From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Aug 4 07:07:00 2007 From: "Joseph M Leonard jleonard42-x-gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Freezing Atoms Message-Id: <-34876-070804001425-12816-jShlJeYtnjKXGtLCg6zBpQ^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Joseph M Leonard" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 23:12:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Joseph M Leonard" [jleonard42===gmail.com] Can you determine whether the frozen atoms move relative to each other? I forget whether freezing them means to keep them at the same world coordinates as the input file or whether it's merely "don't use them in the calculation". If the molecule's reoriented, the frozen atoms have to move in the latter case... If this is a molecule you can release externally, send it to support and see what they say. In mechanics, it would be a quick calculation... Joe On 8/3/07, Sina T reli sinatureli:_:gmail.com wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Sina T reli" [sinatureli|gmail.com] > Hello, > > I have a problem with freezing atoms in spartan. When I freeze them and perform molecular mechanics calculations, the frozen atoms move all around. I am sure that none of the atoms overlap with each other or are in extreme proximities... (Someone told me that, it could have happened due to unacceptable placement of atoms). I am afraid that it might do the same thing with SE calculations too so before moving to SE calculations I want to fix this problem and understand why it happens. I hope you can help me with this matter... Also is there any other program where we can freeze atoms and do SE calculations? Thanks> > > > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Aug 4 12:22:00 2007 From: "John McKelvey jmmckel**gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Intel quad core processors Message-Id: <-34877-070804115956-2634-NH8x1V7EVdyEWGFmzTqLiw~~server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "John McKelvey" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_79804_3989228.1186236354106" Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 10:05:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "John McKelvey" [jmmckel|gmail.com] ------=_Part_79804_3989228.1186236354106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, Has anyone tried Intel quad core processors? Opinions? Thanks! John McKelvey ------=_Part_79804_3989228.1186236354106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello,

Has anyone tried Intel quad core processors?  Opinions?

Thanks!

John McKelvey
------=_Part_79804_3989228.1186236354106-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Aug 4 13:46:00 2007 From: "Rick Venable venabler*_*nhlbi.nih.gov" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Intel quad core processors Message-Id: <-34878-070804134314-14619-jlUltBETU9GHygd08cKpDQ() server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Rick Venable Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3269079763_532861" Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 13:42:43 -0400 Mime-version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Rick Venable [venabler_+_nhlbi.nih.gov] > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3269079763_532861 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable I don=B9t have numbers, and may not be able to provide them, but a couple scientists in our lab ran some benchmarks with both MD (CHARMM) and ab initio codes (Q-chem, GAMESS). The results led to choosing the Intel =8CClovertown=B9 processors for our new set of cluster nodes over dual core Opteron. I was told the QM codes in particular performed well, which influenced the choice. Price/performance and available hardware supporting a high bandwidth interconnect (InfiniBand in this case) were factors in the decision as well. The AMD Barcelona processor was not yet available, and we had to meet budge= t deadlines ... --=20 Rick Venable 29/500 Membrane Biophysics Section NIH/NHLBI Lab. of Computational Biology Bethesda, MD 20892-8014 U.S.A. (301) 496-1905 venabler AT nhlbi*nih*gov On 8/4/07 10:05 AM, "John McKelvey jmmckel**gmail.com" wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Has anyone tried Intel quad core processors? Opinions? >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > John McKelvey >=20 --B_3269079763_532861 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: CCL: Intel quad core processors I don’t have num= bers, and may not be able to provide them, but a couple scientists in our la= b ran some benchmarks with both MD (CHARMM) and ab initio codes (Q-chem, GAM= ESS).  The results led to choosing the Intel ‘Clovertown’ p= rocessors for our new set of cluster nodes over dual core Opteron. I was tol= d the QM codes in particular performed well, which influenced the choice. &n= bsp;Price/performance and available hardware supporting a high bandwidth int= erconnect (InfiniBand in this case) were factors in the decision as well.
The AMD Barcelona processor was not yet available, and we had to meet budge= t deadlines ...

--
Rick Venable        29/500
Membrane Biophysics Section
NIH/NHLBI Lab. of Computational Biology
Bethesda, MD  20892-8014   U.S.A.
(301) 496-1905   venabler AT nhlbi*nih*gov


On 8/4/07 10:05 AM, "John McKelvey jmmckel**gmail.com" <owner-= chemistry\a/ccl.net> wrote:

Hello,

Has anyone tried Intel quad core processors?  Opinions?

Thanks!

