From pettsj@visigoth.demon.co.uk  Fri Jul 29 12:12:22 1994
Received: from post.demon.co.uk  for pettsj@visigoth.demon.co.uk
	by infomeister (8.6.9/930601.1506) id LAA12663; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 11:53:42 GMT
Received: from visigoth.demon.co.uk by post.demon.co.uk id aa09742;
          29 Jul 94 11:18 GMT-60:00
X-Sender:  (Unverified)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 11:19:39 +0000
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: James Petts <pettsj@visigoth.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Recommendation for classical QSAR software?
Message-ID:  <9407291118.aa09742@post.demon.co.uk>


Can anybody recommend a good implementation of classical QSAR which runs on
a PC (DOS or Windows) or a Mac?


--
=== James Petts ===



From AJIT@UNB.CA  Fri Jul 29 12:21:25 1994
Received: from unb.ca  for AJIT@UNB.CA
	by infomeister (8.6.9/930601.1506) id LAA12709; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 11:59:51 GMT
Received: from UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA by unb.ca (4.1/SMI-4.1-940720-08:05)
	id AA14222; Fri, 29 Jul 94 09:05:23 ADT
Received: from UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA by UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 5548; Fri, 29 Jul 94 09:05:02 ADT
Received: from UNB.CA (NJE origin MUSIC@UNBVM1) by UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5547; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 09:05:02 -0300
Message-Id:  <29JUL94.09809595.0105.MUSIC@UNB.CA>
Date:        Fri, 29 Jul 94 09:04:58 ADT
From: "Ajit J. Thakkar" <AJIT@unb.ca>
To: <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: CCL: Quadrupole moment references


      A good compilation of experimental quadrupole moments is
given in an appendix to Vol.1 of Theory of molecular fluids by
C.Gray and K. Gubbins, Oxford, 1984.

      There is also a vast literature of ab initio computations -
but beware that quadrupole moments are very sensitive to basis
set choice.  Adequate diffuse functions and polarization
functions are required.

M. Urban et al, Meth. Comp. Chem. 1 (1987) 117 is a good review

For N2, see
G. Maroulis and A.J. Thakkar, J.Chem.Phys. 88 (1988) 7623.

For O2, see
K. Andersson, P. Borowski, P.W. Fowler, P.A. Malmqvist, B.O. Roos
and A.J. Sadlej, Chem.Phys.Lett. 190 (1992) 367.

Ajit

From cletner@remcure.bmb.wright.edu  Fri Jul 29 13:12:22 1994
Received: from remcure.bmb.wright.edu  for cletner@remcure.bmb.wright.edu
	by infomeister (8.6.9/930601.1506) id MAA12908; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 12:16:24 GMT
Received: by remcure.bmb.wright.edu (931110.SGI/921111.SGI.AUTO)
	for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA04802; Fri, 29 Jul 94 08:11:31 -0700
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 08:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Charles Letner <cletner@remcure.bmb.wright.edu>
Subject: Image translation update.
To: Computational Chemistry List <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.07.9407290854.A4792-a100000@remcure.bmb.wright.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hello all,
	I've recieved a large number of responses.  Thanks to all of you. 
The most common recomendation was pbmplus followed closely by xv.  I have
used xv and this is where I get my maximum resolution of 91 dpi for post
script.  However, there are compilcating factors that need to be
addressed.  I will not have time to get the summary out today as I leave
on vacation in a few hours (Yahooooooo).  You can expect a full summary
in about a week.  Again thanks for all the information.

Best regards,
Chuck    
   

Charles Letner
Wright State University
Department of Biochemistry
Dayton, OH 45435
e-mail: cletner@remcure.bmb.wright.edu



From deguelle@telemann.scf.fundp.ac.be  Fri Jul 29 15:12:27 1994
Received: from hermes.fundp.ac.be  for deguelle@telemann.scf.fundp.ac.be
	by infomeister (8.6.9/930601.1506) id OAA15120; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 14:23:45 GMT
Received: from telemann.scf.fundp.ac.be by hermes.fundp.ac.be; id AA13566; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 16:32:31 +0200
Received: by telemann.scf.fundp.ac.be (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA26544; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 16:27:42 +0200
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 16:27:42 +0200
From: deguelle@telemann.scf.fundp.ac.be (Veronique Deguelle)
Message-Id: <9407291427.AA26544@telemann.scf.fundp.ac.be>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: PCFF force field (Huai Sun)



