From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 11 04:52:01 2011 From: "Gonzalo Jimenez Oses gonzalo.jimenez(a)unirioja.es" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Residue annotation in MOZYME Message-Id: <-45239-110811044953-25365-rJgIw2zR/3KJ03w7m2ylcQ _ server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Gonzalo Jimenez Oses" Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 04:49:50 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Gonzalo Jimenez Oses" [gonzalo.jimenez^-^unirioja.es] Dear all, I have observed that MOPAC overrides the residue labels specified in the PDB files when they are used as inputs for MOZYME. For example, a Pro can be automatically changed into a Val after reading the PDB input. This has terrible consequences for the global charge computation. Of course, one can fix the carge manually, but this is not very convenient when processing dozens of PDB files in batch mode. The cause of these changes is very slight deviations from the "ideal" residue geometry (I have overriden this bug by just changing the XYZ coordinates of just one atom of the conflictive Pro). So, my question is: given that the residue labels are already specified in the PDB file, is there any way to override the automatic re-tagging of the residues before any MOZYME calculation? I have checked the documentation, but have not found anything. Thanks a lot, best regards, Gonzalo From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 11 06:56:00 2011 From: "sana_gul-x-iccs.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Regarding Electrostatic potential calculation Message-Id: <-45240-110811060653-14704-cyn5crIZaOSk0BpA6k/20w!=!server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: sana_gul_._iccs.edu Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:06:25 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: sana_gul[#]iccs.edu Hello, First you have to make file i.e. com (format) either by using openbabel or g03 and then this filename.com will be used as input to calculate ESP from g03 and you can use this command g03 filename.com Regards > Dear all, > I wanted calculate electrostatic potentials of each atom in a > molecule using G03. Can anybody send me the keyword for calculating ESP > using CHelp algorithm in gaussian. > > > Thank you in advance. > > With regards, > Ravi Kumar V. > IISc > India. > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 11 07:31:00 2011 From: "Vladimir Chupakhin chupvl[A]gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: models to predict small molecule fluorescence, publications? Message-Id: <-45241-110810132240-11580-APXAUPT2ISiNCRvfz8GO2A]*[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Vladimir Chupakhin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd48ebe90c1ab04aa29ec32 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:22:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Vladimir Chupakhin [chupvl|,|gmail.com] --000e0cd48ebe90c1ab04aa29ec32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello, try to search smthing like bodipy + fluorescence + prediction. But to my knowledge the fluorescence prediction is quit a task even with QM gives poor results. Using chemoinformatics (QSPR) you can gain the good models with similar compounds, but probably will totally fail with external test sets of noncongeneric compounds. *Vladimir Chupakhin*, *Postdoc at joint project between* *Chemoinformatics laboratory and* *Structural Chemogenomics group* *University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France* * * On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:03 PM, James Thomas Metz James.Metz^_^Abbott.com < owner-chemistry\a/ccl.net> wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "James Thomas Metz" [James.Metz+/-Abbott.com] > CCL, > > Can someone direct me to any publications describing models to predict > small molecule fluorescence using cheminformatics-type approaches i.e., > pattern recognition of aromatic rings or substructures which have a high > probability > of fluorescence. > > I am trying to avoid QM or semi-empirical approaches, if possible. > > Alternatively, if someone is aware of databases of compounds which have > been > tested for fluorescence and contain positives and negatives that would be > excellent. I have access to software that would allow me to construct > in-house > models given enough quality data. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Jim Metz > Abbott Laboratories> > > --000e0cd48ebe90c1ab04aa29ec32 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

try to search smthing like bodipy + fl= uorescence + prediction. But to my=C2=A0knowledge=C2=A0the=C2=A0fluorescenc= e prediction is quit a task even with QM gives poor results. Using chemoinf= ormatics (QSPR) you can gain the good models with similar compounds, but pr= obably will totally fail with external test sets of noncongeneric compounds= .
Vladimir Chupakhin,
Postdoc at joint project = between
Chemoinformatics laboratory and
S= tructural Chemogenomics group
University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

<= /i>



On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:03 PM, James T= homas Metz James.Metz^_^Abbott.com <owner-chemistry\a/ccl.net> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Sent to CCL by: "James Thomas Metz" [James.Metz+/-Abbott.com]
CCL,

Can someone direct me to any publications describing models to predict smal= l molecule fluorescence using cheminformatics-type approaches i.e., pattern= recognition of aromatic rings or substructures which have a high probabili= ty
of fluorescence.

