From Andrepeter.Heiner@vtt.fi  Fri Dec  2 04:16:33 1994
Received: from vtt.fi  for Andrepeter.Heiner@vtt.fi
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id DAA03236; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 03:51:49 -0500
Received: from geeni.bel.vtt.fi (bel.vtt.fi [130.188.30.1]) by vtt.fi (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA00992 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 10:51:23 +0200
Received: by geeni.bel.vtt.fi (920330.SGI/1.1.geeni)
	id AA01821; Fri, 2 Dec 94 10:47:39 GMT
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 10:47:39 GMT
From: Andrepeter.Heiner@vtt.fi (Andrepeter Heiner)
Message-Id: <9412021047.AA01821@geeni.bel.vtt.fi>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:PENTIUM BUG



Netters,

considering the bug in de FPU of the Pentium, I think we have arrived at a most
strange relation between supplier and and user. So far all software has been 
delivered without a warranty for good functioning, but to my knowledge no
supplier ever sold software containing a bug he knew of. Intel, being one of 
the main hardware suppliers on the market, for some reason, thinks they can 
get away with that and leaves the proof of a ill-functioning processor to the
end-user. I suggest all PENTIUM-owners just send their processor back because
it is going to be too silly for words that in research articles the author
has to state the processors serial number, or state the result of the bug-test,
in order to have his results be taken seriously by colleagues. To cut a long 
story short, Intel is morally obliged to replace ill-functioning processors, 
unless they want to make a joke of the "Intel Inside" slogan.
This does not take away the responsibility of the scientist to carefully examine
the results we get.

Sincerely,

Andrepeter.


From STEVENSA@CSOVAX.PORTSMOUTH.AC.UK  Fri Dec  2 05:16:40 1994
Received: from sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk  for STEVENSA@CSOVAX.PORTSMOUTH.AC.UK
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id FAA03617; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 05:02:12 -0500
Message-Id: <199412021002.FAA03617@www.ccl.net>
Via: uk.ac.portsmouth.csovax; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:57:13 +0000
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 9:56 GMT
From: "ADRIAN STEVENS, DEPT. OF CHEMISTRY, UNI. OF PORTSMOUTH" <STEVENSA@CSOVAX.PORTSMOUTH.AC.UK>
To: CHEMISTRY <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Introductory Q.S.A.R. References.?


Dear Netters,

I am sorry if I am asking a FAQ, but I am looking for some sort of
introductory book/review that discusses Q.S.A.R. techniques.
(A particular slant that may be helpful would be w.r.t. enzymes)

Could people please mail to me directly and when I have enough, I shall
send a list of responses to the net.

Nb., Please quote 'QSAR Response' in the Subject heading to help me.

Thanks to all,

Adrian.

###########################################################
Adrian Stevens             #
                           #
Phd Research Student,      # Tel: (01 705) 876543 Ext. 2121
Department of Chemistry,   # Fax: (01 705) 842510
University of Portsmouth,  #
St. Michael's Building,    # 
White Swan Road,           # E-mail: stevensa@cv.port.ac.uk
Portsmouth, UK, PO1 2DT.   #
                           #
###########################################################

From dirk@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl  Fri Dec  2 06:16:34 1994
Received: from rulway.LeidenUniv.nl  for dirk@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id FAA03897; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 05:25:20 -0500
Received: from rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl by rulway.LeidenUniv.nl with SMTP id AA27499
  (5.65c+/IDA-1.4.4 for <@RULWAY.LEIDENUNIV.NL:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>); Fri, 2 Dec 1994 11:25:09 +0100
Received: by rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl (920330.SGI/920502.SGI)
	for @RULWAY.LEIDENUNIV.NL:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA13725; Fri, 2 Dec 94 11:26:20 GMT
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 11:26:20 GMT
From: dirk@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl (Dirk Huckriede)
Message-Id: <9412021126.AA13725@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Xmol



Hello All,

Where can I obtain a copy of the Xmol program ?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Dirk Huckriede                    
                                   
 Computational Chemistry Courseware
 Gorlaeus Laboratories             
 Leiden University                 
                                   
