From lutz@ricx.royal-institution.ac.uk  Tue Apr 25 07:48:09 1995
Received: from sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk  for lutz@ricx.royal-institution.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id HAA25569; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 07:47:38 -0400
Via: uk.ac.royal-institution.ricx; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 11:41:25 +0100
From: Lutz Ackermann <lutz@ricx.royal-institution.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 95 11:36:43 +0100
Message-Id: <16033.9504251036@ricx.ri.ac.uk>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CADPAC MO-visualization?


Hello Netters,
I am using the CADPAC program and I want to accelerate the analysis of
electronic structure a bit. Does anyone know, if there are (quick and
dirty, eazy to use) programs around, that will allow me to generate
   a) IRREP assignment for each MO
   b) conture plots  for each MO
>from an *.out file?

Thank's a lot!

L. Ackermann


               <^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>
	       <    Dr. Lutz Ackermann                        >
               <    Davy-Faraday Research Laboratory          >
	       <    The Royal Institution of Great Britain    >
	       <    21 Albemarle Street                       >
	       <    London W1X 4BS                            >
	       <    UK                                        >
               <                                              >
	       <    phone: +44-171-409 2992 ext 424           >
	       <    FAX:   +44-171-629 3569                   >
               <    e-mail:  lutz@ricx.ri.ac.uk               >
	        vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

From theochem@ctc.com  Tue Apr 25 09:03:15 1995
Received: from server1.ctc.com  for theochem@ctc.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id IAA26546; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 08:55:40 -0400
Received: by server1.ctc.com (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
	id AA04343; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 08:55:40 -0400
Received: by pauling.ctc.com (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for @server1.ctc.com:chemistry@ccl.net id AA28603; Tue, 25 Apr 95 09:52:07 -0400
From: theochem@ctc.com (Douglas Smith)
Message-Id: <9504251352.AA28603@pauling.ctc.com>
Subject: looking for Network Toolbox
To: chemistry@ccl.net (Computational Chemistry List)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:52:05 -0500 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 627       


A while back someoneposted about software called Chemical Reaction Network
Toolbox.  I cannot locate the message nor does my search through the
archives seem to locate it.  Can someone resend it to me?  Thanks in advance.

Doug
-- 

Douglas A. Smith
Principal Technical Staff/Theoretical Chemist
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
1450 Scalp Avenue
Johnstown, PA 15904

voice:  (814) 269-2545
fax:    (814) 269-2798
email:  theochem@ctc.com

Stadnard Disclamur: All opinions, comments, mistakes, endorsements and odd
noises are my own, not my employer's.

I would rather be and optimist and wrong than a pessimist and right. 


From kcross@cas.org  Tue Apr 25 09:48:22 1995
Received: from srv01s4.cas.org  for kcross@cas.org
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id JAA27215; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:35:54 -0400
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 95 09:35:14 EDT
From: kcross@cas.org (Kevin P. Cross Ext. 3192)
Message-Id: <9504250935.AA23516@cas.org>
Subject: Re: CCL:The Winner (thus far)
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 24 Apr 1995 19:56:01 -0400 (EDT)
To: "J. Eric Slone" <eslone@osf1.gmu.edu>
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net


Eric,

You may want to take a look at the following nickel alloy
with 19 different elements.  This super-alloy is used for
making rotor units with integrally cast blades in gas-turbine engines.

CAS Registry has 11 alloys with 19 different elements in them :)

RN   12616-59-0
Name   AF2-1DA

Component        Component
		  Percent
=========+=====================
    Ni         56    -  63
    Cr         11.5  -  12.5
    Co          9.50 -  10.50
    W           5.50 -   6.50
    Al          4.20 -   4.80
    Mo          2.50 -   3.50
    Ti          2.75 -   3.25
    Ta          1.00 -   2.00
    Fe          0    -   1.00
    C           0.30 -   0.35
    Zr          0.05 -   0.15
    Mn          0    -   0.10
    Si          0    -   0.10
    B           0.01 -   0.02
    P           0    -   0.015
    S           0    -   0.015
    O           0    -   0.010
    N           0    -   0.005
    Pb          0    -   0.002