Hello,

        Does anybody know the e-mail address or fax of
Huai Sun who has implemented the PCFF force field for
polymer applications on the basis of BIOSYM's CFF91
force field?
        Is there anyone who has informations on the PCFF           
force field?
        Thank you very much in advance

        Veronique Deguelle

*********************************************************
Facultes Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix 
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie Informatique
Namur, Belgium

e-mail: deguelle@scf.fundp.ac.be
********************************************************* 


From jle@world.std.com  Fri Jul 29 18:12:34 1994
Received: from ftp.std.com  for jle@world.std.com
	by infomeister (8.6.9/930601.1506) id RAA18085; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 17:38:56 GMT
Received: from world.std.com by ftp.std.com (8.6.8.1/Spike-8-1.0)
	id NAB00757; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 13:44:26 -0400
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0)
	id AA16523; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 13:43:52 -0400
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 13:43:52 -0400
From: jle@world.std.com (Joe M Leonard)
Message-Id: <199407291743.AA16523@world.std.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Anybody have VdW radii for Z = 55 through Z = 86???



Folks,

	I have the values for Z = [1,54] (provided at end),
but am looking for radii for the next row of the periodic table.
Values or references will be a big help!

Joe Leonard
jle@world.std.com

---

        data waals /
     $        1.20,                              1.40,
     $        1.82,1.78,1.74,1.70,1.55,1.52,1.47,1.54,
     $        2.27,2.22,2.16,2.10,1.80,1.80,1.75,1.88,
     $        2.75,2.57,
     $             2.56,2.54,2.52,2.50,2.48,2.46,2.44,2.42,2.41,2.40,
     $                  2.40,2.10,1.85,1.90,1.85,2.02,
     $        3.10,2.80,
     $             2.77,2.74,2.71,2.68,2.65,2.62,2.59,2.56,2.53,2.51,
     $                  2.50,2.20,2.10,2.06,1.98,2.16 /

---


From nauss@ucmod2.che.uc.EDU  Fri Jul 29 19:12:27 1994
Received: from ROCK.SAN.UC.EDU  for nauss@ucmod2.che.uc.EDU
	by infomeister (8.6.9/930601.1506) id SAA19520; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 18:49:32 GMT
Received: from ucmod2.che.uc.edu by UCBEH.SAN.UC.EDU (PMDF V4.3-8 #4918)
 id <01HFA6IV800W01E6QE@UCBEH.SAN.UC.EDU>; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 14:53:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: by ucmod2.che.uc.edu (920330.SGI/920502.SGI.AUTO)
 for @uc.edu:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA20276; Fri, 29 Jul 94 15:06:45 -0400
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 15:06:45 -0400
From: nauss@ucmod2.che.uc.EDU (Jeffrey L. Nauss)
Subject: Hyperchem and IRIX 5.2
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-id: <9407291906.AA20276@ucmod2.che.uc.edu>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT



One of our professors here at UC has been running Hyperchem on a
Silicon Graphics Indigo R4000.  The version of Hyperchem is the last
one that was supported on Silicon Graphics workstations.

Since upgrading to IRIX 5.2 from IRIX 4.0.5 starting Hyperchem results
in a core dump.  We suspect a fatal incompatibility between Hyperchem
and IRIX 5.2.  There are no error messages in the syslog file.
Another program, Spartan, appears to run well.

Has anyone else seen this problem?  It is very frustrating for our
professor as he raves about Hyperchem.  However, he prefers the speed
of his Indigo over the 486 PC which also has Hyperchem.  Right now his
only alternative is to return to IRIX 4.0.5 which is not completely
satisfactory due to other considerations.

Any suggestions will be appreciated.  Thanks in advance.

