From fdeprof@is1.vub.ac.be  Tue Nov 22 02:13:48 1994
Received: from rc29  for fdeprof@is1.vub.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id BAA05339; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 01:54:21 -0500
Received: from rc1 by rc29 (8.6.8.1/2.24.ap)
        id IAA24262; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 08:07:21 +0100
Received: from is1e.vub.ac.be by rc1 (8.6.8.1/2.24.ap)
        id HAA17438; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 07:55:55 +0100
Received: from sterfpmc207.vub.ac.be by is1e.vub.ac.be (5.61/BFUCC-920211)
	id AA03676; Tue, 22 Nov 94 07:52:25 +0100
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 07:52:25 +0100
Message-Id: <9411220652.AA03676@is1e.vub.ac.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: fdeprof@is1.vub.ac.be
Subject: summary sodalite cage


Hi all,

Some weeks ago, I posted the message :

"I'm looking for coordinates of the sodalite cage and (if possible) other
structural units in zeolite type systems for the use in quantum chemical
calculations.  Is there anyone who could share this information with me ?
I will summarize for the net."

This were the answers I received (Sorry for the long interval between the
posting and the summary) :

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. From jxh@biosym.com (Joerg Hill)

Hi Frank,
I have done some quantum chemical calculations on zeolite structural units
(including the sodalite cage; J.-R. Hill and J. Sauer, J. Phys. Chem., 1994,
98, 1238). Here are the DZP(Si,H)/TZP(O) optimized coordinates (the cage is
terminated by H).

