From grzesb@asp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl  Mon Jun 10 02:52:52 1996
Received: from asp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl  for grzesb@asp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id CAA07400; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 02:28:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by asp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl (5.61/1.34)
	id AA15249; Mon, 10 Jun 96 08:32:57 +0200
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 96 08:32:57 +0200
From: grzesb@asp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl (Grzegorz Bakalarski)
Message-Id: <9606100632.AA15249@asp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: correction: reading spectrums



   Dear Net,

In my summary on creating color spectrums in InsightII I asked
a new querry with mistake, that might be confusing! So, it should be:

Does anybody  know why insightII v.3.00 does NOT read spectrums created with

InsightII v.95.0 ???


(InsightII v.3.00  of course can read spectrums created by itself [ and
 InsightII v.95.0 can read spectrums created by itself ] ) The question
is why I cannot interchange spectrums from different versions ?

Best regards

			Grzegorz Bakalarski,ICM

From Vladimir.Shcherbukhin@hassle.se.astra.com  Mon Jun 10 08:52:59 1996
Received: from x400.swip.net  for Vladimir.Shcherbukhin@hassle.se.astra.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id HAA11091; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 07:58:21 -0400 (EDT)
X400-Received: by /ADMD=INTERX/C=SE/; Relayed; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:58:02 +0200
X400-Received: by mta INTERX2 in /ADMD=INTERX/C=SE/; Relayed;
               Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:58:02 +0200
X400-Received: by mta astrase1 in /ADMD=INTERX/C=SE/; Relayed;
               Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:57:39 +0200
X400-Received: by /PRMD=ASTRA/ADMD=400NET/C=SE/; Relayed;
               Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:58:19 +0200
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:58:19 +0200
X400-Originator: Vladimir.Shcherbukhin@hassle.se.astra.com
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=ASTRA/ADMD=400NET/C=SE/;960610125819]
Original-Encoded-Information-Types: teletex
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2)
Content-Identifier: CSI NC V3.0
From: Shcherbukhin Vladimir <Vladimir.Shcherbukhin@hassle.se.astra.com>
Message-ID: <"001FE4A3.MAI*/G=Vladimir/S=Shcherbukhin/O=Astra Hassle AB/PRMD=ASTRA/ADMD=400NET/C=SE/"@MHS>
To: CCL <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>
Subject:  Summary: software for calculating solvent-accessible areas


Hi folks,

Many many thanks to everybody who has replied to the question which I
recently posted on behalf of my colleague Marcel Linschoten. Some of you
were interested in getting summary of replies, so here it is.

Best regards,

Vlad

 ---------------------------------------------------------
Vladimir Scherbuhin  (Ph.D.) ! phone:  (+46-31)-776-2560
Precl. R&D, ASTRA Hassle AB  ! FAX:     (+46-31)-776-3710
Molndal S-43183, SWEDEN  !
 ---------------------------------------------------------
internet: Vladimir.Shcherbukhin@Hassle.se.ASTRA.com
 ---------------------------------------------------------
========================================================
>Hello folks,

>I'm looking for a program (may also include Sybyl SPL) to calculate
>hydrophobic and hydrophilic areas on the solvent accessible surface of a
>small
>molecule. Who can help ?

>Thanks,

>Marcel Linschoten, Sweden

========================================================
Marcel:

You might try HINT as it interfaces with Sybyl.  It's available from
EDUSOFT.  See their web page for details:

http://www.eslc.vabiotech.com/

 ---------------------------------------------------------
J. Bruce Pitner, Ph.D.                 pitner@bdrc.bd.com
Becton Dickinson Research Center           (919) 990-2147
P.O. Box 12016, RTP, NC 27709          Fax (919) 549-7572
 ---------------------------------------------------------
=========================================================
Hi,
There is a program writen by P. Gaillard for Sybyl who calculate MLP and
log P his name is Clip1.1.
We are using it at the university of Namur and it seems it works well. If
you are interested by thie program contact  me.
best regards,
fred Ooms

 ---------------------------------------
Ooms Frederic
Faculte Universitaire Notre-Dame de la Paix
Laboratoire de Chimie Moleculaire Structurale
Rue de Bruxelles 61
B-5000 Namur (BELGIUM)
Tel : 32(81) 724569 - Fax : 32(81) 724530
e-mail :ooms@scf.fundp.ac.be
=========================================================
Hi

Under SYBYL the best program to do that is an option Call Molcad. This
program is able to display molecular properties on Connolly surfaces and
Electron density surfaces.

