From ipcakc@vigyan.ernet.in  Tue Dec 14 05:55:40 1993
Received: from relay1.UU.NET  for ipcakc@vigyan.ernet.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id FAA20463; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 05:49:13 -0500
Received: from spool.uu.net (via LOCALHOST) by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA21129; Tue, 14 Dec 93 05:49:11 -0500
Received: from sangam.UUCP by uucp5.uu.net with UUCP/RMAIL
	(queueing-rmail) id 054715.9756; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 05:47:15 EST
Received: from vigyan.UUCP by sangam.ncst.ernet.in (4.1/SMI-4.2-ERNET-relay) with UUCP 
	id AA13710; Tue, 14 Dec 93 14:56:25+0530
Received: by iisc.ernet.in (ERNET-IISc/AT&T UNIX SYS V.3.2)
	id AA25377; Tue, 14 Dec 93 14:28:07 EST
Received: by vigyan.iisc.ernet.in (smail2.3)
	id AA07589; 14 Dec 93 14:15:00 EST (Tue)
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: valence bond
Date: 14 Dec 93 14:15:00 EST (Tue)
From: ipcakc@vigyan.iisc.ernet.in
Message-Id: <9312141415.AA07589@vigyan.iisc.ernet.in>



Hello netters,

Can any one please help me in writing valence bond structures for
the systems of the type A-----H-----B (where A and B are not Hydrogens
and can be any element)(in other words, I am looking into the hydrogen
transfer reactions) at the reactant, transition state and product
states.

The reaction is   A  + H--B ------> A--H + B (A and B are radicals)

One more request is that how to calculate the energies and the
corresponding coefficients for each and every Valence bond structure
in the total wave function which is a l.c. of all the valence bond
structures.  Please suggest a good text book or a review article
that helps me more in this matter.

Thanks to all in advance.


Sridhar 
Department of Inorganic and Physical Chemistry
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560 012 . India.

e-mail : ipcakc@ipc.iisc.ernet.in

Ps: The reactions can either be symmetric (A=B) or non-symmetric(A.ne.B)


From scsupham@reading.ac.uk  Tue Dec 14 08:55:42 1993
Received: from susssys1.rdg.ac.uk  for scsupham@reading.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id HAA21282; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 07:59:45 -0500
From: <scsupham@reading.ac.uk>
Received: from reading.ac.uk by susssys1.reading.ac.uk with SMTP (PP) 
          id <28648-0@susssys1.reading.ac.uk>; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 12:59:10 +0000
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 93 12:59:06 GMT
Message-Id: <3511.9312141259@scsscsc3>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: FENSKE-HALL methods: what are they ??
Cc: scsupham@reading.ac.uk
Content-Type: X-sun-attachment


----------
X-Sun-Data-Type: text
X-Sun-Data-Description: text
X-Sun-Data-Name: text
X-Sun-Content-Lines: 12

Dear All,
        Can someone either explain or refer me to a review which
explains Fenske-Hall MO calculations. How does this method
contrast with other related methods and what are its pros and cons ?

Thanks for any help.

 john upham
 
John Upham, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Reading, Berks., RG6 2AD, UK.
Email: scsupham%reading.ac.uk@uk.ac (BITnet), scsupham@uk.ac.reading (Janet)
Voice:   +44 734 875123 x7441 (day), Fax: +44 734 311610
----------
X-Sun-Data-Type: default
X-Sun-Data-Description: default
X-Sun-Data-Name: .signature
X-Sun-Content-Lines: 3

John Upham, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Reading, Berks., RG6 2AD, UK.
Email: scsupham%reading.ac.uk@uk.ac (BITnet), scsupham@uk.ac.reading (Janet)
Voice:   +44 734 875123 x7441 (day), Fax: +44 734 311610

From mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au Mon Dec 13 21:18:11 1993
Received: from uniwa.uwa.edu.au  for mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id VAA17837; Mon, 13 Dec 1993 21:18:09 -0500
Received: from graf.crystal.uwa.edu.au (graf.crystal.uwa.edu.au [130.95.232.1]) by uniwa.uwa.edu.au (8.6.4/8.6.2) with SMTP id KAA02213 for <chemistry-request@ccl.net>; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 10:18:07 +0800
Received: from hewl.crystal.uwa.edu.au by graf.crystal.uwa.edu.au with SMTP (5.61+IDA+MU)
	id AA01058; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 10:48:03 +0800
From: mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au (Magda Wajrak)
Message-Id: <9312140220.AA22357@hewl.crystal.uwa.edu.au>
Subject: G92 problem?
To: chemistry-request@ccl.net
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 93 10:20:19 WST
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
Status: RO



