From terry@wag.caltech.edu  Wed Mar 23 01:43:54 1994
Received: from sgi1  for terry@wag.caltech.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id BAA28288; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 01:02:38 -0500
Received: by sgi1 id AA04901
  (931110.SGI/IDA-1.4.4); Tue, 22 Mar 94 22:02:36 -0800
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 94 22:02:36 -0800
From: "Terry R. Coley" <terry@wag.caltech.edu>
Message-Id: <9403230602.AA04901@sgi1>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: seeking peak identification/fitting software


I would apreciate pointers to publically available software which can
perform background subtraction, peak separations, and peak integrations
on some UV/Vis absorbance spectra we have collected.  We do not need 
peak assignments.

I will summarize to the network.
Thank you.

        - Terry 

Terry R. Coley, Ph.D.
terry@wag.caltech.edu 818-395-2723
Caltech, M/S 139-74
Pasadena, CA  91125


From DSMITH@uoft02.utoledo.edu  Wed Mar 23 12:43:59 1994
Received: from uoft02.utoledo.edu  for DSMITH@uoft02.utoledo.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id MAA05353; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 12:26:04 -0500
Received: from UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU by UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU (PMDF V4.2-10 #5345) id
 <01HAB7TSNEN400018K@UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU>; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 12:21:48 EST
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1994 12:21:48 -0500 (EST)
From: "DR. DOUGLAS A. SMITH, UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO" <DSMITH@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
Subject: energy partitioning question
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HAB7TSNOAA00018K@UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: CHEMISTRY
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Can someone provide me with the references to the original paper(s) by
Morokuma which describe how to partition energy into its component terms,
such as dispersion, electrostatic, etc.?  Also, if anyone is aware of this
method being applied to hydrogen bonds or hydrogen bonding systems, please
forward those references as well.  I would appreciate it.

Doug

Douglas A. Smith
Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry
Center for Drug Design and Development
 and
Chairman-elect, ACS Division of Computers in Chemistry

The University of Toledo
Toledo, OH  43606-3390

voice    419-537-2116
fax      419-537-4033
email    dsmith@uoft02.utoledo.edu


From CHAKRAVO@ucs.indiana.edu  Wed Mar 23 13:44:16 1994
Received: from PO3.indiana.edu  for CHAKRAVO@ucs.indiana.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id MAA05456; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 12:44:55 -0500
Message-Id: <199403231744.MAA05456@www.ccl.net>
Received: from LOCAL:.prism.DECnet by PO3.Indiana.EDU; id AA01457
	(5.65c+jsm/2.5.1jsm); Wed, 23 Mar 1994 12:37:13 -0500
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 12:43:43 EST
From: Subhas Chakravorty <CHAKRAVO@ucs.indiana.edu>
X-To: PO%"chemistry@ccl.net"
Subject: RS6000 bug
To: chemistry@ccl.net


I wonder if someone has encountered the following problem
while writing
 using :  WRITE(21)(H(I),I=1,7000000)
where H = D.precision
I encounter a illegal instruction at 0X0 .....et etc
on the IBM RS6000
I wonder if there is a maximum limit to the size of the unformated
individual record size.
If there is what is it ?
Is there a way to increase it ?
Thanks
Subhas Chakravorty
-------------------
Please Note : This happens in case of large programs where virtual
               memory is used extensively total size = 200Mbytes.

From SBOESCH@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  Wed Mar 23 15:44:04 1994
Received: from aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  for SBOESCH@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id OAA06714; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 14:47:21 -0500
From: <SBOESCH@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu>
Message-Id: <199403231947.OAA06714@www.ccl.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 13:48 CST
Subject: slater exchange functional for g92
To: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"


	
	Dear Netters,

		Could anyone tell me what the form for the Slater
	Exchange Functional used by Gaussian 92?  Exactly what are
	the differences between the Slater Functional and the Xalpha
	functional?

	Any replies would be appreciated.

	Send reply to SBOESCH@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu

	Thanks in advance.

