From axb224@anugpo.anu.edu.au  Mon Jun 24 00:56:06 1996
Received: from anugpo.anu.edu.au  for axb224@anugpo.anu.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id AAA05480; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 00:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nicepc.anu.edu.au (nicepc.anu.edu.au [150.203.193.136]) by anugpo.anu.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA26618 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 14:02:38 +1000
Message-Id: <199606240402.OAA26618@anugpo.anu.edu.au>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <axb224@pophost>
From: "Andrey Blizniuk" <axb224@anu.edu.au>
Organization: ANU
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 13:23:25 +0010
Subject: Monte Carlo for Diffusion - Summary
Reply-to: Andrey.Bliznyuk@anu.edu.au
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23)


Dear Netters,

Thanks to everyone who responded to my question about
use of Monte Carlo for diffusion. Some people
asked about summary. I am sending them the copy
of this message.

(1)
Several people recommend to look at Monte Carlo Page
<http://www.cooper.edu/engineering/chemechem/monte.html>
Unfortunately, I couldn't find anything on the subject in there.
But I am still looking :-).

(2)
Mr. Mark J Biggs <M.Biggs@surrey.ac.uk>
sent following references on the diffusion in porous solids:

Abbasi et al., AIChE Journal V29, p617, 1983
Havlin and Ben Avraham, Adv in Physics, V36, 695, 1987.
Sahimi, J Chem Phys, V92, 5107, 1990
Gusev et al, J Chem Phys, V99, 2221, 1993
Nakano and Evans, J Chem Phys, V78, 2568, 1983
Evans et al, J Chem Phys, V72, 2967, 1980

Tomadakis and Sotirchos, J Chem Phys, V99, 9820, 1993
-----------------------, AIChE J, V39, 397, 1993
they have a few more papers in these Journals as well

Melkote and Jensen, AIChE J, V35, 1942, 1989.


(3)
Dr Kieran F Lim <lim@deakin.edu.au>
sent the following comments:

Monte Carlo (MC) methods imply that the underlying maths has some 
random
event.  Brownian dynamics has the *assumption* that the solvent 
imparts
random forces to the molecule (substrate) of interest.  Molecular 
dynamics (MD)
incorporates both solvent and substrate motions and so there is 
nothing
random - ie non-MC method.  By including everything, the MD
calculation is much bigger - hence *many* (not most) prefer MC rather 
than MD.
the choice depends on the nature of the problem, the size of your 
system and
your computer resources.

(4)
While waiting for the reply from CCL I had a look at the Current
Contents. The following papers may be useful:

H. Gudbjartsson S. Patz "NMR Diffusion Simulation Based on
Conditional Random Walk", IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,
1995, 14, 636-642

P.A. Mahama, J.L. Linderman "A Monter Carlo Study of the
Dynamics of G-Protein Activation", Biophysical Journal, 1994,
67, 1345-1357.

Z. Hong-Dong, L. Jian-Ming, Y. Yu-Liang "Sample duplication
Method for Monte Carlo Simulation of Large Reaction-Diffusion
System", Science in China, Ser.B., 1994, 37, 385-394.

P. Gao "Computer Experiments for Surface Diffusion: The
Real Time in Monte Carlo Simulations", Physical Review Letters,
1994, 73, 2595-2598.

H. Breuer, W. Huber, F. Petruccione "Fast Monte Carlo algorithm
for nonequilibrium systems", Physical Review E, 1996, 4232-4235.

Sincerely,

Dr. Andrey Bliznyuk
Computational Molecular Biology and Drug Design Group
Division of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
John Curtin School of Medical Research
Australian National University
PO Box 334, Canberra, ACT 2601
Australia
Email: Andrey.Bliznyuk@anu.edu.au
http://biocomp.anu.edu.au/~aab


From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Mon Jun 24 01:56:05 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id BAA06018; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 01:49:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from goliat.eik.bme.hu  for zhajnal@goliat.eik.bme.hu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id BAA19696; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 01:49:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from zhajnal@localhost) by goliat.eik.bme.hu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA11782; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 07:49:24 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 07:49:24 +0200 (MET DST)
From: HAJNAL Zoltan <zhajnal@eik.bme.hu>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Heat of sublimation/ ethylcarbamate
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960624073130.5860A-100000@goliat>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear All,
could anybody send me or point to data regarding the
heat of sublimation of ethylcarbamate?
Thank you!  
		Zoltan Hajnal