Dear G92 users,


I am having problems with running G92 job. The job involves firstly
optimizing a geometry using MP2 theory (MP2=Full) with a general basis set
of DZP quality and then using --Link-- to take the optimizated geometry and
do a frequency calculation on this geometry. The first part of the job runs
alright, but when the frequency job starts, after SCF calculation I get the
following error and job collapses:

"File extend in NtrExt1 failed. "

My input file is as follows:


$ RunGauss
%chk=test
#P mp2=full/gen 6d SCFConv=6 opt optcyc=100 

MP2 geometry optimization 

0 1
Z-Matrix here

Basis set here
****

--Link1--
$ RunGauss
%chk=test
#P mp2=full/gen 6d freq geom=checkpoint guess=check

MP2 frequency job 

0 1

Basis set here
****

What is happening, is my input wrong? But I did a test with h2o molecule
and it worked alright.


Magda Wajrak
(Ph.D. student)

University of Western Australia
email:  mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au


From mrigank@imtech.ernet.in  Tue Dec 14 10:55:53 1993
Received: from relay2.UU.NET  for mrigank@imtech.ernet.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id KAA18699; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 10:48:10 -0500
Received: from spool.uu.net (via LOCALHOST) by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA08015; Tue, 14 Dec 93 10:48:08 -0500
Received: from sangam.UUCP by uucp5.uu.net with UUCP/RMAIL
	(queueing-rmail) id 104650.357; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 10:46:50 EST
Received: by sangam.ncst.ernet.in (4.1/SMI-4.2-ERNET-relay) with UUCP 
	id AA11699; Tue, 14 Dec 93 21:04:22+0530
Received: from imtech.UUCP by ern.doe.ernet.in (4.1/SMI-4.1-MHS-7.0)
	id AA20379; Mon, 13 Dec 93 02:45:36+0530
Message-Id: <9312122115.AA20379@ern.doe.ernet.in>
Received: by imtech.ernet.in (DECUS UUCP w/Smail);
          Fri, 10 Dec 93 10:08:45 +0530
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 93 10:08:45 +0530
From: "Dr. Mrigank" <mrigank@imtech.ernet.in>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Help on books ?
X-Vms-Mail-To: CHEM,MRIGANK     


Hi every one!

I am reccomanding these books/journasl for library. We need to know the prices
and publishers/distributers name. I could not locate the same in here and we do
not have good information system here accessible. Could anyone help. I have
included the publishers name whereever possible but prices are must. 

                                ** The list **
``Reviews in  Computational Chemistry''  by  Lipkowitz and  Boyd,Vol I-V.

``Quantum Mechanics'', 4th ed by Ira N. Levine,                        

``A Handbook of Computational Chemistry'', by Tim Clark;

``Molecular Mechanics, ACS Monograph 177'', by Ulrich Burkert and  Norman   L.
Allinger   pub.  American   Chemical   Society, Washington, D.C., 1982. 

``Computational Chemistry Using the PC'', By Donald Rodgers, VCH, 1991. 

``Conformational  Properties  of  Macromolecules''  by A. Hopfinger Academic
press, 

``Computer Software Applications in Chemistry'' by Peter C. Jurs. 

``Genetic Algorithms  In Search,  Optimization And Machine Lerning'',(1989)  by
D.E.  Goldberg,  Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, USA. 

``Adaptation In  Natural And Artificial Systems'' (1975) by J.H.Holland,
University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. 

``Simulated Annealing  and Boltzman  Machines'' (1989) by E. Aarts and J. Korst
by John Wiley & Sons, New York. 

``Handbook of  Genetic Algorithms''  (1991) by  L.Davis Van Nostrand Reinhold,
New York. 

``Molecular Simulations of Liquids'' 

AND a few journals 

  Journal of Chemical Educatuon

  Journal of Computational Chemistry

  Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics

Thanks in advance
Mrigank
----
Dr. Mrigank                       \/Phone  +91 172 45004 x216
Institute of Microbial Technology /\Email:  mrigank@imtech.ernet.in
P O Box 1304, Sector 39A          \/UUCP:...!uunet!sangam!vikram!imtech!mrigank
Chandigarh 160 014 India.         /\ 
==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+
-- Science does not have a country, but Scientist has one - L. Pasteur

From CUNDARIT@MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU  Tue Dec 14 11:00:38 1993
Received: from msuvx1.memst.edu  for CUNDARIT@MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id JAA02927; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 09:58:29 -0500
Received: from MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU by MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU (PMDF V4.2-14 #3869) id
 <01H6GQ03LXDS8WXG63@MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU>; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 08:59:42 CST
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 08:59:42 -0600 (CST)
From: CUNDARIT@MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU
Subject: Fenske-Hall methods
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01H6GQ03NJ8Y8WXG63@MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU>
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Hi,

	The Fenske-Hall method is perhaps closest in spirit to Extended
Huckel.  Given our interests its biggest advantage is its applicability
to transition metal complexes.  Classic refs. are given below.  

