From h.rzepa@ic.ac.uk  Fri Jan 14 04:49:55 1994
Received: from punch.ic.ac.uk  for h.rzepa@ic.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id DAA28946; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 03:54:20 -0500
Received: from sg1.cc.ic.ac.uk by punch.ic.ac.uk with SMTP (PP) 
          id <15953-0@punch.ic.ac.uk>; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 08:51:14 +0000
Received: from macb.ch by cscmgb.cc.ic.ac.uk (920330.SGI/4.0) id AA25316;
          Fri, 14 Jan 94 08:52:58 GMT
Message-Id: <9401140852.AA25316@cscmgb.cc.ic.ac.uk>
X-Sender: rzepa@sg1.cc.ic.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 08:54:04 +0000
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
From: h.rzepa@ic.ac.uk (Henry Rzepa) (Henry Rzepa)
Subject: Re: semiempirical methods for hypervalent sulfur


Perhaps the papers pubished by Walter Thiel on MNDO-d should be
consulted.

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY 1993 VOL.14 NO.7 PP.775-789
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY 1993 VOL.14 NO.1 PP.37-44

TI: EXTENSION OF MNDO TO D-ORBITALS - PARAMETERS AND RESULTS FOR THE
          HALOGENS
      AU: THIEL_W, VOITYUK_AA
      JN: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY 1992 VOL.44 NO.5
          PP.807-829

EXTENSION OF THE MNDO FORMALISM TO D-ORBITALS - INTEGRAL
          APPROXIMATIONS AND PRELIMINARY NUMERICAL RESULTS
      AU: THIEL_W, VOITYUK_AA
      JN: THEORETICA CHIMICA ACTA 1992 VOL.81 NO.6 PP.391-404

I gather most of the problems regarding geometry etc are solved!


Dr Henry Rzepa, Dept. Chemistry, Imperial College, LONDON SW7 2AY;
rzepa@ic.ac.uk via Eudora 2.01, Tel:+44  71 225 8339, Fax:+44 71 589 3869.
>From April '94: (44) 171 584 5774, Fax: (44) 171 584 5804
http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa.html




From Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be  Fri Jan 14 05:49:59 1994
Received: from mserv.rug.ac.be  for Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id EAA29248; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 04:59:50 -0500
Received: from allserv.rug.ac.be by mserv.rug.ac.be with SMTP id AA03530
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>); Fri, 14 Jan 1994 10:59:18 +0100
Received: by allserv.rug.ac.be (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA11028; Fri, 14 Jan 94 10:56:52 +0100
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 10:56:51 +0100 (MET)
From: Patrick Bultinck <Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be>
Subject: What and where : CHARMM
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9401141040.A10197-0100000@allserv>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 434


Dear Netters,

Can anybody provide me some info on what the CHARMM package (program) is, 
where to get it, what the cost is, in what journal one can find info...?

The reason for interest is that CHARMM could be used to handle point 
charges with GAMESS.

thanks for answering !!!!

Patrick Bultinck
University of Ghent, Belgium
E_mail : Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be

   *** BUT COME ON HEISENBERG, YOU MUST BE SURE ABOUT SOMETHING ***

From dodik@yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il  Fri Jan 14 05:56:39 1994
Received: from shum.cc.huji.ac.il  for dodik@yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id FAA29394; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 05:16:15 -0500
Received: from yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il by shum.cc.huji.ac.il with SMTP id AA05859
  (5.65cHU/IDA-1.4.4 for <chemistry@ccl.net>); Fri, 14 Jan 1994 12:16:05 +0200
Received: by yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA31972; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 12:14:49 +0200
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 12:14:49 +0200
From: dodik@yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il (David Danovich)
Message-Id: <9401141014.AA31972@yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Parallel Gaussian


 Dear Netters,     

  We are thinking to purchase a parralel system of IBM RS 6000/590's (or anything 
comperable) to run Gaussian, and we need some good advice.
So I have the following questions:
1. where can we purchase the parallel Gaussian?
2. what computers is used for the parallel Gaussian. How many processors and can we used 
compute claster? 
3. What are the specifications like operation memory per processor?
4. what kind of software is used for the parallelization?
5. Has anybody experienced with parallel Gaussian?