	      22 REFERENCES IN FILE CA (1967 TO DATE)

================================================
Kevin P. Cross, Ph.D.
Senior Associate Research Scientist
Research
Chemical Abstracts Service
2540 Olentangy River Road
P.O. Box 3012
Columbus, OH 43210

kcross@cas.org
(800)-848-6538 Ext. 3192
FAX:(614)-447-3750
================================================


From belletem@ERE.UMontreal.CA  Tue Apr 25 12:15:35 1995
Received: from effraie.CC.UMontreal.CA  for belletem@ERE.UMontreal.CA
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id MAA03559; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 12:13:19 -0400
Received: from eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA by effraie.CC.UMontreal.CA with SMTP id AA04982
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for chemistry@ccl.net); Tue, 25 Apr 1995 12:12:49 -0400
Received: from tornade.ERE.UMontreal.CA by eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (940406.SGI/5.17)
	id AA05133; Tue, 25 Apr 95 12:12:48 -0400
Received: by tornade.ERE.UMontreal.CA (940406.SGI/5.17)
	id AA04884; Tue, 25 Apr 95 12:12:47 -0400
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 12:12:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Belletete Michel <belletem@ERE.UMontreal.CA>
Subject: Amber calculations
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9504251202.A3748-0100000@tornade.ERE.UMontreal.CA>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Hi Netters,

    I am facing some problems using Hyperchem, version 3 and 4, Hypercube 
Inc. for doing Amber calculations on a glucose molecule. Each time I 
attempt the calculation,  warning message appears ststing that 

 No bending parameters found for atom types OS-CT-OS.

 Essentially, the bending parametrs are missing for the O-C-O linkage. 
Could anybody throw some light on this problem? On a similar vein, I have 
problems with an indole molecule in which the bending parameters missing 
are of the type CA-CN-NB.Could anybody help me?

 Thanks in advance,

 Michel


   



From 94970459@vax1.dcu.ie  Tue Apr 25 12:30:33 1995
Received: from VAX1.DCU.IE  for 94970459@vax1.dcu.ie
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id MAA03927; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 12:28:47 -0400
Received: from vax1.dcu.ie by vax1.dcu.ie (PMDF V4.2-12 #4433) id
 <01HPRI958VSG935AI5@vax1.dcu.ie>; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:25:56 GMT
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:25:55 +0000 (GMT)
From: KANEPCHEM <94970459@vax1.dcu.ie>
Subject: AM1 vs. PM3
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HPRI95BK8I935AI5@vax1.dcu.ie>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: IN"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


 Dear CCL'ers,

 Some weeks ago someone posted a message giving the location of a comparison of
the AM1 and PM3 semi-empirical methods. Due to over-enthisiastic spring
cleaning on my part I have lost the address where this article can be found.
I would be very much obliged if someone could post the address again.

 Thanks in advance,

 Paddy Kane
 Dublin City University
 Ireland

From 94970459@vax1.dcu.ie  Tue Apr 25 13:15:32 1995
Received: from VAX1.DCU.IE  for 94970459@vax1.dcu.ie
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id NAA04895; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 13:06:03 -0400
Received: from vax1.dcu.ie by vax1.dcu.ie (PMDF V4.2-12 #4433) id
 <01HPRJK6JTEE9358W5@vax1.dcu.ie>; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 18:04:53 GMT
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 18:04:52 +0000 (GMT)
From: KANEPCHEM <94970459@vax1.dcu.ie>
Subject: Gibb's Free Energy of Formation
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HPRJK6K31K9358W5@vax1.dcu.ie>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


 Hi CCL'ers

 I am a HyperChem user. As you may know, HyperChem allow the user to calculate
enthalpies of formation. Can anyone tell me if it possible to calculate
entropies of formation and therefore Gibb's Free Energy of Formation.
I'll summarise replies and post them to everyone. Thanks in advance.

