From patrick@om3.ch.umist.ac.uk  Wed Oct 19 05:21:19 1994
Received: from nessie.mcc.ac.uk  for patrick@om3.ch.umist.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id EAA05248; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 04:58:42 -0400
Received: from om3.ch.umist.ac.uk (actually trigger.ch.umist.ac.uk) 
          by nessie.mcc.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Wed, 19 Oct 1994 09:58:16 +0100
Received: by om3.ch.umist.ac.uk (940406.SGI/) 
          for CHEMISTRY%ccl.net@nessie.mcc.ac.uk id AA02695;
          Wed, 19 Oct 94 10:07:47 +0100
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 10:07:46 +0100 (BST)
From: patrick <patrick@om3.ch.umist.ac.uk>
Subject: MO calculations on Mn complexes
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9410191023.A2691-0100000@trigger.ch.umist.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Dear Netters

Does anybody have any references to M.O. calculations on mixed valence Mn 
dimers or tetramers with O or N ligands attached?

Patrick J O'Malley
Chemistry Dept
UMIST
Manchester



From semper@tdc.dircon.co.uk  Wed Oct 19 06:20:17 1994
Received: from felix.dircon.co.uk  for semper@tdc.dircon.co.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id FAA05267; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 05:00:54 -0400
Received: from semper.dircon.co.uk by felix.dircon.co.uk with SMTP id AA05140
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>); Wed, 19 Oct 1994 09:53:52 +0100
Message-Id: <199410190853.AA05140@felix.dircon.co.uk>
Sender: <semper@tdc.dircon.co.uk>
From: "Oliver Hill" <semper@tdc.dircon.co.uk>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date:          Wed, 19 Oct 1994 09:48:19 GMT
Subject:       Refs for BSSE in MO calcs?
Reply-To: semper@dircon.co.uk
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail/Windows (v1.22)


Dear netters

Please could someone point me to some references (books or papers) 
that deal with  Basis Set Superposition Errors (BSSE) in Ab Initio 
MO calculations. I have been unable to find anything in books so far. 
Any help will be greatly appreciated. I will summarize if there is  sufficient 
interest/responses.

Oliver

PS. I have the postings from 16/17 Oct on BSSE and DFT.
______________________________________________________________________
| Oliver Hill                        |                               |
| Department of Chemistry            | "The true scientist never     |
| University of Cape Town            |  loses the faculty of         |
| Rondebosch, 7700                   |  amazement. It is the essence |
| SOUTH AFRICA                       |  of his(her) being."          |
| E-Mail:oliver@psipsy.uct.ac.za     |                 - HANS SELYE  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     Contact until 24 October 1994                  |
|                                                                    |
| E-Mail: semper@dircon.co.uk        1 Belgrave Place                |
| Tel. +44-71-235-8197               London SW1X 8BU                 |
| Fax. +44-71-823-2112               UNITED KINGDOM                  |
|____________________________________________________________________|

From tom@dingo.niehs.nih.gov  Wed Oct 19 09:21:15 1994
Received: from dingo.niehs.nih.gov  for tom@dingo.niehs.nih.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA07386; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 09:02:54 -0400
Received: by dingo.niehs.nih.gov (920330.SGI/920502.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA15187; Wed, 19 Oct 94 05:59:56 -0700
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 94 05:59:56 -0700
From: tom@dingo.niehs.nih.gov (Thomas M. O'Connell)
Message-Id: <9410191259.AA15187@dingo.niehs.nih.gov>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: RE: MD Constraints


Dear Edgardo,

Regarding your question about extending the conformational
sampling of a MD run using parameter rather than algorithmic
changes I would like to point out the following references.

1) Mass and Step Lenght Optimization for the Calculation
of Equilibrium Properties by MD Simulations
R. Pomes and J. A. McCammon, Chem. Phys. Lett 166(4) 425 1990

This paper discusses the merits of globally increasing the mass
of the atoms so that a longer timestep ( several fs ) can be
used, therefore facilitating longer simulations. The authors found
that the rate of conformational sampling was somewhat reduced with
the increased mass, but the longer dyanmics offsets this somewhat.
This method is best used for calculating equilbrium thermodyamic
properites, but it may be of use to you.

