From MKRISM@tifrvax.tifr.res.in  Wed Jan 26 00:44:28 1994
Received: from tifrvax.tifr.res.in  for MKRISM@tifrvax.tifr.res.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id AAA12645; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 00:24:28 -0500
From: <MKRISM@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>
Received: from tifrvax.tifr.res.in by tifrvax.tifr.res.in (PMDF #12198) id
 <01H84897DVLC000BG4@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>; Tue, 25 Jan 1994 23:19 +0530
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 1994 23:19 +0530
Subject: franck-factors for ammonia
To: Chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01H84897DVLC000BG4@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>
X-VMS-To: IN%"Chemistry@ccl.net"



Dear Friends,
     I am looking for the franck-condon factors for the excitation of 
ammonia from the ground electronic state to the different excited 
states. I would like to know if there is any compilation
of the franck-condon factors for the excitations, in case of other
small molecules like water,H2S etc., also.
I would be grateful to recieve any references which have this 
information available.
Thanking you in advance.

M.Krishnamurthy,
Atomic and  Molecular Sciences,
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research,
Homi Bhabha Road, Navy Nagar,
Bombay 400 005.
India.

E-mail: MKRISM@tifrvax.tifr.res.in


From koyanagi@watsci.uwaterloo.ca  Wed Jan 26 01:44:32 1994
Received: from watserv1.uwaterloo.ca  for koyanagi@watsci.uwaterloo.ca
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id AAA12788; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 00:49:52 -0500
Received: from watsci.uwaterloo.ca by watserv1.uwaterloo.ca with SMTP
	id <AA16057>; Wed, 26 Jan 94 00:49:48 -0500
Received: by watsci.uwaterloo.ca (931110.SGI/931108.SGI.ANONFTP)
	for @watserv1.uwaterloo.ca:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA20198; Wed, 26 Jan 94 00:49:40 -0500
From: koyanagi@watsci.uwaterloo.ca (Greg Koyanagi)
Message-Id: <9401260549.AA20198@watsci.uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: Gaussian-92 difficulty... X RAN OUT IN RYSROT
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 0:49:39 EST
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]


Dear Comp-Chem netters:

I've sent the following letter to Gaussian asking for assistance, however
we do not subscribe to their "On-demand-help-line" so any response I
recieve may not arrive in a timely manner, if at all.

I would appreciate any info or solutions from someone in-the-know or who
has had and conquered a similar problem.

Thanks in advance for any and all help,

Greg Koyanagi                         E-mail (koyanagi@watsci.uwaterloo.ca)
Department of Chemistry               Voice  519-885-1211 (x6388)
University of Waterloo                FAX    519-746-0453
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
N2L 3G1

Text of letter:
************************************************************************
I have been attempting to perform frozen-core MP2 frequency calculations
on small hydrocarbon neutrals and cations and have had difficulty in
persuading the computations to complete.

The computer being used is an SGI with (8x)-33MHz R3000 chips, revision 2.
There are 128 MBytes of main memory and 5GB of scratch disk space.
The version of gaussian gives:
 ***************************************
 Gaussian 92:  SGI-G92RevE.2  4-Aug-1993
              22-Oct-1993
 ***************************************

Several systems have resulted in the computation dying with the error:
=====================================================================
 Use MO integrals over full window.
 2PDM will be sorted in   1 passes.
 Compute integral second derivatives.
 ... and contract with generalized density number  2.
 Use density number 2.
 RysSet:  KIntrp=     2354   KCalc=        0   KAssym=     2821
 Use density number 2.
 Adding in external 2PDM contributions.
 TWLHES:  FMTGEN WAS CALLED     42612 TIMES.
 Compute integral second derivatives.
 DF integral derivatives using scalar Rys method.
 Use density number 2.
 Adding in external 2PDM contributions.
 Standard cutoffs used.
 PQCut1= 1.00D-20 PQCut2= 1.00D-20 PQCut3= 1.00D+02 PQCut4= 1.00D-20
 X RAN OUT IN RYSROT.
 Error termination in Lnk1e.
sh: 9799 Memory fault - core dumped


Which was produced from the input file:
======================================
%Chk=ch2oh02
%NProc=1
%Mem=2800000
#N MP2/6-31+G(2d,2p) GEOM=CHECK GUESS=CHECK FREQ TEST

ch2oh(+) freq

1       1
======================================


The checkpoint file was produced by the following input file:
============================================================
%Chk=ch2oh02
#N MP2/6-31+G(2d,2p) OPT=TIGHT TEST

ch2oh(+)

1 1
C
O C rCO
H1 C rCH1 O HCO1
H2 C rCH2 O HCO2 H1 HCOH
H3 O rOH3 C HOC3 H1 HOCH

rCO 1.252489
rCH1 1.087204
rCH2 1.085003
rOH3 0.981446
HCO1 121.477
HCO2 115.408
HOC3 114.484
HCOH 180.0
HOCH 0.0

============================================================

Which completed and ended with:
====================================================
 Test job not archived.
 1\1\UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO-WATSCI\FOPT\RMP2-FC\6-31+G(2D,2P)\C1H3O1(1+
 )\KOYANAGI\22-Oct-1993\1\\#N MP2/6-31+G(2D,2P) OPT=TIGHT TEST\\ch2oh(+
 )\\1,1\C\O,1,rCO\H,1,rCH1,2,HCO1\H,1,rCH2,2,HCO2,3,HCOH,0\H,2,rOH3,1,H
 OC3,3,HOCH,0\\rCO=1.252489\rCH1=1.087204\rCH2=1.085003\rOH3=0.981446\H
 CO1=121.477\HCO2=115.408\HOC3=114.484\HCOH=180.\HOCH=0.\\Version=SGI-G
 92RevE.2\State=1-A'\HF=-114.1741398\MP2=-114.5061648\RMSD=2.208e-09\RM
 SF=1.082e-06\Dipole=0.6354071,0.,-0.5293646\PG=CS [SG(C1H3O1)]\\@
====================================================


