From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Oct 17 11:47:00 2020
From: "Joseph Leonard jleonard42+*+gmail.com" <owner-chemistry],[server.ccl.net>
To: CCL
Subject: CCL: Torsion space forcefield minimization
Message-Id: <-54188-201017112107-29684-fUQoG0NQjZnvwa9iUGCCNQ],[server.ccl.net>
X-Original-From: Joseph Leonard <jleonard42 . gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d5453305b1df6d0c"
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:20:51 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0


Sent to CCL by: Joseph Leonard [jleonard42%%gmail.com]
--000000000000d5453305b1df6d0c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Folks, is anybody aware of a program that offers torsion-space minimization
(no bond length/angle change) of one or two/paired molecules?  I was aware
of commercial offerings they did this long ago and I wondered whether it
have become (more) available. Pointers welcome!

Joe Leonard
--=20
--
But if biology were the reason so few women are in coding, it would be
impossible to explain why women were so prominent in the early years of
American programming, when the work could be, if anything, far harder than
today=E2=80=99s programming.  It was an uncharted new field, in which you h=
ad to do
math in binary and hexadecimal formats, and there were no helpful internet
forums, no Google to query, for assistance with your bug.  It was just your
brain in a jar, solving hellish problems.

--000000000000d5453305b1df6d0c
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">Folks, is anybody aware of a program that offers torsion-=
space minimization (no bond length/angle change) of one or two/paired molec=
ules?=C2=A0 I was aware of commercial offerings they did this long ago and =
I wondered whether it have become (more) available. Pointers welcome!</div>=
<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Joe Leonard</div>-- <br><div =
dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature"><d=
iv dir=3D"ltr">--<br><div><div>But if biology were the reason so few women =
are in coding, it would be impossible to explain why women were so prominen=
t in the early years of American programming, when the work could be, if an=
ything, far harder than today=E2=80=99s programming.=C2=A0 It was an unchar=
ted new field, in which you had to do math in binary and hexadecimal format=
s, and there were no helpful internet forums, no Google to query, for assis=
tance with your bug.=C2=A0 It was just your brain in a jar, solving hellish=
 problems.</div></div></div></div>

--000000000000d5453305b1df6d0c--