	MB Hall, RF Fenske Inorg. Chem. 1972, 11, 768.
	BE Bursten, RF Fenske J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 67, 3138.  
	BE Bursten, RJ Jensen, RF Fenske J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 68, 3320.

	On the applications side, there is in addition to the work of
Hall and Bursten, really nice work by Lichtenberger on correlating photo-
electron spectral data with Fenske-Hall calculations.  I also recall seeing 
some work out of Cotton's group on the study of metal-metal bonded systems in
which Fenske-Hall calculations were integrated into the experimental analysis.

     Another big advantage to Fenske-Hall, in my opinion, is that like 
Extended Huckel it is SIMPLE and thus easily intepretable.  This makes it great
as an introduction to comp chem for undegrads and grad students.  The program
also has Z-matrix input, which may confound students the first time they 
see it, but once they get the hang of it, it beats calculating Cartesians
by hand.  In our introductory graduate class in structure and bonding at
Memphis State we have found it to be quite popular in the computational
exercises.  Given my bent, one of the nice things is that the students can also
gain exposure to computational inorganic chemistry, and thus makes a fine 
follow-on to simple Huckel methods.

	On the negative side, I would imagine that like Extended Huckel
methods there is the likelihood that calculating geometries is probably
going to be difficult.  As Hoffmann's work with EHT shows, if some
geometry is determined by a symmetry argument a simple approach is quite
informative; there is no reason to think that Fenske-Hall wouldn't also be 
useful in such a case.  A series of test calculations where there is some
corroborative experimental data would be well advised.  We have not done any 
prediction of geometries with FH, and if anybody on the net has any data on 
this I would be interested in hearing about it.

	On the research side, we have found that the method is quite
good at reproducing the composition of molecular orbitals (when compared
to our effective core potential calculations).  We have just finished 
a collaborative project with Jim Mayer at Washington and found the 
Fenske-Hall to be a useful adjunct to more sophisticated ECP calculations.
One particularly neat feature is the ability to decompose MOs from an 
AO basis to a fragment MO basis.  In fact, we would run Fenske-Hall calcs using
the fragment MO analysis on geometries optimized using our regular effective 
core potential methods in order to help guide us in analysis of the ECP wave-
functions. This feature is really useful when looking at organometallic 
complexes of the transition metals (as compared to traditional Werner-type 
complexes) since organometallics tend to show more delocalization of the
frontier MOs over the metals and ligands the bonding picture.

	Hope this helps.

					Sincerely,

					Tom Cundari
					Dept. of Chemistry
					Computational Inorganic Chemistry Lab
					Memphis State University
					Memphis, TN 38152
					phone: 901-678-2629
					fax: 901-678-3447

From EDWARDSP@vax.edinboro.edu  Tue Dec 14 11:55:48 1993
Received: from tetra.vax.edinboro.edu  for EDWARDSP@vax.edinboro.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id LAA24728; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 11:20:55 -0500
Received: from vax.edinboro.edu by vax.edinboro.edu (PMDF V4.2-11 #2652) id
 <01H6GURGBCBK94DTBA@vax.edinboro.edu>; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 11:18:47 EDT
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 11:18:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Dr. Paul Edwards" <EDWARDSP@vax.edinboro.edu>
Subject: Re: Fenske-Hall methods
To: CUNDARIT@MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01H6GURGBLYQ94DTBA@vax.edinboro.edu>
X-VMS-To: IN%"CUNDARIT@MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU"
X-VMS-Cc: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT



Is Fenske-Hall software available from an ftp site?

Paul Edwards
Edinboro University of PA
edwardsp@vax.edinboro.edu


From gerson@vnet.IBM.COM  Tue Dec 14 13:56:01 1993
Received: from vnet.IBM.COM  for gerson@vnet.IBM.COM
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id NAA03327; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 13:48:31 -0500
From: <gerson@vnet.IBM.COM>
Message-Id: <199312141848.NAA03327@www.ccl.net>
Received: from DALVMIC1.VNET.IBM.COM by vnet.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 0947; Tue, 14 Dec 93 13:48:08 EST
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 93 13:48:08 EST
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Version of Gromos for UNIX


From: Dennis J. Gerson, Ph.D.
      Technical and Marketing Support  Chemical Sciences
      ---------------------------------------------------
Subject: Version of Gromos for UNIX
Does anyone know of a version of Gromos (molecular dynamics code) that
runs on UNIX?  If so, can you please include the contact for obtaining
the code.