I have determined that the link executing was calling a utility in
utilnz.F which has the documenting comments:

COPYRIGHTED STUFF DELETED FOR PUBLIC MAILING....
*   
*  Insert here comments for a subroutine that attempts to 
*  determine roots of an equation involved in the 
*  Rys method.  SUBROUTINE RYSROT
*

Subsequently, I have successfully computed the frequencies in the above
instance using freq=numer, however, this would prove too large a task for
some of the systems I wish to study. (My best estimate for the next largest
is 16-20 days and 60-100 days for the system above that).  Similar analytic
computations have completed in 3 to 4 days.

I would appreciate any ideas or information you may have that would allow
me to compute the frequencies using the analytic algorithm.


Sincerly,

Greg Koyanagi                         E-mail (koyanagi@watsci.uwaterloo.ca)
Department of Chemistry               Voice  519-885-1211 (x6388)
University of Waterloo                FAX    519-746-0453
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
N2L 3G1



From jkshin@radon.sait.samsung.co.kr  Wed Jan 26 02:44:36 1994
Received: from han.hana.nm.kr  for jkshin@radon.sait.samsung.co.kr
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id BAA13777; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 01:54:15 -0500
Received: from  (saitgw.sait.samsung.co.kr) by han.hana.nm.kr (4.1/KUM-0.1)
	id AA19624; Wed, 26 Jan 94 15:55:51 KST
Received: from radon.sait.samsung.co.kr by  (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA26000; Wed, 26 Jan 94 15:55:23 KST
Received: by radon.sait.samsung.co.kr (920330.SGI/920502.SGI.AUTO)
	for @saitgw.sait.samsung.co.kr:chemistry@ccl.net id AA02334; Wed, 26 Jan 94 15:56:29 +0900
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 15:56:29 +0900
From: jkshin@radon.sait.samsung.co.kr (Jaikwang Shin)
Message-Id: <9401260656.AA02334@radon.sait.samsung.co.kr>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Journal Information


Dear Netters:
   I would like to know about the journal "Theo. Chim. Acta".
Does anyon know the name and address of the editor in chief
and how much time it takes(in average) to get reply after 
submission of manuscripts?
Any kinds of information will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Jai K. Shin: jkshin@radon.sait.samsung.co.kr 


From dirk@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl  Wed Jan 26 05:44:32 1994
Received: from rulway.LeidenUniv.nl  for dirk@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id EAA14717; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 04:56:59 -0500
Received: from rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl by rulway.LeidenUniv.nl with SMTP id AA06318
  (5.65c+/IDA-1.4.4 for <@RULWAY.LEIDENUNIV.NL:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>); Wed, 26 Jan 1994 10:56:37 +0100
Received: by rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl (920330.SGI/920502.SGI)
	for @RULWAY.LEIDENUNIV.NL:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA00811; Wed, 26 Jan 94 10:57:44 -0800
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 10:57:44 -0800
From: dirk@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl (Dirk Huckriede)
Message-Id: <9401261857.AA00811@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Fitting molecular structures



Hello all,

I have two sets of cartesian coordinates. They both contain a common part, say
a  five membered ring. The orientation of each molecule is different. 
I want both molecules to have the same orientation based on the common part. 
Does anyone of you out there tried to solve this ? 

Any help will be appreciated.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Dirk Huckriede                
                               
 Conformational Analysis Group 
 Gorlaeus Laboratories         
 Leiden University             
                               
 P.O. Box    9502                Phone : +31 71 274505             
 2300 RA   Leiden                  Fax : +31 71 274488             
 The  Netherlands               E-mail : dirk@rulglj.leidenuniv.nl 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"to be or nut^H^H^H -- sh^Gt, how do I delete..^?^?^? Oh No Oh NO^D^D^D -- How
do I get out of this thing anyway^C^C^C Kill it^Z^Z^Z (mumble mumble)
Bus error (core dumped)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From tgocsv@urc.tue.nl  Wed Jan 26 07:44:34 1994
Received: from mailhost.tue.nl  for tgocsv@urc.tue.nl
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id HAA15406; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 07:40:05 -0500
From: <tgocsv@urc.tue.nl>
Received: from alliant.urc.tue.nl by mailhost.tue.nl with SMTP id AA24172
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>); Wed, 26 Jan 1994 13:39:38 +0100
Received: by alliant.urc.tue.nl (5.0/1.51)
    id AA24253; Wed, 26 Jan 94 13:41:59 EST
Message-Id: <9401261241.AA24253@alliant.urc.tue.nl>
Subject: Fitting of CD spectra
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 13:41:58 EST
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL6]


Dear Netters,

Does anybody have experience with program(s) to fit CD spectra
and programs which can do CD deconvolution? Thanks already.