The only problem is that you need an SGI with 24 bitplanes and hardware Z
bufferinstall. It is working well with an R4000 Indigo Elan

Bye

 --
_____________________________________________________________________
___________

Jacques-Antoine DURET              GROUPE DE PHARMACOCHIMIE
MOLECULAIRE
UFR DE PHARMACIE              Universite Joseph Fourier
GRENOBLE
5 Avenue de Verdun            Tel : (33) 76 04 10 00
38243 Meylan FRANCE           Fax ; (33) 76 41 85 71
          E-Mail : Jacques-Antoine.DURET@ujf-grenoble.fr
_____________________________________________________________________
=========================================================
SAVOL2 is what you are looking for. I got it from Bob Pearlman at University 

of
Texas, but it might be included with Sybyl.

pearlman@vax.phr.utexas.edu.

Yvonne Martin
Abbott Laboratories
=========================================================


Created, developed and extensively tested at the Institute of
Medicinal Chemistry of the University of Lausanne , CLIP is
a package with the following capabilities:

Computation and representation of the Molecular Lipophilicity Potential
(MLP)
on the solvent-accessible surface of molecules and macromolecules;
Calculation of n-octanol/water partition coefficients (log Poct) from the 
MLP
on the solvent-accessible surface;
Calculation of virtual log P values for individual conformers, and 
exploration
of the lipophilicity range accessible to a compound;
Computation and representation of the MLP in a given region of space
around molecules and macromolecules;
Computation and incorporation of the MLP into Comparative Molecular
Field Analysis (CoMFA)?.

Information about CLIP, publications can be found on the web at:

                                        http://www.unil.ch/pharm/clip/

 --------------------------------------------------------------

Frederic Billois
Universite de Lausanne
Section de Pharmacie.
Institut de Chimie Therapeutique.
CH-1015 Dorigny-Lausanne
Suisse

Tel  : +41.21.692.45.24
Fax : +41.21.692.45.05
e-mail  : Frederic.Billois@ict.unil.ch
WWW : http://www.unil.ch/pharm/ict/docs/ict.html

 ----------------------------------------------------------------
=========================================================
Dear Marcel:

     I have written an SPL script to calculate surface areas using the SAVOL
program that is shipped with Sybyl 6.2.  The script will also calculate per
residue and per static set contributions to the surface area.  If you define
two statics sets, one for hydrophobic and another for hydrophilic atoms, my
script should calculate exactly the quantities that you are interested in.

    The next e-mail message contains a copy of my SPL script.  I hope you 
find
it useful.

    Ciao,

Konrad

 ------------------------------------------------------------------
| Konrad Koehler              |  Computational Chemistry Group     |
| internet:  koehler@irbm.it  |  Department of Medicinal Chemistry |
|                             |  IRBM                              |
| telephone: +39-6-910-93606  |  Via Pontina Km. 30,600            |
| fax:       +39-6-910-93225  |  00040 Pomezia (Roma)              |
|                             |  Italy                             |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------
=========================================================

Note: those of you who would like to get the SPL script, please send a
message directly to Konrad Koehler.


