From SERGEI@ps1515.chemie.uni-marburg.de  Wed May 10 06:20:06 1995
Received: from Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE  for SERGEI@ps1515.chemie.uni-marburg.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id GAA09393; Wed, 10 May 1995 06:17:10 -0400
Received: from ps1515.Chemie.Uni-Marburg.DE by Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/20.07.94)
          id AA106908; Wed, 10 May 1995 12:16:34 +0200
Received: from NWS_CHEMIE/MAILQ by ps1515.chemie.uni-marburg.de (Mercury 1.20);
    10 May 95 12:17:03 GMT+2
Received: from MAILQ by NWS_CHEMIE (Mercury 1.20); 10 May 95 12:16:34 GMT+2
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: "Sergei Vyboishchikov"  <SERGEI@ps1515.chemie.uni-marburg.de>
Date:         10 May 95 12:16:31 MDT
Subject:      Gear method
Priority: normal
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R5).
Message-Id: <21355CD5AEC@ps1515.chemie.uni-marburg.de>


Dear Netters:

A friend of mine looks for a Fortran source code for solving a
system of stiff first-order differential equations implementing the
Gear method. Any hints and advices would be appreciated.

Thank you in advance
                         Sergei Vyboishchikov
                         Universitaet Marburg
                         E-mail: SERGEI@ps1515.chemie.uni-marburg.de

From young@slater.cem.msu.edu  Wed May 10 08:35:12 1995
Received: from slater.cem.msu.edu  for young@slater.cem.msu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id IAA10658; Wed, 10 May 1995 08:30:58 -0400
Received: by slater.cem.msu.edu (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA28989; Wed, 10 May 95 08:32:16 -0400
Date: Wed, 10 May 95 08:32:16 -0400
From: young@slater.cem.msu.edu (Dave Young)
Message-Id: <9505101232.AA28989@slater.cem.msu.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CBS and properties



Hello,

	I have been reading the complete basis set papers which were 
referenced on this list last week.  It looks like an interesting technique 
so I'll have to try it.

  	What I am wondering about is the possibility of getting properties
such as dipole moments and electrostatic potentials more accurately in
a similar manner.  

	My initial response is to say that a simplistic method which 
defines energy as a linear combination of energies from multiple
calculations could easily predict a dipole with the same linear 
combinations of dipoles.  However, a method with many complex integrals 
in the extrapolation proceedure might present technical difficulties for 
the extrapolation of properties.

	I would like to hear comments on the feasibility of extrapolating
property values.  If there are any references to methods for doing this,
please send them to me.


				Dave Young
				young@slater.cem.msu.edu

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
	In conventional ab initio calculations, an initial calculation
is done using the central field approximation.  Then a second calculation
is done to eliminate the errors introduced by that approximation.  Often
more time is spent correcting for errors in the original calculation
than on the original calculation.
	Why not just avoid making those errors in the first place?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



From oesterei@hrz.tu-freiberg.de  Wed May 10 09:20:13 1995
Received: from orion.hrz.tu-freiberg.de  for oesterei@hrz.tu-freiberg.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id JAA11373; Wed, 10 May 1995 09:08:23 -0400
Message-Id: <199505101308.JAA11373@www.ccl.net>
Received: by orion.hrz.tu-freiberg.de
	(1.38.193.5/15.6) id AA25555; Wed, 10 May 1995 15:05:57 +0200
From: Ralf Oestereich <oesterei@hrz.tu-freiberg.de>
Subject: NMR calculations with IGLO
To: chemistry@ccl.net (Computer Chemistry List)
Date: Wed, 10 May 95 15:05:56 MESZ
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85.2.1]


Dear netters!

We are looking forward to get in contact with
some CCL users who can help us with IGLO, i.e.
with the calculation and interpretation of
NMR data.

Please respond to my Email address at

	oesterei@orion.tu-freiberg.de


Thank you for your attention!