Michiel Bouman

From b_duke@lacebark.ntu.edu.au  Wed Jan 26 07:58:28 1994
Received: from lacebark.ntu.edu.au  for b_duke@lacebark.ntu.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id GAA15301; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 06:54:07 -0500
From: <b_duke@lacebark.ntu.edu.au>
Received: by lacebark.ntu.edu.au (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA07816; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 21:22:17 -0600
Message-Id: <9401270322.AA07816@lacebark.ntu.edu.au>
Subject: xmol for IBM RISC 6000?
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net (chemistry)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 21:22:13 -0600 (CST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 671       


G'day again, CCL Netters,

xmol sounds a really useful program and there is stuff in the CCL
archives that prepares data for it - xvibs and some perl scripts
>from Jan. However I gather it runs only on SGI. Does anyone have
any news about a port to the RS6K? I know some progress has been
made in Leo Radom's group in Canberra by Tony Scott, but it is not
complete. Is anyone else working on this?

Cheers, Brian.
-- 
        Associate Professor Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke)
School of Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Northern Territory University,
Box 40146, Casuarina, NT 0811, Australia.  Phone 089-466702
e-mail: b_duke@lacebark.ntu.edu.au  or b_duke@uncl04.ntu.edu.au

From b_duke@lacebark.ntu.edu.au  Wed Jan 26 07:59:08 1994
Received: from lacebark.ntu.edu.au  for b_duke@lacebark.ntu.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id GAA15278; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 06:46:32 -0500
From: <b_duke@lacebark.ntu.edu.au>
Received: by lacebark.ntu.edu.au (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA10367; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 21:14:45 -0600
Message-Id: <9401270314.AA10367@lacebark.ntu.edu.au>
Subject: chelpg and g92.
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net (chemistry)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 21:14:30 -0600 (CST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1022      


G'day, CCL Netters,

The version of chelpgunix.f in the CCL archives reads G90 chk files.
Does anyone have a version that reads G92 files?

It would be necessary (I think) to alter COMMON /MOL/ since MaxAtm in
G90 was 400 and it is 1000 in G92. Changes would also need to be made in
COMMON /B/. I also suspect that reading G92 files would come across the
same problem I asked about recently reading C in /MOL/ in psig90. This 
gives incorrect results in some cases. It seems necessary to read and 
then untangle the coordinates of each shell. Alternately, chelpg could 
be written to read the ascii chk file produced using formchk.

If anyone does have a version for g92, could it be put in the CCL
archives? It would save us reinventing the wheel.

Cheers, Brian
-- 
        Associate Professor Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke)
School of Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Northern Territory University,
Box 40146, Casuarina, NT 0811, Australia.  Phone 089-466702
e-mail: b_duke@lacebark.ntu.edu.au  or b_duke@uncl04.ntu.edu.au

From young@slater.cem.msu.edu  Wed Jan 26 08:44:43 1994
Received: from msu.edu  for young@slater.cem.msu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id IAA15729; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 08:09:59 -0500
Received: from slater.cem.msu.edu by msu.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
   Wed, 26 Jan 94 08:10:08 EST
Received: by slater.cem.msu.edu (920330.SGI/911001.SGI)
	for @msu.edu:chemistry@ccl.net id AA14778; Wed, 26 Jan 94 08:10:45 -0500
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 08:10:45 -0500
From: young@slater.cem.msu.edu (Dave Young)
Message-Id: <9401261310.AA14778@slater.cem.msu.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Gaussian quirks



Hi,

	I'm sure many of the subscribers to this list are fluent users
of the Gaussian XX programs.  Although these are wonderful programs,
the number of revsions and authors has created a number of places
where the manual is either wrong or too vague. 

	I don't mean to offend the authors.  I couldn't keep on top
of that volume of code either.

	However, my question is this does anyone have a compilation
of the various work arounds for these quirks?  Following are two
that I have found.

1.  In order to request a tighter convergence criteria, the command
"conv=7" for 10**-7 convergence doesn't work in our version, but the
command "iop(5/6=7)" will have the same result.

2.  When doing a CISD calculation, the command "pop=no" does not give
a complete set of natural orbitals with occupation numbers.  (By complete
set, I desire all orbitals with non-zero occupations.)  However, if 
you are creating a cube file from a CI calculation and have the
commands "pop=no density=ci cubedensity=density" THEN you get the
natural orbitals.

	Please send comments directly to me young@slater.cem.msu.edu
and I will summarize for the list.




				Dave Young
				young@slater.cem.msu.edu
				youngdc@msucem




From desmarai@CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA  Wed Jan 26 09:44:35 1994
Received: from condor.CC.UMontreal.CA  for desmarai@CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id JAA16283; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 09:18:39 -0500
Received: from chims1.CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA by condor.CC.UMontreal.CA with SMTP id AA18756
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for chemistry@ccl.net); Wed, 26 Jan 1994 09:16:23 -0500
Received: by chims1.CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA (930416.SGI/5.17)
	id AA13513; Wed, 26 Jan 94 09:16:24 -0500
From: desmarai@CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA (Desmarais Normand)
Message-Id: <9401261416.AA13513@chims1.CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA>
Subject: For user of SURVIB & POLYMODE ONLY!!!
To: chemistry@ccl.net (Computer Chemistry List)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 09:16:23 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1025      


Hello!


	a friend of me needs some information about SURVIB and
POLYMODE...  He's french and his english is very bad so if you
can write in french do it please...

