From laaksone@csc.fi  Thu Feb  2 01:41:39 1995
Received: from finsun.csc.fi  for laaksone@csc.fi
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id BAA04340; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 01:26:39 -0500
Received: by finsun.csc.fi id AA06077
  (5.65c8+/IDA-1.4.4 for chemistry@ccl.net); Thu, 2 Feb 1995 08:26:33 +0200
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 08:26:33 +0200 (EET)
From: Leif Laaksonen <laaksone@csc.fi>
Subject: Chemistry on PC:s
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9502020859.A6028-0100000@finsun.csc.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




Dear Computational Chemists,

Now when I can see that it's fully allowed to discuss about the Web on
the CCL list I would like to ask the user community about a problem,
which is strictly speaking not chemistry, I have not been able to
solve myself.

I believe there has always been a sort of ambivalent relation between
(graphics)workstations and the PC:s. Workstations used to be Unix machines
and the PC:s were DOS/Windows or Macintosh machines. Unix had all the
nice networking (TCP/IP) features included so it was also very easy to
network them. The graphics workstations again had also very powerful
graphics boards so they could be used for demanding display purposes.

The drawback for the PC:s (in the beginning) was the lack of standard
networking hardware, software and 3D graphics libraries which
prevented the PC:s to be taken "seriously" in the computational
fields. I just want to remind you about the discussion here in CCL
list about the HyperChem program, some time ago. However, things have
changed a lot during the last years. Today we have PC operating
systems like Windows NT or OS/2 (Warp) which allows us to combine all
the PC/Windows programs available today with the networking power
TCP/IP gives us. Windows NT even has the SGI 3D graphics library
OpenGL which allows us to run (almost) the same applications on a PC
today that we used to run on Unix machines yesterday. Soon we will
even have special OpenGL graphics boards which allow us to run
graphics applications much faster than today.

My question is now, is there any demand (need) to write graphics
programs for computation chemists for the PC (Windows NT) market? I am
talking about client/server programs where the graphics would be
sitting on the PC and the computationally intensive parts would be
done on other machines.  This would give us the possibility to cut and
past graphics and data direct to PC applications like word processors
or spreadsheets. If everybody already has a Unix graphics workstation
in front of them I would not expect the PC business be worth too much
(for the computational chemists) but if people still use PC:s
regularly there might still be some interest.

One further aspect is also the fact that we can also run Windows NT
on "real" graphics workstations today. However, I don't know about
any computational chemistry applications ported to the graphics
workstation/Windows NT platform. Would any of you want to change
the Unix on your graphics workstation into Windows NT? 

If you have any opinions/ideas about these things, please let me know.

Thank you very much for your help.

Regards,

-leif laaksonen

Ps. I know about the Linux software for the PC:s but Linux does not so far
    allow me to run PC/Windows applications.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leif Laaksonen                     |  
Center for Scientific Computing    | Phone:      358 0 4572378
P.O. Box 405                       | Mobile:     358 400425203
FIN-02101 Espoo                    | Telefax:    358 0 4572302
FINLAND                            | Mail:  Leif.Laaksonen@csc.fi
---------URL: http://laaksonen.csc.fi/leif.laaksonen.html----------

              I dreamed that, as I wandered by the way,
              Bare winter suddenly was changed to spring.

                                    P.B. Shelley
-------------------------------------------------------------------



From HRUSAK@jh-inst.cas.cz  Thu Feb  2 02:41:40 1995
Received: from uivt1.uivt.cas.cz  for HRUSAK@jh-inst.cas.cz
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id CAA04830; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 02:02:12 -0500
Received: from bob223.jh-inst.cas.cz ([147.231.28.65]) by uivt1.uivt.cas.cz (4.0/SONY-4.0MX)
	id AA08636; Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:00:24 +0100
Received: from BOB/MAILQUEUE by bob223.jh-inst.cas.cz (Mercury 1.20);
    2 Feb 95 08:00:57 GMT+1
Received: from MAILQUEUE by BOB (Mercury 1.20); 2 Feb 95 08:00:39 GMT+1
From: "Dr. Jan Hrusak" <HRUSAK@jh-inst.cas.cz>
Organization:  Institute of Physical Chemistry
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date:          Thu, 2 Feb 1995 08:00:37 +0100
Subject:       DFT anions ?
Return-Receipt-To: "Dr. Jan Hrusak" <HRUSAK@jh-inst.cas.cz>
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail/Windows (v1.22)
Message-Id: <2864F1007A@bob223.jh-inst.cas.cz>


Dear Neters,

could somebody in the list point me to a reference for DFT 
applicaions to molecular anions.

