From D.Winkler@chem.csiro.au  Wed Jun 14 01:04:57 1995
Received: from auric.chem.csiro.au  for D.Winkler@chem.csiro.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id AAA10318; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 00:54:22 -0400
Received: from [138.194.40.148] (mac-40148.chem.csiro.au) by auric.chem.csiro.au with SMTP id AA17968
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for chemistry@ccl.net); Wed, 14 Jun 1995 14:28:39 +1000
X-Sender: win097@auric.chem.csiro.au
Message-Id: <v02110107ac0415e9718a@[138.194.40.148]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 14:30:54 +1000
To: anchodd@tasman.cc.utas.edu.au, chminf-l@iubvm.ucs.indiana.edu,
        aschin-list@nuscc.nus.sg, chemistry@ccl.net
From: D.Winkler@chem.csiro.au (Dr. Dave Winkler)
Subject: International Molecular Design meeting in Australia Aug 1995


Here is updated information.  Please excuse any multiple listings.  If
intention to register are received within the next week, late fees will be
waived.



          M O L E C U L A R   D E S I G N   D O W N   U N D E R

                     AUGUST 27 - SEPTEMBER 1 1995

                       CAIRNS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL,
                  CAIRNS, NORTH QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA

This meeting is the 14th Annual Conference of the Molecular Graphics and
Modelling Society (MGMS) presented in 1995 in conjunction with the 12th
Conference of the Medicinal and Agricultural Chemistry Division of the
Royal Australian Chemical Institute (RACI). Note that the venue has changed
>from the earlier posting due to a larger than anticipate response.

SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM
------------------

The program consists of sessions covering five technology areas and five
target areas:

Chemical Similarity  and Biological Diversity
---------------------------------------------
Keynote Speaker:   Dr. Jeffery Blaney, Chiron Corporation, USA

Macromolecular Assemblies: the Supermodels of Molecular Design
--------------------------------------------------------------
Keynote speaker:   Dr. Phoebe Stewart, UCLA, USA

Neural Nets and Fuzzy Sets
--------------------------
Keynote speakers:  Dr. David Livingston, Consultant, UK
                   Dr. Gerry Maggiora, Upjohn Pharmaceuticals, USA

Molecular Recognition
---------------------
Keynote speakers:  Dr. Barry Honig, Columbia University, USA
                   Dr. Regine Bohacek, Ciba-Geigy, USA

Molecular Dynamics:  Deciphering the Data
-----------------------------------------
Keynote Speaker:   Dr. David Osguthorpe, University of Bath, UK

Harnessing the Potential of Natural Products
--------------------------------------------
Keynote speaker:   Dr. Joe Baker, Australian Institute of Marine Science,
                   Australia

The Future of Peptidomimetics
-----------------------------
Keynote speaker:   Prof. Garland Marshall, Washington University, USA

Glycoproteins and Glycobiology- New Wave Pharmaceuticals
--------------------------------------------------------
Keynote Speaker:   Dr. Peter Colman, Biomolecular Research Institute, Australia

Focus on Australian Biomolecular Design and Development- Medicinal Targets
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keynote Speaker:   Prof. Graham Johnston, University of Sydney, Australia

Focus on Australian Biomolecular Design and Development- Agricultural Targets
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keynote Speaker:   Dr. George Holan, CSIRO Division of Chemicals and Polymers
                   Australia


CONFERENCE PROGRAM

All sessions and functions will be held at the Cairns International Hotel
beginning with the Welcoming Cocktail Party on Sunday evening and
concluding Friday lunchtime.  A Cruise to the Great Barrier Reef has been
organized on Wednesday to be followed by a barbeque dinner in the evening.
The Conference Dinner will be held on Thursday evening.

The conference program includes oral and poster sessions.  Oral papers will
be presented in plenary sessions during the day.  The Organizing Committee
will select abstracts for oral presentation from the abstracts submitted
with the registration form.  Poster presentations are a major component of
the scientific program with poster sessions on Monday, Tuesday and
Wednesday evenings.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF ABSTRACTS AND POSTERS

Abstracts must be prepared for all presentations, both oral and poster.
The original must reach the Conference Secretariat by May 15 for inclusion
in the book of Abstracts that will be provided at the meeting.  Two (2)
camera-ready hard copies of the abstract should also be provided in the
following style:

-  printed on one side of A4 bond white paper
-  12pt Helvetica
-  3cm margin on all sides
-  title in upper case
-  author(s) (full name) with presenting author indicated by *
-  the addresses of the authors
-  a single blank line should follow after the title, the authors' list and
   authors' addresses
-  full abstract in single spaced text


All abstracts for oral presentation will be refereed.  Successful
presenters will be notified by June 15.  Abstracts received after the May
15 deadline will not be considered.

ADVICE TO SPEAKERS

Audiovisual facilities will include dual standard 35mm slide projection,
video and computer projection, overhead transparency projections and white
boards. Speakers with other needs should contact the Conference Secretariat
as soon as possible.

POSTERS

Posters will be presented on vertical, velcro-compatible panels 1 metre
wide by 2.4 metres high.  Posters may be viewed during the day but
presenters will attend their poster during the assigned poster sessions on
Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday evenings.

REGISTRATION

A registration form follows.  Please complete the form and return  along
with your abstract and appropriate payment to the Conference Secretariat by
May 15.

Full registration entitles participants to the book of Abstracts,
attendance at all sessions including the Sunday Welcoming Cocktail Party.
The Wednesday evening BBQ and all morning and afternoon teas are also
included.  There are no single day registrations.

Registration Fees  (all prices are in Australian dollars: $1 = US$0.75)
-----------------

Members (MGMS and RACI)                    $440
Non-members                                $520
Students                                   $220
Late fee after May 15                      $80
Conference dinner (Thursday)               $50

Students are advised that they must complete the student section of the
registration form to qualify for student rate.  No registration fee will be
charged for accompanying persons.

STUDENT BURSARIES

The MGMS provides financial assistance to students.  Plese contact Dr. Mike
Hann, Glaxo Research and Development (mmh1203@ggr.co.uk) before March 30
for details.

The RACI is providing assistance for Australian students which includes
free accomodation in Cairns and, if funds are available, some assistance
with travel costs.  For further details contact Prof. Peter Andrews, Centre
for Drug Design and Development, University of Queensland
(p.andrews@mailbox.uq.oz.au).