Please respond directly to my internet id so the CHEMISTRY mail-list
does not get overloaded.

Thanks, Dennis Gerson

---------------------------------------------------------------
IBM POWER Parallel Systems Group    |Tele:(214)280-1425 Fax:1486
1507 LBJ Freeway MS/160601          |IBMLINK: USIB5MSK @ IBMMAIL
Dallas TX 75234  USA                |Email: gerson@vnet.ibm.com

From davide@stinch0.csmtbo.mi.cnr.it  Tue Dec 14 14:00:11 1993
Received: from stinch0.csmtbo.mi.cnr.it  for davide@stinch0.csmtbo.mi.cnr.it
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id NAA03080; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 13:03:30 -0500
From: <davide@stinch0.csmtbo.mi.cnr.it>
Received: by stinch0.csmtbo.mi.cnr.it (911016.SGI/911001.SGI)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA04788; Tue, 14 Dec 93 18:46:15 GMT
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 93 18:46:15 GMT
Message-Id: <9312141846.AA04788@stinch0.csmtbo.mi.cnr.it>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Fenske-Hall and Extended Huckel



Hi,

I fully agree with the description of Tom Cundari and I would like to
add this enlightening paper :

Bruce E. Bursten

" Some comments on approximate LCAO molecular orbital theory
in organometallic chemistry: Getting more by doing less?

Pure & Applied Chemistry, 1991, (61) 839-844

I do not know about the availabilty of  Fenske-Hall program
... but I know of an Extended Huckel one : CACAO
(The input file format is already included in BABEL)

I hope this helps

Sincerely,
                         Davide



.\

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Davide M. Proserpio - Istituto di Chimica Strutturistica Inorganica
Universita' di Milano,   Via Venezian, 21 -  20133  Milano,   Italy
phone +39-2-70635120 fax 70635288 - davide@stinch0.csmtbo.mi.cnr.it
-------------------------------------------------------------------


From cqsimpson@halnet.com  Tue Dec 14 14:56:02 1993
Received: from interlock.halnet.com  for cqsimpson@halnet.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id OAA04048; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 14:50:16 -0500
Received: by interlock.halnet.com id AA08277
  (InterLock SMTP Gateway 1.1 for chemistry@ccl.net);
  Tue, 14 Dec 1993 13:50:11 -0600
Received: by interlock.halnet.com (Internal Mail Agent-1);
  Tue, 14 Dec 1993 13:50:11 -0600
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 13:49:33 -0600
From: cqsimpson@halnet.com (Charlie Simpson)
Message-Id: <9312141949.AA21979@cre2>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Fenske-Hall Program


Netters:

Professor Michael B. Hall, Texas A&M University, is the one to contact to
obtain a copy of the Fenske-Hall program.  If you're interested, his e-mail
address is hall@chemvx.tamu.edu.  He's still department head there, so I
wouldn't flood him with requests for the program all at once though.

I'll put my $0.02 in as well and reiterate what everyone else has said about
the program.  Speaking with the bias of a former student, the program is
excellent for organo-metallics and inorganic compounds.  It is also well
maintained and updated.  If any of you have the latest from Cache, FH is in
there, or use to be.

Cordially,

================================================================================
	Charlie Simpson Ph.D.			cqsimpson@halnet.com
	Halliburton Energy Services
	P.O. Box 1431				Phone 405/251-4564
	Duncan, OK 73536-0438			Fax   405/251-3218


 When one's expectations [for life] are reduced to zero, one really
 appreciates everything one does have.

				Dr. Stephen Hawking
				Omni, Feb. '79
================================================================================

From rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu  Tue Dec 14 15:55:47 1993
Received: from dax.cc.uakron.edu  for rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id PAA04925; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 15:44:45 -0500
Received: from atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu by dax.cc.uakron.edu (5.65/Ultrix4.3)
	id AA09816; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 15:44:27 -0500
Received: from cronus.chemistry.uakron.edu by atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA11040; Tue, 14 Dec 93 15:47:36 EST
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 93 15:47:36 EST
From: rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu (Rovshan G. Sadygov)
Message-Id: <9312142047.AA11040@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Summary: Excimer calculations



Dear Netters,

sometimes ago I've posted a quiestion about excimer calculations using 
INDO1/s - CI method as coded in ARGUS and/or ZINDO. Thanks to all of you
who responded. The following is the summary of answers I received
From d3f012@pellucidar.pnl.gov Mon Nov 22 21:21:09 1993
From: d3f012@pellucidar.pnl.gov
Subject: Re:  Excimer Calculations
To: rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu
Cc: d3f012@pellucidar.pnl.gov
X-Envelope-To: rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu

Rovshan,

I have used Argus in the past to calculate eximers for a
bacteriochlorophyll project.  It's not a user-defined
feature of the export version, but if there is sufficient
interest, I could try to get it into the next version.