Jan Hrusak


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Jan Hrusak                               ###############################
J. Heyrovsky Institute of Physical Chemistry ## MEMOR ESTO CONGREGATIONIS ##
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic    ##   TVAE QVAM POSSEDISTI    ##
Dolejskova 3, CZ-182 23 Prague 8             ##         AB INITIO         ##
Czech Republic                               ###############################
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Phone: (0042 2) 66 05 3436                    FAX: (0042 2) 858 2307
                     E-Mail: hrusak@jh-inst.cas.cz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


From gbaudoux@quick.cc.fundp.ac.be  Thu Feb  2 05:41:49 1995
Received: from hermes.fundp.ac.be  for gbaudoux@quick.cc.fundp.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id FAA06816; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 05:35:35 -0500
From: <gbaudoux@quick.cc.fundp.ac.be>
Received: by hermes.fundp.ac.be; id AA26735; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 11:41:31 +0100
Received: from quick.cc.fundp.ac.be by hermes.fundp.ac.be; id AA26735; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 11:41:31 +0100
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 11:26:52 +0200
Message-Id: <95020211265229@quick.cc.fundp.ac.be>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: searching for Threader
X-Vms-To: SMTP%"chemistry@ccl.net"


Hello!

I am searching for the program Threader of D.Jones. 
It is a program for fold recognition from protein sequences.
Please send any information to my email address.
Thanks in advance,

Guy Baudoux
University of Namur
Rue de Bruxelles, 61
5000 Namur, Belgium
email: gbaudoux@quick.cc.fundp.ac.be

From mmccar@postman.essex.ac.uk  Thu Feb  2 06:41:45 1995
Received: from postman.essex.ac.uk  for mmccar@postman.essex.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id FAA07362; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 05:58:41 -0500
Received: from postman.essex.ac.uk by postman.essex.ac.uk with SMTP (PP) 
          id <27860-0@postman.essex.ac.uk>; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 10:58:02 +0000
From: Mccarron M <mmccar@essex.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 10:57:54 GMT
Message-Id: <12952.9502021057@solb1.essex.ac.uk>
To: chemistry <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: CHARMM


Could anybody out there tell me if it is possible to solvate
using CHARMM.  I know that CHARMM can recognise molecules already 
solvated but is it possible to solvate with this program like
you can with AMBER say.
Thanks for you help

mail mmccar@essex.ac.uk

From thuber@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE  Thu Feb  2 08:41:45 1995
Received: from srv.cip.physik.tu-muenchen.de  for thuber@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id IAA08381; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 08:08:46 -0500
Received:  from speedy.cip.physik.tu-muenchen.de
	by srv.cip.physik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id AA01360
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net> (5.67a/IDA-1.5/bs04);
	Thu, 2 Feb 1995 14:07:19 +0100
Received: by speedy.cip.physik.tu-muenchen.de (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA25541; Thu, 2 Feb 95 14:07:19 +0100
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 14:07:19 +0100
From: Thomas.Huber@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE
Message-Id: <9502021307.AA25541@speedy.cip.physik.tu-muenchen.de>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Summary: van der Waals parameters from ab initio calc


10 days ago I submitted the following question to CCL, the answers I got are
appeded: 

Subject: van der Waals parameters from ab initio calc?

Hi netters!

Could you please tell me how to derive van der Waals parameters from ab initio
calculations!
Any suggestions are wellcome (references, principles,...).
I'm interested in practical as well as theoretical approaches to this problem.
If I got interesting response, I'll collect them and post it to this group!

Thank you for help!

Thomas


Thomas Huber
Institut fuer Physikalische Biochemie 
der Universitaet Muenchen
Schillerstrasse 44
80336 Muenchen
Germany
email: thuber@physik.tu-muenchen.de

Return-Path: YQIN@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu

Dear Huber:

     Thank you for posting such interesting question.  Eventhough I can not
give you answer, but I would like to see the summary if you can get enough.
Thank you very much in advarce

                                                    With my best regards

                                                    yuli  qin

                                         yqin@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu
 
From: jxh@ibm12.biosym.com (Joerg Hill)
Hi,
sorry for wasting bandwidth, but a direct response did not work.