						Jeff Nauss

****************************************************************************
*  UU    UU             Jeffrey L. Nauss, PhD                              *
*  UU    UU             Director, Molecular Modeling Services              *
*  UU    UU             Department of Chemistry                            *
*  UU    UU CCCCCCC     University of Cincinnati                           *
*   UU  UU CCCCCCCC     Cincinnati, OH 45221-0172                          *
*    UUUU CC                                                               *
*         CC            Telephone: 513-556-0148    Fax: 513-556-9239       *
*         CC                                                               *
*          CCCCCCCC     e-mail: nauss@ucmod2.che.uc.edu                    *
*           CCCCCCC                                                        *
****************************************************************************


From DBOYD@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU  Fri Jul 29 21:12:31 1994
Received: from indyvax.iupui.edu  for DBOYD@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU
	by infomeister (8.6.9/930601.1506) id UAA21699; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 20:55:04 GMT
Received: from INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU by INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU (PMDF V4.3-7 #5862)
 id <01HFA8Q73H9S00A265@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU>; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 16:00:32 -0500
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 16:00:32 -0500
From: "Donald B. Boyd" <DBOYD@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU>
Subject: education in comp. chem.
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HFA8Q74JUQ00A265@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU>
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
X-VMS-Cc: DBOYD
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


I am seeking information about universities that offer degrees in 
computational chemistry or modeling.  If you know of such institutions, 
can you tell me:
1.  Name of university/college?
2.  Title of the program/major?
3.  What degrees are offer?
4.  How long has the program been in existence?
5.  How many faculty members?
6.  How many staff people maintain hardware & software?
7.  How many students are majoring in computational chemistry?

Thanks very much.
Don Boyd
Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis
Internet boyd@chem.iupui.edu

From hurst@hyper.hyper.com  Fri Jul 29 21:16:06 1994
Received: from seraph.uunet.ca  for hurst@hyper.hyper.com
	by infomeister (8.6.9/930601.1506) id VAA21808; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 21:04:48 GMT
Received: from hyper by mail.uunet.ca with UUCP id <88824-3>; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 17:10:24 -0400
Received: by hyper.hyper.com.hyper.com (931110.SGI/890607.SGI)
	(for ccl.net!CHEMISTRY) id AA19108; Fri, 29 Jul 94 17:08:33 -0400
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 17:08:33 -0400
From: hurst@hyper.hyper.com (Graham Hurst)
Message-Id: <9407292108.AA19108@hyper.hyper.com.hyper.com>
To: Paul A Cahill <pacahil@somnet.sandia.gov>, CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Re:  CCL:Pentium vs. PowerPC speeds for quantum chemistry?


Paul A Cahill <pacahil@somnet.sandia.gov> asks:

> I'm trying to compare the capability of a 32 MB/2GB pentium system that
> costs about $5600 to a PowerPC based IBM RS/6000 that costs more than
> twice as much for the same configuration.  Given that similar codes are
> now available for both, does anyone have *real* tests of computational
> chemistry codes (speed, ease of use).  Will the PowerPC as implemented
> by IBM really provide twice the performance (both are 66 MHz).

The other results that I've seen posted seem to be for FORTRAN codes.
Here are some timings for HyperChem, written in C, for comparison.

MNDO energy and gradient for C60, converged to 1e-2, without DIIS:

Computer                  Time (s)     Rel. speed
486DX 50 MHz                375             1
Pentium 90 MHz              87.6           4.28
SGI Indy 100 Mhz            77.8           4.82
IBM RS/6000-250 66 MHz      51.8           7.24
DEC 3000 200 MHz (I think)  42.4           8.84

The first two numbers are for full HyperChem (user interface and
calculation module) running on the same processor under Windows 3.11.
The last three are for the computation module running on the unix
computer with the HyperChem user interface running on a 486.  All
times are wall clock times for start to finish observed on the PC.

Scaling by 90/66 would make the PowerPC more than twice as fast
as the Pentium, but I would strongly recommend a 90 (or 100) over a
60 or 66 for the Pentium (it's a newer, cooler, chip design).

As far as ease of use, you've certainly got a lot more OS and application
choices for the Pentium (AIX vs DOS, OS/2, NT, several UNIX choices...).