	Scott Boesch
	Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry
	University of Oklahoma

From zhang@mercury.chem.utah.edu  Wed Mar 23 17:44:02 1994
Received: from CHEMISTRY.CHEM.UTAH.EDU  for zhang@mercury.chem.utah.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id QAA07785; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 16:47:59 -0500
Received: from mercury.chem.utah.edu by CHEMISTRY.CHEM.UTAH.EDU with SMTP; 
          Wed, 23 Mar 1994 14:47:52 -0700 (MST)
Received: by mercury.chem.utah.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA34739; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 14:47:50 -0700
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1994 14:47:50 -0700
From: zhang@mercury.chem.utah.edu (Qi Zhang)
Message-Id: <9403232147.AA34739@mercury.chem.utah.edu>
To: DSMITH@uoft02.utoledo.edu, chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re:  CCL:energy partitioning question



Yes, this method has been applied to hydrogen bonding systems,
such as H2O...H, and H2O...H2, etc. The results has been published by
Q. Zhang, L. Chenyang, Y. Ma, F. Fish, M. M. Szczesniak and V. Buch,
J. Chem. Phys. 96(8), 1992 (6039-6047). You may find more references
there. Hope this help.

Q. Zhang, Ph.D.

From m10!frisch@uunet.UU.NET  Wed Mar 23 17:46:39 1994
Received: from relay1.UU.NET  for m10!frisch@uunet.UU.NET
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id RAA08122; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 17:12:42 -0500
Received: from uucp1.uu.net by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AAwing22709; Wed, 23 Mar 94 17:12:32 -0500
Message-Id: <9403232212.AAwing22709@relay1.UU.NET>
Received: from m10.UUCP by uucp1.uu.net with UUCP/RMAIL
        ; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 17:12:33 -0500
Received: by m10.gaussian.com; Wed, 23 Mar 94 17:08:43 EST
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 17:08:43 EST
From: m10!frisch@uunet.UU.NET (Michael Frisch)
Subject: Re: CCL:slater exchange functional for g92
To: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <uunet!aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu!SBOESCH>, Wed, 23 Mar 94 13:48 CST


Scott Boesch asked
    	
    	Dear Netters,
    
    		Could anyone tell me what the form for the Slater
    	Exchange Functional used by Gaussian 92?  Exactly what are
    	the differences between the Slater Functional and the Xalpha
    	functional?
    
Both use Rho^(4/3).  Hartree-Fock-Slater uses the theoretical value of
2/3 for the coefficient in front while Xalpha requests the commonly
used empirical value of 0.7

Mike Frisch
Gaussian, Inc.
-------

From slee@ccl.net  Wed Mar 23 23:44:06 1994
Received: from seraph.uunet.ca  for slee@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id XAA10179; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 23:28:36 -0500
Received: from hyper by mail.uunet.ca with UUCP id <101451(4)>; Wed, 23 Mar 1994 23:27:52 -0500
Received: by hyper.hyper.com (931110.SGI/890607.SGI)
	(for ccl.net!chemistry) id AA28131; Wed, 23 Mar 94 22:04:36 -0500
From: slee@ccl.net (Thomas Slee)
Message-Id: <9403240304.AA28131@hyper.hyper.com>
Subject: 2nd Order JT References
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1994 22:04:35 -0500
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL9]


Dear CCL folks,

Looking through the recent discussion of the origin of the pseudo, or 
2nd order, Jahn Teller effect, I did not see any mention of what I 
understand to be the original derivation of this effect (though close in 
time to Dr. Hobey's reference, so maybe there is more than one "original"
reference, as not infrequently happens).

Richard Bader derived the 2nd order effect, and applied
it to the symmetries of equilibrium geometries as well as to 
dissociative pathways for unimolecular reactions, in two papers:

R. F. W. Bader, Mol. Phys., 1960, 3, 137
R. F. W. Bader, Can. J. Chem., 1962, 40, 1164.

This work is discussed along with others in a fairly chronologically
oriented account by R. G. Pearson in his book "Symmetry Rules for
Chemical Reactions", Wiley, 1976.

			Tom Slee