Van-der-Waals parameters for repulsion can be obtained from ab initio
calculations using a test particle ansatz. The most papers have been
published by Ahlrichs:

H.-J. Boehm, R. Ahlrichs: JCP 77 (1982) 2028
H.-J. Boehm, R. Ahlrichs, P. Scharf, H. Schiffer: JCP 81 (1984) 1389

are the both basic paper. Applications can be found in:

H.-J. Boehm, C. Meissner, R. Ahlrichs: Mol. Phys. 53 (1984) 651
K. P. Sagarik, R. Ahlrichs, S. Brode: Mol. Phys. 57 (1986) 1247
K. P. Sagarik, R. Ahlrichs: Chem. Phys. Letters 131 (1986) 74
K. P. Sagarik, R. Ahlrichs: JCP 86 (1987) 5117
J.-R. Hill, J. Sauer: JPC 98 (1994) 1238

A new paper, which considers anisotropy is:

A. J. Stone, C.-S. Tong: JCC 15 (1994) 1377

I don't know any papers concerning the derivation of dispersive parameters
from ab initio calculations. But dispersion requires electron correlation
and since these calculations are rather expensive, it could be that noone
has triesd it so far. Density Functional calculations could change this.

Tschuess
Joerg

P.S.: host name Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE NOT FOUND.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Joerg-Ruediger Hill   | Every attempt to employ mathematical methods in the
Biosym Technologies, Inc. | study of chemical questions must be considered pro-
9685 Scranton Road        | foundly irrational  and  contrary  to the spirit of
San Diego, CA 92121-2777  | chemistry ...  If mathematical analysis should ever
USA                       | hold a prominent place in chemistry - an aberration
                          | which  is  happily  almost  impossible  -  it would
Phone (619) 546-5508      | occasion  a rapid  and  widespread  degeneration of
Fax   (619) 458-0136      | that science.
E-mail jxh@biosym.com     |                                      A. Comte, 1830
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 The opinions expressed in this message are my personal opinions and no offical
 statements of Biosym Technologies, Inc. For informations about Biosym products
 send mail to: rcenter@biosym.com.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: helden@gaucho.ucsb.edu

Servus,
We are interested in the ineraction of helium with small to 
medium small (10 - 200 atoms) molecules. We found that with the MM3 vdW
parameters (Theochem, 312 (1994) 69), we can reproduce our experimental
results (gas phase mobilities) very well. I also tried to calculate
vdW parameters for He-He and H3C-H - He. In order to get the attractive
part of the potential right, one has to throw in a lot of correlation (CCSD(t))
and large basis sets (tripple zeta+pol.+diffuse). The repulsive part
of the potential on the other hand is well described by plain SCF + small basis
set. I did a scan of the pot. surface of H3C-H - He and found that fitting
a 12-6 potential to the scan gives very poor agreement while an exp.-6
potential is much better. The well depth and the position for these two
systems seems to be in reasonable good agreement with the MM3 parameters.

Contact me if you want to know more about what we are doing,

....Gert

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Gert von Helden, Dept. of Chemistry, UCSB, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 +
+ Tel   : 805-893-2673, Fax   : 805-893-8703                         +
+ E-mail: helden@gaucho.ucsb.edu                                     +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 


Return-Path: states@ibc.wustl.edu

|> Thomas Huber wrote:
|> Could you please tell me how to derive van der Waals parameters from 
|> ab initio calculations!
|> Any suggestions are wellcome (references, principles,...).

For condensed matter, there is a fundamental problem with the
derivation of non-bonded interactions from ab initio calculations on
isolated molecules.  High quality ab initio calculations include
wavefunctions with quite large spatial extents, much larger than
existence in a condensed matter environment would allow.  So, if you
are going to calculate non-bonded interactions, you need to start with
realistic calculations including multiple molecules.  The energy of
interaction is straightforward.  Deciding how much of it is "van der
Waals" is another issue.

David States

From: underhil@hp.rmc.ca (Ross Underhill)
Subject: Re: CCL:van der Waals parameters from ab initio calc?