John McKelvey




--B_3269079763_532861-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Aug 4 18:20:00 2007 From: "Dave Hose anthrax_brothers_+_hotmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Freezing Atoms Message-Id: <-34879-070804181828-30062-eDAy5arUVRUdMo0s1jdFiw^_^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Dave Hose" Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 18:18:25 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Dave Hose" [anthrax_brothers~!~hotmail.com] Have you checked the "Subject To: Frozen Atoms" box in the calculations set up dialogue box? You may have marked the atoms as frozen in the GUI, but the calculation will ignore these frozen atoms unless told otherwise. Regards, Dave. >Hello, > >I have a problem with freezing atoms in spartan. When I freeze them and perform >molecular mechanics calculations, the frozen atoms move all around. I am sure >that none of the atoms overlap with each other or are in extreme proximities... >(Someone told me that, it could have happened due to unacceptable placement of >atoms). I am afraid that it might do the same thing with SE calculations too so >before moving to SE calculations I want to fix this problem and understand why >it happens. I hope you can help me with this matter... Also is there any other >program where we can freeze atoms and do SE calculations? Thanks From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Aug 4 19:41:00 2007 From: "Roi Baer roi.baer[]huji.ac.il" To: CCL Subject: CCL: 2007 Gentner Symposium: Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory Message-Id: <-34880-070804192054-24472-7jb4iJb3bU5U1Mj7msU9vw|*|server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Roi Baer" Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 19:20:50 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Roi Baer" [roi.baer||huji.ac.il] Dear Colleagues, It is our pleasure to announce the forthcoming 2007 Minerva-Gentner Symposium on: "Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory and Applications" (see our website: http://www.fh.huji.ac.il/symposium). SCOPE Many of the fundamental processes in nature involve intricate dynamics of electrons in materials under complex circumstances. Time dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) is emerging as one of the most practical and accurate theoretical approaches for studying such systems. The success of TDDFT stems from an advantageous combination of rigor (being based on a formally exact theory of interacting many-body quantum systems) and simplicity (circumventing the full many-body wave function). The existing approximations involved in the practical application of TDDFT have already proven that the method is of great utility. However, there are still open problems, phenomena which are not properly described or understood. The purpose of the symposium is to discuss the latest developments in time-dependent density functional theory, its implementation and its applications. The participants will focus on: Open theoretical problems challenging TDDFT approaches Methods of solution, in particular new functionals and approaches New implementations Novel/unique applications of TDDFT IMPORTANT DATES October 1, 2007 Deadline for Submission of Abstracts October 30, 2007 Notification of Acceptance of Abstracts November 1, 2007 Deadline for Registration December 16 - 21, 2007 The 2007 Minerva-Gentner Symposium Invited Speakers: N. Argaman; E. Gross; D. Neuhauser; G. Seifert;M. Baer; O. Hod; T. Niehaus, D. Tannor, Y. Band, R. Kosloff, A. Nitzan, I. Tokatly, D. Bauer, D. J. Kouri, E. Pehlke, C. Ullrich, K. Burke, L. Kronik, O. Prezhdo, R. van Leeuwen, E. Carter, A. Krylov, P.-G. Reinhard, G. Vignale, M. di Ventra, S. Kmmel, A. Rubio, K. Yabana, B. Dunietz, S. Kurth, P. Saalfrank, W. Yang, F. Evers, Y. Kurzweil, A. Savin, A. Grling, J. Martin, J. Schirmer, S. Grimme, Y. Meir, G. Scuseria, SITE INFORMATION The symposium will take place at the Hilton Queen of Sheba Hotel in Eilat, Israel, overlooking Israel's Red Sea Riviera, between December 16-21, 2007. Located by the beach, with the blue waters of the Red Sea on its front and the Red Mountains of the Edom and the Negev on its surrounding, this luxury site includes a spa and swimming pool, where one can enjoy constant sun and mild winter temperatures (max. ~22C). Eilat, Israel's southernmost city, can be accessed directly by commercial flights. A world-class series of speakers have already confirmed their prospective participation in the symposium. We look forward to welcoming you as well to this cutting-edge event, in this exciting location. For further details, see our website: http://www.fh.huji.ac.il/symposium The Organizing Committee: Roi Baer (The Hebrew University Jerusalem) Andreas Goerling (Universitt Erlangen) Eberhard K.U. Gross (Freie Universitt Berlin) Leeor Kronik (The Weizmann Institute of Science) Eran Rabani (Tel Aviv University) From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Aug 4 23:29:00 2007 From: "Yousef Sharifi ysharifi=gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: number of unpaird electron Message-Id: <-34881-070804232134-11797-uafE97op/TVUn4U1s3BiuA+/-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Yousef Sharifi" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_32758_11704679.1186284073135" Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 23:21:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Yousef Sharifi" [ysharifi]~[gmail.com] ------=_Part_32758_11704679.1186284073135 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Is there anyway to estimate the number of unpaired electron for a priodic structure like Fe100? Thanks ------=_Part_32758_11704679.1186284073135 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Is there anyway to estimate the number of unpaired electron for a priodic structure like Fe100? 
 
Thanks
 
 

 
------=_Part_32758_11704679.1186284073135--