Could you explain to me exactly what you want to do?



Mark


**************************************************************************
Mark A. Thompson                    
Sr. Research Scientist              email:  d3f012@pnlg.pnl.gov
Molecular Science Research Center   FAX  :  509-375-6631
Pacific Northwest Laboratory        voice:  509-375-6734
PO Box 999, Mail Stop K1-90
Richland, WA.  99352

Argus available via anonymous ftp from pnlg.pnl.gov (130.20.64.11) (in the
argus directory).  Download the README file first.

Disclaimer:  The views expressed in this message are solely my own and
             do not represent Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific 
             Northwest Laboratory, or any of its clients.
**************************************************************************


From SATYAM@vms.cis.pitt.edu Mon Nov 22 22:44:37 1993
From: SATYAM@vms.cis.pitt.edu
Subject: Re: Excimer Calculations
To: rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu
X-Envelope-To: rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.EDU
X-Vms-To: IN%"rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.EDU"

I would be interested in obtaining a copy of responses you receive
Thanks
satyam
satyam@vms.cis.pitt.edu





From cmartin@rainbow.uchicago.edu Mon Nov 22 22:46:56 1993
From: cmartin@rainbow.uchicago.edu (Charles Martin)
Subject: Re: Excimer Calculations
To: rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu (Rovshan G. Sadygov)
Cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2060      

>
Netters,
>
Rovshan G Sadygov asks:
>
> Does anyone out there know of programs to calculate excimers? I have tried
> Argus and MOPAC5. They do not seem to give satisfactory results for the
> problem. Preferably code for Sun workstations and written on C.
> 
I am just curious what the problem is?

Some old calculations have been performed
to model the excimer bond. 
See "Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry,"
Lowry and Richardson, Chapter 12  Photochemistry, which references
1a) Th. F\"orster, Angwew. Chem. Int. Ed., vol 8, page 333, (1969)
1b)B. Stevens in Advances in Photochemistry, vol 8
W. A. Noyes, G. S. Hammond, and J. N. Pitts, Jr. Eds, Wiley NY 1971, page 161
1c) M. Gordan and W. R. Ware, Eds,  "The Expliex"  Academic Press NY 1975

2) E.A. Chandross and C. J. Dempster, JACS vol 92, page 3586  (1970)

3) A.S. Cherkasov and T.M. Vember, Optics and Spectroscopy, vol 6, page 319 (1959)


Lowry and Richardson claim that Quantum Mechanical calculations
 (I don't know what kind)
give good esitmate of the theoretical position of the excimer flourescence
band (I don't now how "good" good is) if the calculations account for
charge resonance and excitatiojn resonance.  That is, if the excimer
takes the form:

	A*A <-> AA* <-> A+A- <-> A-A+

Is this along the lines of what you are looking for?

On the other hand, many excimer fluorescence intensity depend
on concentration. If you are trying to model concentration dependence,
take a look at some work by Peter Rosky (Texas at Austin?)
He has some been looking at some similar problems with excited
atoms in solution.


Hope this helps
Chuck

==================================================================
Charles H. Martin

email: chm6@quads.uchicago.edu

U.S. snail:
        c/o Freed Group
        The James Franck Institute and 
        The Department of Chemistry
        The University of Chicago
        5640 South Ellis Avenue
        Chicago, Illinois  60637

Work:  (312) 702-3457
Fax:   (312) 702-5863  
==================================================================


---Administrivia: This message is automatically appended by the mail exploder:
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- everyone     | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- coordinator
MAILSERV@ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY  | Gopher: www.ccl.net (coming soon)
Anon. ftp www.ccl.net     | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search




From blonski@alumina.rutgers.edu Mon Nov 22 23:57:35 1993
From: blonski@alumina.rutgers.edu (Slawomir Blonski)
Subject: Re: Excimer Calculations
To: rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu (Rovshan G. Sadygov)
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 912       

