From mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au  Fri Jan 21 02:51:50 1994
Received: from uniwa.uwa.edu.au  for mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id CAA03778; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 02:41:25 -0500
Received: from graf.crystal.uwa.edu.au (graf.crystal.uwa.edu.au [130.95.232.1]) by uniwa.uwa.edu.au (8.6.4/8.6.4) with SMTP id PAA08277 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 15:41:15 +0800
Received: from pack.crystal.uwa.edu.au by graf.crystal.uwa.edu.au with SMTP (5.61+IDA+MU)
	id AA11908; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 16:18:06 +0800
From: mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au (Magda Wajrak)
Message-Id: <9401210732.AA19598@pack.crystal.uwa.edu.au>
Subject: DFT and FREQ?
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 94 15:32:46 WST
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


Hello,

I just wanted to ask, if anyone could tell me how good is the DFT method in
calculating vibrational frequencies. I am particularly interested in its
performance for open-shell molecules. 
I have been recently told that open shell MP2 frequencies are not very good,
and so I have decided to try DFT.  Has anyone done any such calculations?

Any comments will be appreciated.

Thank you very much.


Magda Wajrak

(mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au)

From CHUCK@psipsy.uct.ac.za  Fri Jan 21 03:51:50 1994
Received: from ucthpx.uct.ac.za  for CHUCK@psipsy.uct.ac.za
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id DAA03986; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 03:40:42 -0500
Received: by ucthpx.uct.ac.za (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.8)
	id m0pNHPa-0001FQC; Fri, 21 Jan 94 10:40 SAST
Received: From NFSTEST/WORKQ3 by charongw3.uct.ac.za
          via Charon-4.0A-VROOM with IPX id 100.940121104136.256;
          21 Jan 94 10:42:40 -0200
Message-ID: <MAILQUEUE-101.940121103621.384@psipsy.uct.ac.za>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: "Marais, Charles F. "  <CHUCK@psipsy.uct.ac.za>
Date:         Fri, 21 Jan 1994 10:36:21 SAST-2
Subject:      N-H..N(S) H-BONDS AND SEMI EMPIRICAL MO
Priority: normal
X-mailer:     WinPMail v1.0 (R1)


Hi All

I would appreciate some info and references on the suitability of 
AM1, PM3, Zindo and other semi-empirical methods for the 
calculation of H-bond energies and vibrational frequencies for 
N-H..N and N-H..S  hydrogen bonds.

We have a molecule which switches from one to the other, giving 
rise to two clearly separate N-H stretching frequencies.  What we 
want is to calculate positions for the hydrogens which reproduce 
the difference between the stretching frequencies, and possibly 
the position of the bands as well.
How feasible is this ?

Thanks in advance

Charles

Dr Charles Marais


Department of Chemistry
University of Cape Town
Private Bag
Rondebosch                                  chuck@uctvax.uct.ac.za
South Africa 7700                           chuck@psipsy.uct.ac.za
------------------------------------------------------------------

















From DREGIA@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu  Fri Jan 21 10:51:55 1994
Received: from kcgl1  for DREGIA@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id KAA06513; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 10:45:51 -0500
Received: from kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu by kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu (PMDF
 V4.2-12 #3557) id <01H7XWQ4R6J4DFAJEW@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu>; Fri,
 21 Jan 1994 10:45:46 EST
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 1994 10:45:46 -0500 (EST)
From: "Suliman A. Dregia" <DREGIA@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Subject: ORTEP for DOS?
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-id: <01H7XWQ4RPTUDFAJEW@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu>
X-VMS-To: IN%"CHEMISTRY@ccl.net"
X-VMS-Cc: DREGIA
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT




Dear folks:

Is there a version of ORTEP that runs on DOS? If yes, is there an FTP
site where I can get it. Any help would be appreciated.