From gerwens@mbox.theochem.uni-hannover.de  Mon Jun 10 10:52:58 1996
Received: from mgate.uni-hannover.de  for gerwens@mbox.theochem.uni-hannover.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id KAA11765; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 10:04:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: <gerwens@mbox.theochem.uni-hannover.de>
Received: from sun1.rrzn-user.uni-hannover.de (actually sun1.rrzn.uni-hannover.de) 
          by mgate with SMTP (PP); Mon, 10 Jun 1996 16:04:12 +0200
Received: by sun1.rrzn-user.uni-hannover.de (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA10010;
          Mon, 10 Jun 1996 16:03:52 +0200
Message-Id: <199606101403.QAA10010@sun1.rrzn-user.uni-hannover.de>
Subject: Smallest rectangular Box of set of points?
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net (CCL CCL)
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 16:03:49 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Content-Type: text


Dear CCL'ers,
I've got the problem to find the smallest possible rectangular Box
around a set of points (atoms) in space. Any suggestions or ideas
are wellcome. I'll summerize the results.

thanx in advance

Heiko Gerwens

Institut fuer Theoretische Chemie 
Universitaet Hannover
Am Kleinen Felde 30
D-30167 Hannover
Germany

email: gerwens@mbox.uni.hannover.de


From WILLSD@conrad.appstate.edu  Mon Jun 10 13:52:58 1996
Received: from listserv.appstate.edu  for WILLSD@conrad.appstate.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id NAA13061; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:10:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from spd.appstate.edu ([152.10.1.23]) by listserv.appstate.edu with ESMTP id <11244-6141>; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:10:32 -0500
Received: from conrad.appstate.edu by conrad.appstate.edu (PMDF V5.0-6 #8642)
 id <01I5QTMRUAHC9EDC51@conrad.appstate.edu> for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net; Mon,
 10 Jun 1996 13:10:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 	Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:10:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: willsd@conrad.appstate.edu
Subject: mopac for NT?
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Message-id: <Pine.PMDF.3.91.960610130230.568332469B-100000@conrad.appstate.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


I am contemplating porting the public domain version of mopac (either 6 
or 7) to ms windows NT.  Before doing so, I'd like to find out if anyone 
else may have already done this.  The source code is available on the ccl 
archives, but the does not seem to be a NT exectable version there.  So, 
does anybody out there have an NT version of MOPAC?  Can anyone provide 
any hints about pitfalls I am likely to find in doing such a port?  I 
assume that since the source code is freely available to the public, this 
is legal port to make, but if there is a difference of opinion about 
this, I'd like to hear about that as well.

I will summarize to the list any information I get.

Thanks,
Steve Williams
chemistry, asu
willsd@appstate.edu


From scho@quantum.cm.utexas.edu  Mon Jun 10 14:53:00 1996
Received: from quantum  for scho@quantum.cm.utexas.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id OAA13406; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:09:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by quantum (4.1/1.34/QUANTUM)
	id AA05503; Mon, 10 Jun 96 13:10:02 CDT
From: scho@quantum.cm.utexas.edu (Sarah Schofield )
Message-Id: <9606101810.AA05503@quantum>
Subject: Computing under SCO Unix
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:09:59 -0500 (CDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Dear Netters:
Is anyone familiar with chemical computing under SCO Unix, a commercial Unix 
operating system for Intel (Pentium, etc) based machines?  If so: 
1) Is LINUX better?
2) Are a Fortran compiler, Mathematica, and TeX available for SCO Unix? 
3) How does program operation compare with RISC based program operation? 
 Thanks in advance for replies.

scho@quantum.cm.utexas.edu


From vuckovic@hyper.com  Mon Jun 10 16:53:00 1996
Received: from www.hyper.com  for vuckovic@hyper.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id QAA14005; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 16:09:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dragan2.hyper.com (dragan2.hyper.com [204.50.97.30]) by www.hyper.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA01170 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 16:20:04 -0400
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 16:20:04 -0400
Message-Id: <199606102020.QAA01170@www.hyper.com>
X-Sender: vuckovic@hyper.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====================_834448202==_"
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: Dragan Vuckovic <vuckovic@hyper.com>
Subject: HyperChem User Group-II Announcement
X-Attachments: C:\EUDORA\DRT2;


--=====================_834448202==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The First World HyperChem User Group Meeting - Second Announcement

The Second announcement for HyperChem User Group Meeting (September 8-11, 
Clevelands House, Minett, Muskoka, Ontario, Canada) has been mailed. 
Interested persons should contact me or visit our home page 
(http://www.hyper.com, under the New section) for more information and 
the final registration form.