Here is the problem:

SURVIB
======

	He wants to calculate the IR intensities of the overtone and
hot bands (in french: les bandes harmoniques et les bandes de 
combinaisons).  He need to know if he must give:

1) the dipole moment,
2) the component of the dipole moment in the symetry axis,
3) the component of the dipole moment in the plane of symetry if there
   is one?


POLYMODE
========

	He wants to know how to calculate the energy of a giving
state...  Must he calculates it from the energy of the state (000..0)
of the first SCF-CI iteration or must he recalculates it for each
(000..0) states of the diferent iterations?


	I hope the questions are clear enough... if you need more input
just send me a message.  Please send your answer to me, not to the CCL.
Thank you for your concern!

Normand Desmarais.
desmarai@chims1.chimcn.umontreal.ca





From raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu  Wed Jan 26 09:46:18 1994
Received: from thorin.uthscsa.edu  for raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id JAA16252; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 09:13:37 -0500
Received: from bioc01.uthscsa.edu by thorin.uthscsa.edu with SMTP;
          Wed, 26 Jan 1994 8:14:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: by bioc01.uthscsa.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA08688; Wed, 26 Jan 94 08:13:56 CST
From: raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu (C.S.RAMAN)
Message-Id: <9401261413.AA08688@bioc01.uthscsa.edu>
Subject: Re: Fitting of CD spectra
To: tgocsv@urc.tue.nl
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 08:13:55 -0600 (CST)
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <9401261241.AA24253@alliant.urc.tue.nl> from "tgocsv@urc.tue.nl" at Jan 26, 94 01:41:58 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL3]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1286      


> Does anybody have experience with program(s) to fit CD spectra
> and programs which can do CD deconvolution? Thanks already.

Yes, I do that quite often for Proteins.  There are different algorithms
for accomplishing this and the most popular of which is called VARSELEC
>from Curtis Johnson's group (utilises SVD).  Gerald Fasman also
distributes code to deconvolve CD spectra.  Of course, the most rigorous
one I know of is called CONTIN (by Provencher).  I would be more than
happy to answer any specific questions.

Cheers
-raman
-- 
C.S.Raman                                 raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu - Internet
UNIX Programming & Administration         70412.2354@compuserve.com - CIS
SPARC & SGI Systems                       raman@hermes.chpc.utexas.edu - CHPC
Department of Biochemistry                c.raman@launchpad.unc.edu
UTHSCSA       
7703 Floyd Curl Dr.                       (210) 567-6623   [Tel]
San Antonio, TX 78284-7760                (210) 567-6595   [Fax]
******************************************************************************
         If a man's wit be wandering, let him study the Mathematics
                                                            -Francis Bacon   
******************************************************************************

From walt@ibm1.carb.nist.gov  Wed Jan 26 09:47:02 1994
Received: from ENH.NIST.GOV  for walt@ibm1.carb.nist.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id IAA16118; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 08:56:28 -0500
Received: from ibm1.carb.nist.gov by ENH.NIST.GOV (PMDF V4.2-13 #4653) id
 <01H84SETQCR4000TNV@ENH.NIST.GOV>; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 08:56:16 EDT
Received: by ibm1.carb.nist.gov (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA17996; Wed,
 26 Jan 1994 08:56:43 -0500
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 08:33:28 -0500 (EST)
From: "Dr. Walter J. Stevens" <walt@ibm1.carb.nist.gov>
Subject: Background Priority
To: Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Message-id: <Pine.3.87.9401260828.A12359-0100000@ibm1.carb.nist.gov>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT



Some time ago I posted a question to the list about executing
jobs in the background on SGI and IBM workstations.  I was
interested in execution priorities that would allow a job to
soak-up unused machine cycles without interfering with foreground
or higher priority jobs.  The 'nice' command doesn't have enough
range.

Thanks to everyone who responded.  We haven't made much progress with
with IBM AIX.  Here is a summary of the responses:

-  Use 'npri' on the SGI workstations.
   eg. npri -h 150 <command>
   This works pretty well, but I haven't found an equivalent 
   command for IBM AIX.

-  Use NQS (Network Queuing System) to distribute load and
   the 'qdel -s' option to stop jobs during the day.
   This is not quite what we're looking for, since interactive
   and priority foreground use continue at all hours.

-  IBM RS/6000s do not timeshare well.
   This is true.  We usually run two jobs max.  However, a 'sponge'
   priority for deep background execution isn't really timesharing.

-  Try 'Batch 4.0' for SGI which is available from Scott Presnell.
   Contact him at srp@zgi.com.
   Free for academics and gov. but need license.
   Docs and man pages available  (FTP 128.218.21.42).
   We haven't tried this yet, but it does have provisions for
   giving high priority to active console users.  Looks interesting.

-  Try the commercial package 'nanny' from Terry Coley
   (terry@wag.caltech.edu).  This is an automatic priority
   controller that can give priority to active console users and
   can also balance the percentage of cycles given to each user.
   A free trial version is available at ftp.wag.caltech.edu:/pub/nanny.
   We are evaluating this one.  No conclusions so far.