------------------------------- sodalite.car -----------------------------------
    4.26248187045149       .00000000000000      8.47411357122116      si
     .00000000000000      4.26248187045148      8.47411357122116      si
   -4.26248187045149       .00000000000000      8.47411357122116      si
     .00000000000000     -4.26248187045149      8.47411357122116      si
    8.47411357122116      4.26248187045149       .00000000000000      si
    8.47411357122116       .00000000000000      4.26248187045149      si
    8.47411357122116     -4.26248187045149       .00000000000000      si
    8.47411357122116       .00000000000000     -4.26248187045149      si
   -4.26248187045148      8.47411357122116       .00000000000000      si
     .00000000000000      8.47411357122116      4.26248187045149      si
    4.26248187045149      8.47411357122116       .00000000000000      si
     .00000000000000      8.47411357122116     -4.26248187045149      si
   -8.47411357122116     -4.26248187045148       .00000000000000      si
   -8.47411357122116       .00000000000000      4.26248187045149      si
   -8.47411357122116      4.26248187045149       .00000000000000      si
   -8.47411357122116       .00000000000000     -4.26248187045149      si
    4.26248187045148     -8.47411357122116       .00000000000000      si
     .00000000000000     -8.47411357122116      4.26248187045149      si
   -4.26248187045149     -8.47411357122116       .00000000000000      si
     .00000000000000     -8.47411357122116     -4.26248187045149      si
     .00000000000000      4.26248187045148     -8.47411357122116      si
    4.26248187045149       .00000000000000     -8.47411357122116      si
     .00000000000000     -4.26248187045149     -8.47411357122116      si
   -4.26248187045149       .00000000000000     -8.47411357122116      si
    2.46344202815581      2.46344202815581      8.55474340250725      o
   -2.46344202815581      2.46344202815581      8.55474340250725      o
   -2.46344202815581     -2.46344202815581      8.55474340250725      o
    2.46344202815581     -2.46344202815581      8.55474340250725      o
    8.55474340250725      2.46344202815581      2.46344202815581      o
    8.55474340250725     -2.46344202815581      2.46344202815581      o
    8.55474340250725     -2.46344202815581     -2.46344202815581      o
    8.55474340250725      2.46344202815581     -2.46344202815581      o
   -2.46344202815581      8.55474340250725      2.46344202815581      o
    2.46344202815581      8.55474340250725      2.46344202815581      o
    2.46344202815581      8.55474340250725     -2.46344202815581      o
   -2.46344202815581      8.55474340250725     -2.46344202815581      o
   -8.55474340250725     -2.46344202815581      2.46344202815581      o
   -8.55474340250725      2.46344202815581      2.46344202815581      o
   -8.55474340250725      2.46344202815581     -2.46344202815581      o
   -8.55474340250725     -2.46344202815581     -2.46344202815581      o
    2.46344202815581     -8.55474340250725      2.46344202815581      o
   -2.46344202815581     -8.55474340250725      2.46344202815581      o
   -2.46344202815581     -8.55474340250725     -2.46344202815581      o
    2.46344202815581     -8.55474340250725     -2.46344202815581      o
    2.46344202815581      2.46344202815581     -8.55474340250725      o
    2.46344202815581     -2.46344202815581     -8.55474340250725      o
   -2.46344202815581     -2.46344202815581     -8.55474340250725      o
   -2.46344202815581      2.46344202815581     -8.55474340250725      o
    5.96225421097381       .00000000000000      5.96225421097381      o
     .00000000000000      5.96225421097381      5.96225421097381      o
   -5.96225421097381       .00000000000000      5.96225421097381      o
     .00000000000000     -5.96225421097381      5.96225421097381      o
    5.96225421097381      5.96225421097381       .00000000000000      o
    5.96225421097381     -5.96225421097381       .00000000000000      o
    5.96225421097381       .00000000000000     -5.96225421097381      o
   -5.96225421097381      5.96225421097381       .00000000000000      o
     .00000000000000      5.96225421097381     -5.96225421097381      o
   -5.96225421097381     -5.96225421097381       .00000000000000      o
   -5.96225421097381       .00000000000000     -5.96225421097381      o
     .00000000000000     -5.96225421097381     -5.96225421097381      o
    6.16861312564238       .00000000000000     10.87623055509236      o
     .00000000000000      6.16861312564238     10.87623055509237      o
   -6.16861312564238       .00000000000000     10.87623055509236      o
     .00000000000000     -6.16861312564238     10.87623055509236      o
   10.87623055509236      6.16861312564238       .00000000000000      o
   10.87623055509236       .00000000000000      6.16861312564238      o
   10.87623055509236     -6.16861312564238       .00000000000000      o
   10.87623055509236       .00000000000000     -6.16861312564238      o
   -6.16861312564238     10.87623055509236       .00000000000000      o
     .00000000000000     10.87623055509236      6.16861312564238      o
    6.16861312564238     10.87623055509236       .00000000000000      o
     .00000000000000     10.87623055509236     -6.16861312564238      o
  -10.87623055509236     -6.16861312564238       .00000000000000      o
  -10.87623055509236       .00000000000000      6.16861312564238      o
  -10.87623055509236      6.16861312564238       .00000000000000      o
  -10.87623055509236       .00000000000000     -6.16861312564238      o
    6.16861312564238    -10.87623055509237       .00000000000000      o
     .00000000000000    -10.87623055509236      6.16861312564238      o
   -6.16861312564239    -10.87623055509236       .00000000000000      o
     .00000000000000    -10.87623055509236     -6.16861312564238      o
     .00000000000000      6.16861312564238    -10.87623055509237      o
    6.16861312564238       .00000000000000    -10.87623055509236      o
     .00000000000000     -6.16861312564238    -10.87623055509236      o
   -6.16861312564238       .00000000000000    -10.87623055509236      o
    5.53602640599796       .00000000000000     12.54436774570000      h
     .00000000000000      5.53602640599796     12.54436774570000      h
   -5.53602640599796       .00000000000000     12.54436774570000      h
     .00000000000000     -5.53602640599796     12.54436774569999      h
   12.54436774570000      5.53602640599796       .00000000000000      h
   12.54436774570000       .00000000000000      5.53602640599796      h
   12.54436774570000     -5.53602640599796       .00000000000000      h
   12.54436774570000       .00000000000000     -5.53602640599796      h
   -5.53602640599796     12.54436774570000       .00000000000000      h
     .00000000000000     12.54436774570000      5.53602640599796      h
    5.53602640599796     12.54436774570000       .00000000000000      h
     .00000000000000     12.54436774570000     -5.53602640599796      h
  -12.54436774570000     -5.53602640599796       .00000000000000      h
  -12.54436774570000       .00000000000000      5.53602640599796      h
  -12.54436774570000      5.53602640599796       .00000000000000      h
  -12.54436774570000       .00000000000000     -5.53602640599796      h
    5.53602640599796    -12.54436774570000       .00000000000000      h
     .00000000000000    -12.54436774570000      5.53602640599796      h
   -5.53602640599796    -12.54436774569999       .00000000000000      h
     .00000000000000    -12.54436774570000     -5.53602640599796      h
     .00000000000000      5.53602640599796    -12.54436774570000      h
    5.53602640599796       .00000000000000    -12.54436774570000      h
     .00000000000000     -5.53602640599796    -12.54436774569999      h
   -5.53602640599796       .00000000000000    -12.54436774570000      h
---------------------------------- EOF -----------------------------------------

The coordinates are in atomic units. I hope this helps.