S. Dregia
Dept. of MSE
OSU


From 100012.1163@CompuServe.COM Thu Jan 20 19:46:28 1994
Received: from dub-img-1.compuserve.com  for 100012.1163@CompuServe.COM
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id TAA01161; Thu, 20 Jan 1994 19:46:25 -0500
Received: from localhost by dub-img-1.compuserve.com (8.6.4/5.930129sam)
	id TAA17802; Thu, 20 Jan 1994 19:45:56 -0500
Date: 20 Jan 94 14:35:05 EST
From: "100012.1163@compuserve.com Rainer Stumpe" <100012.1163@CompuServe.COM>
Message-ID: <940120193505_100012.1163_BHB78-1@CompuServe.COM>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: On-line chem. and electronic publ.


Dr. Rzepa wrote on Jan 15:

> e) If we can all become publishers by mounting a www document
> (or preprint), how do we handle refereeing, long term
> archiving, quality control and proofing, and indeed time-
> stamping and preventing fraud! Could publishers exist solely
> for  (and make money from) a role as "authentication agents"?

It certainly is an error to believe, publishers would make a
money by only playing the role of agents. Publishers -
commercial and society ones - play an important role in the
system of scientific communication. That system involves also
distribution agencies and libraries, and it makes information
available anywhere in the world; actually anywhere, and not
only theoretically. While a review system for the deposit of
contributions on an internet server can easily organized, many
of the other duties a publisher performs - obviously invisible
and unknown to the community - cannot with equal ease.

My personal view is, that publishers should and will take
advantage of the internet and at the same time continue with
their service to the benefit of science. We at Springer-Verlag
are indeed working on such projects. We operate a server with
Tables of Contents and we will expand the number of journals
covered by the "Springer Journals Preview System". We will soon
start an electronic journal (Numerical Mathematics).

Step by step, we will solve the problems associated with
electronic publishing as related to traditional printing. Great
care is taken during this process to meet the requirements and
expectations of authors, librarians, and readers. Many other
STM (Scientific, Technical and Medical) publishers are also
exploring, on their own or in cooperations, the possibilities
of electronic publishing and dissemination.

> c) Whether www might be suitable for otherwise VERY expensive
> color plates?

Well, if you consider a 10 square centimeter (4 by 4 inches)
color illustration, printed with a resolution of 14.000 dpi, 16
bit colors, you will either have to sacrifice resolution (300
dpi, 8 bit colors), or you will have to handle VERY large
files. I feel, the technology to match color prints is only
emerging; it might take another 5 years to become generally
available.

> a) whether a www server might also be used for this purpose?
> For example, we already have some chemistry material on ours,
> and the ease of implementation suggests that growth might be
> explosive in this area!

I have no problems with sending the ToCs of Theoretica Chimica
Acta to the WATOC list also. Let me know if you want to receive
it regularly.

Our server is at:
e-mail    SVSERV@VAX.NTP.SPRINGER.DE
ftp:      TRICK.NTP.SPRINGER.DE (192.129.24.12)
There is a lot of useful information available there. You might
want to take a look.

Sincerely yours

Dr. Rainer Stumpe
Sciences Editorial
Springer-Verlag
Tiergartenstr. 17
D-69121 Heidelberg

Phone: +49-(0)6221-487 310
Fax:   +49-(0)6221-487 366
Internet: Stumpe@spint.compuserve.com



From pbays@saintmarys.edu  Fri Jan 21 11:54:32 1994
Received: from jade.saintmarys.edu  for pbays@saintmarys.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id LAA07348; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 11:43:55 -0500
Received: by jade.saintmarys.edu
	(1.37.109.8/16.2) id AA22232; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 11:47:36 -0500
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 1994 11:45:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Phil Bays <pbays@saintmarys.edu>
Subject: MM3 on a PC
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <01H7XWQ4RPTUDFAJEW@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.87.9401211144.A19199-0100000@jade.saintmarys.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Has anyone ported MM3 to a 486.  I know that the InStar group in
Sweeden has ported to the Mac, but what about the PC.