Hope this helps,

Graham
------------
Graham Hurst (hurst@hyper.com)
Hypercube Inc, 7-419 Phillip St, Waterloo, Ont, Canada N2L 3X2 (519)725-4040
Info requests to: info@hyper.com    Support questions to: support@hyper.com
Email group: Send "subscribe hyperchem" to hyperchem-request@hyper.com

From hurst@hyper.hyper.com  Fri Jul 29 21:18:43 1994
Received: from seraph.uunet.ca  for hurst@hyper.hyper.com
	by infomeister (8.6.9/930601.1506) id UAA21528; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 20:37:59 GMT
Received: from hyper by mail.uunet.ca with UUCP id <90416-5>; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 16:43:30 -0400
Received: by hyper.hyper.com.hyper.com (931110.SGI/890607.SGI)
	(for ucmod2.che.uc.EDU!nauss) id AA18830; Fri, 29 Jul 94 16:41:04 -0400
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 16:41:04 -0400
From: hurst@hyper.hyper.com (Graham Hurst)
Message-Id: <9407292041.AA18830@hyper.hyper.com.hyper.com>
To: nauss@ucmod2.che.uc.EDU (Jeffrey L. Nauss)
Subject: Re:  CCL:Hyperchem and IRIX 5.2
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net


Jeffrey Nauss <nauss@ucmod2.che.uc.EDU> asks:

> One of our professors here at UC has been running Hyperchem on a
> Silicon Graphics Indigo R4000.  The version of Hyperchem is the last
> one that was supported on Silicon Graphics workstations.
> 
> Since upgrading to IRIX 5.2 from IRIX 4.0.5 starting Hyperchem results
> in a core dump.  We suspect a fatal incompatibility between Hyperchem
> and IRIX 5.2.  There are no error messages in the syslog file.
> Another program, Spartan, appears to run well.
> 
> Has anyone else seen this problem?  It is very frustrating for our
> professor as he raves about Hyperchem.  However, he prefers the speed
> of his Indigo over the 486 PC which also has Hyperchem.  Right now his
> only alternative is to return to IRIX 4.0.5 which is not completely
> satisfactory due to other considerations.
> 
> Any suggestions will be appreciated.  Thanks in advance.
> 
> 						Jeff Nauss

Many HyperChem users have reported that HyperChem Release 2 for SGI
does not run properly with IRIX 5.2, and SGI has been told about the
problem. HyperChem R2 for SGI was an Autodesk product which Autodesk
dropped last summer and they no longer support it. Now that Autodesk
has returned the HyperChem rights to Hypercube (the HyperChem
developers), Hypercube is evaluating resurrecting HyperChem for SGI,
but has not committed to anything yet.

Hypercube does support running HyperChem molecular mechanics and
quantum mechanics modules on an SGI (or DEC Alpha or IBM RS/6000)
networked to HyperChem running on a PC.  Thus your professor could
run the HyperChem user interface on his PC while the calculations
ran on the Indigo - send email to inof@hyper.com for more details.
(We do support 5.2 for remote back ends.)

Cheers,

Graham Hurst
------------
Graham Hurst (hurst@hyper.com)
Hypercube Inc, 7-419 Phillip St, Waterloo, Ont, Canada N2L 3X2 (519)725-4040
Info requests to: info@hyper.com    Support questions to: support@hyper.com
Email group: Send "subscribe hyperchem" to hyperchem-request@hyper.com

From jle@world.std.com  Fri Jul 29 22:12:28 1994
Received: from ftp.std.com  for jle@world.std.com
	by infomeister (8.6.9/930601.1506) id VAA22375; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 21:58:16 GMT
Received: from world.std.com by ftp.std.com (8.6.8.1/Spike-8-1.0)
	id SAA20198; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 18:03:48 -0400
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0)
	id AA16405; Fri, 29 Jul 1994 17:58:54 -0400
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 17:58:54 -0400
From: jle@world.std.com (Joe M Leonard)
Message-Id: <199407292158.AA16405@world.std.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Me again - this time about STO-3G basis sets...



Folks,

	This time I'm looking to extend the SETUP3.F routine in MOPAC
(and elsewhere) for the 5D, 6S and 6P 3 gaussian coefficients.  There's
a comment/reference to J. Chem. Phys 52,431 (no year) - could somebody
post or email me these numbers???

Joe Leonard
jle@world.std.com

P.S. Yes, I've used MOPAC from time to time - grep for the C$DOIT's
if you want some footprints...