   Thank you in advance      David Danovich 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                            Dr. David Danovich
             The Fritz Haber Research Center for Molecular Dynamics
             The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat-Ram Campus,
                           91904 Jerusalem, Israel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office phone: (972)-2-586934     Internet Addr: dodik@yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il
Home phone: (972)-2-789544       FAX number: (972)-2-585345
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+


From Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be  Fri Jan 14 06:02:52 1994
Received: from mserv.rug.ac.be  for Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id EAA29213; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 04:53:31 -0500
Received: from allserv.rug.ac.be by mserv.rug.ac.be with SMTP id AA03500
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>); Fri, 14 Jan 1994 10:53:13 +0100
Received: by allserv.rug.ac.be (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA10782; Fri, 14 Jan 94 10:50:47 +0100
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 10:50:46 +0100 (MET)
From: Patrick Bultinck <Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be>
Subject: Re: Optimizing Linear Structure in GAMESS
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <01H7K07H84R68WZPUN@MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9401141050.A10197-0100000@allserv>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 1475




On Tue, 11 Jan 1994 CHENS@memstvx1.memst.edu wrote:

> Dear Netters,
> 	I've been trying to optimize the geometry of two C2H2 molecules
> situated along a straight line with a certain fixed distance separating
> the two molecules (ie. H-C-C-H  H-C-C-H) using GAMESS program. The intent
> is to hold the four carbon atoms in a straight line with a fixed distance 
> between the two central carbon atoms and allow all the other parameters
> to be fully optimized. I tried using linear bends in the ZMAT group but
> the job terminated with a message "roundoff error in bends". Does anyone
> have any idea what the problem could be? Any comments will be appreciated.
> 
> S. Chen

Dear,

I use GAMESS quite often, and would like to help 
you with your optimization.
When I have to do something like that, I do not use linear bonds. 
Instead, I give in a Z-matrix, without any constraint...
I let the job take off for about 3 minutes, then I stop it.
I then have a look at the .log file.
In there you will find some lines with an encoded Z-matrix, you will see 
that coord. 1 equals this or that lenghth, angle or whatever.
Then I return to the input file, where I insert some IFREEZ groups in the 
$STATPT group, so I type IFREEZ(number of the coord. in the enc. Z-matrix 
that you want to keep unchanged)=1
Then you let the job do the job you consider as the job the job has to do.

Sincerely,
Bultinck Patrick
University of Ghent, Belgium
E-mail : Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be

From mvoue@cc.fundp.ac.be  Fri Jan 14 07:50:01 1994
Received: from quick  for mvoue@cc.fundp.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id HAA00191; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 07:13:18 -0500
Received: by cc.fundp.ac.be (MX V3.1A) id 12269; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 13:13:31 EST
Sender: mvoue@cc.fundp.ac.be
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 13:13:25 EST
From: mvoue@ccl.net
To: chemistry@ccl.net
CC: mvoue@ccl.net
Message-ID: <00978867.9B6055E0.12269@cc.fundp.ac.be>
Subject: TN3270


Dear netters,
Does a version of the communication program TN3270 exist for
VAX-VMS ?
Thanks ...
Michel Voue
University of NAMUR (Belgium)
E-Mail : mvoue@cc.fundp.ac.be

From vberckm@schs.uia.ac.be  Fri Jan 14 08:49:57 1994
Received: from schs.uia.ac.be  for vberckm@schs.uia.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id IAA00733; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 08:43:58 -0500
Received: from localhost by schs.uia.ac.be (8.6.4/Ultrix3.0-C)
	id OAA13371; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 14:42:50 +0100
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 14:42:49 +0100 (MET)
From: Filip Verberckmoes <vberckm@schs.uia.ac.be>
Subject: Compiling Rasmol on an IBM RS6000 ?
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-ID: <Pine.3.88.9401141412.A13348-0100000@schs.uia.ac.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear Netters,

We have downloaded RasMol2 for XWINDOWS, but we are having some problems
compiling it for an IBM RS6000, running AIX 3.2.5. These problems probably
arise from the fact that no one of us is familiar with compiling C-programs.

Is there someone, more experienced than we are, who has compiled Rasmol
for an IBM RS6000, that could provide us with a Makefile for this system.




