From ooms@couperin.scf.fundp.ac.be  Tue Apr 23 03:48:25 1996
Received: from hermes.fundp.ac.be  for ooms@couperin.scf.fundp.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id DAA26322; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 03:44:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from couperin.scf.fundp.ac.be by hermes.fundp.ac.be; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Dec95-0443PM)
	id AA32756; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 09:47:02 +0200
Received: from cms-mac5.scf.fundp.ac.be by couperin.scf.fundp.ac.be (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA18029; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 09:07:54 +0200
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 09:07:54 +0200
Message-Id: <v02130501ada2592eb5fb@[138.48.16.161]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: ooms@couperin.scf.fundp.ac.be (ooms)
Subject: Molecular mechanics


Dear reader,
I am trying to obtain conformationnal barriers by Molecular mechanics with
the option torsion forces in the discover module but the height of those
barriers is overestimated. Could you give me the pitfalls to avoid when
using molecular mechanics in order to solve this problem.
A second question do you have any informations for the use with organic
compounds of the forcefield cff91 and cvff ?
I would be very greatefull if you could help me.
Best regards.
F. Ooms


---------------------------------------
Ooms Frederic
Faculte Universitaire Notre-Dame de la Paix
Laboratoire de Chimie Moleculaire Structurale
Rue de Bruxelles 61
B-5000 Namur (BELGIUM)
Tel : 32(81) 724569 - Fax : 32(81) 724530
e-mail :ooms@scf.fundp.ac.be



From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Tue Apr 23 07:48:35 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id HAA28818; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 07:39:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from arwen.unibe.ch  for bennett@ubeclu.unibe.ch
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id HAA17169; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 07:39:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <bennett.1180650671B@ubeclu.unibe.ch>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:37:11 +0100
From: Frederick Bennett <bennett@ubeclu.unibe.ch>
Subject: G94:splitting scratch files
To: chemistry@ccl.net
X-Mailer: VersaTerm Link v1.1


Hello,
      I have found the facility to split scratch files across file systems
very useful. The have one query however. If I have very long path names
defining filesystems the specification for how to handle the scratch files
becomes far to long to fit on an 80 column line. Is it possible to somehow
continue the specification onto further lines of the input file?

Frederick Bennett

===============================================================================
Namenet Address:   Frederick R. Bennett
                   
Papernet Address:  Institut fuer anorg. anal. und phys. Chemie
                   Freiestrasse 3
                   CH-300 Bern 9
                   Switzerland
                   
Mouthnet Address:  [41] (31) 631 4231

Internet Address:  bennett@ubeclu.unibe.ch
===============================================================================

From kozelka@citi2.fr  Tue Apr 23 11:48:30 1996
Received: from galaad.citi2.fr  for kozelka@citi2.fr
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id KAA03282; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 10:49:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bisance.citi2.fr by galaad.citi2.fr; (5.65/1.1.8.2/20Jun94-0455PM)
	id AA22566; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 16:48:46 +0200
Received: by bisance.citi2.fr (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA12074; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 16:48:10 --100
From: kozelka@citi2.fr (Jirda Kozelka)
Message-Id: <9604231448.AA12074@bisance.citi2.fr>
Subject: ECP's & all-electron basis
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 16:48:09 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Hello readers,

recently, several CCL members asked about using effective core potentials 
in DFT calculations. They were advised to the recent article by Russo et al.
(J.Phys.Chem.1995,1705). In this paper, DFT calculations using HF-derived ECP's 
were compared with all-electron calculations.                                        
I do not understand one point: For both approaches, the authors utilized a 
common all-electron basis set. It is not clear to me how one can use ECP's 
together with an all-electron basis.
Since ECP calculations treat only valence electrons explicitely, the procedure
of using ECP's with an all-electron basis set looks to my simple mind like
filling valence electrons into core orbitals.
Could one of the quantum chemistry professionals show me where I am making a mistake?
Thanking you in advance,

Jirka Kozelka
kozelka@citi2.fr
fax: ++331-42-86-83-87
~
~

From teuler@idris.fr  Tue Apr 23 13:48:41 1996
Received: from lumiere.idris.fr  for teuler@idris.fr
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id NAA04250; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 13:11:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sailor.idris.fr (teuler@sailor.idris.fr [130.84.12.91]) 
	  by lumiere.idris.fr (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA09614
	  for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 19:10:59 +0200
Received: (from teuler@localhost) by sailor.idris.fr (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA55957; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 19:10:57 +0200
From: Jean-marie Teuler <teuler@idris.fr>
Message-Id: <199604231710.TAA55957@sailor.idris.fr>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: FULLCI in Gaussian ?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 19:10:57 +0100



Dear CCLers,

Has someone succeeded in using the "FULLCI" keyword in Gaussian (either 
Gaussian 92 or Gaussian 94, up to revision C.2) ?

As for me, when I use it, the route generator calls two links which are absent 
>from the distribution (l921 and l923). Thus the calculation is stopped
abruptly.

Truly,

Jean-Marie Teuler

/--------------------------------------------------------\
|  Jean-Marie Teuler                                     |
|  CNRS-IDRIS                                            |
|  Batiment 506                                          |
|  B.P. 167                   E-mail : teuler@idris.fr   |
|  91403 Orsay Cedex          Tel    : 33.1.69.82.41.26  |
|  France                     Fax    : 33.1.69.28.52.73  |
\--------------------------------------------------------/



From jerry@dft.chem.cuhk.hk  Tue Apr 23 20:48:34 1996
Received: from iris.chem.cuhk.hk  for jerry@dft.chem.cuhk.hk
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id UAA08963; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 20:14:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dft.chem.cuhk.hk by iris.chem.cuhk.hk via SMTP (931110.SGI/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net id AA03077; Wed, 24 Apr 96 08:13:44 +0800
Received: by dft (950511.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH526/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	 id IAA01939; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 08:13:43 +0800
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 08:13:40 +0800 (HKT)
From: Jerry C C Chan <jerry@dft.chem.cuhk.hk>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: NBO for transition metal-ligand interaction
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960424073938.1878C-100000@dft>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear Netters,

	I notice that NBO has already been applied to transition metal 
containing systems.  Could anybody give me some references which concern 
the transition metal-ligand interaction using NBO analysis, in addition 
to the work by Maseras and Morokuma CPL 1992.

	I have tried applying NBO analysis to [Co(NH3)5Cl]2+ and I find 
some difficulties in interpretating some of the results:

if LP ( 1) N 3 / BD*( 1)Co 1-Cl 2, "lone pair electrons of N (donor) /
antibonding orbital of Co-Cl (acceptor)", is interpreted as an indication
of the importance of the resonance N-Co <-> N(+)-Co Cl(-), how should one
interprete BD ( 1)Co 1-Cl 2 / RY*(16)Co 1 ?

Many thanks,
Jerry C.C. Chan

jerry@dft.chem.cuhk.hk