2) Virtual Rigid Body Dynamics
T. Head-Gordon and C. L. Brooks, Biopolymers 31, 77-100, 1991
This paper is probably of more direct relevance to you.  It
describes a method for reduction of the full atomic representation
followed by selectively constraining the system.  This method
is available in XPLOR 3.0 and is described in the manual.

Good Luck,
                Tom O'C.



*******************************************************
  Thomas M. O'Connell Ph.D.                               
  Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics                    
  National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 
  tom@dingo.niehs.nih.gov	 ph  919-541-3872      
                                 fax        -7880      


From noy@tci005.uibk.ac.at  Wed Oct 19 10:22:24 1994
Received: from uibk.ac.at  for noy@tci005.uibk.ac.at
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA08395; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 09:52:58 -0400
Received: from tci005.uibk.ac.at by uibk.ac.at with SMTP id AA01467
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <chemistry@ccl.net>); Wed, 19 Oct 1994 14:52:50 +0100
Received: by tci005.uibk.ac.at (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/CFIBK-2e.AIX)
	id AA30645; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 14:52:48 +0100
From: noy@tci005.uibk.ac.at (Noy)
Message-Id: <9410191352.AA30645@tci005.uibk.ac.at>
Subject: Refs for BSSE calculations
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 14:52:47 +0100 (NFT)
In-Reply-To: <199410190853.AA05140@felix.dircon.co.uk> from "Oliver Hill" at Oct 19, 94 09:48:19 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 2863      


: Please could someone point me to some references (books or papers) 
: that deal with  Basis Set Superposition Errors (BSSE) in Ab Initio 
: MO calculations. I have been unable to find anything in books so far. 
: Any help will be greatly appreciated. I will summarize if there is  sufficient 
: interest/responses.

Hallo,
        I may give ....

1)Behera, L., Kar, T., and Sannigrahi, A.B. (1990). Effect of basis-set 
  superposition on the atomic charges and valencies in hydrogen- and 
  lithium-bonded complexes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 172, 487-493.
 	
        This paper compares two methods for basis set superposition
  error corrections, namely CP (counterpoise) method invented by Boys
  and Bernadi and PCP (polarization counterpoise) method which takes
  only unoccupied orbitals as ghost orbitals.
  
2)Chalasinski, G., Funk, D.J., Simons, J., and Breckenridge, W.H. (1987). 
  Moller-Plesset perturbation theory for van der Waals complexes bound by 
  electron correlation effects: Ground states of the Ar and Mg dimers.
  J. Chem.Phys. 87, 3569-3579.
	
        This paper remarks how significant BSSE is in correlated level.
  The authors encourage the use of CP method as a resolution and 
  well-tempered basis set to reduce BSSE.

3)Hassett, D.M., Marsden, C.J., and Smith, B.J. (1991). The ammonia dimer 
  potential energy surface: resolution of the apparent discrepancy between 
  theory and experiment ? Chem. Phys. Lett. 183, 449-456.

	This is a good example of how BSSE has created inconsistent 
  calculation results of ammonia system.

4)Hobza, P. and Zahradnik, R. (1988). Intermolecular interactions between 
  medium-sized systems. Nonempirical and empirical calculations of 
  interaction energies: Success and failures. Chem. Rev. 88, 871-897.

	A timely review on MO calculation and its obstacles.