                                                     Ilse Wolfs

                                                Department of Chemistry
                                                University of Antwerp (RUCA)
                                                Groenenborgerlaan 171
                                                2020 Antwerpen
                                                Belgium

                                                e-mail:iwolfs@banruc60.bitnet

From loh@akocoa.enet.dec.com Thu Jan 13 15:38:18 1994
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com  for loh@akocoa.enet.dec.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id PAA23092; Thu, 13 Jan 1994 15:38:16 -0500
Received: from us1rmc.bb.dec.com by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com (5.65/13Jan94)
	id AA06497; Thu, 13 Jan 94 12:30:28 -0800
Received: by us1rmc.bb.dec.com; id AA19224; Thu, 13 Jan 94 15:27:58 -0500
Message-Id: <9401132027.AA19224@us1rmc.bb.dec.com>
Received: from akocoa.enet; by us1rmc.enet; Thu, 13 Jan 94 15:30:14 EST
From: <loh@akocoa.enet.dec.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 94 15:30:14 EST
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Grant Program for ACS Satellite Seminar on Modeling for Drug Design




Digital Is Sponsoring Grants for ACS Satellite Seminar on "Molecular Modeling:  
  The Small Molecule Approach", 1:00PM to 4:00PM EST,  March 29, 1994
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Digital is offering 20 grants to universities and colleges to reduce 
the ACS viewing site fee to $500. (a savings of $600.; U.S. Price) for 
this satellite seminar on drug design modeling.

Contact Cyrelle Gerson (202)872-8728 [e-mail: ckg97@acs.org] or 
Carol Valverde (202) 872-6124 at ACS for more information on 
the grant program.

The three-hour satellite seminar will feature leading research experts 
who are developing new modeling techniques and are successfully putting
them to work solving practical problems in drug design research.
Organized by Dr. J. Phillip Bowen of the University of Georgia, the
seminar will include the following presentations:

-  Conceptual Framework for Drug Design, by Garland R. Marshall,
Director of the Center for Molecular Design and Professor of
Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Washington University

-  Molecular Modeling in the Design of Potent and Selective D1
Agonists, by Yvonne C. Martin, Senior Project Leader, Computer-
Assisted Molecular Design, Abbott Laboratories

-  Use of Pharmacophore Models in the Design of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate,
by Daniel F. Ortwine, Research Associate, Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical
Research Division, Warner-Lambert Company.

This seminar will also feature two panel discussions--a unique and
exciting opportunity to speak directly to the guest panelists and to
pose any questions you may have about pharmacophore modeling.




From shaoweng@helix.nih.gov  Fri Jan 14 11:50:06 1994
Received: from helix.nih.gov  for shaoweng@helix.nih.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id LAA02566; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 11:05:58 -0500
Received: from localhost by helix.nih.gov (8.6.4/1.35(helix-1.0))
	id LAA23702; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 11:05:55 -0500
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 11:05:55 -0500
From: shaoweng@helix.nih.gov (Shaomeng Wang)
Message-Id: <199401141605.LAA23702@helix.nih.gov>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Seeking help on AVS
Cc: shaoweng@helix.nih.gov



Dear Netters,

We are doing some gaussian calculations and we like to plot
the charge density maps and orbitals using the AVS program running on
the CONVEX machine. I will appreciate if  you can provide me some information
on how do to so, especially on the KEYWORDS we should use in
GAUSSIAN and MOPAC calculations to generate the right files to be
ead by the AVS program.

Thank you very much for you help.

-Shaomeng Wang


From ryszard@MSI.COM  Fri Jan 14 11:51:11 1994
Received: from schizoid.msi.com  for ryszard@MSI.COM
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id LAA02849; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 11:37:16 -0500
Received: from hogan.MSI.COM by schizoid.msi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA11398; Fri, 14 Jan 94 11:36:13 EST
Received: by hogan.MSI.COM (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA12177; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 11:36:27 -0500
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 11:36:27 -0500
From: ryszard@MSI.COM (Ryszard Czerminski X 285)
Message-Id: <9401141636.AA12177@hogan.MSI.COM>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net, Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be
Subject: Re:  What and where : CHARMM




CHARMM ( =  Chemistry at HARvard Macromolecular Mechanics )

The main reference is:

"CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization,
and Dynamics Calculations." J. Comp. Chem., Vol.  4, p187 (1983)

Since 1983 there have been numerous studies done using
CHARMM package and numerous papers published.

CHARMM is actively develped by numerous academic groups.

Please contact Molecular Simulations, Inc. (MSI) or
Prof. Martin Karplus at Harvard for information
about distribution.

MSI (USA): phone (617)229-9800; quanta-l@msi.com (mailing list)

There is also independent charmm-bbs: send message to
charmm-bbs-request@emperor.harvard.edu for subscription.

