by calculating the monomer energy (with no dummy atoms > and no extra basis functions), and subtracting twice this energy from the > BSSE corrected dimer energy? > > Thanks for your time! > > Best, > > Sam Abrash> > > > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 15:13:00 2005 From: "Yao-Ying Chien chieny _ msu.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: water melting simulation Message-Id: <-29928-051110145901-22457-YnMH7SrytD1H++CQ9PnXyA---server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Yao-Ying Chien Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:47:29 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Yao-Ying Chien [chieny!^!msu.edu] Hi, I am interested in water melting simulation (from ice to water; (would be nice if ) then water to ice). It must have been done extensively. I did a quick search in SCI, but got (too) many returns. Read a few of them, but could not pin point who are the first ones simulated water melting successfully. Could you please point me the right keywords for the literature search? Pointers to Review papers or Web sites are great! Names of pioneers who failed but laid the foundation for others to succeed are welcome too. A scientist I ran into 2 years ago at ACS meeting told me a Japanese scientist has done it on supercomputer. Could you please tell me the name of the Japanese scientist, or the year, to help me narrow down the literature search? A scientist mentioned that MD can do it. Is that so? My intuition is that some quantum level simulation may involve. Basically, I wish to see motion pictures when water melts (and hopefully become ice again). How the 1st few ice molecules decide to break their H-bonds to form a cluster of water molecules. And why do they break-- does it require some form of "seed" in the neighborhood to initiate the process? Does the same "seed" initiate the freezing as well? Any evidences to support or against the observations (or the predictions) in the simulations? Thanks, Yao-Ying Chien From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 15:48:00 2005 From: "Perry E. Metzger perry*piermont.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Intel Fortran compiler Message-Id: <-29929-051110135108-23129-nM9HDi7z4eLaYBu6Rd7UMw:server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Perry E. Metzger" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:50:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Perry E. Metzger" [perry::piermont.com] "David F. Green dfgreen,+,ams.sunysb.edu" writes: > I should note, I'm generally a big fan of Free Software, and the Gnu > compilers are impressive in the range of achitectures they support, > but they simply do not produce particularly fast code, and sometimes > that needs to be considered (this applies to C/C++ as well as to > Fortran). That depends. For some architectures, languages, target programs, and versions of GCC, GCC works best. For others, it does not. It is very dependent, as I said, on the architecture you're running on, the language you're compiling, what code you're compiling, and (very very important!) which version of gcc and which optimization flags you set. I recommend benchmarking the code you're actually going to run on the machines you'll run it on -- nothing beats an actual experiment in cases like this. Especially if you're going to do a lot of computation, taking a little bit of time and trying a few things (including different settings of the optimization flags in your compilers) pays off handsomely in the end. Oh, and repeating that last bit one more time -- modern compilers have LOTS of optimizations you can turn on and off. Reading the documentation and experimenting with the flags is key. Never assume that the same optimizations will produce the best results for all programs you compile. Perry From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 16:23:00 2005 From: "Julius Su jsu[#]caltech.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: very accurate wavefunctions for H2? Message-Id: <-29930-051110142912-18271-jfV6tO3fFToEnzxvQTowRw[-]server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Julius Su" Sent to CCL by: "Julius Su" [jsu-x-caltech.edu] Hello, I am trying to calculate very accurate wavefunctions for H2 for use in developing density functionals. So far, I have a partial implementation of the James-Coolidge wavefunction (Rev. Mod. Phys. 32(2) 1960, p. 219): psi = exp(-a (z1 + z2)) z1^p n1^q z2^r n2^s r12^u (elliptic coords) and am interested in getting coefficients for the Kolos-Wolniewicz wavefunction: (J. Chem. Phys. 43(7) 1965, p. 2429) psi = exp(-a1 z1 - a2 z2) cosh (b1 n1 + b2 n2) z1^p n1^q z2^r n2^s r12^u Does anyone have code for computing coefficients for either of these wavefunctions? Thanks, Julius From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 16:57:00 2005 From: "Osman Guner osman ~~ san.rr.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Second Call for Papers - Advances in Pharmacophores and 3D Screening Message-Id: <-29931-051110123115-213-D7zuo+GS+2jQeIZKLozYSQ[*]server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Osman Guner" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C5E5E6.ED26A9E0" Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:07:21 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Osman Guner" [osman===san.rr.com] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C5E5E6.ED26A9E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please note the deadline for submission of abstracts through OASYS is November 23. We still have a number of openings for oral presentations. Feel free to contact me for any questions. Cheers.Osman _____ From: Osman Guner [mailto:osman^^^san.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 2:01 PM To: 'chemistry-request^^^ccl.net'; 'CHMINF-L^^^LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU' Subject: Call for Papers - Advances in Pharmacophores and 3D Screening Advances in Pharmacophores and 3D Screening Organized by Chemical Information Division (CINF) Co-sponsored by Computers in Chemistry (COMP), and Medicinal Chemistry (MEDI) Divisions At 231st ACS National Meeting, Atlanta, GA, March 26-30, 2006 Recent developments in three-dimensional screening and data-mining techniques will be covered with specific focus in pharmacophores and 3D-searching., If you are interested in being a speaker for this symposium, please submit an abstract via the ACS OASYS system. A direct link to the CINF sessions is below: http://oasys.acs.org/acs/231nm/cinf/papers/index.cgi The deadline for abstract submission is November 23. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C5E5E6.ED26A9E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Please note the deadline for = submission of abstracts through OASYS is November 23.  We still have a number of openings for oral presentations.