 P.O. Box    9502                Phone : +31 71 274505             
 2300 RA   Leiden                  Fax : +31 71 274488             
 The  Netherlands               E-mail : dirk@rulglj.leidenuniv.nl 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"to be or nut^H^H^H -- sh^Gt, how do I delete..^?^?^? Oh No Oh NO^D^D^D -- How
do I get out of this thing anyway^C^C^C Kill it^Z^Z^Z (mumble mumble)
Bus error (core dumped)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From rlm1003@cus.cam.ac.uk  Fri Dec  2 10:16:51 1994
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk  for rlm1003@cus.cam.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA06174; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:49:16 -0500
Received: from apus.cus.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.2] (TAP id = root) 
	by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk with smtp 
	(Smail-3.1.28.1 #256) id m0rDZIN-000BzkC; Fri, 2 Dec 94 14:49 GMT
Received: by apus.cus.cam.ac.uk 
	(Smail-3.1.28.1 #256) id m0rDZIM-00034FC; Fri, 2 Dec 94 14:49 GMT
Message-Id: <m0rDZIM-00034FC@apus.cus.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 14:49 GMT
From: rlm1003@cus.cam.ac.uk (R.L. Mancera)
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:  BRUGEL package



Hello netters,

	I would like to get hold of the BRUGEL simulation package, developed
in the Free University of Brussels by van Belle, Wodak and coworkers, but I
haven't been able to get any response from these people.  Could anyone out
there tell me how to get this software and/or who to contact ?  An e-mail
address would also be very helpful.  Thank you in advance for your help.

	Yours,

	Ricardo L. Mancera
	Department of Chemistry
	University of Cambridge
	Lensfield Road
	Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK

E-mail:  rlm1003@cus.cam.ac.uk
Phone:  +44 (1223) 336353
Fax:  +44 (1223) 336362

From rs0thp@rohmhaas.com  Fri Dec  2 10:21:20 1994
Received: from monte.br.rohmhaas.com  for rs0thp@rohmhaas.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA05988; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:40:12 -0500
Received: by monte.br.rohmhaas.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA29638; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:33:45 -0500
From: rs0thp@rohmhaas.com (Dr. Tom Pierce)
Message-Id: <9412021433.AA29638@monte.br.rohmhaas.com>
Subject: Re: CCL:Polymer Chain Rigidity
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:33:45 -0500 (EST)
Cc: psubram@texaco.com (Palavo Subramanian)
In-Reply-To: <9412012012.AA27050@texaco.com> from "Palavo Subramanian" at Dec 1, 94 02:12:41 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1277      


Previously, Palavo Subramanian wrote:
>  What is a good way to 'quantify' polymer chain rigidity ?. I am looking
> at comparing the rigidity of Polymer A as a function of temperature and
> also as a function of composition(monomer ratio in the case of a copolymer).
> Is there a good way to calculate this? Is Persistence Length a good measure
> of the rigidity?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> --Mani--
> -- Original Sender Envelope Address: psubram@texaco.com

A good way to quantify rigidity depends on what you will experimentally
measure as 'rigid'.  The most compelling measures correlate with experiments.

Interesting measures are:
     Radius of Gyration
     Variance of Radius of Gyration
     End-to-end distances
     Variance of end-to-end distances
     Characteristic ratio (Cinfinity)
     Kuhn segment (or Persistence Length)
     
These are single chain estimates, returning to what does rigid mean,
if you are interested in packing effects then volume calculations 
might be useful.  

Note that the relationship of Radius of Gyration to End-to_end
distance will tell you "how" gaussian your chains are. 


-- 
Sincerely, Thomas Pierce - THPierce@RohmHaas.Com  -  Computational Chemist
"These opinions are those of the writer and not the Rohm and Haas Company."


From hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA  Fri Dec  2 10:22:05 1994
Received: from condor.CC.UMontreal.CA  for hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA05432; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:17:06 -0500
Received: from eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA by condor.CC.UMontreal.CA with SMTP id AA14025
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for chemistry@ccl.net); Fri, 2 Dec 1994 09:15:02 -0500
Received: from cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA by eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (940406.SGI/5.17)
	id AA15334; Fri, 2 Dec 94 09:15:01 -0500
Received: by cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA (940406.SGI/5.17)
	id AA13638; Fri, 2 Dec 94 09:15:00 -0500
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 09:15:00 -0500
From: hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Hinsen Konrad)
Message-Id: <9412021415.AA13638@cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA>
To: Andrepeter.Heiner@vtt.fi
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <9412021047.AA01821@geeni.bel.vtt.fi> (Andrepeter.Heiner@vtt.fi)
Subject: Re: CCL:PENTIUM BUG



   strange relation between supplier and and user. So far all software has been 
   delivered without a warranty for good functioning, but to my knowledge no
   supplier ever sold software containing a bug he knew of. Intel, being one of 

On the contrary, this is the norm rather than an exception. Most software
packages contain bugs that the vendor knows about - it would be unreasonable
to stop distribution of a program at every bug report. Instead, bugs are
fixed in so-called "maintenance" releases from time to time.