Ryszard Czerminski, MSI

From gene@jersey.cray.com  Fri Jan 14 11:51:58 1994
Received: from cray.com  for gene@jersey.cray.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id KAA02380; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 10:55:59 -0500
Received: from jersey.cray.com by cray.com (Bob mailer 1.2)
	id AA24563; Fri, 14 Jan 94 09:55:56 CST
Received: by jersey.cray.com
	id AA15015; 5.0/CRI-5.6; Fri, 14 Jan 94 10:55:47 EST
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 94 10:55:47 EST
From: gene@jersey.cray.com (Eugene Fleischmann)
Message-Id: <9401141555.AA15015@jersey.cray.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Cc: gene@jersey.cray.com
Subject: Re: Optimizing Linear Structure in GAMESS
Content-Length: 1813


> Dear Netters,
>     I've been trying to optimize the geometry of two C2H2 molecules
> situated along a straight line with a certain fixed distance separating
> the two molecules (ie. H-C-C-H  H-C-C-H) using GAMESS program. The intent
> is to hold the four carbon atoms in a straight line with a fixed distance 
> between the two central carbon atoms and allow all the other parameters
> to be fully optimized. I tried using linear bends in the ZMAT group but
> the job terminated with a message "roundoff error in bends". Does anyone
> have any idea what the problem could be? Any comments will be appreciated.
> 
> S. Chen


For the following geometry,

H3-C1-C2-H4 . . . H7-C5-C6-H8

Try the following Z-matrix, which worked just fine in MNDO93,

 6           0.00000   0         0.00000   0         0.00000   0     0     0     0 /
 6           1.20600   1         0.00000   0         0.00000   0     1     0     0 /
 1           0.97300   1       180.00000   0         0.00000   0     1     2     0 /
 6           6.53567   1         0.00000   0         0.00000   0     3     1     2 /
 6           1.20600   1       180.00000   0         0.00000   0     4     3     1 /
 1           0.97300   1       180.00000   0        90.00000   0     5     4     3 /
 1           0.97300   1       180.00000   0        90.00000   0     4     5     6 /
 1           0.97300   1       180.00000   0         0.00000   0     2     1     3 /

Notice that optimization is activated only for the bond stretches.

Good luck,

Gene


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
	Eugene D. Fleischmann, Ph.D.
	Computational Chemist
	Cray Research, Inc.		(609) 252-1250
	121 Commons Way			gene@calv2.cray.com
	Princeton, NJ  08540
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


From sam@ncsa.uiuc.edu  Fri Jan 14 14:50:02 1994
Received: from newton.ncsa.uiuc.edu  for sam@ncsa.uiuc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id NAA04858; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 13:53:31 -0500
Received: from landrew.ncsa.uiuc.edu by newton.ncsa.uiuc.edu with SMTP id AA26054
  (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2 for chemistry@ccl.net); Fri, 14 Jan 94 12:53:30 -0600
Received: by landrew.ncsa.uiuc.edu (4.1/NCSA-4.1)
	id AA02944; Fri, 14 Jan 94 12:53:28 CST
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 94 12:53:28 CST
From: sam@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Sam Milosevich)
Message-Id: <9401141853.AA02944@landrew.ncsa.uiuc.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re:  TN3270
Cc: mvoue@ccl.net


> From chemistry-request@ccl.net Fri Jan 14 07:37:59 1994
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 13:13:25 EST
> From: mvoue@ccl.net
> To: chemistry@ccl.net
> 
> Does a version of the communication program TN3270 exist for
> VAX-VMS ?

FYI -- TGV MULTINET will do it.

$ help multinet telnet /tn3270

MULTINET

  TELNET

    /TN3270

     /TN3270=tn3270-negotiation-mode
     /NOTN3270

      The /TN3270 qualifier allows the negotiation of IBM 3270 emulation
      mode.  The default, /TN3270=AUTOMATIC, causes TELNET to
      automatically negotiate IBM 3270 emulation mode with the foreign
      host.  If the foreign host supports IBM 3270 mode then TELNET
      automatically enters IBM 3270 emulation mode.  /TN3270=FORCE forces
      TELNET into IBM 3270 emulation mode when communicating with a
      machine that supports IBM 3270 mode, but which does not negotiate
      this mode in such a way that TELNET can automatically determine that
      IBM 3270 emulation mode is possible.  In particular, IBM 370 systems
      running the ACCESS/MVS TCP package seem to have this problem
      (requiring the use of /TN3270=FORCE).  The /NOTN3270 switch can be
      used to entirely disable IBM 3270 emulation mode negotiation.


@MULTINET MULTINET TELNET Subtopic?