>Could you please tell me how to derive van der Waals parameters from ab initio
>calculations!
>Any suggestions are wellcome (references, principles,...).
>I'm interested in practical as well as theoretical approaches to this problem.
>If I got interesting response, I'll collect them and post it to this group!

A very interesting question and one I have tried to deal with myself.  For
some elements you can put together two diatomics and bring them together
using ab initio calcs and plot the total energy.  You can then fit the
calculated energy as a function of separation.  I have done this in a few
cases.  I've even done it for methane.  You really should do it using UHF
since a lot of the attraction at long distances has to do with correlation
energy.  Obviously this scheme will not work for some elements that don't
make diatomics or small simple molecules.  There is also the point that this
only seems to make sense for closed shell systems.  It seems to me I saw
some references on deriving VDW parameters on the AMBER WWW site.  You might
want to look there.  I picked up some F parameters there.

 
Dr. Ross Underhill
Royal Military College of Canada
Kingston, Ontario
(613) 541-6000 X6175

Return-Path: mizan@engin.umich.edu

A possible reference for Nonbonding interactions from ab initio calculations
may be:

Dinur, U. and A.T. Hagler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111, 5149-5151, 1989.


Hope this helps.


Tahmid Mizan 
University of Michigan

Return-Path: d-white1@assistant.beckman.uiuc.edu

Thomas

Please either summarize this for the net or send me a copy of the replies.
I am really intereted in this myself.

Sincerely

David White


 
****************************************************************************
*                                    *                                     * 
* David White                        * Man is the best computer we can put *
* Postdoctoral Research Associate    * aboard a spacecraft -- and the only *
* Beckman Institute                  * one that can be mass produced with  *
* (217) 244-1733                     * unskilled labour                    *
* (217) 244-8371 (fax)               *            Werner von Braun         *
*                                    *                                     *	
****************************************************************************
 


From dodik@yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il  Thu Feb  2 10:41:46 1995
Received: from shum.cc.huji.ac.il  for dodik@yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA09942; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 09:42:11 -0500
Received: from yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il by shum.cc.huji.ac.il with SMTP id AA26862
  (5.67bHU/IDA-1.5 for <chemistry@ccl.net>); Thu, 2 Feb 1995 16:41:43 +0200
Received: by yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA38244; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 16:37:42 +0200
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 16:37:42 +0200
From: dodik@yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il (David Danovich)
Message-Id: <9502021437.AA38244@yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL: G2+ theory



 Dear Netters,

 I was asked to do G2+ theory calculations. I know about G2 theory but not about G2+.
Could anyone tell me what is G2+ theory and give me a reference?
 Thank you in advanve.   David

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 Dr. David Danovich                       | Internet: dodik@yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il
 Computational Chemist                    | Office phone: (+972)-2-586934
 Department of Organic Chemistry          | FAX:          (+972)-2-585345
 The Hebrew University, Givat-Ram Campus, | Home phone:   (+972)-2-789544
 91904 Jerusalem, Israel                  |
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

From hs@ccl.net  Thu Feb  2 10:54:08 1995
Received: from helix  for hs@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id KAA10651; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 10:06:15 -0500
Received: by helix (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA25628; Thu, 2 Feb 95 16:04:46 +0100
From: "Hellfried Schreiber" <hs@helix.mdy.univie.ac.at>
Message-Id: <9502021604.ZM25626@helix.mdy.univie.ac.at>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 16:04:44 +0100
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Conference Announcement
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0




  >> INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOLECULAR STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY <<

           Organized by the Austrian Chemical Society

             Vienna (Austria), September 17-20, 1995


TOPICS:

      1) The Impact of Molecular Biology on Structural Biology
      2) Biomolecular Structure Determination
                  a) X-Ray Diffraction
                  b) NMR Spectroscopy
      3) Dynamics and Function of Biomolecules
      4) Computational Methods
      5) Protein Engineering and Design

Speakers include:

      Tom Blundell(UK), Hans-J. Boehm(D), Charles Cantor(USA),
      Christopher Dobson(UK), Manfred Eigen(D), Alan Fersht(UK),
      Robert Huber(D), Oleg Jardetzky(USA), Martin Karplus(USA),
      Joseph Lakowicz(USA), Paul Roesch(D), Ilme Schlichting(D),
      Jeffrey Skolnick(USA), Malcom Walkinshaw(CH)