CONFERENCE VENUE AND ACCOMODATION INFORMATION

Sessions will be held in the Grand Ballroon of the Cairns International
Hotel and poster sessions will be in the exhibition area and foyer outside
exhibition area.  A limited amount of accomodation has been reserved at
this 5-star hotel for the conference.  Check in is from 3pm.

Cost:  $175 per room, per night (max 2 adults/room)

Block bookings have also been made at 4 other Cairns hotels:

Reef Plaza:       $115 per night, per room  (4 min walk to conference venue)

Rainbow palms:    $115 per night, per room  (20 min walk to conference venue)

Rainbow Inn:      $115 per night, per room  (20 min walk to conference venue)

Uptop Downunder:  $45 per night, per room (max 4 adults/room)  (10 min walk to
                  conference venue)

The above accomodation prices are room only.

Delegates will allocated their choice of room on a first come first served
basis.

This is the peak season in Cairns and there are extremely heavy demands on
accomodation in the city.  Delegates are requested to pay a deposit by May
15 to secure accomodation.  The above rates are only for conference
attendees and their partners and are only available if booked through the
registration form.

TIMETABLE OF DEADLINES

Student bursary applications      30 March
Last day for early registration   15 May
Submission of abstracts           15 May
Last day for cancellations        30 July
Opening of conference             27 August

ADVICE FOR VISITORS

Average temperature in North Queensland in late August is 21 C.  Dress is
usually light and casual.  Hats, sunglasses and 15+ sunscreen are strongly
recommended for protection from the sun.

A valid passport with visa is required for entry into Australia by all
visitors except New Zealanders.

A variety of tours are available for accompanying persons.

The official language of the conference is English.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     R E G I S T R A T I O N   F O R M

1. DELEGATE NAME AND ADDRESS DETAILS

Name ____________________________________________________________________
      Surname                         Title   First name

Position _________________________________________________________________

Organization ______________________________________________________________

Postal Address ____________________________________________________________

               ____________________________________________________________

               ____________________________________________________________
               State/province     Postcode         Country

Telephone   Work __________________________  Home ________________________

Fax              __________________________  Email ________________________

Indicate membership         MGMS ____      RACI ____

Preferred name for badge ______________________  Surname: __________________

Name of accompanying person (if badge required) ____________________________

Special dietary requirements ________________________________________________

2. ACCOMODATION REQUIRED       __ YES       __ NO

Please indicate your choice of hotel and room type

Cairns Internat Hotel __  Reef Plaza __     Reef Inn __      Uptop Downunder __
  $175/room/night         $115/room/night   $115/room/night  $45/room/night

Max 2 adults/room except Uptop Downunder which is 4/room

Room type    SINGLE __     TWIN SHARE __    DOUBLE __   4 SHARE __

Sharing with (if applicable) ________________________________________________

Arrival date _______ Aug 1995      Estimated arrival time  ______________

Number of nights accomodation required _______  Estimated departure date _____

NOTE:  Rooms will not be held after 6pm on arrival date unless hotel advised

3.  ABSTRACTS

I wish to submit and abstract    __ YES    __ NO

I would be prepared to make an oral presentation if selected  __ YES   __ NO

Abstracts for all presentations should be submitted with this registration form

4. DELEGATE REGISTRATION

                     Registration    After 15 May

MGMS/RACI Members        $440            $520             $ ___________

Non-members              $520            $600             $ ___________

Students                 $220            $300             $ ___________

Accomodation deposit (rate for 1 night)                   $ ___________

Conference dinner (31 August)   _____ tickets @ $50       $ ___________

Reef Cruise (30 August)         _____ tickets @ $110      $ ___________

(I am/am not interested in an introductory dive/certified dive)

Extra tickets for accompanying persons only (free for registrants)

Welcoming cocktail party (27 August)  ____ tickets @ $25  $ ___________

Tropical BBQ (30 August)              ____ tickets @ $25  $ ___________

TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED                                    $ ___________

Please note that registrants after 15 May may not be supplied with satchels
and abstract books

Payment to be made in Australian dollars by cheque or money order  drawn on
an Australian bank, PAYABLE TO:  "Molecular Design Down Under Conference"
and mailed to arrive at the following address by 15 May 1995

     Molecular Design Down Under Conference     Phone   +61 7 369 7866
     c/o Organizers Australia                   Fax     +61 7 367 1471
     PO Box 1237
     MILTON QLD AUSTRALIA  4064

Send email via Ruth Drinkwater, Centre for Drug Design and Development,
University of Queensland (R.Drinkwater@mailbox.uq.oz.au)

5.  STUDENT REGISTRATION

I certify I am currently enrolled as a full-time student at ___________________

_______________________________ for a _________________________ degree course.

                                         Signature     ________________________

Supervisor's information

Name    ___________________________________________________

Address ___________________________________________________

        ___________________________________________________

Phone   _____________________________  Fax ___________________________

Email   _____________________________

                                  Supervisor's signature ______________________

The student accomodation to be provided by the RACI will be at "Uptop Downunder"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Cheers,

Dave

Dr. David A. Winkler                            Voice: 61-3-542-2244
Principal Research Scientist                    Fax:   61-3-543-8160
CSIRO Division of Chemicals and Polymers        CSIRO: http://www.csiro.au
Private Bag 10,Rosebank MDC, Clayton, Australia       http://www.chem.csiro.au




From s212647@student.uq.edu.au  Wed Jun 14 05:05:01 1995
Received: from student.uq.edu.au  for s212647@student.uq.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id EAA12149; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 04:57:14 -0400
Received: from student.uq.edu.au (s212647@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by student.uq.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.10) with SMTP id SAA08246 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 18:57:11 +1000
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 18:57:04 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: Alex Pudmenzky <s212647@student.uq.edu.au>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Software
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.950614185210.7896A-100000@student.uq.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Does anybody know if there is any software on the market (doesn't matter 
for what machine) that simulates chemical reactions on molecular level?

Please reply to my email address since I am not a member of this mail group.