Joerg-R. Hill

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. From fh@qc.ag-berlin.mpg.de (Frank Haase)

Hi frank,

i can provide you with the cartesian coordinates of a sodalite cage saturated
with OH groups and SCF/DZP optimized (see Hill, Sauer, JPC 1994, (98), 1238).
so if you're interested e-mail me and i'll send you the coords.

frank haase

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. From latour@telemann.scf.fundp.ac.be

first: sodalite structure

    8.890    8.890    8.890    90.0    90.0    90.0
Si1       0.25        0.5         0.0
Al1       0.25        0.0         0.5
O1        0.1397      0.1506      0.4399

   P-43n (No. 218) 24 operators
   1.   0.   0.   0.   1.   0.   0.   0.   1.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
  -1.   0.   0.   0.  -1.   0.   0.   0.   1.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
  -1.   0.   0.   0.   1.   0.   0.   0.  -1.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
   1.   0.   0.   0.  -1.   0.   0.   0.  -1.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
   0.   0.   1.   1.   0.   0.   0.   1.   0.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
   0.   0.   1.  -1.   0.   0.   0.  -1.   0.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
   0.   0.  -1.  -1.   0.   0.   0.   1.   0.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
   0.   0.  -1.   1.   0.   0.   0.  -1.   0.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
   0.   1.   0.   0.   0.   1.   1.   0.   0.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
   0.  -1.   0.   0.   0.   1.  -1.   0.   0.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
   0.   1.   0.   0.   0.  -1.  -1.   0.   0.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
   0.  -1.   0.   0.   0.  -1.   1.   0.   0.        0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
   0.   1.   0.   1.   0.   0.   0.   0.   1.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
   0.  -1.   0.  -1.   0.   0.   0.   0.   1.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
   0.   1.   0.  -1.   0.   0.   0.   0.  -1.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
   0.  -1.   0.   1.   0.   0.   0.   0.  -1.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
   1.   0.   0.   0.   0.   1.   0.   1.   0.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
  -1.   0.   0.   0.   0.   1.   0.  -1.   0.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
  -1.   0.   0.   0.   0.  -1.   0.   1.   0.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
   1.   0.   0.   0.   0.  -1.   0.  -1.   0.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
   0.   0.   1.   0.   1.   0.   1.   0.   0.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
   0.   0.   1.   0.  -1.   0.  -1.   0.   0.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
   0.   0.  -1.   0.   1.   0.  -1.   0.   0.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000
   0.   0.  -1.   0.  -1.   0.   1.   0.   0.        0.50000   0.50000   0.50000

I. Hassan and H. D. Grundy, Acta Cryst., C39, 3-5 (1983).

second: adjacency matrix of sodalite cage

 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0

this is the adjacency matrix, it should be a truncated octaedron (please check
it, I may have mistyped some item(s) !). This graph represents only the T
atoms connectivity.

Thibaud Latour

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. From iyer@moe.che.uc.EDU (Karthik Iyer)