From liang@chvymw.chem.ncsu.edu  Fri Jan 14 14:54:14 1994
Received: from chvymw  for liang@chvymw.chem.ncsu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id NAA04881; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 13:57:35 -0500
From: <liang@chvymw.chem.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199401141857.NAA04881@www.ccl.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 13:56:42 -0500
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Summary /search for review papers on parameterization of force fields
X-VMS-To: SMTP%"CHEMISTRY@ccl.net"



Summary /search for review papers on parameterization of force fields

Many thanks to those who responded to my query. Here goes the summary.
Weigen Liang



original posting:
From:	SMTP%"liang@chmwvy.chem.ncsu.edu" 11-JAN-1994 
Subj: search for review papers on parameterization of force fields

Dear netters,
  I'm searching recent literature for REVIEW papers of parameterization of 
force field in molecular modeling without much success. In some lucky cases I 
found papers reviewing a particular type of force field, i.e., MM3, DREDING, 
UFF, etc, but most of the time I just got papers dealing with a small series 
of molecules, even a single molecule. 
  Does anybody have a good lead to those papers which review (or invent)  
particular types of force fields, even the whole field of parameterization 
of force field in molecular modeling? I would appreciate it if you give me 
a clue, and if there are significant emails, I'll summarize them and post 
them to the list. 
Thanks.
Weigen Liang


Responses from dear netters


ff-1
From:	SMTP%"jxh@ibm12.biosym.com" 11-JAN-1994 12:37:06.74
Joerg-R. Hill

Look at:
1) The Consistent Force Field and Its Quantum Mechanical Extension, A. Warshel
   in: Semiempirical Methods of Electronic Structure Calculation, Part A:
   Techniques, (Modern Theoretical Chemistry 7), Ed. Gerald A. Segal, Plenum
   Press, New York and London, 1977, p. 133
2) Molecular Mechanics Force-Field Parameterization Procedures; A. J. Hopfinger,
   R. A. Pearlstein, J. Comp. Chem., 5 (1984) 486 - 499
3) Proximity effects on organic reactivity: Development of force fields from
   quantum chemical calculations, and applications to the study of organic
   reaction rates; Andrea E. Dorigo, K. N. Houk in: Advances in Molecular
   Modeling, vol. 1, JAI Press Inc., 1988, p. 135
4) Derivation of force fields for molecular mechanics and dynamics from ab
   initio energy surfaces; J. R. Maple, U. Dinur, A. T. Hagler, Proc. Natl.
   Acad. Sci. USA, 85 (1988) 5350
5) J. R. Maple, T. S. Thatcher, U. Dinur, A. T. Hagler; Chemical Design
   Automation News 5, 9 (1990) 10



ff-2
From:	SMTP%"shenkin@still3.chem.columbia.edu" 11-JAN-1994 12:40:18.33
Peter S. Shenkin

Well, you could go to the original AMBER, MM2, MM3 or OPLSA papers.

Also, there's still good stuff in Burkert & Allinger, "Molecular
Mechanics" (ACS Monograph 177), which would be a good place to start.



ff-3
From:	SMTP%"kim@sfu.ca" 11-JAN-1994 13:37:34.38
Chan-Kyung Kim

    Prof. Wolfe published series of papers in the Canadian Journal of Chemistry,
66, 2687 - 2750 (1988). In these papers, he developed MMP2 parameters for 
peptides and penicillins.



ff-4
From:	SMTP%"wk01189@worldlink.com" 11-JAN-1994 13:46:58.75
Max Vasquez

        The november 93 issue (No. 7) of Chemical Reviews is dedicated to
molecular mechanics and modeling.  Unfortunately, Arnie Hagler's contribution
did not make it in time for that issue: it was(is) a review of current force
field methodology.  Still you may find some of the other articles quite
useful.  Also, there are two recent papers in JACS "inventing" new force
fields, and at the same time presenting a brief overview (not really a
review) of other force fields (at least the major references are given).
These are:
(1) Amodeo & Barone JACS 114, 9085-9093 (1992)
(2) Halgren JACS 114, 7827-7843 (1992)

Attempts to compare force fields seem to run into controversy; see for example
the discussion in J.Biomol.Struct.Dynamics 8, 1103-1111 (1991) between 
Kollman's and Scheraga's groups regarding force fields for biomolecules.