Thanks, Alex
postgrad student

From wilfried@algc1.vub.ac.be  Wed Jun 14 06:05:01 1995
Received: from rc4.vub.ac.be  for wilfried@algc1.vub.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id GAA12707; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 06:00:12 -0400
Received: from algc1.vub.ac.be (algc1.vub.ac.be [134.184.36.11]) by rc4.vub.ac.be (8.6.10/3.4.2.ap (rc4))
        id MAA03726; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 12:02:21 +0200
Received: by algc1.vub.ac.be (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id LAA02498; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 11:58:11 +0200
From: "Wilfried Langenaeker" <wilfried@algc1.vub.ac.be>
Message-Id: <9506141158.ZM2496@algc1.vub.ac.be>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 11:58:10 -0600
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.0 26oct94 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: DGauss and point charges
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Dear all,

We are currently using the program Dgauss with Unichem. We would like to know
if it is possible to run a calculation with a background charge distribution.
This includes the input of the coordinates and magnitude of point-charges.

sincerely

W. Langenaeker
Free University Brussels

From WSMITH@msnet.mathstat.uoguelph.ca  Wed Jun 14 09:20:06 1995
Received: from ccshst06.cs.uoguelph.ca  for WSMITH@msnet.mathstat.uoguelph.ca
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id JAA14980; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 09:09:38 -0400
From: <WSMITH@msnet.mathstat.uoguelph.ca>
Received: from msnet.nw.uoguelph.ca (msnet.mathstat.uoguelph.ca) by ccshst06.cs.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA286075314; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 09:08:35 -0400
Received: from MSNET/MAILQ by msnet.nw.uoguelph.ca (Mercury 1.21);
    14 Jun 95 09:10:49 GMT-5
Received: from MAILQ by MSNET (Mercury 1.21); 14 Jun 95 09:10:31 GMT-5
Organization:  Dept. of Math & Stats.
To: Alex Pudmenzky <s212647@student.uq.edu.au>
Date:          Wed, 14 Jun 1995 09:10:27 EDT
Subject:       Re: CCL:Software
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
X-Pmrqc:       1
Priority: normal
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v3.1 (R1a)
Message-Id: <107786B7C@msnet.nw.uoguelph.ca>


Hello,

>From:           Alex Pudmenzky <s212647@student.uq.edu.au>
>To:             chemistry@ccl.net
>Subject:        CCL:Software

>Does anybody know if there is any software on the market (doesn't matter 
>for what machine) that simulates chemical reactions on molecular level?
>


I don't know of any software, but you have to define carefully what 
you mean.  Do you mean a couple of molecules at a time, or the "real 
world" - i.e high densities, non-ideal behaviour?

If you're interested in the latter, I doubt there exists anything 
(but I'd be pleased to hear of any).  

You might be interested in my paper "The reaction ensemble method for 
the computer simulation of chemical and phase equilibria. I. Theory 
and examples", in J. Chem. Phys., 100, 3019 (1994).

This addresses the "real world" problem at the molecular level, at 
least as far as equilibrium situtations are concerned.  As far as 
I'm aware, this is the only existing work on the subject (but again, 
I'd be pleased to hear of anything I'm unaware of).


Best Regards,


W. R. Smith                        Professor
                                   Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics
                                   and School of Engineering 
                                   University of Guelph
FAX: 519-837-0221                  Guelph, Ontario
Tel: 519-824-4120, ext. 3038       CANADA N1G 2W1

From jgryko@faculty.ceu.edu  Wed Jun 14 10:05:07 1995
Received: from nx.ceu.edu  for jgryko@faculty.ceu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id JAA15856; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 09:50:41 -0400
Received: from ac.ceu.edu (faculty.ceu.edu [144.39.100.2]) by nx.ceu.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA31606 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 07:12:42 -0600
Received: by ac.ceu.edu with NT SMTP Gateway ver 31
	id <2FDEE92E@ac.ceu.edu>; Wed, 14 Jun 95 07:50:38 M
From: Jan Gryko <jgryko@faculty.ceu.edu>
To: chemlist <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Summary of  Space Groups
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 95 19:14:00 M
Message-ID: <2FDEE92E@ac.ceu.edu>
Encoding: 3 TEXT, 115 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
X-MS-Attachment: SUMM.TXT 5150 06-13-1995 18:11




[[ SUMM.TXT : 4665 in SUMM.TXT ]]

        
       Summary of SPACE GROUPS  or How get atom coordinates
       in the unit cell from crystallographic data
       
----------------------------------------------

  From: RLINCK@smith.smith.edu

        The crystal builder module in Cerius does what you want.
                        Bob
----------------------------------------------
  From: MARTIN@cmda.abbott.com

  Cele Abad and TJ ODonnell have written such a program, TABLES, that also
  will display several repeats of the crystals...not display, calculate the
  coordinates of.

  If you want more information contact:

Abad@abbott.com
Odonnell@abbott.com

If these fail:

cele.abad@abbott.com
cele.abadzapatero.abbott.com
tj.odonnell@abbott.com

The second cele address should be
cele.abadzapatero@abbott.com

  @@@@@@@@@@@      Yvonne Martin, Senior Project Leader
             @     Computer Assisted Molecular Design Project
   @@@@@@@@  @     D-47E, AP10 2fl
  @          @     Abbott Laboratories
  @          @     100 Abbott Park Road
   @@@@@@@@@@      Abbott Park, IL 60064-3500
                   Phone: 708 937-5362 FAX: 708 937-2625

-----------------------------------------------------------
From: "Leslie Glasser" <GLASSER@AURUM.CHEM.WITS.AC.ZA>

The program Space Groups for Windows provides generated atom 
coordinates from an asymmetric unit.
It is available from Atomic Softek, 604-201 Jackson St W.,
Hamilton, Ont., Canada, L8P 1M2
Tel 905-528-4506  FAX: 905-528-9084

Leslie ==============================================================
(Prof.) Leslie Glasser                     Dept. of Chemistry    
E-mail: glasser@aurum.chem.wits.ac.za      Univ. of Witwatersrand     
Tel: Intl + 27 11 716-2070                 P. O. WITS 2050            
Fax: Intl + 27 11 339-7967                 South Africa               
Home Pages:  University      http://sunsite.wits.ac.za
             Chemistry       http://www.chem.wits.ac.za

-----------------------------------------------------------
From: cbas25 <cbas25@ccsun.strath.ac.uk>

The program INTERCHEM  which is available from QCPE includes an option to
derive all the atom coordinates for a unit cell (or nests of unit 
cells).  The program allows you to display the results in the usual 3D on 
SGI machines.  If you just want the method for doing it then it would be 
possible to abstract the relevant portions from the source code.  There 
are two implimentations of the method in the program, which take as input 
either the coordinates in the form of the Cambridge Crystallographic 
Database "XR" file or the CCD "FDAT" file.  In the former case the 
program uses built-in data on the spacegroups.  The "FDAT" file actually 
includes the data for the replicating matrices itself.  This tends to be 
more reliable, since sometimes there is ambiguity in matching up the data 
in the "XR" files with published tables.  