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
R. Oestereich	          			oesterei@orion.tu-freiberg.de

Insitut fuer Anorganische Chemie
Berakademie Freiberg
Leipziger Strasse
09596 Freiberg/Sachsen	
Germany

From ars@ari.net  Wed May 10 09:50:12 1995
Received: from mtolympus.ari.net  for ars@ari.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id JAA13167; Wed, 10 May 1995 09:48:48 -0400
Received: from arsoftware.ari.net (arsoftware.ari.net [198.69.192.82]) by mtolympus.ari.net (8.6.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id JAA16883 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 10 May 1995 09:48:25 -0400
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 09:48:25 -0400
Message-Id: <199505101348.JAA16883@mtolympus.ari.net>
X-Sender: ars@mtolympus.ari.net (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
From: ars@ari.net (ARSoftware Corporation)
Subject: Re:Gear Method


Though not fortran, Kinetics for Windows is an easy to use Microsoft Windows
based software package for modeling complex chemical reactions and reaction
mechanisms. This unique program computes the concentrations of the chemical
species in a system as a function of time for multistep reversible
reactions, given the reaction mechanism, the forward and reverse rate
constants, and the initial concentrations of reactants and products.
	
	KINETICS easy to use Windows interface allows you to input complex chemical
systems by simply typing in the reaction equations and the associated rate
constants.  The program automatically formulates the differential equations
necessary to describe the kinetics of the chemical system.  The rate
equations are then numerically integrated using a modified GEAR algorithm.  

Features:
* 	Systems containing up to 100 reversible reactions can be evaluated.
*	Each reaction can contain up to 5 reactants and 5 products.  Thus,
`            mechanisms with individual reactions as high as fifth order can
be                    examined.
*	Computations on systems containing up to 50 chemical species are
possible.
*	A plotting routine is included for viewing results.

For more information, contact ars@ari.net

Sincerely,

Sat Want S. Khalsa
ARSoftware

=====================================================
ARSoftware Corporation
8201 Corporate Drive
Landover, MD  20785
Phone:  (301) 459-3773
FAX:    (301) 459-3776

e-mail: ars@ari.net


From gregory@wucmd.wustl.edu  Wed May 10 09:53:22 1995
Received: from wugate.wustl.edu  for gregory@wucmd.wustl.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id JAA13178; Wed, 10 May 1995 09:49:29 -0400
Received: from wucmd (wucmd.wustl.edu [128.252.137.1]) by wugate.wustl.edu (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id IAA09518; Wed, 10 May 1995 08:49:26 -0500
Received: by wucmd (931110.SGI/911001.SGI)
	for @wugate.wustl.edu:chemistry@ccl.net id AA03703; Wed, 10 May 95 08:30:39 -0500
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 08:21:40 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gregory Nikiforovich <gregory@wucmd.wustl.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:RMS Fits and Symmetries
To: James A Given <given@tiber.nist.gov>
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net, gilson@indigo14.ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <199505051850.OAA18174@tiber.nist.gov>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.07.9505100837.C3607-b100000@wucmd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Fri, 5 May 1995, James A Given wrote:

>   I have what I hope is a common problem. We are generating ligand
> conformations for use in drug design. The ligands we use can
> contain groups with various symmetries, e.g., benzene rings.  
> Does anyone know how to take such symmetries into account when 
> calculating RMS fit? 
> 
>   As a simple example of the problem that arises, imagine a 
> molecule with a plane of symmetry through its center. If the 
> molecule is flipped over and then superposed with the original, 
> the RMS calculation of the difference between the two should be zero. But a naive
> calculation of the RMS will not give zero, because the
> pairing of atoms induced by the superposition is not the
> identity pairing, i.e., the atom marked '1' in the original
> will not be coincident with the atom marked '1' in the copy. 

	The real trick is that in drug design you will have an "important"
	and "unimportant" atoms (or functional groups). So the only RMS what
	matters would be related to the "important" groups (i.e.: aromatics,
        H-bond donors/acceptors, ionized groups, etc.). In reality, you
	wouldn't encounter situations with the clear symmetry for the
	"important" groups. (Though, there are exceptions, like the symmetric
	HIV protease inhibitors.) On the other hand, if you are worried about
        non-coincidence of your atom "1" to a copy atom "1", what is the
        difference, if both atoms are the same, as in benzene case ?