--=====================_834448202==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



 *********************************************************************
 * Dr. Dragan Lj. Vuckovic               phone: (519) 725-4040       * 
 * International Marketing Manager         fax: (519) 725-5193       *
 * Hypercube, Inc.                      e-mail: vuckovic@hyper.com   *
 * 419 Phillip Street                      URL: http://www.hyper.com *
 * Waterloo, Ontario                      Info: info@hyper.com       *
 * Canada, N2L 3X2                                                   *
 *********************************************************************

--=====================_834448202==_--


From sxr224@anugpo.anu.edu.au  Mon Jun 10 20:53:01 1996
Received: from anugpo.anu.edu.au  for sxr224@anugpo.anu.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id UAA15053; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 20:23:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from surya.anu.edu.au (surya.anu.edu.au [150.203.193.135]) by anugpo.anu.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA26361; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 10:23:03 +1000
Message-Id: <199606110023.KAA26361@anugpo.anu.edu.au>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <sxr224@smtphost>
From: "Shoba.Ranganathan" <sxr224@anu.edu.au>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 10:01:04 +0000
Subject: CCL:SUMM:Homology Modelling question
Reply-to: Shoba.Ranganathan@anu.edu.au
CC: SIEW@vms.huji.ac.il, jane@nmrfam.wisc.edu, marsh@chet.medc.umn.edu
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23)


I would to thank all CCLers who responded to my request.

Here's the summary for the "homology modelling" question (some
answers are from bionet.xtallography while repeats and signatures were
suppressed): 
> 
> I require references for the limits of homology 
> modelling, as well as the percentage of sequence 
> identity (in case I am unable to locate the reference). 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: treutlei@ludwig.edu.au

Here is my favourite for this question:

Sanders C and Schneider R. (1991) Database of Homology-Derived Protein
Structures and the Structural Meaning of Sequence Alignment. Porteins:
Struct., Funct., and Gen. 9, 56-68.

Best regards,
Herbert Treutlein
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: smb@bioch.ox.ac.uk

  You might want to consider using the term "comparative modelling",
  as opposed
to "homology modelling".  The reason for this is that the minimum
sequence identity that is "required" for useful 3-D prediction and
modelling can be as low as zero percent (or some other statistically
insignificant similarity). Thus it is, in fact, possible to model the
structure of a protein based on the structure of an unrelated (or very
distantly related) protein.
  Check out the high quality structure prediction, which used a
combination of several state-of-the-art techniques, in:

->TI: THE PROTEIN FOLD OF THE VON-WILLEBRAND-FACTOR TYPE-A DOMAIN IS
      PREDICTED TO BE SIMILAR TO THE OPEN TWISTED BETA-SHEET FLANKED
      BY ALPHA-HELICES FOUND IN HUMAN RAS-P21
  AU: EDWARDS_YJK, PERKINS_SJ
  JN: FEBS LETTERS, 1995, Vol.358, No.3, pp.283-286

  -- Simon M. Brocklehurst

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: Aravind Mittur <mittur@chaph.usc.edu>

Chris Sander and Gert Vriend have written some very good reviews and
articles on homology modeling over the last couple of years. You
should perhaps read the Sanderss' group home page at
http://www.embl-heidelberg.de.

The cut-off depends on a number of factors, including functional
validity. I can also recall an excellent review by Eisenhaber and
others in Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology early
last year.


Aravind M.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: crawfordoh@ornl.gov (Oakley H. Crawford)

See S. Mosimann, R. Meleshko, and M. N. G. James, Proteins 23, No. 3,
p. 301 (1995), and other papers in that issue of Proteins.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: wally@mag.com

Our company, Molecular Applications Group (MAG), supports and markets
a homology modeling package based on the work of our founder, Michael
Levitt ["SegMod", J. Mol. Biol. 226, 507-533 (1992)].  It is a highly
automated procedure, yet remarkably accurate.  Our primary product,
Look, acts as a graphical front-end to SegMod, permitting the user to
focus on the most important part of the homology modeling process--the
sequence alignment between your unknown and the reference
structure--rather than the mechanics of building the homology model.