Posters are invited on any of the conference topics
Outstanding posters will be selected for 20 minute oral presentations
Abstract deadline: MAY 31, 1995

Head of Scientific Committee:    P.Schuster
Preliminary Participation Fees:  Regular Participant   4000 ATS
                                 GOeCH Member          3500 ATS
                                 Student               2000 ATS


For further information and preregistration, contact:

      A.Kungl
      Gesellschaft Oesterreichischer Chemiker
      AG Biophysikalische Chemie
      Nibelungengasse 11
      A-1010 Wien, Austria
      Tel.: (43) 1 587249
      FAX.: (43) 1 587966
      e-mail: msb95@helix.mdy.univie.ac.at


-- 


+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                             |
|                           Hellfried Schreiber, Ph.D.                        |
|                                                                             |
+---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
|                                       |                                     |
|  Institute for Theoretical Chemistry  |                                     |
|  Theoretical Biochemistry Group       |   Mail:  hs@helix.mdy.univie.ac.at  |
|  Waehrigerstrasse 17                  |   Voice: +43 1 40480 - 618          |
|  A-1090 Wien, Austria, Europe         |   FAX:   +43 1 4028525              |
|                                       |                                     |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+


From roger@proteus.co.uk  Thu Feb  2 12:41:48 1995
Received: from eros.britain.eu.net  for roger@proteus.co.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id MAA13959; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 12:04:35 -0500
Received: from proteus.co.uk by eros.britain.eu.net with UUCP 
          id <sg.15817-0@eros.britain.eu.net>; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 12:24:19 +0000
From: Roger Mee <roger@proteus.co.uk>
Message-Id: <9502021130.ZM27949@Inca.proteus.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 11:30:46 +0000
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: High resolution molecular graphics
Cc: r.a.sykes@proteus.co.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0



Hello,

I am enquiring to see whether anyone out there has written or is aware of an
interface between the Ribbons package of Mike Carson and Raster3D the high
resolution image rendering package distributed by Ethan Merritt. I am aware
that the Molscript package is closely linked to Raster3D, but I would be
interested to see if the alternative route is possible.

Alternatively if  anyone can suggest other solutions to the problem of creating
high resolution (up to 400dpi)  molecular graphics images on SGI platforms then
please let me know.

Please mail me direct and I will summarise to the list.

Thanks

Roger

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Mee                         |  tel +44 (0) 625-500 555   |
Proteus Molecular Design          |  fax +44 (0) 625-500 666   |
Lyme Green Business Park          |  roger@proteus.co.uk       |
Macclesfield, UK. SK11 0JL        |                            |
----------------------------------------------------------------


From hcj@mazda.wavefun.com  Thu Feb  2 12:54:29 1995
Received: from volvo.wavefun.com  for hcj@mazda.wavefun.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id MAA14336; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 12:23:22 -0500
Received: from mazda.wavefun.com by volvo.wavefun.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/930416.SGI)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA08118; Thu, 2 Feb 95 09:23:24 -0800
Received: by mazda.wavefun.com (931110.SGI/930416.SGI)
	for @volvo.wavefun.com:chemistry@ccl.net id AA22433; Thu, 2 Feb 95 09:23:22 -0800
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 09:23:22 -0800
From: hcj@mazda.wavefun.com (Harry C. Johnson)
Message-Id: <9502021723.AA22433@mazda.wavefun.com>
To: laaksone@csc.fi
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9502020859.A6028-0100000@finsun.csc.fi> (message from Leif Laaksonen on Thu, 2 Feb 1995 08:26:33 +0200 (EET))
Subject: Re: CCL:Chemistry on PC:s
Reply-To: hcj@wavefun.com


>>>>> "Leif" == Leif Laaksonen <laaksone@csc.fi> writes:

    Leif> My question is now, is there any demand (need) to write
    Leif> graphics programs for computation chemists for the PC
    Leif> (Windows NT) market? I am talking about client/server
    Leif> programs where the graphics would be sitting on the PC and
    Leif> the computationally intensive parts would be done on other
    Leif> machines.  This would give us the possibility to cut and
    Leif> past graphics and data direct to PC applications like word
    Leif> processors or spreadsheets. If everybody already has a Unix

One solution that is present already is when using modelling programs
that support X-windows, such as Spartan (obligatory plug 8^), the
graphics can actually be displayed on your PC or Mac while the program
runs on a workstation.  This is done by running an X-windows server on
the PC or Mac, of which there are several available, and telling the
client, the modelling program, to which display server it should
connect.  This will in most cases allow the cut and paste capabilities
as well.  Here at Wavefunction we have tested our graphics with MacX,
for the Mac or course, and PC-Xware for Windows 3.1.  They both work
quite well.