 

Feel free to contact me for any = questions.

 

Cheers…Osman=

 


From: Osman = Guner [mailto:osman^^^san.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October = 19, 2005 2:01 PM
To: 'chemistry-request^^^ccl.net'; 'CHMINF-L^^^LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU'
Subject: Call for Papers = - Advances in Pharmacophores and 3D Screening

 

Advances in Pharmacophores = and 3D Screening

Organized by Chemical Information Division = (CINF)

Co-sponsored by Computers in Chemistry (COMP), and Medicinal = Chemistry (MEDI) Divisions

 

At 231st ACS National Meeting, Atlanta, GA, March 26-30, = 2006 

 

Recent developments in three-dimensional screening and = data-mining techniques will be covered with specific focus in pharmacophores and 3D-searching.,

 

If you are interested in being a speaker for this symposium, = please submit an abstract via the ACS OASYS system. A direct link to the CINF = sessions is below:

 

http://oas= ys.acs.org/acs/231nm/cinf/papers/index.cgi

 

The deadline for abstract submission is November = 23.

 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C5E5E6.ED26A9E0-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 18:08:01 2005 From: "Eric Scerri scerri__chem.ucla.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: question on molecular orbitals in CO and NO Message-Id: <-29933-051110165048-28829-EQkz2wadQgHxO+61RoyFmA(-)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Eric Scerri Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:48:26 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Sent to CCL by: Eric Scerri [scerri!^!chem.ucla.edu] In teaching qualitative molecular orbital theory one encounters the question of the crossing of the sigma 2p and pi 2p bonding orbitals in homonuclear diatomics. This is such that N2 has the pi orbitals of lower energy than sigma whereas for O2 the energies are reversed. But what about heteronuclear diatomics where each of the atoms ? The ordering given in general chemistry textbooks shows a wide variation. See for example Oxtoby, Zumdahl or Olmsted and Williams, all three of which contradict each other. Herzberg's, Spectra of Diatomic Molecules specifically states the configurations of CO and NO. For CO the ordering is as in the case of N2 whereas for NO the ordering is as in O2. However Herzberg's book is now a little out of date (1950). Do more recent calculations on these two molecules suggest anything different? Would anyone be prepared to run these calculations and tell me the results? How about experimental evidence such as PES on CO and NO? regards, eric scerri From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 17:33:01 2005 From: "Andy Holder holdera**umkc.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: COMP: Division Survey Message-Id: <-29932-051110161011-341-FkCz/tYjyjhwyw8TFGyrIg-,-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Andy Holder" Sent to CCL by: "Andy Holder" [holdera*umkc.edu] Hello! The COMP Division of the ACS is interested in hearing your opinion about our current and future activities. The information will be used to improve our current services to our membership and plan new services. It will just take a moment to complete, and the results will be sanitized of all personal or indentifying information. You can access the survey from a link on the Division's webpage at: http://membership.acs.org/c/Comp/ Thanks! Andy Holder -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CCCC OOOO MMM MMM PPPP | ANDREW J. HOLDER CC CC OO OO MM MM P PP | 2005 Chair CCC OO OO MMM MMM PPPP | Dept. of Chemistry CC CC OO OO M MMM M PP | Univ. of Missouri-Kansas City CCCC OOOO MMM M MMM PP | Kansas City, MO 64110 | holdera.:.umkc.edu Computers in Chemistry Division | (816)235-2293 * (816)235-6543 F American Chemical Society | -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 18:43:00 2005 From: "Andrey G. Kalinichev kalinich()uiuc.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: water melting simulation Message-Id: <-29934-051110180210-7992-sg7PrZmlGT5EnkRtNzjuCg-#-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Andrey G. Kalinichev" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:24:25 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Andrey G. Kalinichev" [kalinich|a|uiuc.edu] Masakazu Matsumoto, Shinji Saito and Iwao Ohmine Molecular dynamics simulation of the ice nucleation and growth process leading to water freezing Nature 416, 409-413 (28 March 2002) http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v416/n6879/abs/416409a.html ---- Original message ---- >Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:19:28 -0500 >From: "Yao-Ying Chien chieny _ msu.edu" >Subject: CCL: water melting simulation >To: "Kalinichev, Andrey G " > >Sent to CCL by: Yao-Ying Chien [chieny!