From jmuilu@joyke7.joensuu.fi  Tue Nov 15 03:26:40 1994
Received: from joyx.joensuu.fi  for jmuilu@joyke7.joensuu.fi
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id CAA13108; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 02:52:25 -0500
Received: by joyx.joensuu.fi (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C)
	id AA18058; Tue, 15 Nov 94 09:46:20 +0200
Received: by joyke7.joensuu.fi (NX5.67d/NeXT-2.0)
	id AA07721; Tue, 15 Nov 94 09:51:53 +0200
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 94 09:51:53 +0200
From: jmuilu@joyke7.joensuu.fi (Juha Muilu)
Message-Id: <9411150751.AA07721@joyke7.joensuu.fi>
Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.100)
Received: by NeXT Mailer (1.100)
To: Tony Dyson <tony@schroeder.newcastle.edu.au>, CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Gaussian-92 system performance numbers?


Tony,
I have compiled  some g92 timings from several sources. Here is
the summary: 


Computer                Proc    MHz     Nproc   LP      178     G92 Version
                                                Mflops  min
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SGI Indigo/32Mb         R4000   50/100  1       16      111     RevC.3          

SGI Indigo/32Mb         R4400   75/150  1       24      80      RevC.3          

IBM RS6000 590/256MB    Power2  66      1       132(*   20      RevB    

IBM RS6000 590/256MB    Power2  66      1       132(*   17      RevG3   

IBM RS6000 380/32MB     Power2  57      1       50      45      RevB 

IBM RS6000 370          Power   62      1       26      57                      

IBM RS6000 550          Power   42      1       26      61                      

IBM RS6000 540          Power   30      1       19      83                      

IBM RS6000 32H/16MB     Power   25      1       12      134     RevB            

DEC 3000 AXP 800/Unix   Alpha   200     1               44      RevE.2
DEC 3000 300            Alpha   150     1               144             

DEC 3000 500X           Alpha   200     1               59              

DEC 3000 AXP 400/VMS    Alpha   133     1       26      90      RevG.2  

Cray X-MP EA/432                117     1       66      17               

CRAY C90 8/256                  ~250    1               4.25    RevC.3          

CRAY C90 8/256(incore)          ~250    1               1.5     RevC.3          

CRAY YMP EL                     34      1               39               

Convex C3840                    37      1               39               

Convex C3840                    37      2               39               


*)  with VAST-preprocessor ?

Nproc) Number of processors used.
LP )   Linpack DP (100x100).  

178)   Test 178 from g92 test suite. 

       Elapsed wall clock time in minutes. 

       (Should be close to CPU+system time, when Nproc = 1)
       Number of basis functions:  300
       SCF iterations: 8
       Input stream:
       %mem=2000000
       #P RHF/6-31G** scf=direct test pop=npa prop=fit

       Gaussian 92 Test Job 178:
       TATB rhf/6-31g**//hf/6-31g**
       Energy should be -1006.2213391
----------------
Best Regards,
   

   Juha Muilu

   Department of Chemistry,University of Joensuu,P.O. Box 111
   80101 Joensuu,FINLAND
   Email:Juha.Muilu@joensuu.fi (NeXT mail ok)
   Phone:358-73-1513312,Fax:358-73-1513390


From rachelle@picard.niehs.nih.gov  Tue Nov 15 10:26:48 1994
Received: from kamakazi.niehs.nih.gov  for rachelle@picard.niehs.nih.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA15752; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 09:37:44 -0500
Received: from picard.niehs.nih.gov by kamakazi.niehs.nih.gov via SMTP (920330.SGI/920502.SGI.AUTO)
	for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA04622; Tue, 15 Nov 94 09:32:13 -0500
Received: by picard.niehs.nih.gov (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for @kamakazi.niehs.nih.gov:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA01889; Tue, 15 Nov 94 09:37:33 -0500
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 94 09:37:33 -0500
From: rachelle@picard.niehs.nih.gov (Rachelle J. Bienstock)
Message-Id: <9411151437.AA01889@picard.niehs.nih.gov>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Zn potentials in biomolecular modeling....



HI-

I would like to know what people have been using for Zn potentials in
modeling Zn containing proteins.  I have noticed that none of the Biosym
forcefields nor AMBER contains potentials for Zn.  If people develop
their own potentials for these purposes, I would appreciate knowing
how they then place them in the AMBER or any of the BIOSYM forcefields
to use for molecular dynamics.  