##############################################################################

Gregory V. Nikiforovich                                   Phone (314) 935-4677
Research Professor                                        Fax   (314) 935-4979
Center for Molecular Design                            E-mail address:
Washington University                                  gregory@wucmd.wustl.edu
Lopata Hall, Box 1099
St.Louis, MO 63130

##############################################################################



From gregory@wucmd.wustl.edu  Wed May 10 10:05:16 1995
Received: from wugate.wustl.edu  for gregory@wucmd.wustl.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id KAA13984; Wed, 10 May 1995 10:04:52 -0400
Received: from wucmd (wucmd.wustl.edu [128.252.137.1]) by wugate.wustl.edu (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id JAA10357; Wed, 10 May 1995 09:04:50 -0500
Received: by wucmd (931110.SGI/911001.SGI)
	for @wugate.wustl.edu:chemistry@ccl.net id AA03864; Wed, 10 May 95 08:46:02 -0500
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 08:44:01 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gregory Nikiforovich <gregory@wucmd.wustl.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:RMS FIts and Symmetries
To: given@tiber.nist.gov
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-Id: <Pine.3.07.9505100801.F3607-b100000@wucmd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



On Fri, 5 May 1995, James A Given wrote:

>   I have what I hope is a common problem. We are generating ligand
> conformations for use in drug design. The ligands we use can
> contain groups with various symmetries, e.g., benzene rings.  
> Does anyone know how to take such symmetries into account when 
> calculating RMS fit? 
> 
>   As a simple example of the problem that arises, imagine a 
> molecule with a plane of symmetry through its center. If the 
> molecule is flipped over and then superposed with the original, 
> the RMS calculation of the difference between the two should be zero. But a naive
> calculation of the RMS will not give zero, because the
> pairing of atoms induced by the superposition is not the
> identity pairing, i.e., the atom marked '1' in the original
> will not be coincident with the atom marked '1' in the copy. 

	The real trick is that in drug design you will have an "important"
	and "unimportant" atoms (or functional groups). So the only RMS what
	matters would be related to the "important" groups (i.e.: aromatics,
        H-bond donors/acceptors, ionized groups, etc.). In reality, you
	wouldn't encounter situations with the clear symmetry for the
	"important" groups. (Though, there are exceptions, like the symmetric
	HIV protease inhibitors.) On the other hand, if you are worried about
        non-coincidence of your atom "1" to a copy atom "1", what is the
        difference, if both atoms are the same, as in benzene case ?

##############################################################################

Gregory V. Nikiforovich                                   Phone (314) 935-4677
Research Professor                                        Fax   (314) 935-4979
Center for Molecular Design                            E-mail address:
Washington University                                  gregory@wucmd.wustl.edu
Lopata Hall, Box 1099
St.Louis, MO 63130

##############################################################################



From theochem@ctc.com  Wed May 10 11:05:13 1995
Received: from server1.ctc.com  for theochem@ctc.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id KAA15332; Wed, 10 May 1995 10:59:43 -0400
Received: by server1.ctc.com (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
	id AA19189; Wed, 10 May 1995 10:59:24 -0400
Received: by pauling.ctc.com (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for @server1.ctc.com:chemistry@ccl.net id AA24332; Wed, 10 May 95 11:56:10 -0400
From: theochem@ctc.com (Douglas Smith)
Message-Id: <9505101556.AA24332@pauling.ctc.com>
Subject: thermochemical data (follow-up)
To: chemistry@ccl.net (Computational Chemistry List)
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 11:55:33 -0500 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 945       


Dear All:

	Yes, the list of chemicals I asked for included energetics (i.e. 
explosives) and nerve gases.  Please be assured (for those of you who asked
and for those of you who worry) that this information is needed to study the
destruction of such compounds by novel methods, rather than for production 
or use of those compounds.
	Concurrent Technologies Corporation is a US Government contractor,
and I am working under the Army contract which operates the National
Defense Center for Environmental Excellence.
	Sorry for any worries.

Doug
-- 

Douglas A. Smith
Principal Technical Staff/Theoretical Chemist
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
1450 Scalp Avenue
Johnstown, PA 15904

voice:  (814) 269-2545
fax:    (814) 269-2798
email:  theochem@ctc.com

Stadnard Disclamur: All opinions, comments, mistakes, endorsements and odd
noises are my own, not my employer's.