CI works well for excimers and is equivalent to combination of charge transfer
and excitation resonance. See, for example:

"Photophysics of Polystyrene. 2. Pariser-Parr-Pople Studies of Excimer
Structure"
S. Blonski, K. Sienicki, and A. Herman
Macromolecules 20 (1987) 329

and more recent references:

"Excimer geometries in bichromophoric molecules: a theoretical and experimental
study of 1,2-(bis-9-anthryl)-ethane"
G.D. Scholes, K.P. Ghiggino, and G.J. Wilson
Chemical Physics 155 (1991) 127

"Excimer interactions in poly(acenaphthalene) diads"
D.G. Scholes and K.P. Ghiggino
Chemical Physics Letters 188 (1992) 140

However, semi-empirical methods give good spectra or good geometries, but not
both, and excited-state ab initio calculations seem to be too costly so far.

I don't work on excimers now, but I am still very interested in the summary
of responds to the excimer question.

Slawomir Blonski

---Administrivia: This message is automatically appended by the mail exploder:
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- everyone     | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- coordinator
MAILSERV@ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY  | Gopher: www.ccl.net (coming soon)
Anon. ftp www.ccl.net     | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search





From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Nov 23 01:59:26 1993
Errors-To: jkl@ccl.net
From: <U6124673@ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Excimer Calculations
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
X-Vms-To: IN%"CHEMISTRY@ccl.net"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: chemistry-request@ccl.net
Errors-To: jkl@ccl.net
Precedence: bulk


Calculation of excimer emission wavelengths is a particularly
non-trivial exercise.
Ab initio calculations must employ extended basis sets and proper
inclusion of correlation - the emission maximum shift with
respect to that of the "monomer" should be fairly reliably calculated
in this way, but not necessarily the actual maximum.

For more practically-oriented calculations a modified version of
QCFF/PI (used in e.g. G.D. Scholes, K.P. Ghiggino & G.J. Wilson,
Chem. Phys., 155 (1991) 127) could be used.  You may obtain that
from me (just e-mail me personally).

Alternatively, what about CNDO/S/CI or INDO/S/CI - they should
also give reasonable results?

Regards
  Greg Scholes
  University of Melbourne

---Administrivia: This message is automatically appended by the mail exploder:
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- everyone     | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- coordinator
MAILSERV@ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY  | Gopher: www.ccl.net (coming soon)
Anon. ftp www.ccl.net     | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Nov 23 03:59:20 1993
Errors-To: jkl@ccl.net
From: <BALLY%CFRUNI52.BITNET@CEARN.cern.ch>
Subject:  Re: Excimer calculations
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
X-Original-To:  INTERBITGATE%CHEMISTRY@ccl.net, BALLY
Sender: chemistry-request@ccl.net
Errors-To: jkl@ccl.net
Precedence: bulk

Dear Netters,

  on his reply to the question concering calculation of excimer electronic
structure, Greg Scholes suggested to try CNDO and/or INDO/S-CI.

Although these procedures may look like an attractive choice, the one of them
which I know personally (INDO/S-CI such as implemented for example in Zerner's
ZINDO which is also offered in INSIGHT from Biosym) has one serious drawback
which probably makes it useless for excimers: It absurdly overestimates
through-space interactions at anything smaller than van der Waals distances.

We have been trying to do calculations on pi-complex cations (which may be
regarded as ionized excimers) and the splitting of the HOMO's and the LUMO's at
distances between 2.8 and 3.0 Angstrom (as may be typical also for pi-excimers)
were so large that the HOMO-LUMO-gap (or, conversely, the electronic transition
corresponding to HOMO-LUMO excitation) was predicted in the IR! At larger
distances, the picture becomes more realistic (for example, the splitting of
the pi-states in dodecahedradiene, where two double bonds are held at a 3.5
Angstom distance is predicted to be 0.8 eV in excellent agreement with
experiment).

Of course all this boils down to the choice of the geometry, in particular the
distance between the excimer components. We based our calculations on
geometries obtained at a correlated ab-initio level which we assume to be
reasonably realistic. Surely one could do an INDO/S calculation at some
distance where experimental excimer emission wavelengths are predicted
correctly but then the question poses itself whether we have gained any
understanding by doing this  calculation.

I think the only procedure which is liable to give correct results without any
fiddling is the CASPT2-model recently proposed by Roos et. al. and implemented
in their program system MOLCAS 2. However, anything with more than about ten
heavy atoms may take a lot of patience even with state-of-the art hardware and
the program is not of the black-box type because some human intelligence is
needed in the selection of the basis set and the active space for the MCSCF
calculation.