Incidentally, it was only when I came to program this stuff that I became 
aware of the fact that the most symmetrical space groups involve the most 
problems.  To get a nest of 3 x 3 x 3 (i.e.27) unit cells of the sodium 
chloride crystal requires the generation of many thousands of atom 
positions, and then the elimination of the identities.  There are 
probably easier ways of doing this, but not being a crystallographer, I 
tended to use a "brute force" method.
Yours sincerely
Peter Bladon

-----------------------------------------------------------
From: "AtomicSoftek@wchat.on.ca" <spacegrp@wchat.on.ca>

        The Crystal Builder of our product, Space Groups for Windows, will 
answer the question you posted through CCL.  Space Groups for Windows also 
have other capabilities, such as to show the position and symmetry 
distributions of all the space groups by both tables and 3-D graphics.  The 
program is designed for scientists and educators to obtain the information 
of space groups and quickly build crystals.  If you would like to have more 
information about our product, please contact me. 

Anne J. Tao


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <R29CLOSE@ETSU.EAST-TENN-ST.EDU>

  I have the old Oak Ridge crystallographic programs in Fortran
called ORFEE and ORTEP.  Both do much more than you want, but have
these functions built in.  One just inputs the xyz coordinates from the
crystal paper, and the unit cell parameters.  Then from the International
Tables one selects the tranformation information.  The program
generates the transformed coordinates.
  I own several commercial programs that cost a great deal of money
but are big dissappointments.  The have the transformation information
built in, but don't allow any modifications.  Therefore one gets a
fancy picture of the molecule, but so what.  Suppose one wants to
add molecules that are not in the unit cell.  Sometimes hydrogen
bonding is to neighbors not in  the unit cell.  What I like about the
Oak Ridge programs is that this dooesn't matter.  One can just invent
new unit cell transformations.
  Regards, Dave Close.


From dcav@loriot.lsmc.u-bordeaux.fr  Wed Jun 14 10:35:12 1995
Received: from loriot.lsmc.u-bordeaux.fr  for dcav@loriot.lsmc.u-bordeaux.fr
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id KAA16747; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:29:49 -0400
Received: by loriot.lsmc.u-bordeaux.fr (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA17807; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 16:32:22 +0200
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 16:32:22 +0200
From: dcav@loriot.lsmc.u-bordeaux.fr (Dominique Cavagnat)
Message-Id: <9506141432.AA17807@loriot.lsmc.u-bordeaux.fr>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Ab-initio Force Constants


Dear CCLers,

Ab-initio frequency calculations
give the force constants in cartesian
(units: hartree/bohr) and internal
coordinates (in atomic units).
Does somebody know the factors to
convert them in mdynes/angstroms?

Thank you for your answers

Christine Lapouge


______________________________|
Christine LAPOUGE             |
                              |
Laboratoire de Spectroscopie  |
  Moleculaire et Cristalline  | 
                              |
Talence                       |
FRANCE                        |
                              |
E-mail: dcav@loriot.lsmc.     |
	  u-bordeaux.fr       |
______________________________|                               

From sanja@indigo.irb.hr  Wed Jun 14 11:05:06 1995
Received: from indigo.irb.hr  for sanja@indigo.irb.hr
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id KAA17441; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:55:40 -0400
Received: by indigo.irb.hr (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id QAA01308; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 16:57:42 -0700
From: "sanja" <sanja@indigo.irb.hr>
Message-Id: <9506141657.ZM1306@indigo.irb.hr>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 16:57:25 -0700
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.0 26oct94 MediaMail)
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: NBO analysis
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Hy,

   I would like to learn more about the limits in the application
of Natural Bond Orbital method in studing inter- or
intramolecular interactions. I know, lot of work has been done on the
hydrogen bonded complexes and in studing anomeric effects, but is
it reasonable to use this method to analyse interactions that are,
for instance, 10 times stronger than that. For example, in  review paper,
written by A.E.Reed et.al. (Chem. Rew. (1988)917) is an example of Al4...CO
complex which have large total charge transfer energy (cca. 170 kcal/mol).
Authors comment that significant amount of nonadditivity in charge transfer
 energies is observed, due to the strong perturbation on the system, but they
didn't discussed the reliability of such analysis.
    Any comment or reference on this subject is wellcome  (sorry if the
question is trivial).
    I will summarise to the net.

   Thanx

      Sanja

-- 
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Sanja Sekusak                         e-mail: sanja@indigo.irb.hr
Rudjer Boskovic Institute             phone: (385-1) 46 10 89
HR-41001 Zagreb, CROATIA              fax: (385-1) 27 26 48           
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

From panigrah@mcs.anl.gov  Wed Jun 14 11:21:22 1995
Received: from antares.mcs.anl.gov  for panigrah@mcs.anl.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id LAA18063; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 11:18:23 -0400
Received: from clyde.mcs.anl.gov (clyde.mcs.anl.gov [140.221.11.2]) by antares.mcs.anl.gov (8.6.10/8.6.10)  with ESMTP
	id KAA20479 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:18:22 -0500
From: "Surya N. Panigrahy" <panigrah@mcs.anl.gov>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:18:21 -0500
Message-Id: <199506141518.KAA24230@clyde.mcs.anl.gov>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject:  CCL: Heat of formation for nicotinamides


Dear Netters,

	I will appreciate if some one can give me the reference for the heat
of formation (at 298.14 K) of nicotinamide, protonated nicotinamide and
1,4-dihydronicotinamide. Please send your replies directly to me. I will
summerize them to  the net.

Thanks.

-surya Panigrahy
panigrah@mcs.anl.gov

Bldg 202/A345
Argonne National Lab
Argonne, IL-60439.