Also, if someone knows whether any other forcefields which are suited
for proteins contain potentials for Zn, I would appreciate knowing...
i.e. such as Molecular Simulations, MacroModel or GROMOS...

Thanks,

Rachelle

                                #####
                                (o  o)
 +------------------------oooO---(__)---Oooo----------------------------+
 | 									|
 | Dr. Rachelle Bienstock	INTERNET :rachelle@picard.niehs.nih.gov	|
 | National Institute of						|
 | Environmental Health Sciences					|
 | P.O. Box 12233 Mail Drop 10-03	Telephone : 919-541-3397	|
 | Research Triangle Park, NC 27709	Fax : 919-541-1578		|
 +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
                               ||    ||
                              (__)  (__)



From ernst@bkfug.kfunigraz.ac.at  Tue Nov 15 12:26:50 1994
Received: from bkfug.kfunigraz.ac.at  for ernst@bkfug.kfunigraz.ac.at
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id LAA17645; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 11:27:40 -0500
Received: by bkfug.kfunigraz.ac.at (MX V4.0-1 AXP) id 1; Tue, 15 Nov 1994
          17:28:05 --0100
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 17:28:04 --0100
From: MARGOT <ernst@bkfug.kfunigraz.ac.at>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-ID: <00987836.B69243C2.1@bkfug.kfunigraz.ac.at>
Subject: R. Bader's Program


Hi, 

I'm looking for information on the program written by Richard Bader
for charge-density partitioning. My group here in Graz had a copy 
of it before my time, and it got lost due to a disk crash. We'd like 
to replace it; any pointers, any way to contact the author(s) would 
be much appreciated. 

Thanks,
		margot

From DEPAZ@vm1.sdi.uam.es  Tue Nov 15 12:33:12 1994
Received: from vm1.sdi.uam.es  for DEPAZ@vm1.sdi.uam.es
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id LAA17622; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 11:27:22 -0500
Message-Id: <199411151627.LAA17622@www.ccl.net>
Received: from vm1.sdi.uam.es by vm1.sdi.uam.es (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 2123; Tue, 15 Nov 94 17:26:07 HOE
Received: from vm1.sdi.uam.es (DEPAZ) by vm1.sdi.uam.es (Mailer R2.08) with
 BSMTP id 4940; Tue, 15 Nov 94 17:26:05 HOE
Date:         Tue, 15 Nov 94 17:22:49 HOE
From: "Dr. Jose Luis Garcia de Paz" <DEPAZ@vm1.sdi.uam.es>
Organization: Native address: <DEPAZ@EMDUAM11.BITNET>
Subject:      shareware version of Mopac for osf/1
To: CCL List <chemistry@ccl.net>


Dear CCL'ers,


Can anybody tell me where can I get a shareware version of MOPAC
suitable to run in DEC OSF/1 operating system?. Does it include
easy instructions to compile, for non expert users?. I have access
to internet.
  Thank you very much. Regards,

                                   Jose

                                 Dr. Jose Luis Garcia de Paz
                                 (34) (1) 3974957. FAX (34) (1) 3974512.
                                 Departamento de Quimica Fisica Aplicada.
                                 FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS, C-XIV-602.
                                 Universidad Autonoma de MAdrid.
                                 28049-Madrid (Spain).

From rs0thp@rohmhaas.com  Tue Nov 15 15:27:20 1994
Received: from monte.br.rohmhaas.com  for rs0thp@rohmhaas.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id PAA21402; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 15:11:59 -0500
Received: by monte.br.rohmhaas.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA20436; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 15:05:19 -0500
From: rs0thp@rohmhaas.com (Dr. Tom Pierce)
Message-Id: <9411152005.AA20436@monte.br.rohmhaas.com>
Subject: mol file conversions to XYZ?
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 15:05:18 -0500 (EST)
Cc: rdruker@rohmhaas.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 419       


Dear CCLers,

Is there any software free or commercial that converts mol file
format connection tables (from the NCI database) to approximate
XYZ coordinates? 

Thanks. I will summarize and repost if you send responses to my email 
address THPierce@RohmHaas.Com.
-- 
Sincerely, Thomas Pierce - THPierce@RohmHaas.Com  -  Computational Chemist
"These opinions are those of the writer and not the Rohm and Haas Company."


