From bruno@copssg.univ-lyon1.fr  Wed Mar 20 07:17:36 1996
Received: from copssg.univ-lyon1.fr  for bruno@copssg.univ-lyon1.fr
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id HAA14968; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 07:17:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: by copssg.univ-lyon1.fr (950911.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH825/930416.SGI)
	for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net id NAA19407; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 13:17:08 +0100
From: "Bruno Fong-Ponne" <bruno@copssg.univ-lyon1.fr>
Message-Id: <9603201317.ZM19405@copssg.univ-lyon1.fr>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 13:17:07 +0100
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.2 10apr95 MediaMail)
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Retrieved eigenvalues from gaussian94 output files
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="PART-BOUNDARY=.19603201317.ZM19405.univ-lyon1.fr"


--
--PART-BOUNDARY=.19603201317.ZM19405.univ-lyon1.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dear CClers,

I perform some g94 abinitio calculation trough the Sybyl6.2 software to
evaluate the charges of a "gamma dodecalactone". The dat file from sybyl is :
%chk=g12r_g94_1903.chk
# HF/6-31G OPT POP=CHELPG SCFCYC=120
0 1
    8
    6    1 R2
    6    2 R3     1 A3
    6    3 R4     2 A4     1 T4
    6    1 R5     2 A5     3 T5
    1    2 R6     1 A6     3 T6
    6    2 R7     1 A7     3 T7
    1    3 R8     2 A8     1 T8
    1    3 R9     2 A9     1 T9
    1    4 R10     3 A10     2 T10
    1    4 R11     3 A11     2 T11
    8    5 R12     1 A12     2 T12
    1    7 R13     2 A13     1 T13
    6    7 R14     2 A14     1 T14
    1    7 R15     2 A15     1 T15
    6   14 R16     7 A16     2 T16
    1   14 R17     7 A17     2 T17
    1   14 R18     7 A18     2 T18
    6   16 R19    14 A19     7 T19
    1   16 R20    14 A20     7 T20
    1   16 R21    14 A21     7 T21
    6   19 R22    16 A22    14 T22
    1   19 R23    16 A23    14 T23
    1   19 R24    16 A24    14 T24
    6   22 R25    19 A25    16 T25
    1   22 R26    19 A26    16 T26
    1   22 R27    19 A27    16 T27
    6   25 R28    22 A28    19 T28
    1   25 R29    22 A29    19 T29
    1   25 R30    22 A30    19 T30
    6   28 R31    25 A31    22 T31
    1   28 R32    25 A32    22 T32
    1   28 R33    25 A33    22 T33
    1   31 R34    28 A34    25 T34
    1   31 R35    28 A35    25 T35
    1   31 R36    28 A36    25 T36

variables are
R2 R5 R7 R12 A7 T4 T5 T7 T12 T19

The problem occurs when I'M trying to retrieve the total energy with sybyl :
i've got :
The total energy could not be retrieved from the output file.
Examine the output file for errors or problems.

The eigenvalues could not be retrieved from the output file.
Examine the output file for errors or problems.

the last set of eigenvalues is :
Berny optimization.
 Search for a local minimum.
 Step number  10 out of a maximum of 216
 All quantities printed in internal units (Hartrees-Bohrs-Radians)
 Update second derivatives using information from points  5  6  7  8  9
                                                       10
 Trust test= 1.02D+00 RLast= 3.14D-03 DXMaxT set to 7.07D-01
     Eigenvalues ---    0.00191   0.00411   0.00474   0.00493   0.00494
     Eigenvalues ---    0.00495   0.00497   0.00499   0.00603   0.00957
     Eigenvalues ---    0.02578   0.03510   0.03574   0.03577   0.03582
     Eigenvalues ---    0.03583   0.03609   0.03644   0.03650   0.04119
     Eigenvalues ---    0.04792   0.04901   0.04913   0.04915   0.04917
     Eigenvalues ---    0.04918   0.04948   0.04959   0.05372   0.05550
     Eigenvalues ---    0.05644   0.05676   0.06258   0.07069   0.08157
     Eigenvalues ---    0.08388   0.08415   0.08463   0.08481   0.08494
     Eigenvalues ---    0.08496   0.08506   0.08565   0.08881   0.11342
     Eigenvalues ---    0.12209   0.12272   0.12290   0.12304   0.12306
     Eigenvalues ---    0.12314   0.12409   0.15546   0.15927   0.16000
     Eigenvalues ---    0.16027   0.20315   0.21825   0.21907   0.21909
     Eigenvalues ---    0.21914   0.21917   0.22233   0.23079   0.23312
     Eigenvalues ---    0.26196   0.28022   0.29279   0.29643   0.30152
     Eigenvalues ---    0.30312   0.30318   0.30348   0.30398   0.30529
     Eigenvalues ---    0.31008   0.32312   0.32605   0.32696   0.32722
     Eigenvalues ---    0.32733   0.32734   0.32735   0.32738   0.32741
     Eigenvalues ---    0.32747   0.32754   0.32784   0.32793   0.32843
     Eigenvalues ---    0.32978   0.33082   0.33182   0.33514   0.33807
     Eigenvalues ---    0.33874   0.33895   0.34265   0.36248   0.40330
     Eigenvalues ---    0.47765   1.003721000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.000001000.000001000.000001000.00000
     Eigenvalues --- 1000.000001000.00000
They seems to be very strange for me but I 'm not very familiar with ab initio.
So I would very pleased to know what's wrong  with my datas.
Thanks in advance

-- 
Bruno Fong-Ponne

LCOPS 
Universite Claude Bernard		tel (+33) 72 43 11 39
43 BD du 11 novembre 1918		fax (+33) 72 43 81 36
 F-69622 Villeurbanne			e-mail bruno@copssg.univ-lyon1.fr
 FRANCE



--PART-BOUNDARY=.19603201317.ZM19405.univ-lyon1.fr
X-Zm-Content-Name: g12r_g94_1903.dat
Content-Description: Text
Content-Type: text/plain ; name="g12r_g94_1903.dat" ; charset=us-ascii