From paulk@worf.procept.com  Wed Jun 14 13:15:01 1995
Received: from nic.near.net  for paulk@worf.procept.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id NAA02180; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 13:09:33 -0400
Received: from iris.procept.com by nic.near.net id aa07751; 14 Jun 95 13:09 EDT
Received: from worf.procept.com by iris.procept.com via ESMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
	for <@iris.procept.com:chemistry@ccl.net> id NAA13900; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 13:19:06 -0700
Received: by worf.procept.com (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id NAA06796; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 13:19:06 -0700
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 13:19:06 -0700
From: Paul Kowalczyk <paulk@worf.procept.com>
Message-Id: <199506142019.NAA06796@worf.procept.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: 3D-to-2D.Projections



Greetings,

I'm hoping that someone may be able to help me with a 'mapping' problem.

I have a set of (x,y,z) coordinate data that I would like to project
onto a 2-dimensional map - e.g. a Mercator projection, a Mollweide
projection or a cylindrical equal-area projection. Would anyone have, 
or know of sites that have, programs/algorithms for any or all of
these projections (or other 3-dimensional -> 2-dimensional projections)?

I'll summarize responses.

Thanks in advance for taking the time...

Regards,

Paul J. Kowalczyk
Principal Investigator
Procept, Inc.
840 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02139
	TEL:	617.491.1100 (ext. 3254)
	FAX:	617.491.5310
	E-MAIL:	paulk@iris.procept.com

From lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com  Wed Jun 14 16:59:57 1995
Received: from kodakr.kodak.com  for lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id QAA06912; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 16:47:02 -0400
From: <lrbu00@xd88.kodak.com>
Received: from euler.kodak.com by kodakr.kodak.com with SMTP id AA12953
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <@kodakr.kodak.com:chemistry@ccl.net>); Wed, 14 Jun 1995 16:46:12 -0400
Received: from xd88.kodak.com by euler.kodak.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/931108.SGI.ANONFTP)
	for @kodakr.kodak.com:chemistry@ccl.net id AA07123; Wed, 14 Jun 95 16:46:30 -0400
Received: by xd88.kodak.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA12128; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 16:32:31 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 16:32:31 -0400
Message-Id: <9506141632.ZM15966@xd88.kodak.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0.0 15dec93)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Comp Chem Chicago ACS Aug 20-24
Cc: McKelvey@kodakr.kodak.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Encoding: 2 TEXT BOUNDARY, 15 MESSAGE, 2 TEXT BOUNDARY, 118 MESSAGE, 3 TEXT BOUNDARY
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="PART-BOUNDARY=.19506141632.ZM15966.kodak.com"


--
--PART-BOUNDARY=.19506141632.ZM15966.kodak.com
Encoding: 12 TEXT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

This is the final schedule for the symposium:


-- 

John M. McKelvey			email: mckelvey@Kodak.COM
Computational Science Laboratory	phone: (716) 477-3335
2nd Floor, Bldg 83, RL
Eastman Kodak Company			
Rochester, NY 14650-2216

--

--PART-BOUNDARY=.19506141632.ZM15966.kodak.com
Encoding: 113 text
X-Zm-Content-Name: agenda2a.txt
Content-Description: plain text
Content-Type: text/plain ; charset=us-ascii






	New Parameterisations in Semi-Empirical Methods
		Fall ACS Meeting, Chicago
                    August 22/23, 1995

			Sponsored by

		 American Chemical Society
		    Biosym Technologies
	     Ciba Pharmaceuticals / Ciba-Geigy
                   Eastman Kodak Company
	     Hardened Materials Division, WPAFB
		     Merck and Company
	     Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation



Tuesday, 22 August

 1:40  Introductory Remarks 
J. McKelvey, Chair
Research Labs, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, N.Y. 14650-2216

 1:45
"Semi-Empirical Methods: An Overview"
Walter Thiel,  Organisch-chemisches Institut, Universitat Zurich, 
Winterthurerstr. 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland

 2:10
"Developing A Semiempirical Method"
J. J. P. Stewart, Stewart Computational Chemistry, 15210 Paddington Circle
Colorado Springs, CO 80921-2512

 2:50 
"Semi-Empirical Models for Transition Metals"
W. J. Hehre Chemistry Dept., University of Ca., Irvine, Irvine, CA 92717;
Wavefunction, Inc, 18401 Von Karman Ave, Suite 370, Irvine, CA 92715 

 3:30  Coffee

 3:45
"Semi-Empirical Calculations of f Electron Systems"
Michael C. Zerner, Quantum Theory Project, Williamson Hall, 
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611

 4:30
"Use of Semi-Empirical Methods in Direct Dynamics Calculations"
Donald Truhlar, Chemistry Department, University of Minnesotta,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455





Wednesday, 23 August

 9:00
"Building a Bridge Between Ab Initio and Semiempirical Theories of 
Molecular Electronic Structure"
Karl F. Freed, The James Frank Institute 
University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637

 9:40
"New Developments In Semi-Empirical Methods"
Walter Thiel, Organisch-chemisches Institut, Universitat Zurich, 
Winterthurerstr. 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland

10:25 coffee

10:40
"SAM1 Semi-Empirical Parameters for Transition Metals"
Andrew Holder, Chemistry Department, University Of Missouri-Kansas City,
5100 Rockhill Road, Kansas City, MO

11:20
"Parameterisation and Application of SINDO1"
Karl Jug, Theoretical Chemistry, University of Hannover, 
Am Kleinen Felde 30, D-30167 Hannover, Germany

12:05 Lunch

 1:45
"Development of an Atom-Typed NDO Scheme for NMR Predictions"
 Neil S. Ostlund, HyperCube, Inc, 419 Phillip St., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

 2:30
"COSMO-RS: Calculation of Chemical Potentials Based on Semi-Empirical 
MO-Calculations"
Andreas Klamt, Bayer AG, D-51368 Leverkusen, Germany

 3:15 coffee

 3:30
"New Semi-Empirical Methods for Molecular Modeling in in the Condensed Phase"
Chris Cramer, Chemistry Department, University of Minnesotta,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455


 4:15
"Improving Numerical SCRF Techniques for Ground and Excited States"
Timothy Clark, Institut fur Organische Chemie der 
Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, 
Henkestrasse 42, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany





 

--PART-BOUNDARY=.19506141632.ZM15966.kodak.com--



From bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu  Wed Jun 14 20:45:04 1995
Received: from server.chem.ufl.edu  for bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id UAA10086; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 20:35:03 -0400
Received: (from bartberg@localhost) by server.chem.ufl.edu (8.6.10/8.6.9) id TAA27398; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 19:47:50 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 19:47:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Gaussian on Unix PC... the summary
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950614193635.27366A-100000@server.chem.ufl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Hello all:

As promised, here is the summary of the responses I received regarding my 
question of G9x on a unix-based PC in light of difficulties (!!!!!!!) 
using the Windows version.