--------------------------------------------------
Dr. Walter J. Stevens                        
Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology
National Institute of Standards and Technology
and University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute
9600 Gudelsky Drive
Rockville, MD  20850
Phone:  (301) 738-6264
FAX  :  (301) 738-6255
E-MAIL: walt@ibm1.carb.nist.gov
--------------------------------------------------



From rsjuds@california.sandia.gov  Wed Jan 26 12:44:58 1994
Received: from california.sandia.gov  for rsjuds@california.sandia.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id MAA18396; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 12:25:30 -0500
Received: from localhost by california.sandia.gov (8.6.4/1.15)
	id JAA29153; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 09:25:24 -0800
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 09:25:24 -0800
From: rsjuds@california.sandia.gov (judson richard s)
Message-Id: <199401261725.JAA29153@california.sandia.gov>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: atom type conversions
Cc: rsjuds@california.sandia.gov


Folks,

Does anyone out there have routines that do a reasonable conversion between
atom types in different MM force fields. I'm particularly interested in
baing able to take files that Sybyl puts out and convert them to something
that CHARMm can read.

 -----------------------------------------------
| Richard Judson				|
| Center for Computational Engineering/8117	|
| Sandia National Laboratories			|
| Livermore, CA 94551-0969			|
| (510)294-1438					|
| email: rsjuds@ca.sandia.gov			|
|						|
 -----------------------------------------------

From m10!frisch@uunet.UU.NET  Wed Jan 26 12:56:15 1994
Received: from relay2.UU.NET  for m10!frisch@uunet.UU.NET
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id MAA18365; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 12:20:49 -0500
Received: from spool.uu.net (via LOCALHOST) by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AAwant15010; Wed, 26 Jan 94 12:18:47 -0500
Message-Id: <9401261718.AAwant15010@relay2.UU.NET>
Received: from m10.UUCP by uucp6.uu.net with UUCP/RMAIL
	(queueing-rmail) id 115332.17377; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 11:53:32 EST
Received: by m10.gaussian.com; Wed, 26 Jan 94 11:50:25 EST
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 11:50:25 EST
From: m10!frisch@uunet.UU.NET (Michael Frisch)
Subject: Re: chelpg and g92.
To: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <uunet!lacebark.ntu.edu.au!b_duke>, Wed, 26 Jan 1994 21:14:30 -0600 (CST)


Brian Salter-Duke asked:

    G'day, CCL Netters,
    
    The version of chelpgunix.f in the CCL archives reads G90 chk files.
    Does anyone have a version that reads G92 files?
    
    It would be necessary (I think) to alter COMMON /MOL/ since MaxAtm in
    G90 was 400 and it is 1000 in G92. Changes would also need to be made in
    COMMON /B/. I also suspect that reading G92 files would come across the
    same problem I asked about recently reading C in /MOL/ in psig90. This 
    gives incorrect results in some cases. It seems necessary to read and 
    then untangle the coordinates of each shell. Alternately, chelpg could 
    be written to read the ascii chk file produced using formchk.
    
    If anyone does have a version for g92, could it be put in the CCL
    archives? It would save us reinventing the wheel.
    
Gaussian 92 can do potential-derived charges itself -- Pop=ChelpG on the
route card will do it.  The default atomic radii used are those recommended
by Breneman, but you can specific your own if you like.

Mike Frisch
-------

From YQIN@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  Wed Jan 26 12:56:55 1994
Received: from aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  for YQIN@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id MAA18207; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 12:00:49 -0500
From: <YQIN@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu>
Message-Id: <199401261700.MAA18207@www.ccl.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 10:58 CST
Subject: Where can I get the frequency of phenoxide and phenol cation?
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net, MAILSERV@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: 
 IN%"CHEMISTRY@ccl.net",IN%"MAILSERV@ccl.net","chemistry-request@ccl.net",IN%"chemistry-search@ccl.net"


Dear netters:

      I am looking for both experiment and theoritical works on the vibrational 
frequency measurement (or calculation), and spin density measurement (for phenol
cation only) of the phenoxide anion and phenol cation.  I did some literature 
search, I do get two papers ( J. Chem Phys. 82, 5329 1985 by S. Anderson and
co-workers; Int. J. Mass Spec. and Ion Process 117,601,1992 by R. F. Gunion 
and co-workers).  I would appreciate it very much if someone can provide more 
information.   Thank you very much in advance.   


                                              Yuli  qin

                                   yqin@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu   



From tudor@wucmd.wustl.edu  Wed Jan 26 13:45:01 1994
Received: from wugate.wustl.edu  for tudor@wucmd.wustl.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id NAA19045; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 13:14:30 -0500
Received: by wugate.wustl.edu (5.67b+/WUSTL-0.3) with SMTP 
	id AA17641; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 12:14:24 -0600
Received: by wucmd (911016.SGI/911001.SGI)
	for @wugate.wustl.edu:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA01383; Wed, 26 Jan 94 16:53:09 GMT
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 10:38:27 -0600 (CST)
From: Tudor Oprea <tudor@wucmd.wustl.edu>
Subject: Re: Fitting molecular structures
To: Dirk Huckriede <dirk@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl>
Cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <9401261857.AA00811@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.07.9401261026.A1032-c100000@wucmd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