I hope this helps.  In any case, keep you eyes open for Hagler's paper in
Chem.Rev. to appear sometime soon.


ff-5
From:	SMTP%"tudor@wucmd.wustl.edu" 11-JAN-1994 15:58:13.71
Tudor-Ionel Oprea

one of such paper series, but without comprehensive examples,
is generated by JG Vinter and colleagues, concerning the 
COSMIC force field and molecular modelling package.
Three papers i have in mind, all published in JCAMD,
Vinter et al, JCAMD 1:31-51 - about COSMIC
Abraham, Haworth JCAMD 2:125-135 - about the Morse potential
Morley et al, JCAMD 5:475-504 - about COSMIC(90)

these papers reflect the evolution of a good force field
(as compared to others), that is based on a simple philosophy:
keep atom types to a minimum (only 26 at types)
compare that with 200 for CHARMm and ilk
(bare in mind it is a general organic ff, so metals should
be not counted)

Enjoy the papers - most of the times you will find that they
are well written!


ff-6
From:	SMTP%"cletner@remcure.bmb.wright.edu" 14-JAN-1994 08:54:35.07
Charles Letner

These are the paper on AMDER development, united and all-atom versions. 
Good for info on the actual parameterization.
1) Weiner & Kollman, J. Comp. Chem., Vol. 7, No. 2 230-252 (1986)
2) Weiner, et al., JACS, Vol 106, No. 3 (1984)

These are comparisons of some of the "bio" fields.
1) Hall & Pavitt, J. Comp. Chem., Vol. 5 No. 5, 441-450 (1984)
2) Whitlow & Teeter, JACS, 108, 7163-7172 (1986)
3) Kini & Evans, J. Biomol. Str. & Dyn., Vol. 9, No.3 475-488 (1991)
	also same authors and journal Vol 10, No. 2 265-279 (1992)

Next two are sort of interesting.  The first on comes down on AMBER and
CHARMM force fields; says that they may lead to totally false results. 
The second one is a response.  Note the authors here. ;)
1) Roterman, Gibson, & Scheraga,  J. Biomol. Struct. & Dyn, Vol. 7, No. 3
391-453 (1989).  Actually two paper in a series
2) Kollman & Dill, J. Biomol. Struct. & Dyn., Vol 8., No. 5, 1103-1107 (1991)



ff-7
From:	SMTP%"Jeffrey.Nauss@UC.Edu" 11-JAN-1994 18:05:50.78
Jeff Nauss

I am interested in whatever references you may come up with.  In the
meantime, here are some that might help with the CVFF forcefield used
by Biosym:

Maple et al. PNAS 85, 5350 (1988)
Hagler et al. JACS 101, 5131 (1979)
Hagler et al. JACS 101, 5122 (1979)
Lifson et al. JACS 101, 5111 (1979)

Then there is:

Stouch et al. J. Comp Chem 12, 1033 (1991)
Williams & Stouch, J. Comp Chem 14, 1066 (1993)



ff-8
From:	SMTP%"tracy@austin.unimelb.edu.au" 12-JAN-1994 01:16:53.72
Tracy Nero


Here are a couple of refs for you. I hope they help. If I come across
more (which I know I have at home) I'll mail them to you.

COMFA see J. Med. Chem.,1993, vol 36, 70-80
Tripos force field see J. Comp. Chem.,1989, vol 10, 982-1012
Molecular Mechanics , ACS Monograph, 1982, page 177 U. Burkert and N.L.Allinger
AMBER force field see J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, vol 106, 765-
                      J. Comp. Chem., 1986, vol 7, 230-


ff-9
From:	SMTP%"mercie@med.cornell.edu" 12-JAN-1994 08:33:43.53
gus mercier


In the QCPE bulletin v. 12 no. 1 1992 p.6-11 there is an extensive
bibliography of MM2 parameters.

mercie@cumc.cornell.edu


end of file


From jkl@ccl.net  Fri Jan 14 15:50:02 1994
Received: from krakow.ccl.net  for jkl@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id OAA05446; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 14:57:17 -0500
From: Jan Labanowski <jkl@ccl.net>
Received: from localhost  for jkl@ccl.net
	by krakow.ccl.net (8.6.4/920428.1525) id OAA24921; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 14:57:17 -0500
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 14:57:17 -0500
Message-Id: <199401141957.OAA24921@krakow.ccl.net>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: contents/abstracts of journals available
Cc: jkl@ccl.net


Dear Netters,

Thanks to Springer-Verlag and Wiley, we have the contents of the following
premiere journals dealing with computational chemistry:

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry   (J. Wiley & Sons) (Cont+Abstracts)
Journal of Computational Chemistry           (J. Wiley & Sons) (Cont+Abstracts)
Theoretica Chimica Acta                      (Springer-Verlag) (Contents only)

They are available in the directory /pub/chemistry/periodicals in CCL archives
on the www.ccl.net and are updated as new issues are being published.