I would rather be and optimist and wrong than a pessimist and right. 


From shenkin@still3.chem.columbia.edu  Wed May 10 11:50:12 1995
Received: from mailhub.cc.columbia.edu  for shenkin@still3.chem.columbia.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id LAA16766; Wed, 10 May 1995 11:39:12 -0400
Received: from still3.chem.columbia.edu by mailhub.cc.columbia.edu with SMTP id AA28682
  (5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK for <@mailhub.cc.columbia.edu:chemistry@ccl.net>); Wed, 10 May 1995 11:39:06 -0400
Received: by still3.chem.columbia.edu (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for @mailhub.cc.columbia.edu:gilson@indigo14.ccl.net id AA05515; Wed, 10 May 95 11:39:00 -0400
From: "Peter Shenkin" <shenkin@still3.chem.columbia.edu>
Message-Id: <9505101138.ZM5513@still3.chem.columbia.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 11:38:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: Gregory Nikiforovich <gregory@wucmd.wustl.edu>
        "CCL:RMS Fits and Symmetries" (May 10,  8:21am)
References: <Pine.3.07.9505100837.C3607-b100000@wucmd>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: Gregory Nikiforovich <gregory@wucmd.wustl.edu>,
        James A Given <given@tiber.nist.gov>
Subject: Re: CCL:RMS Fits and Symmetries
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net, gilson@indigo14.ccl.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0



Subject: CCL:RMS Fits and Symmetries
On Fri, 5 May 1995, James A Given wrote:

>   I have what I hope is a common problem. We are generating ligand
> conformations for use in drug design. The ligands we use can
> contain groups with various symmetries, e.g., benzene rings.
> Does anyone know how to take such symmetries into account when
> calculating RMS fit?

There are several ways of doing this.  The way MacroModel/BatchMin
does it is to define equivalence pairs of atoms;  for example,
if you have a phenyl group attached at the 1-position, two equivalence
pairs would be defined: 2-6 (the equivalent ortho positions) and 3-5
(meta). When calculating an RMS, our software would do it four times
for this ring, trying both possibilities for each pair, and would take
the lowest result.

Clearly, this could be done more smartly:  we could have a mechanism
to say that 2 and 3 (ortho and meta on one side of the ring) correspond
to 6 and 5 on the other, respectively;  then we would have to
calculate the best rigid-body superposition and residual RMS only
two times, instead of three.

A side-chain dressing program I wrote works in torsional space, and
does it another way.  The program is told that certain dihedral bonds,
such as chi2 of a PHE, TYR or ASP, and chi3 of a GLU, have 2-fold
symmetry.  (Another program might be smart enough to figure this out
for itself.)  Then any dihedral angle for such a torsion that falls
between 180 and 360 degrees gets 180 degrees subtracted from it
before it's compared to the analogous torsion in the other system.
(Of course, the mechanism is implemented in a general way; n-fold
local symmetry can be specified.)

Hope this helps,
	-P.


-- 
************************ The secret of life: *************************
*Peter S. Shenkin, Box 768 Havemeyer Hall, Chemistry, Columbia Univ.,*
* New York, NY  10027;     shenkin@columbia.edu;     (212) 854-5143  *
************* If you find a loose thread, don't pull it. *************


From doherty@msc.edu  Wed May 10 12:05:13 1995
Received: from noc.msc.edu  for doherty@msc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id LAA17005; Wed, 10 May 1995 11:50:34 -0400
Received: from uh.msc.edu by noc.msc.edu (5.65/MSC/v3.0.1(920324))
	id AA05814; Wed, 10 May 95 10:50:32 -0500
Received: from [137.66.12.173] (mac3.msc.edu [137.66.12.173]) by uh.msc.edu (8.6.8.1/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA08783; Wed, 10 May 1995 10:50:26 -0500
X-Sender: doherty@uh.msc.edu
Message-Id: <v02110101abd699c86da2@[137.66.12.173]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 10:50:30 -0600
To: "Sergei Vyboishchikov"  <SERGEI@ps1515.chemie.uni-marburg.de>,
        chemistry@ccl.net
From: doherty@msc.edu (David C. Doherty)
Subject: Re: CCL:Gear method


At 12:16 PM 5/10/95, Sergei Vyboishchikov wrote:
>A friend of mine looks for a Fortran source code for solving a
>system of stiff first-order differential equations implementing the
>Gear method. Any hints and advices would be appreciated.