Therefore, I share the opinion of Greg Scholes that calculations of excimer
emissions are a non-trivial issue, but I am also waiting eagerly to hear what
other colleagues have to say on this matter

thomas bally

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Prof. Thomas Bally                    |  E-mail:  BALLY@CFRUNI52          |
|  Institute for Physical Chemistry      |                                   |
|  University of Fribourg                |  Tel:     011-41-37 826 489       |
|  Perolles                              |  FAX:     011-41-37 826 488       |
|  CH-1700 FRIBOURG                      |                                   |
|  Switzerland                           |                                   |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


---Administrivia: This message is automatically appended by the mail exploder:
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- everyone     | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- coordinator
MAILSERV@ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY  | Gopher: www.ccl.net (coming soon)
Anon. ftp www.ccl.net     | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search





From grzesb@asp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl Tue Nov 23 04:38:12 1993
From: grzesb@asp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl (Grzegorz Bakalarski)
To: rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu

Dear dr Sadygov
Y should not use MOPAC 5 for any C.I. calculation. The code is wrong
( simply). Try to use MOPAC 93 ( or MOPAC7 or last version of MOPAC 6
[about 6.7]). In addition MOPAC 6 ( 6.0 or 6.1) has also bugs in C.I.
calculations.
Best regards
Grzegorz

---Administrivia: This message is automatically appended by the mail exploder:
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- everyone     | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- coordinator
MAILSERV@ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY  | Gopher: www.ccl.net (coming soon)
Anon. ftp www.ccl.net     | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search




From AHOLDER@VAX1.UMKC.EDU Mon Nov 22 20:37:59 1993
From: Andy Holder <AHOLDER@VAX1.UMKC.EDU>
Subject: Excimers
To: rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu
X-Vms-To: IN%"rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT

The phrase "excimer calculations" covers a great deal of ground having 
to do with a variety of different possible combinations of methods.  
Which excimer?  Did you do it UHF or RHF, CI or MCSCF?  Which 
Hamiltomian?  What spin state did you specify?  What do you mean by
"do not seem to give satisfactory results for the problem"?  What 
information did you expect from the calculation?  These sorts of silly 
little questions will help us tell exactly waht you need.  You 
conclusion that ARGUS and MOPAC5 do not work is like saying "White paint 
doesn't work."  No context, no good answers.



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                              DR. ANDREW HOLDER
             Assistant Professor of Computational/Organic Chemistry

Department of Chemistry              ||  BITNET Addr:   AHOLDER@UMKCVAX1
University of Missouri - Kansas City ||  Internet Addr: aholder@vax1.umkc.edu
Spencer Chemistry, Room 315          ||  Phone Number:  (816) 235-2293
Kansas City, Missouri 64110          ||  FAX Number:    (816) 235-1717
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=





From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Nov 23 13:05:18 1993
Errors-To: jkl@ccl.net
From: rovshan@atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu (Rovshan G. Sadygov)
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Excimer details
Sender: chemistry-request@ccl.net
Errors-To: jkl@ccl.net
Precedence: bulk

  Hellow Dear Netters,

Yesterday I posted a quiestion about excimer calculations. Thanks for
interest it brought about from some of you. People asked about details
of calculations and objectives. They are following;

I want to calculate excimer states of naphthalene dimer in parallel
conformation using supermolecule model of dimer. I need to find out
dependence of total energy of supermolecule on interplanar distance between
naphthalene monomers. Excited state of supermolecule corressponding to
HOMO->LUMO transition supposedly forms bound state at interplanar distance
3.3 - 3.5 A.
I also need to calculate second excited state of supermolecule. This state
is expected to be nonbonding, laying about 2.0 ev above excimer state at
bonding conformation of latter and approaching it at large interplanar
distances.

I have now a problem somehow close to one described by Dr T Bally in his
E-mail reply. 
According to Argus INDO1/s calcualtions ground state of supermolecule is
not repulsive at interplanar distances 2.0 - 3.0 A. As a matter of fact it
is attractive(!!!). 
MOPAC5 with AM1 Hamiltonian yields quite resonable results for ground state
of supermolecule. It predicts vdWaals bonding at 5.5 A interplnar distance and
repulsive ground state at interplanar distance shorter than 4.0 A.
The second problem with Argus is that at short interplanar distances
molecular orbital carrying LUMO features (which is antibonding) becomes an 
occupied molecular orbital in ground state. And conversely, MO corresponding
to HOMO of monomer becomes unoccypied MO. It is true for MOPAC5 AM1 too.