From lankau@blubber.chemie.uni-hamburg.de  Mon Jun 24 02:56:09 1996
Received: from blubber.chemie.uni-hamburg.de  for lankau@blubber.chemie.uni-hamburg.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id CAA06244; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 02:42:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by blubber.chemie.uni-hamburg.de (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA15094; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 08:29:53 +0200
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 08:29:52 +0200 (DFT)
From: Timm Lankau <lankau@blubber.chemie.uni-hamburg.de>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: mag. properties of solids
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.960624082652.12014A-100000@blubber.chemie.uni-hamburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear collegues,

does any one of you have experiences with the calculation of magnetic 
properties of solids and is willing to share it with us?
We are looking for a code (public domain or shareware prefered) for the 
computation of such properties.
Results will collected and posted to the list.

Thank you very much.

Best wishes

Timm

==========================================================================

Timm Lankau                            phone  (+)40 4123 3686
Institut fuer Physikalische Chemie     fax    (+)40 4123 3452
Universitaet Hamburg                   e-mail lankau@chemie.uni-hamburg.de
Bundesstr. 45
20146 Hamburg
Germany
----------- End Forwarded Message -----------



From ncapron@ccr.jussieu.fr  Mon Jun 24 03:56:27 1996
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr  for ncapron@ccr.jussieu.fr
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id DAA09201; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 03:25:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from moka.ccr.jussieu.fr (moka.ccr.jussieu.fr [134.157.1.23])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.7.5/jtpda-5.2) with ESMTP id JAA25963
          for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 09:25:37 +0200 (METDST)
Received: from (ncapron@localhost)
          by moka.ccr.jussieu.fr (8.7.5/jtpda-5.2) id JAA171793
          for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 09:25:36 +0200
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 09:25:36 +0200
From: ncapron@ccr.jussieu.fr (Nathalie CAPRON)
Message-Id: <199606240725.JAA171793@moka.ccr.jussieu.fr>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: CCL :Bulk modulus of silicon


 Dear all, 
 I should need for my study a complete
 ( or near ) list of the calculations carried out on silicon
 which give the theoritical values for the elastic constants 
 and especially bulk modulus
 I have already some papers but I am affraid to miss some 
 important information.
 Could someone give me the references of these papers ? 
 Thank you in advance
 Nathalie Capron
 
 Laboratoire de Chimie Physique 
 Matiere et Rayonnement
 11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie
 75231 Paris Cedex 01
 ncapron@ccr.jussieu.fr

 


From tp@elptrs7.rug.ac.be  Mon Jun 24 06:56:15 1996
Received: from elptrs7.rug.ac.be  for tp@elptrs7.rug.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id GAA10353; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 06:23:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by elptrs7.rug.ac.be (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA19138; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 12:24:21 +0200
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 12:24:21 +0200 (DFT)
From: "Park, Tae-Yun" <tp@elptrs7.rug.ac.be>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: HELP!(urgent):theoretical discrimication & software
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.960624093437.20142A-100000@elptrs7.rug.ac.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear researchers in computational chemistry,

I'm a ph.D. student of State University of Ghent, Belgium.
I'm working with zeolite HZSM-5. The goal of my work is 
to develop a detailed kinetic model for hydrocarbon 
transformation process over HZSM-5 catalyst.

I have some urgent questions for my ph.D. work, which have 
been discussed with many people who were in the field of 
chemical engineering/organic chemistry/electrical chemistry 
in my university or in the internet. 

So far, I could not get reliable solutions, which have stuck 
me for relatively long time. During searching for the solutions, 
I realized that the best people who can give me an advice are 
in the field of computational chemistry.

Please take some time to read the following questions 
and give me some informaion/advice if it doesn't bother 
you too much.


*** About the structure of surface carbenium ions and symmetry number ***

First thing I have to calculate is the symmetry number 
of surface carbenium ions on the zeolite surface, which 
is formed by protonation of various olefins. 

1. How can we describe the bonding of carbenuim 
   ions to the surface?  Is the bonding more 
   ionic or covalent?  I know the proton is surely 
   covalently bound, but it is less clear for the
   case of hydrocarbons(more exactly olefins) adsorbed 
   on zeolite.

2. What is the symmetry number for such surface carbenium
   ions comparing with corresponding gas phase carbenium 
   ions? In most cases, I believe, the symmetry number
   of surface ions are identical with those in gas phase,
   if there is no 2-fold axes.

   Consider the following examples.

