From JOUBERT@physnet.phys.wits.ac.za  Mon Oct 24 02:20:26 1994
Received: from caesar  for JOUBERT@physnet.phys.wits.ac.za
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id CAA12607; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 02:09:54 -0400
Received: from physnet.phys.wits.ac.za ([146.141.20.41]) by caesar (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA13325; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 08:05:30 +0200
Received: from PHYSNET/SpoolDir by physnet.phys.wits.ac.za (Mercury 1.12);
    Mon, 24 Oct 94 8:12:59 GMT +2:00
Received: from SpoolDir by PHYSNET (Mercury 1.12); Mon, 24 Oct 94 8:12:52 GMT +2:00
From: "Daniel " <JOUBERT@physnet.phys.wits.ac.za>
Organization:  Wits University Physics Dept.
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date:          Mon, 24 Oct 1994 08:12:48 GMT + 2:00
Subject:       ESSL Routines
X-Pmrqc:       1
Return-Receipt-To: "Daniel " <JOUBERT@physnet.phys.wits.ac.za>
Priority: normal
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail/Windows (v1.11a)
Message-Id: <41B856322D@physnet.phys.wits.ac.za>
content-length: 654


Hi Netters

Does anyone where to obtain the IBM Engineering and Scientific 
Subroutine Library Routines?  I am interested in the 
Complex Hermitian Matrix diagonalisation and Fast Fourier Transform 
routines both of which are supposed to be very efficient.  

Thank you

Daniel Joubert


**********************************************************************
Daniel Joubert
Department of Physics 
University of the Witwatersrand
P O Wits 2050
Johannesburg
South Africa
Phone: 27-11-7162059 (international)
Fax:   27-11-3398262 (international)
e-mail: joubert@physnet.phys.wits.ac.za
**********************************************************************

From sanja@indigo.irb.hr  Mon Oct 24 04:20:28 1994
Received: from indigo.irb.hr  for sanja@indigo.irb.hr
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id EAA13350; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 04:08:44 -0400
From: <sanja@indigo.irb.hr>
Received: by indigo.irb.hr (920330.SGI/920502.SGI)
	for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA13711; Mon, 24 Oct 94 09:09:00 +0200
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 94 09:09:00 +0200
Message-Id: <9410240709.AA13711@indigo.irb.hr>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: bond_order



   Hy netters,
   
   I am interested in calculating pi bond order.
  Any references on subject will be wellcome.
   Thank you.

   Sincerely,

    Sanja Sekusak



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   Sanja Sekusak                                                      
   Rudjer Boskovic Institute           Phone:  (385-41) 46 10 89      
   P.O.B. 1016                         Fax:    (385-41) 27 26 48
   Zagreb, Croatia                     E-mail: sanja@indigo.irb.hr

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


From medven@olimp.irb.hr  Mon Oct 24 07:20:32 1994
Received: from olimp.irb.hr  for medven@olimp.irb.hr
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id GAA14216; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 06:22:11 -0400
From: <medven@olimp.irb.hr>
Received: by olimp.irb.hr (MX V4.1 VAX) id 59; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 11:21:50 MET-DST
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 1994 11:21:49 MET-DST
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-ID: <009866B9.E71324B4.59@olimp.irb.hr>
Subject: Radical_HOMO/SOMO_problem


Dear netters,

I optimized the geometry of OH radical by applying 2 methods:
a) semiempirical AM1 method, UHF level of theory
b) ab initio, UMP2 and QCISD(T)/6-311+G(2d,p)
The problem is that the eigenvalue of the highest alpha spin orbital 
containing the unpaired electron is lower than the eigenvalue of the
highest beta spin orbital. According to the Koopmans' theorem, the
ionization potential is then given as the negative of the highest 
orbital, being beta spin orbital in this case. Does someone has the 
idea how to interpret these results?


	Zeljka Medven
	Rugjer Boskovic Institute
	Bijenicka 54, POB 1016
	HR-41001 Zagreb, CROATIA
	e-mail:MEDVEN@OLIMP.IRB.HR
	fax:(385-41) 27 26 48
	phone:(385-41) 46 10 89

From czernek@chemi.muni.cz  Mon Oct 24 12:21:52 1994
Received: from aragorn.ics.muni.cz  for czernek@chemi.muni.cz
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id LAA20390; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 11:59:22 -0400
Received: from bilbo.chemi.muni.cz by aragorn.ics.muni.cz with SMTP id AA25958
  (5.67a8/IDA-1.4.4 for <chemistry@ccl.net>); Mon, 24 Oct 1994 16:58:36 +0100
Received: by bilbo.chemi.muni.cz id AA06293
  (5.67a/IDA-1.4.4 for chemistry@ccl.net); Mon, 24 Oct 1994 16:55:13 +0100
Message-Id: <199410241555.AA06293@bilbo.chemi.muni.cz>
Subject: RMS FITTING
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 1994 16:55:12 +0100 (MET)
From: Jiri Czernek <czernek@chemi.muni.cz>
Cc: czernek@chemi.muni.cz (Jiri Czernek)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 648       



     Dear  Netters  ,

I ask you to send me *ANY* informations about theoretical (methods based on
matrix calculations, Lagrange's multipliers, ...) and practical (i.e. about 
respective programs) aspects of

       (root-mean-squared)  FITTING of two rigid structures

(best matching of their coordinates).