To refresh your memory, I am having a terrible time running G92 / Win, 
with chronic General Protection and Ilegal Instruction Faults.  It is 
highly irritating and equally unsystematic. (It runs fine for some input 
decks, crashes on others.)  The responses I recieved have suggested 
trying OS/2 or NT if I were to stay with the Windows version.  In 
addition, some other useful tidbits regarding other platforms is enclosed.

It would seem as though Solarix x86 is certainly worth trying out.  I've 
seen it and it's very nice... and quite speedy as well, although I don't 
have actual Gaussian source to try it out on...... 

At any rate, thanks to all who responded.

Regards,

Michael

*********

From: "Frederick P. Arnold, Jr. x8720" <farnold@wotan.duch.udel.edu>
To: bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu
Subject: RE: CCL:G9X compilation on Linux / Solaris

Unfortunately, I cannot help you with the G92 on PC platform, though I would
be interested in knowing your results.

However, may I suggest getting a copy of GAMESS from Mike Schmidt at Iowa
State U (mike@si.fi.ameslab.gov), as it is confirmed to compile under 
Linux using f2c, and probably will using the new g77-0.5.15.

Secondly, have you tried OS/2?  We had several windows programs that 
GPF'd much less frequently after changing to it here at Delaware.  
Testimonials to its effectiveness available from a mass-spec group using it for
production runs.

**********

From: "gregor t. overney" <overney@unm.edu>
To: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu>
Cc: Gregor Overney <overney@unm.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:G9X compilation on Linux / Solaris

  From you Email, I can conclude that you are trying a pretty impossible 
mission in running G92 on Microsoft's Windows 3.1. To be honest, Windows
3.1 is even too bad for crash-free word processing. 

  In our lab, we are using Linux, OSF/1, and (surprise !) Microsoft's
Windows NT 3.5. On all these OS, we are running MOPAC, GAMESS, and on the
NT platform only, also G92/DFT. The number of system crashes on OSF/1 are
as often as on NT. Linux seems even to be more stable. 

  Solution: I do not think that you get easily your hands on the source
for G92 and/or G94 (if you do, please let me know). Therefore a Linux
version will not be available within a reasonable amount of time.
Switching to a "real" UNIX workstation costs too much money (10 k$ and
up). Moving over to NT seems to be the best choice. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregor T. Overney, Ph.D.                         _\//__
Department of Chemistry                         / _  _ \
The University of New Mexico                   (  @  @  )
                                       +----.oOOo--()--oOOo.------+
Albuquerque, NM 87131-1096, USA        |  Email: overney@unm.edu  |
                                       +------------- Oooo.-------+
Phone: (505) 277-1665                       .oooO     (   )
FAX:   (505) 277-2609                       (   )     ) /
                                             \ (     (_/
                                              \_)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


**********

From: liang@chvxmw.chem.ncsu.edu
To: bartberg@chem.ufl.edu
Subject: Re: G9X compilation on Linux / Solaris

Hi, I have no experience on Gaussian/Windows, but if you think that the 
instability is largely due to other Windows programs (sure, Windows itself 
is also to blamed), and not because of Gaussian itself, you may try running 
your programs under OS/2.
Weigen


**********

From eloranta@voimax.voima.jkl.fiWed Jun 14 19:25:58 1995
Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 08:26:13 +0300 (EET DST)
From: Jussi Eloranta <eloranta@voimax.voima.jkl.fi>
To: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:G9X compilation on Linux / Solaris

I did some quick tests under linux with GNU fortran but at this time
the gnu ftn compiler lacks integer *2. Otherwise I just had to hack
the files under bsd/ directory. It shouldn't be very difficult task
when the next version of gnu ftn is released.

The g92 runs fine under solaris/SPARC but I would imagine that there
are no byte order dependencies or if there are they are easy to fix
since there seems to be defs for intel systems too.

Yes, the usual windows stuff. I don't have windoze systems running any more...
I switched to linux and been happy since ;-)

Jussi Eloranta


**********

From: "Klaus R. Liedl" <Klaus.Liedl@uibk.ac.at>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net, bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu
Subject: Re: CCL:G9X compilation on Linux / Solaris

Having a Linux Version of Gaussian94 would be in fact highly interesting
not only because of much higher stability, but also for performance 
reasons.

Tests with some of our own Fortran codes show,
that a Pentium at 100MHz gives about the same speed
(using f2c or g77 -the GNU Fortran compiler- under Linux)
as an IBM RS6000/550 ...
(This is also about what you would expect on looking at the
the SpecFP values.)

We just observed similar things that you describe.
If you want to make serious use of G92/Win you habe
to install a dedicated G92/Win PC, that is used for
nothing else but G92/Win.

Anyhow the problems with G92 under MS-Windows for sure
not emerge from G92/Win but from MS-Windows itself ...

best wishes

Klaus


**********

From: "Walter E. Reiher III" <WallyR@netcom.com>
To: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:G9X compilation on Linux / Solaris


I'm not a G92/Win user, but I am a happy user of Windows NT and wanted to
suggest that you consider that option.
     After working with UNIX boxes for many years, I nearly went nuts when
I started working with a new group that wanted to use PCs and I finally had
to learn DOS/Windows...it's *miserable*.  [You didn't mention running out
of "resources", my favorite.  :-)]
     However, I've now been using Windows NT 3.5 for a number of months now
and it's _really nice_.  None of that GPF, hanging, DUMBNAME.DOS, etc. that
you have do deal with under DOS/Win.  NT is also faster:  I've tried a few
little test cases and found that the same program on the same machine
running under a 32-bit DOS extender runs faster under NT than under DOS.
There _are_ some incompatibilities with some DOS/Win programs, so contact
Gaussian first, but I do think it's worth a try.