 Regards,

 Paddy Kane
 Dublin City University
 Ireland

From eslone@osf1.gmu.edu  Tue Apr 25 13:45:34 1995
Received: from osf1.gmu.edu  for eslone@osf1.gmu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id NAA06170; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 13:42:56 -0400
Received: by osf1.gmu.edu; (5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/07Sep94-1001AM/GMUv1)
	id AA02991; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 13:42:56 -0400
Message-Id: <9504251742.AA02991@osf1.gmu.edu>
Subject: The Winner (thus far) Update
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 13:42:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: "J. Eric Slone" <eslone@osf1.gmu.edu>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha5]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1533      



On further thought, and many messages suggesting I do so, I have decided
to remove the compound previously touted as "the winner (thus far)" from
the running.  This leaves the following in the field:

	C21 H13 B Cl Co D4 F N6 O3 P Pd . B F4

and

	C60 H78 Br2 Cd Cl2 I2 N16 O2 P2 W2

The first with 11 elements, the second with 10.  To cater to the
"impressiveness metric", I will include the submission:

	C6 H5 Cl F N O2 S

With 7 elements in a 17 atom molecule.  I would appreciate knowing the
score on the impressiveness scale for this "little" molecule.

The search still continues.  Submissions are always welcome, and reasons
for removal of any of these three contenders will be duly considered.

To those who have asked WHY??  Simply, I was curious.  I thought this
type of question would make for an interesting discussion on the list
and indeed, it has.  This is just for fun.

Eric



________________________________________________________________________________

 J. Eric Slone                         George Mason University
                                       Department of Chemistry
                                       Fairfax, Virginia  22030-4444
 Internet:   eslone@gmu.edu
 Compuserve: 73757,2776                "True science teaches, above all, to
 Fax:        (703) 751-6639             doubt, and to be ignorant."
 Pager:      (202) 597-2373                               Miguel de Unamuno
 Voice:      (703) 461-7078
________________________________________________________________________________



From dyang@acs.ucalgary.ca  Tue Apr 25 16:00:33 1995
Received: from ds1.acs.ucalgary.ca  for dyang@acs.ucalgary.ca
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id PAA08942; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 15:50:09 -0400
Received: by acs2.acs.ucalgary.ca (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA130225; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 13:30:17 -0600
Message-Id: <9504251930.AA130225@acs2.acs.ucalgary.ca>
Subject: success stories of CC?
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 95 13:30:16 MDT
From: "Danya Yang" <dyang@acs.ucalgary.ca>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11B]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 258       


Dear Netters,

I am looking for success stories to show the usefulness of computer
modeling in the areas of corrosion, catalysis and surface chemistry.

I appreciate any help from you. I'll summarize the replies 
if there is enough interest.

Danya Yang





From lauderda@aces.usafa.af.mil  Tue Apr 25 16:06:37 1995
Received: from gems.usafa.af.mil  for lauderda@aces.usafa.af.mil
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id PAA09034; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 15:56:10 -0400
Received: from aces (aces.usafa.af.mil) by gems.usafa.af.mil with SMTP id AA23466
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <chemistry@ccl.net>); Tue, 25 Apr 1995 13:56:02 -0600
Received: by aces (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA10620; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 13:56:59 +0700
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 13:56:59 +0700
From: lauderda@aces.usafa.af.mil (Walter J. Lauderdale)
Message-Id: <9504251956.AA10620@aces>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Modelling molecule-surface interactions
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Content-Length: 688


Hello all.  This summer I'll be moving into a new research area concerned
with tribology and catalysis.  As I've not had very much experience modelling
things in these areas, I was wonderin' if some of the kind readers of this
list could point me to pertinent references and techniques.

I'll post a summary to the list (provided I get any replies ;^).  Thanks.