I've written my own program and I'm going to test it. Well, I'd be glad to
have a possibility to discuss with you the matter generally and/or the method,
implementation, etc. I used

Thank you in advance.


                                              Cordially ,

                                                  czernek@chemi.muni.cz

From djh@ccl.net  Mon Oct 24 13:20:35 1994
Received: from xipe.ccl.net  for djh@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id NAA21205; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 13:06:29 -0400
From: David Heisterberg <djh@ccl.net>
Received:  for djh@ccl.net
	by xipe.ccl.net (8.6.9/920428.1525) id NAA00364; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 13:06:28 -0400
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 1994 13:06:28 -0400
Message-Id: <199410241706.NAA00364@xipe.ccl.net>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: RE: RMS FITTING
Content-Length: 807


Jiri Czernek <czernek@chemi.muni.cz> writes:
>I ask you to send me *ANY* informations about theoretical (methods based on
>matrix calculations, Lagrange's multipliers, ...) and practical (i.e. about 
>respective programs) aspects of
>       (root-mean-squared)  FITTING of two rigid structures

Just a reminder that there are C and Fortran programs to do this type
of fitting, available on the CCL ftp server in

    /pub/chemistry/software/SOURCES/C/quaternion-mol-fit    and
    /ftp/pub/chemistry/software/SOURCES/FORTRAN/fitest

using a rather nice algorithm, if I do say so myself.
--
David J. Heisterberg (djh@ccl.net)      Gee, it's so beautiful, I gotta
The Ohio Supercomputer Center           give somebody a sock in the jaw.
Columbus, Ohio                          -- Little Skippy (Percy Crosby)

From chamilto@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu  Mon Oct 24 15:20:36 1994
Received: from beauty.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu  for chamilto@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id OAA23450; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 14:33:50 -0400
Received: from localhost by beauty.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (8.6.4/4.940426)
	id OAA23862; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 14:33:47 -0400
From: Craig D Hamilton <chamilto@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Message-Id: <199410241833.OAA23862@beauty.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Subject: PC Molecular Modelling
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 1994 14:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 252       




Does anyone know of MSWindows based molecular modeling programs that will
provide high quality color hard copies of ball and stick molecules? We have
a color bubble jet printer.

Thanks in advance,

     Chuck
     chamilto@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu

From grechtst@pepvax.pepperdine.edu  Mon Oct 24 15:25:53 1994
Received: from pepvax.pepperdine.edu  for grechtst@pepvax.pepperdine.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id PAA24182; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 15:08:57 -0400
Received: by pepvax.pepperdine.edu
    (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4/Pep-5.1) id AA12912
    for chemistry@ccl.net;
    Mon, 24 Oct 1994 12:09:21 -0700
From: Gregory Rechtsteiner <grechtst@pepperdine.edu>
Message-Id: <199410241909.AA12912@pepvax.pepperdine.edu>
Subject: Fitting for Windows
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 94 12:09:20 PDT
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]


Hello:

Is there a program that will fit a sigmoid shape plot (for windows?).
I have a demo of ORIGIN that does it, but I need a presentation graphic
and the demo prints a disclaimer on all graphs.

Does a demo exist that does not do this?
If so, can you let me know or uuencode and send it to me.
I need the graph soon and do not have time to wait for my order from
Microcal for ORIGIN.

Thank you for your help.

gregory

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory A. Rechtsteiner					   Pepperdine University
Research Assistant						 24255 PCH # 572
Fax: 310.456.4314 (work) 				       Malibu, CA. 90263
grechtst@pepvax.pepperdine.edu / grechtst@netcom.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From feng@lisboa.ks.uiuc.edu  Mon Oct 24 22:20:43 1994
Received: from lisboa.ks.uiuc.edu  for feng@lisboa.ks.uiuc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id WAA04439; Mon, 24 Oct 1994 22:17:00 -0400
Received: from leipzig by lisboa.ks.uiuc.edu (NX5.67d/NX3.0M_A)
	id AA28417; Mon, 24 Oct 94 21:19:27 -0500
From: Zhou Feng <feng@lisboa.ks.uiuc.edu>
Message-Id: <9410250219.AA28417@lisboa.ks.uiuc.edu>
Received: by leipzig.ks.uiuc.edu (NX5.67d/NX3.0X)
	id AA27514; Mon, 24 Oct 94 21:19:26 -0500
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 94 21:19:26 -0500
Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.100)
Received: by NeXT Mailer (1.100)
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: particel insertion method
Reply-To: feng@lisboa.ks.uiuc.edu


Hi:

        I am doing a simple  calculation on the solvation energy of lipid head groups in the  
membrane--protein system,   and would be interested if some one could tell me where to find some  
basic references for the particle insertion method for free energy calculation.     The method that I  
am using for the free energy (mostly due to electrostatic interactions ) is the following:    perform a  
simulation  1  for the system with charge set A,   and perform another simulation 2 with charge set  
B.   Then,  calculate the energy difference of changing the charges from  A to B using trajectories  
from simulation 1  to obtain  e1 (A->B),   and similarly calculate the energy difference using  
trajectory 2  e2(A->B).   Finally,  calculate the free energy from the average of these two.    I  
wonder whether anybody has used this kind of method before and whether this is a reasonably  
accurate method to use for solvation energy calculations.   


          I will collect the information I get and post a summary.   Thanks.


Feng