On Wed, 26 Jan 1994, Dirk Huckriede wrote:

> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I have two sets of cartesian coordinates. They both contain a common part, say
> a  five membered ring. The orientation of each molecule is different. 
> I want both molecules to have the same orientation based on the common part. 
> Does anyone of you out there tried to solve this ? 
> 
> Any help will be appreciated.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Dirk Huckriede                
>                                
>  Conformational Analysis Group 
>  Gorlaeus Laboratories         
>  Leiden University             
>                                
>  P.O. Box    9502                Phone : +31 71 274505             
>  2300 RA   Leiden                  Fax : +31 71 274488             
>  The  Netherlands               E-mail : dirk@rulglj.leidenuniv.nl 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "to be or nut^H^H^H -- sh^Gt, how do I delete..^?^?^? Oh No Oh NO^D^D^D -- How
> do I get out of this thing anyway^C^C^C Kill it^Z^Z^Z (mumble mumble)
> Bus error (core dumped)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First put this line in your .cshrc - it will help you get OUT
limit coredumpsize 0 kbytes
;-)

Second, it depends on the type of investigation you are doing. If a geometric fit
satisfies you, just match the atoms you think correspond (any modeling program will
do that). If you have a pharmacophore hypothesis, try to fit the common pharmaco-
phoric elements, regardless of the actual structural fit. This should give you
an idea of how the two structures fit in the same binding site. 
If you can go sophisticated, use the field-fit procedure in Sybyl, that would allow
you to fit one ligand in the steric and electrostatic (or in either one of them)
individually. I advise you relax the resulting field-fitted structure using 
steepest-descent for ~100 steps, then conjugate gradient (to go to the nearest pit).
Clark et al, Tetrahedron Comput Methodol 1990 3:47 for field fit
It is possible to use the approach of Perkins & Dean (JCAMD 1993 7:155) which will
allow you to use simulated annealing & cluster analysis to get the best match.
RECEPTOR & Constrained systematic search are available in Sybyl - use that in
conjunction with the Active Analog Approach
Dammkoehler et al, JCAMD 1989 3:3
If you want to go automatic, use DISCO (from Yvonne Martin, Abbott)
see Trends in Molecular Modelling '92 (ESCOM, Leiden - your town! 1993), 
ed. CG Wermuth, for Martin et al, pp 20 - and references therein.
Other procedures that you may use are: Grid (from Peter Goodford) and Cosmic
(from Andy Vinter) - both probe the molecules with H+, HO- and H20 and 
superpose fields, rather than structures.
Contact me if you have any questions...


--Tudor

                                                     ==========================
  Tudor-Ionel Oprea                                  = Tel. (1-314) 935 4672  =
  Research Associate                                 = Fax. (1-314) 935 4979  =
  Washington University Center for Molecular Design  = Email:                 =
  Lopata 510, Box 1099, One Brookings Drive          = tudor@wucmd.wustl.edu  =
  St.Louis MO 63130                                  ==========================




From kcross@cas.org  Wed Jan 26 14:44:41 1994
Received: from srv01s4.cas.org  for kcross@cas.org
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id OAA20006; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 14:07:38 -0500
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 14:07:05 EST
From: kcross@cas.org (Kevin P. Cross Ext. 3192)
Message-Id: <9401261407.AA6894@cas.org>
Subject: Spring ACS Scientific Visualization and Multi-Media Program
To: chemistry@ccl.net


Below is the program for the Scientific Visualization and Multi-Media
Symposium at the Spring ACS National Meeting in San Diego March 13-18th.
Mark your calendars now and plan to stay through Thursday for an exciting time!

	Sincerely,

	James W. Cooper, jwcnmr@yktvmv.vnet.ibm.com
	Kevin P. Cross, kcross@cas.org
	Weige Xue, weigex@autodesk.com
	(the symposium organizers)

ACS SPRING NATIONAL MEETING: COMPUTERS IN CHEMISTRY DIVISION
PROGRAM FOR SCIENTIFIC VISUALIZATION AND MULTI-MEDIA SYMPOSIUM

WEDNESDAY MORNING MARCH 16, 1994

8:45-8:55       Introductory Remarks

8:55-9:25       VISUALIZATION OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL NMR DATA,
		Robert D. Johnson, Peter Bluemler, Richter Rafey and
		Dominique Brodbeck, IBM Almaden Research Center

9:25-9:55       VISUALIZATION OF CHANGES ON ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES DURING
		CHEMICAL REACTIONS, James O. Currie, Jr., Pacific University

9:55-10:25      VISUALIZING MOLECULAR ELECTROSTATIC FIELDS,
		Richard Sefecka, David Silverman and Dan Platt,
		IBM T J Watson Research Center

10:25-10:30     break

10:30-11:00     VISUALIZING IR AND NMR SPECTROSCOPY,
		Charles B. Abrams, McGill University

11:00-11:30     COMPUTER GRAPHIC APPROACHES TO VISUALIZING BIOMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS,
		Arthur J. Olson, Molecular Graphics Laboratory,
		The Scripps Research Institute,

11:30-12:00     VISUALIZATION AND ANIMATION OF ORGANIC REACTIONS ON A PC.
		James W. Cooper and Bernard Landman, IBM Watson Research


THURSDAY MORNING MARCH 17, 1994

9:00 - FACILITATING PROBLEM-SPECIFIC MOLECULAR VISUALIZATION: THE
       MIDASPLUS DELEGATE FACILITY, Conrad Huang, Eric Pettersen, Greg
       Couch, Thomas Ferrin, University of California, San Francisco.