             C
              \
               C-C+-C (secondary ion in gas phase) 
              /
             C        
            symmetry number=3*3*3=27


             C
              \
               C-C-C (secondary ion on the surface) 
              /  |
             C   |
              --(+)--
             symmetry number=3*3*3=27


   If there is two-fold axes, however,

                    C
                     \
      2-fold axes.....C+-C-C (tertiary ion in gas phase)
                     /
                    C
                  symmetry number=(3*3*3)*2=54


                           C
                            \
      Not a 2-fold axes(?)...C+-C-C (tertiary on the surface)
                            /|
                           C |
                          --(+)--
                         symmetry number=3*3*3=27

   I think the surface ion loose its 2-fold axes due to 
   the bonding to the catalyst surface.

I just want to know whether those approach to calculate the 
symmetry number of surface carbenium ions is theoretically 
correct.  To check this point, I think, the bonding of carbenium 
ions to the surface should be defined first, in a certain way 
of theoretical approach.


**** About the structure of activated complex ******

Next problem that I have to solve is concerning the structure
of activated complex in transition state for beta-scission.

That is, an elementary step representing beta-scission,

        R1 ---> (Transition State) ----> R2 + O

where R1 and R2 are the reactant and product carbenium ion,
respectively, and O is the product olefin.

What I want to know is the structure of the activated complex
in the transition state, as detailed as possible in a certain
theoretical way; how many bonds are related, which bonds are to
be broken, which bond will be formed, and what does the activated
complex look like(is it more like carbenium ion or more like
olefin?), etc.

Is there any reference/software to describe the structure 
of activated complex for this reaction in a theoretical way?


**** About heat of formation for gas phase carbenium ions ***

My final question is about the calculation of thermodynamic data,
more exactly, the heat of formation of gas-phase carbenium ions.

The reason is the following:

To develop a detailed kinetic model, a complex reaction
network containing a lot of elementary steps has to be
considered. Large number of different carbenium ions are
involved in the elementary steps, which produces large number
of kinetic parameters that have to be estimated by a certain
optimization method.

Recently, a solution to solve the problem associated with
the large number of the parameters has been considered, i.e,
by applying the "Polanyi relation".   This relation needs 
only relative differences in heat of reactions in each elementary 
steps.  This means that the heat of formation for the surface 
carbenium ions are not necessary, but, at least, heat of formation 
of gas-phase carbenium ions appearing in the reaction network 
should be given. Unfortunately, only limited amount of data 
can be found in the literature, so that some analytical method 
to calculate the heat of formation is necessary.

Benson's group contribution method has been known as one of 
the most approprate way to calculate the thermodydamic properties.   
The group contribution value of positively-charged carbon atom 
involved in the carbenium ions is, however, not available at 
the moment.

The only solution I found recently is using a certain quantum
chemistry package such as "MOPAC". My question is that is this
a suitable package (accurate enough) to calculate the heat of 
formation data I need? If so, how can I obtain a copy of this 
package? If not, is there any other software in the field of 
computational chemistry to calculate these data?

*************** End of my questions *************************


Thank you very much for reading my long message. Since I'm not
familar with computational chemistry field, some of my questions
would make you feel boring or make you think that this is too
basic/stupid questions.  I'm really sorry if it is really so.

Any suggestions/informations will be greatly appreciated.
Particularly, infomation on some computational chemistry softwares
(name of the software/how to get it) which give some theoretical 
point of view on these problems will give me a great help.

Thanks again for your patience and I am highly looking forward to
hearing any news from you soon.

 

				Sincerely,

				     Park, TAE-YUN    
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Laboratorium voor Petrochemische Techniek
Krijgslaan 281, Blok S5  
9000 Gent, Belgium	  
TEL:+(32)-0(9)-264-4527
FAX:+(32)-0(9)-264-4999
e-mail: tp@elptrs7.rug.ac.be
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=





From Darren.Andrews@man.ac.uk  Mon Jun 24 07:56:11 1996
Received: from nessie.mcc.ac.uk  for Darren.Andrews@man.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id HAA10752; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 07:52:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [130.88.12.235] (actually femt03.ch.man.ac.uk) 
          by nessie.mcc.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Mon, 24 Jun 1996 12:52:17 +0100
X-Sender: mbcdpa@130.88.200.20
Message-Id: <v02140b00adf431954c4f@[130.88.12.235]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 12:53:38 +0100
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: Darren.Andrews@man.ac.uk (Darren Andrews)
Subject: MD of ET in solution


A little while ago I posted a question about molecular dynamics simulations
of electron transfer reactions in solution.  These are the replies I got.