I am trying to avoid QM or semi-empirical approaches, if possible.

Alternatively, if someone is aware of databases of compounds which have bee= n
tested for fluorescence and contain positives and negatives that would be e= xcellent. =C2=A0I have access to software that would allow me to construct = in-house
models given enough quality data.

Thank you.

Regards,
Jim Metz
Abbott Laboratories



-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-=
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY\a/ccl.n= et or use:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message=

E-mail to administrators: CHEM= ISTRY-REQUEST\a/ccl.net or use
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message=

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.n= et/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/co= nferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0
http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/



--000e0cd48ebe90c1ab04aa29ec32-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 11 13:23:00 2011 From: "Y. Yuan echemistry##yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Chrawler - Chemistry Crawler for personal computers Message-Id: <-45242-110811070343-2436-WH7Wy0qVOtcaqKHrypIjew]*[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Y. Yuan" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1720492613-1313060615=:62297" Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 04:03:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Y. Yuan" [echemistry::yahoo.com] --0-1720492613-1313060615=:62297 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all,=0A=0AWe pre-launched a new product for chemists called Chrawler (= Chemistry Crawler,=A0http://www.chrawler.com=A0), which crawls chemical str= uctures from files and emails on your computers, and make them searchable. = =A0Both the crawling and searching are very fast.=A0=0A=0APlease download i= t and give it a try, and send us your feedbacks (one-month free trial licen= se is included):=A0http://www.scilligence.com/web/download.aspx?prod=3DOLN.= Chrawler=0A=0AThe price for Chrawler will be $99USD.=0A=0ASorry for duplica= ted posting.=0A=0A=0ATony Yuan=0A --0-1720492613-1313060615=:62297 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear all,

We pre-launched a new prod= uct for chemists called Chrawler (Chemistry Crawlerhttp://= www.chrawler.com ), which crawls chemical structures from f= iles and emails on your computers, and make them searchable.  Both the= crawling and searching are very fast. 

Pleas= e download it and give it a try, and send us your feedbacks (one-month free= trial license is included): http://www.scilligence.com/web/download= .aspx?prod=3DOLN.Chrawler

The price for Chrawl= er will be $99USD.

Sorry for duplicated posting.


Tony Yuan

=
--0-1720492613-1313060615=:62297-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 11 14:17:00 2011 From: "Victor Rosas Garcia rosas.victor]_[gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: SUMMARY: dft for radicals? Message-Id: <-45243-110811131054-16584-z+iFeiTVYejnAKsY47p+yA]-[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Victor Rosas Garcia Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:10:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Victor Rosas Garcia [rosas.victor[A]gmail.com] Hello everybody, Well, it's been a week since I posted my question and it lools like no more replies are coming by. The original question was: I'm looking for a functional suitable for radicals (phenoxy type) for the calculation of bond dissociation energies and spin densities. So far my library search has not turned up much. Of course, I have found a ton of dft studies on radicals, but no review that discusses the relative merits of different functionals for this kind of calculation. Can anyone point to a review of this kind? Thanks to (in no particular order): William McDonald, for his paper where he shows that "the pbe0 functional with C-PCM solvent predicts very accurate O-H bond dissociation energies for carefully constructed isodesmic reactions involving phenoxyl radicals. See J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 6409–6425 (doi: 10.1021/jp909574v)" Alcides Simao, for pointing out the paper Bernardi, Fernando, Andrea Bottoni, and Marco Garavelli. “Exploring Organic Chemistry with DFT: Radical, Organo‐metallic, and Bio‐organic Applications.” Quantitative Structure‐Activity Relationships 21, no. 2 (July 1, 2002): 128-148. Tobias Schwabe, for pointing out the GMTKN30 benchmark set, located at http://toc.uni-muenster.de/GMTKN/GMTKN30/RSE43.html, indicating that self-interaction is a serious problem in aromatic radicals and suggesting double-hybrids for these. Lars Goerick, for recommending "a look at some of Leo Radoms recent publications (of the last 2-3 years) on RSEs and BDEs. The Radom group also comes to the conclusion that double-hybrids work particularly well for radicals." All these amounts to A LOT of reading so, I have not decided yet on what functional to use, but I'm getting there. Have a nice day! Victor