Hi,
        Enclosed you will find a list of cartesian coordinates for the
sodalite unit cell. There are 12 Si and 24 O atoms in the cubic unit cell with
a=8.91angstroms. The first 12 refer to the Si atoms( charge of +4) and the
nnext 24 to oxygens. Hope this helps.
.25d0 .50d0 0.d0 4.d0
0.d0  .25d0 .50d0 4.d0
.50d0 0.d0 .25d0 4.d0
.25d0 0.d0 .50d0 4.d0
.50d0 .25d0 0.d0 4.d0
0.d0 .50d0 .25d0 4.d0
.75d0 0.d0 .5d0  4.d0
.5d0 .75d0 0.d0  4.d0
0.d0 .5d0 .75d0  4.d0
.75d0 .5d0 0.d0  4.d0
0.d0 .75d0 .5d0  4.d0
.5d0 0.d0 .75d0  4.d0
.142d0 .142d0 .440d0 -2.d0
.440d0 .142d0 .142d0 -2.d0
.142d0 .440d0 .142d0 -2.d0
.858d0 .142d0 .560d0 -2.d0
.560d0 .142d0 .858d0 -2.d0
.858d0 .440d0 .858d0 -2.d0
.142d0 .858d0 .560d0 -2.d0
.440d0 .858d0 .858d0 -2.d0
.142d0 .560d0 .858d0 -2.d0
.858d0 .858d0 .440d0 -2.d0
.560d0 .858d0 .142d0 -2.d0
.858d0 .560d0 .142d0 -2.d0
.642d0 .642d0 .940d0 -2.d0
.940d0 .642d0 .642d0 -2.d0
.642d0 .940d0 .642d0 -2.d0
.358d0 .642d0 .060d0 -2.d0
.060d0 .642d0 .358d0 -2.d0
.358d0 .940d0 .358d0 -2.d0
.642d0 .358d0 .060d0  -2.d0
.940d0 .358d0 .358d0  -2.d0
.642d0 .060d0 .358d0 -2.d0
.358d0 .358d0 .940d0 -2.d0
.060d0 .358d0 .642d0 -2.d0
.358d0 .060d0 .642d0 -2.d0
Karthik A. Iyer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many thanks to all the People who responded to my posting, also the people
not mentioned in this summary.

Frank






From ungsik@radon.sait.samsung.co.kr  Tue Nov 22 06:13:51 1994
Received: from han.hana.nm.kr  for ungsik@radon.sait.samsung.co.kr
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id FAA06659; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 05:46:05 -0500
Received: from  (saitgw.sait.samsung.co.kr) by han.hana.nm.kr (4.1/KUM-0.1)
	id AA00300; Tue, 22 Nov 94 19:01:50 KST
Received: from radon.sait.samsung.co.kr by  (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA10366; Tue, 22 Nov 94 19:09:56 KST
Received: by radon.sait.samsung.co.kr (931110.SGI/920502.SGI)
	for @saitgw.sait.samsung.co.kr:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA10901; Tue, 22 Nov 94 19:09:15 +0900
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 19:09:15 +0900
From: ungsik@radon.sait.samsung.co.kr (Ungsik Yu)
Message-Id: <9411221009.AA10901@radon.sait.samsung.co.kr>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Ti/Zr atom force field


About two weeks ago I asked about the force field parameters for Ti and
Zr atoms. Followings are the summary of reply I received.

##########################################################################

>From lohrenz@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca  Thu Nov 10 02:04:40 1994

Hi Ungsik,

I am interested in this as well. Could you send me the references you 
got? There is a AMBER-set by Hoeweler and Erker:
U. Hoeweler, R. Mohr, M. Knickmeier, G. Erker, Organometallics 1994, 13,
2380-2390.

John

email: lohrenz@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca

##########################################################################

>From aholder@CCTR.UMKC.EDU  Thu Nov 10 10:01:56 1994

Dear Dr. Yu,

  Our SAM1 method will soon be available for the transition metals you
mention.  Our interface includes the ligands that you mention as pre-
minimized AM1 structures which can easily be constructed into the 
molecules you are intertested in.  I will send you a brochure abbout 
AMPAC.

  Andy Holder

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                    DR. ANDREW HOLDER
                   President, Semichem

Semichem, Inc.            ||  Internet Addr: aholder@vax1.umkc.edu
7128 Summit               ||  Phone Number:  (913) 268-3271
Shawnee, KS,  66216       ||  FAX Number:    (913) 268-3445
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

##########################################################################

>From liese@jolt.mpx.com.au  Thu Nov 10 15:59:34 1994

The new esff forcefield contains parameters for Ti and Zr - 
please see the 235 release notes


regards

Anneliese Palmer
Biosym, Australia

##########################################################################

Dr. Warren J. Hehre at Dept. of Chemistry, Univ. of California, Irvine
and Wavefunctions, Inc said their SPARTAN package has AM1(tm), PM3(tm)
parameters for Ti, and Zr atoms.