From BILLINGS@UConnVM.UConn.Edu  Tue Nov 15 16:26:56 1994
Received: from phem3  for BILLINGS@UConnVM.UConn.Edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id PAA22684; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 15:51:39 -0500
Received: from UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU (MAILER@UCONNVM) by phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu
 (PMDF V4.2-13 #5888) id <01HJIIAYAGPC8YEEUJ@phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu>; Tue,
 15 Nov 1994 15:51:35 EST
Received: from UConnVM.UConn.Edu (BILLINGS) by UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU (Mailer R2.08
 R208004) with BSMTP id 8931; Tue, 15 Nov 94 14:43:21 EST
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 14:40:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Eric Billings <BILLINGS@UConnVM.UConn.Edu>
Subject: MOPAC Cu Complex questions
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HJIIAYAQCI8YEEUJ@phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT



Hello fellow netters:

We have been using MOPAC (AM1 hamiltonian) to generate partial
charges on a tetradentate dinegative ligand that has a metal
binding site and a separate protonation site (an amine).  The
ligand has one plane of symmetry.  We have used sparkles to
mimic the charge polarization of the metal center since we have
been unable to locate parameters for copper (I and II).

                /CH2-C=O
      +    CH2-NH    O
    H3N \ /     \   /
         C       Cu(I/II)
    H3C / \     /   \
           CH2-NH    O
                \CH2-C=O

We have two questions:
1. Are there MOPAC parameters for Cu I and II available ?
2. Can anyone help explain why MOPAC is able to converge in
   three of the four cases below - but fail on the fourth.



We have found the following:
1. When the ++ sparkle is used, and the protonation site is
protonated (-NH3+) the set of partial charges obtained reflects
the symmetry of the ligand. (Total molecular charge: +1)

2. When the ++ sparkle is used, and the protonation site is
unprotonated (-NH2) the set of partial charges obtained reflects
the symmetry of the ligand. (Total molecular charge: 0)

3.When a + sparkle is used, and the protonation site is protonated,
a set of charges is obtained which also properly reflects ligand
symmetry. (Total molecular charge: 0)

4. However, when a + sparkle and no protonation is used, MOPAC
cannot converge with a total molecular charge: -1.  However, if
CHARGE=-0.999 is used, convergence is achieved with questionable
results.  Specifically, the partial charges do not reflect the
symmetry of the molecule.  This result appears to be chemically
unreasonable.

In addition, the assymetry of the partial charges in (4) can be
reversed simply by rotating the -NH2 group around its C-N axis.
We would appreciate suggestions about any fixes for this problem,
or  discussion about the result.

Please respond to me directly and I'll summarize if folks are
interested.  We've included the input file for the difficult
case below.
 Thanks !!!   - Eric

Eric Billings
Biophysics Grad Student
UCONN
Billings@uconnvm.uconn.edu

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's the file that converges with CHARGE=-0.999 (but not -1)
and produces the asymmetric charges.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
GRAPH UHF CHARGE=-0.999 AM1 1SCF
INSIGHT generated AMPAC/MOPAC input file
DATE: Fri Nov  4 15:19:28 1994
 +    0.000000 0    0.000000 0    0.000000 0  0  0  0
 O    3.945394 0    0.000000 0    0.000000 0  1  0  0
 N    1.988805 0   63.980175 0    0.000000 0  1  2  0
 C    1.243780 0   21.286814 0   11.840311 0  2  3  1
 C    2.483390 0   95.464783 0  177.089172 0  3  1  4
 C    2.741488 0  155.718201 0  172.258453 0  1  3  4
 O    2.069859 0   98.706131 0  -90.481331 0  1  3  4
 O    1.959568 0   83.935295 0   97.237152 0  1  3  7
 O    1.954638 0  172.158951 0   76.167824 0  1  3  8
 O    1.222477 0  123.999367 0  178.865356 0  6  9  1
 N    1.998371 0   95.456062 0  166.698486 0  1  3  8
 N    1.512800 0  138.539734 0 -136.269485 0  5  3  1
 C    1.476681 0  104.733261 0 -164.992844 0  3  1 11
 C    1.468735 0  117.143456 0  -38.470036 0  3  1 11
 C    1.529775 0  112.715981 0  -70.285004 0  5 14  3
 C    1.519738 0  116.683731 0   -1.443380 0  6  9  1
 C    1.516491 0  112.850174 0   59.862339 0  5 14  3
 H    0.847857 0  105.924355 0   85.132477 0  3  1 11
 H    0.852142 0  104.861160 0  -84.707642 0 11  1  3
 H    0.971031 0  110.465836 0  -54.648548 0 12  5 14
 H    0.898043 0  112.369568 0 -179.796890 0 12  5 14
 H    0.939738 0  109.942955 0   74.964302 0 13  3  1
 H    0.869576 0  109.047089 0 -157.552032 0 13  3  1
 H    0.983221 0  107.203888 0  -61.799381 0 14  3  1
 H    0.912557 0  110.428726 0  176.152573 0 14  3  1
 H    0.931023 0  109.966446 0  -49.515186 0 15  5 14
 H    0.900946 0  110.653557 0 -169.862305 0 15  5 14
 H    0.944812 0  109.929031 0  -90.911400 0 16 11  1
 H    0.881151 0  109.577477 0  148.162247 0 16 11  1
 H    0.930954 0  112.317932 0  -61.163052 0 17  5 14
 H    0.964762 0  109.814117 0   55.678158 0 17  5 14
 H    1.001573 0  109.777176 0  175.788788 0 17  5 14
 H    0.942113 0  106.874374 0 -179.980927 0  7  1  3
 H    1.210611 0  104.268616 0   69.931961 0  7  1  3
-------------------------------------------------------------------