%chk=g12r_g94_1903.chk
# HF/6-31G OPT POP=CHELPG SCFCYC=120

geometrie de depart obtenue par mopac PM3 chrg 

0 1 
    8
    6    1 R2
    6    2 R3     1 A3
    6    3 R4     2 A4     1 T4
    6    1 R5     2 A5     3 T5
    1    2 R6     1 A6     3 T6
    6    2 R7     1 A7     3 T7
    1    3 R8     2 A8     1 T8
    1    3 R9     2 A9     1 T9
    1    4 R10     3 A10     2 T10
    1    4 R11     3 A11     2 T11
    8    5 R12     1 A12     2 T12
    1    7 R13     2 A13     1 T13
    6    7 R14     2 A14     1 T14
    1    7 R15     2 A15     1 T15
    6   14 R16     7 A16     2 T16
    1   14 R17     7 A17     2 T17
    1   14 R18     7 A18     2 T18
    6   16 R19    14 A19     7 T19
    1   16 R20    14 A20     7 T20
    1   16 R21    14 A21     7 T21
    6   19 R22    16 A22    14 T22
    1   19 R23    16 A23    14 T23
    1   19 R24    16 A24    14 T24
    6   22 R25    19 A25    16 T25
    1   22 R26    19 A26    16 T26
    1   22 R27    19 A27    16 T27
    6   25 R28    22 A28    19 T28
    1   25 R29    22 A29    19 T29
    1   25 R30    22 A30    19 T30
    6   28 R31    25 A31    22 T31
    1   28 R32    25 A32    22 T32
    1   28 R33    25 A33    22 T33
    1   31 R34    28 A34    25 T34
    1   31 R35    28 A35    25 T35
    1   31 R36    28 A36    25 T36

R2 =    1.44020
R5 =    1.36993
R7 =    1.52956
R12 =    1.20736
A7 =   109.3301
T4 =   -12.7504
T5 =     9.4068
T7 =   122.0163
T12 =   177.7497
T19 =   179.6816

R3 =    1.54891
R4 =    1.52664
R6 =    1.11423
R8 =    1.10625
R9 =    1.10364
R10 =    1.10502
R11 =    1.10547
R13 =    1.10876
R14 =    1.52045
R15 =    1.10875
R16 =    1.52062
R17 =    1.10856
R18 =    1.10912
R19 =    1.52028
R20 =    1.10873
R21 =    1.10872
R22 =    1.52036
R23 =    1.10886
R24 =    1.10866
R25 =    1.52013
R26 =    1.10875
R27 =    1.10873
R28 =    1.52061
R29 =    1.10869
R30 =    1.10860
R31 =    1.51218
R32 =    1.10822
R33 =    1.10816
R34 =    1.09736
R35 =    1.09816
R36 =    1.09805
A3 =   107.5517
A4 =   104.9041
A5 =   109.7757
A6 =   105.1659
A8 =   111.4557
A9 =   111.2951
A10 =   112.7308
A11 =   112.6036
A12 =   114.4165
A13 =   110.4049
A14 =   111.4122
A15 =   108.9040
A16 =   111.1253
A17 =   109.9486
A18 =   110.1637
A19 =   111.1743
A20 =   110.0676
A21 =   109.9662
A22 =   111.3297
A23 =   109.9243
A24 =   109.9806
A25 =   111.2852
A26 =   109.9406
A27 =   109.9643
A28 =   111.3890
A29 =   109.9735
A30 =   109.9723
A31 =   111.4362
A32 =   109.8488
A33 =   109.8852
A34 =   111.2955
A35 =   111.5947
A36 =   111.6534
T6 =  -119.0318
T8 =   107.8176
T9 =  -134.4223
T10 =   131.4979
T11 =  -108.4989
T13 =   -44.5967
T14 =    77.9023
T15 =  -161.0369
T16 =   177.8882
T17 =   -60.0575
T18 =    55.8900
T20 =   -58.1899
T21 =    57.6716
T22 =   179.5675
T23 =   -58.3582
T24 =    57.4207
T25 =   179.5919
T26 =   -58.2938
T27 =    57.4843
T28 =   179.6577
T29 =   -58.2355
T30 =    57.5282
T31 =   179.5958
T32 =   -58.2448
T33 =    57.4147
T34 =   179.6741
T35 =    59.6787
T36 =   -60.3754



--PART-BOUNDARY=.19603201317.ZM19405.univ-lyon1.fr--


From pachterr@ml.wpafb.af.mil  Wed Mar 20 10:17:36 1996
Received: from riker.ml.wpafb.af.mil  for pachterr@ml.wpafb.af.mil
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id JAA17265; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:19:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cliff.ml.wpafb.af.mil by riker.ml.wpafb.af.mil (5.65/Ultrix3.0-C)
	id AA12593; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:19:05 -0500
Received: by ml.wpafb.af.mil; id AA12650; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:19:01 -0500
Alternate-Recipient: allowed
Auto-Forwarded: prohibited
Content-Return: allowed
Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
Conversion: prohibited
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
Sensitivity: Company-Confidential
Subject: Final Call for Papers
From: Ruth Pachter <pachterr@ml.wpafb.af.mil>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net (Reply requested)
Message-Id: <960320091859.628@cliff.ml.wpafb.af.mil.0>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 09:19:00 -0500
X-Mailer: MAILworks 1.7-A-1


Final Call for Papers

212th National American Chemical Society Meeting
COMP Division
August 25-30, 1996, Orlando, Florida

GLOBAL ENERGY MINIMIZATION AND PROTEIN FOLDING

Abstracts Due April 15, 1996

A symposium entitled "Global Energy Minimization and Protein Folding" will be 
held at the ACS Meeting in Orlando, Florida, during August 25-30, 1996. Topics 
will comprise, among others, of algorithms for global optimization, aspects of 
parallel computing, new methods for the prediction of secondary and tertiary 
structure, and large scale molecular dynamics and molecular mechanics 
simulations.

A partial list of invited speakers includes: B. Eskow (University of 
Colorado); C. A. Floudas (Princeton University); R. Judson (Sandia National 
Laboratories); J. Onuchic (University of California, San Diego); H. A. 
Scheraga (Cornell University); J. Straub (Boston University); D. Thirumalai 
(University of Maryland); A. Tropsha (University of North Carolina).

Submit Abstracts by April 15 to:
Dr. Ruth Pachter        
Materials Directorate, Wright Laboratory
WL/MLPJ, 3005 P St. Suite 1
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433-7702
Tel: (513) 255-6671x3158
Fax: (513) 255-1128
E-mail: pachterr@ml.wpafb.af.mil

Obtain Abstract Forms from ACS:
7by calling 1-800-227-5558 (press 9-4-0) 
by writing to:
7American Chemical Society
1155 Sixteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20036
7via the World-Wide Web: 
htpp:3/18/96/www.acs.org/memgen/meetings/abrqst.htm


From Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de  Wed Mar 20 11:17:37 1996
Received: from cd1.lrz-muenchen.de  for Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id KAA20275; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 10:45:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sun2.lrz-muenchen.de by cd1.lrz-muenchen.de; Wed, 20 Mar 96 15:49:20 +0100
Received: by sun2.lrz-muenchen.de (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA29974; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 15:49:08 +0100
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 15:49:08 +0100 (MET)
From: Eugene Leitl <Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
X-Sender: ui22204@sun2
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: CCL: any mechanosynthesis specialists in here?
In-Reply-To: <9603191528.ZM20454@dax.sci.port.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960320154634.28726E-100000@sun2>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




Does anyone mechanosynthesis computations, meaning AFM/STM
tip chemistry in here?

Thanks,

-- Eugene

From Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be  Wed Mar 20 11:26:01 1996
Received: from hartree.quantchem.kuleuven.ac.b  for Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id KAA20276; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 10:45:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: by hartree.quantchem.kuleuven.ac.be id AA36156
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>); Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:44:46 +0100
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:44:44 +0100 (NFT)
From: Steven Creve <Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be>
X-Sender: steven@hartree
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: CCL:problems with DFT
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.960320164042.18136A-100000@hartree>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hi,

From my own work and that of others, is has emerged that DFT has problems 
in investigating transition structures for H-radical reactions (additions 
and eliminations) with a low energy barrier. Often, the lack of exact 
Hartree-Fock exchange in some functionals is blamed for this.

I ask you all, if you have any references on this matter, let me know.
I'll summarize to the net.

Steven,


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Creve                       steven.creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be
Labo Quantumchemie                 steven@hartree.quantchem.kuleuven.ac.be
Celestijnenlaan 200F
3001-HEVERLEE                      tel: (32) (16) 32 73 93
BELGIUM                            fax: (32) (16) 32 79 92


From groeger@hp9000.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de  Wed Mar 20 12:17:39 1996
Received: from hp9000.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de  for groeger@hp9000.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id MAA21416; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 12:01:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [134.106.36.108]  by hp9000.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de (8.6.12/1.1.3)
	with SMTP id QAA10230 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:47:02 +0100
Message-Id: <v01540b00ad75e35b0727@[134.106.36.108]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:57:08 +0000
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: groeger@uni-oldenburg.de (Harald Groeger)
Subject: TS of phosphite anions addition reactions


Hi all,

does anyone have informations about calculations of TS of phosphite anion
addition to C=3DX bonds (X =3D O,N) using semiempirical methods ? Any
information would be greatly appreciated.
=46urthermore any references to semiempirical calculations on phosphite
anions and derivatives would be most welcome.  I will summarize the
responses to the net.

Thanks in advance to all responders,

Harald

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

Harald Groeger
=46achbereich Chemie
Universit=E4t Oldenburg
Postfach 2503
26111 Oldenburg
Germany

E-Mail: groeger@hp9000.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------





From WILLSD@conrad.appstate.edu  Wed Mar 20 13:17:43 1996
Received: from listserv.appstate.edu  for WILLSD@conrad.appstate.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id MAA21519; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 12:20:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spd.appstate.edu ([152.10.1.23]) by listserv.appstate.edu with ESMTP id <13720-151>; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 12:20:09 -0500
Received: from conrad.appstate.edu by conrad.appstate.edu (PMDF V5.0-6 #8642)
 id <01I2K7YY2SVKAFU5BQ@conrad.appstate.edu>; Wed,
 20 Mar 1996 12:19:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 	Wed, 20 Mar 1996 12:19:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: willsd@conrad.appstate.edu
Subject: Transition States & Unichem (Summary)
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Cc: mw8519 <mw8519@conrad.appstate.edu>
Message-id: <Pine.PMDF.3.91.960320121032.631262582A-100000@conrad.appstate.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Many thanks to all who responded to my question about using unichem
in the search for transition states.  The responses fell into two 
categories: 1) don't use unichem for this (at least not without help
from some other program), and 2) look at url xxx for information on
general features of ts searching.  The urls were quite helpful....

The original post was:



I would like to learn about using unichem (initially just the semi-empirical
methods, but later dgauss and/or gaussian) to model transition states. I
thought a simple case to start with would be the keto-enol transition state
for 2-butanone.  In MOPAC and gaussian there are methods to help get close
to the transition state (saddle and lst or qst) that start with initial state
and final state geometries.  Unichem does have an option to optimize to
a transistion state, but seems to lack the tools needed to find an 
approximate structure that is close enough for the optimizer to take over.
I have made several unsucessful attempts at "guessing" what this ts might
look like, but so far have not found a good enough guess.  I am using 
unichem's implementation of am1, and so far have only found structures whose
gradients are too large for computation of frequencies, and so I have no
confidence that I have found the ts.

Any suggestions?

********************************************************************

Just a simple suggestion based on my own limited experience:  if the
reaction coordinate can be expressed in a realatively simple way in terms
of the length of a single interatomic distance (eg, H---O), then a reaction
coordinate driving process, which constrains and optimizes the structure at
successively smaller (or larger) distances can often be a quick and easy
way to find the approximate TS.  Why not give it a try.

 Eilert Ofstead

**************************************************************************

I am also using programs such as MOPAC and Gaussian to calculate 
transition states (hetero Diels-Alder) and have found very quickly 
that manuals and other peoples experience in the area is very 
limited.  I would be greatful if you could share and answers that are 
passed to you directly, avoiding CCL.  If you have any problems in 
the future with Gaussian, try doug.fox@gaussian.com as he has been 
very helpful to me.

Yours
Carl Windsor

*********************************************************************

Please do not use my name or my affiliation if you happen 
to summarize the answers to your question. The 
straightforward answer to your question about doing 
transition state optimizations in the Unichem package is 
 ... don't do it! Use Mopac if you wish for semiempirical 
methods or use Gaussian for molecular orbital and DFT 
methods. Experience has shown me that the transition 
state optimizer is NOT robust at all in the Unichem 
package for either the semiempirical or DFT methods. 
Someday this will change, I'm sure.

********************************************************************

Re the query about finding the 2-butanone keto/enol TS: one possibility is to 
find the keto/enol TS for the _simplest_ keto/enol tautomerization, ethanal/
ethenol (acetaldehyde/ vinyl alcohol), then replace the appropriate H's by
CH3 groups, and subject this new structure to a TS optimization.
Errol Lewars

*******************************************************************

Yes, it's true UniChem lacks multi-structure input routines.  Given that
semiempirical methods that have them require a half-guess at the structure
to not thrash [or at least they have in my cases!]  You might be best off
doing a reaction coordinate.  If you absolutely insist on having Unichem
do your z-matrix, instead of doing it by hand, get Babel to let you convert
to a z-matrix you can manipulate to vary the reaction coordinate.  Using
the structure closest to the TS in UniChem [use Babel to convert it to PDB
so UniChem can read it] may work.

Another approach is to use a known TS as a guess for yours.  I believe that
Warren Hehre & co-workers give such a structure in some of the books they've
written for use with the Spartan code - you can do most of the exercises
they give with UniChem, & they give LOTS of examples of TS's for organic
reactions.     If you don't have access to the books, I recommend a lit.
search for an analogous TS to use as an initial guess.

Good luck!
Irene Newhouse

*********************************************************************

I don't know exactly about Unichem, but why use it
if MOPAC itself has provisions to locate a TS?
You can do grid search by varying two variables,
which could be C--H and O--H distances in this case.
Gnuplot will even make a plot of the output, if
the grid of numbers isn't enough.
This procedure will allow you to get very close
to the TS, from you can apply the TS keyword.
Exactly this procedure is the subject of a
www course I composed:
http://www.caos.kun.nl/~borkent/compcourse/comp.html
Best regards,

  *****    J.H. (Hens) Borkent, CAOS/CAMM Center,

*****************************************************************

Why not have a look at the WWW pages I have setup that include a number of TSs
 (fully optimized 
and characterized) from PM3 and AM1 calculations. These should give you a good
 starting point for 
experimentation on a number of derivatives or alternative parameter sets. If
 you (or anyone else for 
that matter) has TSs that there willing to share with others I would welcome
 them being deposited 
at this location. The URL is:
http://http1.brunel.ac.uk:8080/depts/chem/ch241s/re_view/re_view.htm

Addtionally, if you (or anyone else) generates TSs via semi-empirical methods
 I would be prepared to 
help generate an animation sequence and multi-structure file of the reaction
 being simulated. 

Please contact me if your interested.

 Dr. Jeff Gosper                                         

***********************************************************************

Hi 

I'm using Dgauss for TS, but my way to obtain TS structure is via MOPAC . 
First of all I prepare the approximation of TS by AM1 or PM3 method than 
I do calculation using DGauss or Gamess. I send you the TS state for this 
reactinon obtained by MOPAC. 

Stanislaw Oldziej

am1 results snipped out.....


************************END of SUMMARY*************************


So, I tried some of the listed ts structures in the web pages and found that
unichem's semi-empirical methods would verify that these were in fact ts
structures, when I asked unichem to optimize to a transition state (starting
from a structure that was very, very close..) the semi-empirical code
converged to a quite different, energy minimum structure.  The ts optimizer
for DGAUSS was more robust and would optimize to a ts, given a good initial
guess and a semi-empirical hessian...

The web pages of Borkent and Gosper referred to above were particularly
helpful.

I will stick to MOPAC and Gaussian (and perhaps DGAUSS) for this sort of work.

Steve Williams
Chemistry
ASU
Boone, NC 28608 

From klein@cgl.ucsf.EDU  Wed Mar 20 14:17:39 1996
Received: from socrates.ucsf.EDU  for klein@cgl.ucsf.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id NAA23164; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 13:27:36 -0500 (EST)
From: <klein@cgl.ucsf.EDU>
Received: (from klein@localhost) by socrates.ucsf.EDU (8.7.3/GSC4.25)
	id KAA17467; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 10:27:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 10:27:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199603201827.KAA17467@socrates.ucsf.EDU>
To: announce@santafe.edu, chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Modern Concepts in Macromolecular Modeling (Call for Papers)



			      Call for Papers

		  Modern Concepts in Macromolecular Modeling

                         Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing
			    (http://cgl.ucsf.edu/psb)
			 Ritz-Carlton Kapalua, Maui, Hawaii
				January 6-9, 1997

Co-chairs Chairs:   Jurgen Bajorath, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research Institute
		    Teri E. Klein, University of California, San Francisco


The Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB-97) is an international, multidisciplinary conference for the presentation and discussion of current
research in the theory and application of computational methods in problems
of biological significance.

We are currently soliciting manuscripts for a highly interactive workshop-like 
session "Modern Concepts in Macromolecular Modeling" and/or abstracts for an
accompanying poster session. The session will assess state-of-the-art
approaches in the area of macromolecular modeling, in particular protein
modeling, to highlight their opportunities, caveats, and limitations.
Contributions which introduce or illustrate novel computational methods and
which present contemporary applications are equally encouraged.


Scientific focal points include:

 * the development and application of various energy functions for

	- analysis of the energetics and dynamics of macromolecular
	  structures and their interactions

	- protein fold recognition 
	
	- ab initio folding of proteins on the computer

	- evaluation and assessment of molecular models


 * techniques to construct protein models in the presence of "twilight zone" 
	sequence similarities such as

	- analysis of multiple sequences and/or structures

	- generation of sequence-structure alignments

	- interactive or automated computer modeling programs


Scientific context:

While the use of predictive methods to generate and analyze three-dimensional 
models is increasing, the objectives of such modeling and the problems 
involved are changing. Classical homology modeling on the basis of significant
sequence similarity has more or less introduced macromolecular modeling at  
times when only a rather limited number of experimentally determined protein 
structures were available. The scenario has changed dramatically. Many more
structures have been determined, and it is a significant task in itself to
compare, analyze, and classify these structures. It has become possible to
study many intra- and intermolecular interactions in detail, and much effort
is currently being spent to understand such interactions in more quantitative
energetic terms; be it on the basis of various (free) energy calculations
or automated docking procedures. Implications of these studies for drug or
protein design are evident. 

Sequence databases grow at even much faster pace than structural databases, 
and this is considered a major reason for the increasing interest in modeling. 
However, popular targets of protein modeling attempts often display, if at all,
low or barely detectable sequence similarities to known structures. In these
cases, it is difficult to establish structural relationships, even if they 
exist, and to identify structural templates for modeling. The advent of 
inverse folding and fold recognition methods has changed the approach to some 
of these problems. Nevertheless, to apply the results of a fold recognition
study, to generate a precise and global sequence-structure alignment, and to 
actually build a model remains difficult and still requires many subjective 
decisions. In parallel to novel structure-based or comparative approaches,
computational ab initio folding of (small) proteins is, for the first time,
successfully performed, albeit at still limited resolution.



INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS

PSB '97 will publish peer-reviewed full papers in an archival proceedings.  
Each accepted paper will be allocated 12 pages in the proceedings volume.  
Manuscripts adhering to the guidelines set forth on the the PSB web pages
will be accepted. Full papers must not have been previously presented or 
published, nor currently submitted for journal publication.  Once accepted to 
the conference, a paper may be submitted for journal publication. Each 
manuscript will be refereed by at least four reviewers. 

  Due dates
  --------------
  May       15, 1996	     300 word abstract to bajorath@protos.bms.com
  June      15, 1996         Five copies of the manuscript
  August    15, 1996         Notification of accepted papers
  September 15, 1996         Accepted camera ready manuscripts 

Five copies of all full papers must be submitted to: 
			   
		 PSB-97
	         c/o Section on Medical Informatics
	         Stanford University Medical School, MSOB X215
	         Stanford, CA 94305-5479  USA

Authors who do not wish to submit a full paper are welcome to submit 1-2 page 
abstract adhering to the guidelines set forth on the PSB web pages, which will 
be distributed at the meeting separately from the archival proceedings. 

  Due dates
  --------------
  May       15, 1996	     300 word abstract to bajorath@protos.bms.com
  August    15, 1996         Notification of accepted abstract/poster
  September 15, 1996         Accepted camera ready abstract 


Please send abstracts and questions regarding this session to:

Jurgen Bajorath			
Bristol-Myers Squibb Res. Inst.        
3005 First Avenue                    
Seattle, WA 98121                   
bajorath@protos.bms.com           
klein@cgl.ucsf.edu
Tel  (206) 727-3612             
Fax  (206) 727-3602           


For more information on the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, please see
our web site at http://cgl.ucsf.edu/psb or contact: 

Ms. Sharon Surles
PSB Coordinator
Interactive Simulations, Inc.
5330 Carroll Canyon Road, Suite 203
San Diego, CA  92121
psb@intsim.com
Phone: +1 (619) 658-9782
FAX:   +1 (619) 658-9463

From JOHNSONB@B.PSC.EDU  Wed Mar 20 16:17:50 1996
Received: from B.PSC.EDU  for JOHNSONB@B.PSC.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id QAA25657; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:09:30 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:08:57 -0500 (EST)
From: JOHNSONB@CPWSCA.PSC.EDU
To: Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be
CC: JOHNSONB@CPWSCA.PSC.EDU, chemistry@www.ccl.net
Message-Id: <960320160857.2020597e@CPWSCA.PSC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Problems with DFT for reaction barriers


Dear Dr. Creve,

>From my own work and that of others, is has emerged that DFT has problems 
>in investigating transition structures for H-radical reactions (additions 
>and eliminations) with a low energy barrier. Often, the lack of exact 
>Hartree-Fock exchange in some functionals is blamed for this.

We published a study on this type of problem after finding that
regular Kohn-Sham DFT is generally a complete failure for radical H
abstractions.  We took a step back and examined the simplest such
reaction, H + H2 -> H2 + H, and found that much of the problem can be
traced to the spurious self-interaction of the electrons in
approximate density functionals.  The effect can be dramatic: for the
LSDA, regular KS theory predicts H3 to be *stable* with respect to
H + H2 (!) but after a simple approximate self-interaction correction
(SIC) to the potential surface the transition structure was restored.
The reference is

B.G. Johnson, C.A. Gonzalez, P.M.W. Gill and J.A. Pople,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 221, 100 (1994).

I don't really agree with the lack of HF exchange as the explanation
for the poor performance of DFT in the case of reaction barriers.
"Hybrid" functionals like B3LYP have been shown to give good results
on some reaction barriers in practice, but it is worrisome that the
methods being mixed in these hybrids, i.e. Hartree-Fock and pure DFT,
give reaction barriers which are significantly higher than experiment
in one case (HF) and significantly lower than experiment in the other
(DFT).  This leads one to wonder whether the good hybrid results
simply come from fortuitous cancellation of errors -- the effect of
the spurious residual self-energy in DFT roughly cancelling that of
the neglect of electron correlation in Hartree-Fock.

Having said this, SIC is certainly more difficult and expensive to do
rigorously in practice than to use a hybrid HF-DFT functional; I do
think, though, that one should be cautious of the results when using
hybrid methods for this type of problem, for the reasons mentioned
above.

Regards,
Benny Johnson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benny G. Johnson, Ph.D.		Phone:  (412) 828-7106
President			Fax:    (412) 828-0483
Q-Chem, Inc.			E-mail: johnsonb@psc.edu
317 Whipple St.
Pittsburgh, PA  15218
USA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From insenk@sbu.ac.uk  Wed Mar 20 17:24:24 1996
Received: from psb.sbu.ac.uk  for insenk@sbu.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id QAA26435; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:39:54 -0500 (EST)
From: <insenk@sbu.ac.uk>
Received: from HYDRA (BIG::SYSTEM) by PSB (MX V4.2 VAX) with SMTP (DECnet);
          Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:40:11 GMT
Received: by vax.sbu.ac.uk (MX V4.2 VAX) with SITE; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:39:17
          GMT
Received: by vax.sbu.ac.uk (MX V4.2 VAX) with SITE; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:38:23
          GMT
Received: from PSB (PSB::SYSTEM) by BIG (MX V4.1 VAX) with SMTP (DECnet); Sat,
          16 Mar 1996 05:03:07 GMT
Received: from www.ccl.net by psb.sbu.ac.uk (MX V4.1 VAX) with SMTP;
          Fri, 15 Mar 1996 23:47:21 GMT
Received: for chemistry-request@www.ccl.net by www.ccl.net
          (8.7.1/950822.1) id SAA00051; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 18:17:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from harfang.CC.UMontreal.CA  for hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA by
          www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id SAA29965; Fri, 15 Mar 1996
          18:00:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA [132.204.10.20]) by
          harfang.CC.UMontreal.CA with ESMTP id RAA28647 (8.6.11/IDA-1.6 for
          <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>); Fri, 15 Mar 1996 17:59:56 -0500
Received: from cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA by eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA
          (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/5.17) id RAA06688; Fri, 15 Mar 1996
          17:59:56 -0500
Received: by cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/5.17) id
          RAA13452; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 17:59:55 -0500
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 17:59:55 -0500
Message-ID: <199603152259.RAA13452@cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: CCL:File format question
Originally-From: 	hinsenk@ere.umontreal.ca


I am trying to prepare a somewhat special picture with XMol. To do so
I must be able to feed connectivity information into the program.
But the only two file formats understood by XMol for which I have
documentation are PDB and XYZ. XYZ does not allow connectivity
data, and the PDB connectivity records seem to be ignored by XMol.

Therefore I am looking for a file format that satisfies the following
requirements:
1) It is understood by XMol, including connectivity information.
2) Its description is publicly available.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen                     | E-Mail: hinsenk@ere.umontreal.ca
Departement de chimie             | Tel.: +1-514-343-6111 ext. 3953
Universite de Montreal            | Fax:  +1-514-343-7586
C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-Ville     | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/Nederlands/
Montreal (QC) H3C 3J7             | Francais (phase experimentale)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
-- Original Sender Envelope Address: hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA
-- Original Sender From: Address: hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA
CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
             Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html


From aholder@cctr.umkc.edu  Wed Mar 20 17:29:19 1996
Received: from axp2.umkc.edu  for aholder@cctr.umkc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id QAA26402; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:36:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from andy.chem.umkc.edu (holder.chem.umkc.edu) by axp2.umkc.edu (MX
          V4.1 AXP) with SMTP; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 15:36:33 CST
X-Mailer: InterCon TCP/Connect II 2.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9603201536.AA27234@andy.chem.umkc.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 15:36:27 -0500
From: "Andy Holder" <aholder@cctr.umkc.edu>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: ** Visit Semichem at ACS **
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed;boundary=part_AD75D67B000223BD00000001



--part_AD75D67B000223BD00000001
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: Inline

    *********************************************************
    * Come and Visit Semichem in Booth 1328 in New Orleans! *
    *********************************************************

Semichem will be showing AMPAC 5.1 with Graphical User Interface and
our new QSAR offering, CODESSA.  

CODESSA is a state-of-the-art  QSAR/QSPR program  that will allow you 
to extract descriptor  data directly  from your AMPAC files.  CODESSA 
also computes many of the popular  topological and reactivity indices 
directly.  CODESSA's statistical package automates  correlation anal-
ysis and allows speedy and  meanigful interpretation  and development 
of models to fit your specific needs. Spend your time thinking rather 
than doing time-consuming and tedious clerical tasks!  Make the right 
choices the first time, integrating all of the knowledge available to
you.

AMPAC  5.1  with  GUI  has  several  new  features including enhanced 
support for GAUSSIAN file formats and increased speed and  robustness 
in the configuration interation (CI),  geometry  optimization and SCF 
convergence sections.  Also,  AMPAC includes  the  SAM1 semiempirical 
method, which explicitly treats d-orbitals.  Current  parameter  sets 
for SAM1 include the transition metals Cu and Fe.  Ni, Ti, and Zn are 
slated for release in the near future.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                    DR. ANDREW HOLDER
                         President
 
Semichem, Inc.            ||  Internet Addr: aholder@cctr.umkc.edu
7128 Summit               ||  Phone Number:  (913) 268-3271
Shawnee, KS,  66216       ||  FAX Number:    (913) 268-3445
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 

--part_AD75D67B000223BD00000001--


From sunger@A.crl.com  Wed Mar 20 19:17:40 1996
Received: from A.crl.com  for sunger@A.crl.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id SAA27503; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 18:35:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [168.75.101.10] (A105012.sfo5.as.crl.com) by A.crl.com with SMTP id AA04859
  (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>); Wed, 20 Mar 1996 15:34:02 -0800
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 15:34:02 -0800
Message-Id: <v01530502ad75d4302d78@[168.75.101.10]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: sunger@a.crl.com (Stefan Unger)
Subject: Online Resource for Commercial Life Sciences Software


3/20/96
BIO ONLINE OFFERS COMMERCIAL LIFE SCIENCE SOFTWARE THROUGH WORLD WIDE WEB

Bio Online, a very popular web site dedicated to the biopharmaceutical
industry (http://www.bio.com), has added an extensive, growing and
convenient collection of life sciences-related software for sale in the Bio
Online Marketplace Store. Software is available from a wide range of
disciplines: biology, molecular biology, genetics, medicine, environmental
science, chemistry (organic, theoretical, analytical), molecular modeling
and design (computational and QSAR), productivity (structure drawing,
graphing, databases, research organizers, planners), and statistics, as
well as some relevant business modeling and planning software. Software
ranges from low cost educational software up to full featured research
software for PC, MAC and UNIX.

Orders can be accepted directly online using Visa/MasterCard with secure
(encrypted) or non-secure server technology, or by conventional methods
such as fax, phone or e-mail.

Bio Online, boasting over 200,000 page accesses per week, features
extensive industry information sources (several are unique to the site, as
well as a comprehensive Career Center). There are up-to-date news and
events sections, corporate biotech directories, press releases, and product
information, as well as hot-links to other Internet research, education and
government sites. The site is sponsored by KPMG Peat Marwick, Heller Ehrman
White & McAuliffe and Corning Pharmaceutical Services. Technical software
is made available through a collaborative effort with BioSoftware
Marketing.

@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#
Stefan Unger, Ph.D.
President
BioSoftware Marketing
4151 Middlefield Rd., Ste 109
Palo Alto, CA 94303-4743
sunger@a.crl.com

BioSoftware Marketing specializes in a full range of marketing services
(market studies to collateral design and production) for start-up and small
technical software companies, especially biopharm related.  E-mail your
full mailing address to receive a full-color brochure describing these
services.  We also offer consulting on computer aided drug design and
biological/chemical databases.

Product Manager, Scientific Software, Bio Online Store (www.bio.com)
@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#@@#



From smori@utsc.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  Wed Mar 20 20:17:41 1996
Received: from utsc.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  for smori@utsc.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id TAA28282; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 19:56:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: by utsc.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (5.67+1.6W/TISN-1.3/R2)
	id AA07724; Thu, 21 Mar 96 09:55:17 JST
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 09:55:17 JST
From: Seiji Mori <smori@utsc.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <9603210055.AA07724@utsc.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject:  MacGridzo program


Dear netters,

 I am looking for MacGridzo program when I am reading Gronert, et al. JOC,
1995, 60, 6731.
It is contour generation program for Macintosh (?), Rockware Inc. Wheat
Ridge, CO. 
In this program, which are QM calculation packages avalable other than
PROAIM program?
Where can I get this information from? (WWW, email)

 Seiji Mori
##############################################################
   Seiji Mori
  Graduate student in Nakamura Laboratory
  (Lab. of Physical Organic Chemistry)
 Department of Chemistry
 The University of Tokyo
 Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyou-ku, Tokyo 113,
  JAPAN.
 email:smori@utsc.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
---
Now my homepage is under construction.
http://www.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/personal/nakamuralab/smori.html
##############################################################

From Bernd.Hartke@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE Tue Mar 19 04:30 EST 1996
Received: from artemis.rus.uni-stuttgart.de  for Bernd.Hartke@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id EAA24566; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 04:30:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from servus02.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (servus02-fd.rus.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.18.202]) by artemis.rus.uni-stuttgart.de with SMTP id KAA09219
  (8.6.12/IDA-1.6 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>); Tue, 19 Mar 1996 10:30:14 +0100
Received: from servus07.rus.uni-stuttgart.de by servus02.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/SERVus-1.2)
          id AA43804; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 10:30:14 +0100
Received: by servus07.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA23465; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 10:30:13 +0100
From: <Bernd.Hartke@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>
Message-Id: <9603190930.AA23465@servus07.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: pronunciation of conformer
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 10:30:12 +0100 (MEZ)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 2852
Status: R



Hello Fellow-CCL-ers,

   I feel the urge to add my $0.02 to the discussion on the pronunciation
of "conformer". Let me emphasize from the outset that I am German; English
was my second foreign language in school (after starting out with Latin and 
before continuing with ancient Greek - unfortunately, I do not remember much
of my Latin and Greek, but it still helps me sometimes...). 

So far, it seems to me that all of you have missed one vital point:

It is obviously correct that "conFORmer" (with or without capital "m") is
the everyday ( = non-chemical) pronunciation of "conformer" as someone who
conforms. In this sense, "conformer" is formed from its root "conform" (from
con-formare in Latin, as correctly pointed out already -- note that the
"m" belongs to the root!) in one of several possible ways to form nouns in
English, namely by adding the suffix "-er" (as in "think" -> "thinker" or
"wait" -> "waiter" etc.; we have almost the same mechanism in German).

BUT: For the chemical meaning of "conformer" this analysis is not valid!
As the analogy to "isomer" (and to all the other "-mer"'s in chemistry, like
"monomer", "polymer", etc.) shows, the suffix "-mer" clearly is an entity
with its own meaning since "iso-" (like "mono-", "poly-", etc.) merely is a 
simple prefix. The meaning of "-mer" can be found in English dictionaries
that give some etymological background; for example, my "Collins Concise
Dictionary" (English-English, not English-German) tells me this:
   "-mer": suffix forming nouns. <Chem> denoting a substance of a particular
           class: monomer, polymer (from Greek: "meros" = part)

Obviously, in forming the _chemical_ "conformer" from "con-form-" and "-mer"
it is convenient (and commonplace) to drop one of the "m"'s, although this
obscures the true origin and leads to confusion with the above analysis of
"con-form-er" (someone who conforms).

So much for the etymology. Since I am neither a native English speaker nor
an expert in English but merely a German theoretical chemist who happens to 
know some English, you native English speakers have to settle the question
of where to put the stress in "conformer" for yourself.

Incidentally, in German we would say "konFORmer" for someone who conforms --
if we had such a word. But all German chemists say "/con/-for-MER" (secondary
stress on first syllable, primary stress on the last; or "MOnoMER" with about
equal stress on the first and last syllables). I guess this clever way out
is not open for English chemists...

Bernd

-- 
Dr. Bernd Hartke                  e-mail: bernd.hartke@rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Dep. of Theoretical Chemistry     http://www.theochem.uni-stuttgart.de/~hartke
University of Stuttgart           
Pfaffenwaldring 55                Phone: +49-711-685-4409
70569 Stuttgart                   FAX:   +49-711-685-4442
GERMANY


From polowin@hyper.hyper.com Tue Mar 19 11:50 EST 1996
Received: from www.hyper.com  for polowin@hyper.hyper.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id LAA01669; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:50:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hyper.hyper.com (hyper.hyper.com [204.50.97.9]) by www.hyper.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA15631 for <@www.hyper.com:CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 12:07:29 -0500
Received: by hyper.hyper.com (920330.SGI/920502.SGI)
	for @www.hyper.com:CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net id AA22153; Tue, 19 Mar 96 12:07:18 -0500
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 12:07:18 -0500
From: polowin@hyper.hyper.com (Joel Polowin)
Message-Id: <9603191707.AA22153@hyper.hyper.com>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: HyperChem Lite demo at ACS
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 880
Status: R


I'd like to jump on the promotional bandwagon and extend a brief invitation 
to those of you who will be attending the ACS conference in New Orleans 
to stop by the Hypercube booth, #929, in the exhibitors' area.  We'll be 
showing off our new "HyperChem Lite" software package (and our new display 
booth).  People who place orders at the show will receive their choice of a 
free HyperChem T-shirt or golf shirt.  We'll have information and demo disks 
for HyperChem Lite at the show, and of course we can mail them on request.

Joel

------------
Joel Polowin, Ph.D.   Manager, Scientific Support
Email to: polowin@hyper.com 

Hypercube Inc, 419 Phillip St, Waterloo, Ont, Canada N2L 3X2 (519)725-4040
Info requests to: info@hyper.com    Support questions to: support@hyper.com
Email group: Send "subscribe hyperchem" to hyperchem-request@hyper.com
WWW: http://www.hyper.com/



From topper@cooper.edu Wed Mar 20 16:09 EST 1996
Received: from magnum.cooper.edu  for topper@cooper.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id QAA25660; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:09:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zeus.cooper.edu by magnum.cooper.edu with SMTP id AA09598
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>); Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:09:32 -0500
Received: by zeus.cooper.edu id AA29564
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5); Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:05:06 -0500
From: TOPPER ROBERT <topper@cooper.edu>
Message-Id: <199603202105.AA29564@zeus.cooper.edu>
Subject: WWW Molecular Monte Carlo Page
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:05:05 -0500 (EST)
Cc: topper@cooper.edu, freeman@mozart.chm.uri.edu, truhlar@t1.chem.umn.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha3]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 2157
Status: R


Dear colleagues,

On the eve of the ACS meeting, which will feature a special
session on Monte Carlo methods in the COMP division,
we wish to announce the opening of a new
World-Wide-Web resource for information on Monte Carlo
simulations, random walks, and their applications 
in molecular modeling. 

In the Molecular Monte Carlo home page, we plan to highlight 
the research efforts of those who have provided descriptions of
their research programs on the web by providing links to their 
sites. This will help to improve communication between the various
groups who are using these methods. We also provide pointers
to sites containing useful numerical tools for 
practitioners of stochastic methods, like random 
number generators, etc.. Finally, in the near future we 
hope to establish a series of hypertext tutorials on various 
stochastic methods, such as the Metropolis algorithm, 
brownian dynamics, GLE dynamics and other, related methods. 

Submissions to the page (including tutorials and graphics!) and comments
for additions and improvements may be directed to 
topper@cooper.edu. We hope that this will be
a useful resource for beginners as well as for experts in the
field. The address of the page is

http://www.cooper.edu/engineering/chemechem/monte.html

Best regards to all,
Robert Topper

************************************************************************
Robert Q. Topper                       email:   topper@cooper.edu
Department of Chemistry                phone:   (212) 353-4378
The Cooper Union                       FAX:     (212) 353-4341 
51 Astor Place                         subway:  take the 6 to Astor Place 
New York, NY 10003 USA                          or the N/R to 8th St/NYU
http://www.cooper.edu/engineering/chemechem/depts_info/topper.html
************************************************************************
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, founded in 
1859, is a private institution of higher learning where all students
receive full-tuition scholarships to study engineering, architecture and art. 
************************************************************************


From tropsha@gibbs.oit.unc.edu  Wed Mar 20 22:17:43 1996
Received: from gibbs.oit.unc.edu  for tropsha@gibbs.oit.unc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id VAA00268; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:58:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by gibbs.oit.unc.edu (8.6.4.3/10.1)
	id VAA25559; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:57:18 -0500
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:57:17 -0500
From: Alex Tropsha <tropsha@gibbs.oit.unc.edu>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Call for Papers
Message-ID: <Pine.CVX.3.91.960320214218.22935D-100000@gibbs.oit.unc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Call for Papers

212th National American Chemical Society Meeting
COMP Division
August 25-30, 1996, Orlando, Florida

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS AND FREE ENERGY PERTURBATION METHODS

Abstracts Due April 15, 1996

A symposium entitled "Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Pertubation
Methods" will be held at the ACS Meeting in Orlando, Florida, during
August 25-30, 1996. The Symposium will include three tracks: Forcefield
Development for MD Simulations; Large-Scale Molecular Dynamics
Simulations; Free Energy Simulations: Methods and Applications. A partial
list of confirmed speakers includes: B. Brooks (NIH), C. Brooks (Scripps),
V. Daggett (UW-Seattle), T. Darden (NIEHS-RTP), J. Hermans (UNC-Chapel
Hill), P. Kollman (UCSF), K. Schulten (UI-Urbana), B. Tidor (MIT), D. 
York (Duke).  We are inviting both oral and poster presentations. 


Please submit Abstracts by April 15 to:
Alexander Tropsha, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor, Director
the Laboratory for Molecular Modeling
CB # 7360, Beard Hall
School of Pharmacy
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7360
Tel. (919) 966-2955
Fax  (919) 966-6919
e-mail: tropsha@gibbs.oit.unc.edu

Obtain Abstract Forms from ACS:
by calling 1-800-227-5558 (press 9-4-0) 
by writing to:
American Chemical Society
1155 Sixteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20036
via the World-Wide Web: 
http://www.acs.org/memgen/meetings/abinfo.htm