5)Kurdi, L., Kochanski, E., and Diercksen, G.H.F. (1985). Determination of 
  the basis set superposition error with "DZP" basis sets in SCF 
  calculations: CO + H2. NH3 + H2, H2 + H2. Chem. Phys. 92, 287-294.
	The paper shows the success of counterpoise method as the best way
  to go for BSSE correction.
                                                            take care,
                                                            Teerakiat

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teerakiat Kerdcharoen (NOY)

Institute of General and Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry
Innrain 52a, A-6020 Innsbruck AUSTRIA
e-mail:  noy@tci2.uibk.ac.at, noy@tci.uibk.ac.at, c72454@cx.uibk.ac.at 
      :  noy@atc.atccu.chula.ac.th, noy@atc2.atccu.chula.ac.th ( Bangkok )
Research :  Molecular Dynamics simulations
         :  Computer Aided Molecular/Material Designs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
***  I have no past and no future. I just have today.
 

From A.W.J.Smith@reading.ac.uk  Wed Oct 19 12:21:17 1994
Received: from mail2.rdg.ac.uk  for A.W.J.Smith@reading.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id LAA11463; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 11:50:49 -0400
Received: from scsscsc1 (actually scsscsc1.rdg.ac.uk) by suma2.rdg.ac.uk 
          with SMTP - Local (PP); Wed, 19 Oct 1994 16:50:10 +0100
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 16:50:05 +0100 (BST)
From: "Andy W. J. Smith" <A.W.J.Smith@reading.ac.uk>
X-Sender: scrasmit@scsscsc1
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: AMoO4 compounds
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941019164224.6924B-100000@scsscsc1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Can anyone point me in the direction of any work on the tunstate or 
molybdate compounds. These are a series of materials including 
A=Co,Ni,Mn in the general formula AMoO4. There are several related 
structure types including wulframite,scheelite and CoMoO4 (Smith 
1969). Any suitable parameters for MM, be it LJ-6-12,
Buckingham (with or without shell model) would be helpful.

Is anyone else working on these types of compounds?
Can anyone recall any relevent papers?

Currently i am tring to reproduce the crystal structures.  I then 
want to conduct some dynamics calculations to determine high temperature  
cation sites and compare the results with  exp. data I have collected.

ANY relevent thoughts appreciated.
   thanks, 
      ANDY





@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
                          Andrew W.J. Smith                            

 Department of Chemistry,                                 
 University of Reading               
 Whiteknights,                      
 Reading,                         Phone: 44 (0)734-875123 ex 7441 or 4195
 Berkshire,                       Email:  A.W.J.Smith@rdg.ac.uk
 RG6 2AD, UK.                     Fax  : 44 (0)734- 311610              

             *  email is most likely to get to me first *
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


From KGRAFTON@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  Wed Oct 19 13:21:22 1994
Received: from aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  for KGRAFTON@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id MAA12456; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 12:26:44 -0400
From: <KGRAFTON@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu>
Message-Id: <199410191626.MAA12456@www.ccl.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 94 11:28 CDT
Subject: AMBER: Are Parm constraints rigid?
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: IN%"CHEMISTRY@ccl.net"



Dear CCLers,

I would like to know if the constraints that may be applied to internal
variables using the CONS option in Parm are indeed a rigid constraint 
(similar to SHAKE) or if these are actually "restraints".

As a side note to this, if these are rigid constraints, why must I include
the force constants in the input section?


Thank you,

Anthony K. Grafton
Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry
University of Oklahoma

From brian@bert.chem.wsu.edu  Wed Oct 19 14:22:21 1994
Received: from serval.net.wsu.edu  for brian@bert.chem.wsu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id NAA14526; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 13:21:24 -0400
Received: by serval.net.wsu.edu; id AA26988; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 10:21:24 -0700
Received: by bert.chem.wsu.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA16816; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 10:21:30 -0700
From: brian@bert.chem.wsu.edu (Brian W. Beck)
Message-Id: <9410191721.AA16816@bert.chem.wsu.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Amber parameters for DMF
To: toba@retina.chem.psu.edu (Sam 'The Towson Tiger' Toba)
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 09:34:21 -0800 (PDT)
Cc: DMF@bert.chem.wsu.edu, potentials@bert.chem.wsu.edu
In-Reply-To: <9410190215.AA15518@retina.chem.psu.edu> from "Sam 'The Towson Tiger' Toba" at Oct 18, 94 10:15:00 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL13]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 991       
Sender: brian@bert.chem.wsu.edu


Sam 'The Towson Tiger' Toba wrote:
: 
: Dear Netters....
: 
: I am trying to simulate Dimethylformamide (DMF) to generate
: a DMF solvent box. Structure is shown below:
: 
	Jorgensen has developed paramters for DMF.