From stoutepf@chemsci1.es.dupont.com  Tue Nov 15 18:26:51 1994
Received: from gatekeeper.es.dupont.com  for stoutepf@chemsci1.es.dupont.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id RAA24791; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 17:57:29 -0500
Received: by gatekeeper.es.dupont.com; id AA18878; Tue, 15 Nov 94 17:57:17 -0500
Received: from [158.117.153.76] by chemsci1.es.dupont.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA24113; Tue, 15 Nov 94 17:54:17 EST
Message-Id: <9411152254.AA24113@chemsci1.es.dupont.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To: stoutepf@chemsci1.es.dupont.com
X-Organization: The Du Pont Merck Pharmaceutical Company
X-Mailer: Eudora 1.4
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 17:57:11 -0500
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: stoutepf@chemsci1.es.dupont.com (Pieter Stouten)
Subject: Structural comparison of coagulation cascade serine proteases
Cc: hodgecn@lldmpc.dnet.dupont.com (Nick Hodge)


Dear Netters,

My request may not be really computational in nature. I am looking for
recent papers that deal with:

1) a structural comparison of serine proteases in the coagulation cascade
and/or:
2) homology modelling of those enzymes.

Failing that references to structural comparisons or homology modelling of
serine proteases in general would be highly appreciated.

Thanks a million.

Cheers, Pieter.


Pieter Stouten, Senior Research Scientist    ||
Computer Aided Drug Design Group             ||
The Du Pont Merck Pharmaceutical Company     ||    Adventures get spoiled
P.O. Box 80353, Wilmington, DE 19880-0353    ||   by being reduced to data
Phone: +1 (302) 695 3515                     ||             --
Fax: +1 (302) 695 2813                       ||        Poul Anderson
E-mail: stoutepf@chemsci1.es.dupont.com      ||
Internet Shogi Server: kzinti                ||



From lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com  Tue Nov 15 19:26:51 1994
Received: from Kodak.COM  for lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id TAA25447; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 19:15:08 -0500
From: <lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com>
Received: from euler.kodak.com by Kodak.COM (5.61+/2.1-Eastman Kodak)
	id AA19087; Tue, 15 Nov 94 13:41:22 -0500
Reply-To: lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com
Received: from xd88.kodak.com by euler.kodak.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/931108.SGI.ANONFTP)
	for @kodakr.Kodak.COM:chemistry@ccl.net id AA24081; Tue, 15 Nov 94 12:28:25 -0500
Received: by xd88.kodak.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA15954; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 12:17:28 -0500
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 12:17:28 -0500
Message-Id: <9411151217.ZM18000@xd88.kodak.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0.0 15dec93)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Additional Gaussian Timings for TEST0178
Cc: Mckelvey@Kodak.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0


Netters:

Several addenda for recent benchmarkings of Gaussian G3 and TEST0178

SGI/R8000	16 Min (By Roberto Gomperts at SGI)
IBM 590/pwr2	17 Min (Kodak)
IBM 390/pwr2	41 Min (Kodak; Same executable images as for 590/pwr2)
90 Mhz Pentium 600 Min (Kodak; Micronics mb with 512K cache and 32MB memory)


Regards

-- 

John M. McKelvey			email: mckelvey@Kodak.COM
Computational Science Laboratory	phone: (716) 477-3335
2nd Floor, Bldg 83, RL
Eastman Kodak Company			
Rochester, NY 14650-2216