So these are problems I currently encounter in excimer calculations. 
I'll be glad to provide more details if needed.
Thanks in advance to all who are interested.

Rovshan G Sadygov.

---Administrivia: This message is automatically appended by the mail exploder:
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- everyone     | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- coordinator
MAILSERV@ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY  | Gopher: www.ccl.net (coming soon)
Anon. ftp www.ccl.net     | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search



From yuan@picasso.ucsf.EDU  Tue Dec 14 20:55:50 1993
Received: from cgl.ucsf.EDU  for yuan@picasso.ucsf.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id UAA06545; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 20:25:24 -0500
From: <yuan@picasso.ucsf.EDU>
Received: from georgia.ucsf.edu by cgl.ucsf.EDU (8.6.4/GSC4.24)
	id RAA12182 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 17:25:22 -0800
Received: from localhost by georgia.ucsf.edu (8.6.4/GSC4.23)
	id RAA22548; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 17:25:20 -0800
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 17:25:20 -0800
Message-Id: <199312150125.RAA22548@georgia.ucsf.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: info for 1994 conferences
Cc: yuan@picasso.ucsf.EDU



Dear Netters,

I would like to get a list of 1994 conferences in molecular modeling.
Is there any anonymous FTP site that I can get informations about 1994 
conferences? I have tried anonymous-access FTP to CCSUN.UNICAMP.BR 
(FTP diectory of Medical Informations and Computing Conferences) but
failed.

I am a postdoc doing research on CADD (computer aided drug design) with 
DNA-Drug complex and would like to find out good conferences to present
my results in 1994.

I can summarize the answer if people are interested in the answers that I
received. Thanks for your time in advance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Yate-Ching Yuan
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry  Tel.      415-476-4378
Mail Stop 0446                          Fax       415-476-0688
University of California                internet: yuan@picasso.ucsf.edu 
San Francisco, CA 94143-0446            bitnet: yuan@picasso.ucsf.edu.bitnet
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

From dave%@mel.dit.csiro.au  Tue Dec 14 22:55:51 1993
Received: from shark.mel.dit.csiro.au  for dave%@mel.dit.csiro.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id WAA07496; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 22:26:17 -0500
Received: from  ([138.194.40.144]) by shark.mel.dit.csiro.au with SMTP id AA26621
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4/DIT-1.3 for <chemistry@ccl.net>); Wed, 15 Dec 1993 14:25:54 +1100
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 93 14:26:15 EST
From: (Dr.) Dave Winkler <mercury.chem.csiro.au@mel.dit.csiro.au>
Subject: Re: info for 1994 conferences
To: <yuan@picasso.ucsf.EDU>, chminf-l@iubvm.ucs.indiana.edu, chemistry@ccl.net
X-Mailer: LeeMail 2.0.2
Message-Id: <A934CF08@>


>Dear Netters,
>
>I would like to get a list of 1994 conferences in molecular modeling.
>Is there any anonymous FTP site that I can get informations about 1994 
>conferences? I have tried anonymous-access FTP to CCSUN.UNICAMP.BR 
>(FTP diectory of Medical Informations and Computing Conferences) but
>failed.
>
>I am a postdoc doing research on CADD (computer aided drug design) with 
>DNA-Drug complex and would like to find out good conferences to present
>my results in 1994.
>

There is a Eurasia conference in Kuala Lumpur 17-21 December 1994.  It will have 
sessions on drug design and comp chem.  It is sponsored by the Federation of 
Asian Chemical Societies and the Federation of European Chemical Societies. 
(contact: IKM fax 60-3-7189909)  There are some lovely reorts nearby (eg the 
Sheraton on the island of Langkawi) for after the conference (I just came back 
from doing a similar thing!)

There is also an international molecular design meeting in Queensland Australia 
(near the Great barrier Reef) in mid 1995.  It will be sponsored by the US and 
European Molecular Graphics Societies (the 1994 meeting is in Chicago in July 
1994) and the Royal Australian Chemical Institute (contact: me or Peter Andrews: 
p.andrews@mailbox.uq.oz.au).  There is also the main European Structure-Activity 
meeting in Barcelona Sept 4-9 1994 (contact: QSAR10@IMIM.ES).  I went to the one 
last year in Strasbourg and thought it was pretty good.

Cheers,

Dave
__________________________________________________________________________

   Dr. David A. Winkler                        Voice: 61-3-542-2244      
   Principal Research Scientist                Fax:   61-3-543-8160      
   CSIRO Division of Chemicals and Polymers
   Private Bag 10       
   Clayton, Australia.

   "Life is what happens to you while you're making other plans"