-Harry

+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|Harry C. Johnson       |  /--- ----\  /---/ ---\ ----- /---/ /|   / |
|Computational Chemist  |  \    /   / /   / /   /  /   /   / / |  /  |
|Wavefunction Inc.      |   \  /---/ /---/ /---/  /   /---/ /  | /   |
|E-mail: hcj@wavefun.com|---/ /     /   / /   \  /   /   / /   |/    |
+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------+



From oesterei@hrz.ba-freiberg.de  Thu Feb  2 14:42:05 1995
Received: from orion.hrz.ba-freiberg.de  for oesterei@hrz.ba-freiberg.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id OAA16787; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 14:24:58 -0500
Message-Id: <199502021924.OAA16787@www.ccl.net>
Received: by orion.hrz.ba-freiberg.de
	(1.38.193.5/15.6) id AA00747; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 20:24:03 +0100
From: Ralf Oestereich <oesterei@hrz.ba-freiberg.de>
Subject: How to handle "COLLAGE" saved HDF files?
To: chemistry@ccl.net (Computer Chemistry List)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 20:24:01 MEZ
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85.2.1]



Dear netters.

We have to following problem:

To make some hardcopies of SPARTAN images,
we just tried to grap the screen with 
COLLAGE. Now the question for us is, how can
we convert these HDF-format files, into
a printable postscript version?

Thats the problem so far!

Thank you very much for your attention and
your help!

Sincerly,
                R. Oestereich



Insitut f. Anorganische Chemie
Leipziger Strasse
09599 Freiberg
GERMANY


From michael@bch48.bch.ncsu.edu  Thu Feb  2 15:01:07 1995
Received: from bch48.bch.ncsu.edu  for michael@bch48.bch.ncsu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id OAA17013; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 14:29:16 -0500
Received: by bch48.bch.ncsu.edu (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA27849; Thu, 2 Feb 95 14:29:06 -0500
From: "Michael R Rothwell" <michael@bch48.bch.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <9502021428.ZM27847@bch48.bch.ncsu.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 14:28:56 -0500
In-Reply-To: Leif Laaksonen <laaksone@csc.fi>
        "CCL:Chemistry on PC:s" (Feb  2,  8:26am)
References: <Pine.3.89.9502020859.A6028-0100000@finsun.csc.fi>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: Leif Laaksonen <laaksone@csc.fi>, chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Chemistry on PC:s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0


You can even compile (supposedly) X11.R6 onto an NT machine. For regular old
windows, Hummingbird software makes a package called "eXceed/W" that is an
X11.R5 server (or is that client?) and lets you have your Unix machine send its
display to the PC. You can copy text back and forth. Combined with a program
like PC-NFS or just an ftp server for windows (like Novell's), a PC makes a
great front end for Unix workstations. Here at NCSU many people do not have
their own Unix machines, but need to use Unix power & software; we use eXeec to
xlogin to one of several compute servers on campus. A co-worker of mine does
his SAS work on a faraway SparcStation from the PC but edits the input & output
in Microsoft Word, all without leaving the PC.
I used to use a PC as the display for one very old SparcStation, because it was
actually -faster-, and I got a lot of colors and use of the PC's graphic
accelerator.

eXceed won't support OpenGL, but you can buy translator programs which convert
OpenGL graphics into standard X.

Is this the sort of thing you're talking about?