--


From tps@iris27.biosym.com  Tue Nov 15 20:27:01 1994
Received: from bioc1.biosym.com  for tps@iris27.biosym.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id UAA25965; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 20:06:00 -0500
Received: from iris27.biosym.com by bioc1.biosym.com (5.64/0.0)
	id AA13590; Tue, 15 Nov 94 17:05:30 -0800
Received: by iris27.biosym.com (931110.SGI/930416.SGI)
	for @bioc1.biosym.com:chemistry@ccl.net id AA14590; Tue, 15 Nov 94 17:05:10 -0800
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 94 17:05:10 -0800
From: tps@iris27.biosym.com (Tom Stockfisch)
Message-Id: <9411160105.AA14590@iris27.biosym.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: Zn potentials in biomolecular modeling


chelle@picard.niehs.nih.gov (Rachelle J. Bienstock) writes:
> I would like to know what people have been using for Zn potentials in
> modeling Zn containing proteins.  I have noticed that none of the Biosym
> forcefields nor AMBER contains potentials for Zn.

The CFF93 force field released by the Potential Energy Functions Consortium
at Biosym has parameters for Zn, as well as the metal ions

        Ca Cs Cu Fe K Li Mg Na Rb

--
Tom Stockfisch, BIOSYM Technologies	tps@biosym.com


From lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com  Tue Nov 15 21:26:53 1994
Received: from Kodak.COM  for lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id UAA26244; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 20:49:42 -0500
From: <lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com>
Received: from euler.kodak.com by Kodak.COM (5.61+/2.1-Eastman Kodak)
	id AA03694; Tue, 15 Nov 94 16:10:43 -0500
Reply-To: lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com
Received: from xd88.kodak.com by euler.kodak.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/931108.SGI.ANONFTP)
	for @kodakr.Kodak.COM:chemistry@ccl.net id AA24613; Tue, 15 Nov 94 16:05:27 -0500
Received: by xd88.kodak.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA17629; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 15:54:33 -0500
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 15:54:33 -0500
Message-Id: <9411151554.ZM16091@xd88.kodak.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0.0 15dec93)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Symposium on Semi-Empirical Theory
Cc: McKelvey@Kodak.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0


Netters:

ACS Symposium on Parameterisations in Semi-Empirical Theory
Chicago ACS Meeting, August 20-24, 1995.

Just to keep you up to date:

Speakers:  Walter Thiel, James Stewart, Karl Jug, Andreas Klamt, Michael
Zerner,
	   Andy Holder, Warren Hehre, Chris Cramer, Don Truhlar, Karl Freed,
	   and Steve Dixon.

The topics will cover a background of the current EHT, ZDO and NDDO
parameterisations, for ground and excited states, for various basis sets,
several solvation methods, and some future directions of all valence methods.

It is anticipated that it will cover 1 1/2 days.

I will post a more complete schedule later!

See you there!

Regards,


-- 

John M. McKelvey			email: mckelvey@Kodak.COM
Computational Science Laboratory	phone: (716) 477-3335
2nd Floor, Bldg 83, RL
Eastman Kodak Company			
Rochester, NY 14650-2216

--


From jsb2@camsci.com  Tue Nov 15 22:26:56 1994
Received: from camsci.com  for jsb2@camsci.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id VAA27644; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 21:53:55 -0500
From: <jsb2@camsci.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 94 21:53:05 EST
Received: by camsci.com (4.1/3.1.090690-Cambridge Scientific Computing)
	id AA08121; Tue, 15 Nov 94 21:53:05 EST
Message-Id: <9411160253.AA08121@camsci.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net, rs0thp@rohmhaas.com
Subject: Re:  CCL:mol file conversions to XYZ?
Cc: rdruker@rohmhaas.com


>Is there any software free or commercial that converts mol file
>format connection tables (from the NCI database) to approximate
>XYZ coordinates?


The boring answer is that CS Chem3D Pro will do this.

I'm working on the more interesting answer. It should be possible to script 
Chem3D to convert a whole bunch of these structures automatically, using 
AppleScript. I am pretty sure this can be done, but I don't really have much 
time to spend on it at the moment. Does anyone feel like taking a crack at it?

Using ChemFinder, it should even be able to retain the CAS IDs.

(additional information about both programs is available at
http://www.camsci.com)

Jonathan Brecher
Cambridge Scientific Computing, Inc.
jsb@camsci.com