Status:

Dear Darren,

I think you should contact Daniel BORGIS at
Laboratoire de Physique Theorique des Liquides
Universite Pierre et Marie Curie
4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris cedex
e-mail: borgis@lptl.jussieu.fr

Yours sincerely,


--

=============================================================
Dr HERVE TOULHOAT
Group Leader
Molecular Modeling and Computational Chemistry
Division of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics
INSTITUT FRANCAIS DU PETROLE
1 & 4 Avenue de Bois-Preau
BP 311 92506 RUEIL-MALMAISON Cedex FRANCE
TEl: +33-1-47-52-73-50
FAX: +33-1-47-52-70-22
Email: herve.toulhoat@ifp.fr (or toulhoat@irsil47.ifp.fr)
==============================================================
Status:

>I am looking for a program that will calculate molecular dynamics for
>solvent/solute systems where a reaction (electron transfer) occurs.  Is
>there a general code for the liquid dynamics bit and is there a standard
>way of modelling the reaction?
>
Hi Darren,
        Good question, and sine I don't know any answers could you send me a
summary.

        My initial thought not knowing much about the systems that you're
interested in is that you would need some kind of mixed mode code.  see for
example

M.J. Field, P.A. Bash, M. Karplus. A combined quantum mechanical and
molecular mechanical potential for molecular dynamics simulations; J Comp
Chem 1990, 11(6) :700-33.

But I don't know of anything  created specifically for electron transfer
modeling.

        Iain.
_____________________________________________________________
"Nice? It's the only thing," said the Computer Rat solemnly. " Believe me,
my young friend, there is nothing - absolutley nothing - half so much
worth doing as simply messing about with computers.  Simply messing !"
                                                      --  Appologies to
Kenneth Grahame
_____________________________________________________________
        Iain McVey

        Graduate Student
        Department of Chemistry
        Kent State University
        Kent, Ohio, USA
        imcvey@scorpio.kent.edu
_________________________________________________________________
Status:

Hi!

The only way I can think to do this is in a QM/MM environemt - try Charmm.

Cheers

Alex

+--------------------------------------------------+
|Alternate E-mail A.J.Turner@Bath.ac.uk            |
|www home @ http://www.bath.ac.uk/~chpajt/home.html|
+--------------------------------------------------+
Status:

Darren Andrews wrote:
>
> I am looking for a program that will calculate molecular dynamics for
> solvent/solute systems where a reaction (electron transfer) occurs.  Is
> there a general code for the liquid dynamics bit and is there a standard
> way of modelling the reaction?

I vaguely recall that Michiel Sprik did some work somewhat similar to this.
Try a BIDS search on his name, and you might turn up something.  And he and
Mike Klein (I think) did some Feynmann path-integral MD on solvation of
an electron.

sincerely

Keith Refson

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Email   : keith@earth.ox.ac.uk    | Dr Keith Refson, Dept of Earth Sciences|
| TEL(FAX): +44 1865 272026 (272072)| Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PR, UK         |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be  Mon Jun 24 11:56:13 1996
Received: from hartree.quantchem.kuleuven.ac.b  for Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id LAA11995; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:46:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hartree.quantchem.kuleuven.ac.be id AA24466
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>); Mon, 24 Jun 1996 17:45:50 +0100
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 17:45:48 +0100 (NFT)
From: Steven Creve <Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: CCL: BHandH in G94
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.960624174431.32822A-100000@hartree.quantchem.kuleuven.ac.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hi,

Does anyone know how to specify the Becke-Half-and-Half/LYP 
Density Functional in G94 ?
(In G92/DFT it was just a simple keyword: BHandHLYP)

Thanks

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Creve                       steven.creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be
Labo Quantumchemie                 steven@hartree.quantchem.kuleuven.ac.be
Celestijnenlaan 200F
3001-HEVERLEE                      tel: (32) (16) 32 73 93
BELGIUM                            fax: (32) (16) 32 79 92


From mhurley@shs2.chem.nd.edu  Mon Jun 24 12:56:13 1996
Received: from shs2.chem.nd.edu  for mhurley@shs2.chem.nd.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id MAA12129; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 12:06:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by shs2.chem.nd.edu (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA17030; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:06:43 -0500
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:06:43 -0500
From: mhurley@shs2.chem.nd.edu (Margaret Mary Hurley)
Message-Id: <9606241606.AA17030@shs2.chem.nd.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: constraint dynamics



Hi Netters. 