^!msu.edu] >Hi, > >I am interested in water melting simulation (from ice to water; (would >be nice if ) then water to ice). It must have been done extensively. I >did a quick search in SCI, but got (too) many returns. Read a few of >them, but could not pin point who are the first ones simulated water >melting successfully. Could you please point me the right keywords for >the literature search? Pointers to Review papers or Web sites are great! >Names of pioneers who failed but laid the foundation for others to >succeed are welcome too. > >A scientist I ran into 2 years ago at ACS meeting told me a Japanese >scientist has done it on supercomputer. Could you please tell me the >name of the Japanese scientist, or the year, to help me narrow down the >literature search? > >A scientist mentioned that MD can do it. Is that so? My intuition is >that some quantum level simulation may involve. > >Basically, I wish to see motion pictures when water melts (and hopefully >become ice again). How the 1st few ice molecules decide to break their >H-bonds to form a cluster of water molecules. And why do they break-- >does it require some form of "seed" in the neighborhood to initiate >the process? Does the same "seed" initiate the freezing as well? Any >evidences to support or against the observations (or the predictions) in >the simulations? > >Thanks, > >Yao-Ying Chien> > > -- Andrey Kalinichev e-mail: kalinich{at}uiuc.edu http://www.geology.uiuc.edu/~kalinich Phone: (217) 333-4389 From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 19:22:00 2005 From: "shoaleh dehghan sd268#%#georgetown.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Software to predict crystal structure(MOLPAC,DMAREL) Message-Id: <-29935-051110191410-26060-U+SVJjY7jCqa4B1UKx5tBw^-^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "shoaleh dehghan" Sent to CCL by: "shoaleh dehghan" [sd268*_*georgetown.edu] Dear CCLers, How can I download a version of MOLPAC, DMAREL or any other program for prediction of crystal structure? thank you very much for your help. Regards, Shoaleh Dehghan -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shoaleh Dehghan Postdoctoral fellow Department of Chemistry Georgetown University 37th and O Streets, NW Washington DC 20057 From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 19:56:01 2005 From: "Gardner, Elizabeth A. eagardner-,-utep.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: question on molecular orbitals in CO and NO Message-Id: <-29936-051110193332-19612-Je68ZFlBuSTYPl7uu8GMdQ]_[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Gardner, Elizabeth A." Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:46:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Gardner, Elizabeth A." [eagardner a utep.edu] I can try them on Gaussian 03W. What level of theory? Beth Elizabeth Gardner Assistant Professor Department of Chemistry University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, TX 79968 Phone: (915) 747-7551 Fax: (915) 747-5748 Office: 121D Physical Sciences Bldg. -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry**ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry**ccl.net] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:12 PM To: Gardner, Elizabeth A. Subject: CCL: question on molecular orbitals in CO and NO Sent to CCL by: Eric Scerri [scerri!^!chem.ucla.edu] In teaching qualitative molecular orbital theory one encounters the question of the crossing of the sigma 2p and pi 2p bonding orbitals in homonuclear diatomics. This is such that N2 has the pi orbitals of lower energy than sigma whereas for O2 the energies are reversed. But what about heteronuclear diatomics where each of the atoms ? The ordering given in general chemistry textbooks shows a wide variation. See for example Oxtoby, Zumdahl or Olmsted and Williams, all three of which contradict each other. Herzberg's, Spectra of Diatomic Molecules specifically states the configurations of CO and NO. For CO the ordering is as in the case of N2 whereas for NO the ordering is as in O2. However Herzberg's book is now a little out of date (1950). Do more recent calculations on these two molecules suggest anything different? Would anyone be prepared to run these calculations and tell me the results? How about experimental evidence such as PES on CO and NO? regards, eric scerrihttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Nov 10 20:45:01 2005 From: "shoaleh dehghan shoalehd\a/yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Software to predict crystal structure(MOLPAC,DMAREL) Message-Id: <-29937-051110201121-12627-fCXFnLaGUOcxVY3OwlqzjQ * server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: shoaleh dehghan Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1654175072-1131667874=:60506" Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:11:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: shoaleh dehghan [shoalehd[A]yahoo.com] --0-1654175072-1131667874=:60506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Dear CCLers, How can I download a version of MOLPAC, DMAREL or any other program for prediction of crystal structure? thank you very much for your help. Regards, Shoaleh Dehghan Shoaleh Dehghan Postdoctoral fellow Department of Chemistry Georgetown University 37th and O Streets, NW Washington DC 20057 --------------------------------- Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. --0-1654175072-1131667874=:60506 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dear CCLers,

How can I download a version of MOLPAC, DMAREL or any other program for
prediction of crystal structure?
thank you very much for your help.

Regards,

Shoaleh Dehghan


Shoaleh Dehghan
Postdoctoral fellow
Department of Chemistry
Georgetown University
37th and O Streets, NW
Washington DC 20057


Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. --0-1654175072-1131667874=:60506--