From fox@fenris.ucsf.EDU  Thu Feb  2 15:41:52 1995
Received: from cgl.ucsf.EDU  for fox@fenris.ucsf.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id PAA17996; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 15:13:08 -0500
Received: from fenris.ucsf.EDU (fenris.ucsf.EDU [128.218.14.26]) by cgl.ucsf.EDU (8.6.7/GSC4.24) with SMTP
	id MAA26679 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 12:13:05 -0800
Received: by fenris.ucsf.EDU (1.38.193.4/GSC4.21)
	id AA16001; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 12:13:03 -0800
From: fox@fenris.ucsf.EDU (Thomas Fox)
Message-Id: <9502022013.AA16001@fenris.ucsf.EDU>
Subject: G92-DFT bug? H and LYP
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 12:13:03 "PST
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]



Dear CCLers,

I was using the DFT module of Gaussian 92 (HP-PARisc-HPUX-G92/DFT-RevF.4)
and came across something that looks like a bug to me: when I try to
calculate an one-electron system (like the H atom) and use the Lee-Yang-Parr
functional, my G92 version stops with an IEEE division by zero error.
I browsed through the code, and sure enough found in the LYP subroutine
a division by Rho(Beta), which is, in the case of one electron, equal zero.
I dont have access to the original paper right now, so could someone just
reassure me that this behavior is definitely an unexpected one, and that
it doesnt mean that the LYP functional is not valid in the limit of one
electron or if I only have electrons of one spin species (Gaussian shouldnt 
abort that ungracefully, anyway...).

A related question is how to get in contact with these Gaussian guys...I
sent a message to help@gaussian.com some weeks ago, but havent heard from 
them back.

And, could anybody who has access to a DFT implementation (maybe there is
even a G92 version out there that doesnt show this behavior) that 
supports Becke 3 parameter XC in connection with the LYP C functional
calculate the energy for a H radical (with a 6-31G* basis) for me? Pointers
to papers where this has been done (maybe as a test case for the functional)
are, of course, also highly welcome.

Thanks a lot,

Thomas
--

Thomas Fox                               e-mail: fox@cgl.ucsf.edu
Dept. of Pharmaceutical Chemistry
University of California
San Francisco, CA 94143-0446
				 ,,,  
                                (o o)
-----------------------------ooo-(^)-ooo-------------------------------------
                                  U  
The years of peak mental activity are undoubtedly between the ages of
four and eighteen. At four we know all the questions, at eighteen all
the answers.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

           $$$  Disclaimer: opinions blah blah blah mine...  $$$
				 ***

From hcj@mazda.wavefun.com  Thu Feb  2 17:41:54 1995
Received: from volvo.wavefun.com  for hcj@mazda.wavefun.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id RAA21086; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 17:05:34 -0500
Received: from mazda.wavefun.com by volvo.wavefun.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/930416.SGI)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA00393; Thu, 2 Feb 95 14:05:37 -0800
Received: by mazda.wavefun.com (931110.SGI/930416.SGI)
	for @volvo.wavefun.com:chemistry@ccl.net id AA27692; Thu, 2 Feb 95 14:05:30 -0800
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 14:05:30 -0800
From: hcj@mazda.wavefun.com (Harry C. Johnson)
Message-Id: <9502022205.AA27692@mazda.wavefun.com>
To: oesterei@hrz.ba-freiberg.de
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <199502021924.OAA16787@www.ccl.net> (message from Ralf Oestereich on Thu, 2 Feb 95 20:24:01 MEZ)
Subject: Re: CCL:How to handle "COLLAGE" saved HDF files?
Reply-To: hcj@wavefun.com


>>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Oestereich <oesterei@hrz.ba-freiberg.de> writes:

    Ralf> To make some hardcopies of SPARTAN images, we just tried to
    Ralf> grap the screen with COLLAGE. Now the question for us is,
    Ralf> how can we convert these HDF-format files, into a printable
    Ralf> postscript version?

If you do a screen capture in Collage the picture is put into a
whiteboard.  From there you can save the image as postscript by
choosing print image from the file menu, and then selecting save
instead of print in the print dialog.  This will open up another
dialog to let you enter the filename.