9:30 - MOLECULAR MODELING AT THE METACENTER, Richard E. Gillilan,
       Cornell Theory Center.

10:00 - DEVELOPMENTS IN SCIENTIFIC VISUALIZATION AND MULTI-MEDIA,
	Mark E. Berger, Silicon Graphics.

10:30 - PROTEIN SURFACES AS TARGETS FOR STRUCTURE-BASED DRUG DESIGN,
	Brad A. Jameson, J. M. McDonnell, R. Wiaderkiewicz,
	Thomas Jefferson University.

11:00 - MAPPING CONFIGURATIONAL HYPERSPACE IN PROTEINS, Leo S. D.
	Caves, J. D. Evanseck, M. Karplus, Harvard University.

11:30 - ANIMATION OF CHEMICAL REACTIONS: NEW TOOLS FOR ASSIGNING
	MECHANISM, Warren J. Hehre, Wavefunction, Inc.

THURSDAY AFTERNOON MARCH 17, 1994

1:00 - A TOOL TO ENHANCE THE COMMUNICATION OF COMPLEX BIOMEDICAL
       CONCEPTS, Rod Cuddihee, Peter B. Goncalves, Sacred Heart
       University.

1:30 - MULTIMEDIA AND SCIENTIFIC VISUALIZATION IN CHEMICAL EDUCATION,
       John W. Moore, Paul F. Schatz, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

2:00 - VISUALIZATION OF ORBITAL POLARIZATION USING AVS, Doug A. Smith,
       The University of Toledo.

2:30 - DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER GRAPHIC VISUALIZATION AIDS FOR THE
       UNDERGRADUATE CHEMISTRY CURRICULUM, Nathan S. Lewis, Juniko
       Moody, Christopher W. Bryant, Mark Huber, Scott Townsend, Michael
       Medaglia, Anthony Molinaro, Andre Yew, California Institute of
       Technology.

3:00 - VISUAL CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, Erin N. Thornton, Anthony C. Hess, Chance
       R. Younkin, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory.

3:30 - ADVANCED VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR POLYMER FLOW MODELING,
       Pascal J. B. Landi, Hoechst Celanese Corp.


From jamorskc@CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA  Wed Jan 26 15:44:45 1994
Received: from condor.CC.UMontreal.CA  for jamorskc@CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id PAA21206; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 15:33:00 -0500
Received: from chims1.CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA by condor.CC.UMontreal.CA with SMTP id AA00031
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for chemistry@ccl.net); Wed, 26 Jan 1994 15:30:43 -0500
Received: by chims1.CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA (930416.SGI/5.17)
	id AA00671; Wed, 26 Jan 94 15:30:42 -0500
From: jamorskc@CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA (Jamorski Christine)
Message-Id: <9401262030.AA00671@chims1.CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA>
Subject: BIG Matrix Inversion
To: chemistry@ccl.net (Computer Chemistry List)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 15:30:42 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 157       


Hello,


	We are looking for some code to do inversion of BIG Matrix...
any references?

Thank you!

Christine Jamorski
jamorskc@chims1.chimcn.umontreal.ca



From saxena@physics.purdue.edu  Wed Jan 26 16:44:50 1994
Received: from bohr.physics.purdue.edu  for saxena@physics.purdue.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id PAA21486; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 15:52:46 -0500
Received: from localhost (saxena@localhost)
	by bohr.physics.purdue.edu (8.6.4/3.0)
	id PAA27709; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 15:53:40 -0500
Message-Id: <199401262053.PAA27709@bohr.physics.purdue.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 15:53:40 -0500
From: "Virendra K. Saxena" <saxena@physics.purdue.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net, jamorskc@CHIMCN.UMontreal.CA
Subject: Re:  BIG Matrix Inversion


         I have two small routines (one for real and other for complex) which
      I use for inverting matrices of upto 260X260 size. It workd pretty fast.
      If it can be useful to you, please send me an e-mail and I would be glad
      to send you the code.

         Goodluck

         V. K. Saxena

         saxena@physics.purdue.edu


From alex@iqm.unicamp.br  Wed Jan 26 16:46:00 1994
Received: from clio.iqm.unicamp.br  for alex@iqm.unicamp.br
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id QAA21804; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 16:22:33 -0500
Received: from localhost (alex@localhost) by clio.iqm.unicamp.br (8.6.4/8.3) id TAA00824; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 19:23:50 -0300
From: Alexandre <alex@iqm.unicamp.br>
Message-Id: <199401262223.TAA00824@clio.iqm.unicamp.br>
Subject: Atomic Charges (GAMESS 93 vs. GAUSSIAN 92)!
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 19:23:49 -0300 (GMT-3:00)
Cc: alex@iqm.unicamp.br
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 2354      


Hello!

     I did a RHF/STO-3G geometry optimization in HCl, using GAUSSIAN 92.
Then, I did a Mulliken population analysis, using GAUSSIAN 92. But, when
I did the same calculation, using GAMESS 93, the Mulliken net charges were
not the same! Why? I did the optimization geometry only with GAUSSIAN 92!