One person at Cray said that they have paramters for the stretching modes.


##########################################################################

I wish to express my gratitude to people who answered me.

Ungsik Yu.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ungsik Yu, Ph.D.             ungsik@radon.sait.samsung.co.kr
Samsung Adv. Inst. Tech.     P.O. Box 111, Suwon, 440-600, KOREA
Tel: 82-331-280-8255         Fax: 82-331-280-9158
----------------------------------------------------------------


From Thomas.Bally@unifr.ch  Tue Nov 22 10:13:59 1994
Received: from swifr9  for Thomas.Bally@unifr.ch
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA09216; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 09:36:04 -0500
Received: from sgpch1.unifr.ch by swifr9 with SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 22 Nov 1994 15:35:56 +0100
Received: from mtalk1_rep5_per_a1.unifr.ch by sgpch1.unifr.ch 
          via SMTP (940715.SGI.52/920502.SGI.AUTO) 
          for @mailserver1.unifr.ch:chemistry@ccl.net id AA28857;
          Tue, 22 Nov 94 15:34:37 +0100
Message-Id: <9411221434.AA28857@sgpch1.unifr.ch>
X-Sender: bally@sgpch1.unifr.ch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 15:37:19 +0100
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: Thomas.Bally@unifr.ch (Thomas Bally)
Subject: open-shell force fields


Dear Netters,

  we are attempting to fit force fields of open-shell species (triplet
carbenes, radicals, radical ions) starting from Hessians computed by
some quantum chemical procedure and we face the problem that UHF and
ROHF often give *very* different valence force fields (in spite of the
fact that the geometries often do not differ that much). In cases of
large <S**2> values, we wish to avoid UMP2 and the available R(O)MP2
codes (Cadpac, Aces) often give us nonsensical results.

  Is anyone aware of any systematic studies which have been conducted
to assess the reliability of ROHF vs. UHF (or any other methods such
as DFT) for force fields or vibrational frequencies of open-shell species?

  Please reply to my personal e-mail address, I will post a summary to
the net if I get any useful hints.

  Thanks for your help!

  thomas


*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
|  Prof. Thomas Bally                 |  E-mail:  Thomas.Bally@unifr.ch   |
|  Institute for Physical Chemistry   |                                   |
|  University of Fribourg             |                                   |
|  Perolles                           |  Tel:     011-41-37 826 489       |
|  CH-1700 FRIBOURG                   |  FAX:     011-41-37 826 488       |
|  Switzerland                        |                                   |
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*




From rs0thp@rohmhaas.com  Tue Nov 22 11:13:57 1994
Received: from monte.br.rohmhaas.com  for rs0thp@rohmhaas.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id KAA10052; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 10:24:09 -0500
Received: by monte.br.rohmhaas.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA28409; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 10:17:37 -0500
From: rs0thp@rohmhaas.com (Dr. Tom Pierce)
Message-Id: <9411221517.AA28409@monte.br.rohmhaas.com>
Subject: RE: CCL:DEFECTIVE PENTIUM FPU'S
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 10:17:37 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 431       


Dear Pentium testers and wanna-bes,

Will the test 
"Z=X-(X/Y)*Y = 256,  FOR X=4195835 AND Y=3145727, supposed to be 0"
work from excel 5.0 or will I have to get a fortran compiler?
if so, can you uuencode an small program that I could use
>from DOS 6.22 to "test" pentiums?
-- 
Sincerely, Thomas Pierce - THPierce@RohmHaas.Com  -  Computational Chemist
"These opinions are those of the writer and not the Rohm and Haas Company."


From zhou@chem.columbia.edu  Tue Nov 22 15:13:55 1994
Received: from cucbs.chem.columbia.edu  for zhou@chem.columbia.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id OAA15257; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 14:36:01 -0500
From: <zhou@chem.columbia.edu>
Received: from quito.chem.columbia.edu by cucbs.chem.columbia.edu with SMTP id AA12258
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>); Tue, 22 Nov 1994 14:40:13 -0500
Received: by quito.chem.columbia.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA27975; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 14:13:47 -0500
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 14:13:47 -0500
Message-Id: <9411221913.AA27975@quito.chem.columbia.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: FMM code



Hello. How are you.