	Walt

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Walter J. Lauderdale                    Phone: (719)472-2655
Frank J. Seiler Research Laboratory
email: lauderda@aces.usafa.af.mil         FAX: (719)472-3649
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

From nbrought@rainbow.uchicago.edu  Tue Apr 25 16:45:33 1995
Received: from midway.uchicago.edu  for nbrought@rainbow.uchicago.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id QAA10098; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 16:40:46 -0400
Received: from rainbow.uchicago.edu (rainbow.uchicago.edu [128.135.136.33]) by midway.uchicago.edu (8.6.10/8.6.4) with SMTP id PAA19924 for <@midway.uchicago.edu:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 15:40:45 -0500
Received: by rainbow.uchicago.edu (931110.SGI/930416.SGI)
	for @midway.uchicago.edu:CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA29152; Tue, 25 Apr 95 15:40:07 -0500
From: nbrought@rainbow.uchicago.edu (Nancy Broughton)
Message-Id: <9504252040.AA29152@rainbow.uchicago.edu>
Subject: O + IBr PES?
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 15:40:06 -0500 (CDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 251       


Hello!

Does anybody out there know of any potential energy surfaces which have
been computed for the O + IBr reaction?

Thanks in advance for any responses!

Nancy Broughton
James Franck Institute, University of Chicago
nbrought@rainbow.uchicago.edu


From usdcc2p5@ibmmail.com  Tue Apr 25 17:00:33 1995
Received: from ibmmail.COM  for usdcc2p5@ibmmail.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id RAA10274; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:00:01 -0400
From: <usdcc2p5@ibmmail.com>
Message-Id: <199504252100.RAA10274@www.ccl.net>
Received: from IBMMAIL.COM by ibmmail.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with BSMTP id 9513;
   Tue, 25 Apr 95 16:59:49 EDT
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 16:59:47 EDT
To: chemistry@ccl.net, internet@ibmmail.com
X-Sender-Info: J.P. Cannady -     VOICE (517)496-6471 FAX (517)496-6243
               Dow Corning Corp, Mail #128 Midland, MI       48686-0995
               IBMMAIL(USDCC2P5)         INTERNET: usdcc2p5@ibmmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: CCL: PES for Si2O2 + SiO                                         


Is anyone out there aware of potential energy surface having been reported for
Si2O2 + SiO ?

Thanks in advance for any responses.

Pat Cannady
Dow Corning Corporation
usdcc2p5@ibmmail.com

Regards,
Pat      "Nowadays computers have replaced Hartree's father."
    - Ira N. Levine, Quantum Chemistry, Vol. 1, p.287 (1970)

From pfriedma@acnet.pratt.edu  Tue Apr 25 17:15:35 1995
Received: from pratt.edu  for pfriedma@acnet.pratt.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id RAA10395; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:09:37 -0400
Received: by pratt.edu (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA00875; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:08:57 -0400
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:08:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Friedman <pfriedma@acnet.pratt.edu>
To: Chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:Nine bits v. Eight
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950425164943.562B-100000@acnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


We are purchasing a pentium 100MHZ PC to speed up our runs using Hyperchem
and Gaussian 92W/DFT. I was alerted by several people that many of the newer
PCs use 8 bit SIMMs now. I've gotten differing opinions on whether parity
checking is needed. I would appreciate hearing from anyone with an informed
opinion as to the risks (no pun) involved. Hypercube and Gaussian boffins
especially welcome.
                                                    Thanks,
                                                    Paul Friedman
E-mail pfriedma@acnet.pratt.edu

From eslone@osf1.gmu.edu  Tue Apr 25 18:00:34 1995
Received: from osf1.gmu.edu  for eslone@osf1.gmu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id RAA12047; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:50:51 -0400
Received: by osf1.gmu.edu; (5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/07Sep94-1001AM/GMUv1)
	id AA04173; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:50:50 -0400
Message-Id: <9504252150.AA04173@osf1.gmu.edu>
Subject: New Element Discovered
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 17:50:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: "J. Eric Slone" <eslone@osf1.gmu.edu>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha5]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1322      




Scientists at the Rube Goldberg Research Institute have just discovered
an element made up of 312 neutrons per atom. The term atom is used
loosely in this case, because the new element has no protons or
electrons. This renders it completely impervious and inert. The proposed
name for element 312 is Administratium.