**********


From: Pedro A M Vazquez <vazquez@iqm.unicamp.br>
To: bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu
Subject: g92 on pc//unix

Hello
	Last year we ported GAMESS to FreeBSD, a free 4.4BSD Unix implementa
tion for x86 computers. After your mail I started to do the same thing
with gaussian 92. It seems it is possible to do the port. I'll keep you
informed.
	My experience with both GAMESS and G92 with workstations is:
	G92 needs losts of resources to do well, at least 32-64M of
ram and from 1-2Gbyte disk. While this is commonplace in the workstation
room it is rare when it comes to PCs. The only two pentiums with 32M
RAM we have here are PS2 machines and can't run FreeBSD or Linux. THe
other PC's are all 16Mbyte in RAM. Anyway I'll try on them.
	GAMESS, on the other hand, is very happy with 16M ram and
can do several kind of work.
	If you got answers on another people already running g92 with
Unix PC let me know please.

Regards

Pedro




From bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu  Wed Jun 14 21:00:01 1995
Received: from server.chem.ufl.edu  for bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id UAA10341; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 20:54:32 -0400
Received: (from bartberg@localhost) by server.chem.ufl.edu (8.6.10/8.6.9) id UAA27464; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 20:07:18 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 20:07:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Reactive sites... .a summary
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950614200150.27448A-100000@server.chem.ufl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE



Hello again....

A (rather long, I'm embarrassed to admit) while back, I posted a question=
=20
regarding the idea of correlation of a molecules regioselectivity with=20
some calculable quantity, thinking in terms of the suitability of, say,=20
the FMO model.  I was met with a number of interesting responses. =20

Apologies for the delay, but the original post and the summary of=20
responses follows.

Thanks to all who responded.

Regards,

Michael

**********

-ORIGINAL POST-


>
>Dear Netters:
>
>I would very much appreciate references concerning any methods used to
>correlate a given molecule's regioselectivity in a given reaction with a
>property calculable with ab initio methods.
>
>For example, using a simple FMO approach, we are taught that "attack" by
>a nucleophile on a given substrate are predicted / rationalized by looking
>at the AO coefficients at the LUMO of the substrate and envisioning
>maximum overlap in the transition state, etc etc.  The same goes for
>electrophilic reactions using the HOMO of the substrate; that (in this
>case) the electron density and overlap in a TS is greatest at the site
>with the greatest coefficient.
>
>Now, AO coefficients are easily generated in semiempirical programs,
>where they are generated from a minimal basis, and seem to mimic what one
>would generate from a valence-only, Huckel-type approximation (for example=
,
>look at the AM1 coefficients for ethylene, allyl radical, etc.)  With ab
>initio methods and extended basis sets, "reading" the coefficients in
>such a manner doesn't seem as plausible, as one obtains coefficients for
>each of the sets of functions used in the basis.
>
>I had asked a question similar to this some time ago; asking whether it is
>possible to obtain a "total" coefficient of a given AO at a certain MO, or
>whether one of the coefficients generated in this way should be "plucked
>out" and used as "the" coefficient.  The question was met with mixed
>sentiments without really ever getting any concrete answer.
>
>(By the way, I'm still very much open for suggestions here.)    :-)
>
>This brings me to the main question.  What is the "best" (if any) method f=
or
>correlating the types of reactivities I've discussed above, whether
>in polar (like discussed above) or in radical reactions, with either
>calculated coefficients, or some other property caclulable by ab initio
>methods.  Of course, total TSs can be calculated and the energetics
>compared, but it would be nice to have some sort of qualitative or
>semi-quantitative rationale for what governs these reactivities.
>
>I will certainly summarize if there is sufficient interest.  I hope what
>I have written makes some sense.    :-)
>
>Thanks very much!
>
>Regards,
>
>Michael

** AND NOW, THE RESPONSES.... **

From: Jack Smith <jas@medinah.atc.ucarb.com>
To: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Prediction of reactive sites

Michael:

  I would suggest you look into the concepts of chemical potential, global
(absolute) hardness/softness, and local softness (Fukui functions) as
defined by Yang and Parr in "Density Functional Theory for Atoms and
Molecules" (Oxford, 1989) and references therein.  Their definitions are
applicable to MO schemes as well, if one "equates" K-S orbitals with HF
MOs.  One can then perform the equivalent of a Mulliken analysis on the
Fukui functions (or local softness) to get "atomic" contributions (similar
to partial charges) - or even "bond" contributions.  I'd also look into how
this relates to Pearson's HSAB (Hard-Soft Acid-Base) Principle.=20
Nalewajski's work is also worth following.  Fukui's book "The Theory of
Orientation and Stereoselection" (Springer-Verlag, 1975) is also a must
read.

- Jack=20

**********

From: Jan Jensen <jan@si.fi.ameslab.gov>
To: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Prediction of reactive sites

Dear Michael Bartberger:

=09We have had some luck using molecular electrostatic potential
maps to predict and explain regioselectivity of Diels-Alder reactions.  The
references are:

George A. Kraus, Jun Li, Mark S. Gordon, and Jan H. Jensen, =D2Regiocontrol
by Remote Substituents.  An Enantioselective Total Synthesis of Frenolicin =
B=20
via a Highly Regioselective Diels-Alder Reaction=D3, Journal of the America=
n=20
Chemical Society, 1993, volume 115, pages 5859-5860.

George A. Kraus, Jun Li, Mark S. Gordon, and Jan H. Jensen, =D2Regiocontrol=
=20
by Remote Substituents.  A Direct Total Synthesis of Racemic Hongconin=D3,=
=20
Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1994, volume 59, pages 2219-2222.

George A. Kraus, Jun Li, Mark S. Gordon, and Jan H. Jensen, =D2Direct Total
Syntheses of Frenolicin B and Kalafungin via Highly Regioselective
Diels-Alder Reactions=D3, Journal of Organic Chemistry, in press.

These papers also contain references to similar work by Warren Hehre.

=09=09Best regards,
=09=09=09=09Jan Jensen
=09=09=09=09Dept. of Chemistry
=09=09=09=09Iowa State University


**********

From: rcfort@maine.maine.edu
To: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Prediction of reactive sites

Michael,
        I've had pretty fair success in predicting the regioselectivity of
nucleophilic additions to quinones by using LUMO coefficients calculated at
the 3-21G* level.  Since this is, of course, a split valence basis set, I
use the square root of the sum of the squares of the coefficients at a give=
n
carbon.  In most cases, this is simply two 2p coefficients.
        I'' be very interested to see your summary - if anyone else respond=
s.
        Regards,
                Ray

**********

From: "Robert K. Szilagyi" <szilagyi@indy.mars.vein.hu>
To: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Prediction of reactive sites

Dear Michael D. Bartberger,

=09I know my answer is a little bit far from your original posting but we
have some remarkable results on description of regioselective olefin metath=
esis
and polymerisation. The main difference is the method used.
=09Basicaly, we are using the molecular mechanical method (METMOD1) force
field. The ab-initio calculations performed only when no experimental data =
were
available. Please find the full publication list in our WWW server, under
research activity.