We are doing molecular dynamics of protein using MD with Multiple-Time-Step Algorithm (RESPA). Now, we
hope to include Fast-Multiple-Method (FMM) in our electrostatic calculations.

Does anyone have a free code for FMM subroutine or know where to get one?
Or, does anyone have interest to collaborate with us to write a particular subroutine for the software
we are using, MacroModel.

                            Ruhong (Richard) Zhou 
                            Prof. B. J. Berne's group
                            Dept. of Chem. & Center for Biomol. Simul.
                            Columbia University, NY 10027
                           
                            Tel: 212-854-5650
                            email: zhou@nile.chem.columbia.edu

From hyper@sentex.net  Tue Nov 22 17:14:00 1994
Received: from granite.sentex.net  for hyper@sentex.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id RAA17604; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 17:01:16 -0500
Received: (from hyper@localhost) by granite.sentex.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id NAA04488; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 13:02:58 -0800
Received: by hyper.hyper.com.hyper.com (920330.SGI/890607.SGI)
	(for ccl.net!chemistry) id AA13122; Tue, 22 Nov 94 16:28:25 -0500
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 16:28:25 -0500
From: hurst@hyper.hyper.com (Graham Hurst)
Message-Id: <9411222128.AA13122@hyper.hyper.com.hyper.com>
To: <jin@isotope.ch.ntu.edu.tw>, chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re:  CCL:program for calculating  nuclear shielding


Bih-Yaw Jin <jin@isotope.ch.ntu.edu.tw> writes:

> Hi, 
> 
> I'm looking for information on the program for calculating nuclear
> shielding by means of the CNDO or INDO method.  Any pointers, would be
> much appreciated. Please reply to my email address at 
> jin@isotope.ch.ntu.edu.tw.
> 
> Thanks,
> 	Bih-Yaw Jin

The HyperNMR program from Hypercube uses reparameterized CNDO or INDO
to calculate nuclear shielding, as well as spin-spin coupling constants.
Accuracy is improved, at the expense of parameterization difficulty
and loss of generality, by borrowing the idea of atom types from molecular
mechanics.  Thus, for example, instead of using the same parameters for
all carbons, different parameters are used depending on the chemical
environment of the carbon.

For product information about HyperNMR send email to info@hyper.com.
For questions on details of the science developed and implemented in
HyperNMR, please send email to Yufei Guo <guo@hyper.com>.

Cheers,

Graham
------------
Graham Hurst (hurst@hyper.com)
Hypercube Inc, 7-419 Phillip St, Waterloo, Ont, Canada N2L 3X2 (519)725-4040
Info requests to: info@hyper.com    Support questions to: support@hyper.com
Email group: Send "subscribe hyperchem" to hyperchem-request@hyper.com

From lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com  Tue Nov 22 18:15:15 1994
Received: from Kodak.COM  for lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id SAA18290; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 18:10:05 -0500
From: <lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com>
Received: from euler.kodak.com by Kodak.COM (5.61+/2.1-Eastman Kodak)
	id AA10190; Tue, 22 Nov 94 15:28:42 -0500
Reply-To: lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com
Received: from xd88.kodak.com by euler.kodak.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/931108.SGI.ANONFTP)
	for @kodakr.Kodak.COM:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA14099; Tue, 22 Nov 94 13:56:48 -0500
Received: by xd88.kodak.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA12575; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 13:47:18 -0500
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 13:47:18 -0500
Message-Id: <9411221347.ZM15133@xd88.kodak.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0.0 15dec93)
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: PENTIUM GLITCH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0


NETTERS:

1) THE REPORT OF THE GLITCH WE REPORTED YESTERDAY ORIGINATED FROM CLEVE MOLER
AT MATHWORKS.

2) YESTERDAY WE VERIFIED IT USING REAL*8 WITH A WATCOM COMPILER.

3) TODAY I VERIFIED IT USING THE CALCULATOR IN WINDOWS/ACCESSORIES!

REGARDS...

-- 

John M. McKelvey			email: mckelvey@Kodak.COM
Computational Science Laboratory	phone: (716) 477-3335
2nd Floor, Bldg 83, RL
Eastman Kodak Company			
Rochester, NY 14650-2216

--