It appears to be held together by the forces of bureaucracy, which are
amazingly strong. This element does not decay, but reorganizes itself
spontaneously. Outermost neutrons are attracted to the center, and the
center becomes a black hole. This results in reorganization product
called Unobtainium, which is reputed to reside in storage areas and
warehouses.





________________________________________________________________________________

 J. Eric Slone                         George Mason University
                                       Department of Chemistry
                                       Fairfax, Virginia  22030-4444
 Internet:   eslone@gmu.edu
 Compuserve: 73757,2776                "True science teaches, above all, to
 Fax:        (703) 751-6639             doubt, and to be ignorant."
 Pager:      (202) 597-2373                               Miguel de Unamuno
 Voice:      (703) 461-7078
________________________________________________________________________________



From theochem@ctc.com  Tue Apr 25 23:00:38 1995
Received: from server1.ctc.com  for theochem@ctc.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id WAA16574; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 22:51:59 -0400
Received: by server1.ctc.com (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
	id AA22901; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 22:51:42 -0400
Received: by pauling.ctc.com (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for @server1.ctc.com:chemistry@ccl.net id AA02841; Tue, 25 Apr 95 23:47:51 -0400
From: theochem@ctc.com (Douglas Smith)
Message-Id: <9504260347.AA02841@pauling.ctc.com>
Subject: CSOMO references summary
To: chemistry@ccl.net (Computational Chemistry List)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 23:47:50 -0500 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2070      


Here is the summary of replies to my request for COSMO references.  Thanks 
to all who replied.

Doug
====

The original ref is JCS Perkin 2 1993 p. 799. Klamt has something new on
COSMO-RS in the last four or five issues of JPC

C. Cramer
==========

the mopac93 manual has this:
a klamt & g shuurmann. perkin transactions, p799, 1993 and p 196 of the
manual has a brief discussion.

S. Trohalaki

Similar replies were received from:

John M. Simmie
Emiel Rorije
Craig W. Burkhart
Joerg Heuer
=================

The COSMO solvation method is descibed in
A.Klamt and G. Schuurmann " COSMO: A new approach to dielectric Screening in
Solvents with Explicit Expressions for the screening energy and its gradient"
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, (1993) 799-805.

David Danovich
==============

J. Tomasi et al, Chem. Rev. 94, 2027-2094(1994) is a review article which discusses, among
other methods, COSMO.

Joe Leonard
===========

There is also a recent paper you might want to look at, too:
A. Klamt, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 2224 (1995).
 
I've been playing around with COSMO in Mopac myself, to see if I can
come up with a good (ie. consistent) set of "effective" radii for
solvents (other than water) that I'm interested in.  Hence my interest
in the second paper.

Ernest Chamot
=============

I also came into contact with Han Zuilhof, who used it in his Ph.D-thesis...
and an article. His E-mail address is ZUILHOF@chem.chem.rochester.edu.

Gerd Thys
=========

Another papers using his method are:
H. S. Rzepa and G. A. Suner, JCS, Chem.Comm. 1993, 1743.
H. S. Rzepa and G. A. Suner, JCS, Perkin Trans 2, 1994, 1397.

Guillermo A. Suner
==================

Thanks again.
-- 

Douglas A. Smith
Principal Technical Staff/Theoretical Chemist
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
1450 Scalp Avenue
Johnstown, PA 15904

voice:  (814) 269-2545
fax:    (814) 269-2798
email:  theochem@ctc.com

Stadnard Disclamur: All opinions, comments, mistakes, endorsements and odd
noises are my own, not my employer's.

I would rather be and optimist and wrong than a pessimist and right. 