    *The GAUSSIAN 92 Input/Output is:

----------------------------------------------------
INPUT:
------

$rungauss
#n rhf/sto-3g pop=reg

... HCl ... RHF/STO-3G

0 1
H
Cl 1 r

r 1.31333495

----------------------------------------------------
OUTPUT:
-------

ENERGY: HF=-455.1360117

                   Standard orientation:
 ----------------------------------------------------------
 Center     Atomic              Coordinates (Angstroms)
 Number     Number             X           Y           Z
 ----------------------------------------------------------
    1          1            .000000     .000000   -1.240372
    2         17            .000000     .000000     .072963
 ----------------------------------------------------------


 Total atomic charges:
              1
  1  H     .173622
  2  Cl   -.173622
 Sum of Mulliken charges=    .00000
----------------------------------------------------

    *The GAMESS 93 Input/Output is:

----------------------------------------------------
INPUT:
------

 $CONTRL UNITS=ANGS $END
 $SYSTEM MEMORY=2000000 $END
 $BASIS GBASIS=STO NGAUSS=3 $END
 $DATA
... HCl ... RHF/STO-3G ...
C1
H          1             .000000     .000000   -1.240372
Cl         17            .000000     .000000     .072963
 $END
-----------------------------------------------------
OUTPUT:
-------

ENERGY: E(RHF) =  -455.136011655

          TOTAL MULLIKEN AND LOWDIN ATOMIC POPULATIONS
       ATOM         MULL.POP.    CHARGE          LOW.POP.     CHARGE
    1 H              .869767     .130233          .920083     .079917
    2 CL           17.130233    -.130233        17.079917    -.079917
-----------------------------------------------------

     Note that I used the same geometry in both calculations! And, in fact,
the energy was practly the same! But the Mulliken charges...

     Does it represent a bug in GAMESS 93?

     Thanks!

------------------------------------
Alexandre Araujo de Souza.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Brazil. E-mail: alex@iqm.unicamp.br
------------------------------------

From YQIN@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  Wed Jan 26 16:46:38 1994
Received: from aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  for YQIN@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id QAA21559; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 16:00:42 -0500
From: <YQIN@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu>
Message-Id: <199401262100.QAA21559@www.ccl.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 15:01 CST
Subject: How to get Hessian (in Gamess's format) from Gaussian-92?
To: chemistry@ccl.net, chemistry-request@ccl.net, chemistry-search@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: 
 IN%"chemistry@ccl.net",IN%"chemistry-request@ccl.net",IN%"chemistry-search@ccl.net"


Dear Netters:

     We are having problems getting the hessian in gamess format
	from gaussian92.  We used the option Punch=Deriv,Gamess.
	According to the manual the keyword Deriv will give
	the energy and the first and second derivatives, however
	we are having trouble understanding the format that it
	gives.  
	We were wondering if anyone a) understands this format and
	b)knows how to convert it into a form that gamess will
	read.  This is a big problem.  If you have any suggestions
	or hints please send them to me.

	Thank you very much.

	Qin


From EDGECOMK@QUCDN.QUEENSU.CA  Wed Jan 26 18:48:15 1994
Received: from QUCDN.QueensU.CA  for EDGECOMK@QUCDN.QUEENSU.CA
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id RAA22979; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 17:46:44 -0500
Message-Id: <199401262246.RAA22979@www.ccl.net>
Received: from QUCDN.QUEENSU.CA by QUCDN.QueensU.CA (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 5940; Wed, 26 Jan 94 17:45:25 EST
Received: from QUCDN.QUEENSU.CA (NJE origin EDGECOMK@QUCDN) by QUCDN.QUEENSU.CA (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with RFC822 id 0230; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 17:45:25 -0500
Date:    Wed, 26 Jan 1994 17:40 EST
From: EDGECOMK@QUCDN.QueensU.CA
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject:  atomic charges


Re: differences between G92 and GAMESS charges.
 The first thing to do here is to check to see
that the integral accuracy is the same as well as the
convergence criteria for the SCF.
 Other than that perhaps someone with more GAMESS experience
(and G92 as well if there is a problem with the accuracy)
can help.
 Take care.
           Ken Edgecombe

From SBOESCH@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  Wed Jan 26 23:44:44 1994
Received: from aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  for SBOESCH@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id XAA24764; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 23:01:58 -0500
From: <SBOESCH@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu>
Message-Id: <199401270401.XAA24764@www.ccl.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 22:02 CST
Subject: How do you change g92 hessian into one that gamess will read?
To: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"


	Dear Netters:
	
	We are having trouble getting the hessian matrix into gamess
	format from gaussian 92.
	In the frequency calculation we are running in G92, we
	specify the keyword PUNCH=GAMESS,DERIV.
	According to the manual DERIV will give us the energy and
	first and second derivatives.
	The second derivative (the hessian) is what I am really 
	interested in.  The problem is we cannot understand the
	output in the fort.7 file.
	What we need to do is to take the hessian from this
	gaussian 92 calculation and transform it into gamess format
	and put it in a gamess input file to do another calculation.
	
	If anyone has any suggestions on how to do this, please
	tell us.

	Thank you.

	Scott Boesch    sboesch@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu

