From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Wed Mar 27 03:19:00 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id DAA29637; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 03:04:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr  for hebant@ext.jussieu.fr
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id DAA10876; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 03:04:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from idf.ext.jussieu.fr (idf.ext.jussieu.fr [134.157.81.129])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.7.3/jtpda-5.2) with ESMTP id JAA14974
          ; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 09:04:16 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [134.157.11.16] by idf.ext.jussieu.fr
	  (8.6.10/jtpda-4.0) with SMTP; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 09:04:12 +0100
X-Sender: hebant@idf.ext.jussieu.fr
Message-Id: <v01540b00ad7ea65220a3@[134.157.11.16]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 09:03:41 +0100
To: Carlos.Andre@bbs.centroin.com.br (Carlos Andre)
From: hebant@ext.jussieu.fr (Pascal HEBANT)
Subject: Re: CCL:chemistry-request@ccl.net
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net


Voce tem que visitar o endereco WWW seguinte : http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
Precisa tambem de falar ingles, o brasiliero nao e uma lingua que todo o
mundo entende...

Pascal




*****************************************************************************

Pascal HEBANT

Laboratoire d'Electrochimie et de Chimie Analytique
Ecole Nationale Superieure de Chimie de Paris
11 rue Pierre et Marie Curie
75005 Paris FRANCE

tel: 33 (1) 44 27 66 94                             fax: 33 (1) 44 27 67 50

http://alcyone.enscp.jussieu.fr/Pages/LECA/Electrochimie.html
*****************************************************************************





From mas@qc.ag-berlin.mpg.de  Wed Mar 27 06:19:05 1996
Received: from enterprise.qc.ag-berlin.mpg.de  for mas@qc.ag-berlin.mpg.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id FAA01326; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 05:41:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: by enterprise.qc.ag-berlin.mpg.de (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA14759; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 11:41:08 +0100
From: mas@qc.ag-berlin.mpg.de (Marek Sierka)
Message-Id: <9603271041.AA14759@enterprise.qc.ag-berlin.mpg.de>
Subject: Help: Semiempirical Periodic Calculations
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 11:41:06 +0100 (NFT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Dear netters,

        I am looking for a program that can perform  semiempirical
calculations  (MNDO, AM1) on peridic crystal structures. I've heard
about one, namely MOSOL, written by J.P Stewart, but I'm wondering
how does it work and I would like to know its capabilities before
I consider to order it from QCPI. If anybody used it, please e-mail me.
I will send the summary to the net.


Thanks in advance,

-- 

Marek Sierka                        
e-mail: mas@gea.qc.ag-berlin.mpg.de


From Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be  Wed Mar 27 07:19:04 1996
Received: from mserv.rug.ac.be  for Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id HAA02343; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 07:18:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from allserv.rug.ac.be by mserv.rug.ac.be with SMTP id AA27521
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>); Wed, 27 Mar 1996 13:18:48 +0100
Received: from hartree1.rug.ac.be by allserv.rug.ac.be (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA13556; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 13:18:42 +0100
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 13:15:24 +0100 (NFT)
From: Patrick Bultinck <Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be>
To: CCL <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: 2:electrostatics and dipole moment
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.960327125821.12214A-100000@hartree1.rug.ac.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Dear,

There seems to be some mis-understanding. I know that the VALUE for the 
dipole moment is indeed origin-independant for a neutral species, and not 
so for a charged species.
What I mean is : 'How to chose an origin for a neutral species IF you 
need not only the value ?'.
I will give an example :

Say C3v NH3 and C2v H2O. 
a) Complexes of the first with e.g. Na+ gives a larger interaction energy 
than with H2O.
b) mu H2O > mu NH3

In an article (I will not give the reference, since I would not like to 
let it look like I think something negative on some author, which no 
doubt knows more about this than I do) I found an explanation which 
should go as follows :

We know that mu H2O > mu NH3, so also that Z*mu is larger for the H2O 
complex than for the NH3 complex.
On the other hand, the interaction also depends on r, the distance 
between the dipole moment and the point charge or ion. The author found 
that the dipole vector in NH3 lies more to the right than in H2O (see 
figure).

	H		H
	 \		 \
        H-N		  O
	 /		 /
	H		H
           *->		*->	(PURELY QUALITATIVE AND EXAGERATED, please...)

For the interaction with an ion, r(NH3) would be substantially smaller 
than in case of H2O, which SHOULD explain the observed electrostatic 
interaction differences. BUT, I did some calculations myself, and the 
trouble is that I have great suspicions that the origin was simply put in 
the center of mass, which seems to me as an unjustifiable approach...I 
would put the origin where other multipoles are minimal. It seems to me 
that you could even play a little with the results, say you let all the 
chemical properties the same, but play a little with isotopes, and get 
another result, which should influence you perception of the 
metal-ligand bond.

So the question was : 'If I really need to have a method not only to have 
the value of the dipole moment, but also it's spacial position (origin, 
we have all components from our wavefunction, aka the value of the 
x-xomponent, y etc.), how  should I do this'.

Thanks,


*******************************************************************************
Patrick Bultinck			Macrocycles Quantum Chemical
Ph. D. Student				Calculations
Dept. Inorganic & Physical Chemistry 
University of Ghent			Tel. Int'l code/32/9/264.44.44
Krijgslaan 281 (S-3)			Fax. Int'l code/32/9/264.49.83
9000 Gent				E-mail : Patrick.Bultinck@rug.ac.be
Belgium					http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~pbultink/
*******************************************************************************


From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Wed Mar 27 09:19:04 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id IAA04486; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 08:48:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smaug.physics.mun.ca  for uli@smaug.physics.mun.ca
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id IAA12786; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 08:48:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: by smaug.physics.mun.ca (940816.SGI.8.6.9/911001.SGI)
	 id KAA08416; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 10:19:19 -0330
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 10:19:19 -0330 (NST)
From: Uli Salzner <uli@smaug.physics.mun.ca>
To: ccl <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: meaning of eigenvalues in dft
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960327100114.8242A-100000@smaug.physics.mun.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




recently I posted a question concerning the meaning of eigenvalues in 
density functional theory. I received many very helpful references. 
Thanks to everybody who took the time to answer. Here is the original 
question and a summary of the answers:



Callaway and March (Sol. State Phys. 38, 135 (1984)) discuss the meaning 
or better "non-meaning" of eigenvalues in density functional methods. It 
seems that the band gap of a sufficiently large system can be calculated 
by taking the energy difference between the valence and the conduction 
band but that the difference between HOMO and LUMO in molecules can not 
be used in connection with Koopman's theorem. I am wondering whether this 
is the end of the story or whether it is possible for practical purposes 
to use HOMO and LUMO levels. Would that be a crude approximation or total 
garbage? 

I am especially interested in density functional methods as implemnented in 
GAUSSIAN 94, which lists the HOMO and LUMO levels in DFT just as for HF. It 
is quite tempting to use them and as far as I tried the results seem to be 
reasonable. What I would like to do is to compare solid state calculations 
(with Cerius2) and calculations for oligomers of increasing size and try to 
extrapolate towards the solid. I am only interested in systems at 0 
temperature where the occupation of the one-electron functions is either 
0 or 1.

I would be very thankful for any comments or related references. A 
summary of the answers will be posted.

*****************************************************************************


Dear Uli Salzner,

a good functional would give perfect ionization potential (IP). See Baerends et
al. I.J.Q.C. 52 (1994) 711 and Krieger et al. DFT ed. E.K.U. Gross and R.M.
Dreizler (1995) p 191, Plenum Press N.Y.

The bad IP shows the deficiencies of the funtionals. I've read a paper in which
the authors shifted simply the eigenvalues (e.g. subtracted 3 eV from the upper
eigenvalues), and got good agreement with the experiment (UPS). (?!)

I think some progress is expected in this field in the near future (may be on
the ICTCP II).


-- 

 Gabor I. Csonka	   e-mail: csonka@incm.u-nancy.fr
 Lab.Chimie Theorique      Universite Henri Poincare
 B.P. 239                  54506 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy FRANCE
 tel: +33-83.91.25.29      fax: +33-83.91.25.30


******************************************************************************


 i think that the work of Levy, and others 
actually shows that for the EXACT density,
and exchange-correlation functional the KS
orbital-energies will be -IP..... but of course any
approximation to these may not have any meaning.


Dr. Noj Malcolm
Noj.Malcolm@man.ac.uk


******************************************************************************

> Callaway and March (Sol. State Phys. 38, 135 (1984)) discuss the meaning 
> or better "non-meaning" of eigenvalues in density functional methods. It 
> seems that the band gap of a sufficiently large system can be calculated 
> by taking the energy difference between the valence and the conduction 
> band but that the difference between HOMO and LUMO in molecules can not 
> be used in connection with Koopman's theorem. I am wondering whether this 
> is the end of the story or whether it is possible for practical purposes 
> to use HOMO and LUMO levels. Would that be a crude approximation or total 
> garbage? 

The question of how to compute excitation energies with DFT is not solved,
but useful discussions can be found, by people like Kohn, Theophilou (difficult
to read), Gross and Nagy. The idea of the Slater transition state is important
in this discussion.

A recent paper dealing with the subject is

Mel Levy, Excitation energies from density-functional orbital energies,
Physical Review A, Vol. 52, No. 6 (December 1995), pp. R4313-R4315.

The classical paper is

E. K. U. Gross, L. N. Oliveira and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. A 37, 2805 (1988),

and two other papers in the same journal (following this one). Also have
a look at

Agnes Nagy, Exact ensemble exchange potentials for multiplets,
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Suppl. 29 (1995), pp. 297-301.

Hope this helps... Best regards,

Alain

--
Alain Kessi (alain.kessi@psi.ch)
at Paul Scherrer Institut, Zuerich, Switzerland


*****************************************************************************

   Kohn-Sham eigenvalues do have meaning, but not the same as in HF. 
Moreover the full meaning of KS eigenvalue is not yet clear, but new 
discoveries are made. In particular, there is numerical evidence 
that certain differences of eigenvalues (orbital energies) are related
to the average of true singlet/triplet excitation energies in atoms,
provided that the exact V_xc potential is used  (work of A. Savin and
co-workers presented at the 1996 APS meeting).
    Here are some references about the meaning(s) of Kohn-Sham
eigenvalues:


1. Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules, by Parr and
   Yang, section 7-6 (Oxford Press, 1990) : an overview.

2. Slater, "The SCF field for Molecules and Solids: Quantum Theory
   of Molecules and Solids", vol. 4, New York (McGraw Hill, 1974);
   based on semi-empirical X-alpha and thus a little out of the
   spirit of "modern" DFT, but still an excellent reference, with
   lucid description of the physics.

3. Slater, Adv. Quantum Chem. 6 (1972) 1 : describes
   "Slater's transition state (STS) method", where eigenvalues out of
   SCF calculations for configurations with non-integer occupation are
   used to approximate total energy differences.  (might be a practical
   way of getting better estimates of true HOMO-LUMO excitation energies
   than straight orbital energy differences).

4. Williams et al.. J. Chem. Phys. 63 (1975) 628: a generalization
   and refinement of the STS method.

5. Janak, Phys. Rev. B 18 (1978) 7165: shows that eigenvalues
   eps_i are equal to partial derivatives of the total energy
   w.r.t. the occupation numbers for any XC functional (including
   of course the unknown exact XC):
     eps_i = del(E) / del(n_i)

6. Perdew and Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 23 (1981) 5048: discusses a serious
   shortcoming of the LDA and a remedy, the Self-Interaction Correction
   (SIC).  In a scheme with SIC, the KS eigenvalues obtained are typically
   much closer to ionization potentials and electron affinities than in
   a LDA scheme.  Following the PZ 1981 paper, there is a number of
   SIC papers showing this, search for authors Harrison and Whitehead.

7. Perdew and Levy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1884 : the title
   is "Physical content of the exact KS orbital energies: band
   gaps and derivative discontinuities."

8. Fritsche et al. has suggested a simple correction to orbital energy
   differences to get better estimates of excitation energies in
   solids but it is not clear if that "works" for small molecules.
   see L. Fritsche Physica B 172 (1991) 7 and possibly more recent
   papers by the same author.

9. In another context, Malkin et al. (J. Am. Chem. Soc.
   116 (1994) 5898) proposed an equally simple, but very different,
   correction to orbital energy differences.  Although they intended
   this correction to improve sum-over-states (SOS) expressions, it
   could be tried as improvement to the HOMO-LUMO energy difference.


   Related to this:

   The total energy can be written as a sum of eigenvalues (those
of occupied orbitals) plus "other terms".   These other terms have
some qualitative meaning, therefore the sum of eigenvalues also
has qualitative meaning, see
10. Gopinathan and Whitehead, Israel J. Chem. 19 (1980) 209
11. J. Harris, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 13 (1979) 189.


   There are more references, including some very recent work.
I guess there is a lot more meaning to the KS eigenvalues than was
believed some years ago and that there is still important things
to be discovered, both on formal and numerical grounds.

   For your particular problem, many empirical schemes could be
tried:  straight orbital energy difference, STS, maybe some kind of
empirical SIC (the correct SIC scheme is fairly complicated and
compute-intensive), Fritsche's or Malkin's corrections.


    Regards,
               Rene Fournier     fournier@physics.unlv.edu


****************************************************************************

    Dear Dr. Salzner;

    Dr. Levy of Tulane Univ. just presented a talk at the APS meeting
on precisely the meaning of HOMO-LUMO Kohn-Sham orbital energy differences,
and its relationship to the true excitation energy under certain assumptions.
Unfortunately my scribbled notes are grossly incomplete, but here is a
reference that you may want to check to learn about that:

AUTHOR(s):       Levy, Mel 
TITLE(s):        Excitation energies from density-functional orbital
                   energies.                                                  

           In:   Physical review.  A,  Atomic, molecular, and opt 
                 DEC 01 1995 v 52 n 6 
         Page:   R4313 


   Regards,
               Rene Fournier     fournier@physics.unlv.edu




From mbdtsnm@hpf.ch.man.ac.uk  Wed Mar 27 10:19:05 1996
Received: from nessie.mcc.ac.uk  for mbdtsnm@hpf.ch.man.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id JAA05399; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 09:56:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hpf.ch.man.ac.uk (actually mchhpf.ch.man.ac.uk) 
          by nessie.mcc.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Wed, 27 Mar 1996 14:55:33 +0000
From: Nathaniel (noj) Malcolm <mbdtsnm@hpf.ch.man.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <6866.9603271453@hpf.ch.man.ac.uk>
Subject: cas freqs
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 96 14:53:22 GMT
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


 has anyone got experience of running
CAS frequencies in g94, using basis sets that INCLUDE
f-functions?

 I have been trying to run a 2 in 2 cas
on f2 using the cc-pvtz basis, only 60 basis functions,
this results in an error message :

                             -------------------
                             The (ff|fd) Classes
 Not enough memory for any path:
 MxKBra=    1 MxKKet=    1 Memory=     1693664.
 After MaxDer, Avail=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
 After MemPth, Avail=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
 After MxKxxx, Avail=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
 No path selected in FillAv.

 this was run on an hp-755 with 100Mb of memory
but the same error occurs when run with 200Mb
(on another machine).....
if i can avoid using numerical frequencies it
would be nice....

thanks in advance
Dr. Noj Malcolm
Noj.Malcolm@man.ac.uk


From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Wed Mar 27 12:19:06 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id LAA08271; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 11:48:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rccw21.rti.org  for balbes@osiris.rti.org
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id LAA17963; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 11:48:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from osiris.rti.org by RCCW21.RTI.ORG (PMDF V5.0-5 #11231)
 id <01I2TYXEH56O00Q8G1@RCCW21.RTI.ORG> for chemistry@ccl.net; Wed,
 27 Mar 1996 11:48:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [199.3.12.190] by osiris.rti.org via SMTP
 (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO) for @rccw21.rti.org:chemistry@ccl.net id AA22861;
 Wed, 27 Mar 1996 11:37:40 -0500
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 11:39:49 -0500 (EST)
From: "Lisa M. Balbes" <balbes@osiris.rti.org>
Subject: Chemical Database Programs?
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <balbes.1178332429J@osiris.rti.org>
X-Mailer: VersaTerm Link v1.1.6
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


I have a friend who was using Unison (Tripos) to maintain a database of
chemical structures with a Microsoft Access database.  Unfortunately, that
program has been discontinued, so she's looking for a replacement.

Requirements are:
IBM-PC compatible program, that will link through a macro to an existing MS
Access database.  They want to be able to do 2D and substructure searches,
3D would be nice but is not necessary.  Compounds are industrial chemical
(surfacants, lubricants), not large proteins.  

Any suggestions can be sent to me, balbes@osiris.rti.org, and I'll send a
summary to her (as well as back to the list if there's interest).

Thanks to all in advance,

Lisa

*** We don't care, we have each other, on the Internet.  (Dave Barry) ***
Lisa M. Balbes, Ph.D.                Scientific Software Consulting 
 Osiris Consultants             (usability testing and technical writing)
balbes@osiris.rti.org                 http://www.cris.com/~balbes


From waite@cyclades.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr  Wed Mar 27 16:19:09 1996
Received: from epmhs.gr  for waite@cyclades.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id PAA11124; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 15:52:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from isosun.ariadne-t.gr by epmhs.gr with SMTP id AA02155
  (5.67a8/IDA-1.5 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>); Wed, 27 Mar 1996 22:34:18 +0200
Received: from cyclades (cyclades.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr) by isosun.ariadne-t.gr (4.1/SMI-4.0-MHS-6.0)
	id AA09853; Wed, 27 Mar 96 21:45:48 +0200
X-Ncc-Regid: gr.ariadnet
Received: from localhost by cyclades (8.6.4/10.1)
	id WAA19508; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 22:52:33 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 22:52:33 +0200
From: WAITE JOHN ( E.I.E ) <waite@cyclades.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr>
Message-Id: <199603272052.WAA19508@cyclades>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: East Europe CCL indexes summaries available
X-Charset: ELOT_928
X-Char-Esc: 29


   Dear Netters,
   With Dr. Jan Labanowski's kind permission I announce the availability of
 the Computational Chemistry List's indexes summaries, mainly for use in
 Eastern Europe, from the FTP anonymous account at 143.233.245.4.
 cd pub/ccl
   In addition to index.YY, this contains README and help files. However
 the full indexes must still be obtained from OSC and NO search facilities
 are available in Athens.



 Dr. John Waite,                            e-mail:  chem8@york.ac.uk   or
 The National Hellenic Research Foundation,   waite@cyclades.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr
 Organic and Pharaceutical Institute,       phone: ++30-1-7238958 (direct)
 Vas. Konstantinou 48,                      phone: ++30-1-7247913(secrtry. Mary)
 Athens 116-35,                             fax:   ++30-1-7247913
 Greece
                                       or
 NCRS "Democritos",                         phone: ++30-1-6513112-5 X219
 c/o Dr. G.Kordas,                          e-mail john@john.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr 
 Material Science Institute,
 Aghia Paraskevi,
 Attikis,
 Athens 153-10,
 Greece

From d3g359@fido.pnl.gov  Wed Mar 27 18:19:07 1996
Received: from pnl.gov  for d3g359@fido.pnl.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id SAA12041; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 18:09:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fido.pnl.gov by pnl.gov (PMDF V4.3-13 #6012)
 id <01I2U5Y53JA891W4I8@pnl.gov>; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 15:09:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fido.pnl.gov (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
 for @relay.pnl.gov:CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net id AA06965; Wed,
 27 Mar 96 15:06:31 -0800
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 15:06:31 -0800
From: d3g359@fido.pnl.gov (John Nicholas)
Subject: solid state QM codes
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Message-id: <9603272306.AA06965@fido.pnl.gov>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Hi, I'm interested in finding all quantum mechanical codes
that can treat solid state (periodic systems). I'm familiar
with crystal, embed, dsol. Please respond to me personally
and if possible list any experiencs/impressions you have
about the code, such as speed, ease-of-use, accuracy, etc.
I will summarize for the list.

Thanks, John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  John Nicholas                                 Office: (509) 375-6559
  Senior Research Scientist                        FAX: (509) 375-6631
  Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory     
  Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  Mailstop K1-96
  Richland, WA 99352
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


>From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Mar 26 07:35 EST 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id HAA14895; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 07:35:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from volta  for aiba@ir.phys.chem.ethz.ch
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id HAA21570; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 07:35:07 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 13:34:58 +0200
Message-Id: <96032613345810@ir.phys.chem.ethz.ch>
From: aiba@ir.phys.chem.ethz.ch (Ayaz Bakasov, Phys. Chem., ETH Zuerich (Zentrum))
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: small CHIRAL molecules - examples
X-VMS-To: smtp%"chemistry@ccl.net"
X-VMS-Cc: AIBA
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1255
Status: RO


Dear fellow CCLers,

just wanted to address your knowledge
of small CHIRAL (no plane of symmetry
or center of inversion) molecules.
Trust you should know a lot!

My knowledge of examples of small
CHIRAL molecules is quite limited
(I'm a theor. physicist):
I am aware of H_2 O_2, S_2 H_2,
N_2 O_4, some twisted geometries of
hydrocarbons like C_2 H_2, C_2 H_4, C_2 H_6, 
etc. only.

I wondered if you might have given
more examples of such molecules,
I am pretty sure there are lots of them.

Desired stuff is that a molecule
is not only CHIRAL (or has CHIRAL geometry in
some of electronic states)
but also that it is relatively stable,
has volatile phase (i.e. it is in principle
suitable for spectroscopy). I look
for small molecules - then ab initio calculations 
on them are, in principle, more reliable.
Lastly, references (fresh ones to trace work back)
on the molecule-example would be most welcome.

As I hope that the integral knowledge
of the CCL community on the subject is vast, 
I am prepared to post a comprehensive summary 
of your responses.

With kind regards,
Ayaz Bakasov.
----------------------
Lab. fuer Phys. Chemie
ETH-Zuerich (Zentrum)
CH-8092 Zuerich
Switzerland
----------------------
Phone: 0041-1-6327918
FAX:   0041-1-6321021


>From cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de Mon Mar 25 04:53 EST 1996
Received: from weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de  for cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id EAA27158; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 04:53:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA125237612; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 10:53:32 +0100
Message-Id: <199603250953.EAA27158@www.ccl.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 10:53:32 +0100
From: Christoph Heidelbach <cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Summary: MD parameters from ab initio calculations
Cc: cheidel@gwdg.de
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 26071
Status: RO


Dear CCL'ers,

many thanks to all those who answered me. My original question was:

I am searching for some information about the evaluation of force field 
parameters for molecular dynamics from ab initio or semiempirical calculations.
What I am looking for is how to fit atomic charges and Lennard-Jones-parameters.
Any answers will be greatly appreciated and I will summerize all replies.


This is what I got:

>From hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA Tue Feb 27 22:04 MEZ 1996
Received: from harfang.CC.UMontreal.CA by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de with ESMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA206815086; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 22:04:46 +0100
Return-Path: <hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA>
Received: from eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA [132.204.10.20]) by harfang.CC.UMontreal.CA with ESMTP id QAA13932
  (8.6.11/IDA-1.6 for <cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de>); Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:03:35 -0500
Received: from cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA by eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (950221.405.SGI.8.6.10/5.17)
	id QAA19296; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:03:34 -0500
Received: by cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA (950221.405.SGI.8.6.10/5.17)
	id QAA21209; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:03:34 -0500
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:03:34 -0500
Message-Id: <199602272103.QAA21209@cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA>
To: cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de
In-Reply-To: <199602271757.MAA10086@www.ccl.net> (message from Christoph Heidelbach on Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:57:05 +0100)
Subject: Re: CCL:MD parameters from ab initio
>From: hinsenk@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Konrad HINSEN)
Status: RO


   I am searching for some information about the evaluation of force field 
   parameters for molecular dynamics from ab initio or semiempirical calculations.
   What I am looking for is how to fit atomic charges and Lennard-Jones-parameters.

Ich schreiben gerade an einem Artikel ueber ein solches Projekt (ein
Potential fuer quantenmechanische Simulationen von Protonentransfer in
Acetylaceton), mit einer recht ausfuehrlichen Abhandlung ueber das
Fitten von Ladungen, da meine Methode sich von den ueblichen
unterscheidet. Ich kann gerne eine Kopie (auch elektronisch) schicken,
wenn alles fertig ist, d.h. voraussichtlich naechste Woche.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen                     | E-Mail: hinsenk@ere.umontreal.ca
Departement de chimie             | Tel.: +1-514-343-6111 ext. 3953
Universite de Montreal            | Fax:  +1-514-343-7586
C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-Ville     | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/Nederlands/
Montreal (QC) H3C 3J7             | Francais (phase experimentale)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>From eduffy@laplace.csb.yale.edu Tue Feb 27 22:22 MEZ 1996
Received: from laplace.csb.yale.edu by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de with SMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA208516124; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 22:22:04 +0100
Return-Path: <eduffy@laplace.csb.yale.edu>
Received: from kepler by laplace.csb.yale.edu (NX5.67d/NX3.0M)
	id AA01528; Tue, 27 Feb 96 16:21:57 -0500
>From: "Erin Duffy" <eduffy@laplace.csb.yale.edu>
Received: (from eduffy@localhost) by kepler.csb.yale.edu (8.7.4/8.7.3) id QAA20313 for cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:21:56 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199602272121.QAA20313@kepler.csb.yale.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:MD parameters from ab initio
To: cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de (Christoph Heidelbach)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:21:56 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <199602271757.MAA10086@www.ccl.net> from "Christoph Heidelbach" at Feb 27, 96 06:57:05 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: RO


Hi -  I'd suggest looking at some of Bill Jorgensen's
      papers - his group are experts in this area.  Here
      is a small sampling.  Please contact me if I can
      be of further assistance.  - Erin Duffy
                                 eduffy@franklin.csb.yale.edu

Jorgensen, W.L.; Madura, J.D.; Swenson, C.J.  "Optimized
Intermolecular Potential Functions for Liquid Hydrocarbons."
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, v.106, 6638-6646.

Jorgensen, W.L.; Tirado-Rives, J.  "The OPLS Potential Functions
for Proteins.  Energy Minimizations for Crystals of Cyclic
Peptides and Crambin."  J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, v.110, 1657-1666.

Jorgensen, W.L.; Gao, J.  "Cis-Trans Energy Difference for the
Peptide Bond in the Gas Phase and in Aqueous Solution."  J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1988, v.110, 4212.

Jorgensen, W.L.; Severance, D.L.  "Aromatic-Aromatic Interactions:
Free Energy Profiles for the Benzene Dimer in Water, Chloroform,
and Liquid Benzene."  J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, v.112, 4768-4774.

Duffy, E.M.; Severance, D.L.; Jorgensen, W.L.  "Urea:  Potential
Functions, logP, and Free Energy of Hydration."  Isr. J. Chem.,
1993, v.33, 323-330.

Carlson, H.A.; Nguyen, T.B.; Orozco, M.; Jorgensen, W.L.  "Accuracy
of Free Energies of Hydration for Organic Molecules from 6-31G(d)-
Derived Partial Charges."  J. Comput. Chem., 1993, v.14, 1240-1249.

>From v_uk@iris23.biosym.com Wed Feb 28 02:05 MEZ 1996
Received: from bioc1.biosym.com by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de with SMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA225539529; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 02:05:29 +0100
Return-Path: <v_uk@iris23.biosym.com>
Received: from iris23.biosym.com by bioc1.biosym.com (5.64/0.0)
	id AA21813; Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:09:46 -0800
Received: by iris23.biosym.com (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
	for cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de id RAA27793; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:05:16 -0800
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:05:16 -0800
>From: v_uk@biosym.com (Masahiko Katagari XPIRE 4-15-96 HOST John Newsam Tohoku University)
Message-Id: <199602280105.RAA27793@iris23.biosym.com>
To: cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de
Subject: MD parameters
Status: RO


Dear Dr. Christoph Heidelbach,

As for the parametrization, we (biosym/msi) parametrize the LJ and partial
charge using a nonlinear least-squares fit to the ab-initio data.
If you are interested in, please refer, e.g.

	J.Hill and J.Sauer,
	Molecular Mechanics Potential for Silica and Zeolite Catalysis
	Based on ab initio Calculations.
	1. Dens and Microporous Silica

	J. Phys. Chem. 98, 1238 (1994).

This method produces the potential which includes many body terms such as
distortion. The charges in the forcefield are directly taken from a population
analysis of the wavefunctions. The use of charges is somewhat artificial, since
potential has its origin in a Taylor series expansion which accounts for all
interactions. In this context, point charge interactions are not required,
but because of the necessity to describe interactions between atoms or groups
which are not directly connected by bonds, but which may come close to each
other simulations, they are introduced in potential, too.

Frankly speaking, we use the partial charge as a parameter to fit the
experimental data.

As for the repulsive van der Waals parameters, test particle method is
frequently used.

See for example,

	H. Bohm and R. Ahlrichs
	A Study of short-range repulsions.

	J. Chem. Phys., 77, 2028 (1982).

or

	H. Bohm, R. Ahlrichs, P. Scharf and H. Schiffer
	Intermolecular potentials for CH4, CH3F, CHF3, CH3Cl, CH2Cl2, CH3CN and CO2

	J. Chem. Phys., 81, 1389 (1984).


Best Regards,

Masa Katagiri

                                        
 __o__o_o__o __o    Masahiko Katagiri            __o__o_o__o __o
`\<,\<,<,\<,`\<,    v_uk@biosym.com             `\<,\<,<,\<,`\<,
O/ O/ O O/ OO/ O    TEL -1-619-546-5389(direct) O/ O/ O O/ OO/ O
                    FAX -1-619-458-0136
                    e_mail  v_uk@biosym.com
                                                                         
             MSI  9685 Scranton Road  San Diego, CA 92121


>From ross@cgl.ucsf.EDU Wed Feb 28 02:13 MEZ 1996
Received: from socrates.ucsf.EDU by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de with ESMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA225590020; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 02:13:40 +0100
Return-Path: <ross@cgl.ucsf.EDU>
Received: (from ross@localhost) by socrates.ucsf.EDU (8.7.3/GSC4.24)
	id RAA00603 for cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:13:37 -0800 (PST)
>From: ross@cgl.ucsf.EDU
Message-Id: <199602280113.RAA00603@socrates.ucsf.EDU>
To: cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de
Subject: Re:  CCL:MD parameters from ab initio
Status: RO

You might want to check out the force field sections
of the amber web pages at:

  http://www.amber.ucsf.edu/amber/

Bill Ross

>From hebant@ext.jussieu.fr Wed Feb 28 09:21 MEZ 1996
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de with ESMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA256975685; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:21:25 +0100
Return-Path: <hebant@ext.jussieu.fr>
Received: from idf.ext.jussieu.fr (idf.ext.jussieu.fr [134.157.81.129])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.7.3/jtpda-5.2) with ESMTP id JAA20491
          ; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:20:47 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [134.157.11.16] by idf.ext.jussieu.fr
	  (8.6.10/jtpda-4.0) with SMTP; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:20:43 +0100
X-Sender: hebant@idf.ext.jussieu.fr
Message-Id: <v01510100ad59bf7626fd@[134.157.11.16]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:19:25 +0100
To: Christoph Heidelbach <cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de>,
        chemistry@www.ccl.net
>From: hebant@ext.jussieu.fr (Pascal HEBANT)
Subject: Re: CCL:MD parameters from ab initio
Cc: cheidel@gwdg.de
Status: RO

At 18:57 27/02/96, Christoph Heidelbach wrote:
>Hallo everybody out there,
>
>I am searching for some information about the evaluation of force field
>parameters for molecular dynamics from ab initio or semiempirical calculations.
>What I am looking for is how to fit atomic charges and
>Lennard-Jones-parameters.
>Any answers will be greatly appreciated and I will summerize all replies.
>
>Best regards.
>
>Christoph
>


We have done something like that in our lab : we have computed pair
potential function of Born Huggins Mayer type with DMol calculations :
Point energies are performed for the 2 atoms involved in the potential with
fixed geometry. Then, a curve fitting (with Kaleidagraph) allowed us to
obtain the parameters.
See e.g.  Roullet, G., J. J. Legendre, et al. (1994). "Ab-initio and
molecular dynamics studies of molten NaCl Graphite interfaces." Molten Salt
Forum 1-2: 105-116.

Hope this helps you

Pascal



*****************************************************************************

Pascal HEBANT

Laboratoire d'Electrochimie et de Chimie Analytique
Ecole Nationale Superieure de Chimie de Paris
11 rue Pierre et Marie Curie
75005 Paris FRANCE

tel: 33 (1) 44 27 66 94                             fax: 33 (1) 44 27 67 50

http://alcyone.enscp.jussieu.fr/Pages/LECA/Electrochimie.html
*****************************************************************************





>From ferenc@rchsg8.chemie.uni-regensburg.de Wed Feb 28 09:50 MEZ 1996
Received: from comsun.rz.uni-regensburg.de by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de with SMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA262597400; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:50:00 +0100
Return-Path: <ferenc@rchsg8.chemie.uni-regensburg.de>
Received: from rchsg8.chemie.uni-regensburg.de by comsun.rz.uni-regensburg.de with SMTP id AA19403
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de>); Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:49:57 +0100
Received: by rchsg8.chemie.uni-regensburg.de (931110.SGI/URRZ-Sub-1.5-irix)
	(for cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de) id AA14032; Wed, 28 Feb 96 09:50:12 +0100
>From: "Ferenc Molnar" <ferenc@rchsg8.chemie.uni-regensburg.de>
Message-Id: <9602280950.ZM14030@rchsg8.chemie.uni-regensburg.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:50:11 +0100
In-Reply-To: Christoph Heidelbach <cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de>
        "CCL:MD parameters from ab initio" (Feb 27,  6:57pm)
References: <199602271757.MAA10086@www.ccl.net>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: Christoph Heidelbach <cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de>
Subject: Re: CCL:MD parameters from ab initio
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Status: RO

Hallo Chrisoph!

> What I am looking for is how to fit atomic charges and
> Lennard-Jones-parameters.
> Any answers will be greatly appreciated and I will summerize all replies.

Das wuerde mich auch sehr interessieren! Bitte schick mir doch
die Antworten, insbesondere Hinweise auf bestehende Programme!

Einige Referenzen kann ich dir geben:

1) N.L. Allinger and J.P. Bowen in Rev.Comp.Chem. 2, K.B. Lipkowitz
and D.B. Boyd (Eds.), VCH, 1991, ISBN 3-527-28338-2.

2) U. Dinur and A.T. Hagler (ebd.).

3) AUTHOR = {G. Chalasi\'nski and M.M. Szcze\'sniak},
TITLE = {Origins of Structure and Energetics of van der Waals
 JOURNAL =Chem. Rev.,
YEAR = {1994},
VOLUME = {94},
NUMBER = {7},
PAGES = {1723--1765},
KEYS = {van der Waals, ab initio, dispersion, correlation, PES},

4) AUTHOR = {J.R. Maple and M.-J. Hwang and T.P. Stockfisch and
          U. Dinur and M. Waldman and C.S. Ewig and A.T. Hagler},
TITLE = {Derivation of Class II Force Fields. I. Methodology and
         Quantum Force Field for the Alkyl Functional Group and
         Alkane Molecules},
JOURNAL =J. Comp. Chem.,
YEAR = {1994},
VOLUME = {15},
NUMBER = {2},
PAGES = {162--182},
KEYS = {derivatives, parameters, ab initio, PES, anharmonicity,
        intramolecular forces, cross terms, transferability, validity },
        Clusters from ab Initio Calculations},

5) AUTHOR = {D.E. Woon},
 TITLE = {Accurate modeling of intermolecular forces: a systematic
         M\o ller-Plesset study of the argon dimer using correlation
         consistent basis sets},
JOURNAL = Chem. Phys. Lett.,
YEAR = {1993},
VOLUME = {204},
NUMBER = {1,2},
PAGES = {29--35},
KEYS = { PES, MP4, augmented correlation consistent basis set, argon,
         supermolecule approach, BSSE, CP},

Ich habe auch schon einige Parametrisierungsversuche unternommen.
Allerdings geraet man sehr schnell an die Grenzen der ab initio
Prgramme (Gaussian, Gamess) oder der Optimierungsverfahren (zu
viele Parameter). Eine Parametrisierung kann selbst fuer kleine Systeme
sehr aufwendig werden!

Trotzdem: Have fun!

Ferenc




>From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net Wed Feb 28 10:07 MEZ 1996
Received: from www.ccl.net by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de with ESMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA263458467; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 10:07:47 +0100
Return-Path: <chemistry-request@www.ccl.net>
Received:  for chemistry-request@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id DAA20495; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 03:32:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr  for hebant@ext.jussieu.fr
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id DAA20463; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 03:21:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from idf.ext.jussieu.fr (idf.ext.jussieu.fr [134.157.81.129])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.7.3/jtpda-5.2) with ESMTP id JAA20491
          ; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:20:47 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [134.157.11.16] by idf.ext.jussieu.fr
	  (8.6.10/jtpda-4.0) with SMTP; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:20:43 +0100
X-Sender: hebant@idf.ext.jussieu.fr
Message-Id: <v01510100ad59bf7626fd@[134.157.11.16]>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:19:25 +0100
To: Christoph Heidelbach <cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de>,
        chemistry@www.ccl.net
>From: hebant@ext.jussieu.fr (Pascal HEBANT)
Subject: CCL:MD parameters from ab initio
Cc: cheidel@gwdg.de
Sender: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry-request@www.ccl.net>
Errors-To: ccl@www.ccl.net
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

At 18:57 27/02/96, Christoph Heidelbach wrote:
>Hallo everybody out there,
>
>I am searching for some information about the evaluation of force field
>parameters for molecular dynamics from ab initio or semiempirical calculations.
>What I am looking for is how to fit atomic charges and
>Lennard-Jones-parameters.
>Any answers will be greatly appreciated and I will summerize all replies.
>
>Best regards.
>
>Christoph
>


We have done something like that in our lab : we have computed pair
potential function of Born Huggins Mayer type with DMol calculations :
Point energies are performed for the 2 atoms involved in the potential with
fixed geometry. Then, a curve fitting (with Kaleidagraph) allowed us to
obtain the parameters.
See e.g.  Roullet, G., J. J. Legendre, et al. (1994). "Ab-initio and
molecular dynamics studies of molten NaCl Graphite interfaces." Molten Salt
Forum 1-2: 105-116.

Hope this helps you

Pascal



*****************************************************************************

Pascal HEBANT

Laboratoire d'Electrochimie et de Chimie Analytique
Ecole Nationale Superieure de Chimie de Paris
11 rue Pierre et Marie Curie
75005 Paris FRANCE

tel: 33 (1) 44 27 66 94                             fax: 33 (1) 44 27 67 50

http://alcyone.enscp.jussieu.fr/Pages/LECA/Electrochimie.html
*****************************************************************************





-------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
-- Original Sender Envelope Address: hebant@ext.jussieu.fr
-- Original Sender From: Address: hebant@ext.jussieu.fr
CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
             Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 


>From Darren.Andrews@man.ac.uk Wed Feb 28 11:34 MEZ 1996
Received: from nessie.mcc.ac.uk by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de with ESMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA273343675; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 11:34:35 +0100
Return-Path: <Darren.Andrews@man.ac.uk>
Received: from [130.88.12.235] (actually femt03.ch.man.ac.uk) 
          by nessie.mcc.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Wed, 28 Feb 1996 10:34:01 +0000
X-Sender: mbcdpa@nessie.mcc.ac.uk
Message-Id: <v01530500ad59df31cb90@[130.88.12.235]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 10:38:40 +0000
To: cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de
>From: Darren.Andrews@man.ac.uk (Darren Andrews)
Subject: Re: CCL:MD parameters from ab initio
Status: RO


A very basic way to do this would be to use the Mulliken or similar charges
>from the Ab Initio output and some empirical Lennard-Jones parameters e.g.,
Lorentz-Berthelot to get a pretty rough set of starting values.
If you use a distributed multipole analysis approach (see Anthony Stone
circa. '89) which can be calculated using CADPAC you can get a (very) good
approximation of the electrostatic part of the interaction.  If the system
you are looking at is dominated by electrostatic forces then the empirical
L-J parameters will be less important.



Darren Andrews.

University of Manchester,
Department of Chemistry,
Oxford road,
Manchester.
M13 9PL.

Darren.Andrews@man.ac.uk
PGP: 512/62A971A9

Tel: 0161 275  2000 ext.4699.
Fax: 0161 275 4598.



>From garciae@guarany.cpd.unb.br Wed Feb 28 13:33 MEZ 1996
Received: from guarany.cpd.unb.br by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de with SMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA285770809; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 13:33:29 +0100
Return-Path: <garciae@guarany.cpd.unb.br>
Received: by guarany.cpd.unb.br (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA62884; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:32:46 -0300
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:32:46 -0300 (GRNLNDST)
>From: edgardo garcia <garciae@guarany.cpd.unb.br>
To: Christoph Heidelbach <cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de>
Subject: Re: CCL:MD parameters from ab initio
In-Reply-To: <199602271757.MAA10086@www.ccl.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.960228090412.40677A-100000@guarany.cpd.unb.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO


Hi Christoph,

	CHARGES

I'm currently using AM1 CHELP Potential derived charges that reproduce
the molecular dipoles with 12% error, usually bigger dipoles.
The dipoles are similar to the ones obtained from 6-31G* on the same
compounds. I also tried Charge Equilibration Method of Antony Rappe
but the results are really bad, not only the dipoles are wrong in 
absolute values but the trends for a set of molecules is also wrong.
The AM1 dipole trends are also correct.
The problem with force fields is that you need fixed charges, now
charges change with the connectivity environment and also (but much less 
important) with the 3D environment. I use AM1 charges computed for
model compounds and then I symmetrize the charges, by a simple average of 
the values of topologicaly identical atoms. 
With this fixed 2D AM1 CHELP charges I then parametrize the Force Field
to reproduce energy data.
There is no point in trying to be more accurate on that unless you can
use hyper-atom-types that embody the atom molecular environment.


	VdW

The vdW parameters are another story :-( 
I don't really know what is a good method. The points are:

- what do you want ?
- what is the quality/cost ratio for the method ? Is is worth it ?

I'm using OPLS vdW parameters and they are fixed for specific atom types.
>From my point of view one of the most serius works for liquid phases.
Again for organic molecules, I bet you that the vdW parameters will
change a bit depending on the atom environment. It could be that some
ab initio procedure can give you a good functional form and good parameters,
considering the BSSE was removed, but the problem is :
can you really make use of this great accuracy in your force field ?
You have to consider that force fields use limited atom types and
also there are the vdW combination rules, ad hoc little formulas,
who know were they really work ?
There is a nice work for noble gases for the ab initio derivation of vdW 
parameters, functional forms and combination rules. I don't remember
the reference now but I can give it to you latter if you are interested.
The author is A.T. Hagler from Merk, I think it was on JACS, 1985 - 1993.

The big deal will be to find parameters that are independent of the 
environment, i.e., pure parameteres. The big problem is what are good
functional forms, how the parameters change with topological and with 3D 
environment and how to include this in a usefull Force Field that is able 
to handdle them to make practical and accurate predictions.

Hope this helps,


Edgardo

Dr.Edgardo Garcia
Dpto of Chemistry
University of Brasilia,
Brasilia DF, Brazil

>From cheidel@gwdg.de Thu Feb 29 16:53 MEZ 1996
Received: from gwdu42.gwdg.de by weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de with SMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA140329197; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:53:17 +0100
Return-Path: <cheidel@gwdg.de>
Received: from gwdu28.gwdg.de (actually gwdu28-eth.gwdg.de) by gwdu42.gwdg.de 
          with SMTP (PP); Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:52:44 +0100
Received: by gwdu28.gwdg.de; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/19Jan96-1057AM) id AA08694;
          Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:52:42 +0100
>From: cheidel <cheidel@gwdg.de>
Message-Id: <9602291552.AA08694@gwdu28.gwdg.de>
Subject: Re: CCL:MD parameters from ab initio (fwd)
To: cheidel@weizen.mpibpc.gwdg.de
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:52:41 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 3637
Status: RO

Forwarded message:
>From jxh@ibm12.biosym.com Wed Feb 28 23:30:32 1996
Delivery-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 23:30:32 +0100
Message-Id: <slBBNVaGmUGoRIKUR6@ibm12.biosym.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 14:25:37 -0800 (PST)
>From: Joerg Hill <jxh@ibm12.biosym.com>
To: cheidel@gwdg.de
Subject: Re: CCL:MD parameters from ab initio

Hallo,
> I am searching for some information about the evaluation of force field 
> parameters for molecular dynamics from ab initio or semiempirical
calculations.
> What I am looking for is how to fit atomic charges and
Lennard-Jones-parameters.
> Any answers will be greatly appreciated and I will summerize all replies.

Es gibt eine ganze Serie von Arbeiten ueber die Ableitung von repulsiven
van-der-Waals-Parametern aus ab initio Rechnungen von Boehm und Ahlrichs:

@article{boe82,
  author={H.-J.~B{\"o}hm and R.~Ahlrichs},
  title={A study of short--range repulsions},
  journal={J. Chem. Phys.},
  year=1982,
  volume=77,
  pages=2028
}
@article{boe84:1,
  author={H.-J.~B{\"o}hm and R.~Ahlrichs and P.~Scharf and H.~Schiffer},
  title={Intermolecular potentials for {CH$_4$, CH$_3$F, CHF$_3$,
CH$_3$Cl, CH$_2$Cl$_2$, CH$_3$CN, and CO$_2$}},
  journal={J. Chem. Phys.},
  year=1984,
  volume=81,
  pages=1389
}
@article{sag87,
  author={K.~P.~Sagarik and R.~Ahlrichs},
  title={A test particle model potential for formamide and molecular
dynamics simulations of the liquid},
  journal={J. Chem. Phys.},
  year=1987,
  volume=86,
  pages=5117
}
@article{sag86:1,
  author={K.~P.~Sagarik and R.~Ahlrichs and S.~Brode},
  title={ },
  journal={Mol. Phys.},
  year=1986,
  volume=57,
  pages=1247
}
@article{boe84:2,
  author={H.-J.~B{\"o}hm and C.~Meissner and R.~Ahlrichs},
  title={ },
  journal={Mol. Phys.},
  year=1984,
  volume=53,
  pages=651
}
@article{sag86:2,
  author={K.~P.~Sagarik and R.~Ahlrichs},
  title={ },
  journal={Chem. Phys. Letters},
  year=1986,
  volume=131,
  pages=74
}

Ich selbst habe vor kurzem ein Paper bei J. Comp. Chem. eingereicht, in
dem auch die
dispersiven Parameter aus ab initio Rechnungen abgeleitet werden. Ich
hoffe, das ich
bald Nachricht ueber die Annahme bekomme.

Viele Gruesse nach Deutschland
Joerg-R. Hill


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Dr. Joerg-Ruediger Hill   | Every attempt to employ mathematical methods in the
Biosym/MSI                | study of chemical questions must be considered pro-
9685 Scranton Road        | foundly irrational  and  contrary  to the spirit of
San Diego, CA 92121-2777  | chemistry ...  If mathematical analysis should ever
USA                       | hold a prominent place in chemistry - an aberration
                          | which  is  happily  almost  impossible  -  it would
Phone (619) 546-5508      | occasion  a rapid  and  widespread  degeneration of
Fax   (619) 458-0136      | that science.
E-mail jxh@biosym.com     |     Auguste Comte, Philosophie Positive,
Paris, 1838
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 The opinions expressed in this message are my personal opinions and no offical
 statements of Biosym Technologies, Inc. For informations about Biosym products
 take a look at: http://www.msi.com/.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-








>From jmanrique@beilstein.com Mon Mar 25 08:06 EST 1996
Received: from news.ossinc.net  for jmanrique@beilstein.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id IAA29683; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 08:06:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from NULL (ad31-153.compuserve.com [199.174.134.153]) by news.ossinc.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA09447; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 07:08:49 -0700
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 07:08:49 -0700
Message-Id: <199603251408.HAA09447@news.ossinc.net>
X-Sender: jmanrique@mail.beilstein.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: Jorge Manrique <jmanrique@beilstein.com>
Subject: Press Release
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Length: 1306
Status: RO


For Immediate Release

Editorial Contact:
Jorge Manrique 
Beilstein Information Systems
(415) 358-9091    
jmanrique@beilstein.com

Paul Collins
Digital Equipment Corporation
(508) 467-2251
paul.collins@mro.mts.dec.com


    Beilstein Information Systems Announces CrossFire Running 
                           on Digital's AlphaServer Family

New Orleans, LA., March 25, 1996 -- Beilstein Information Systems and 
Digital Equipment Corporation announced today a partnership that will 
develop and market solutions to address the needs of the research chemist and 
chemical information specialist. The first development to come out of the new
partnership will be Beilstein's CrossFire running across the Digital
AlphaServer product family on Digital's OpenVMS and Digital UNIX platforms.

The Alpha CrossFire Server, which will be available in the Summer of 1996,
will deliver a new avenue for access to the Beilstein Database, the world's
largest and most accurate collection of information on organic chemical
compounds.
______________________________________________________

For more details, please point your browser to:
http://www.beilstein.com/press.html


Jorge Manrique
Director of Marketing
Beilstein Information Systems, Inc.
jmanrique@beilstein.com
Phone: 415.358.9091
Fax:      415.358.9099