Hope this helps!
-Harry

+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|Harry C. Johnson       |  /--- ----\  /---/ ---\ ----- /---/ /|   / |
|Computational Chemist  |  \    /   / /   / /   /  /   /   / / |  /  |
|Wavefunction Inc.      |   \  /---/ /---/ /---/  /   /---/ /  | /   |
|E-mail: hcj@wavefun.com|---/ /     /   / /   \  /   /   / /   |/    |
+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------+



From Don_Gregory@msi.com  Thu Feb  2 17:43:47 1995
Received: from msi.com  for Don_Gregory@msi.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id RAA21475; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 17:23:18 -0500
Received: from qmail-gw.msi.com by msi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA14488; Thu, 2 Feb 95 17:25:20 EST
Message-Id: <9502022225.AA14488@msi.com>
Date: 2 Feb 1995 17:22:15 +0000
From: "Don Gregory" <Don_Gregory@msi.com>
Subject: Re- CHARMM(m) Solvation
To: "Comp. Chem. Listserver" <chemistry@ccl.net>


                       Subject:                               Time:9:20 AM
  OFFICE MEMO          Re: CHARMM(m) Solvation                Date:2/2/95
On 2 Feb., McCarron from the UK wrote:

"Could anybody out there tell me if it is possible to solvate
using CHARMM.  I know that CHARMM can recognise molecules already 
solvated but is it possible to solvate with this program like
you can with AMBER say.
Thanks for you help"
-----------------------------------
Yes, indeed ....... CHARMM, the program is quite well
suited for calculations on virtually all molecular systems.
Although its original design was to take advantage of biomolecular
systems, CHARMM has been used for materials, polymers, drug-design
and many many other non-protein/nucleic-acid type systems.
The CHARMM-Harvard and CHARMm-MSI force fields also, have
been parameterized to be compatible with several well-validated
water models, most notably the TIP3 model of Prof. Jorgensen.
Solvation of molecules, most easily accomplished through the
Quanta interface, can take the form of:
periodic boundary systems,
stochastic boundary systems
and pressure-gradient calculations.
In all these cases, it is trivial to solvate small molecular
systems with a 15A or a 30A box of TIP3 waters (provided),
or to solvate a subset of a much larger system with a
sphere of water.
We have recently been working up hexagonal cylinders
of water to use with coiled peptide, and nucleic acid
systems.
Don Gregory
Mgr. Life Science Applications, MSI




From lohrenz@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca  Thu Feb  2 21:41:54 1995
Received: from zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca  for lohrenz@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id VAA24510; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 21:22:34 -0500
From: <lohrenz@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca>
Received: by zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA26809; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 19:17:47 -0700
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 19:17:47 -0700
Message-Id: <9502030217.AA26809@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Dipole derivatives in G92



Dear CCL-friends,

I'm sending the following question in behave of Vanitha, may be
someone out there in the net can help us...

My research entails vibrational circular dichroism (VCD)
spectroscopy of biological molecules.  I plan to use Gaussian92
for frequency analysis of the nucleotide bases.  However, I have
a problem finding the first derivative of the dipole moment with
respect to a normal mode, i.e. I require the transition moment as
input for a semi-empirical method of calculating VCD spectra.
Dipole moment derivatives with respect to Cartesian coordinates
are readily available on the Gaussian92 output but for my
application I require the dipole moment derivative w.r.t normal
modes.  I will appreciate help or suggestions in this regard.

Thank You

Vanitha 

John Lohrenz
Dept. of Chemistry
University of Calgary
2500 University Drive, N.W.
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4
Canada

email: lohrenz@zinc.chem.ucalgary.ca

From Renate_Griffith@uow.edu.au  Thu Feb  2 22:42:00 1995
Received: from wyrm.cc.uow.edu.au  for Renate_Griffith@uow.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id WAA25173; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 22:03:38 -0500
Received: from uow.edu.au (ms-gw.uow.edu.au [130.130.68.33]) by wyrm.cc.uow.edu.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA07604 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 14:03:17 +1100
Message-ID: <n1420302342.56953@uow.edu.au>
Date: 3 Feb 1995 14:02:46 +1100
From: "Renate Griffith" <Renate_Griffith@uow.edu.au>
Return-Receipt-To: "Renate Griffith" <Renate_Griffith@uow.edu.au>
Subject: medium sized heterocycles
To: "COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY LIST" <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-MS 3.0.1


Dear netters, 
I am interested in the conformations of medium sized heterocycles at or
around the global minimum and how to explore them. I am talking about 8-11
membered rings, containing one or two N and/or O atoms. I am also interested
in controlling ring geometry via transannular interactions (e.g. H-bonding or
N-carbonyl).
Can anybody help me with references?
Thank you 
Renate

Renate Griffith
Dept. of Chemistry
University of Wollongong
Australia
email:
r.griffith@uow.edu.au