Phil Bays
Saint Mary's College
Notre Dame   IN 46556
pbays@saintmarys.edu



From mizan@rz.engin.umich.edu  Fri Jan 21 12:51:59 1994
Received: from rz.engin.umich.edu  for mizan@rz.engin.umich.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id MAA07723; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 12:06:17 -0500
Received: by rz.engin.umich.edu (5.67/1.35)
	id AA47258; Fri, 21 Jan 94 17:06:15 GMT
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 94 17:06:15 GMT
From: "Tahmid I. Mizan" <mizan@engin.umich.edu>
Message-Id: <9401211706.AA47258@rz.engin.umich.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Tape drives for data storage



Hi Netters,

I am thinking of buying a tape drive to backup my md simulation
data from an IBM RS6000 machine. I would appreciate input and
insight from any of you on the following:

    What make of tape drive is most reliable ?

    Are 4mm or 8mm tape drives better ?

    Which vendors are reputable in the market ?

    How can you get most out of the vendor in terms of after sales service ?

    Have you had any good/bad experiences with a particular kind of tape/drive?


    Any problems using unix archiving commands with the drives ?

    Any problems configuring the machine to recognize the device ?

    Loss of data during transfer or in storage ?

    Is it possible to read directly from the tape into an analysis program ?

Thanks in advance to any repliers. I will summarize any replies for the
net. 

Bye.

Tahmid Mizan
University of Michigan

email: mizan@engin.umich.edu


From dickson@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca  Fri Jan 21 13:51:57 1994
Received: from zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca  for dickson@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id MAA08128; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 12:52:37 -0500
From: <dickson@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca>
Received: by zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA18253; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 10:38:56 -0700
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 1994 10:38:56 -0700
Message-Id: <9401211738.AA18253@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca>
To: chemistry@ccl.net, mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au
Subject: Re:  DFT and FREQ?



There are a lot of results available on vibrational frequencies with DFT;
the precis is that they're pretty good;  better than Hartree-Fock.  As
for open-shell systems, there is (naturally) less work available, but
I know of one paper by Laming, Handy and Amos that addresses this very
issue:  Molecular Physics 80(5), 1121 (1993).  They deal only with
diatomic molecules, but their results suggest to me that DFT is superior
to MP2 for vibrational frequencies of open-shell molecules.

Ross Dickson, Univ. of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
dickson@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca

From mercie@med.cornell.edu  Fri Jan 21 14:51:58 1994
Received: from cumc.cornell.edu  for mercie@med.cornell.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id OAA08957; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 14:11:30 -0500
Received: from localhost (mercie@localhost) by cumc.cornell.edu (8.6.4/ECH1.13) id OAA00757; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 14:08:44 -0500
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 1994 14:08:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Gustavo Mercier <mercie@med.cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: DFT and FREQ?
To: Magda Wajrak <mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <9401210732.AA19598@pack.crystal.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9401211326.B414-0100000@med.cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




On Fri, 21 Jan 1994, Magda Wajrak wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I just wanted to ask, if anyone could tell me how good is the DFT method in
> calculating vibrational frequencies. I am particularly interested in its
> performance for open-shell molecules. 
> 

They appear to be pretty good. This is no surprise since DFT seems to
do a pretty good job with energetics and geometries, although you will
need to include gradient corrections to the exchange-correlation functional
for accurate work. Some references:

Density Functional Methods in Chemistry
eds. J.K. Labanowski and J.W.Andzelm
pub. Springer-Verlag
1991 ISBN: 0-387-97512-8

Check out the article in page 77 by D. R. Salahub et. al., "Gaussian -
based Density Functional Methodology, Software, and Applications"

Also, the following article addresses relativistic effects within the
Hartree - Fock - Slater formalism as implemented by Baerends (essentially
Xa method with LCAO-MO), but includes frequencies computed for heavy TM:

Relativistic effects on bonding
T. Ziegler et. al.
J. Chem. Phys. 74(2), 15 Jan. 1981
p. 1271

good luck
gus mercier
mercie@cumc.cornell.edu