However, many suppliers in specialist markets (like science) will at
least inform their customers about bugs and ways to circumvent them until
the next release is ready. And of course they will make the bug fixes
available to everyone - not just to those who sent a bug report.

   it is going to be too silly for words that in research articles the author
   has to state the processors serial number, or state the result of the bug-test,
   in order to have his results be taken seriously by colleagues. To cut a long 

I am afraid that this is going to happen.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen                     | E-Mail: hinsenk@ere.umontreal.ca
Departement de Chimie             | Tel.: +1-514-343-6111 ext. 3953
Universite de Montreal            | Fax:  +1-514-343-7586
C.P. 6128, succ. A                | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/Nederlands/
Montreal (QC) H3C 3J7             | Francais (phase experimentale)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From pettsj@visigoth.demon.co.uk  Fri Dec  2 10:22:41 1994
Received: from post.demon.co.uk  for pettsj@visigoth.demon.co.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id KAA06450; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 10:07:31 -0500
Received: from visigoth.demon.co.uk by post.demon.co.uk id aa05232;
          2 Dec 94 15:07 GMT
X-Sender:  (Unverified)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 03:07:51 +0000
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: James Petts <pettsj@visigoth.demon.co.uk>
Subject: The Pentium Bug
Message-ID:  <9412021507.aa05232@post.demon.co.uk>


Found this on the net today. Reposting with permission...

Q&A:  THE PENTIUM FDIV BUG

Q:  How many Pentium designers does it take to screw in a light bulb?
A:  1.99904274017, but that's close enough for non-technical people.

Q:  What do you get when you cross a Pentium PC with a  research grant?
A:  A mad scientist.

Q:  What's another name for the "Intel Inside" sticker they put on
    Pentiums?
A:  The warning label.

Q:  What do you call a series of FDIV instructions on a Pentium?
A:  Successive approximations.

Q:  Complete the following word analogy:  Add is to Subtract as Multiply
    is to:
        1)  Divide
        2)  ROUND
        3)  RANDOM
        4)  On a Pentium, all of the above
A:  Number 4.

Q:  What algorithm did Intel use in the Pentium's floating point divider?
A:  "Life is like a box of chocolates." (Source: F. Gump of Intel)

Q:  Why didn't Intel call the Pentium the 586?
A:  Because they added 486 and 100 on the first Pentium and got
    585.999983605.

Q:  According to Intel, the Pentium conforms to the IEEE standards 754
    and 854 for floating point arithmetic.  If you fly in aircraft
    designed using a Pentium, what is the correct pronunciation of "IEEE"?
A:  Aaaaaaaiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeee!


TOP TEN NEW INTEL SLOGANS FOR THE PENTIUM
 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  9.9999973251   It's a FLAW, Dammit, not a Bug
  8.9999163362   It's Close Enough, We Say So
  7.9999414610   Nearly 300 Correct Opcodes
  6.9999831538   You Don't Need to Know What's Inside
  5.9999835137   Redefining the PC -- and Mathematics As Well
  4.9999999021   We Fixed It, Really
  3.9998245917   Division Considered Harmful
  2.9991523619   Why Do You Think They Call It *Floating* Point?
  1.9999103517   We're Looking for a Few Good Flaws
  0.9999999998   The Errata Inside


--
=== James Petts ===
In the world of CD-ROM, a horse will always be an herbivorous quadruped,
and there'll be endless examples to prove just that. But that world will
never tell you how it feels to ride a horse.
Or fall off it.



From JMOSCOSO@uop.com  Fri Dec  2 12:20:41 1994
Received: from uop.com  for JMOSCOSO@uop.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id MAA08632; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 12:02:23 -0500
Received: from disney.dp.uop-net.com ([138.90.72.74]) by uop.com (4.1/3.1.090690-UOP)
	id AA04258; Fri, 2 Dec 94 11:08:32 CST
Received: from mktserv.uop-net.com (mhs-smtp) by disney.dp.uop-net.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA13356; Thu, 1 Dec 94 13:17:10 CST
Message-Id: <9412011917.AA13356@disney.dp.uop-net.com>
From: JMOSCOSO@uop.com (JMOSCOSO)
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 94 12:32
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: N2O3 STRUCTURE
Return-Receipt-To: JMOSCOSO@uop.com


Hello Netters:
I need to get any references for N2O3: like structure, bond
lengths, bond angles, single and double bonds, electronic 
configuration, any info is welcome

Thank you for your reply.