Although this doesn't have anything to do with the
above request, I once saw Richard Gear in the movie
"Pretty Woman," and my company sells a "powerful-yet-
easy-to-use" program for Windoze which may do something
completely different than what you're looking for.

But what the heck, here comes the obligatory gratuitous
plug anyway:

<snip>

--

On the other hand, you may have some luck poking
around at netlib, for instance:

  http://www.netlib.org/ode/index.html
  ftp://ftp.netlib.org/ode/index

  http://www.netlib.org/odepack/index.html
  ftp://ftp.netlib.org/odepack/index

--

A snippet from the odepack description:

  1. LSODE (Livermore Solver for Ordinary Differential Equations) is the
     basic solver of the collection.  It solves stiff and nonstiff systems
     of the form dy/dt = f.  In the stiff case, it treats the Jacobian matrix
     df/dy as either a full or a banded matrix, and as either user-supplied
     or internally approximated by difference quotients.  It uses Adams methods
     (predictor-corrector) in the nonstiff case, and Backward Differentiation
     Formula (BDF) methods in the stiff case.  The linear systems that arise
     are solved by direct methods (LU factor/solve).  LSODE supersedes the older
     GEAR and GEARB packages, and reflects a complete redesign of the user
     interface and internal organization, with some algorithmic improvements.


  2. LSODES, written jointly with A. H. Sherman, solves systems dy/dt = f
     and in the stiff case treats the Jacobian matrix in general sparse
     form.  It determines the sparsity structure on its own (or optionally
     accepts this information from the user), and uses parts of the Yale Sparse
     Matrix Package (YSMP) to solve the linear systems that arise.
     LSODES supersedes, and improves upon, the older GEARS package.


---
David C. Doherty
Minnesota Supercomputer Center, Inc.
doherty@msc.edu



From gedeck@pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de  Wed May 10 12:07:28 1995
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de  for gedeck@pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id LAA17041; Wed, 10 May 1995 11:51:26 -0400
Received: from pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de (pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.120.2]) by immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de with SMTP
	id RAA17346 (8.6.12/7.4b-FAU); for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 10 May 1995 17:50:52 +0200
Received: from pc1.chemie.uni-erlangen.de by pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA15091; Wed, 10 May 1995 16:50:50 +0100
Received: by pc1.chemie.uni-erlangen.de (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA20214; Wed, 10 May 1995 16:50:47 +0100
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 16:50:42 +0100 (NFT)
From: Peter Gedeck <gedeck@pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Cc: Peter Gedeck <gedeck@pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Announce: MolEdit 1.0.b
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.950510162716.23566A-100000@pc1.chemie.uni-erlangen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hello

Recently, I announced version 1.0 of my program MolEdit on this forum.
Due to the fact that some people had problems to download the files
>from my FTP-server I uploaded them to ftp.ccl.net.

This is also a newer version of MolEdit (1.0.b) that allows to create 
HPGL-files of the graphical display, so that the pictures can be used 
in other programs. 

Additional information is available at the WWW-page:
http://pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de/~gedeck/moledit.html

To download the program either access my FTP-server (in Europe) at
pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de (131.188.120.2) in directory  /pub/moled

or use the CCL archives:
via anonymous ftp
  www.ccl.net in /pub/chemistry/software/MS-DOS/MolEdit
via gopher
  gopher gopher.ccl.net 73
    software --> MS-DOS --> MolEdit
via WWW:
  http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
    C.C.Archive --> Software --> software archives --> MS-DOS --> MolEdit
via e-mail
  send a message:
      select chemistry
      help overview
      limit 1MByte
      size 60kbytes
      cd software/MS-DOS/MolEdit
      dir
      get README
      get *.exe
      quit
  to MAILSERV@ccl.net

On both servers you can also find versions of the Babel program.