We should all be very thankful to Springer-Verlag and Wiley publishers for
providing this information to us free of charge. If you know any other
publishers who would be willing to place such information in our archives
let me know and let them know. I am willing to store it !!!

You can access CCL archives via e-mail, ftp or gopher. To find out
more about the Computational Chemistry Archives send the following message:
   select chemistry
   help chemistry
   help search
   help
   quit
to the address MAILSERV@ccl.net and the information will be forwarded to
your mailbox automatically.

There is a small change in the gopher on www.ccl.net if you go to it
via default port 70. You need to click on the:
      Other OSC Gopher Servers
and then on
      OSC Chemistry Gopher Server
to get to CCL archives. You can go directly to the CCL archives by using:
    gopher www.ccl.net 73

Have a good weekend. 

Jan Labanowski
CCL Coordinator
jkl@ccl.net


From d3f012@pellucidar.pnl.gov  Fri Jan 14 18:50:08 1994
Received: from pnlg.pnl.gov  for d3f012@pellucidar.pnl.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id RAA07658; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 17:51:18 -0500
From: <d3f012@pellucidar.pnl.gov>
Received: from pellucidar.pnl.gov (130.20.182.74) by pnlg.pnl.gov; Fri, 14 Jan
 94 14:46 PST
Received: by pellucidar.pnl.gov (920330.SGI/920502.SGI) for
 @pnlg.pnl.gov:chemistry@ccl.net id AA22915; Fri, 14 Jan 94 14:45:54 -0800
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 94 14:45:54 -0800
Subject: Geometry issues for semiempirical methods
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Cc: d3f012@pellucidar.pnl.gov
Message-id: <9401142245.AA22915@pellucidar.pnl.gov>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@ccl.net



Semiempirical methods, specifically MNDO/AM1/PM3, do rather poorly on
calculated rotational barriers for molecules such as 1,2-Dihaloalkanes,
1,2-Dimethoxyethane, and even ethane itself.  Usually the rotational
barrier between syn-trans is underestimated by as much as 50%.

Has anyone else documented this sort of problem (I presume this problem
is fairly well known).

Is anyone working on (or published) modified model Hamiltonians that
can treat this issue?  

I wonder how SAM1, Walter Thiel's new MNDO method, or SINDO might
treat this...any thoughts?

I'd be happy to summarize if you email directly to me.

Mark Thompson


ps.  There is a recent paper on 1,2-Dihaloalkanes by Dave Dixon and
coworkers that discusses this issue.  (J. Phys. Chem. vol 96, p 10740,
1992).





**************************************************************************
Mark A. Thompson                    
Sr. Research Scientist              email:  d3f012@pnlg.pnl.gov
Molecular Science Research Center   FAX  :  509-375-6631
Pacific Northwest Laboratory        voice:  509-375-6734
PO Box 999, Mail Stop K1-90
Richland, WA.  99352

Argus available via anonymous ftp from pnlg.pnl.gov (130.20.64.11) (in the
argus directory).  Download the README file first.
**************************************************************************


From AHOLDER@VAX1.UMKC.EDU  Fri Jan 14 18:53:20 1994
Received: from VAX1.UMKC.EDU  for AHOLDER@VAX1.UMKC.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id SAA07793; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 18:24:03 -0500
From: <AHOLDER@VAX1.UMKC.EDU>
Received: from VAX1.UMKC.EDU by VAX1.UMKC.EDU (PMDF V4.2-11 #4431) id
 <01H7OILUQAKG9M24DA@VAX1.UMKC.EDU>; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 17:22:59 CST
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 17:22:59 -0600 (CST)
Subject: rvgloss@arcriba.edu.ar
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-id: <01H7OILUSFQA9M24DA@VAX1.UMKC.EDU>
X-VMS-To: IN%"CHEMISTRY@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Hello Netters.

Daniel Glossman asked some interesting questions about hypervalent 
sulfur species computed by semiempirical methods.  It's an excellent 
question in that none of the "mainline" (i.e. Dewar-style) methods up 
til the recent advent of SAM1 has included an explicit treatment of 
d-orbitals.  This precluded the old standard sp3d2 hybridization 
pattern that we all know from Cootn and Wilkinson.  It was shown how-
ever that successful results could be obtained within this limitation
in a method using Gaussian corrections to the core-core replusion
term in the approximation (PM3 : J. J. P. Stewart, J. Comput. Chem.  
10, 221 (1989);  AM1 : M. J. S. Dewar,  Y.-C. Yuan, Inorg. Chem.  29, 
3881 (1990)).  MNDO's performance was substantially poorer than AM1 
or PM3, especially for hypervalent systems.