For more information, please visit the following page on our Web site:
        <http://www.mag.com/products/look/segmod.html>
In particular, please see MAG's validation study of SegMod:
        <http://www.mag.com/products/look/segmod-validation.html> in
which, for example, a homology model with an RMS error of 2.79 A for
Calpha atoms was produced from a single template structure with only
27% sequence identity.

Please contact me if you have further questions or would like to
receive more information.

Wally E. Reiher
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: Arne Elofsson <arne@rune.biokemi.su.se>

According to Andrej Sali (and my memory)
>50% identity, 90-95% of internal sidechain correclty predicted, rmsd
       >2 A
40-50% sequecnce identity 80% internal sidechain correclty predicted,
       rmsd 2.5 A
30-40% loops predicted wrongly, 75 % of internal sidechain not
       correctly predicted.

arne

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: MARTIN@cmdb.pprd.abbott.com

Jonathan Greer and colleagues have just written a chapter for Reviews
in Computational Chemistry. He can be contacted at:

Jonathan.Greer@abbott.com

Yvonne Martin
(I do not have a reply from Jonathan Greer till date - Shoba)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: schuller@indigo1.biomol.uci.edu (Dave Schuller)

I assume you mean for SUCCESSFUL homology modeling?  You can model
anything you want; whether it is useful or meaningful is another
question.

I could point out a couple attempts that failed (in my view) with
18-20% identity.  Some of the reasons for the failure:  1) despite the
overall identity numbers, there was no homology at all for one of the
regions modelled. 1b) This fact was obscured by incorrect sequence
alignments. 2) The modelling attempts may have been influenced by an
incomplete and incorrect crystal structure of a third homologous
protein.

Banci, Carloni & Savellini (1994) Biochemistry 33, 12356-12366.

Smith, Du & Loew (1995)  Nuclear Magnetic Resonanc of Paramagnetic
Macromolecules, Kluwer Academic publishers, the Netherlands, pp.
75-93.

naturally, the authors would probably prefer to dwell on the positive
aspects, such as correct placement of some or all of the active site
residues, and not on the fact that some residues were mis-placed by
tens of Angstroms.

Dave Schuller

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu (C.S.RAMAN)

Homology modelling has been done with as little as 30% sequence
identity to a known structural protein.  Generally, one finds reports
where there was ~40-50% sequence identity and 70% similarity via
conservative replacements.

-raman

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
===========================================================
Dr. Shoba RANGANATHAN                     
Computational Mol Biology & Drug Design Group
Div. of Biochemistry & Mol. Biology 
John Curtin School of Medical Research                 
Australian National University          Tel: +616-279-8301                           
Canberra ACT 0200                       Fax: +616-249-0415
Australia.              email:Shoba.Ranganathan@anu.edu.au
===========(http://biocomp.anu.edu.au/~sra/)==============


From axb224@anugpo.anu.edu.au  Mon Jun 10 21:53:01 1996
Received: from anugpo.anu.edu.au  for axb224@anugpo.anu.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id VAA15246; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 21:34:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nicepc.anu.edu.au (nicepc.anu.edu.au [150.203.193.136]) by anugpo.anu.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA06248 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 11:34:20 +1000
Message-Id: <199606110134.LAA06248@anugpo.anu.edu.au>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <axb224@pophost>
From: "Andrey Blizniuk" <axb224@anu.edu.au>
Organization: ANU
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 10:57:21 +0010
Subject: Monter Carlo applications to diffusion?
Reply-to: Andrey.Bliznyuk@anu.edu.au
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23)


Dear CCLers,

I am looking for application of Monter Carlo methods to
the diffusion problem. Any references are welcome. It seems, people
prefer to use Brownian dynamics (any ideas why?).

Thanks,

Dr. Andrey Bliznyuk
Computational Molecular Biology and Drug Design Group
Division of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
John Curtin School of Medical Research
Australian National University
PO Box 334, Canberra, ACT 2601
Australia
Email: Andrey.Bliznyuk@anu.edu.au
http://biocomp.anu.edu.au/~aab