Yours,

Peter



Peter Gedeck
Inst. f. Physikalische Chemie I
Egerlandstrasse 3
91058 Erlangen
Germany

Tel: ++9131 - 85 7335  Fax: ++9131 - 85 8307
E-Mail: gedeck@pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de
WWW: http://pctc.chemie.uni-erlangen.de/~gedeck/gedeck.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------------


MolEdit 1.0.b
*************

Editor for Mopac-Files
======================

Introduction
============

MolEdit is an editor specially designed to prepare input-files for
quantum-chemical programs. During the construction of an input-file it
is always possible to check the correctness of the defined structure. In
case of errors MolEdit provides informative error messages for the
implemented input formats.

In addition the combination of the editor with a molecule-viewer allows
to examine the defined geometrical structure. This is especially valuable
for the creation of z-matrices. The molecule-viewer allows to rotate and
to translate the molecule. The structure can be displayed in five different
ways: 

 o Wire-frame 
 o Ball-and-Stick 
 o Dot-clouds 
 o Grid 
 o Spheres 

The combination of an editor with a molecule-viewer will make it very
easy for beginning students to learn to write z-matrices.

Other features included in MolEdit are: 

 o Formatting input-files 
 o Converting between different formats (Mopac <=> GIP) 
 o Deleting Dummy-Atoms 
 o Inserting and deleting of atoms (while keeping the references
   correct). 
 o Creation of HPGL-files 

In the current version MolEdit fully supports several file formats. These
are: 

 o The Mopac file format, which is used by the semiempirical
   program packages Ampac, Mopac and Vamp. 
 o The GIP (geometry-interchange-program) format 
 o The Xmol format 

Other file formats, among those the Gaussian-file formats are accessible
through the conversion utility Babel. MolEdit provides a interface that
simplifies the usage of Babel.

MolEdit is also able to load, edit and save UNIX-Files. The is useful, if
UNIX-filesystems are mounted via NFS.

MolEdit is a DOS-application written for the IBM-PC-AT and needs a
VGA or EGA-card, either monochrome or color. A coprocessor is
recommended but not necessary. In case the real-mode-version of the
program is used, either the use of expanded-memory or of a disk-cache
is recommended. The program was tested with
monochrome-VGA-cards and should adjust itself to this mode. 



From robert@bert.chem.wsu.edu  Wed May 10 13:05:13 1995
Received: from cheetah.it.wsu.edu  for robert@bert.chem.wsu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id NAA18709; Wed, 10 May 1995 13:04:24 -0400
Received: from bert.chem.wsu.edu (bert.chem.wsu.edu [134.121.43.22]) by cheetah.it.wsu.edu (8.6.10/WSUit-1.1) with SMTP id KAA25684 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 10 May 1995 10:04:22 -0700
Received: by bert.chem.wsu.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA06332; Wed, 10 May 1995 10:04:30 -0700
From: robert@bert.chem.wsu.edu (Robert B. Yelle)
Message-Id: <9505101704.AA06332@bert.chem.wsu.edu>
Subject: PDQP
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 10:04:30 -0800 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL13]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 798       


Hello,

	I am currently attempting to calculate electrostatic potential
derived charges for asymmetric biomolecules using the program GAMESS.  In
the publication 'Derivation of Net Atomic Charges from Molecular Electrostatic
Potentials' (J. Comp. Chem. 11(3):293-310) the authors, Woods, et al. describe
a program called PDQP which symmetrically distributes the atomic points about
a cartesian axis so that the ESP calculations work properly in GAMESS.  I am 
seeking information about this program so that I may use it.  Does anyone know
about this program or know where I may obtain it?  Thank you in advance for
any and all responses.