     I am interested in using Ciccotti, Ferrario, and Ryckaert's 
  constraint dynamics algorithm (Mol. Phys. 1982, 47, 1253-1264)
  for rigid systems. Does anyone out there have a code which uses
  this? I'm currently using a velocity verlet integration scheme,
  but I'll take any application of the constraint algorithm that's out there.
  I'm working with a linear triatomic solvent, so standard SHAKE or
  RATTLE don't help me much. Any help is appreciated. 

                                     Maggie Hurley
                                     mhurley@shs3.chem.nd.edu

From topper@cooper.edu  Mon Jun 24 13:15:23 1996
Received: from magnum.cooper.edu  for topper@cooper.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id LAA12085; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:59:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from zeus.cooper.edu by magnum.cooper.edu with SMTP id AA29447
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>); Mon, 24 Jun 1996 12:01:25 -0400
Received: by zeus.cooper.edu id AA26531
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5); Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:58:01 -0400
From: TOPPER ROBERT <topper@cooper.edu>
Message-Id: <199606241558.AA26531@zeus.cooper.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Monte Carlo for Diffusion - Summary
To: Andrey.Bliznyuk@anu.edu.au
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:58:00 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <199606240402.OAA26618@anugpo.anu.edu.au> from "Andrey Blizniuk" at Jun 24, 96 01:23:25 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha3]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hi all,
I will put a copy of Andrew's summary on the
Molecular Monte Carlo home page. Just FYI.
best, robert

************************************************************************
Robert Q. Topper                       email:   topper@cooper.edu
Asst. Prof. of Chemistry               phone:   (212) 353-4378
The Cooper Union                       FAX:     (212) 353-4341 
51 Astor Place                         subway:  take the 6 to Astor Place 
New York, NY 10003 USA                          or the N/R to 8th St/NYU
http://www.cooper.edu/engineering/chemechem/depts_info/topper.html
************************************************************************
Check out the Molecular Monte Carlo home page!
http://www.cooper.edu/engineering/chemechem/monte.html
************************************************************************

From jdurant@mephisto.ca.sandia.gov  Mon Jun 24 13:56:14 1996
Received: from mephisto.ca.sandia.gov  for jdurant@mephisto.ca.sandia.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id NAA12623; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 13:50:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mephisto.ca.sandia.gov (931110.SGI/890607.SGI)
	(for chemistry@www.ccl.net) id AA17276; Mon, 24 Jun 96 10:50:37 -0700
From: jdurant@mephisto.ca.sandia.gov (Joe Durant)
Message-Id: <9606241750.AA17276@mephisto.ca.sandia.gov>
Subject: Re: CCL:G:BHandH in G94
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 10:50:37 -0800 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hi!

At the risk of getting flamed by the folks at Gaussian I present my
hack to get g94 to run Becke-Half-and-Half/LYP calculations by
explicitly setting the options.  Caveat Emptor!  I have no control
over what the folks at Gaussian do with their codes, so I would be
sure to verify that it gives the expected answer with your revision
before plunging in.

# BLYP 6-31G* iop(5/45=10000500, 5/46=05000500, 5/47=10001000)

BHANDHLYP, explicitly called out

0,1
H
H,1,HH
     Variables:
HH=1.387

Hope this helps!  BTW, in my experience BHANDHLYP has proven to be the
best functional to use for transition state calculations.... the
others that Gaussian provides give surfaces which are too attractive
and barriers which are too low....

Joe

-- 

####################################################################
#  Joe Durant                      voice:  (510) 294-3343          #
#  Mail Stop 9057                  FAX:    (510) 294-2276          #
#  Sandia National Laboratories    jdurant@ca.sandia.gov           #
#  Livermore, CA  94551            http://mephisto.ca.sandia.gov   #
####################################################################


From branch@acetsw.amat.com  Mon Jun 24 14:56:14 1996
Received: from cressida.mis.amat.com  for branch@acetsw.amat.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id OAA12882; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 14:30:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cressida.mis.amat.com (daemon@localhost) by cressida.mis.amat.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA07935 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:16:54 -0700
Received: from romeo.mis.amat.com (romeo.mis.amat.com [152.135.118.219]) by cressida.mis.amat.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA07931 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:16:54 -0700
Received: from cvd17 ([152.135.245.177]) by romeo.mis.amat.com with SMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA002601775; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:42:55 -0700
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Michael A. Branch" <branch@acetsw.amat.com>
X-Sender: branch@cvd17
To: CCL <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: graph to table software
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960624112904.3346A-100000@cvd17>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


hi,
  does anybody know of a software package (public domain)
that converts graphs to tables?  