=09=09I hope this can help you,

=09=09=09=09=09=09Rob



**********

From: uscgckc3@ibmmail.com
To: bartberg@chem.ufl.edu

          Michael,
          You may want to look at the book "Experiments in Computational
          Organic Chemistry" by W.J. Hehre et al.  It is intended to be use=
d
          with the Spartan program but can be used with others.  I believe
          you can get it from Wavefunction, Inc.
 =20
          Anthony D. DeBellis
          Ciba Corp.
          uscgckc3@ibmmail.com

**********

From: John Liebeschuetz <johnL@proteus.co.uk>
To: bartberg@chem.ufl.edu
Subject: Regioselectivity


   Your question is one that exercised me greatly some years ago when
I was looking at regioselectivity of addition at C=3DC bomds. Basically,
I concluded there is there is no `best' method. You can and often have
to calculate different types of properties to explain different sets of=20
experimental data. I assume the reactions you are dealing with are
kinetically controlled.  For many `hard' reagents it is appropriate to=20
determine  the molecular electrostatic potential field and use that to
rationalise rgioselectivity. For `soft' reagents some sort of FMO=20
approach often works. We got a lot of mileage out of looking at what might
be termed a `perturbed functional group' approach. The molecular orbitals
involved in a given reaction to a functional group are often easily
identifiable. Although concentrated around the functional group, these will
in general have large contributions from adjacent filled localised sigma/pi
orbitals and the extension of the MO over these orbitals =20
can often be qualitatively used to explain the stereoselectivity of reactio=
n,
sometimes in suprising ways. For instance we were able to convincingly esta=
blish
how the interaction of a beta C-O or C-C bond influenced stereo and regiose=
lectivity
of addition to a double bond.

   The tool that worked in our case was to do semi empirical/ ab initio cal=
culations,
view the results graphically, and then interpret them qualitatively in a ma=
nner
intuitive to an organic chemist. This approach is one championed by such as
Warren Hehre and Leo Paquette and they have both published a number of
elegant studies.
=20
                    =20
                     Regards

                             John Liebeschuetz     Proteus Molecular Design=
 Ltd


**********


From: Steve Bowlus <bowlus@palres.dnet.sandoz.com>
To: "bartberg@chem.ufl.edu"@SNDZEH.dnet.sandoz.com
Cc: BOWLUS@sandoz.com
Subject: reactivity

I would be interested to see a summary of your responses.

My $.02:  In addition to HOMO/LUMO coefficients (broken down at whatever=20
level) is the ESP a (good?) index of reactivity?  This seems to be quite=20
generally computable, and certainly there are examples of this being used=
=20
in some cases.  I don't know whether the use is general or, if not, it=20
would be applicable to your problems.

sb

**********

From: "A.V.Sokolov" <abc@polytech.yaroslavl.su>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:TS compared with PMO; Prediction of reactive sites.

Hullo, chemists!

I have some comments on the topic.

To study validity of PMO calculations (pi-aproximation) I compared
its results with directly calculated activation energies,
NOT WITH EXPERIMENTAL DATA.
Using MNDO I got the following radical reactions TS (and so activation
energies):

CH2=3DCXY + HOO, CH3, CH3O, CCl3, CF3 and some substituted peroxy and
                                                         alkyl radicals,
where X is H, CH3, Cl, -COOCH3, -O-COCH3 or C6H5.

Having compared these act. energies with "charge transfer" energies of
PMO methods I dare state now that Frontier MO approximation is good
for nothing (in my case it fails completely).

So, FIRST: using PMO use full summing over set of MOs (or subset,
in pi-approximation).
Then, if you don't want to deal with a great deal of MOs, either:

1. project occupied shell on AOs of your reactive center and brood
   upon the coefficients and H{_i_i} of localized MO (when center
   is non-conjugated projection will give MO nearly 99% localized on it)
or
2. I can propose an additive scheme of PMO sums evaluation.
  (you need to calculate some sums beforehand to parametrizate your
  compounds. Each reagent gets 2 parameters, you can use them instead
  of FMO coefficients). I've tested it on my set of reactions.

BUT: all said doesn't mean that you will correctly predict results of
     direct calculations (in my case there were also strong influence
     of steric effect).

________________________________

Bye for now. Respectfully yours,
A. Sokolov,
Dept. of Phys.Chem., Yaroslavl Polytech. Inst.,  Russia
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

**********





From bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu  Wed Jun 14 21:30:01 1995
Received: from server.chem.ufl.edu  for bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id VAA10708; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 21:29:48 -0400
Received: (from bartberg@localhost) by server.chem.ufl.edu (8.6.10/8.6.9) id UAA27593; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 20:42:35 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 20:42:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@server.chem.ufl.edu>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: ESP derived charges
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950614202041.27521A-100000@server.chem.ufl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Hello all:

Of the various methods used to obtain electrostatic potential - derived 
charges (CHelpG, Merz-Kollman-Singh, etc) is there a method that is 
"favored" over others for the routine calculation of such charges?  I am 
interested in looking at polarity / charge separation effects in some 
organic radical cyclization / ring opening reactions and would appreciate any
insight, advice, references, and success / horror stories  :)  pertaining to 
the calculation of such quantites (not at all limited to radicals!)  and 
rationale for the use of a given method over another. 

Comparison / correlation of such computed values with some experimental
observables (rate studies as a function of substitution, results of 
Hammett studies (!) ) would be icing on the cake.

I will post a summary of responses if there is interest.

Thanks very much!

Best regards,

Michael

________________________________________________________________________________

 Michael D. Bartberger         bartberg@chem.ufl.edu        TEL: (904) 392-3580
 Department of Chemistry       bartberg@qtp.ufl.edu         FAX: (904) 846-0296
 University of Florida
 Gainesville, FL  32611
 USA
________________________________________________________________________________