Rob
-- 

Robert B. Yelle
Dept. of Biochemistry/Biophysics
Washington State University
Pullman , WA 99164-4660
(509) 335-4083
EMAIL:  robert@bert.chem.wsu.edu


From glee@chem0sun.calstatela.edu  Wed May 10 23:35:24 1995
Received: from neptune.calstatela.edu  for glee@chem0sun.calstatela.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id XAA29669; Wed, 10 May 1995 23:31:29 -0400
Received: from chem0sun.calstatela.edu (chem0sun.calstatela.edu [130.182.171.14]) by neptune.calstatela.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA17076 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 10 May 1995 20:29:47 -0700
Received: by chem0sun.calstatela.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA14047; Wed, 10 May 95 20:27:02 PDT
Date: Wed, 10 May 95 20:27:02 PDT
From: glee@chem0sun.calstatela.edu (Ging Lee 12-06-90)
Message-Id: <9505110327.AA14047@chem0sun.calstatela.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Spartan 3.0 command



Dear netters,

Can someone please tell me how to go about simulating a thermodynamic
annealling process using command available from Spartan 3.0 package.
The system I want to minimize is a twelve units polystyrene oligomer.
I have been using MM3 force field available from the package, but I 
want to take it one step further.


Thanks a lot.


Ging Lee
glee@chem0sun.calstatela.ede
glee@chem0sun.calstatela.edu

From graham@sentex.net  Wed May 10 23:50:22 1995
Received: from granite.sentex.net  for graham@sentex.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id XAA29867; Wed, 10 May 1995 23:43:34 -0400
Received: from gu-ttyd6.sentex.net (gu-ttyd6.sentex.net [204.50.3.55]) by granite.sentex.net (8.6.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA00129; Wed, 10 May 1995 23:55:48 -0400
Message-Id: <199505110355.XAA00129@granite.sentex.net>
X-Sender: graham@mail.sentex.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 23:43:24 -0400
To: given@tiber.nist.gov (James A Given), chemistry@ccl.net
From: graham@sentex.net (Graham Hurst)
Subject: Re: CCL:RMS Fits and Symmetries
Cc: gilson@indigo14.ccl.net


At 02:50 PM 5/5/95 -0400, James A Given wrote:

>  I have what I hope is a common problem. We are generating ligand
>conformations for use in drug design. The ligands we use can
>contain groups with various symmetries, e.g., benzene rings.  
>Does anyone know how to take such symmetries into account when 
>calculating RMS fit?
 
 [Snip]

>  Is there provision in standard software packages for handling this
>problem?

The conformational search program that I wrote which is part of
the ChemPlus set of extensions for HyperChem optionally handles
this problem, without the need to specify equivalent pairs.

If the option is turned on, the program initially permutes atom
indices to find topologically equivalent atom orders. Although in
the worst case this would require comparing N! permutations, in
practice the program avoids generating permutations where the
elements or coordination don't match that of the initial atom
order. The permutations that it does generate are topologically
compared to the orginal and those that match are retained for use
in RMS comparisons. The program can also neglect hydrogens or
only consider specified atoms to further reduce the dimensionality.

Thus for cyclohexane with hydrogens ingored, it would use 12
permutations of the atom order for RMS comparisons.

I'm not sure if the program suits your purposes, since it doesn't
actually report the RMS differences. Rather it uses RMS deviations
(after faster initial screening comparisons) to determine whether
a produced conformation is equivalent to any already found. The
"match" thresholds and tests are user adjustable.

At 11:38 AM 5/10/95 -0400, Peter Shenkin wrote:

>There are several ways of doing this.  The way MacroModel/BatchMin
>does it is to define equivalence pairs of atoms;  for example,
>if you have a phenyl group attached at the 1-position, two equivalence
>pairs would be defined: 2-6 (the equivalent ortho positions) and 3-5
>(meta). When calculating an RMS, our software would do it four times
>for this ring, trying both possibilities for each pair, and would take
>the lowest result.
>
>Clearly, this could be done more smartly:  we could have a mechanism
>to say that 2 and 3 (ortho and meta on one side of the ring) correspond
>to 6 and 5 on the other, respectively;  then we would have to
>calculate the best rigid-body superposition and residual RMS only
>two times, instead of three.

For ChemPlus/HyperChem, one doesn't need to specify the equivalent
atom pairs. One checks the "Use equivalent atom orders" option in
a dialog box, and for this case it would only do up to two RMS
comparisons. (If the first was within a specified threshold it
wouldn't bother with the second.)

I'm curious to know if any other programs can systematically determine
and use equivalent atom orders for RMS comparisons...

Cheers,

Graham
-------
Graham Hurst, PhD <graham@sentex.net> or <graham@watcom.on.ca>
Cambridge, Ontario, Canada