Jaime Moscoso

JMOSCOSO@uop.com
FAX: 708-391-3727
Phone 708-391-3769
UOP
Des Plaines IL


From doherty@msc.edu  Fri Dec  2 12:28:25 1994
Received: from noc.msc.edu  for doherty@msc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id LAA07822; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 11:23:29 -0500
Received: from uh.msc.edu by noc.msc.edu (5.65/MSC/v3.0.1(920324))
	id AA04366; Fri, 2 Dec 94 10:23:25 -0600
Received: from mac3.msc.edu by uh.msc.edu (5.65/MSC/v3.1r(920220))
	id AA02005; Fri, 2 Dec 94 10:20:21 -0600
Message-Id: <9412021620.AA02005@uh.msc.edu>
X-Sender: doherty@uh.msc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 10:21:50 -0500
To: dirk@rulglj.LeidenUniv.nl (Dirk Huckriede), CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
From: doherty@msc.edu (David C. Doherty)
Subject: Re: CCL:Xmol


At 11:26 AM 12/2/94 +0000, Dirk Huckriede wrote:

>Where can I obtain a copy of the Xmol program ?

Instructions for downloading and installing XMol
may be obtained at:

   ftp://ftp.msc.edu/pub/xmol/README

An online, hypertext version of the User's Guide,
tutorial, etc. can be found at:

   http://www.arc.umn.edu/GVL/Software/xmol/XMol.html

This site will soon be updated with a Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQ) section. This will feature such favorites
as:

  "Is there a version of XMol for [DEC Alpha, HP, and
   Linux...]?"

   [preview: no, no, and           no...]

--

  While I'm here, some of you may recall that I once requested
geographic locations of sites using XMol.  This was intended
to help us prepare an animation of the worldwide downloads of
XMol for part of an episode of the PBS show "Newton's Apple."
The segment, which features XMol, looks at how scientists use
the internet.  Here in the Twin Cities, this episode will
be shown on 12 Dec. at 19:00 CST.  I've been informed by my
mother that it has already been aired on the New York City
affiliate (a science teacher at the high school at which she
teaches asked her what her son's first name is...).

  So if you live in the US (or North America or wherever else
Newton's Apple is seen), and you want your kids to get a taste
of your life on the Internet, I suggest calling your local
PBS affiliate and inquiring when the "Internet Newton's Apple"
segment is showing.  They should know what you mean.

(now, if this post communicating to you about a TV show about
scientists communicating isn't an example of Life imitating
Art imitating Life...)
--

  Finally, someone on this list asked what might be the effect on
XMol of the acquistion of the Minnesota Supercompter Center, Inc.
by Cray Research, Inc.  Any effects on future versions and/or
distribution of XMol by this event have not been determined.
When this becomes clear, we'll make an announcement in this
forum.

--

  Thanks for putting up with the long post and I now return
you to your regularly scheduled Perfervid Pentium Pandemonium
(or should that be just Pentiumonium?).

...hmm..this post was so chock full of information, I wonder if
it qualifies me for a special e-mail request dispensation...nah...
...thanks and keep up the good work Jan...thanks for the Pentium
humo(u)r Tom...why did Scientific American call you, Henry?...

;)


---
David C. Doherty
Minnesota Supercomputer Center, Inc.
doherty@msc.edu



From garciae@ucsub.Colorado.EDU  Fri Dec  2 17:16:42 1994
Received: from ucsub.Colorado.EDU  for garciae@ucsub.Colorado.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id QAA13159; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 16:49:17 -0500
Received: (from garciae@localhost) by ucsub.Colorado.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9/CNS-3.5) id OAA15599; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 14:48:32 -0700
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 14:48:26 -0700 (MST)
From: Garcia Edgardo <garciae@ucsub.Colorado.EDU>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: CCL: VDW parameters
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.941202143103.65145A-100000@ucsub.Colorado.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Dear netters,

Can anybody send me some comments (or point some references) on: 

1. Which are "good" Lenard-Jones (12-6) parameters
   for carbons (C_3,C_2,C_1) and explicit hydrogens in alkanes ?

2. How can VDW parameters be obtained from ab initio
   calculations ? 

Thanks in advance.



Edgardo Garcia
Cristol Chem & Biochem
Univ. of Colorado at Boulder
Boulder CO USA