	See:
         Author: Jorgensen-W-L and Swenson-C-J
        Subject: Amide Potentials
         Source: J.Am.Chem.Soc. 107 (1985) p569

	-Brian

-- 
=============================================================================
|   .---------.| Brian W. Beck      |    E-mail Addresses:                  |
|/\ |         ||--------------------| INTERNET    brian@bert.chem.wsu.edu   |
|| \\     WSU || Biochem/Biophysics |   BITNET    F0388913@WSUVMS1          |
|\  -        *|| WSU ,  261 Fulmer  |   DECNET    JAGUAR::F0388913          |
| |           || Pullman, WA        |    VOICE    (509) 335-4083            |
| \___________||       99164-4660   |      FAX    (509) 335-9688            |
=============================================================================


From yuan@nka1.med.uc.edu  Wed Oct 19 16:22:45 1994
Received: from nka1.med.uc.edu  for yuan@nka1.med.uc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id PAA19147; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 15:56:03 -0400
Received: by nka1.med.uc.edu (920330.SGI/921111.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA08505; Wed, 19 Oct 94 15:55:43 -0400
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 15:55:35 +30000
From: Jie Yuan <yuan@nka1.med.uc.edu>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: HOLE
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.90.941019155206.8491A-100000@nka1.med.uc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Hi CCLers!

The HOLE program can calculate pore dimensions by a Metropolis Monte Carlo
mechanism (OS Smart, JM Goodfellow & BA Wallice, Biophys. J., v65, p2456,
1993).  It has been run in conjunction with HYDRA or QUANTA according to
Smart et al.

Has HOLE been implemented in InsightII (Biosym Tech., Inc.) environment?
Is it easy to do so in your opinion?

Regards,

Jie
== Jie Yuan == Pharmacology == U. Cin. == "Jie.Yuan@UC.edu" ==



From vazquez@iqm.unicamp.br  Wed Oct 19 19:21:22 1994
Received: from kalypso.iqm.unicamp.br  for vazquez@iqm.unicamp.br
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id SAA23796; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 18:49:54 -0400
Received: (vazquez@localhost) by kalypso.iqm.unicamp.br (8.6.8/8.3) id TAA00614; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 19:22:31 -0300
From: Pedro A M Vazquez <vazquez@iqm.unicamp.br>
Message-Id: <199410192222.TAA00614@kalypso.iqm.unicamp.br>
Subject: HPCwire News Flash!!! (fwd)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 19:22:30 -0300 (GMT-0300)
Organization: Instituto de Quimica Unicamp
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1510      


Hello

Doe anyone knows the implications of this on the future of xmol?

regards

Pedro

Automated Mailer said:
> From news@tgc.com Wed Oct 19 19:17:26 1994
> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 94 15:44:03 PDT
> From: news@tgc.com (Automated Mailer)
> Message-Id: <9410192244.AA19882@tgc.com>
> To: vazquez@iqm.unicamp.br
> Subject: HPCwire News Flash!!!
> 
> CRAY RESEARCH COMPLETES $10.4 MILLION ACQUISITION of MSCI         Oct. 19
> NEWS FLASH                                                        HPCwire
> =============================================================================
> 
>   Eagan, Minn. -- Cray Research, Inc. completed today the acquisition of
> the Minnesota Supercomputer Center, Inc. (MSCI).
> 
>   Cray Research paid approximately $10.4 million cash to MSCI's owners, the
> University of Minnesota and its Foundation, to acquire MSCI and its assets.
> Most of the current employees at MSCI are expected to stay with Cray, the
> company said, and also confirmed plans to continue the center's operation at
> its current 1200 Washington Avenue South location, in Minneapolis, under the
> current lease with the University.
> 
>   Following the closing, John Carlson, Cray chairman and chief executive
> said, "This acquisition benefits the University, Foundation and Cray, alike.
> The University and Foundation are able to realize substantial value from MSCI
> while simultaneously retaining and expanding access to state-of-the-art
> supercomputing systems for students and faculty members."
> 
> 


From hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA  Wed Oct 19 20:21:23 1994
Received: from condor.CC.UMontreal.CA  for hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id TAA24505; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 19:22:43 -0400
Received: from eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA by condor.CC.UMontreal.CA with SMTP id AA10793
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net); Wed, 19 Oct 1994 19:20:58 -0400
Received: from cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA by eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (940406.SGI/5.17)
	id AA15193; Wed, 19 Oct 94 19:20:57 -0400
Received: by cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA (940406.SGI/5.17)
	id AA24845; Wed, 19 Oct 94 19:20:56 -0400
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 94 19:20:56 -0400
From: hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Hinsen Konrad)
Message-Id: <9410192320.AA24845@cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9410181930.E35262-0100000@ucsub.Colorado.EDU> (message from Garcia Edgardo on Tue, 18 Oct 1994 19:45:03 -0600 (MDT))
Subject: Re: CCL:MD Constraints


Edgardo Garcia writes:

   Is it possible to make a better sampling of
   conformations using MD in which the equations
   or algorithm are not modified but the force
   constants in the model are enlarged ?
   In this way the bonds and angles will
   be forced to stay almost frozen by a pronounced
   potential well ?

That would not help. You would reduce the amplitude of the
oscillations, thereby getting closer to a fixed bond length,
you would at the same time increase the frequency, which
is exactly what you do not want.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen                     | E-Mail: hinsenk@ere.umontreal.ca
Departement de Chimie             | Tel.: +1-514-343-6111 ext. 3953
Universite de Montreal            | Fax:  +1-514-343-7586
C.P. 6128, succ. A                | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/Nederlands/
Montreal (QC) H3C 3J7             | Francais (phase experimentale)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From helden@gaucho.ucsb.edu  Wed Oct 19 22:21:29 1994
Received: from hub.ucsb.edu  for helden@gaucho.ucsb.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id VAA25802; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 21:36:43 -0400
Received: from gaucho.ucsb.edu by hub.ucsb.edu; id AA20241
	sendmail 4.1/UCSB-2.1-sun
	Wed, 19 Oct 94 18:36:41 PDT for chemistry@ccl.net
Received: by gaucho.ucsb.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA30875; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 18:35:07 -0700
From: helden@gaucho.ucsb.edu (Gert von Helden)
Message-Id: <9410200135.AA30875@gaucho.ucsb.edu>
Subject: Dielectric constant and function
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 18:34:56 +22305458 (PDT)
Cc: helden@gaucho.ucsb.edu (Gert von Helden)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1215      



Hi,
I am rather new to the field of molecular modelling and have a 
question or two:
I would like to model some properties of gas phase ions (macromolecules and
small peptides). The charge center is usually a proton or a metal ion. 
The program I am using is SYBYL.
The question i am having is a) out of the many option for charges, which ones 
are good and b) what dielectric constant and function should I use.
I thought that a dielectric constant of 1 (=vacuum) that is constant is best.
The other option is to use a dielectric constant that falls off with 
the distance. However, that seems unphysical to me and I don't see
a justification for doing so. 
Also, looking at the force field, charge - charge induced dipole 
interaction (1/r^4) does not seem to be included. Are there force fields around
where that interaction is included? 

Thanks,  Gert

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Gert von Helden, Dept. of Chemistry, UCSB, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 +
+ Tel   : 805-893-2673, Fax   : 805-893-8703                         +
+ E-mail: helden@gaucho.ucsb.edu                                     +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