Which brings us to an intertesting question:  Is it really sp3d2 hybrid-
ization or are the d-orbitlas used as some sort of extra flexibility
(polarization?)?  This has been bandied about for quite some time.  A rel-
atively definitive article (A. E. Reed,  P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Am. Chem. 
Soc. 112, 1434 (1990)) seems to suggest that its not d-orbitals, but d-
functions.  I tend to come down in this camp myself.  Anyway, whether
or not its "orbital" or "function" it seesm that computationally they 
are needed for a proper description of these systems.

Next:  How do sp only semiempirical methods treat these systems?  Answer:
Badly and non-systematically.  It is my belief that the hypervalent 
systems that AM1 or PM3 might get correct are fortuitous.  Basically, I
would not trust these results for anything important.  To really
get these systems, we need d-functions/orbitals in the description.
TA DA:  SAM1 to the rescue.  Michael Dewar has been working over a 
period of some 8 years I know of on a way to bring d-orbitals into semi-
empirical theory.  This was accomplished with the new SAM1 method
(M. J. S. Dewar, C. Jie,  G. Yu, Tetrahedron  23, 5003 (1993);
A. J. Holder, R. D. Dennington,  C. Jie, Tetrahedron  in press, 
(1994)).  Here in Kansas City we have finished up the sulfur param-
eterization with SAM1 and the results for hypervalent systems are much
better.  (All of this will be published shortly.  This is not meant
to be a stall, as we are still working on some of this.  SAM1 with sulfur
will be available in AMPAC 5.0 from Semichem to be released in March
at the ACS meeting in San Diego.)  There is some selected data below
to illustrate the point.

SF4
---
                       SAM1       Exptl

Heat of Formation    -179.5      -182.4
SF(1)                  1.53        1.54
SF(2)                  1.68        1.65
FSF(1)                128.8       129.2
FSF(2)                 96.7        93.4
Ioniz. Pot.           12.55       12.03

General Results for Sulfur with SAM1
------------------------------------
(The following are unsigned average errors.)

                                  SAM1      AM1         PM3
Heat of Formation (76 molecs)     6.45      7.09        9.33
Dipole Moments (45 molecs)        0.40      0.49        0.59
Ioniz. Pot. (67 molecs)           0.39      0.33        0.39

The results for P are even more dramatic, with the average errors in
heats of formation being HALVED over PM3 and AM1!

As well as hypervalent heavy main group elements, we are working on 
transition metals and hope to have iron and copper available in the
5.0 release as well.  Hope this wasn't too boring.  And YES, Doug,
I'm always listening.  You'll get 5.0 when its ready and you can repeat
the study you mentioned with SAM1.

Cheerio,  Andy Holder


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                              DR. ANDREW HOLDER
             Assistant Professor of Computational/Organic Chemistry
Department of Chemistry              ||  BITNET Addr:   AHOLDER@UMKCVAX1
University of Missouri - Kansas City ||  Internet Addr: aholder@vax1.umkc.edu
Spencer Chemistry, Room 315          ||  Phone Number:  (816) 235-2293
Kansas City, Missouri 64110          ||  FAX Number:    (816) 235-5502
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From SHAUN%JASON.DECNET@relay.the.net  Fri Jan 14 23:50:07 1994
Received: from nic.the.net  for SHAUN%JASON.DECNET@relay.the.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id XAA08929; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 23:29:26 -0500
Received: from decnet-mail (SHAUN@JASON) by nic.the.net (PMDF V4.2-14 #4544) id
 <01H7OT7OY9SW000187@nic.the.net>; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 22:29:22 CDT
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 22:29:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Shaun D. Black" <SHAUN%JASON.DECNET@relay.the.net>
Subject: Help with TPPI COSY NMR expeiments
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01H7OT7OYBOI000187@nic.the.net>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: THENIC::IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Is anyone willing to offer a brief description of the TPPI COSY and TPPI 
Relay COSY NMR experiments.  I'm familiar with a variety of NMR techniques, 
but these are new ones to me.  Thanks in advance.  Cheers, Shaun
  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 
  = Shaun D. Black, PhD     | Internet:  shaun%jason.decnet@relay.the.net = 
  = Dept. of Biochemistry   | University of Texas Health Center, at Tyler = 
  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 