thanks,
Mike

---------------------------------------------------------
Michael A. Branch		"I turn big problems into
Process Engineer, HDP-CVD	 little problems."	
Applied Materials, Inc.		(408) 563-0689		
Santa Clara, CA  95051	       				 
mbranch@hammerhead.eecs.berkeley.edu
---------------------------------------------------------


From arno@alnitak.usc.edu  Mon Jun 24 15:03:30 1996
Received: from alnitak.usc.edu  for arno@alnitak.usc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id OAA12905; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 14:32:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from arno@localhost)
	by alnitak.usc.edu (8.7.2/8.7.2/usc)
	id LAA15365 for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Arno Papazyan <arno@rcf.usc.edu>
Message-Id: <199606241831.LAA15365@alnitak.usc.edu>
Subject: Re: MD of ET in solution
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 11:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <v02140b00adf431954c4f@[130.88.12.235]> from "Darren Andrews" at Jun 24, 96 12:53:38 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Darren Andrews asked about simulating electron transfer reactions in MD:

I waited to see whether someone else would point out Arieh Warshel's 
Empirical Valence Bond (EVB) approach, before jumping in.  Since I haven't
seen any, I should say that the EVB approach represents a quite reliable
and feasible method to incorporate reactions (not only electron transfer)
into computer simulations.  It is a no-nonsense, result-oriented method.
His book "Computer modeling of chemical reactions in enzymes and solutions"
contains enough information about the method, with references included.
I would definitely recommend you to take a look.

Arno Papazyan
arno@usc.edu

From chem8@unix.york.ac.uk  Mon Jun 24 15:56:21 1996
Received: from lendal.york.ac.uk  for chem8@unix.york.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id OAA13061; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 14:56:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ebor.york.ac.uk by lendal.york.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 24 Jun 1996 19:53:53 +0100
Received: by ebor.york.ac.uk (950511.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH526/940406.SGI)	 
          id TAA10722; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 19:55:44 +0100
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 19:55:43 +0100 (BST)
From: John Waite <chem8@unix.york.ac.uk>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Clustered HPs?
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960624195358.10576A-100000@ebor.york.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



 Hi Netters,
    Does anyone know of an academic or research establishment that has
 a cluster of Hewlett-Packard workstations and/or servers, used for scientific
 purposes?
    If so I'm interested in finding out:
    Where these are,
    What configuration is used (ie how many HPs, models, approximate
       amounts of memory and disk per machine),
    How they are clustered (ie type of communication between the computers) and
    what types of code are (mainly) run on the cluster?


    Thanks,
      John




 Dr. John Waite,                            e-mail:  chem8@york.ac.uk   or
 The National Hellenic Research Foundation,   rosen@cyclades.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr
 Organic and Pharaceutical Institute,       phone: ++30-1-7238958 (direct)
 Vas. Konstantinou 48,                      phone: ++30-1-7247913(secrtry. Mary)
 Athens 116-35,                             fax:   ++30-1-7247913
 Greece
                                       or
 NCRS "Democritos",                         phone: ++30-1-6513112-5 X219
 c/o Dr. G.Kordas,                          e-mail john@john.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr 
 Material Science Institute,
 Aghia Paraskevi,
 Attikis,
 Athens 153-10,
 Greece


From tp@elptrs7.rug.ac.be  Mon Jun 24 18:56:15 1996
Received: from elptrs7.rug.ac.be  for tp@elptrs7.rug.ac.be
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id SAA14427; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 18:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by elptrs7.rug.ac.be (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA07484; Tue, 25 Jun 1996 00:24:48 +0200
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 00:24:47 +0200 (DFT)
From: "Park, Tae-Yun" <tp@elptrs7.rug.ac.be>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Graphical interface for MOPAC6.0
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.960625002210.15402A-100000@elptrs7.rug.ac.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hi, all!

Can anyone give me any information on a suitable graphical
interface (CAChe) for MOPAC6.0 (name/how to get it) ?

Thanks in advance.



				Sincerely,

				     Park, TAE-YUN    
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Laboratorium voor Petrochemische Techniek
Krijgslaan 281, Blok S5  
9000 Gent, Belgium	  
TEL:+(32)-0(9)-264-4527
FAX:+(32)-0(9)-264-4999
e-mail: tp@elptrs7.rug.ac.be
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


